Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry related to this topic through the link below:
Check Note
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 3863 word(s) 3863 2021-05-25 08:19:20 |
2 format correct -5 word(s) 3858 2021-06-04 05:19:36 |

Benfotiamine (BFT) has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that seem to be mediated by a mechanism independent of the coenzyme function of ThDP. BFT has no adverse effects and improves cognitive outcome in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD). 

  • thiamine diphosphate
  • neurodegeneration
  • neuroprotection
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • oxidative stress
  • diabetes
  • inflammation
  • glutathione
  • glycogen synthase kinase-3
  • transketolase

1. Structure and Physico-Chemical Properties of BFT

BFT (S-benzoylthiamine O-monophosphate) is an S-acyl (thioester) derivative with an open thiazole ring and a negatively charged phosphate group. Due to the presence of the negatively charged phosphate group, BFT is practically insoluble in organic solvents [1]. It is, however, soluble in water at slightly alkaline (but not acid) pH. There can be two (E,Z) isomers differing by the substitution of the double C=C bond of the thiazolium remnant. It is obvious that only the Z isomer can regenerate the thiazolium ring characteristic of thiamine and hence only this isomer should be called “benfotiamine”.

BFT differs from another group of thiamine precursors, which are disulfides (allithiamine, SuBT, TTFD) and are uncharged hydrophobic compounds. Allithiamine is the prototype of the thiamine disulfide prodrugs. D. Loew uses the term “allithiamine” to designate all thiamine prodrugs with an open thiazole ring and that are converted to thiamine after closure of this ring [1]. However, and in agreement with D. Lonsdale [2], we think that the term allithiamine should only be used for this compound, naturally formed in crushed garlic bulbs [3] or, at most, be reserved to designate the group of thiamine disulfides. In contrast, BFT and DBT are not disulfides but thioesters. This distinction is very important, because both types of compounds have different pharmacological properties [4][5] and require different pathways for metabolization (Figure 1). Indeed, disulfides require reduction (a redox reaction) by cellular thiols such as reduced glutathione (GSH) or cysteine [1], while thioesters require hydrolysis to form the open thiamine thiol form.

Figure 1. Metabolization pathways of DBT, BFT and SuBT in an ideal cell. DBT: dibenzoylthiamine; BFT: benfotiamine; S-BT: S-benzoylthiamine; SuBT: sulbutiamine; O-BT: O-benzoylthiamine; GSH: reduced glutathione; ThDP: thiamine diphosphate. Thiamine pyrophosphokinase (TPK), the enzyme responsible for ThDP synthesis is inhibited by its product ThDP by a feedback mechanism. In eukaryotes, ThMP can only be formed by hydrolysis of ThDP. As the metabolization reactions of DBT are not clear, we use broken lines. (Figure modified from [4]).

2. Metabolism of BFT

BFT is a fairly stable polar compound that cannot diffuse through cell membranes as it is not lipophilic (in contrast to what is claimed in many articles). However, after oral administration, BFT can be rapidly dephosphorylated in the small intestine through the action of alkaline phosphatases (ectoenzymes) bound to brush-borders of epithelial cells (Figure 1) [1]. This yields S-benzoylthiamine (S-BT) which is the lipophilic metabolite of BFT that easily diffuses through cell membranes and crosses the epithelium to reach the blood stream. Its main products in human blood are thiamine and to a much lesser extent ThMP and ThDP, mainly formed in erythrocytes [6]. Note that S-BT is not used as a thiamine precursor as it is less stable than BFT. BFT has a higher bioavailability than thiamine, thiamine disulfide or TTFD [1][7]. In humans, after a single dose, the maximum thiamine concentration was dose-proportional and was reached after 1–2 h with an elimination half-life of 6-14 h inversely depending on the dose. ThMP and ThDP have a longer half-life, because they are formed and retained in erythrocytes, while thiamine is mainly present in the plasma with the excess being eliminated by the kidneys [8]. Due to the relatively long half-life, daily administration of BFT leads to an accumulation ratio of ~2, with a steady-state being reached at day 7 [6].

However, as most analytical methods are based on the detection of fluorescent thiochrome derivative, only BFT metabolites with an intact thiazolium ring are detected [5]. Other metabolites would require the use of mass spectrometric detection [4][5][9][10]. Hence, the existence of presently unknown metabolites of BFT cannot be excluded (see also Figure 1).

The requirement for dephosphorylation explains why oral administration of BFT is more efficient than parenteral routes. However, it is not known what concentrations of S-BT can be present in blood and what could be the half-life of S-BT in this compartment. It is also unknown whether significant amounts of this compound might reach the brain parenchyma. Indeed, no thiamine precursor has ever been reported to reach the brain.

In any event, probably most of the S-BT is hydrolyzed to thiamine after a few hours through the action of thioesterases in red blood cells or in the liver. Note that the first product of hydrolysis is the open thiol form of thiamine, but this form is quite unstable at physiological pH (the equilibrium being towards the closed ring form [11]) and is spontaneously converted to thiamine in the cytosol (Figure 1). In vitro, some S-BT may also undergo a molecular rearrangement to O-benzoylthiamine (O-BT, Figure 1) [12], but it is not known whether this conversion occurs in vivo.

In mice, oral treatment with BFT (100 mg/kg) strongly increases blood thiamine concentrations, the maximum being reached two hours after gavage [13]. There is also a rapid increase in thiamine and ThDP content in the liver, but not in the brain. Likewise, the brain content of thiamine derivatives remains unchanged after chronic (14 days) oral administration of BFT (100 mg/kg per day). Similar results were obtained when using mouse models of brain disorders (see below). In these studies, the mice had been fed on a thiamine-rich diet and brain ThDP content was not increased by BFT treatment. In rats, however, a recent study found a significant elevation (30–50%) in ThDP content of hippocampus and entorhinal cortex after 4-week treatment with BFT (150 mg/kg per day) [14].

We studied the metabolism of BFT in more detail in cultured neuroblastoma cells [5]. Using mass spectrometric detection and HPLC, we confirmed that BFT is unable to cross the cell membrane to a significant amount. We observed an increase in cell content of thiamine only after a lag period, when BFT was dephosphorylated to S-BT by membrane-bound phosphatases or serum phosphatases present in the culture medium. S-BT freely diffuses into the cells where it is quickly converted to thiamine, presumably through the action of intracellular thioesterases. A slower increase in cell ThDP content occurs, but only a small part of the accumulated thiamine is converted to ThDP, a reaction catalyzed by thiamine pyrophosphokinase (TPK, EC This is because ThDP tends to block its own synthesis by a feedback mechanism (Figure 1) [15]. In eukaryotes, ThMP is only formed by hydrolysis of ThDP.

3. Mechanism of Action of Benfotiamine

3.1. Effects on Glucose Metabolism and Mitochondrial Function

The mechanism underlying the cytoprotective effects of BFT was first investigated in diabetic pathologies. High glucose concentrations are believed to cause superoxide overproduction by the mitochondrial electron transport chain as well as inactivation of glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase, resulting in accumulation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and increased production of methylglyoxal and AGEs (Figure 1) [16]. In cultured endothelial cells, BFT could block three major pathways of hyperglycemic damage [17]: the hexosamine pathway, the AGE formation pathway and the diacylglycerol-protein kinase C pathway. To explain those effects, the authors proposed that BFT administration causes a removal of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate through activation of TKT, a ThDP-dependent enzyme that catalyzes a rate-limiting step in the non-oxidative part of the pentose phosphate pathway (Figure 1). BFT was thus supposed to act by increasing intracellular ThDP levels. Likewise, several investigators considered that BFT might have beneficial effects in neurodegenerative diseases as it could increase brain ThDP levels, stimulating ThDP-dependent enzymes and boosting energy metabolism [18]. It is indeed well known that disturbances in glucose metabolism are associated with the pathogenesis of AD. This disease has even been considered as an “insulin-resistant brain state” [19]. On the other hand, there are several common mechanisms associated with the neurological symptoms observed in TD and AD, notably memory loss [20]. It has been known for a long time that disturbances in ThDP-dependent steps in glucose metabolism are associated with AD [21]. For instance, there is a significant decrease in OGDHC activity [22] and ThDP content [23] in post mortem brains of AD patients. More recently, it was shown that TD increases β-amyloid accumulation in the brains of AD mouse models [24].

Neuroprotective effects of BFT were tested for the first time in 2010 showing powerful beneficial effects in a mouse model of AD [25], but this occurred without any concomitant increase in brain ThDP content. Thus, the therapeutic actions of BFT do not appear to be linked to a stimulation of glucose oxidative metabolism in this model. These findings point to a specific pharmacological effect of BFT (more probably its metabolite S-BT) or a presently unsuspected thiamine derivative.In another investigation on the neuroprotective effects of BFT in a mouse model of tauopathy, brain ThDP levels were also unchanged [26]. However, there was a significant improvement of mitochondrial function, increasing respiratory complex I immunoreactivity and superoxide dismutase activity. Interestingly, there was a marked upregulation of PGC-1α mRNA levels, suggesting that BFT treatment stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis.Mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases [27][28][29][30]. It is therefore likely that the beneficial effects of BFT administration on mitochondrial function is not restricted to the activation of the ThDP-dependent enzyme complexes PDHC and OGDHC. The mechanism of action of BFT metabolites on mitochondrial biogenesis and function remains largely unknown and deserves further investigation.

3.2. Effects of BFT on Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3)

GSK3 is a serine-threonine protein kinase originally identified as playing an important role in glycogen metabolism. However, in the last two decades it became clear that GSK3 is a much more pleiotropic enzyme, able to phosphorylate over 100 substrates and to regulate numerous cellular functions including gene transcription, apoptosis, neurodevelopment and synaptic plasticity [31].

In mammals, there are two highly homologous isoforms of GSK3, α and β [32]. The β isoform is expressed in higher levels in the brain (particularly the hippocampus) and appears to be important for the regulation of neuronal function and plasticity [31][33][34][35].

GSK3β activity is regulated at different levels [36]. An important mechanism is its inactivation through phosphorylation on serine 9, catalyzed by the kinase AKT. This occurs when the prosurvival PI3K/AKT pathway is activated by insulin or growth factors [37][38]. Thus, neuronal survival is generally associated with downregulation of GSK3β activity.

As GSK3β touches so many aspects of cellular signaling, it is not surprising that it is also involved in a huge number of pathological processes, including psychiatric diseases and neurodegeneration. Indeed, several studies suggest that GSK3β is involved in the pathogenesis of AD [39]. An obvious reason is that GSK3β is the predominant kinase that phosphorylates tau, contributing to its hyperphosphorylation and generation of neurofibrillary tangles [40]. Moreover, it has been found that inhibition of GSK3β activity decreases the production and accumulation of amyloid-β in APP-overexpressing mice [41]. Recently, it was demonstrated that specific inhibition of GSK3β (but not of GSK3α) reduced the BACE1-mediated cleavage of APP, reducing neuritic plaque formation and alleviating memory deficits in an AD transgenic mouse model [42].

These findings are consistent with the idea that the reductions in amyloid load and tau hyperphosphorylation caused by BFT treatment in APP/PS1 mice [25] could be linked to the inhibition of GSK3α/β. These authors indeed found that BFT treatment decreased the activity of GSK3, concomitant with an elevation of the phosphorylation level of the enzyme. A BFT-induced elevation of GSK3α/β phosphorylation was also found in a rat model of AD [14].

Abnormally active GSK3 has also been linked to the pathogenesis of mood disorders. In knockin mice in which one or the other isoform of GSK3 was mutated to a hyperactive form, those with hyperactive GSK3β (but not GSK3α) displayed heightened vulnerability to the learned helplessness model of depression-like behavior [36]. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis was also severely impaired. On the other hand, changes in expression and phosphorylation of GSK3β were reported in mouse models of stress-induced anxiety and depression [43]. In the prefrontal cortex, mRNA levels of GSK3β were increased in the modified swim test and when the mice were exposed to predator stress. This increase was fully reversed when the animals were treated with BFT (200 mg/kg per day).

Taken together, these findings suggest that the beneficial effects of BFT treatment in mouse models of brain disease may involve a decrease of GSK3β activity. This decrease seems to be mostly induced by phosphorylation of GSK3β on Ser 9 by AKT, though other kinases may be involved. It should be mentioned, however, that in P301S mice (a model of tauopathy), Tapias et al. did not find alterations in phospho-GSK3β expression in brain following BFT treatment [26].

3.3. Possible Involvement of the PI3K/AKT Pathway in Neuroprotection by BFT

The PI3K/AKT pathway is well known to promote cell growth and the AKT protein kinase appears to be a critical mediator of neuronal survival. It is thus conceivable that the cytoprotective effects of BFT may involve the stimulation of this pathway. It was indeed reported that BFT counteracts the toxic effects of high glucose in endothelial cells via AKT/FoxO signaling [44]. In APP/PS1 mice, BFT increased the phosphorylation level of AKT [25], thus increasing the activity of this kinase (that, in turn phosphorylates GSK3β).

Hence, BFT treatment can, at least to some extent, exert its neuroprotective effects through a stimulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, ultimately resulting in inhibition of GSK3β. However, the molecular target of BFT treatment is not identified.

3.4. Effects of BFT on the Accumulation of AGEs

Abnormal production of AGEs, a marker of impaired glucose metabolism, has been reported to occur not only in type-2 diabetes but also in neurodegenerative diseases such as AD [45][46] and mouse models of tauopathies [26]. Diabetic neuropathies and retinopathies are linked to microvascular damage. In endothelial cells, BFT (50 µM) completely prevented the accumulation of AGEs induced by high glucose [17]. This protective effect was abolished when the cells were transfected with transketolase (TKT) antisense oligonucleotides, suggesting that BFT acts through activation of TKT, a ThDP-dependent enzyme. The resulting upregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway would counteract the hyperglycemia-induced accumulation of glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate, thus reducing the production of methylglyoxal and AGEs.

In a mouse model of tauopathy BFT treatment was very effective to reduce AGE formation in brain and spinal cord [26], but the role of TKT in the protective effect is less clear. The authors reported a modest decrease of TKT activity in the brain of transgenic mice compared to control mice. There was a slight but significant increase in TKT activity in the brain of BFT-treated animals. It is not clear that such modest effects on TKT can account for the strong effects of BFT treatment on AGE accumulation. In addition, there is no evidence to show that the presence of AGEs in the transgenic mice might be linked to hyperglycemia and elevation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate in brain tissues.

As mentioned above Gibson et al. (2020) demonstrated that BFT significantly relieved the increase in AGEs in the blood of patients with mild AD during the study, but TKT activity has not been studied [45].

3.5. Antioxidant Effects of BFT

A number of studies have suggested that thiamine and its derivatives may protect the brain from oxidative damage. Indeed, oxidative stress is known to be associated with TD [47][48]. On the other hand, it is well known that the brain is particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress via its high oxygen consumption, and oxidative damage increases in the aging brain, especially if neurodegeneration occurs. It was thus appealing to consider that the beneficial effects of treatments with thiamine precursors in nerve and brain pathologies may be linked, at least in part, to antioxidant effects.

An early publication suggested that BFT alleviates diabetes-induced cerebral oxidative damage, independently of AGEs [49]. A more recent study showed that, in a mouse model of anxiety and depression caused by predation stress, there is an increase of protein carbonylation (a marker of oxidative stress) in the hippocampus of stressed mice. This increase is fully reversed by treatment with BFT or high doses of thiamine [50]. Similar results were reported with mice submitted to chronic ultrasound exposure [51].

In a transgenic mouse model of tauopathy, oxidative damage (lipid peroxidation) in spinal cord sections is reversed by BFT (200 mg/mg per day) [26]. This treatment also increases the expression of thioredoxin and some oxidative stress-protective enzymes known to be under the control of the transcription factor Nrf2. Under normal conditions, Nrf2 remains sequestered in the cytoplasm through its binding to Keap1. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) or electrophilic compounds can react with Keap1 and dissociate it from Nrf2, which can then diffuse to the nucleus, where it can bind to a promoter element called the antioxidant response element (ARE). This activates the expression of a battery of genes involved in protection against oxidative stress [52].

Tapias et al. [26] proposed a model in which putative products of BFT metabolism such as S-BT and O-BT (Figure 1) would react with Keap1 and allow Nrf2 to enter the nucleus and activate the expression of antioxidant genes. They indeed showed that, in embryonic fibroblasts, BFT, S-BT and O-BT could stimulate the expression of Nrf2-dependent genes, but only at very high concentrations (100 µM). It seems very unlikely that such high concentrations of BFT metabolites can be reached in the brain parenchyma. In any event, it should be recalled that, so far, no metabolite of BFT other than thiamine could be detected in the blood, let alone in the brain.

Antioxidant effects of BFT were also studied in vitro. In cultured neuroblastoma cells, BFT (25–50 µM) protected the cells from paraquat-induced cell death [5]. Paraquat is known to be toxic to many cell types, including neurons, through the production of ROS, particularly superoxide anions. Paraquat increases protein carbonylation in mouse neuroblastoma cells and this was relieved by BFT. The protective effects of BFT seem to be linked to the accumulation of high concentrations of thiamine rather than the coenzyme ThDP in the cells. However, the protection against ROS toxicity was not due to a direct interaction of thiamine with ROS. It is thus likely that the protective effects of BFT are linked to an indirect mechanism.

An obvious possibility is that the accumulation of intracellular thiamine might activate the Nrf2/ARE pathway. However, this pathway was only weakly activated by BFT treatment. This is not surprising as thiamine has only poor electrophilic properties and should not easily react with Keap1 [26]. It could be argued that protection of the cells may be due to the presence of intracellular S-BT, this metabolite of BFT being more likely to react with Keap1 [26]. However, there is little accumulation of S-BT in the cytoplasm, as it is quickly converted to thiamine by thioesterases. In addition, SuBT, a disulfide precursor of thiamine which cannot be converted to S-BT is practically as effective as BFT to protect the cells from paraquat toxicity. These data are strong evidence that, in cultured neuroblastoma cells, the active metabolite of BFT is thiamine, although it cannot be excluded that some unknown metabolite of thiamine might be more active. Those in vitro studies also strongly suggest that the stimulation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway is not sufficient to explain all the antioxidant effects of BFT. Hence, alternative mechanisms should be explored. As mentioned above, BFT treatment can improve mitochondrial biogenesis and function (increasing the activity of superoxide dismutase) but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. On the other hand, in BV2 microglial cells, BFT (50–250 µM) markedly increases the glutathione content of the cells [53]. This suggests that enzymes of glutathione metabolism are possible targets for the antioxidant actions of BFT. Microglial cells are resident macrophage-like immune cells of the nervous system. Overactivation of microglia induces the production of neurotoxic reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. This process is likely to play an important role in neurodegenerative processes [54].

3.6. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of BFT

According to earlier studies (see [55]), TD is associated not only with oxidative stress in brain but also with inflammatory processes such as microglial activation [56]. This raises the possibility that thiamine precursors may exert anti-inflammatory actions. Indeed, BFT treatment relieves inflammatory pain in rats [57]. P301S mice (a model of tauopathy) have increased immunoreactivity of iNOS, COX-2, TNF-α and IL-1β in spinal cord neurons and this was counteracted by chronic treatment with BFT [26].

The potential mechanism of the anti-inflammatory effects of BFT was studied in vitro. In human macrophages treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a well-known inducer of inflammation in these cells, caused the appearance of cytotoxic signals [58]. This response was significantly suppressed in the presence of 100 µM BFT. BFT downregulated proapoptotic signals and decreased the production of inflammatory marker proteins such as iNOS and COX-2. Further, phosphorylation and degradation of IκB and consequent activation and nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB were significantly prevented by BFT.

In basal conditions, NF-κB is sequestered in the cytoplasm through binding to IκB. When the inflammatory process is induced (e.g., by LPS), NF-κB separates from IκB and can diffuse to the nucleus where it induces the expression of proinflammatory genes such as iNOS and TNF-α. IκB is thus a possible target for an active metabolite of BFT.

BFT counteracts the morphological changes corresponding to the LPS-induced activation of the microglial cells. In addition, it decreases the production of proinflammatory mediators such as iNOS, COX-2, TNF-α and IL6. These effects of BFT are likely mediated by suppression of NF-κB translocation to the nucleus. BFT also suppresses phosphorylation of the kinases ERK1/2, JNK and AKT [59]. Another study suggested that BFT inhibits the release of proinflammatory metabolites of arachidonic acid in macrophages [60].

However, all these effects require rather high concentrations (50–250 µM) of BFT and they may thus not be relevant in vivo. Notwithstanding, thiamine administration in high doses clearly has anti-inflammatory properties in vivo [61].

3.7. Effects of BFT on Glutamate Receptors, Synaptic Plasticity and Neurogenesis

Several studies have shown that BFT treatment can improve learning and memory in mouse models of brain pathologies. This was the case in APP/PS1 mice, a model of AD [25] and in P301S mice, a model of tauopathy [26]. These observations led to consider the possibility that BFT treatment might increase the expression of NMDA receptors in the brain. These receptors indeed play an essential role in memory formation in the hippocampus and are altered in many brain pathologies including neurodegenerative diseases and depression [62].

BFT treatment increases cognitive abilities in rats treated by intracerebroventricular injections of streptozotocin, a model of AD. There was a simultaneous increase in the expression of the NMDA-type-glutamate receptor subunit 2B (GluN2B) in hippocampus and entorhinal cortex [14].

AMPA-type glutamate receptors are tetramers composed of subunits GluA1-4. They mediate fast synaptic transmission involved in neuroplastic processes. In mice exposed to chronic ultrasound exposure (resulting in aggressive behavior), Gorlova et al. reported altered AMPA receptors subunits expression and decreased expression of plasticity markers PSD95, PSA-NCAM and β-catenin [51]. The administration of thiamine or BFT (200 mg/kg per day) decreased aggression, reversed ultrasound-induced changes in GluA1 and GluA2 subunit expression and reversed the decreased expression of plasticity markers.

The effect of BFT treatment on neurogenesis was studied in mice exposed to predator stress for five consecutive nights. In this model, there is a marked, stress-induced, decrease of proliferation (number of Ki67-positive cells) and survival (number of BrdU-positive cells) of newborn immature neurons in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus. These reductions were counteracted by treatment with thiamine or BFT, the latter being the most effective [50].


  1. Loew, D. Pharmacokinetics of Thiamine Derivatives Especially of Benfotiamine. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 34, 47–50.
  2. Lonsdale, D. Benfotiamine and Allithiamine Should Be Differentiated. Townsend Lett. Dr. Patients 2004, 257, 102.
  3. Fujiwara, M.; Watanabe, H.; Katsui, K. Allithiamine, a Newly Found Derivative of Vitamin B1. J. Biochem. 1954, 41, 29–39.
  4. Sambon, M.; Gorlova, A.; Demelenne, A.; Alhama-Riba, J.; Coumans, B.; Lakaye, B.; Wins, P.; Fillet, M.; Anthony, D.C.; Strekalova, T.; et al. Dibenzoylthiamine Has Powerful Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties in Cultured Cells and in Mouse Models of Stress and Neurodegeneration. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 361.
  5. Sambon, M.; Napp, A.; Demelenne, A.; Vignisse, J.; Wins, P.; Fillet, M.; Bettendorff, L. Thiamine and Benfotiamine Protect Neuroblastoma Cells against Paraquat and β-Amyloid Toxicity by a Coenzyme-Independent Mechanism. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01710.
  6. Sheng, L.; Cao, W.; Lin, P.; Chen, W.; Xu, H.; Zhong, C.; Yuan, F.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Liu, C.; et al. Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of Benfotiamine in Healthy Subjects. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2021, 15, 1101–1110.
  7. Bitsch, R.; Wolf, M.; Moller, J.; Heuzeroth, L.; Gruneklee, D. Bioavailability Assessment of the Lipophilic Benfotiamine as Compared to a Water-Soluble Thiamin Derivative. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1991, 35, 292–296.
  8. Gangolf, M.; Czerniecki, J.; Radermecker, M.; Detry, O.; Nisolle, M.; Jouan, C.; Martin, D.; Chantraine, F.; Lakaye, B.; Wins, P.; et al. Thiamine Status in Humans and Content of Phosphorylated Thiamine Derivatives in Biopsies and Cultured Cells. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13616.
  9. Kim, J.; Jonus, H.C.; Zastre, J.A.; Bartlett, M.G. Development of an IPRP-LC-MS/MS Method to Determine the Fate of Intracellular Thiamine in Cancer Cells. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life. Sci. 2019, 1124, 247–255.
  10. Jonus, H.C.; Byrnes, C.C.; Kim, J.; Valle, M.L.; Bartlett, M.G.; Said, H.M.; Zastre, J.A. Thiamine Mimetics Sulbutiamine and Benfotiamine as a Nutraceutical Approach to Anticancer Therapy. Biomed. Pharm. Biomed. Pharm. 2020, 121, 109648.
  11. Duclos, J.M.; Haake, P. Ring Opening of Thiamine Analogs. The Role of Ring Opening in Physiological Function. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 5358–5362.
  12. Hurt, J.K.; Coleman, J.L.; Fitzpatrick, B.J.; Taylor-Blake, B.; Bridges, A.S.; Vihko, P.; Zylka, M.J. Prostatic Acid Phosphatase Is Required for the Antinociceptive Effects of Thiamine and Benfotiamine. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48562.
  13. Volvert, M.L.; Seyen, S.; Piette, M.; Evrard, B.; Gangolf, M.; Plumier, J.C.; Bettendorff, L. Benfotiamine, a Synthetic S-Acyl Thiamine Derivative, Has Different Mechanisms of Action and a Different Pharmacological Profile than Lipid-Soluble Thiamine Disulfide Derivatives. BMC Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 10.
  14. de Moraes, R.C.M.; Singulani, M.P.; de Gonçalves, A.C.; Portari, G.V.; da Silva Torrão, A. Oral Benfotiamine Reverts Cognitive Deficit and Increase Thiamine Diphosphate Levels in the Brain of a Rat Model of Neurodegeneration. Exp. Gerontol. 2020, 141, 111097.
  15. Voskoboyev, A.I.; Ostrovsky, Y.M. Thiamin Pyrophosphokinase: Structure, Properties, and Role in Thiamin Metabolism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1982, 378, 161–176.
  16. Brownlee, M. The Pathobiology of Diabetic Complications: A Unifying Mechanism. Diabetes 2005, 54, 1615–1625.
  17. Hammes, H.P.; Du, X.; Edelstein, D.; Taguchi, T.; Matsumura, T.; Ju, Q.; Lin, J.; Bierhaus, A.; Nawroth, P.; Hannak, D.; et al. Benfotiamine Blocks Three Major Pathways of Hyperglycemic Damage and Prevents Experimental Diabetic Retinopathy. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 294–299.
  18. Gibson, G.E.; Blass, J.P. Thiamine-Dependent Processes and Treatment Strategies in Neurodegeneration. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 1605–1619.
  19. Steen, E.; Terry, B.M.; Rivera, E.J.; Cannon, J.L.; Neely, T.R.; Tavares, R.; Xu, X.J.; Wands, J.R.; de la Monte, S.M. Impaired Insulin and Insulin-like Growth Factor Expression and Signaling Mechanisms in Alzheimer’s Disease--Is This Type 3 Diabetes? J. Alzheimers Dis. JAD 2005, 7, 63–80.
  20. Gibson, G.E.; Hirsch, J.A.; Fonzetti, P.; Jordan, B.D.; Cirio, R.T.; Elder, J. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) and Dementia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1367, 21–30.
  21. Butterworth, R.F.; Besnard, A.M. Thiamine-Dependent Enzyme Changes in Temporal Cortex of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Metab. Brain Dis. 1990, 5, 179–184.
  22. Mastrogiacomo, F.; Bergeron, C.; Kish, S.J. Brain Alpha-Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase Complex Activity in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Neurochem. 1993, 61, 2007–2014.
  23. Mastrogiacomo, F.; Bettendorff, L.; Grisar, T.; Kish, S.J. Brain Thiamine, Its Phosphate Esters, and Its Metabolizing Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. Ann. Neurol. 1996, 39, 585–591.
  24. Karuppagounder, S.S.; Xu, H.; Shi, Q.; Chen, L.H.; Pedrini, S.; Pechman, D.; Baker, H.; Beal, M.F.; Gandy, S.E.; Gibson, G.E. Thiamine Deficiency Induces Oxidative Stress and Exacerbates the Plaque Pathology in Alzheimer’s Mouse Model. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 1587–1600.
  25. Pan, X.; Gong, N.; Zhao, J.; Yu, Z.; Gu, F.; Chen, J.; Sun, X.; Zhao, L.; Yu, M.; Xu, Z.; et al. Powerful Beneficial Effects of Benfotiamine on Cognitive Impairment and Beta-Amyloid Deposition in Amyloid Precursor Protein/Presenilin-1 Transgenic Mice. Brain 2010, 133, 1342–1351.
  26. Tapias, V.; Jainuddin, S.; Ahuja, M.; Stack, C.; Elipenahli, C.; Vignisse, J.; Gerges, M.; Starkova, N.; Xu, H.; Starkov, A.A.; et al. Benfotiamine Treatment Activates the Nrf2/ARE Pathway and Is Neuroprotective in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Tauopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018, 27, 2874–2892.
  27. Lin, M.T.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nature 2006, 443, 787–795.
  28. Johri, A.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 342, 619–630.
  29. Liang, W.S.; Reiman, E.M.; Valla, J.; Dunckley, T.; Beach, T.G.; Grover, A.; Niedzielko, T.L.; Schneider, L.E.; Mastroeni, D.; Caselli, R.; et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Is Associated with Reduced Expression of Energy Metabolism Genes in Posterior Cingulate Neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4441–4446.
  30. Lee, T.; Lee, H. Shared Blood Transcriptomic Signatures between Alzheimer’s Disease and Diabetes Mellitus. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 34.
  31. Beurel, E.; Grieco, S.F.; Jope, R.S. Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 (GSK3): Regulation, Actions, and Diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 148, 114–131.
  32. Kaidanovich-Beilin, O.; Woodgett, J.R. GSK-3: Functional Insights from Cell Biology and Animal Models. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2011, 4, 40.
  33. Woodgett, J.R. Molecular Cloning and Expression of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3/Factor A. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 2431–2438.
  34. Perez-Costas, E.; Gandy, J.C.; Melendez-Ferro, M.; Roberts, R.C.; Bijur, G.N. Light and Electron Microscopy Study of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta in the Mouse Brain. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8911.
  35. Peineau, S.; Taghibiglou, C.; Bradley, C.; Wong, T.P.; Liu, L.; Lu, J.; Lo, E.; Wu, D.; Saule, E.; Bouschet, T.; et al. LTP Inhibits LTD in the Hippocampus via Regulation of GSK3beta. Neuron 2007, 53, 703–717.
  36. Pardo, M.; Abrial, E.; Jope, R.S.; Beurel, E. GSK3β Isoform-Selective Regulation of Depression, Memory and Hippocampal Cell Proliferation. Genes Brain Behav. 2016, 15, 348–355.
  37. Cross, D.A.; Alessi, D.R.; Cohen, P.; Andjelkovich, M.; Hemmings, B.A. Inhibition of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 by Insulin Mediated by Protein Kinase B. Nature 1995, 378, 785–789.
  38. Beaulieu, J.-M.; Gainetdinov, R.R.; Caron, M.G. Akt/GSK3 Signaling in the Action of Psychotropic Drugs. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 49, 327–347.
  39. Hooper, C.; Killick, R.; Lovestone, S. The GSK3 Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Neurochem. 2008, 104, 1433–1439.
  40. Takashima, A. GSK-3 Is Essential in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2006, 9, 309–317.
  41. Rockenstein, E.; Torrance, M.; Adame, A.; Mante, M.; Bar-on, P.; Rose, J.B.; Crews, L.; Masliah, E. Neuroprotective Effects of Regulators of the Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta Signaling Pathway in a Transgenic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Are Associated with Reduced Amyloid Precursor Protein Phosphorylation. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 1981–1991.
  42. Ly, P.T.T.; Wu, Y.; Zou, H.; Wang, R.; Zhou, W.; Kinoshita, A.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Y.; Cai, F.; Woodgett, J.; et al. Inhibition of GSK3β-Mediated BACE1 Expression Reduces Alzheimer-Associated Phenotypes. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 224–235.
  43. Markova, N.; Bazhenova, N.; Anthony, D.C.; Vignisse, J.; Svistunov, A.; Lesch, K.-P.; Bettendorff, L.; Strekalova, T. Thiamine and Benfotiamine Improve Cognition and Ameliorate GSK-3β-Associated Stress-Induced Behaviours in Mice. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 75, 148–156.
  44. Marchetti, V.; Menghini, R.; Rizza, S.; Vivanti, A.; Feccia, T.; Lauro, D.; Fukamizu, A.; Lauro, R.; Federici, M. Benfotiamine Counteracts Glucose Toxicity Effects on Endothelial Progenitor Cell Differentiation via Akt/FoxO Signaling. Diabetes 2006, 55, 2231–2237.
  45. Gibson, G.E.; Luchsinger, J.A.; Cirio, R.; Chen, H.; Franchino-Elder, J.; Hirsch, J.A.; Bettendorff, L.; Chen, Z.; Flowers, S.; Gerber, L.; et al. Benfotiamine and Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease: Results of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase IIa Clinical Trial. J. Alzheimers Dis. JAD 2020, 78, 989–1010.
  46. Kuhla, A.; Ludwig, S.C.; Kuhla, B.; Münch, G.; Vollmar, B. Advanced Glycation End Products Are Mitogenic Signals and Trigger Cell Cycle Reentry of Neurons in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Neurobiol. Aging 2015, 36, 753–761.
  47. Calingasan, N.Y.; Chun, W.J.; Park, L.C.; Uchida, K.; Gibson, G.E. Oxidative Stress Is Associated with Region-Specific Neuronal Death during Thiamine Deficiency. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1999, 58, 946–958.
  48. Langlais, P.J.; Anderson, G.; Guo, S.X.; Bondy, S.C. Increased Cerebral Free Radical Production during Thiamine Deficiency. Metab. Brain Dis. 1997, 12, 137–143.
  49. Wu, S.; Ren, J. Benfotiamine Alleviates Diabetes-Induced Cerebral Oxidative Damage Independent of Advanced Glycation End-Product, Tissue Factor and TNF-Alpha. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 394, 158–162.
  50. Vignisse, J.; Sambon, M.; Gorlova, A.; Pavlov, D.; Caron, N.; Malgrange, B.; Shevtsova, E.; Svistunov, A.; Anthony, D.C.; Markova, N.; et al. Thiamine and Benfotiamine Prevent Stress-Induced Suppression of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Mice Exposed to Predation without Affecting Brain Thiamine Diphosphate Levels. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 82, 126–136.
  51. Gorlova, A.; Pavlov, D.; Anthony, D.C.; Ponomarev, E.; Sambon, M.; Proshin, A.; Shafarevich, I.; Babaevskaya, D.; Lesch, K.-P.; Bettendorff, L.; et al. Thiamine and Benfotiamine Counteract Ultrasound-Induced Aggression, Normalize AMPA Receptor Expression and Plasticity Markers, and Reduce Oxidative Stress in Mice. Neuropharmacology 2019, 156, 107543.
  52. Tebay, L.E.; Robertson, H.; Durant, S.T.; Vitale, S.R.; Penning, T.M.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Hayes, J.D. Mechanisms of Activation of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 by Redox Stressors, Nutrient Cues, and Energy Status and the Pathways through Which It Attenuates Degenerative Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 108–146.
  53. Bozic, I.; Savic, D.; Stevanovic, I.; Pekovic, S.; Nedeljkovic, N.; Lavrnja, I. Benfotiamine Upregulates Antioxidative System in Activated BV-2 Microglia Cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 351.
  54. Hansen, D.V.; Hanson, J.E.; Sheng, M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 459–472.
  55. Hazell, A.S.; Butterworth, R.F. Update of Cell Damage Mechanisms in Thiamine Deficiency: Focus on Oxidative Stress, Excitotoxicity and Inflammation. Alcohol. Alcohol. 2009, 44, 141–147.
  56. Todd, K.G.; Butterworth, R.F. Early Microglial Response in Experimental Thiamine Deficiency: An Immunohistochemical Analysis. Glia 1999, 25, 190–198.
  57. Sanchez-Ramirez, G.M.; Caram-Salas, N.L.; Rocha-Gonzalez, H.I.; Vidal-Cantu, G.C.; Medina-Santillan, R.; Reyes-Garcia, G.; Granados-Soto, V. Benfotiamine Relieves Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain in Rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 530, 48–53.
  58. Yadav, U.C.S.; Kalariya, N.M.; Srivastava, S.K.; Ramana, K.V. Protective Role of Benfotiamine, a Fat-Soluble Vitamin B1 Analogue, in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cytotoxic Signals in Murine Macrophages. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 1423–1434.
  59. Bozic, I.; Savic, D.; Laketa, D.; Bjelobaba, I.; Milenkovic, I.; Pekovic, S.; Nedeljkovic, N.; Lavrnja, I. Benfotiamine Attenuates Inflammatory Response in LPS Stimulated BV-2 Microglia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118372.
  60. Shoeb, M.; Ramana, K.V. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Benfotiamine Are Mediated through the Regulation of the Arachidonic Acid Pathway in Macrophages. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 182–190.
  61. Vatsalya, V.; Li, F.; Frimodig, J.; Gala, K.S.; Srivastava, S.; Kong, M.; Ramchandani, V.A.; Feng, W.; Zhang, X.; McClain, C.J. Repurposing Treatment of Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome for Th-17 Cell Immune Storm Syndrome and Neurological Symptoms in COVID-19: Thiamine Efficacy and Safety, In-Vitro Evidence and Pharmacokinetic Profile. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 598128.
  62. Clayton, D.A.; Grosshans, D.R.; Browning, M.D. Aging and Surface Expression of Hippocampal NMDA Receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 14367–14369.
Contributor :
View Times: 230
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Time: 04 Jun 2021
Table of Contents


    Are you sure to Delete?

    Video Upload Options

    Do you have a full video?
    If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
    Bettendorff, L. Benfotiamine. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 29 June 2022).
    Bettendorff L. Benfotiamine. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 29, 2022.
    Bettendorff, Lucien. "Benfotiamine," Encyclopedia, (accessed June 29, 2022).
    Bettendorff, L. (2021, June 03). Benfotiamine. In Encyclopedia.
    Bettendorff, Lucien. ''Benfotiamine.'' Encyclopedia. Web. 03 June, 2021.