Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry related to this topic through the link below:
https://encyclopedia.pub/user/video_add?id=15038
Check Note
2000/2000
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 3023 word(s) 3023 2021-08-13 05:31:23 |
2 format correct + 9 word(s) 3032 2021-10-15 03:50:36 |
Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils

The objectives of the study were to test the biological activities of peppermint and spearmint oils via (i) measuring in vitro anti-inflammatory effects with porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs), (ii) determining the barrier integrity of IPEC-J2 by analyzing transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), (iii) testing their antioxidant activities, and (iv) investigating the antimicrobial activity against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) F18+. Briefly, (i) macrophages were seeded at 106 cells/mL and treated (24 h) with mint oils and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The treatments were 2 (0 or 1 μg/mL of LPS) × 5 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 µg/mL of mint oils). The supernatants were collected for TNF-α and IL-1β measurement by ELISA; (ii) IPEC-J2 cells were seeded at 5 × 10 5 cells/mL and treated with mint oils (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL). TEER (Ωcm2) was measured at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h; (iii) the antioxidant activity was assessed (0, 1, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 600 mg/mL) using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and reducing power assays; (iv) overnight-grown ETEC F18+ were quantified (CFU/mL) after supplementing with peppermint and spearmint oils (0, 1.44, 2.87, 5.75, 11.50, and 23.00 mg/mL). All data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure. Both mint oils significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) IL-1β and TNF-α secretion from LPS-stimulated PAMs. Mint oil treatments did not affect TEER in IPEC-J2. Spearmint and peppermint oils exhibited (p < 0.05) strong antioxidant activities in DPPH and reducing power assays. Both mint oils also dose-dependently inhibited (p < 0.05) the growth of ETEC F18+ in vitro. The results of the study indicated that both mint oils are great candidate feed additives due to their in vitro anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial effects. Further research is needed to evaluate their efficacy in vivo.

  • anti-inflammatory
  • antioxidant
  • antimicrobial
  • mint oils
  • pigs
  • transepithelial electrical resistance

1. Introduction

Post-weaning is a critical phase in swine production, where piglets are exposed to a combination of stressors [1] that are associated with fluctuations in gut function and cause different multifactorial diseases [2]. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance [3], antibiotics as growth-promoting agents have been banned in the EU since 2006 [4]. The first adopted alternative to in-feed antibiotics was the widespread application of high doses of zinc oxide, which, despite their antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities, raised concerns related to environmental pollution [5][6]. The use of high-dose zinc in feed may also have contributed to the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as this metal is associated with the co-selection of resistance genes to antibiotics [7][8]. Thus, the EU also recently banned the inclusion of pharmacological levels of zinc oxide in animal feed after 2022 [9]. The role of nutrition and novel functional feed additives and ingredients requires urgent consideration in terms of reducing the use of antibiotics, in order to improve the profitability and to increase the sustainability of agriculture.
Plant extracts are secondary plant metabolites and can be obtained naturally from parts of plant materials, such as flowers, buds, seeds, leaves, twigs, bark, wood, fruits, and roots. Plant extracts are composed of two different forms: liquid oil and solid powder. Liquid plant extracts are water-insoluble and are often referred to as essential oils [10]. Plant extracts are of potential interest because of their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Peppermint (PM, Mentha piperita L.) and spearmint (SM, Mentha spicata L.) belong to the mint (Mentha) genus and are known for their high content of essential oils deposited in the glandular trichomes [17][18] and the abundance of phenolic compounds [14][19]. The activities of mint oils are associated with their individual chemical compositions and different phytochemical constituents that influence their biological functions [10]. Mint oils mostly contain phenolic compounds and flavonoids [20][21][22][23][24] and their therapeutical activities can be thus considered in the treatment of various diseases, such as digestive disorders, diarrhea, intestinal inflammation, and nervous system disorders, in humans and animals [17][20]. Mint oils and their therapeutic potential as feed additives are therefore under investigation for the promotion of health in piglets due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties [25].
In the present study, several in vitro models were adopted to thoroughly evaluate the biological activities of peppermint and spearmint oils. Porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) are lung tissue-resident professional phagocytes that play important roles in the immune responses of pigs [26][27]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge could induce the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines from PAMs [13][28]. Thus, culturing PAMs with LPS challenge has been widely used to test the in vitro anti-inflammatory effects of different bioactive compounds [29][30]. The IPEC-J2 cell line is generated from intestinal porcine enterocytes that are isolated from the middle of the jejunum of neonatal piglets [31] and is commonly used to conduct in vitro research focusing on the intestinal physiology of pigs. When inflammation is enduring, IPEC-J2 cells must form a polarized monolayer in order to maintain barrier function [32]. Measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) across IPEC-J2 monolayers is a valuable tool to evaluate the intestinal barrier integrity in vitro [33]. Furthermore, several chemical-based assays, including the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and reducing power assays, have been widely used to assess antioxidant activities.
The antimicrobial activity of essential oils, particularly mint oils, has been widely evaluated with many pathogenic bacteria due to their bioactive compounds [34][35][36][37][38]. The current study targeted Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) F18, which is one of the most important pathotypes causing post-weaning diarrhea and thus increasing the use of antibiotic treatment in weaned pigs [39][40]. Therefore, the aims of the current study were to test the in vitro biological activities of peppermint and spearmint oils via (i) measuring in vitro anti-inflammatory effects with PAMs, (ii) measuring the barrier integrity of IPEC-J2 by analyzing TEER, (iii) testing the antioxidant activities with two chemical-based assays, and (iv) investigating the antimicrobial activity against ETEC F18+.

2. Results on Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils


2.1. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Mint Oils

Cell viability was evaluated to identify a range of toxicity of mint oils. In the present study, no cytotoxic effects were observed at the highest dose of both mint oils, because all wells showed  76% cell viability compared with control cells without LPS challenge (data not shown). The LPS challenge stimulated (p < 0.001) the production of TNF- and IL-1  (Figures 1 and 2). In the absence of LPS, peppermint oil and spearmint oil differently impacted TNF-  production. Administration of peppermint oil quadratically reduced (p < 0.05) TNF-  production, while spearmint oil linearly inhibited (p < 0.05) TNF-  production from PAMs in the absence of LPS challenge. In the presence of LPS challenge, both peppermint and spearmint oil dose-dependently inhibited (p < 0.001) the production of TNF-  (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Peppermint oil (A) and spearmint oil (B) influenced the production of tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-α; ; pictogram per milliliter) from porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) in the absence or presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cells were incubated with various concentrations (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 g/mL) of each mint oil in the presence or absence of LPS (1 or 0 g/mL) for 24 h. The results were means of values from 6 pigs.

Figure 2. Peppermint oil (A) and spearmint oil (B) influenced the production of interleukin 1beta (IL1-β; pictogram per milliliter) from porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) in the absence or presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cells were incubated with various concentrations (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 μg/mL) of each essential oil extract in the presence or absence of LPS (1 or 0 μg/mL) for 24 h. The results were means of values from 6 pigs.

Both mint oils dose-dependently decreased (p < 0.05) the secretion of IL-1β  from PAMs in the absence of LPS, while no difference was observed in IL-1β  concentration when the highest dose of mint oil was used (Figure 2). The LPS treatment sharply increased (p < 0.05) the secretion of IL-1β from PAMs. Treatment with peppermint or spearmint oils significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) IL-1β secretion from LPS-challenged PAMs in a dosedependent manner (Figure 2).

2.2. Transepithelial Electrical Resistance of IPEC-J2
Cells treated with peppermint and spearmint oils did not exhibit significantly higher transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) across monolayers at each post-treatment time point compared with controls. IPEC-J2 cells did not exhibit a strong dose response to peppermint and spearmint oils at each time point post-treatment (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Peppermint oil (A) and spearmint oil (B) effects on the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of IPEC-J2 cells. The tested doses of peppermint oil (A) and spearmint (B) were 0, 25, 50, 100, 200 g/mL.

2.3. Antioxidant Properties of Mint Oils
The antioxidant activity of the two mint oils was determined by assessing their radical scavenging capacity and reducing power. A dose-dependent increase in radical scavenging activity in 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay was observed in spearmint oil and peppermint oil (Figure 4A,B). The strongest response was observed at the highest concentration (600 mg/mL) of each mint oil. However, the maximal plateau was not observed in the DPPH assay for both mint oils. Thus, EC50 was not detected in either mint oil (Table 1). Both mint oils displayed increased reducing power in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4B). The EC50 was 71.30 mg/mL for both mint oils. Peppermint oil was less active in the DPPH assay compared to spearmint oil, while the reducing power assay revealed equal results for both mint oils.

Figure 4. Dose response of peppermint and spearmint oils using chemical-based antioxidant capacity assays. (A) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity assay and (B) reducing power assay. Data are presented as the mean of 6 observations.

Table 1. The half-maximal effective concentration of peppermint and spearmint oils measured by chemical-based antioxidant activity assays.

Assay2

EC501 (Goodness of Fit), mg/mL

Peppermint oil

Spearmint oil

DPPH scavenging activity

Not detected

Not detected

Reducing power assay

71.30 (0.7765)

71.30 (0.9722)

1EC50 = half maximal effective concentration.

2.4. Escherichia Coli Growth Inhibitory Activity

The growth of the ETEC F18+ strain was tested when treated with different concentrations of peppermint and spearmint oils. The results indicated that ETEC F18+ was sensitive to different doses of mint oils. A dose-dependent effect was observed at each time point for both peppermint and spearmint oil treatments (Figure 5). The highest dose of peppermint oil and spearmint oil (23 mg/mL) showed the maximum inhibitory activity against ETEC F18+ growth at each time point.

Figure 5. Effects of different concentrations (0, 1.44, 2.87, 5.75, 11.50, and 23.00 mg/mL) of peppermint oil (A) and spearmint oil (B) on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F18+ growth in 60 min time intervals (T). Data are expressed as log10 CFU/mL LSMEAN ± SEM (n = 3). Different superscript letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentrations within the same time point.

3. Discussion

The principal objectives of this research were to thoroughly investigate the in vitro biological activity of peppermint and spearmint oils per se by measuring their anti-inflammatory properties, antioxidant effects, and inhibitory activity against ETEC F18+. We also aimed to determine whether both mint oils are able to enhance the in vitro intestinal barrier integrity of the IPEC-J2 cell line.

3.1. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Mint Oils

The results of the present study reported that both peppermint and spearmint oils inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from LPS-stimulated porcine alveolar macrophages, thus demonstrating the high therapeutic potential of these herbs. Moreover, no cytotoxic effects were observed at the highest doses of both mint oils. The MTT results indicated that the anti-inflammatory effects of peppermint and spearmint oils were not due to the direct killing of cells.
Inflammation is a normal protective response that involves removing dead or damaged host cells when tissue injury or infection occurs. The inflammatory response induces the influx of blood leukocytes, oxidative burst, and release of cytokines [17]. These cytokines, mainly produced by macrophages, are crucial regulators of the host immune response [28]. However, under disease conditions, some cytokines may be overproduced and overexpressed, thereby inducing inflammation and increasing disease symptoms [41][42]. The present study revealed that both peppermint oil and spearmint oil reduced the production and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL1-β, from macrophages, in line with previous studies [13][43]. Thus, the induction and inhibition of TNF-α and IL1-β produced by mint oils controls the inflammatory response to inflammation against infection and might be beneficial to the host.
Consistent with previously published research, LPS challenge stimulated the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted from macrophages [13][27][28]. The reduction in TNF-α and IL-1β production from LPS-stimulated porcine alveolar macrophages by peppermint and spearmint oil indicated that both mint oils have strong in vitro anti-inflammatory effects. These observations also agree with previously published research, in which the anti-inflammatory effects of other essential oils and plant extracts were reported [13][43][44][45][46][47]. The potential modes of action are proposed to be strongly associated with the inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway [48][49][50][51].

3.2. Transepithelial Electrical Resistance of IPEC-J2

Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) is a strong indicator of the integrity of cellular barriers and tight junction dynamics in epithelial monolayers [33][52]. Various essential oils may improve epithelial barrier function [53][54][55], although the research regarding the effects of mint oils on intestinal barrier function has been limited. In the current study, mint oil treatments did not affect the TEER of the monolayers of IPEC-J2 cells compared with controls. These results indicate that peppermint and spearmint oils may not affect the intestinal epithelial barrier function of IPEC-J2 cells at the tested doses.

3.3. Antioxidant Properties of Mint Oils

Appropriate levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are important to maintain redox balance; however, the overproduction of ROS and free radicals triggers oxidative stress, which represents an important chemical mechanism leading to cell damage and cell death [56][57]. Plant extracts can be used as antioxidants in animal feed, and they protect animals from the oxidative stress and cellular damage caused by free radicals [10]. The modes of action of antioxidant compounds include (i) scavenging of free radicals by acting as reducers binding to reactive radicals, (ii) metal chelation, (iii) donating hydrogen atoms or electrons, and (iv) inhibiting prooxidative enzymes [58][59]. Hence, the antioxidant effect of essential oils derived from aromatic plant species such as peppermint and spearmint could retard the formation of free radicals and slow or inhibit the autoxidation process [58][59]. In the current study, both mint oils exhibited consistent antioxidative activity, such as radical scavenging capacity and reducing power activity. These observations were consistent with different studies [60][61][62].
The antioxidant activity of plant extracts relies on their chemical compositions [63]. Mint oils contain phenolic compounds and flavonoids [20][21][22][23][24]. These active compounds act as hydrogen or electron donors to the peroxy radicals, thereby impeding hydroxyl peroxide formation and reducing oxidative damage by scavenging free radicals [64][65]. The reducing power assay estimates the capacity of electron donation by mint oils by measuring their effectiveness in reducing ferric iron to its ferrous form [66]. With increased concentrations, both mint oils displayed enhanced reducing power. These findings are also in agreement with previous works on the Mentha genus [67]. Results from the present antioxidant assays are also consistent with another in vitro study, in which different mint oils were evaluated [14].
In brief summary, the current study confirmed the in vitro antioxidant therapeutic activity of peppermint and spearmint oils with two chemical-based assays. In combination with the results of in vitro cellular antioxidant assays [14], we concluded that both mint oils have very promising applications due to their antioxidant activities. However, it is important to consider that the concentration of mint oils used in chemical-based assays may not reflect practical physiological levels when administered in the diet in vivo, and chemical-based assays cannot account for the indirect antioxidant activity in a living organism [14]. Thus, further in vivo study would be needed to justify the antioxidant properties of both mint oils in animal models.

3.4. Escherichia coli Growth Inhibitory Activity

Escherichia coli growth inhibitory activity results demonstrated that peppermint and spearmint oils inhibited the growth of ETEC F18+ in vitro at different concentrations (0, 1.44, 2.87, 5.75, 11.50, and 23.00 mg/mL) and at different time points (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 h). Higher concentrations were not evaluated because the color of the extracts affects the absorbance reading and might produce false results. The inhibitory effects of peppermint oils were observed very rapidly after treatment, while spearmint oil appeared to exhibit a stable growth inhibitory effect throughout the incubation period. Moreover, both mint oils maintained the inhibitory activity until the end of the analysis (6 h). The highest concentration of both mint oils was the most effective dose against ETEC F18+.
The majority of plant extracts are composed of a high level of phenolic compounds, which are responsible for the wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity against a large variety of pathogenic microorganisms, such as Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [68][69][70][71]. The modes of action responsible for the antimicrobial activity of essential oils are due to their hydrophobic nature. Essential oils significantly bypass the lipids of the bacterial cell membranes, disrupting cell wall structures and increasing the permeability of the bacterial cell membrane [72]. Moreover, active components in essential oils may inhibit the development of virulent structures in bacteria [73] or may interrupt the enzyme functions of bacteria associated with their virulence [74]. The antimicrobial mechanism of action varies with the type of essential oils and their composition, the concentration of active substances, and the strain of the tested microorganism [75].
The high growth inhibition of mint oils against different bacterial pathogens has been confirmed in numerous studies. The literature has reported their growth inhibition and antimicrobial activity against Micrococcus luteusSalmonella typhimurium [76]Staphylococcus aureus [77]Escherichia coli [34][77][78][79], and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [79]. Moreover, the study of Muntean et al. [38] highlighted the presence of bactericidal activity on an extensively drug-resistant strain of Escherichia coli. These cases in the literature were in line with our results.
Although the data from the current study need further support from additional studies to evaluate the synergistic effect of both mint oils, the results from the present study are very encouraging and indicate that these herbs should be studied more extensively in the pig industry due to their potential as therapeutic antibacterial agents.

4. Conclusions

A ban on the use of antibiotics as growth-promoting agents in swine production was implemented in the European Union in 2006. Thus, novel additives such as plant extracts and phytochemicals are of interest to replace in-feed antibiotics. The results of the current study emphasize the in vitro anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-microbial activities of two mint oils extracted from peppermint and spearmint. Most importantly, the strong inhibitory effects of both mint oils on ETEC F18+, one of the most common pathogens responsible for post-weaning diarrhea and increased antibiotic treatment, demonstrate that these mint oils are promising candidates to replace antibiotics in feed. Although peppermint and spearmint oils did not affect TEER in IPEC-J2 cells in vitro, this does not exclude their potential impacts on the gut integrity of pigs if overall gut health can be improved in vivo. More research is necessary to further explore the therapeutic potential and future perspectives of essential oils extracted from mint and other herbs to deal with multifactorial diseases in the pig industry.

References

  1. Kim, K.; He, Y.; Xiong, X.; Ehrlich, A.; Li, X.; Raybould, H.; Atwill, E.R.; Maga, E.A.; Jørgensen, J.; Liu, Y. Dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis influenced intestinal health of weaned pigs experimentally infected with a pathogenic E. coli. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 52.
  2. Moeser, A.J.; Klok, C.V.; Ryan, K.A.; Wooten, J.G.; Little, D.; Cook, V.L.; Blikslager, A.T. Stress signaling pathways activated by weaning mediate intestinal dysfunction in the pig. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007, 292, 173–181.
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Principles for the Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance in Animals Intended for Food: Report of a WHO Consultation with the Participation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Office International des Epizooties; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000; pp. 5–9.
  4. European Parliament and the Council. Regulation (EC) 1831/2003 of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition; Off J. L: 268/29; European Parliament and the Council: Strasbourg, France, 2003.
  5. Hejna, M.; Gottardo, D.; Baldi, A.; Dell’Orto, V.; Cheli, F.; Zaninelli, M.; Rossi, L. Review: Nutritional ecology of heavy metals. Animal 2018, 1–15.
  6. Hejna, M.; Moscatelli, A.; Onelli, E.; Baldi, A.; Pilu, S.; Rossi, L. Evaluation of concentration of heavy metals in animal rearing system. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1372–1384.
  7. Seiler, C.; Berendonk, T.U. Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 399.
  8. Yazdankhah, S.; Rudi, K.; Bernhoft, A. Zinc and copper in animal feed-development of resistance and co-resistance to anti-microbial agents in bacteria of animal origin. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2014, 25.
  9. European Medicine Agency (EMA) N° 394961/2017. Questions and Answers on Veterinary Medicinal Products Containing Zinc Oxide to Be Administered Orally to Food-Producing Species; European Medicine Agency: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017.
  10. Liu, Y.; Espinosa, C.D.; Abelilla, J.J.; Casas, G.A.; Lagos, L.V.; Lee, S.A. Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 113–125.
  11. Baydar, N.G.; Özkan, G.; Sagdiç, O. Total phenolic contents and antibacterial activities of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) extracts. Food Control 2004, 15, 335–339.
  12. Dundar, E.; Olgun, E.G.; Isiksoy, S.; Kurkcuoglu, M.; Baser, K.H.C.; Bal, C. The effects of intra-rectal and intra-peritoneal application of Origanum onites L. essential oil on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis in the rat. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008, 59, 399–408.
  13. Liu, Y.; Song, M.; Che, T.; Bravo, D.; Pettigrew, J. Anti-inflammatory effects of several plant extracts on porcine alveolar macrophages in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 2774–2783.
  14. Wu, Z.; Tan, B.; Liu, Y.; Dunn, J.; Martorell Guerola, P.; Tortajada, M.; Cao, Z.; Ji, P. Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of essential oils from peppermint, native spearmint and scotch spearmint. Molecules 2019, 24, 2825.
  15. Caprarulo, V.; Hejna, M.; Giromini, C.; Liu, Y.; Dell’Anno, M.; Sotira, S.; Reggi, S.; Sgoifo-Rossi, C.A.; Callegari, M.L.; Rossi, L. Evaluation of dietary administration of chestnut and quebracho tannins on growth, serum metabolites and fecal parameters of weaned piglets. Animals 2020, 22, 1945.
  16. Dell’Anno, M.; Hejna, M.; Sotira, S.; Caprarulo, V.; Reggi, S.; Pilu, R. Evaluation of leonardite as a feed additive on lipid metabolism and growth of weaned piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 266, 114519.
  17. Dhifi, W.; Bellili, S.; Jazi, S.; Bahloul, N.; Mnif, W. Essential oils’ chemical characterization and investigation of some biological activities: A critical review. Medicines 2016, 3, 25.
  18. Kalemba, D.; Synowiec, A. Agrobiological interactions of essential oils of two menthol mints: Mentha piperita and Mentha arvensis. Molecules 2020, 25, 59.
  19. Park, Y.J.; Baek, S.A.; Choi, Y.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Metabolic profiling of nine Mentha species and prediction of their antioxidant properties using chemometrics. Molecules 2019, 24, 258.
  20. Lv, J.; Huang, H.; Yu, L.; Whent, M.; Niu, Y.; Shi, H.; Wang, T.T.; Luthria, D.; Charles, D.; Yu, L.L. Phenolic composition and nutraceutical properties of organic and conventional cinnamon and peppermint. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1442–1450.
  21. Kapp, K.; Hakala, E.; Orav, A.; Pohjala, L.; Vuorela, P.; Püssa, T.; Vuorela, H.; Raal, A. Commercial peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.) teas: Antichlamydial effect and polyphenolic composition. Food Res. J. 2013, 53, 758–766.
  22. Pereira, E.; Pimenta, A.I.; Calhelha, R.C.; Antonio, A.L.; Verde, S.C.; Barros, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C. Effects of gamma irradiation on cytotoxicity and phenolic compounds of Thymus vulgaris L. and Mentha × piperita. LLWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 71, 370–377.
  23. Bahadori, M.B.; Zengin, G.; Bahadori, S.; Dinparast, L.; Movahhedin, N. Phenolic composition and functional properties of wild mint (Mentha longifolia var. calliantha). Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 183–193.
  24. Ćavar Zeljković, S.; Šišková, J.; Komzáková, K.; De Diego, N.; Kaffková, K.; Tarkowski, P. Phenolic compounds and biological activity of selected Mentha species. Plants 2021, 10, 550.
  25. Omonijo, F.A.; Ni, L.; Gong, J.; Wang, Q.; Lahaye, L.; Yang, C. Essential oils as alternatives to antibiotics in swine production. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 126–136.
  26. Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, K.; Qi, P.; Xu, J.; Wei, J.; Li, B.; Shao, D.; Shi, Y.; Qiu, Y.; et al. Proteomic analysis of the secretome of porcine alveolar macrophages infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Proteomics 2017, 17.
  27. Wang, L.; Hu, S.; Liu, Q.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, X.; He, X. Porcine alveolar macrophage polarization is involved in inhibition of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) replication. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 79, 1906–1915.
  28. Arango Duque, G.; Descoteaux, A. Macrophage cytokines: Involvement in immunity and infectious diseases. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 491.
  29. Islam, M.A.; Pröll, M.; Hölker, M.; Tholen, E.; Tesfaye, D. Alveolar macrophage phagocytic activity is enhanced with LPS priming, and combined stimulation of LPS and lipoteichoic acid synergistically induce pro-inflammatory cytokines in pigs. Innate Immun. 2013, 19, 631–643.
  30. Murphy, K.; Weaver, C. Janeway’s Immunobiology, 9th ed.; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2017.
  31. Berschneider, H.M. Development of normal cultured small intestinal epithelial cell lines which transport Na and Cl. Gastroenterology 1989, 96 Pt 2, A41.
  32. Groschwitz, K.R.; Hogan, S.P. Intestinal barrier function: Molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 3–22.
  33. Chen, S.; Einspanier, R.; Schoen, J. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER): A functional parameter to monitor the quality of oviduct epithelial cells cultured on filter supports. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 144, 509–515.
  34. Inouye, S.; Takizawa, T.; Yamaguchi, H. Antibacterial activity of essential oils and their major constituents against respiratory tract pathogens by gaseous contact. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001, 47, 565–573.
  35. Sharafi, S.M.; Rasooli, I.; Owlia, P.; Taghizadeh, M.; Astaneh, S.D. Protective effects of bioactive phytochemicals from Mentha piperita with multiple health potentials. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2010, 6, 147–153.
  36. Lopez-Romero, J.C.; González-Ríos, H.; Borges, A.; Simões, M. Antibacterial effects and mode of action of selected essential oils components against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med. 2015, 795435.
  37. Marjanović-Balaban, Ž.; Stanojević, L.; Kalaba, V.; Stanojević, J.; Cvetković, D.; Cakić, M.; Gojković, V. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Menthae piperitae L. Qual. Life 2018, 9, 5–12.
  38. Muntean, D.; Licker, M.; Alexa, E.; Popescu, I.; Jianu, C.; Buda, V.; Dehelean, C.A.; Ghiulai, R.; Horhat, F.; Horhat, D.; et al. Evaluation of essential oil obtained from Mentha × piperita L. against multidrug-resistant strains. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 13, 2905–2914.
  39. Rossi, L.; Di Giancamillo, A.; Reggi, S.; Domeneghini, C.; Baldi, A.; Sala, V. Expression of verocytotoxic Escherichia coli antigens in tobacco seeds and evaluation of gut immunity after oral administration in mouse model. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 14, 263–270.
  40. Giromini, C.; Cheli, F.; Rebucci, R.; Baldi, A. Invited review: Dairy proteins and bioactive peptides: Modeling digestion and the intestinal barrier. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 929–942.
  41. Friedrich, M.; Pohin, M.; Powrie, F. Cytokine networks in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunity 2019, 50, 992–1006.
  42. Kany, S.; Vollrath, J.T.; Relja, B. Cytokines in inflammatory disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6008.
  43. Azab, A.; Nassar, A.; Azab, A.N. Anti-inflammatory activity of natural products. Molecules 2016, 21, 1321.
  44. Salud Pérez, G.; Miguel Zavala, S.; Lucina Arias, G.; Miguel Ramos, L. Anti-inflammatory activity of some essential oils. J. Essent. Oil. Res. 2011, 23, 5–38.
  45. Sun, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, L.; Yang, P. Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of essential oil from leaves of Mentha piperita grown in China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114767.
  46. Wang, Y.T.; Zhu, L.; Zeng, D.; Long, W.; Zhu, S.M. Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oil from Trachydium roylei. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016, 24, 602–609.
  47. Mogosan, C.; Vostinaru, O.; Oprean, R.; Heghes, C.; Filip, L.; Balica, G.; Moldovan, R.I. A comparative analysis of the chemical composition, anti-inflammatory, and antinociceptive effects of the essential oils from three species of Mentha cultivated in Romania. Molecules 2017, 22, 263.
  48. Choi, C.Y.; Park, K.R.; Lee, J.H.; Jeon, Y.J.; Liu, K.H.; Oh, S. Isoeugenol suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression is mediated by down-regulation of NF-kappaB, ERK1/2, and p38 kinase. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 8, 151–159.
  49. Lawrence, T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. 2009, 1, 001651.
  50. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal. Transduct. Target Ther. 2017, 2, 17023.
  51. Dorrington, M.G.; Fraser, I.D.C. NF-κB signaling in macrophages: Dynamics, crosstalk, and signal integration. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 705.
  52. Srinivasan, B.; Kolli, A.R.; Esch, M.B.; Abaci, H.E.; Shuler, M.L.; Hickman, J.J. TEER measurement techniques for in vitro barrier model systems. J. Lab. Autom. 2015, 20, 107–126.
  53. Wan, M.L.; Ling, K.H.; Wang, M.F.; El-Nezami, H. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate improves epithelial barrier function by inducing the production of antimicrobial peptide pBD-1 and pBD-2 in monolayers of porcine intestinal epithelial IPEC-J2 cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 1048–1058.
  54. Omonijo, F.A.; Liu, S.; Hui, Q.; Zhang, H.; Lahaye, L.; Bodin, J.C.; Gong, J.; Nyachoti, M.; Yang, C. Thymol improves barrier function and attenuates inflammatory responses in porcine intestinal epithelial cells during lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 16, 615–624.
  55. Hui, Q.; Ammeter, E.; Liu, S.; Yang, R.; Lu, P.; Lahaye, L.; Yang, C. Eugenol attenuates inflammatory response and enhances barrier function during lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in the porcine intestinal epithelial cells. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 1, 245.
  56. Poljsak, B.; Šuput, D.; Milisav, I. Achieving the balance between ROS and antioxidants: When to use the synthetic antioxidants. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 956792.
  57. Di Meo, S.; Reed, T.T.; Venditti, P.; Victor, V.M. Role of ROS and RNS sources in physiological and pathological conditions. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 1245049.
  58. Amorati, R.; Foti, M.C.; Valgimigli, L. Antioxidant activity of essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10835–10847.
  59. Brown, N.; John, J.A.; Shahidi, F. Polyphenol composition and antioxidant potential of mint leaves. Food Prod. Process Nutr. 2019, 1, 1.
  60. Dorman, H.J.D.; Kosar, M.; Kahlos, K.; Holm, Y.; Hiltunen, R. Antioxidant properties and composition of aqueous extracts from mentha species, hybrids, varieties, and cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4563–4569.
  61. Schmidt, E.; Bail, S.; Buchbauer, G.; Stoilova, I.; Atanasova, T.; Stoyanova, A.; Krastanov, A.; Jirovetz, L. Chemical composition, olfactory evaluation and antioxidant effects of essential oil from Mentha × piperita. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1107–1112.
  62. Naidu, J.R.; Ismail, R.; Yeng, C.; Sasidharan, S.; Kumar, P. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the crude methanolic extracts of Mentha spicata. J. Phytol. 2012, 4, 13–18.
  63. Teissedre, P.L.; Waterhouse, A.L. Inhibition of oxidation of human low-density lipoproteins by phenolic substances in different essential oils varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3801–3805.
  64. Djeridane, A.; Yousfi, M.; Nadjemi, B.; Boutassouna, D.; Stocker, P.; Vidal, N. Antioxidant activity of some algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 654–660.
  65. Krzyzanowska, J.; Janda, B.; Pecio, L.; Stochmal, A.; Oleszek, W.; Czubacka, A.; Przybys, M.; Doroszewska, T. Determination of polyphenols in Mentha Longifolia and M. Piperita field-grown and in vitro plant samples using UPLC-TQ-MS. J. AOAC Int. 2011, 94, 43–50.
  66. Teixeira, B.; Marques, A.; Ramos, C.; Neng, N.R.; Nogueira, J.M.; Saraiva, J.A.; Nunes, M.L. Chemical composition and antibacterial and antioxidant properties of commercial essential oils. Ind. Crop Prod. 2013, 43, 587–595.
  67. Nickavar, B.; Alinaghi, A.; Kamalinejad, M. Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of five mentha species. Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 10, 203–209.
  68. Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316.
  69. Pichersky, E.; Noel, J.P.; Dudareva, N. Biosynthesis of plant volatiles: Nature’s diversity and ingenuity. Science 2006, 311, 808–811.
  70. Wong, S.Y.; Grant, I.R.; Friedman, M.; Elliott, C.T.; Situ, C. Antibacterial activities of naturally occurring compounds against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5986–5990.
  71. Degenhardt, J.; Kollner, T.G.; Gershenzon, J. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene synthases and the origin of terpene skeletal diversity in plants. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1621–1637.
  72. Cosentino, S.C.I.G.; Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Pisano, B.; Satta, M.L.; Mascia, V.; Arzedi, E.; Palmas, F. In vitro antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Sardinian Thymus essential oils. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 29, 130–135.
  73. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foodsea review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253.
  74. Ankri, S.; Mirelman, D. Antimicrobial properties of allicin from garlic. Microbes Infect. 1999, 1, 125–129.
  75. Salehi, B.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.; Matejić, J.; Sharopov, F.; Antolak, H.; Kręgiel, D.; Sen, S.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Acharya, K.; Sharifi-Rad, R.; et al. Plants of genus mentha: From farm to food factory. Plants 2018, 7, 70.
  76. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential oils in food preservation: Mode of action, synergies and interactions with food matrix components. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 12.
  77. Sokovic, M.D.; Vukojevic, J.; Marin, P.D.; Brkic, D.D.; Vajs, V.; van Griensven, L.J. Chemical composition of essential oils of Thymus and Mentha species and their antifungal activities. Molecules 2009, 14, 238–249.
  78. Aridogan, B.C.; Baydar, H.; Kaya, S.; Demirci, M.; Ozbasar, D.; Mumcu, E. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of some essential oils. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2002, 25, 860–864.
  79. Işcan, G.; Kirimer, N.; Kürkcüoğlu, M.; Başer, K.H.; Demirci, F. Antimicrobial screening of Mentha piperita essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 3, 3943–3946.
More
Information
Contributor :
View Times: 49
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Time: 15 Oct 2021
Table of Contents

    Confirm

    Are you sure to Delete?

    Video Upload Options

    Do you have a full video?
    Cite
    If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
    Hejna, M. Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15038 (accessed on 25 June 2022).
    Hejna M. Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15038. Accessed June 25, 2022.
    Hejna, Monika. "Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils," Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15038 (accessed June 25, 2022).
    Hejna, M. (2021, October 14). Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/15038
    Hejna, Monika. ''Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Mint Oils.'' Encyclopedia. Web. 14 October, 2021.
    Share
    Download
    Cite
    Top