Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 3192 word(s) 3192 2021-07-02 11:22:41 |
2 update references and layout Meta information modification 3192 2021-07-23 10:33:58 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Fernández-González, D.; Gómez Rodríguez, C. Recovery Copper Using CSP. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 14 June 2024).
Fernández-González D, Gómez Rodríguez C. Recovery Copper Using CSP. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 14, 2024.
Fernández-González, Daniel, Cristian Gómez Rodríguez. "Recovery Copper Using CSP" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 14, 2024).
Fernández-González, D., & Gómez Rodríguez, C. (2021, July 23). Recovery Copper Using CSP. In Encyclopedia.
Fernández-González, Daniel and Cristian Gómez Rodríguez. "Recovery Copper Using CSP." Encyclopedia. Web. 23 July, 2021.
Recovery Copper Using CSP

On the one hand, copper slag is nowadays a waste in copper pyrometallurgy despite the significant quantities of iron (>40 wt. %) and copper (1 to 2 wt. %). On the other hand, solar energy, when properly concentrated, offers great potential in high-temperature processes. Therefore, concentrated solar power (CSP) could be used in the treatment of copper slag to transform fayalite into magnetite and copper sulfides and oxides into copper nodules. This is the objective of this paper. The results show that fayalite was partially decomposed into magnetite and silica. Moreover, copper nodules (65–85 wt. % Cu) were identified in the treated samples, while the initial slag, analyzed by X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and SEM-EDX, did not show the presence of metallic copper. Finally, the treated copper slag was crushed and grinded down to 40 μm, and two fractions were obtained by magnetic separation. The magnetic fraction (85%) was mainly comprised of magnetite, while the non-magnetic fraction (15%) had 5–10 wt. % Cu. Considering the experimental results, 7.5–18 kg Cu/t slag might be recovered from the slag. A preliminary economic analysis, considering the current copper price, indicates that only the recovery of copper could represent a significant economic benefit (>30 €/t slag). Therefore, CSP might be a potential candidate for the treatment of copper slag to recover copper and iron.

concentrated solar power (CSP) copper slag copper environment sustainable metallurgy solar energy

1. Introduction

Copper is one of the most mined metals on the Earth due to the applications of this metal in different fields. However, a lot of tailing material, currently unprocessed, is generated in the process, and provides a huge opportunity to use concentrated solar power (CSP).
The pyrometallurgical technique is the most important to produce copper, and the smelting conversion process is the most widely used within this route [1]. Thus, 80% of the copper is currently produced by the concentration, smelting, and refining of sulfide ores [2], which include chalcopyrite (CuFeS2), bornite (Cu5FeS4), and chalcocite (Cu2S). Different products are generated in the fusion conversion process (Figure 1). These include matte, which is heavy and contains most of the copper as sulfide (it is later treated in the converter to obtain blister copper, and finally metallic copper is produced after fire refining and electrowinning) and slag, which contains most of the iron as fayalite.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the smelting conversion process of copper.
Two slags are produced in the smelting conversion process: first, in the smelting furnace, and second in the converter. However, these slags contain (apart from fayalite and magnetite, which are the main phases) significant quantities of copper (sulfide (matte) dragged or trapped by the slag, or oxide associated with other oxides of the slag [1][3]). The slags are reprocessed in the smelting furnace or in the slag cleaning furnace (electric furnaces, where carbon and pyrite are used as additives) to recover some of the copper. Finally, the final slag is disposed of in a controlled landfill when the copper concentration is approximately in the range 1 to 2 wt. % Cu.
Copper slags might be considered a residue/by-product with great potential due to both the copper (1–2 wt. % Cu) and iron (>40 wt. % [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]) contents as a secondary resource for metal recovery [11]. A total of 20 Mt of primary copper are produced worldwide, and this involves 45 Mt of slag generated in the process (2.2–3 tons of slag/ton copper [2][12][13]), which would represent >20 Mt Fe and 0.5–1 Mt Cu yearly sent to controlled landfills. Therefore, copper slag represents an environmental impact [4]: risks of heavy metals lixiviation, a visual impact, and sometimes occupation of cultivable areas. Researchers have tried to find a use for copper slags, but a massive industrial utilization has still not been found [14]. Copper slags have been used as abrasives (polishing and cleaning) for metallic structures [15][16] and mainly in the building industry: concrete manufactured with copper slag [5]; copper slags as fine particles in concrete manufacturing [13]; copper slag as a replacement for the sand in cements [9]; copper slag as a filler in glass–epoxy composites [17]; and copper slag as a construction material in bituminous pavements [18]. Research has also focused on the recovery of iron from the slag: by using coke as reductant of the copper oxide and the magnetite [19]; by modifying the molten slag with the purpose of promoting the mineralization of recoverable mineral phases and inducing the growth of the mineral phases [20]; by using a method based on coal, Direct Reduction Iron (DRI), and magnetic separation [21]; by means of a process based on aluminothermic reduction [22]; by reduction in an electric furnace with the objective of obtaining a Cu-Pb-Fe alloy [23]; by carbothermic reduction to transform the copper slag into pig iron and glassy material [24]; by irradiation with a microwave as a support of the carbothermal method [25]; or by reduction with coke powders and magnetic separation [26].
Solar energy has been widely used in materials science and metallurgy [27]. The main types of research in the field of metallurgy carried out with concentrated solar power (CSP) are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Main types of research in the field of metallurgy and mineral processing using CSP (abbreviations: OSF, Odeillo Solar Furnace; PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute; WIS, Weizmann Institute of Science; UKR, Institute for Problems of Materials Science of NAS of Ukraine; PSA, Plataforma Solar de Almería).
able 1. Main types of research in the field of metallurgy and mineral processing using CSP (abbreviations: OSF, Odeillo Solar Furnace; PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute; WIS, Weizmann Institute of Science; UKR, Institute for Problems of Materials Science of NAS of Ukraine; PSA, Plataforma Solar de Almería).
Material Process Temperature Installation Researcher
Si Dissociation of Si3N4 by carbothermal reduction of SiO2 under an N2 atmosphere >1400 °C OSF Jean P. Murray, Gilles Flamant, Carolyn J. Roos [28]
Si Carbothermic reduction of SiO2 under vacuum conditions at a high temperature 1725–2000 °C PSI Peter G. Loutzenhiser, Ozan Tuerk, Aldo Steinfeld [29]
Al Production of aluminum via carbothermal reduction >2000 °C PSI and OSF Jean P. Murray [30][31][32]
Al Production of aluminum using both electricity and heat generated using solar energy ≃1000 °C UKR Y. M. Lytvynenko [33]
Zn Production of zinc via CSP to be used in water and carbon dioxide splitting (scaled up to demonstration plant scale [34]) >1750 °C Mainly at the PSI, OSF, and WIS E. A. Fletcher, R. D. Palumbo, T. Osinga, M. Epstein A. Steinfeld, C. Wieckert, L. Schunck, W. Villasmil, E. Koepft, and others [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]
Fe, Mn, Cd Treatment of different materials containing iron >1100 °C Mainly at the PSI, PSA, OSF, and WIS F. Sibieude, A. Steinfeld, E. A. Fletcher, I. Ruiz-Bustinza, J. Mochón and others [46][47][48][49]
Concentrated solar power (CSP) has also been used in materials processing and non-metallic materials. The use of CSP in these latter fields can be found in Fernández-González et al. [27]. The application of CSP in materials science and metallurgy has been widely investigated by our research group. The following fields can be mentioned: synthesis of calcium aluminates [50], iron metallurgy [46][51][52], the treatment of Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) slag [53], the production of silicomanganese [54], and transformations in the Ca-Si-O system [55].
The utilization of concentrated solar power (CSP) to treat copper slag is proposed in this paper. Since most of the copper is produced in mines located in the west of the American continent (from Arizona (United States) to Chile), where high values of solar radiation are measured, the use of CSP might have great potential to recover copper and iron from slags. Figure 2 shows a flow-sheet of the process to examine Cu tailings using CSP. The main results are schematically indicated. Therefore, the aims of the research are: to transform the fayalite into magnetite, as iron could be collected from the slag as magnetite using magnetic methods; and to transform copper oxide and copper matte (the occluded matte in the slag) into metallic copper and concentrate it.
Figure 2. Flow-sheet for the process to examine Cu tailings using CSP.

2. Macroscopic Analysis

Samples were subjected to visual observation. Some remarkable questions can be deduced from this analysis. The average dimensions of the volume affected by the beam of CSP were: 19 mm in diameter and 13 mm in depth. This layer of treated material (material that completely melted during the process) blocks the heating until melting of all the material available in the crucible. Therefore, the slag remains unreacted below the above-indicated layer. On another note, the sample was clearly magnetic after the treatment with CSP. The initial slag was not magnetic (fayalite was the main constituent of the initial slag, which is not magnetic), so the magnetite content increased during the process and became the main constituent of the final product.
On another note, elemental sulfur (greenish yellow) is identified in the face located in contact with the unaffected material. It is the product of the thermal decomposition of the occluded matte (copper sulfides). In this context, Winkel studied the thermal decomposition of copper sulfides under concentrated irradiation [56]. He observed that metallic copper, iron sulfide, and elemental sulfur can be obtained after the treatment of copper concentrates at a high temperature under an inert atmosphere. To a certain extent, copper slag always contains a certain amount of copper sulfides as occluded matte (a binary mixture of Cu2S and FeS). The elemental analysis of the slag used in our experiments indicates 0.52 wt. % S, which is combined with iron and copper. Moreover, our experiments were performed under an ambient atmosphere impoverished in oxygen promoted by the utilization of the glass chamber and the pump. Additionally, the layer of molten slag blocks the circulation of gases (oxygen) through the slag and there is both a high temperature and an inert atmosphere in part of the charge. Under these conditions, occluded matte can decompose and give copper, as in Winkel’s work [56]. This explains the presence of metallic copper in the final samples (apart from the decomposition of the copper oxides under reductant conditions). It is necessary to consider that this mechanism is very limited due to the small proportion of occluded matte (there was around 0.52 wt. % S in the initial sample).


Samples were also analyzed using a scanning electron microscope and point analysis. The objective of this analysis was to check for both the presence of copper and the increase in magnetite in the final samples that resulted from the treatment with solar energy. Copper nodules were identified using this technique (65–85 wt. % Cu). Magnetite was also identified, the same as fayalite. Four representative SEM-EDX analyses of the treated samples are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. (a) SEM-EDX sample identified as CusinBonus; (b) SEM-EDX sample identified as CuCon3; (c) SEM-EDX sample identified as CuCon1; (d) SEM-EDX sample identified as CuSin1.
A representative zone of the sample CusinBonus is observed in Figure 4a. Point 1 corresponds to a copper-rich nodule (79.12 wt. % Cu; 9.66 wt. % Fe; 5.02 wt. % O); point 2 shows magnetite; while point 3 and point 4 represent non-decomposed fayalite. It was observed that the presence of copper-rich nodules causes the impoverishment in copper of the surrounding areas.
A representative zone of the sample CuCon3 can be observed in Figure 4b. Point 1 corresponds to copper-rich nodules (79.03 wt. % Cu; 7.63 wt. % Fe; 5.72 wt. % O; 0.33 wt. % S) and point 2 indicates a ferrite of calcium and silicon. In the case of the sample CuCon1 (Figure 4c), it is possible to check that point 1 corresponds to the fayalite, point 2 represents the magnetite, while point 3 represents the copper-enriched nodule (80.51 wt. % Cu; 10.01 wt. % Fe; 3.71 wt. % O).
Sample CuSin1 (Figure 3d) was also analyzed using SEM-EDX. Point 1 represents copper nodules (82.45 wt. % Cu; 8.98 wt. % Fe; 2.91 wt. % O), point 2 represents magnetite, while point 3 represents non-decomposed fayalite.
The formation of magnetite is also significative in the experiments due to the decomposition of the fayalite (into magnetite and silica). Therefore, oxidizing conditions were also verified during the experiments because magnetite was clearly formed. Figure 4 shows a large region of the sample where magnetite was massively formed. Points 1, 2, 3, and 5 (40–50 wt. % Fe, 25–29 wt. % O) represent iron oxides. The well-developed tetrahedrons of magnetite in the region represented by point 3 can clearly be observed. Magnetite refers in this manuscript to a series of phases belonging to the iron spinel as magnesioferrite (MgFe2O4), magnetite (FeFe2O4, where one Fe is +2 and two Fe’s are +3, respectively), and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3, Fe (II)-deficient magnetite). Cuprospinel (CuFe2O4) would also belong to this series of iron spinel. Point 4 corresponds to the non-decomposed fayalite (22.72 wt. % Si, 36.52 wt. % O, 11.58 wt. % Si).
Figure 4. SEM-EDX sample identified as CuCon2.

4. Discussion

In the case presented in this paper, either the Cu2S or the Cu2O, in slightly reductant environments propitiated by the presence of Fe3O4 (magnetite) and FeO (wustite), cause the thermodynamically stable species for the copper to be the metallic copper and not the oxide or the sulfide [57].
In this way, it is feasible that, when treating a copper slag (which mainly comprises fayalite) that contains in the form of solid solution or as sulfides or oxides dispersed in a matrix of fayalite copper atoms in quantities of around 2 wt. %, the reduction of copper in an environment controlled by the oxidizing potential of the FeO–Fe3O4 system takes place (the same could be indicated with respect to the fact that the reductant for the fayalite would be the FeO). The high heating rate, but also the high cooling rate, that can be reached in solar furnaces propitiate that the phases obtained at high temperatures could be also observed at room temperature due to the kinetics, and, in this way, remarkably, changes are not produced (it possible to think about the Time–Transformation–Temperature curves) [58][59]. However, the short duration of the treatments impedes the development of the copper nodules.
The recovery of both iron and copper from copper slags has been studied using concentrated solar power (CSP), but in a preliminary manner. This research offers results about the utilization of CSP to transform fayalite into magnetite, and to decompose CuFe2O4 to recover copper from the slag (and additionally to transform occluded copper matte into copper). Once the feasibility of using solar energy in this field has been demonstrated, it will be time to think about the improvement of the experimental conditions for the purpose of maximizing the transformation of fayalite into magnetite, and the destruction of both the CuFe2O4 and the occluded matte. This way, it is reasonable to think about the design of the reactor, and even evaluating the possibility of scaling up the process to the industrial scale. The commercialization of the process will depend on how much copper can be recovered using this process, but also will depend on how much iron can be collected as magnetite. A problem could arise from the installation costs for this technology as they are in the range of other high-energy technologies, such as plasma or even lasers [60], and because it is still an immature technology (in the field of materials). In fact, concentrated solar power (CSP) has not been scaled up to the industrial level for materials science or metallurgical applications [27]. Apart from the technical limitations (such as the obtaining of high-quality mirrors at a reasonable price), the above-mentioned economical limitations should be considered. It is necessary to consider that nowadays copper slags are disposed of in a controlled landfill despite the copper and iron contents. If it was possible to recover both elements, the cost of obtaining both elements (transportation costs, installation costs, etc.) should be lower than the revenues produced by selling the copper and iron concentrates. Additionally, copper, as observed in the analysis, is not pure copper, and for that reason it should be treated after the process. Further studies should be performed to increase the purity of the copper (and to make the copper nodules grow up to a reasonable size for the subsequent metallurgical operations), but also to study the question of how to separate all phases in a proper way. Anyway, it is possible to concentrate 3–6.5 times the copper in the non-magnetic phase. If the commercial copper grade for copper oxides is considered (0.6 wt. %), the copper concentrate obtained using solar energy would be 3–6.5 times richer than the commercial one using a waste that is not necessary to mine. Another potential application of concentrated solar power (CSP), also in copper metallurgy, is in the furnaces used to treat slags before their disposal, where significant electrical energy is used to heat the furnaces, although the CSP-based process is still not competitive nowadays.
A preliminary study of the potential economic impact of the treatment of the slag with CSP was carried out. The slag, as was checked in the characterization, mainly comprises fayalite (>85%). For that reason, energy requirements were calculated considering only this phase. A total of 275 kWh/t slag is the latent heat, and 125 kWh/t slag is the enthalpy of fusion. It was assumed that the cost of the energy provided by the solar furnace, considering amortization, development, and operation, is 0.40 €/kWh. Thus, the cost of melting the fayalite slag in the solar furnace would be 160 €/t slag. It is possible to see that the levelized cost of energy of concentrated solar power plants fell by 47% between 2010 and 2019 (from 0.346 €/kWh to 0.182 €/kWh). The capital cost for concentrated solar power was 1.2–1.8 k€/kW (50–1000 kW) according to Flamant et al., 1999 [60]. On the other hand, the benefit that would be obtained from the recovery of 2.0% Cu in the slags at the current price of the slag (around 9000 €/t Cu in the London Metals Exchange Market) would be 190 €/t slag of fayalite treated with concentrated solar power. If it is considered that 50% of the magnetite could be recovered per ton of fayalite slag being processed, the benefit would be 300 €/t slag.
The presented results show that some of the fayalite was transformed into magnetite, and some of the initial copper oxides and sulfides were transformed into metallic copper. Considering the separation of the phases (magnetite, metallic copper, and clean slag), it would be possible to take advantage of the properties of the different phases: physical (metallic copper has a density close to 9 g/cm3, magnetite has a density of around 6 g/cm3, and the slag has a density of around 3–4 g/cm3), electrical (electrical properties of the copper can be considered to separate it from the slag), and magnetic (magnetite can be separated using magnetic methods). Grinding operations should be considered before the separation. If the size of the copper nodules is considered, the treated slag should be fine-grinded to less than 10 µm, although this size would require an energy-consuming process, so conditions to have larger copper nodules should be further studied.
The recycling and reutilization of materials has become an important subject for modern societies to comply with environmental regulations and, therefore, improve people’s quality of life, for instance in the case of plastics [61] or other metallurgical by-products. In addition, recycling and reutilization of materials increases the efficiency of the industrial processes and, thus, the economic profitability of the industrial sector. In this context, new uses are being given to industrial wastes [62][63][64][65] and new potential processes are being considered, such as solar energy [66]. In this manuscript, we proposed the utilization of concentrated solar power (CSP) in the treatment of copper slag to recover/concentrate copper and iron from these slags. The recovery of these valuable phases would reduce the volume of wastes generated in copper metallurgy and, therefore, the environmental impact of metals industries.


  1. Sancho, J.P.; Verdeja, L.F.; Ballester, A. Metalurgia Extractiva. Volumen II. Procesos de Obtención, 1st ed.; Síntesis: Madrid, Spain, 2000.
  2. Fan, Y.; Shibata, E.; Iizuka, A.; Nakamura, T. Crystallization behaviors of copper smelter slag studied using time-temperature-transformation diagram. Mater. Trans. 2014, 55, 958–963.
  3. Davenport, W.G.; King, M.; Schlesinger, M.; Biswas, A.K. Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, 4th ed.; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2002.
  4. Nazer, A.; Pavez, O.; Rojas, F.; Aguilar, C. Una revisión de los usos de las escorias de cobre. In Proceedings of the IBEROMET XI. X CONAMET/SAM, Viña del Mar, Chile, 2–5 November 2010.
  5. Coursol, P.; Cardona, N.; Mackey, P.; Bell, S.; Davis, B. Minimization of copper losses in copper smelting slag during electric furnace treatment. JOM 2012, 64, 1305–1313.
  6. Cardona, N.; Coursol, P.; Vargas, J.; Parra, R. Physical chemistry of copper smelting slags and copper losses at the Paipote smelter. Part 1-Thermodynamic modelling. Can. Metall. Quart. 2011, 50, 318–329.
  7. Cardona, N.; Coursol, P.; Vargas, J.; Parra, R. Physical chemistry of copper smelting slags and copper losses at the Paipote smelter. Part 2-Characterization of industrial slags. Can. Metall. Quart. 2011, 50, 330–340.
  8. Madheswaran, C.K.; Ambily, P.S.; Dattatreaya, J.K.; Rajamane, N.P. Studies on use of copper slag as replacement material for river sand in building constructions. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. A 2014, 95, 169–177.
  9. Nazer, A.; Pavez, O.; Rojas, F. Use of copper slag in cement mortar. REM Rev. Esc. Minas 2012, 65, 87–91.
  10. Shi, C.; Meyer, C.; Behnood, A. Utilization of copper slag in cement and concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2008, 52, 1115–1120.
  11. Potysz, A.; Van Hullebusch, E.D.; Kierczak, J.; Grybos, M.; Lens, P.N.L.; Guibaud, G. Copper metallurgy slags- Current knowledge and fate: A review. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. 2015, 45, 2424–2488.
  12. Palacios, J.; Sánchez, M. Wastes as resources: Update on recovery of valuable metals from copper slags. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2011, 120, 218–223.
  13. Cendoya, P. Efecto en la resistencia de las escorias de fundición de cobre como agregado fino en el comportamiento resistente del hormigón. Ingeniare Rev. Chil. Ing. 2009, 17, 85–94.
  14. Murari, K.; Siddique, R.; Jain, K.K. Use of waste copper slag, a sustainable material. J. Mater. Cycles. Waste Manag. 2015, 17, 13–26.
  15. Kambham, K.; Sangameswaran, S.; Datar, S.R.; Kura, B. Copper slag: Optimization of productivity and consumption for cleaner production in dry abrasive blasting. J. Clean Prod. 2007, 15, 465–473.
  16. Jiménez-Padilla, B. Armado de Tuberías. FMEC0108, 1st ed.; IC Editorial: Antequera, Spain, 2014.
  17. Biswas, S.; Satapathy, A. Use of copper slag in glass-epoxy composites for improved wear resistance. Waste Manag. Res. 2010, 28, 615–625.
  18. Pundhir, N.K.S.; Kamaraj, C.; Nanda, P.K. Use of copper slag as construction material in bituminous pavements. J. Sci. Ind. Res. India. 2005, 64, 997–1002.
  19. Busolic, D.; Parada, F.; Parra, R.; Sánchez, M.; Palacios, J.; Hino, M. Recovery of iron from copper flash smelting slags. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2011, 120, 32–36.
  20. Guo, Z.; Zhu, D.; Pan, J.; Wu, T.; Zhang, F. Improving beneficiation of copper and iron from copper slag by modifying the molten copper slag. Metals 2016, 6, 86.
  21. Xian-Lin, Z.; De-Qing, Z.; Jian, P.; Teng-Jiao, W. Utilization of waste copper slag to produce directly reduced iron for weathering resistant steel. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 1347–1352.
  22. Heo, J.H.; Chung, Y.; Park, J.H. Recovery of iron and removal of hazardous elements from waste copper slag via a novel aluminothermic smelting reduction (ASR) process. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 777–787.
  23. Siwiec, G.; Sozanska, M.; Blacha, L.; Smalcerz, A. Behaviour of iron during reduction of slag obtained from copper flash smelting. Metabk 2015, 54, 113–115.
  24. Sarfo, P.; Wyss, G.; Ma, G.; Das, A.; Young, C. Carbothermal reduction of copper smelter slag for recycling into pig iron and glass. Miner. Eng. 2017, 107, 8–19.
  25. Liao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Huang, F. Separating and recycling of Fe, Cu, Zn from dumped copper slag by microwave irradiation assisted carbothermic method. J. Residuals Sci. Technool. 2016, 13, S155–S160.
  26. Li, K.; Ping, S.; Wang, H.; Ni, W. Recovery of iron from copper slag by deep reduction and magnetic beneficiation. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 2013, 20, 1035–1041.
  27. Fernández-González, D.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Mochón-Castaños, J.; Sancho-Gorostiaga, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Concentrated solar energy applications in materials science and metallurgy. Sol. Energy 2018, 170, 520–540.
  28. Murray, J.P.; Flamant, G.; Roos, C.J. Silicon and solar-grade silicon production by solar dissociation of Si3N4. Sol. Energy 2006, 80, 1349–1354.
  29. Loutzenhiser, P.G.; Tuerk, O.; Steinfeld, A. Production of Si by vacuum carbothermal reduction of SiO2 using concentrated solar energy. JOM 2010, 62, 49–54.
  30. Murray, J.P. Aluminum production using high-temperature solar process heat. Sol. Energy 1999, 66, 133–142.
  31. Murray, J.P. Aluminum-silicon carbothermal reduction using high-temperature solar process heat. In Proceedings of the 128th TMS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 28 February–4 March 1999.
  32. Murray, J.P. Solar production of aluminum by direct reduction: Preliminary results for two processes. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2001, 123, 125–132.
  33. Lytvynenko, Y.M. Obtaining aluminum by the electrolysis with the solar radiation using. Appl. Sol. Energy 2013, 49, 4–6.
  34. Epstein, M.; Olalde, G.; Santén, S.; Steinfeld, A.; Wieckert, C. Towards the industrial solar carbothermal production of zinc. J. Sol. Energ. 2008, 130, 014501–014504.
  35. Fletcher, E.A.; Noring, J.E. High temperature solar electrothermal processing—Zinc from zinc oxide. Energy 1983, 8, 247–254.
  36. Fletcher, E.A.; Macdonald, F.J.; Kunnerth, D. High temperature solar electrothermal processing—II. Zinc from zinc oxide. Energy 1985, 10, 1255–1272.
  37. Palumbo, R.D.; Fletcher, E.A. High temperature solar electrothermal processing—III. Zinc from zinc oxide at 1200–1675K using a non-consumable anode. Energy 1988, 13, 319–332.
  38. Osinga, T.; Frommherz, U.; Steinfeld, A.; Wieckert, C. Experimental investigation of the solar carbothermic reduction of ZnO using a two-cavity solar reactor. J. Sol. Energ. 2004, 126, 633–637.
  39. Epstein, M.; Ehrensberger, K.; Yogev, A. Ferro-reduction of ZnO using concentrated solar energy. Energy 2004, 29, 745–756.
  40. Steinfeld, A.; Brack, M.; Meier, A.; Weidenkaff, A.; Wuillemin, D. A solar chemical reactor for co-production of zinc and synthesis gas. Energy 1998, 23, 803–814.
  41. Wieckert, C.; Palumbo, R.; Frommherz, U. A two-cavity reactor for solar chemical processes: Heat transfer model and application to carbothermic reduction of ZnO. Energy 2004, 29, 771–787.
  42. Wieckert, C.; Frommherz, U.; Kräupl, S.; Guillot, E.; Olalde, G.; Epstein, M.; Santén, S.; Osinga, T.; Steinfeld, A. A 300 kW solar chemical pilot plant for the carbothermic production of zinc. J. Sol. Energy 2006, 129, 190–196.
  43. Schunk, L.O.; Lipinski, W.; Steinfeld, A. Heat transfer model of a solar receiver-reactor for the thermal dissociation of ZnO-Experimental validation at 10 kW and scale-up to 1 MW. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 150, 502–508.
  44. Villasmil, W.; Brkic, M.; Wuillemin, D.; Meier, A.; Steinfeld, A. Pilot scale demonstration of a 100-kWth solar thermochemical plant for the thermal dissociation of ZnO. J. Sol. Energy 2013, 136, 011016–0111027.
  45. Koepft, E.; Villasmil, W.; Meier, A. Pilot-scale solar reactor operation and characterization for fuel production via the Zn/ZnO thermochemical cycle. Appl. Energy 2016, 165, 1004–1023.
  46. Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; Cañadas, I.; Rodríguez, J.; Mochón, J.; Verdeja, L.F.; García-Carcedo, F.; Vázquez, A. Magnetite production from steel wastes with concentrated solar energy. Steel Res. Int. 2013, 84, 207–217.
  47. Sibieude, F.; Ducarroir, M.; Tofighi, A.; Ambriz, J. High temperature experiments with a solar furnace: The decomposition of Fe3O4, Mn3O4, CdO. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1982, 7, 79–88.
  48. Steinfeld, A.; Fletcher, E.A. Theoretical and experimental investigation of the carbothermic reduction of Fe2O3 using solar energy. Energy 1991, 16, 1011–1019.
  49. Steinfeld, A.; Kuhn, P.; Karni, J. High-temperature solar thermochemistry: Production of iron and synthesis gas by Fe3O4-reduction with methane. Energy 1993, 18, 239–249.
  50. Fernández-González, D.; Prazuch, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Solar synthesis of calcium aluminates. Sol. Energy 2018, 171, 658–666.
  51. Mochón, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, Í.; Vázquez, A.; Fernández, D.; Ayala, J.M.; Barbés, M.F.; Verdeja, L.F. Transformations in the iron-manganese-oxygen-carbon system resulted from treatment of solar energy with high concentration. Steel Res. Int. 2014, 85, 1469–1476.
  52. Fernández-González, D.; Prazuch, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Iron Metallurgy via Concentrated Solar Energy. Metals-Basel 2018, 8, 873.
  53. Fernández-González, D.; Prazuch, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. The treatment of Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) slag with concentrated solar energy. Sol. Energy 2019, 180, 372–382.
  54. Fernández-González, D.; Prazuch, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Transformations in the Mn-O-Si system using concentrated solar energy. Sol. Energy 2019, 184, 148–152.
  55. Fernández-González, D.; Prazuch, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Transformations in the Si-O-Ca system: Silicon-calcium via solar energy. Sol. Energy 2019, 181, 414–423.
  56. Winkel, H.E. Thermal Decomposition of Copper Sulfides under Concentrated Irradiation. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2006.
  57. Fernández-González, D.; Prazuch, J.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; González-Gasca, C.; Gómez-Rodríguez, C.; Verdeja, L.F. Treatment of copper slag with concentrated solar energy. In Proceedings of the Environmental Safety-Non-Energy and Raw Materials, I International Conference on Engineering Materials, Safety, Environment and Technology, Zielona Gora, Poland, 3–4 June 2020; Gabryelewicz, I., Wedrychowicz, M., Eds.; University of Zielona Gora: Zielona Gora, Poland, 2021; pp. 39–59.
  58. Verdeja, L.F.; Sancho, J.P.; Ballester, A. Refractory and Ceramic Materials, 1st ed.; Síntesis: Madrid, Spain, 2014.
  59. Pero-Sanz, J.A.; Quintana, M.J.; Verdeja, L.F. Solidification and Solid-state Transformations of Metals and Alloys, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Boston, MA, USA, 2017.
  60. Flamant, G.; Ferriere, A.; Laplaze, D.; Monty, D. Solar processing of materials: Opportunities and new frontiers. Sol. Energy 1999, 66, 117–132.
  61. Alvarez, M.A. Environmental Impact of Plastics. J. Mater. Ed. 2018, 40, 119–124.
  62. Dobiszewska, M. Waste Materials Used in Making Mortar and Concrete. J. Mater. Ed. 2017, 39, 133–156.
  63. Fernández-González, D.; Sancho-Gorostiaga, J.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Anodic Lodes and Scrapings as a Source of Electrolytic Manganese. Metals 2018, 8, 162.
  64. Ordiales, M.; Iglesias, J.; Fernández-González, D.; Sancho-Gorostiaga, J.; Fuentes, A.; Verdeja, L.F. Cold agglomeration of Ultrafine Oxidized Dust (UOD) from ferromanganese and silicomanganese industrial process. Metals 2016, 6, 203.
  65. Fernández-González, D.; Piñuela-Noval, J.; Verdeja, L.F. Silicomanganese and ferromanganese slags treated with concentrated solar energy. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1450.
  66. Fernández-González, D. Aplicaciones de la Energía Solar Concentrada en Metalurgia y Ciencia de los Materiales. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Oviedo, Oviedo/Uviéu, Asturias, Spain, September 2019.
Subjects: Others
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : ,
View Times: 673
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 23 Jul 2021
Video Production Service