Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 5641 word(s) 5641 2021-12-02 03:51:56 |
2 format correction -2136 word(s) 3505 2021-12-10 08:50:23 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Wang, M. Electrospun Environment Remediation Nanofibers Using Unspinnable Liquids. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 17 June 2024).
Wang M. Electrospun Environment Remediation Nanofibers Using Unspinnable Liquids. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 17, 2024.
Wang, Menglong. "Electrospun Environment Remediation Nanofibers Using Unspinnable Liquids" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 17, 2024).
Wang, M. (2021, December 10). Electrospun Environment Remediation Nanofibers Using Unspinnable Liquids. In Encyclopedia.
Wang, Menglong. "Electrospun Environment Remediation Nanofibers Using Unspinnable Liquids." Encyclopedia. Web. 10 December, 2021.
Electrospun Environment Remediation Nanofibers Using Unspinnable Liquids

Electrospinning is a simple and straightforward method for preparing nanofibers. Most recently, more and more efforts have been spent on the treatments of liquids without electrospinnability using multifluid working processes. These unspinnable liquids, although have no electrospinnability themselves, can be converted into nanofibers when they are electrospun with an electrospinnable fluid. Among all sorts of multifluid electrospinning methods, coaxial electrospinning is the most fundamental one.

coaxial electrospinning core-sheath nanofibers environmental remediation unspinnable liquid nanocoating

1. Introduction

Electrospinning, a simple and straightforward method for preparing nanofibers [1][2][3][4], is quickly moving forward along two important directions. One is the production on a large scale for potential commercial applications [5][6][7]. The other is the simultaneous treatment of multiple-fluid working fluids for generating nanofibers with complicated nanostructures [8][9][10][11].
Shown in Figure 1, the traditional single-fluid blending electrospinning is differentiating into different sorts of double-fluid and three-fluid processes. Based on the spatial positions, there are two kind of double-fluid electrospinning, i.e., the coaxial electrospinning and the side-by-side electrospinning. As for the three-fluid processes, there are tri-axial process (an abbreviation of tri-layer working fluids organized in a coaxial manner), coaxial process with a side-by-side core, side-by-side process with one coaxial side, and tri-layer parallel side-by-side one. These advanced techniques should greatly expand the capability of electrospinning in generating a wide variety of complex nanostructures.
Figure 1. The development of electrospinning from the traditional one-fluid blending process to the double-fluid coaxial/side-by-side and three-fluid processes.

2. The Modified Coaxial Electrospinning with an Unspinnable Sheath Fluid

In 2002, the first publication about core-shell structure was published based on electrospraying, or electrohydrodynamic atomization, a sister technique of electrospinning [12]. Later, in 2004, coaxial electrospinning was regarded as one of the most important three breakthroughs in this field [13]. In 2008, Moghe & Gupta gave the first review on coaxial electrospinning. Based on the previous publications before this time point, they concluded that the shell working fluids must be electrospinnable for successfully carrying out a coaxial process and for creating a core-shell nanostructure [14]. However, Yu, et al. broke this concept to develop a modified coaxial electrospinning, in which the sheath working fluid could be a pure solvent [15]. The modified process was successfully conducted to generate fibers from a concentrated polymer solution, which was impossible for a single-fluid process owing to the frequent clogging of the spinneret’s nozzle.
Shown in Figure 2, as the differentiation of traditional processes, it can be anticipated that the modified coaxial process can also differentiated into modified tri-axial process and even tri-layer side-by-side process. Most recently, modified tri-axial electrospinning with only one of the three working fluids having electrospinnability was demonstrated to be very useful in generating high quality core-shell nanofibers [16][17]. What is more, the functional sheath’s thickness can be easily manipulated through adjusting the fluid flow rate ratio in a suitable range.
Figure 2. The differentiation of electrospinning from the traditional blending electrospinning to a series of double-fluid and tri-fluid electrospinning methods.
Apparently, the involvement of unspinnable sheath fluid can greatly promote the capability of creating complex nanostructures for functional applications. This is because the spinnable filament-forming polymers are very limited, slightly over 100 kinds by estimation [18], but the un-spinnable liquids are numerous. Thus, the modified coaxial electrospinning provides those materials without filament-forming properties the previous opportunity to taking advantage of the large surface, high porosity and 3D web structure of electrospun nanofiber mats to exert their functional performances. Shown in Figure 3, those unspinnable liquids include solvents, surfactants or salt solutions, and liquids containing functional components. All the liquids are possible to be converted into electrospun nanofibers, regardless of they are solutions, emulsions, nano suspensions or even a slurry.
Figure 3. The differences between the traditional coaxial electrospinning and the modified coaxial electrospinning, and many kinds of unspinnable fluids can greatly enrich the electrospun nanoproducts.

3. The Nanostructures Created by the Modified Coaxial Electrospinning and the Key Parameters for Carrying out the Working Processes

The advantages of modified coaxial electrospinning over the traditional one lies on not only the great treatment capability about unspinnable fluids prepared from numerous raw materials, but also in creating different kinds of nanostructures. Shown in Figure 4 is a comparison between the traditional coaxial and modified coaxial process in generating nanostructures [19]. The traditional coaxial electrospinning can only directly create solid core-shell structures, although which can be utilized to further prepare nanotubes and other derivatives [20]. In sharp contrast, the modified coaxial electrospinning can be exploited for producing core-shell structures, just as the traditional ones [21], but also can be utilized to prepare nanocoating on the core polymeric fibers [22]. What is more, when solvents are explored as the sheath working fluids, modified coaxial electrospinning can be utilized to stabilize the working process [23], keep the working processes from clogging, manipulate the nanofibers’ diameter without the additions of salt or other additives, and systematically improve the nanofibers’ quality.
In the traditional blending electrospinning, the working process is regulated by a series of variables, including the properties of the solution, experimental parameters and surrounding conditions [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The properties of solution further include the viscosity, conductivity, surface tension, molecular weight of polymer and dielectric constant; the operational variables include flow rate, electric field force, distance between needle and receiving screen, diameter and shape of needle, material composition and surface morphology of receiving screen, and so on; the surrounding parameters include temperature, humidity, wind speed, and maybe the vacuum state. But the most important thing is that these different parameters do not exert their impacts on the electrospinning process solely, they are not independent of each other, but interrelated. Thus, although electrospinning is a simple one-step processes, but it is very difficult to be optimized for robust and repetitive preparation.
No matter how many fluids are simultaneously electrospun using the multiple-fluid electrospinning processes, the above-mentioned parameters will similarly influence the working processes and the final products’ quality. The additional key parameter for the modified coaxial electrospinning should be the flow rates of sheath/core working fluids or the sheath-to-core fluid flow rate ratio. This is particularly vital for the modified coaxial electrospinning, in which solvent is exploited as a sheath fluid. Shown in Figure 5 is a diagram about the comparison between a single-fluid electrospinning and a modified process with a sheath solvent [31]. Compared with the former, the latter has a layer of solvent around the core spinnable polymeric solution during the previous stage of the whole electrospinning process, i.e., the Taylor cone, the straight fluid jet, and partial the unstable region. On one hand, the solvent can lubricate the spinneret to prevent clogging, can decrease the negative drawing forces from the capillary’s surface and the capillary forces, and can keep the core fluid from disturbance by the environmental changes. On the other hand, the sheath solvent may result in a failure preparation of linear nanofibers or even a failure of solid products [32].
Figure 5. A diagram showing the solidification processes during (A) the traditional and (B) modified coaxial electrospinning using a solvent as a sheath working fluid [31].
The sheath-to-core fluid flow rate ratio R can be expressed as R = Fs/Fc, where Fs and Fc are flow rates of sheath and core working fluids, respectively. When R is manipulated in a suitable range, the sheath solvent will make positive influences on the whole coaxial working process and benefit the quality of final solid nanofibers. However, when R value is beyond the limitation, i.e., the sheath solvent flow rate is too large, the beads-on-a-string or spindles-on-a-string may be generated. This is because the sheath solvent can’t be completely exhausted in time and in turn influence the solidification of the core fluid [33].

4. The Nanofibers Prepared from Unspinnable Liquids for Environment Remediation

Based on coaxial electrospinning, the applications of electrospun nanofibers from unspinnable fluids for pharmaceutical applications have been broadly reported, which can provide different kinds of drug-controlled release profiles such as immediate release, sustained release and multiple-phase release [34][35][36][37]. However, the publications about their environmental applications are still very limited, the published jobs have demonstrated the usefulness of this advanced electrospinning method in creating novel functional nanostructures for removing heavy metal ions from the polluted water and for antibacterial applications to keep a healthy environment.

4.1. Zein nanoribbons from sheath surfactant solution electrospinning for environmental remediation

It is well-known that biomacromolecules have the potential to become fine adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals [38][39]. Particularly, protein molecules contain numerous groups with lone pairs of electrons and partial negative charges, and these groups allow protein molecules to absorb metal ions through electrostatic interaction and/or chelation. Zein is a typical plant protein, which is naturally abundant and eco-friendly. Shown in Figure 6, the interactions between the metal ions and the protein molecules comprise both the mechanism for modified coaxial electrospinning with unspinnable sheath fluid and mechanism for the ion removement from polluted water. On one hand, during the modified coaxial process, the sheath solution can eliminate the Mn+-protein interactions for avoiding the frequent clogging, and thus ensure a continuous and robust preparation process. On the other hand, during the applications, this interaction is exploited to absorb lead ions from the polluted water for environmental remediation.

Figure 6. The mechanisms for the preparation of electrospun zein nanoribbons using unspinnable surfactant solution as a sheath fluid, and their applications in removing the lead ions from polluted water. Reprinted with permission from [40].
The difference between the traditional single-fluid blending process and the multiple-fluid process mainly lie in how to guide the fluids in an organized manner. Shown in Figure 7a,b are digital photos about the modified coaxial methods for creating zein nanoribbons. The upper-right inset shows a core-shell droplet, in which the core spinnable zein solution consisting of 30 g zein in 100 mL of a 75%/25% (v/v) ethanol/water mixture was surrounded by a transparent and unspinnable sheath fluid composed of 0.5% (w/v) sodium lauryl sulfate in 75%/25% (v/v) ethanol/water. An enlarged image shown in Figure 7b clearly tells the typical three steps of electrospinning, i.e., the compound Taylor cone (the upper-left inset), the straight fluid jet, and the bending and whipping regions with enlarged loops in the instable region.

Figure 7. The working processes of modified coaxial electrospinning (a,b) using unspinnable surfactant solution as a sheath working fluid and the prepared zein nanoribbons (c,d). Reprinted with permission from [40].
Cross-sections of different zein nanoribbons were prepared, which are compared in Figure 7c,d. The former image is zein ribbons prepared using the single-fluid electrospinning. The latter image is zein ribbons created using a modified coaxial electrospinning, in which unspinnable SDS ethanol aqueous solution was exploited as a sheath working fluid. By estimation, the surface area of zein ribbons from the coaxial process was enlarged 2.29 times than those from the single-fluid process, which was favorite for lead ion adsorption. By exploiting the favorable interactions between metal and protein, the zein nanoribbon mats were used to treat Pb2+-polluted water. Adsorption results indicated that the adsorption process can be described using the pseudo-second-order model. Isotherm data fitted well to the Langmuir isotherm model, with a maximum adsorption of 89.37 mg/g for the nanoribbons prepared from the modified coaxial process. Desorption results showed that the adsorption capacity can remain up to 82.3% even after 5 cycles of re-use. These positive results apparently demonstrated that the unspinnable working fluids utilized in the modified coaxial electrospinning were able to stabilize the preparation process, to further downsize the nanoproducts’ width, and to improve their functional performances in environmental remediation.

4.2. Pure solvent as a sheath fluid to create oligomer-loaded functional nanofibers for removing mercury ions

For the traditional single-fluid electrospinning, the filament-forming polymeric matrices must have enough molecular weight to support enough physical entanglements for forming electrospun fibers within their electrospinnable windows [41]. Few reports can be found on the directly electrospun nanofibers of oligomers because they haven’t enough molecular weight and in turn no enough physical entanglements in their working fluids. These oligomers solutions are often un-electrospinnable and can’t be converted into nanofibers.
However, in a recent investigation, an oligomer Poly(2-aminothiazole) (PAT) was synthesized, and then this functional oligomer solution (0.1 g of PAT was dissolved in a mixed solvent of 2 mL DMAC and 2 mL ethanol) was mixed with a cellulose acetate (CA, 1.44 g of CA was dissolved in 8 mL of acetone) solution to create composite nanofibers. The sheath fluid was pure solvent acetone, which was pumped quantitatively through another booster to another inlet of a concentric spinneret for a smooth working process.
Figure 8 shows two representative high-magnification TEM images of the PAT/CA fibers, which clearly present their core-sheath nanostructures. The sheath thickness ranged from 35 to 205 nm, and the core thickness ranged from 105 to 480 nm. The sheath section was mainly composed of small PAT nanoparticles with only few nanoparticles appeared in the core section. This phenomenon is beyond anticipation because there was no any solutes in the sheath working fluid. The resultant core-shell structures should be a reason of solid phase separation during the modified coaxial processes. The concrete forming mechanism is still waited to be further disclosed.
Figure 8. Both (a) and (b) are representative TEM images of 0.1 g PAT/1.44 g CA nanofibers with unexpected core-shell nanostructures. Reprinted with permission from [41].
The Hg(II) adsorption properties of the PAT/CA composite nanofiber mat from polluted water was tested. The adsorption capability was highly dependent on the pH value of solution, with a maximum at pH 6.5. The isotherm data fitted well to the Langmuir isothermal model. The adsorption kinetics data fitted well to the pseudo-second-order model. At a temperature of 298 K, the maximum adsorption capacity of 177 mg/g for PAT/CA fiber membrane with a very low PAT percentage (6.5 wt.%) was calculated. Through conversion, the adsorption capacity of the PAT in the composite fiber membrane is much larger than that of the nanoparticle-type PAT. The desorption experiments revealed that the desorption percentage remained at 80.2% after being used for three times. Here the unspinnable sheath solvent smoothed the electrospinning processes to prevent the spinneret clogging of CA, resulted in solid phase separation to lead to a surface distribution of functional ingredient, i.e., PAT particles, and thus provided an improved functional performance of removing Hg(II) from water. Certainly, the PAT-loaded nanofibers, as a non-woven mat, were more convenient than the PAT powders themselves for environmental remediations and less possibility of secondary pollutions due to nanoparticles themselves.

4.3. Nanocoating of inorganic materials on polymeric fibers for antibacterial applications using unspinnable salt solution as a sheath fluid

Through the modified coaxial electrospinning, it is possible to directly distribute the inorganic particles on the surface of polymeric nanofibers, in which nanosuspension can be explored as the sheath working fluid. Unfortunately, the inorganic nanoparticles are very easy to precipitate during the working processes, which may stop the continuous preparation. However, a combined strategy based on the modified coaxial electrospinning using salt solution as a sheath working fluid can overcome this issue.
With a solution of 15% (w/v) polyacrylonitrile (PAN) in N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) as the electrospinnable core working fluid, a 10% (w/v) AgNO3 DMAc solution was employed as a sheath fluid, a modified coaxial process was successfully carried out to create the salt coating PAN nanofibers. The electrospun nanofibers were then exposed to 254 nm ultraviolet light for 24 h to reduce the Ag+ to Ag nanoparticles (NPs). The prepared products are shown in Figure 9a,b. Both nanofibers have kind linear morphology with the Ag NPs uniformly distributed on the PAN surface. This is very useful for the Ag NPs to exert their functional performances.
The influence of the key parameter, i.e., the sheath-to-core fluid flow rate ratio was investigated. The results demonstrated that the smaller flow rate of AgNO3 solution of 0.1 was not able to follow the core PAN fluid jet during the fast bending and whipping process. This results in a separation of the sheath AgNO3 solution and a non-uniform deposition of AgNO3 on the surface of nanofibers (Figure 9c,d). Thus, a higher sheath-to-core fluid rate ratio of 0.2 was selected to carry out the experiments, which resulted in a more homogeneous distribution of AgNO3 on the surface of nanofibers. When the Ag+ on the surface of PAN nanofibers was reduced to Ag NPs, the nanofibers from a larger sheath fluid flow rate ratio had a more uniform but smaller size, and a tighter distribution than those from a smaller ratio (Figure 9c,e). It is anticipated that reduction of Ag+ to Ag NP on the surface of nanofibers should be beneficial to long-term stability of the system and prevent Ag leaching from the fibers. These Ag NPs-loaded nanofibers showed fine antibacterial performances and should be candidates for friendly ecological environmental applications.

Figure 9.The Ag nanoparticles coating nanofibers (a,b) and the mechanisms for fabricating inorganic nanoparticles distributed PAN hybrids for antibacterial applications (c–e). Reprinted with permission from [42].

The popularity of electrospun nanofibers has a close relationship with their small diameters, huge surface area and large porosity [43][44][45]. However, for a single-fluid electrospinning process, the treated fluids must be electrospinnable to keep the formation of solid linear nanofibers, or they will be degraded into particles or even wet films [31][46]. The modified coaxial electrospinning, with an unspinnable sheath fluid on a spinnable core fluid, can’t be utilized to prepare some advanced nanostructures presently such as hollow fibers from a traditional coaxial processes [47][48], which can be viewed as a special core-shell structure with an empty core. However, all the liquids, containing or not the filament-forming polymers, can be converted as a thin film on the solid core fibers to take advantages of the nanofibers’ unique properties. This give a hint on many new possibilities in future. There are many publications about the environmental applications of electrospun composite nanofibers, in which the guest functional ingredients scattered within host polymer matrices [49][50][51][52]. With the valuable hints from these investigations, new types of nanofibers can be fabricated using the similar raw materials for an improved functional performance. The functional ingredients can be prepared as their owns’ working fluids in the sheath section to superficialize them on the solid hybrid nanofibers. Meanwhile, the pure polymers core may increase the mechanical properties of the core-sheath structures.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

As the fast development of electrospinning, modified coaxial electrospinning is upgraded from the traditional one and shows strong vitality. Its usefulness lies in both stabilizing working process for creating high quality monolithic nanofibers, but also in generating solid core-shell nanostructure and nanocoating. What is more, almost any kinds of functional raw materials, regardless of filament-forming property, can be treated into nanofibers to exert their functional performances by taking advantages of the unique properties of electrospun non-woven mats. The above-mentioned several examples demonstrated that the modified coaxial processes can be utilized to manipulate the nano products’ shape and size facilely, to incorporate oligomer into the nanofibers, and to coat inorganic salt on the surface of polymeric nanofibers. These preparations are impossible using the traditional processes. Based on the combination of modified coaxial electrospinning and the tremendous active ingredients for treating pollutants in our environment, a new platform can be built to develop more and more functional nanostructures for environmental remediation.
The new nanomaterials and the corresponding applications resulted from the modified coaxial electrospinning using unspinnable liquid as a sheath working fluid is still at its infant time period. It is anticipated there are more and more possibilities in future, an unspinnable fluid can be treated with one or more spinnable fluids in many ways such as as tri-axial [53][54] and side-by-side [55]. Electrospinning and the electrospun nanofibers may find their applications in almost all the environmental issues such as gas pollution, water pollution and solid waste. They can also find applications for a better ecological environment, such as producing antibacterial materials, anti-UV materials, noise reduction and electromagnetic shielding [56]. Similarly, modified coaxial electrospinning and the corresponding nanofibers and nanostructures can upgrade these applications and generate new materials from an even wide selections of raw materials such as inorganic NPs, carbon nanotube, graphene and small molecules. In traditional monolithic nanofibers, the active ingredients are homogeneously distributed all over the polymeric matrices, means that most of them are buried into the nanofibers and can’t play their roles for removing the pollutants [57]. With the unspinnable solution as a sheath working fluid, a wide variety of functional ingredients (such as cyclodextrin) can be effectively distributed on the surface of polymeric nanofibers [58][59], and thus their functional performances on environmental remediation can be easily enhanced. Certainly, the modified coaxial electrospinning can further expand its capability of creating novel functional material through a combination with other spinning methods or numerous traditional physical and chemical manners [60][61].
Just as the traditional electrospinning, one of the most important challenges for the modified coaxial electrospinning is to create nanofibers on a large scale [62][63][64]. Another important challenge is get more and more knowledge about the special working processes [65], here the key point is about the unspinnable sheath fluid’s role during the transmission of solvents through air-fluid-fluid interfaces and the related solidification mechanism of electrospun nanostructures. Certainly, the structure-performance relationships for environmental and also other applications based on the nanoproducts prepared using modified coaxial electrospinning should be a very interesting topic deservin.


  1. Cao, R.; Wang, J.N.; Zhao, S.Y.; Yang, W.; Yuan, Z.Q.; Yin, Y.Y.; Du, X.Y.; Li, N.W.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, X.Y.; et al. Self-powered nanofiber-based screen-print triboelectric sensors for respiratory monitoring. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3771–3779.
  2. Lu, X.F.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y. One-dimensional composite nanomaterials: Synthesis by electrospinning and their applications. Small 2009, 5, 2349–2370.
  3. Wang, B.; Sun, Z.M.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.; Du, Z.X.; Li, C.J.; Li, X.Y. The preparation of bifunctional electrospun air filtration membranes by introducing attapulgite for the efficient capturing of ultrafine PMs and hazardous heavy metal ions. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 851–859.
  4. Wu, F.; Li, C.J.; Cao, R.; Du, X.Y. High-performance electronic cloth for facilitating the rehabilitation of human joints. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 22722–22729.
  5. Farkas, B.; Balogh, A.; Cselkó, R.; Molnár, K.; Farkas, A.; Borbás, E.; Marosi, G.; Nagy, Z.K. Corona alternating current electrospinning: A combined approach for increasing the productivity of electrospinning. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 561, 219–227.
  6. Liu, W.C.; Zhang, J.W.; Liu, H. Conductive bicomponent fibers containing polyaniline produced via side-by-side electrospinning. Polymers 2019, 11, 945.
  7. Vass, P.; Hirsch, E.; Kóczián, R.; Démuth, B.; Farkas, A.; Fehér, C.; Szabó, E.; Németh, Á.; Andersen, K.S.; Vigh, T.; et al. Scaled-up production and tableting of grindable electrospun fibers containing a protein-type drug. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 329.
  8. Yu, D.G.; Li, J.J.; Zhang, M.; Williams, G.R. High-quality Janus nanofibers prepared using three-fluid electrospinning. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 4542–4545.
  9. Zhao, Y.; Cao, X.Y.; Jiang, L. Bio-mimic multichannel microtubes by a facile method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 764–765.
  10. Zhao, Y.; Jiang, L. Hollow micro/nanomaterials with multilevel interior structures. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3621–3638.
  11. Zhao, K.; Wang, W.; Yang, Y.Y.; Wang, K.; Yu, D.G. From Taylor cone to solid nanofiber in tri-axial electrospinning: Size relationships. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102770.
  12. Loscertales, I.G.; Barrero, A.; Guerrero, I.; Cortijo, R.; Marquez, M.; Gañán-Calvo, A.M. Micro/nano encapsulation via electrified coaxial liquid jets. Science 2002, 295, 1695–1698.
  13. Dzenis, Y. Spinning continuous fibers for nanotechnology. Science 2004, 304, 1917–1919.
  14. Moghe, A.K.; Gupta, B.S. Co-axial electrospinning for nanofiber structures: Preparation and applications. Polym. Rev. 2008, 48, 353–377.
  15. Yu, D.G.; Li, J.J.; Williams, G.R.; Zhao, M. Electrospun amorphous solid dispersions of poorly water-soluble drugs: A review. J. Control. Release 2018, 292, 91–110.
  16. Liu, X.K.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yu, D.G.; Zhu, M.J.; Zhao, M.; Williams, G.R. Tunable zero-order drug delivery systems created by modified triaxial electrospinning. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 356, 886–894.
  17. Yu, D.G.; Wang, M.L.; Li, X.Y.; Liu, X.K.; Zhu, L.M.; Annie Bligh, S.W. Multifluid electrospinning for the generation of complex nanostructures. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2019.
  18. Yoon, J.; Yang, H.S.; Lee, B.S.; Yu, W.R. Recent progress in coaxial electrospinning: New parameters, various structures, and wide applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704765.
  19. Li, X.Y.; Hai, T.; Wang, Y.T.; Chen, X.; He, Y.Y.; Yu, D.G. Innovation training-from analogy to deepen comprehension and to innovation with modified coaxial electrospinning as an example. Adv. Soc. Sci. Edu. Humanit. Res. 2018, 176, 628–632.
  20. Panthi, G.; Park, M.; Kim, H.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, S.J. Electrospun ZnO hybrid nanofibers for photodegradation of wastewater containing organic dyes: A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 21, 26–35.
  21. Wang, Q.; Yu, D.G.; Zhang, L.L.; Liu, X.K.; Deng, Y.C.; Zhao, M. Electrospun hypromellose-based hydrophilic composites for rapid dissolution of poorly water-soluble drug. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 617–625.
  22. Zhou, H.; Shi, Z.R.; Wan, X.; Fang, H.L.; Yu, D.G.; Chen, X.H.; Liu, P. The relationships between process parameters and polymeric nanofibers fabricated using a modified coaxial electrospinning. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 843.
  23. Wang, M.L.; Hai, T.; Feng, Z.B.; Yu, D.G.; Yang, Y.Y.; Annie Bligh, S.W. The relationships between the working fluids, process characteristics and products from the modified coaxial electrospinning of zein. Polymers 2019, 11, 1287.
  24. Chen, B.Y.; Lung, Y.C.; Kuo, C.C.; Liang, F.C.; Tsai, T.L.; Jiang, D.H.; Satoh, T.; Jeng, R.J. Novel multifunctional luminescent electrospun fluorescent nanofiber chemosensor-filters and their versatile sensing of pH, temperature, and metal ions. Polymers 2018, 10, 1259.
  25. Yew, H.C.; Azari, P.; Choi, R.J.; Muhamad, F.; Pingguan-Murphy, B. Electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers as a reaction membrane for lateral flow assay. Polymers 2018, 10, 1387.
  26. Wu, Y.K.; Wang, L.; Fan, J.; Shou, W.; Zhou, B.M.; Liu, Y. Multi-jet electrospinning with auxiliary electrode: The influence of solution properties. Polymers 2018, 10, 572.
  27. Kim, Y.I.; An, S.; Kim, M.W.; Jo, H.S.; Kim, T.G.; Swihart, M.T.; Yarin, A.L.; Yoon, S.S. Highly transparent, conducting, body-attachable metallized fibers as a flexible and stretchable film. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 790, 1127–1136.
  28. Kim, M.W.; An, S.; Seok, H.; Yoon, S.S.; Yarin, A.L. Electrostatic transparent air filter membranes composed of metallized microfibers for particulate removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 26323–26332.
  29. Yang, Y.Y.; Zhu, T.H.; Liu, Z.P.; Luo, M.Y.; Yu, D.G.; Annie Bligh, S.W. The key role of straight fluid jet in predicting the drug dissolution from electrospun nanofibers. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 569, 118634.
  30. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.C.; Li, H.; Chen, H.B.; Ding, Y.M.; Yang, W.M. Effect of oriented fiber membrane fabricated via needleless melt electrospinning on water filtration efficiency. Desalination 2014, 344, 266–273.
  31. Liu, Z.; Feng, Z.; Zhao, G.; He, C.; Yu, D. Lessons from a key parameter of coaxial electrospinning for engineering education to college students. Adv. Soc. Sci. Edu. Humanit. Res. 2018, 176, 590–593.
  32. Yang, G.Z.; Li, J.J.; Yu, D.G.; He, M.F.; Yang, J.H.; Williams, G.R. Nanosized sustained-release drug depots fabricated using modified tri-axial electrospinning. Acta Biomater. 2017, 53, 233–241.
  33. Huang, W.D.; Yang, Y.Y.; Zhao, B.W.; Liang, G.Q.; Liu, S.W.; Liu, X.L.; Yu, D.G. Fast dissolving of ferulic acid via electrospun ternary amorphous composites produced by a coaxial process. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 115.
  34. Nair, R.P. Delivering combination chemotherapies and targeting oncogenic pathways via polymeric drug delivery systems. Polymers 2019, 11, 630.
  35. Liu, X.K.; Shao, W.Y.; Luo, M.Y.; Bian, J.Y.; Yu, D.G. Electrospun blank nanocoating for improved sustained release profiles from medicated gliadin nanofibers. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 184.
  36. Wang, Q.; Li, H.P.; Yang, C.; Li, J.J.; Yu, D.G. Beads-on-a-string amorphous solid dispersion fabricated using a modified coaxial electrospinning. J. Control. Release 2017, 259, e111–e112.
  37. Li, J.J.; Yang, C.; Li, H.P.; Wang, Q.; Yu, D.G. Oral controlled release in accordance with drug adsorption biological rhythm provided by an electrospun structural amorphous solid dispersion. J. Control. Release 2017, 259, e61–e62.
  38. Hong, J.H.; An, S.; Song, K.Y.; Kim, Y.I.; Yarin, A.L.; Kim, J.J.; Yoon, S.S. Eco-friendly lignin nanofiber mat for protection of wood against attacks by environmentally hazardous fungi. Polym. Test. 2019, 74, 113–118.
  39. Amin, M.T.; Alazba, A.A. A review of nanomaterials-based membranes for removal of contaminants from polluted waters. Membr. Water Treat. 2014, 5, 123–146.
  40. Wen, H.F.; Yang, C.; Yu, D.G.; Li, X.Y.; Zhang, D.F. Electrospun zein nanoribbons for treatment of lead-contained wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 290, 263–272.
  41. Zou, H.; Lv, P.F.; Wang, X.; Wu, D.; Yu, D.G. Electrospun poly(2-aminothiazole)/cellulose acetate fiber membrane for removing Hg(II) from water. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134.
  42. Yu, D.G.; Zhou, J.; Chatterton, N.P.; Li, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, X. Polyacrylonitrile nanofibers coated with silver nanoparticles using a modified coaxial electrospinning process. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5725–5732.
  43. Jiang, S.; Uch, B.; Agarwal, S.; Greiner, A. Ultralight, thermally insulating, compressible polyimide fiber assembled sponges. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 32308–32315.
  44. Sharma, P.R.; Joshi, R.; Sharma, S.K.; Hsiao, B.S. A simple approach to prepare carboxycellulose nanofibers from untreated biomass. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 2333–2342.
  45. Sharma, P.R.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Geng, L.; Amiralian, N.; Martin, D.; Hsiao, B.S. Nanocellulose from spinifex as an effective adsorbent to remove cadmium(II) from water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3279–3290.
  46. Geng, L.; Peng, X.; Zhan, C.; Naderi, A.; Sharma, P.R.; Mao, Y.; Hsiao, B.S. Structure characterization of cellulose nanofiber hydrogel as functions of concentration and ionic strength. Cellulose 2017, 24, 5417–5429.
  47. Duan, G.; Greiner, A. Air-blowing-assisted coaxial electrospinning toward high productivity of core/sheath and hollow fibers. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1800669.
  48. Ouyang, W.; Liu, S.; Yao, K.; Zhao, L.; Cao, L.; Jiang, S.; Hou, H. Ultrafine hollow TiO2 nanofibers from core-shell composite fibers and their photocatalytic properties. Compos. Commun. 2018, 9, 76–80.
  49. Sharma, P.R.; Sharma, S.K.; Antoine, R.; Hsiao, B.S. Efficient removal of arsenic using zinc oxide nanocrystal-decorated regenerated microfibrillated cellulose scaffolds. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 6140–6151.
  50. Sharma, P.R.; Varma, A.J. Functional nanoparticles obtained from cellulose: Engineering the shape and size of 6-carboxycellulose. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8818–8820.
  51. Rajinipriya, M.; Nagalakshmaiah, M.; Robert, M.; Elkoun, S. Importance of agricultural and industrial waste in the field of nanocellulose and recent industrial developments of wood based nanocellulose: A review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2807–2828.
  52. Yu, H.Y.; Zhang, D.Z.; Lu, F.F.; Yao, J. New approach for single-step extraction of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals for their use as adsorbents and flocculants. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2632–2643.
  53. Yu, D.G.; Li, H.P.; Yang, C.; Li, J.J.; Wang, Q.; Williams, G. Double-pulsatile release core-shell fibers fabricated using modified tri-axial electrospinning. J. Control. Release 2017, 259, e24–e25.
  54. Yang, C.; Yu, D.G.; Pan, D.; Liu, X.K.; Wang, X.; Bligh, S.A.; Williams, G.R. Electrospun pH-sensitive core–shell polymer nanocomposites fabricated using a tri-axial process. Acta Biomater. 2016, 35, 77–86.
  55. Yu, D.G.; Yang, C.; Jin, M.; Williams, G.R.; Zou, H.; Wang, X.; Bligh, S.A. Medicated Janus fibers fabricated using a Teflon-coated side-by-side spinneret. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 138, 110–116.
  56. Omura, T.; Chan, C.H.; Wakisaka, M.; Nishida, H. Organic thin paper of cellulose nanofiber/polyaniline doped with (±)-10-camphorsulfonic acid nanohybrid and its application to electromagnetic shielding. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 9446–9452.
  57. Dhandayuthapani, B.; Mallampati, R.; Sriramulu, D.; Dsouza, R.F.; Valiyaveettil, S. PVA/gluten hybrid nanofibers for removal of nanoparticles from water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1014–1021.
  58. Forouharshad, M.; Putti, M.; Basso, A.; Prato, M.; Monticelli, O. Biobased system composed of electrospun sc-PLA/POSS/cyclodextrin fibers to remove water pollutants. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2917–2924.
  59. Wu, H.Q.; Kong, J.H.; Yao, X.Y.; Zhao, C.Y.; Dong, Y.L.; Lu, X.H. Polydopamine-assisted attachment of β-cyclodextrin on porous electrospun fibers for water purification under highly basic condition. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 270, 101–109.
  60. Molnar, K.; Jedlovszky-Hajdu, A.; Zrinyi, M.; Jiang, S.; Agarwal, S. Poly (amino acid)-based gel fibers with pH responsivity by coaxial reactive electrospinning. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2017, 38, 1700147.
  61. Sharma, P.R.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Hsiao, B.S. Efficient removal of UO22+ from water using carboxycellulose nanofibers prepared by the nitro-oxidation method. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 13885–13893.
  62. Agarwal, S.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y. Progress in the field of water-and/or temperature-triggered polymer actuators. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1800548.
  63. Wang, Q.; Yu, D.G.; Zhou, S.Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, M. Fabrication of amorphous electrospun medicated-nanocomposites using a Teflon-based concentric spinneret, e. Polymer 2018, 18, 3–11.
  64. Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Duan, G.; Mei, C.; Greiner, A.; Agarwal, S. Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: A review. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2685–2720.
  65. Ding, C.; Fang, H.; Duan, G.; Zou, Y.; Chen, S.; Hou, H. Investigating the draw ratio and velocity of an electrically charged liquid jet during electrospinning. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 13608–13613.
Subjects: Area Studies
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 469
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 10 Dec 2021
Video Production Service