Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 We established a level-dependent relationship between thiopurines' metabolites and leukopenia, neutropenia, gastrointestinal intolerance, and hepatotoxicity. + 1239 word(s) 1239 2020-07-20 11:01:50

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Sousa, P.; Estevinho, M.M.; Dias, C.C.; Ministro, P.; Kopylov, U.; Danese, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Magro, F. Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 02 December 2023).
Sousa P, Estevinho MM, Dias CC, Ministro P, Kopylov U, Danese S, et al. Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 02, 2023.
Sousa, Paula, Maria Manuela Estevinho, Cláudia Camila Dias, Paula Ministro, Uri Kopylov, Silvio Danese, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Fernando Magro. "Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 02, 2023).
Sousa, P., Estevinho, M.M., Dias, C.C., Ministro, P., Kopylov, U., Danese, S., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., & Magro, F.(2020, August 16). Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity. In Encyclopedia.
Sousa, Paula, et al. "Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity." Encyclopedia. Web. 16 August, 2020.
Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity

Thiopurines (comprising azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and 6-thioguanine) have been used for over 5 decades in the treatment of a myriad of disorders, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), auto-immune hepatitis (AIH), and also in the prophylaxis of rejection in organ transplant recipients. Many questions remain unanswered regarding therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) utility with thiopurines. We performed a systematic review with inclusion of studies evaluating the relationship between thiopurines’ metabolites and drug toxicity. Meta-analysis of mean difference (MD), correlations and odds ratio (OR) was performed. We identified 21,240 records, 72 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Levels of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) were higher in patients with leukopenia (MD 127.06 pmol/8 × 108 RBC) and gastrointestinal intolerance (MD 201.46 pmol/8 × 108 RBC), and lower in patients with hepatotoxicity (MD −40.6 pmol × 108 RBC). We established a significant correlation between 6-TGN and leukocytes (r = −0.21), neutrophils (r = −0.24) and alanine aminotransferase levels (r = −0.24). OR for leukopenia in patients with elevated 6-TGN was 4.63 (95%CI 2.24;9.57). An optimal cut-off of 135 pmol/8 × 108 RBC for leukopenia was calculated (sensitivity 75.4%; specificity 46.4%). 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity (MD 3241.2 pmol/8 × 108 RBC; OR 4.28; 95%CI 3.20; 5.71). Levels of 6-MMPR measured in the first 8 weeks of treatment were associated with leukopenia. We conclude that TDM could be used to prevent thiopurines’ toxicity. As optimal metabolites level may vary according to indication, physicians may adapt posology to decrease toxicity without compromising efficacy.

thiopurines therapeutic drug monitoring adverse events

1. Introduction

Thiopurines (comprising azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and 6-thioguanine) have been used for over 5 decades in the treatment of a myriad of disorders, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), auto-immune hepatitis (AIH), and also in the prophylaxis of rejection in organ transplant recipients [1].

As prodrugs, thiopurines have a complex metabolism which leads to the formation of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN). Regarding conventional thiopurines, other pathways compete with the production of the active metabolite 6-TGN, leading to the formation of 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) and 6-MMP ribonucleotides (6-MMPR). These metabolites can be determined by different methods, such as the Lennard [2] and Dervieux–Boulieu assays [3], that perform the measurement in red blood cells (RBC), with concentrations expressed as pmol/8 × 108 RBC.

2. Thiopurine's toxicity - an overview

Thiopurines present toxicity at distinct levels: myelosuppression, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis and gastrointestinal intolerance, among others. Toxicity is an important cause of treatment cessation; in IBD, about 15% of patients discontinue thiopurines due to adverse events [4] [5]. The toxicity of thiopurines can be divided into dose-dependent and idiosyncratic. Due to the distinct metabolisms, the safety profiles of thiopurines may differ. The most worrisome adverse event of 6-thioguanine is liver nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), which still detracts some physicians from its use [6].

The balance between efficacy and toxicity can be achieved with tailored dosing and monitoring, using a weight-based regimen. However, the dose of thiopurines does not correlate with the levels of metabolites [7]. The level of metabolites, specifically 6-TGN, has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in ALL, renal transplantation, and IBD [8] [9] [10] [11]. An optimal therapeutic range of ~230 to 400 pmol/8 × 108 RBC is often cited for patients with IBD and other disorders [12]. Values of 6-TGN of 450 pmol/8 × 108 RBC and of 6-MMPR of 5700 pmol/8 × 108 RBC were reported as thresholds for myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity, respectively [13] [14]. However, the benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for thiopurines is still uncertain [15]. Based on the risk of myelosuppression, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium recommend genotyping or phenotyping for thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency prior to starting thiopurines [16] [17]. American Gastroenterology Association and proceedings of the first Thiopurine Task Force meeting [6] [15] state that the benefit for routine TPMT testing is still uncertain for most patients, and some real-life studies support this statement [18].

3. Meta-analysis - main results

In our recently published meta-analysis [19], we identified a relationship between thiopurines´ metabolites and several adverse events: i) 6-TGN were associated with leukopenia, neutropenia and gastrointestinal intolerance, and inversely associated with liver toxicity; and ii) 6-MMPR were associated with liver toxicity and early leukopenia.

As myelosuppression has long been linked to 6-TGN, we calculated an optimal 6-TGN threshold (135 pmol/8 × 108) for the occurrence of leukopenia. Although this cut-off is below the therapeutic levels for monotherapy with thiopurines in IBD, it is above the optimal cut-off for the levels demanded in combination therapy. This constitutes an additional argument for using lower doses of thiopurines when the drug is combined with infliximab. Regarding neutrophils and platelets, correlation with 6-TGN was only significant when the analysis was restricted to conventional thiopurines. Scientific evidence indicates that 6-TGN levels derived from 6-thioguanine have a different impact than those resulting from conventional thiopurines. Indeed, low doses of 6-thioguanine can lead to high 6-TGN levels without evidence of myelosuppression [20]. Some explanations can be pointed out for this fact. As most methods do not measure 6-TGN directly, but reduce it to thioguanine, the ingested 6-thioguanine is indistinguishable from 6-TGN, resulting in false high levels of 6-TGN if the drug is ingested close to the assay [21]. In addition, 6-MMPR are not produced with 6-thioguanine. Our results evidenced a possible association of early 6-MMPR assessment (i.e., in the first 8 weeks of treatment) with leukopenia. In previous studies, these metabolites were shown to be cytotoxic and to inhibit purine de novo synthesis, contributing to the antiproliferative properties of these drugs, responsible for both therapeutic and myelotoxic effects [22].

We have also confirmed a positive association of hepatoxicity with 6-MMPR, and a negative association with 6-TGN. In patients who metabolize thiopurines preferentially through the methylation pathway, generating high levels of 6-MMPR (known as “shunters”), dose escalation will not always improve clinical outcomes. This explains thiopurines’ inefficacy despite optimal weight-based dosage [23]. Some strategies can be used to improve the metabolite profile in these patients: i) dose-splitting regimen [24]; ii) addition of allopurinol [1] [24]; or iii) use of 6-thioguanine instead of a conventional thiopurine [20].

Gastrointestinal intolerance to thiopurines is one of the most frequent adverse events with thiopurines treatment, causing many patients to abandon treatment [25]. Some authors postulated that this adverse event could be related to the nitro–imidazole compound released in AZA metabolism to form 6-MP [26]. In this way, 6-MP could be an adequate alternative to AZA treatment in patients experiencing gastrointestinal intolerance, as was demonstrated in some studies [26] [27]. However, we have found that 6-TGN levels were associated with the occurrence of gastrointestinal intolerance. Accordingly, in one of the studies included in the analysis, switch of AZA to 6-MP was only tolerated in a small proportion of patients [28].

4. Implications for patient care

As many thiopurine-associated adverse events are related to the level of metabolites, physicians should take this information into account for dose selection, to achieve the best compromise between efficacy and toxicity. The importance of establishing a clear relationship between metabolite levels and toxicity may also be of value in patients receiving concomitant medications with similar toxicity profiles. In these cases, metabolites’ measurement will help to determine the culprit. The same applies to disorders in which the clinical presentation resembles drug toxicity, as in the case of AIH flares. If the context enables TPMT and nudix hydrolase−15 (NUDT15) screening before starting the treatment to inform on eligibility or drug dosage, subsequent adjustments can be guided by the measurement of metabolites, in a tiered approach [24]. However, at this point, these strategies should be used as adjuncts in clinical practice and cannot yet replace blood and clinical monitoring for early detection of toxicity. A more personalized medicine should overcome the traditional weight-based dosing of thiopurines and rely more on TDM. Still, higher quality studies are needed to confirm this strategy.


  1. Dirk Van Asseldonk; Nanne De Boer; Godefridus Peters; Agnes Veldkamp; Chris Mulder; Ad Van Bodegraven; On Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Pharmacology, Pharmacogenomics, Drug Intolerance and Clinical Relevance. Current Drug Metabolism 2009, 10, 981-997, 10.2174/138920009790711887.
  2. Lynne Lennard; Helen J. Singleton; High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of the methyl and nucleotide metabolites of 6-mercaptopurine: quantitation of red blood cell 6-thioguanine nucleotide, 6-thioinosinic acid and 6-methylmercaptopurine metabolites in a single sample. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications 1992, 583, 83-90, 10.1016/0378-4347(92)80347-s.
  3. T Dervieux; Roselyne Boulieu; Simultaneous determination of 6-thioguanine and methyl 6-mercaptopurine nucleotides of azathioprine in red blood cells by HPLC.. Clinical Chemistry 1998, 44, 551-555, .
  4. Javier Pérez Gisbert; Fernando Gomolln; Fernando Gomollón; Thiopurine-Induced Myelotoxicity in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2008, 103, 1783-1800, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01848.x.
  5. María Chaparro; Ingrid Ordás; Eduard Cabré; Valle Garcia-Sanchez; G. Bastida; Mireia Peñalva; Fernando Gomollón; Esther García-Planella; Olga Merino; Ana Gutiérrez; et al. Safety of Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 2013, 19, 1404-1410, 10.1097/mib.0b013e318281f28f.
  6. Dirk P. Van Asseldonk; Jeremy Sanderson; Nanne K.H. De Boer; Miles Sparrow; Marc Lémann; Azhar Ansari; Sven Almer; Timothy H.J. Florin; Richard B. Gearry; Chris J. Mulder; et al. Difficulties and possibilities with thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease—Proceedings of the first Thiopurine Task Force meeting. Digestive and Liver Disease 2011, 43, 270-276, 10.1016/j.dld.2010.09.001.
  7. Lauren Beswick; Antony B Friedman; Miles Sparrow; The role of thiopurine metabolite monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2014, 8, 383-392, 10.1586/17474124.2014.894878.
  8. J.S. Lilleyman; L. Lennard; Mercaptopurine metabolism and risk of relapse in childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia. The Lancet 1994, 343, 1188-1190, 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92400-7.
  9. L. Lennard; J.S. Lilleyman; ARE CHILDREN WITH LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKAEMIA GIVEN ENOUGH 6-MERCAPTOPURINE?. The Lancet 1987, 330, 785-787, 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92511-6.
  10. Maria Manuela Estevinho; Joana Afonso; Isadora Rosa; Paula Lago; Eunice Trindade; Luís Correia; C. C. Dias; Fernando Magro; on behalf GEDII [Portuguese IBD Group]; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 6-Thioguanine Nucleotide Levels and Clinical Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 2017, 11, 1381-1392, 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx089.
  11. Stein Bergan; Hans E. Rugstad; ??ystein Bentdal; Gunnar S??dal; Anders Hartmann; Torbj??rn Leivestad; Oddvar Stokke; MONITORED HIGH-DOSE AZATHIOPRINE TREATMENT REDUCES ACUTE REJECTION EPISODES AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION. Transplantation Journal 1998, 66, 334-339, 10.1097/00007890-199808150-00010.
  12. Mark T. Osterman; Rabi Kundu; Gary R. Lichtenstein; James D. Lewis; Association of 6-Thioguanine Nucleotide Levels and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity: A Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1047-1053, 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.046.
  13. Marla C. Dubinsky; Stéphanie Lamothe; Hui Ying Yang; Stephan R. Targan; Daniel Sinnett; Yves Théorêt; Ernest G. Seidman; Pharmacogenomics and metabolite measurement for 6-mercaptopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, 705-713, 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70140-5.
  14. Richard B Gearry; Murray L. Barclay; Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine pharmacogenetics and metabolite monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2005, 20, 1149-1157, 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03832.x.
  15. Niels Vande Casteele; Hans Herfarth; Jeffry Katz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Siddharth Singh; American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 835-857.e6, 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.031.
  16. Mary V. Relling; E E Gardner; W J Sandborn; K Schmiegelow; C-H Pui; Sook Yee; C M Stein; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; W E Evans; T E Klein; et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for Thiopurine Methyltransferase Genotype and Thiopurine Dosing. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2011, 89, 387-391, 10.1038/clpt.2010.320.
  17. M V Relling; E E Gardner; W J Sandborn; K Schmiegelow; C-H Pui; Sook Wah Yee; C M Stein; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; W E Evans; J K Hicks; et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for Thiopurine Methyltransferase Genotype and Thiopurine Dosing: 2013 Update. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2013, 93, 324-325, 10.1038/clpt.2013.4.
  18. Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone; Alessandro Adriani; Gian Paolo Caviglia; Amedeo De Nicolò; Danilo Agnesod; Marco Simiele; Danila Riganò; Rinaldo Pellicano; Roberto Canaparo; Giovanni Di Perri; et al. Correlation between Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Genotype and Adverse Events in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.. Medicina 2019, 55, 441, 10.3390/medicina55080441.
  19. Paula Sousa; Maria Manuela Estevinho; Cláudia Camila Dias; Paula Ministro; Uri Kopylov; Silvio Danese; Laurent PeyrinBiroulet; Fernando Magro; Thiopurines’ Metabolites and Drug Toxicity: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020, 9, 2216, 10.3390/jcm9072216.
  20. N. K. H. Boer; P. Graaf; A. J. Wilhelm; C. J. J. Mulder; A. A. Bodegraven; On the limitation of 6-tioguaninenucleotide monitoring during tioguanine treatment. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2005, 22, 447-451, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02581.x.
  21. John A Duley; Timothy H. J Florin; Thiopurine Therapies. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2005, 27, 647-654, 10.1097/01.ftd.0000169061.52715.3e.
  22. T Dervieux; J G Blanco; E Y Krynetski; E F Vanin; M F Roussel; M V Relling; Differing contribution of thiopurine methyltransferase to mercaptopurine versus thioguanine effects in human leukemic cells.. Cancer Research 2001, 61, 5810-5816, .
  23. Marla C. Dubinsky; Huiying Yang; Philip V. Hassard; Ernest G. Seidman; Lori Y. Kam; Maria T. Abreu; Stephan R. Targan; Eric A. Vasiliauskas; 6-MP metabolite profiles provide a biochemical explanation for 6-MP resistance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 904-915, 10.1053/gast.2002.32420.
  24. Sheng Zhang Lim; Eng Wee Chua; Revisiting the Role of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Through Pharmacogenomics and Use of Novel Methods for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2018, 9, 1107, 10.3389/fphar.2018.01107.
  25. Alan G. Fraser; Derek P. Jewell; Side effects of azathioprine treatment given for inflammatory bowel disease-a 30 year audit. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, A787, 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)85289-0.
  26. D.P.B. McGovern; S.P.L. Travis; J. Duley; El M. Shobowale-Bakre; H.R. Dalton; Azathioprine intolerance in patients with IBD may be imidazole-related and is independent of TPMT activity.. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 838-839, 10.1053/gast.2002.32124.
  27. E. Domenech; Pilar Nos; Michel Papo; Antonio López-San Román; Esther Garcia-Planella; Miquel A. Gassull; 6-Mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and previous digestive intolerance of azathioprine. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2005, 40, 52-55, 10.1080/00365520410009492.
  28. Ulf Hindorf; M. Lindqvist; H. Hildebrand; U. Fagerberg; Sven Almer; Adverse events leading to modification of therapy in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2006, 24, 331-342, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02977.x.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , , , , , ,
View Times: 344
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 16 Aug 2020