Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 944 word(s) 944 2021-08-13 04:12:31 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 944 2021-08-13 05:43:44 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Wu, S. S. Enteritidis on Chicken Eggshells. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13128 (accessed on 21 December 2024).
Wu S. S. Enteritidis on Chicken Eggshells. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13128. Accessed December 21, 2024.
Wu, Shuyan. "S. Enteritidis on Chicken Eggshells" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13128 (accessed December 21, 2024).
Wu, S. (2021, August 13). S. Enteritidis on Chicken Eggshells. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13128
Wu, Shuyan. "S. Enteritidis on Chicken Eggshells." Encyclopedia. Web. 13 August, 2021.
S. Enteritidis on Chicken Eggshells
Edit

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is a pathogen that poses a health risk. Shell eggs have been reported as one of the principal vehicles for the transmission of bacterial pathogens. The cuticle on eggshells (the organic layer of freshly laid egg) is damaged during extended storage of the egg, leading to the penetration of pathogens attached to the eggshell surface and in the surrounding environment. Therefore, effective disinfection on eggshells is urgently required to maintain good quality egg products by preventing bacterial contaminants from entering eggs.

Salmonella enteritidis blue light inactivation eggshell freshness

1. Overview

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is a pathogen that poses a health risk. Blue light (BL), an emerging sanitization technology, was employed for the first time in the present study to inactivate S. Enteritidis on eggshell surfaces and its influence on maintaining eggshell freshness was investigated systematically. The results showed that 415 nm-BL irradiation at a dose of 360 J/cm2 reduced 5.19 log CFU/mL of S. Enteritidis in vitro. The test on eggshells inoculated with S. Enteritidis showed that a BL dose at 54.6 J/cm2 caused a 3.73 log CFU reduction per eggshell surface and the impact of BL inactivation could be sustained in post-5-week storage. The quality of the tested eggs (weight loss, yolk index, Haugh unit (HU) and albumen pH) demonstrated that BL treatments had negligible effects on the albumen pH of eggs. However, compared to the control, BL-treated eggs showed lower weight loss and higher HU after 5 weeks of storage at 25 °C and 65% humidity and yolk index in the control group could not be determined after 5 weeks of storage. Besides, the total amino acid content of the BL-treated egg was higher than the control, exhibiting an advantage of BL irradiation in maintaining the nutrient quality of whole eggs. The current study determined the efficacy of BL against S. Enteritidis on eggshell and suggested that BL could be an effective application in maintaining the freshness and quality of eggs.

2. Salmonella Enterica Serovar Enteritidis

Chicken eggs are popular foodstuff worldwide due to their valuable nutrients, such as complete protein, including all essential amino acids, easily digestible fats, vitamins (A, B2, B6, B9 and B12) and minerals (iron, calcium and potassium) [1]. According to the data provided by FAOSTAT, the production of eggs hen in shell, in 2019, was 83,483,675 tons and, according to a report from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, global egg production will reach 89 million tons by 2030 [2]. However, poultry-borne pathogens lead to food poisoning in consumers and considerable egg loss and waste. Especially, Salmonella-contaminated eggs and egg-derived products contribute to many salmonellosis cases [3]. Salmonella strains have been frequently isolated from eggshell pieces and different serovars have been linked with egg contamination [4]. Among the Salmonella strains, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is frequently recovered from contaminated grade A eggs.
Shell eggs have been reported as one of the principal vehicles for the transmission of bacterial pathogens [5]. The cuticle on eggshells (the organic layer of freshly laid egg) is damaged during extended storage of the egg, leading to the penetration of pathogens attached to the eggshell surface and in the surrounding environment. Therefore, effective disinfection on eggshells is urgently required to maintain good quality egg products by preventing bacterial contaminants from entering eggs.
Nowadays, several antimicrobial approaches have been reported to disinfect S. Enteritidis in eggshells, including ultraviolet C (200–280 nm) [3][6][7], H2O2 [8], ozone [9] and slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) [10], but their applications are limited by disadvantages such as photoreactivation, decolorization in certain products at high doses and harmful effects on human [11]. Blue light (BL), especially in the wavelength range of 405–470 nm, has attracted increasing interest because of its intrinsic antimicrobial property [11]. BL excited the endogenous intracellular porphyrins, leading to the production of highly cytotoxic reactive oxygen species and the following cell damage of bacteria [11][12]. BL is considered to be less detrimental to mammalian cells and human skin cells than ultraviolet irradiation [11]. Moreover, it can penetrate deeper than ultraviolet C [11]. Up to now, BL had been successfully applied in disinfection of some food, including cantaloupe rinds [13], fresh-cut papaya [14], milk [15], cucumbers, processed meat products [16] and packaged sliced cheese [17]. Our previous study demonstrated that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Cronobacter sakazakii were decreased by 6 log CFU/mL and 8 log CFU/mL under 415-nm BL illumination of 80 and 240.48 J/cm2, respectively and the outer-membrane damage and lipid oxidation were induced by BL irradiation [12][18]. However, up to now, the efficacy of BL on shell egg disinfection has not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to verify the effectiveness of BL in inactivating S. Enteritidis on eggshells and to explore the effect of BL inactivating S. Enteritidis in maintaining the freshness and quality of eggs.

3. Conclusions

The current study evaluated the efficiency of 415-nm BL in egg disinfection and systematically evaluated its influence on egg freshness during 5-week storage. It showed that a BL dose of 360 J/cm2 led to a 5.19 log CFU/mL reduction in S. Enteritidis in vitro and 54.6 J/cm2 of BL illumination led to a reduction of 3.73 log CFU/eggshell on shell eggs. The remaining S. Enteritidis population on eggshells after BL treatment had no significant growth during the 5-week storage. The investigation also showed that 54.6 J/cm2 of BL illumination with applied dose did not have significant detrimental impact on the quality of whole eggs. The dynamic changes of albumen pH were similar in BL-treated and control group. The decreases in egg weight, yolk index, HU and total amino acid contents were slowed down by BL illumination. The current findings suggested that the 415 nm BL could be an effective application of S. Enteritidis decontamination on eggshell with potential of maintaining the quality of egg albumen.

References

  1. Adeyeye, E.I. Nutritional values of the lipid composition of the free-range chicken eggs. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2012, 3, 374–384.
  2. Magdelaine, P.; Braine, A.; Gonnier, V.; Spiess, M.P. Science et Technologie de L’oeuf et des Ovoproduits; Nau, F., Guérin-Dubiard, C., Baron, F., Eds.; Editions Tec et Doc Lavoisier: Paris, France, 2010; pp. 1–36.
  3. Bing, S.; Zang, Y.T.; Li, Y.J.; Shu, D.Q. The synergistic effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and UV-C light on the inactivation of Salmonella enteritidis on contaminated eggshells. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6914–6920.
  4. Kawasaki, T.; Musgrove, M.T.; Murata, M.; Tominaga, N.; Kawamoto, S. Comparative study of shell swab and shell crush methods for the recovery of Salmonella from shell eggs. J. Food Saf. 2008, 28, 482–498.
  5. Painter, J.A.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Ayers, T.; Tauxe, R.V.; Braden, C.R.; Angulo, F.J.; Griffin, P.M. Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998–2008. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 407–415.
  6. Holck, A.L.; Liland, K.H.; Dromtorp, S.M.; Carlehog, M.; Mc, L.A. Comparison of UV-C and pulsed UV light treatments for reduction of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli on eggs. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 6–16.
  7. Keklik, N.M.; Demirci, A.; Patterson, P.H.; Puri, V.M. Pulsed UV light inactivation of Salmonella Enteritidis on eggshells and its effects on egg quality. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 1408–1415.
  8. Al-Ajeeli, M.N.; Taylor, T.M.; Alvarado, C.Z.; Coufal, C.D. Comparison of eggshell surface sanitization technologies and impacts on consumer acceptability. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1191–1197.
  9. Rodriguez-Romo, L.A.; Yousef, A.E. Inactivation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis on shell eggs by ozone and UV radiation. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 711–717.
  10. Zang, Y.T.; Bing, S.; Li, Y.J.; Shu, D.Q.; Huang, A.M.; Wu, H.X.; Lan, L.T.; Wu, H.D. Efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the microbial safety and shelf life of shelled eggs. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5932–5939.
  11. Dai, T.; Gupta, A.; Murray, C.K.; Vrahas, M.S.; Tegos, G.P.; Hamblin, M.R. Blue light for infectious diseases: Propionibacterium acnes, Helicobacter pylori, and beyond? Drug Resist. Updates 2012, 15, 223–236.
  12. Chu, Z.; Hu, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.; Dai, T.; Wang, X. Inactivation of Cronobacter sakazakii by blue light illumination and the resulting oxidative damage to fatty acids. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019, 65, 922–929.
  13. Josewin, S.W.; Kim, M.J.; Yuk, H.G. Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. on cantaloupe rinds by blue light emitting diodes (LEDs). Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 219–225.
  14. Kim, M.J.; Bang, W.S.; Yuk, H.G. 405 ± 5 nm light emitting diode illumination causes photodynamic inactivation of Salmonella spp. on fresh-cut papaya without deterioration. Food Microbiol. 2017, 62, 124–132.
  15. Dos Anjos, C.; Sellera, F.P.; de Freitas, L.M.; Gargano, R.G.; Telles, E.O.; Freitas, R.O.; Baptista, M.S.; Ribeiro, M.S.; Lincopan, N.; Pogliani, F.C.; et al. Inactivation of milk-borne pathogens by blue light exposure. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 103, 1261–1268.
  16. Guffey, J.S.; Payne, W.C.; Motts, S.D.; Towery, P.; Hobson, T.; Harrell, G.; Meurer, L.; Lancaster, K. Inactivation of Salmonella on tainted foods: Using blue light to disinfect cucumbers and processed meat products. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 4, 878–887.
  17. Hyun, J.E.; Lee, S.Y. Antibacterial effect and mechanisms of action of 460–470nm light-emitting diode against Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas fluorescens on the surface of packaged sliced cheese. Food Microbiol. 2020, 86, 103314.
  18. Wu, J.; Chu, Z.; Ruan, Z.; Wang, X.; Dai, T.; Hu, X. Changes of intracellular porphyrin, reactive oxygen species, and fatty acids profiles during inactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by antimicrobial blue light. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1658.
More
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 592
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 13 Aug 2021
1000/1000
Video Production Service