Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Awad A Shehata
 + 2466 word(s) 2466 2021-07-12 10:44:20 |
2 Reference formatted + formatting
Ron Wang
 + 110 word(s) 2576 2021-08-02 09:36:52 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Shehata, A. Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/12645 (accessed on 18 November 2024).
Shehata A. Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/12645. Accessed November 18, 2024.
Shehata, Awad. "Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/12645 (accessed November 18, 2024).
Shehata, A. (2021, August 02). Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/12645
Shehata, Awad. "Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome." Encyclopedia. Web. 02 August, 2021.
Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ani11072063

The poult enteritis complex (PEC) is common in turkeys and characterized by depression, enteritis, diarrhea, low feed conversion ratio and poor weight gain. It is a general term denoting all infectious intestinal diseases of young poults with uncertain etiology. The PEC is caused by a group of multifactorial infectious and non-infectious agents with significant effect on turkeys less than six weeks old.

turkeys PEMS astroviruses coronaviruses rotaviruses probiotics prebiotics phytogenic substances

1. Introduction

Several challenges such as intense global competition between producing countries, permanent changes in social, political and consumer perceptions regarding food safety, animal welfare and environmental protection are influencing turkey production and health [1]. Mechanical, chemical or biological disturbance of the digestive system usually negatively impacts this process, which is subsequently accompanied by high economic losses, serious problems are predominant in young birds [2]. In poultry, several viral infections either as monocausal, multicausal or viral infections accompanied by non-infectious factors are indeed causing high economic losses worldwide. These economic losses are due to high mortality rates and reduction of animal performance as a result of decreased weight gain, decreased egg production, decreased hatchability, increased medication costs and impaired feed conversion rates [3].

The poult enteritis complex (PEC) is common in turkeys and characterized by depression, enteritis, diarrhea, low feed conversion ratio and poor weight gain. It is a general term denoting all infectious intestinal diseases of young poults with uncertain etiology [4]. The PEC is caused by a group of multifactorial infectious and non-infectious agents with significant effect on turkeys less than six weeks old [5]. Several syndromes were reported as a part of PEC such as the poult enteritis and mortality syndrome (PEMS), maldigestion syndrome, runting stunting syndrome (RSS), poult malabsorption syndrome, spiking mortality of turkeys (SMT), poult enteritis syndrome (PES) in young turkeys between 1 day and 7 weeks and light turkey syndrome (LTS), a problem of lower body weight at market age turkeys [6][7].

Several causative agents are implicated as the main causes of PEMS such as enteroviruses (turkey corona virus (TCoV), turkey astroviruses (TAstV), reoviruses and adenoviruses)), and also bacteria such asE. coli,Salmonella,Campylobacter,Clostridia,CryptosporidiumandCochlosoma[5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The severity of the disease depends on the virulence of enteric viruses, coinfections, other interacting factors such as the age and immune status of the affected birds [15] and management, nutrition and hygienic measures (Table 1). Therefore, the true role of viruses in naturally occurring PEMS is difficult to assess as sole etiologies [16]. In this review, we will discuss the possible causes, diagnosis, and preventive measures of PEMS as a major challenge facing turkey production.

Table 1. Possible causes of enteric disorders in turkeys.
Infectious Viral Newcastle disease virus (Paramyxoviridae)
Avian influenza A (Orthomyxoviridae)
Infectious bursal disease virus (Birnaviridae)
Hemorrhagic enteritis virus (Adenoviridae)
Coronavirus enteritis (Coronaviridae)
Rotavirus (Reoviridae)
Reovirus (Orthoreoviridae)
Astrovirus (Astroviridiae)
Enterovirus (Picornaviridae)
Parvovirus (Parvoviridae)
Bacterial Salmonella spp.
E. coli
Clostridia spp.
Chlamydia spp.
Mycotic Candida
Parasitic Ascaridia
Coccidia
Non-infectious Nutritional Feed structure, palatability, energy content and pellet quality
Management Temperature, stocking density, available feed space, available water space, distribution of feeders and air quality

2. Causes of PEMS

Later on, the virus was reported in several countries worldwide including Australia, Brazil, Italy, UK, France and Poland [17][18][19][20][21][22]. TCoV infections remain a leading cause of massive economic losses in young turkeys in many countries [23]. The γCoV contains three subgenera, namely,IgacovirusandBrangacovirus, both identified in birds, andCegacovirus, reported in mammals (beluga whale, SW1 virus) [24]. TCoV belongs to the genus γCoV and subgenusIgacovirus, which contains other avian coronaviruses (ACoVs) such as infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and guinea fowl coronavirus (GfCoV).

Generally, ACoVs have similar phylogenetic relationships and genomic structures and close nucleotide identities. The IBV, TCoV and GfCoV exhibited nucleotide identities of 90% for the replicase, E, M and N genes [25][26][27]. Three distinct genetic groups of TCoV isolates in USA were identified, namely, in North Carolina isolates formed group I, Texas isolates formed group II, and Minnesota isolates formed group III, suggesting the endemic circulation of distinct TCoV genotypes in different geographic states [28]. Molecular analysis revealed recombination between different γCoV genomic backbones, suggested potential transmission of coronaviruses between different bird species [29].

TCoV causes high morbidity rates that may reach 100% and a sudden increase in mortality of 10–50% in turkeys during the first 4 weeks of age. Although TCoV is more common in young poults, exposure of older ages results in stunting with low mortality rates [30]. The natural route of infection of TCoV is orally by ingestion of contaminated fecal materials. Movement of contaminated equipment, personal or vehicles and other birds probably spread the virus.

Post-mortem lesions are mainly found in the GIT and bursa of Fabricius. Atrophy of the bursa of Fabricius may also be observed. Microscopic lesions include villus atrophy, infiltration with mononuclear inflammatory cells in the lamina propria and decreased numbers of goblet cells on villous tips. Lymphoid atrophy of follicular cells of bursa of Fabricius and heterophilic infiltration are also reported [9][31][32].

TAstV infections are common in 4-week-old turkey poults as a coinfection in enteric disease. Three astrovirus types, namely, TAstV-1 (7003 nt), TAstV-2 (7325 nt) and avian nephritis virus (ANV, 6927 nt) have been detected in commercial turkey flocks, with a prevalence of 100, 15.4 and 12.5%, respectively. Additionally, TAstV-2 has been detected in apparently healthy flocks of turkeys [33][34]. The ANV is associated with nephritis and RSS in chicken and turkey flocks and other avian species [35].

turkey poults decreased the absorption of D-xylose [36], resulting in maldigestion of disaccharides, malabsorption and consequent osmotic diarrhea [37]. It was also found that 24 h after experimental infections of one-day-old turkey poults, birds showed signs of intestinal infection including yellowish brown watery to foamy diarrhea, followed by emaciation and stunting growth [38][39]. Significant reduction of body weights as a result of decreased absorption of nutrients was also found [39]. The main pathological changes are mainly located also in the digestive tract and usually non-specific including dilated ceca with yellowish frothy contents, fluid distention and inflammation of intestines [38].

Adenoviruses are described in many species of vertebrate animals, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish [40][41][42]. Three TAdV species, namely TAdV-B (type TAdV-1), TAdV-C (type TAdV-4) and TAdV-D (type TAdV-5) can infect turkeys [43][44][45], isolated from respiratory disease and PEMS. These viruses also cause inclusion body hepatitis in turkey poults and may be responsible for lower hatchability rates in breeder flocks [46][47]. Generally, further studies are required to understand the pathogenicity of aviadenoviruses in turkeys, hence all aviadenoviruses were identified within diseased turkey flocks in Germany, however, no apparent link between case history and type of isolate were identified [44].

Surprisingly, the HE virus does not replicate in intestinal epithelium; however, it replicates in the endothelial cells that causes vascular damage and ischemic necrosis of intestinal villi. The main signs include depression, bloody droppings and sudden death [48]. Microscopic examination revealed characteristic lesions including hyperplasia of white pulp and lymphoid necrosis in the spleen at death [48]. Moreover, severely congested mucosa, degeneration and sloughing of the villus epithelium and hemorrhage at the villus tips were reported.

Rotaviruses are non-enveloped icosahedral particles and contain double stranded-RNA of 11 segments, which encode structural (VP1 to VP4, VP6 and VP7) and non-structural proteins (NSP1 to NSP6). , however, rotaviruses that are antigenically distinct (referred as rotavirus-like particles) from group A turkey rotaviruses were also detected in turkey poults [49]. The pathogenicity of rotaviruses in turkeys depends on several factors including the virulence of involved strains, coinfections with other pathogens and management [50]. The main clinical signs of rotaviruses infections are diarrhea, depression, high mortality rates, chronic runting and stunting.

Avian reoviruses have been associated with enteric disease, arthritis/tenosynovitis, respiratory distress, immunosuppression, poor feed conversion and malabsorption syndrome in poultry [51]. Fusogenic reovirus strains are characterized by the ability to fuse with infected cells and form multinucleated syncytia, affecting mammals, birds and reptiles, while non-fusogenic viruses are mainly infecting mammals [52]. Based on the molecular differences between avian reoviruses, species-specific reovirus types are being described, namely turkey reovirus for turkey, duck reovirus for duck, goose reovirus for goose and avian reovirus chickens [53]. Generally, young birds without maternal antibodies can be infected with reoviruses [54].

Turkey reoviruses are associated with arthritis and PEMS in turkeys [55]. Additionally, although reoviruses have been isolated from turkey poults suffering from enteritis disease, they have been isolated from apparently healthy birds [56]. It is suggested that turkey reoviruses cause severe bursa atrophy in poults at a young age that probably lead to a permanent immunosuppression [5], which in turns cause enteric disease by stimulating the opportunistic microorganisms. Sharafaldin et al. investigated the pathogenesis of turkey reoviruses.

3. Diagnosis of Viruses Implicated in Turkey Poult Enteritis

The diagnosis of PEMS based on the clinical picture and gross lesions is difficult because there are no specific clinical signs or pathognomonic lesions. Generally, cultivation of some enteric viruses is also a challenge. Therefore, negative contrast electron microscopy (EM), PCR and serology can help in the diagnosis of viruses causing enteric complex in turkeys. While the strengths of the TEM lie in the detection of the entire spectrum of virus groups, the PCR can be used for a more sensitive and differentiated diagnosis after narrowing down the spectrum to certain viruses.

Although the visual representation of viruses using EM requires special knowledge regarding sample preparation and evaluation, this method enables the detection of the entire spectrum of viruses in just one preparation approach with reasonable effort. EM can be particularly successful in virus infections with a high presence of pathogens, for example during an acute infection phase [57]. In addition, with samples with a lower virus concentration, significant virus enrichment can be achieved by means of ultracentrifugation [58]. In addition to the identification of known viruses that can be recognized in the context of mono or mixed infections, it is also possible to discover new and previously unknown viruses [59][60].

Molecular-based methods are used also in the diagnosis of enteric viruses of turkeys [15][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Sellers and his colleagues developed a multiplex RT-PCR for simultaneous detection of enteric viruses in turkeys. The sensitivity and specificity of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) was tested and evaluated. The mPCR is advantageous when compared with conventional detection methods because it allows detecting and distinguishing multiple pathogenic agents through the use of one test.

The diagnosis of TCoV depends on EM, PCR and serology. EM was used for identification of TCoV in turkey poults suffering from PEMS. TCoV was detected in turkey poults located in Germany using EM. When identifying TCoV particles, it must be considered that fragments of cell membranes often look very similar to these virus particles (Figure 1).

Animals 11 02063 g001 550
Figure 1. Corona-like particles (100–150 nm) in fecal samples of turkeys. Negative staining with phosphotungstic acid revealed that TCoVs are enveloped particles, roughly spherical, with diameters ranging from 100 to 200 nm (scale bar: 50 nm).

This often makes it difficult to clearly assess electron microscopic specimens. The 3’UTR sequence fragments showed high homologies between the TCoVs strains and IBV [69]. The high sensitivity of this diagnostic method makes it possible to detect even very small amounts of virus particles. These results highlighting that feces and intestinal samples are the best samples suited for PCR detection of TCoV [20].

The ELISA and immunofluorescent assay (IFA) can be used for the detection of antibodies in sera collected from birds at 10–15 days after the onset of clinical signs to help in the diagnosis of PEMS. Commercially available ELISA plates that are coated with IBV antigens could be successfully used for the detection of antibodies to TCoV in antibody-capture Abdelwahab and others developed a recombinant ELISA based on the N protein of TCoV expressed in a prokaryotic system for the detection of antibody of TCoV. The relative sensitivity and specificity of the recombinant ELISA compared with IFA were 86% and 96%, respectively

In contrast, TCoV could not be detected in turkey stocks suffering from PEMS [33][34], highlighting the fact that PEMS is a multifactorial syndrome and other potential causative agents should also be investigated.

In some cases, it is difficult to distinguish between astrovirus particles and other enteral viruses such as picorna and enteroviruses, so that such particles are often referred to as small round viruses (SRV) [39]. The RT-PCR can be used also for the diagnosis of TAstV using primers specific to the polymerase or capsid genes [70][62][71]. Mixed infections with TAstV and TCoV have been reported in turkeys causing a severe negative impact on intestinal absorptive functions as causative factors of PEMS [36]. Additionally, coinfection of turkeys with TAstV and rotavirus was also reported in the US [44].

The diagnosis of adenoviruses depends on virus isolation and molecular identification. Virus isolation can be done using cell cultures derived from the homologous species [64]. However, adenoviruses could be successfully derived from turkeys using chicken embryo liver (CEL) cells isolated from SPF chickens. The main cytopathic effects on CEL cells are rounded cell degeneration after the 1st and 4th passages [44].

Due to the high sensitivity of PCR in determining the genotype of rotaviruses, it is a good alternative to EM or virus In human medicine, PCR methods are established that amplify sections of gene 4 (VP4), gene 9 (VP7) or gene 9 (NSP4) [71][72][73]. To detect avian rotaviruses using PCR, highly conserved primers of the NSP4 gene can be used [34][52]. The NSP4 gene sequences of the rotaviruses detected by these authors were 96.1%–97.5% identical.

4. Prevention and Control of Enteritis in Turkeys

PEMS is an interaction between enteric pathogens and opportunistic infections in young turkeys. The main role of enteric viruses as primary agents in this syndrome is not fully understood. However, it is obvious that the interaction between enteric viruses and opportunistic bacteria/parasites and management increased the pathological effects. The development of PEMS depends on the virus–host interaction, virus pathotype, age of birds, immune status, biosecurity, and healthy conditions of the GIT.

There is an increasing trend to use alternatives to antibiotics including probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids, essential oils and botanical extracts for turkey [74] in the aim of reducing the pathogenic load. Several studies highlighted the benefits of these products in the improvement of animal performance and reduction infections in turkeys [75][76][77][78][79][80]. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) proved to be an efficient antibiotic alternative to controlSalmonellain turkeys by the reduction of intestinal colonization Higgins and others found also that supplementation of turkey poults with LAB following antibiotic treatment improved significantly animal performance, compared with non-treated or probiotic-treated poults [81].

Several medical plants such as rosemary, sage, thyme and oregano exhibited a broad-spectrum of antimicrobial properties and antioxidative effects [82][83] and improved animal performance in turkeys [84]. It was found that benzoic acid and essential oils improved performance, increased lactic acid bacteria populations and decreased coliform bacteria in the caeca of turkey poults [85]. Additionally, thymol and essential oils improved the antioxidant status of turkeys. Similar results were described in broiler chickens in which essential oils improved the intestinal microbial balance through reduction of coliform bacteria and increasing theLactobacillusspp.

Generally, protozoan and immunosuppressive diseases such as Marek’s disease in turkeys should be taken in to consideration [86]. The β-glucans have an immunomodulatory effect due to increasing the activity of immune cells such as macrophages and neutrophils [87][88][89]. Due to the negative impacts of protozoan such asHistomonas meleagridisin turkeys on the health and welfare, preventative management measures should be strictly applied to prevent the infection [2]. Additionally, litter management requires also thoughtful consideration and active management [90].

Although there is no specific treatment, the prevention of PEMS includes vaccination against potential pathogens in the case of available vaccines and hygienic measures. Until now, there are no available vaccines against viruses causing PEMS. Although several efforts were done to develop effective vaccine against TCoV using classical methods (attenuated and inactivated vaccines) and molecular based (DNA and vector) vaccines, early and protective humoral and cellular immune responses could not be obtained by the developed vaccines [23]. Further improvements and optimization of vaccination regimes against TCoV are urgently needed.

References

  1. Hafez, H.M.; Shehata, A.A. Turkey production and health: Current challenges. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 1, 3–14.
  2. Abd El-Wahab, A.; Visscher, C.; Haider, W.; Dimitri, R. A case study of histomoniasis in fattening turkeys identified in histopathological investigations. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 3, 13–18.
  3. Hafez, H.M. Overview about currently ongoing viral diseases of turkeys. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Turkey Diseases, Berlin, Germany, 19–21 June 2008; Verlag der DVG Service GmbH: Gießen, Germany, 2008. ISBN 978-3-939902-96-6.
  4. Barnes, H.J.; Guy, J.S.; Vaillancourt, J.P. Poult enteritis complex. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2000, 19, 565–588.
  5. Spackman, E.; Kapczynski, D.; Sellers, H. Multiplex real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction for the detection of three viruses associated with poult enteritis complex: Turkey astrovirus, turkey coronavirus, and turkey reovirus. Avian Dis. 2005, 49, 86–91.
  6. Jindal, N.; Patnayak, D.P.; Ziegler, A.F.; Lago, A.; Goyal, S.M. A retrospective study on poult enteritis syndrome in minnesota. Avian Dis. 2009, 53, 268–275.
  7. Mor, S.K.; Sharafeldin, T.A.; Abin, M.; Kromm, M.; Porter, R.E.; Goyal, S.M.; Patnayak, D.P. The occurrence of enteric viruses in light turkey syndrome. Avian Pathol. 2013, 42, 497–501.
  8. Day, J.M.; Ballard, L.L.; Duke, M.V.; Scheffler, B.E.; Zsak, L. Metagenomic analysis of the turkey gut RNA virus community. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 313.
  9. Guy, J.S.; Smith, L.G.; Breslin, J.J.; Vaillancourt, J.P.; Barnes, H.J. High mortality and growth depression experimentally produced in young turkeys by dual infection with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and turkey coronavirus. Avian Dis. 2000, 44, 105–113.
  10. Guy, J.S.; Barnes, H.J. Partial characterization of a turkey enterovirus-like virus. Avian Dis. 1991, 35, 197–200.
  11. Pakpinyo, S.; Ley, D.H.; Barnes, H.J.; Vaillancourt, J.P.; Guy, J.S. Prevalence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in naturally occurring cases of poult enteritis-mortality syndrome. Avian Dis. 2002, 46, 360–369.
  12. Woolcock, P.; Shivaprasad, H. Electron microscopic identification of viruses associated with poult enteritis in turkeys grown in california 1993–2003. Avian Dis. 2008, 52, 209–213.
  13. Yu, M.; Ismail, M.M.; Qureshi, M.A.; Dearth, R.N.; Barnes, H.J.; Saif, Y.M. Viral agents associated with poult enteritis and mortality syndrome: The role of a small round virus and a turkey coronavirus. Avian Dis. 2000, 44, 297–304.
  14. Spackman, E.; Day, J.M.; Pantin-Jackwood, M.J. Astrovirus, reovirus, and rotavirus concomitant infection causes decreased weight gain in broad-breasted white poults. Avian Dis. 2010, 54, 16–21.
  15. Zsak, L.; Strother, K.O.; Kisary, J. Partial genome sequence analysis of parvoviruses associated with enteric disease in poultry. Avian Pathol. 2008, 37, 435–441.
  16. Domańska-Blicharz, K.; Bocian, Ł.; Lisowska, A.; Jacukowicz, A.; Pikuła, A.; Minta, Z. Cross-sectional survey of selected enteric viruses in polish turkey flocks between 2008 and 2011. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 108.
  17. Circella, E.; Camarda, A.; Martella, V.; Bruni, G.; Lavazza, A.; Buonavoglia, C. Coronavirus associated with an enteric syndrome on a quail farm. Avian Pathol. 2007, 36, 251–258.
  18. Culver, F.; Dziva, F.; Cavanagh, D.; Stevens, M.P. Poult enteritis and mortality syndrome in turkeys in great britain. Vet. Rec. 2006, 159, 209–210.
  19. Maurel, S.; Toquin, D.; Briand, F.X.; Quéguiner, M.; Allée, C.; Bertin, J.; Ravillion, L.; Retaux, C.; Turblin, V.; Morvan, H.; et al. First full-length sequences of the s gene of european isolates reveal further diversity among turkey coronaviruses. Avian Pathol. 2011, 40, 179–189.
  20. Teixeira, M.C.B.; Luvizotto, M.C.R.; Ferrari, H.F.; Mendes, A.R.; da Silva, S.E.L.; Cardoso, T.C. Detection of turkey coronavirus in commercial turkey poults in brazil. Avian Pathol. 2007, 36, 29–33.
  21. Villarreal, L.Y.B.; Assayag, M.S.; Brandão, P.E.; Chacón, J.L.V.; Bunger, A.N.D.; Astolfi-Ferreira, C.S.; Gomes, C.R.; Jones, R.C.; Ferreira, A.J.P. Identification of turkey astrovirus and turkey coronavirus in an outbreak of poult enteritis and mortality syndrome. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 8, 131–135.
  22. Wooming, B. A coronavirus outbreak in northwest arkansas. In Proceedings of the Annual meeting of American Association of Avian Pathologist, Chicago, IL, USA, 20–23 July 2013.
  23. Houta, M.H.; Awe, O.O.; Ali, A. Infection with the turkey coronavirus: A recurring problem in turkeys. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 3, 19–27.
  24. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) Master Species List 2019 V1. Available online: https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy (accessed on 15 June 2021).
  25. de Wit, J.J.; Cook, J.K.A. Spotlight on avian coronaviruses. Avian Pathol. 2020, 49, 313–316.
  26. Gomaa, M.H.; Barta, J.R.; Ojkic, D.; Yoo, D. Complete genomic sequence of turkey coronavirus. Virus Res. 2008, 135, 237–246.
  27. Miłek, J.; Blicharz-Domańska, K. Coronaviruses in avian species—review with focus on epidemiology and diagnosis in wild birds. J. Vet. Res. 2018, 62, 249–255.
  28. Chen, Y.-N.; Loa, C.C.; Ababneh, M.M.-K.; Wu, C.C.; Lin, T.L. Genotyping of turkey coronavirus field isolates from various geographic locations in the unites states based on the spike gene. Arch. Virol. 2015, 160, 2719–2726.
  29. Domanska-Blicharz, K.; Sajewicz-Krukowska, J. Recombinant turkey coronavirus: Are some s gene structures of gammacoronaviruses especially prone to exchange? Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101018.
  30. Guy, J.S. Turkey coronavirus. In Diseases of Poultry; Saif, Y.M., Barnes, H.J., Glisson, J.R., Fadly, A.M., McDougald, L.R., Swayne, D.E., Eds.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 2003; pp. 300–307.
  31. Brown, P.A.; Courtillon, C.; Weerts, E.A.W.S.; Andraud, M.; Allée, C.; Vendembeuche, A.; Amelot, M.; Rose, N.; Verheije, M.H.; Eterradossi, N. Transmission kinetics and histopathology induced by European turkey coronavirus during experimental infection of specific pathogen free turkeys. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 234–242.
  32. Guy, J. Turkey Coronavirus Enteritis, 4th ed.; Swayne, D.E., Boulianne, M., McDougald, L.R., Nair, V., Suarez, D.L., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 402–408.
  33. Jindal, N.; Patnayak, D.P.; Chander, Y.; Ziegler, A.F.; Goyal, S.M. Detection and molecular characterization of enteric viruses from poult enteritis syndrome in turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 217–226.
  34. Pantin-Jackwood, M.J.; Spackman, E.; Day, J.M.; Rives, D. Periodic monitoring of commercial turkeys for enteric viruses indicates continuous presence of astrovirus and rotavirus on the farms. Avian Dis. 2007, 51, 674–680.
  35. Lagan Tregaskis, P.; Devaney, R.; Smyth, V.J. The first whole genome sequence and characterisation of avian nephritis virus genotype 3. Viruses 2021, 13, 235.
  36. Ismail, M.M.; Tang, A.Y.; Saif, Y.M. Pathogenicity of turkey coronavirus in turkeys and chickens. Avian Dis. 2003, 47, 515–522.
  37. Thouvenelle, M.L.; Haynes, J.S.; Sell, J.L.; Reynolds, D.L. Astrovirus infection in hatchling turkeys: Alterations in intestinal maltase activity. Avian Dis. 1995, 39, 343–348.
  38. Pantin-Jackwood, M.J.; Day, J.M.; Jackwood, M.W.; Spackman, E. Enteric viruses detected by molecular methods in commercial chicken and turkey flocks in the united states between 2005 and 2006. Avian Dis. 2008, 52, 235–244.
  39. Koci, M.D.; Moser, L.A.; Kelley, L.A.; Larsen, D.; Brown, C.C.; Schultz-Cherry, S. Astrovirus induces diarrhea in the absence of inflammation and cell death. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 11798–11808.
  40. Doszpoly, A.; Harrach, B.; LaPatra, S.; Benkő, M. Unconventional gene arrangement and content revealed by full genome analysis of the white sturgeon adenovirus, the single member of the genus Ichtadenovirus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 75, 103976.
  41. Jejesky de Oliveira, A.P.; Valdetaro Rangel, M.C.; Z. Vidovszky, M.; Rossi, J.L., Jr.; Vicentini, F.; Harrach, B.; L. Kaján, G. Identification of two novel adenoviruses in smooth-billed ani and tropical screech Owl. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229415.
  42. Wellehan, J.F.X.; Johnson, A.J.; Harrach, B.; Benkö, M.; Pessier, A.P.; Johnson, C.M.; Garner, M.M.; Childress, A.; Jacobson, E.R. Detection and analysis of six lizard adenoviruses by consensus primer PCR provides further evidence of a reptilian origin for the atadenoviruses. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 13366–13369.
  43. Kaján, G.L.; Stefancsik, R.; Ursu, K.; Palya, V.; Benko, M. The first complete genome sequence of a non-chicken aviadenovirus, proposed to be turkey adenovirus 1. Virus Res. 2010, 153, 226–233.
  44. Kleine, A.; Hafez, H.M.; Lüschow, D. Investigations on aviadenoviruses isolated from turkey flocks in Germany. Avian Pathol. 2017, 46, 181–187.
  45. Marek, A.; Ballmann, M.Z.; Kosiol, C.; Harrach, B.; Schlötterer, C.; Hess, M. Whole-genome sequences of two turkey adenovirus types reveal the existence of two unknown lineages that merit the establishment of novel species within the genus Aviadenovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 156–170.
  46. Guy, J.S.; Schaeffer, J.L.; Barnes, H.J. Inclusion-body hepatitis in day-old turkeys. Avian Dis. 1988, 32, 587–590.
  47. Shivaprasad, H.L.; Woolcock, P.R.; McFarland, M.D. Group I avian adenovirus and avian adeno-Associated virus in turkey poults with inclusion body hepatitis. Avian Pathol. 2001, 30, 661–666.
  48. Fitzgerald, S.D.; Piersonn, F.W. Hemorrhagic enteritis and related infections. In Disease of Poultry, 12th ed.; Fadly, A.M., Glisson, J.R., Mcdougald, L.R., Nolan, L.K., Swayne, D.E., Saif, Y.M., Eds.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 2013.
  49. Theil, K.W.; Reynolds, D.L.; Saif, Y.M. Comparison of immune electron microscopy and genome electropherotyping techniques for detection of turkey rotaviruses and rotaviruslike viruses in intestinal contents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1986, 23, 695–699.
  50. McNulty, M.S.; Curran, W.L.; Todd, D.; McFerran, J.B. Detection of viruses in avian faeces by direct electron microscopy. Avian Pathol. 1979, 8, 239–247.
  51. Barrera, M.; Kumar, P.; Porter, R.E.; Goyal, S.M.; Mor, S.K. Retrospective analysis of turkey arthritis reovirus diagnostic submissions in minnesota. Avian Dis. 2019, 63, 681.
  52. Day, J.M.; Spackman, E.; Pantin-Jackwood, M. A multiplex RT-PCR test for the differential identification of turkey astrovirus type 1, turkey astrovirus type 2, chicken astrovirus, avian nephritis virus, and avian rotavirus. Avian Dis. 2007, 51, 681–684.
  53. Jones, R.C.; Islam, M.R.; Kelly, D.F. Early pathogenesis of experimental reovirus infection in chickens. Avian Pathol. 1989, 18, 239–253.
  54. van der Heide, L. The history of avian reovirus. Avian Dis. 2000, 44, 638–641.
  55. Mor, S.K.; Kumar, R.; Sobhy, N.M.; Singh, A.; Kakrudi, N.; Marusak, R.A.; Goyal, S.M.; Porter, R.E. Enteric viruses associated with mid-growth turkey enteritis. Avian Dis. 2020, 64, 471–477.
  56. Wooley, R.E.; Dees, T.A.; Cromack, A.S.; Gratzek, J.B. Infectious enteritis of turkeys: Characterization of two reoviruses isolated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation from turkeys with infectious enteritis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1972, 33, 157–164.
  57. Palmer, E.L.; Martin, M.L. Electron Microscopy in Viral Diagnosis; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1988.
  58. Laue, M.; Bannert, N. Detection limit of negative staining electron microscopy for the diagnosis of bioterrorism-related micro-organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 1159–1168.
  59. Guy, J.S. Virus infections of the gastrointestinal tract of poultry. Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 1166–1175.
  60. Tang, Y.; Ismail, M.M.; Saif, Y.M. Development of antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for detection of turkey astroviruses. Avian Dis. 2005, 49, 182–188.
  61. Breslin, J.J.; Smith, L.G.; Fuller, F.J.; Guy, J.S. Sequence analysis of the turkey coronavirus nucleocapsid protein gene and 3′ untranslated region identifies the virus as a close relative of infectious bronchitis virus. Virus Res. 1999, 65, 187–193.
  62. Koci, M.D.; Seal, B.S.; Schultz-Cherry, S. Development of an RT-PCR diagnostic test for an avian astrovirus. J. Virol. Methods 2000, 90, 79–83.
  63. Moura-Alvarez, J.; Chacon, J.V.; Scanavini, L.S.; Nuñez, L.F.N.; Astolfi-Ferreira, C.S.; Jones, R.C.; Piantino Ferreira, A.J. Enteric viruses in Brazilian turkey flocks: Single and multiple virus infection frequency according to age and clinical signs of intestinal disease. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 945–955.
  64. Hess, M.; Raue, R.; Hafez, H.M. PCR for specific detection of haemorrhagic enteritis virus of turkeys, an avian adenovirus. J. Virol. Methods 1999, 81, 199–203.
  65. Liu, H.J.; Giambrone, J.J.; Nielsen, B.L. Molecular characterization of avian reoviruses using nested PCR and nucleotide sequence analysis. J. Virol. Methods 1997, 65, 159–167.
  66. Xie, Z.; Fadl, A.A.; Girshick, T.; Khan, M.I. Detection of avian adenovirus by polymerase chain reaction. Avian Dis. 1999, 43, 98.
  67. Bunger, A.N.D.; Chacón, J.L.; Jones, R.C.; Ferreira, A.J.P. Detection and molecular characterization of gene 3 and 5 of turkey coronavirus from turkeys with severe enteritis in Brazil. Avian Dis. 2009, 53, 356–362.
  68. Nuñez, L.F.N.; Ferreira, A.J.P. Viral agents related to enteric disease in commercial chicken flocks, with special reference to latin america. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2013, 69, 853–864.
  69. Cavanagh, D.; Mawditt, K.; Sharma, M.; Drury, S.E.; Ainsworth, H.L.; Britton, P.; Gough, R.E. Detection of a coronavirus from turkey poults in europe genetically related to infectious bronchitis virus of chickens. Avian Pathol. 2001, 30, 355–368.
  70. Reynolds, D.L.; Saif, Y.M. Astrovirus: A cause of an enteric disease in turkey poults. Avian Dis. 1986, 30, 728–735.
  71. Iturriza-Gómara, M.; Green, J.; Brown, D.W.; Desselberger, U.; Gray, J.J. Diversity within the VP4 gene of rotavirus p[8] strains: Implications for reverse transcription-pcr genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 898–901.
  72. Gouvea, V.; Glass, R.I.; Woods, P.; Taniguchi, K.; Clark, H.F.; Forrester, B.; Fang, Z.Y. Polymerase chain reaction amplification and typing of rotavirus nucleic acid from stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 276–282.
  73. Rodríguez-Díaz, J.; Rubilar-Abreu, E.; Spitzner, M.; Hedlund, K.-O.; Liprandi, F.; Svensson, L. Design of a multiplex nested PCR for genotyping of the nsp4 from group a rotavirus. J. Virol. Methods 2008, 149, 240–245.
  74. Gernat, A.A.; Santos, F.B.O.; Grimes, J.L. Alternative antimicrobials in the turkey industry—Challenges and perspectives. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 3. in press.
  75. Batkowska, J.; Brodacki, A.; Tomczyk, G. The influence of probiotic bacteria (Bacillus Toyoi) on livability and performance of young meat-type turkeys. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2015, 17, 433–438.
  76. Grimes, J.L.; Rahimi, S.; Oviedo, E.; Sheldon, B.W.; Santos, F.B.O. Effects of a direct-fed microbial (Primalac) on turkey poult performance and susceptibility to oral Salmonella challenge. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 1464–1470.
  77. Mohammadigheisar, M.; Shirley, R.B.; Barton, J.; Welsher, A.; Thiery, P.; Kiarie, E. Growth performance and gastrointestinal responses in heavy tom turkeys fed antibiotic free corn−soybean meal diets supplemented with multiple doses of a single strain Bacillus subtilis probiotic (DSM29784). Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5541–5550.
  78. Russell, S.M.; Grimes, J.L. The Effect of a direct-fed microbial (primalac) on turkey live performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2009, 18, 185–192.
  79. Torres-Rodriguez, A.; Donoghue, A.M.; Donoghue, D.J.; Barton, J.T.; Tellez, G.; Hargis, B.M. Performance and condemnation rate analysis of commercial turkey flocks treated with a Lactobacillus spp.-based probiotic. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 444–446.
  80. Tellez-Isaias, V.; Christine, N.V.; Brittany, D.G.; Callie, M.S.; Lucas, E.G.; Roberto, S.; Thaina, L.B.; Lesleigh, C.B.; Makenly, E.C.; Aaron, J.F.; et al. Developing probiotics, prebiotics, and organic acids to control Salmonella spp. in commercial turkeys at the University of Arkansas USA. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 3, 7–12.
  81. Higgins, S.E.; Torres-Rodriguez, A.; Vicente, J.L.; Sartor, C.D.; Pixley, C.M.; Nava, G.M.; Tellez, G.; Barton, J.T.; Hargis, B.M. Evaluation of intervention strategies for idiopathic diarrhea in commercial turkey brooding houses. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2005, 14, 345–348.
  82. do Diniz Nascimento, L.; de Moraes, A.A.B.; da Costa, K.S.; Pereira Galúcio, J.M.; Taube, P.S.; Costa, C.M.L.; Neves Cruz, J.; de Aguiar Andrade, E.H.; de Faria, L.J.G. Bioactive natural compounds and antioxidant activity of essential oils from spice plants: New findings and potential applications. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 988.
  83. Nieto, G. A review on applications and uses of thymus in the food industry. Plants 2020, 9, 961.
  84. Bampidis, V.A.; Christodoulou, V.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Chatzopoulou, P.S.; Tsiligianni, T.; Spais, A.B. Effect of dietary dried oregano leaves on growth performance, carcase characteristics and serum cholesterol of female early maturing turkeys. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 595–601.
  85. Giannenas, I.; Papaneophytou, C.P.; Tsalie, E.; Pappas, I.; Triantafillou, E.; Tontis, D.; Kontopidis, G.A. Dietary supplementation of benzoic acid and essential oil compounds affects buffering capacit y of the feeds, performance of turkey poults and their antioxidant status, ph in the digestive tract, intestinal microbiota and morphology. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 225–236.
  86. Shehata, A.A.; Lüschow, D.; Hafez, H.M. History and current status of Marek’s disease in turkeys. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 3, 1–6.
  87. Reynolds, J.A.; Kastello, M.D.; Harrington, D.G.; Crabbs, C.L.; Peters, C.J.; Jemski, J.V.; Scott, G.H.; Di Luzio, N.R. Glucan-induced enhancement of host resistance to selected infectious diseases. Infect. Immun. 1980, 30, 51–57.
  88. Cleary, J.A.; Kelly, G.E.; Husband, A.J. The effect of molecular weight and β-1,6-linkages on priming of macrophage function in mice by (1,3)-β-d-Glucan. Immunol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 77, 395–403.
  89. Tzianabos, A.O. Polysaccharide immunomodulators as therapeutic agents: Structural aspects and biologic function. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 523–533.
  90. Grimes, J.L.; Sharara, M.; Kolar, P. Considerations in selecting turkey bedding materials. Ger. J. Vet. Res. 2021, 3, 28–39.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Awad Shehata
View Times: 712
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 02 Aug 2021
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback