1000/1000
Hot
Most Recent
Empiric rheology is considered a useful tool for assessing the technological quality of wheat. Over the decades, several tests have been adapted from common to durum wheat, and new approaches have been proposed to meet the needs of the players of the durum wheat value chain. It is here provided an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the rheological tests currently used to evaluate the quality of durum wheat semolina.
Gluten Property |
General Definition |
Applied to Durum Wheat Dough and Pasta |
---|---|---|
Viscoelasticity |
Ability of solids to have simultaneous viscous and elastic properties |
The determinantal characteristic of gluten, necessary for pasta-making process |
Viscosity |
Resistance of a liquid to flow |
It determines in which way the dough flows through the press and the dye |
Elasticity |
Ability of solids to recover their initial shape after deformation |
It allows the mass to withstand strong compression (about 10 MPa) during the extrusion phase and to assure regular shrinkage during drying (shape maintenance) |
Extensibility |
Maximum degree of deformation reached by solids before breakage |
Excessive extensibility doesn’t counteract the mechanical stresses during processing |
Tenacity |
Resistance of dough to deformation |
It allows the mass to resist, without breaking, the high/intense mechanical stresses (shear and stretching) occurring during the extrusion phase |
Strength |
Ability of solids to resist mechanical stress |
It allows proteins to form a regular and continuous network that promotes good cooking quality |
Test |
Principle |
Hydration Level |
Features |
Standard Method for Durum Wheat Semolina |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gluten Index |
Gluten ability to pass through a sieve after centrifugation |
not required |
- Short time for analysis (10 min) - Small amount of sample (10 g) - Need to extract gluten - Overestimation of the value in case of low protein content samples - Low capacity of discriminating semolina of medium quality |
|
Glutograph® |
Gluten resistance to stretching |
not required |
- Short time for analysis (20 min, including extraction and resting time) - Small amount of sample (10 g) - Need to extract gluten - High variability |
No |
Alveograph |
Dough resistance to tridimensional extension |
≈52 g water/100 g semolina (14% moisture basis) |
- Long time for analysis (50 min) - Large amount of sample (250 g) - High influence of the analyst - Widely used in the field, especially in Europe |
Yes [45] |
GlutoPeak® |
Aggregation kinetics of gluten proteins |
≈100 g water/100 g semolina (14% moisture basis) |
- Short time for analysis (5-10 min) - Small amount of sample (9 or 10 g) - Low influence of the analyst - Few available studies |
No |
Mixolab |
Dough resistance to both mechanical and thermal stress |
≈60 g water/100 g semolina (14% moisture basis) |
- Long time for analysis (45 min) - Large amount of sample (50 g) - Low influence of the analyst - Difficulty in following the set temperature profile |
No |
Test |
Index |
Description |
Type of Information |
---|---|---|---|
Gluten Index |
Value from 0 to 100 |
Percentage of wet gluten retained in the sieve |
Gluten strength |
Glutograph® |
Stretching time |
Time to reach deflection or value after time threshold (shear/stretch angle) |
Gluten extensibility |
Relaxation |
Recovery angle after 10 s of stress removal |
Gluten elasticity |
|
Alveograph |
P |
Maximum pressure (mmH2O) needed to deform the dough till breakage |
Dough tenacity |
L |
Length of the curve (mm) |
Dough extensibility |
|
P/L |
Ratio between P and L |
Balance between dough tenacity and extensibility |
|
W |
Energy (in 10−4 J) required for dough deformation till breakage; area under the curve |
Dough strength |
|
Ie |
Ratio between P200 (i.e., the pressure 4 cm from the beginning of the curve) and the value of P |
Dough elasticity |
|
GlutoPeak® |
Maximum consistency (BEM) |
Maximum height of the peak |
Consistency of gluten upon aggregation |
Peak maximum time (PMT) |
Time required to reach the maximum height |
Time for gluten aggregation |
|
Aggregation energy |
Area from 15 s before to 15 s after the maximum peak |
Gluten strength |
|
Total energy |
Area from 0 s before to 15 s after the maximum peak |
Gluten strength |
|
Mixolab |
Water absorption |
Amount of water to add to semolina to reach an optimal consistency of 1.10 Nm (C1) |
The higher the value, the higher protein quantity/quality |
Development time |
Time needed to reach C1 |
The higher the value, the higher protein quantity/quality |
|
Stability |
Time around C1 where the torque is higher or equal to the real value of C1–C1*11% |
Dough resistance to mixing |
|
Torque C2 |
The lowest point of the curve when the device starts heating the dough |
Weakening of protein |
|
C1–C2 |
Difference between Torque C1 and C2 |
Gluten strength |
|
Torque C3 |
The maximum torque obtained after C2 during the heating phase. |
Starch gelatinization |
|
Torque C4 |
The minimum torque after the holding period at 90°C |
Stability during heating and mixing |
|
Torque C5 |
Torque at the end of the test |
Starch retrogradation tendency |
P, maximum pressure; L, maximum length; P/L, pressure:length ratio; W, area under the curve; Ie, P200/P (P200: pressure at 4 cm from the beginning of the curve).
Although numerous efforts have been made to propose rapid and reliable tests for semolina characterization, the ideal test has yet to be proposed, indicating that researchers and pasta companies need to focus on perfecting the way to assess the quality of durum wheat and pasta.