Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
samy shaban
 + 2326 word(s) 2326 2021-02-17 06:03:26 |
2 Format correct
Vicky Zhou
 Meta information modification 2326 2021-02-23 07:00:16 | |
3 Format correct
Vicky Zhou
 -3 word(s) 2323 2021-02-23 07:32:09 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Shaban, S. Aptamer Sensors. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/7467 (accessed on 20 April 2024).
Shaban S. Aptamer Sensors. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/7467. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Shaban, Samy. "Aptamer Sensors" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/7467 (accessed April 20, 2024).
Shaban, S. (2021, February 22). Aptamer Sensors. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/7467
Shaban, Samy. "Aptamer Sensors." Encyclopedia. Web. 22 February, 2021.
Aptamer Sensors
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/s21030979

Recently, aptamers have attracted attention in the biosensing field as signal recognition elements because of their high binding affinity toward specific targets such as proteins, cells, small molecules, and even metal ions. Aptamers have intrinsic advantages, such as their availability for both chemical modifications and conjugation with different labels, facilitating their ability to be used to construct a sensitive and highly selective platform sensor. Aptamers can be easily functionalized and engineered, providing several signaling modes such as colorimetric, fluorometric, and electrochemical, in what is known as aptasensors.

aptamer colorimetric aptasensor

1. Introduction

Owing to the advances in various areas of life, the population has become more exposed to pollutants, whether from industry, agriculture, or medical waste, resulting in an increase in the pollution associated with humans’ daily lives, leading to an increase in the rate of diseases. In this context, the development of fast, simple, low-cost, high-sensitivity, and specific sensors for detecting pollutants or early stages of diseases is important.

Because of the great advances in molecular biology and genetic engineering, the use of RNA and DNA has expanded not only in biology, for storing and transmitting genetic information, but also in the identification of antibiotics, proteins, peptides, amino acids, and even small molecules. Gold et al. and Szostak et al. reported the first studies involving a specific targeting affinity toward proteins.

Aptamers consist of 3D-folded structures of single-stranded oligonucleotides with lengths of usually 20–60 bases of nucleotides selected in vitro via the systematic evolution of ligand exponential enrichment (SELEX) process. The SELEX process is applicable for single targets, complex target structures, or even mixtures without proper knowledge of their composition. SELEX can be used to select aptamers with high affinities and specificities for their targets and low dissociation-constant values, across the low nanomolar to picomolar range. Aptamers can be selected through the in vitro process independent of animals or cell lines. The selection of aptamers for toxic target molecules or molecules with no or low immunogenicity is possible. Different modifications can be introduced in the basic SELEX process for the selection of the desired aptamer specifications for a specific application. The aptamers can be functional for native conformations of target molecules on live cells, so cell surface transmembrane proteins can be considered as targets.

This systematic review is focused on recent approaches to aptamer engineering for biorecognition for several objectives. Herein, previous and current advances related to aptamer-based sensing protocols are provided, highlighting the possible detected signals, with a focus on the use of different nanomaterials with distinct configurations. The most significant studies on aptasensor development have been collected, providing the possible strategies available for using aptasensors. Moreover, a deep discussion on colorimetric, fluorescence and electrochemical detection strategies is provided

2. Colorimetric Aptasensor

Among the available assay recognition signals, colorimetric methods are considered simple and efficient with a great potential for point-of-care diagnostics, as the detection responses are simply visually discerned by the naked eye using simple, low-cost, and effective instrumental techniques. The basic colorimetric strategies involve the detection of the target by a color change through the naked eye and simple instrumentation. Colorimetric biosensors based on aptamers have demonstrated their sensitivity and selectivity, in addition to their effective potential for rapid onsite diagnosis without complicated instrumentation. However, the colorimetric aptasensor has some limitations such as the influence of color from samples; the time-consuming nature of the fabrication process, which is highly demanded in clinical diagnosis; and the small range of optimized pH solutions.

3. Fluorescence Aptasensor

Fluorescence-based aptasensors are characterized by high sensitivity, large-detection ranges, multiplexing capabilities, rapid assaying, and the highly selective recognition of aptamers for several targets, which can be distinguished under UV light, in comparison with the colorimetric sensor’s. The integration of both fluorescent materials (fluorophore dyes and fluorescent nanoparticles such as upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), GO, and CQDs) and aptamers can produce high sensitivity and selectivity, and a rapid analysis strategy, making them useful candidates for fluorescence-aptasensor bioassays [1][2][3]. The recognition affinity between aptamers and analytes induces conformational changes in the aptamer. This process can trigger changes in the fluorescent emission properties of the fluorophore dye or fluorescent nanomaterials, owing to changes in the original environments of these materials.

The design of fluorescent aptasensors requires the use of hairpin aptamers (aptabeacons), which are labeled with either a fluorophore or a quencher. Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) typically uses a donor fluorophore and an acceptor quencher material. Different strategies are often employed via FRET operations, which are performed through either “signal-on” or “signal-off” assaying protocols. These operations are based on the disparity in the fluorescence responses of the fluorophores as a function of the potential and unique aptamer–target binding and the conformational-change degree [4][5][6]. Owing to the conformational change of the aptamer induced via target interactions, the probe was successfully switched on/off via the FRET mechanism.

4. Electrochemical Aptasensor

An electrochemical aptasensor was fabricated using an aptamer as a bioreceptor and an electrochemical transducer, which translated the target–aptamer affinity into a measurable electrochemical signal through potentiometry, voltammetry, amperometry, impedimetric, or electrochemiluminescence. The potentiometric approach involves the measurement of the potential between the probe and the reference electrode without any net charge transfer. The amperometric approach is based on applying a potential and allowing a redox reaction to occur. The signal is defined as the current between the electrode and the counter-electrode. The voltammetric strategy includes the sweeping potential over time and recording the corresponding current; this strategy is based on a three-electrode system, with working, reference, and counter electrodes. The impedimetric technique involves measuring the charge transfer rate on the surface of the electrode for a kinetic study.

The electrochemical aptasensors were modified with various nanomaterials such as carbon-based nanomaterials, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), AuNPs, and polymers for signal amplification [7][8][9][10]. The aptamers were immobilized on the electrode surface via π–π interactions, hydrogel grafts, biotin-avidin interactions, thiol–gold self-assembly, and carboxyl–amine covalent reactions.

The electrochemical aptasensor mainly depends on the interactions occurring on the surface of the transducer as a result of the induced reaction between the target and its specific aptamer, providing amperometric or potentiometric electrochemical signals. Another technique is based on the increase in charge transfer resistance via the impedance technique. Therefore, an electrochemical aptasensor was provided for the detection of several targets, such as ampicillin (AMP), avian influenza virus (H5N1), carbohydrate antigen 125, Pb2+, lysozymes, insulin, thrombin, CD44, vanillin, circulating human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, bisphenol A, furaneol, and Hg2+, among others.

5. Conclusions and Future Outlook

The distinctive and impressive advantages of aptamers compared with antibodies permit them to be preferred in molecular diagnostics for a wide range of biomarkers. Aptamers have intrinsic advantages, such as their availability for both chemical modifications and conjugation with different labels, facilitating their ability to be used to construct a sensitive and highly selective platform sensor. The simplicity and small sizes of the aptamers combined with the versatile optical properties and large surface areas of nanomaterials leads to a platform with great potential for highly sensitive and selective biological recognition and signal transduction for various analytes such as metals, small molecules, toxins, proteins, cells, and bacteria with lower LODs and high sensitivity and selectivity.

Each detection method with its own different strategies was emphasized briefly with schematic designs and all the aptamer information, including the detection ranges of the discussed aptasensors, summarized in Table 1. Each aptasensor method has advantages, but the limitations of each method have to be considered before assaying the biomarkers. The optical strategies are considered promising assay methods, as a sensitive response could be achieved; however, some limitations should be considered before assigning a suitable strategy. The colorimetric aptasensor sensors are considered more promising for point of case testing (POCT) owing to naked-eye readout; however, their sensitivity fails to meet the required criteria owing to the higher LODs compared to other methods. Moreover, some limitations were demonstrated in the AuNP–salt-induced aggregation, in which the surface of the AuNP was easily accessible by several targets and aptamers, affecting the reliability of the sensor. This hurdle was overcome by using a strong capping agent [11][12][13]. Despite the fact that the fluorescent aptasensor achieved a high sensitivity for the assay of different targets compared to colorimetric, it requires laboratories and clinical centers with infrastructure for achieving POCT diagnosis, and the limitations of the photobleaching of the fluorescent molecules over time, compromising their stability, is considered an obstacle regarding fluorescent aptasensor development. Generally, electrochemical aptasensors are rapid, easy, and higher in sensitivity compared to optical sensors, making them the best candidates for the on-site rapid assay of biomarkers.

Table 1. Examples of application of aptasensors for quantitative detection.

Sensor Type Target Aptamer Sequence Detection Range LOD Ref.
Colorimetric E. coli Fp: TAGGGAAGAGAAGGACATATGAT, Rp: TTGACTAGTACATGACCACTTGA) 101–108 cells/mL 101 cells/mL [14]
Malathion 5′-TAT ACA CAA TTG TTT TTC TCT TAA CTT CTT GAC TGC-3′ 0–4000 ng/L 5.24 ng/L [15]
Cd2+ 5′-CTCAGGACGACGGGTTCACAGTCCGTTGTC-3′ 1–400 ng/L 1 ng/L [16]
Salmonella typhimurium Apt1: 5′-biotin-GAGGAAAGTCTATAGCAGAGGAGATGTGTGAACCGAGTAA-3′ 3.3 × 101–3.3 × 106 CFU/mL 33 CFU/mL [17]
Apt2: 5′-CTCCTCTGACTGTAACCACGGAGTTAATCAATACAAGGCGGGAACATCCTTGGCGGTGCCGCATAGGTAGTCCAGAAGCC-3′
Salmonella typhimurium NH2-GCGCTCGGCCTCCTCTGCCATCTCATTCGCGAGCGC 100–109 CFU/mL 16 CFU/mL [18]
AFM1 5-Biotin-ACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACAT-3′ 0.3–75 ng/mL 0.03 ng/mL [19]
AFB1 5′-GTTGGGCACGTGTTGTCTCTCTGTGTCTCGTGCCCTTCGCTAGGCCCACA-3′ 1–6 ng/mL 0.18 ng/mL [20]
Salmonella typhimurium Apt1 5′-AGT AAT GCC CGG TAG TTA TTC AAA GAT GAG TAG GAA AAG A-C6-SH-3′ 101–106 CFU mL−1 1 CFU/mL [21]
Apt2 5′-TAT GGC GGC GTC ACC CGA CGG GGA CTT GAC ATT ATG ACA G-C6-SH-3′
ABA AAAATGGGTTAGGTGGAGGTGGTTATTCCGGGAATTCGCCCTAAATACGAGCAAC 1 nM to 10 μM 0.51 nM [22]
Cortisol 5′-GGA ATG GAT CCA CAT CCA TGG ATG GGC AAT GCG GGG TGG AGA ATG GTT GCC GCA CTT CGG CTT CAC TGC AGA CTT GAC GAA GCT T-3′ 0.1–1000 nM 0.1 nM [23]
Thrombin TBA1 (5′-thiolated-TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT GGT TGG TGT GGT TGG-3′) 0–10 μg/mL 1.33 μg/mL [24]
TBA2 (5′-thiolated-TTT TTA GTC CGT GGT AGG GCA GGT TGG GGT GAC T-3′)
Cd2+ 5′-biotin-ACC GAC CGT GCT GGA CTC TGG ACT GTT GTG GTA TTA TTT TTG GTT GTG CAG TAT GAG CGA GCG TTG CG-3 1–500 ng/mL 0.7 ng/mL [25]
PDGF-BB 5′-CAGGCTACGGCACGTAGAGCATCACCATGATCCTG-3′ 1–25 pM 0.94 pM [26]
ATP 5′-ACC TGG GGG AGT ATT GCG GAG GAA GGT-3′ 0.50–100 μM 0.09 μM [27]
Pb2+ 5′-biotin-GGGTGGGTGGGTGGGT-3′ 1–300 ng/mL 0.63 ng/mL [28]
E. coli Apt1: 5′-biotin-TGAGCCCAAGCCCTGGTATGCGGATAACGAGGTATTCACGACTGGTCGTCAGGTATGGTTGGCAGGTCTACTTTGGGATC-3′ 16 to 1.6 × 106 CFU/mL 2 CFU/mL [29]
Apt1: 5′-biotin-TGAGCCCAAGCCCTGGTATGAGCCCACGGAACACTGGTCGCGCCCACTGGTTTCTATATTGGCAGGTCTACTTTGGGATC-3′
17β-E2 5′-GCTTCCAGCTTATTGAATTACACGCAGAGGGTAGCGGCTCTGCGCATTCAATTGCTGCGCGCTGAAGCGCGGAAGC-3′ 1.5–50 nM 1.5 nM [30]
AFB1 5′-biotin-GTT GGG CAC GTG TTG TCT CTC TGT GTC TCG TGC CCT TCG CTA GGC CCA CA-3′ ND 0.1 ng/mL [31]
PSA 5′-Biotin-ATTAAAGCTCGCCATCAAATAGC-3′ 0–2.1 ng/mL 0.15 ng/mL [32]
E.coli O157: H7 5′-ATCCGTCACACCTGCTCTGTCTGCGAGCGGGGCG 500–5 × 107 CFU/mL 250 CFU/mL [33]
CGGGCCCGGCGGGGGATGCGTGGTGTTGGCTCCCGTAT-3′
Fluorometric T-2 5′-CAGCTCAGAAGCTTGATCCTGTATATCAAGCATCGCGTGTTTACACATGCGAGAGGTGAAGACTCGAAGTCGTGCATCTG-3′ 0.001−100 ng/mL 0.57 pg/mL [34]
DGX 5′-AGCGAGGGCGGTGTCCAACAGCGGTTTTTTCACGAGGAGGTTGGCGGTGG-3′ 0.001 to 0.5 ng/mL 0.0032 ng/mL [35]
ZEN 5′-NH2-AGCAGCACAGAGGTCAGATGTCATCTATCTATGGTACATTACTATCTGTAATGTGATATGCCTATGCGTGCTACCGTGAA-3′ 31.4–628 nM 7.5 nM [36]
PAT 5′-GGC CCG CCA ACC CGC ATC ATC TAC ACT GAT ATT TTA CCT T-3′CFL 5–300 ng/mL 0.13 ng/mL [37]
AFB1 TARMA-5′-GTT GGG CAC GTG TTG TCT CTC TGT GTC TCG TGC CCT TCG CTA GGC CCA CA-3′ 0–180 ng/mL 0.35 ng/mL [38]
AMP 5′-CACGGCATGGTGGGCGTCGTG-Thiol-3′ 100–1000 pM 29.2 pM [39]
IFN-γ Apt1: 5′-H2N-C6-CCGCCCAAATCCCTAAGAGAAGACTGTAATGAC ATCAAACCAGACACACACTACACACGCA-3′ 2.0 × 10−18–5.0 × 10−8 M 0.178 fM [40]
Apt2: 5′-TGGGGTTGGTTGTGTTGGGTGTTGTG-Azide(N3)-3′
MUC1 5′-Cy3-GCAGTTGATCCTTTGGATACCCTGG-NH2-3′ 0–50 nM 0.8 nM [41]
Isocarbophos 5′-AGCT2GCTGCAGCGAT2CT2GATCGC2ACAGAGCT-3’ 10–500 nM 3.38 nM [42]
Hg2+ 5′-FAM-TTC TTT CTT CCC CTT GTT TGT T-3′ 20–150 nM 15 nM [43]
E. coli 5′-CCG GAC GCT TAT GCC TTG CCA TCT ACA GAG CAG GTG TGA CGG-C6 NH2-3′ 85 to 85 × 107 CFU/mL 17 CFU/mL [44]
E. coli ATCC8739 5′-ATCCGTCACACCTGCTCTGTCTGCGAGCGGGGCGCGGGCCCGGCGGGGGATGCGTGGTGTTGGCTCCCGTAT-3′ 58–58 × 106 CFU/mL 10 CFU/mL [45]
Malathion 5′-ATCCGTCACACCTGCTCTTATACACAATTGTTTTTCTCTTAACT TCTTGACTGCTGGTGTTGGCTCCCGTAT-3′ of 0.01–1 μM 1.42 nM [46]
Pb2+ Apt1: 5′-Biotin-CGA TCA CTA ACT ATr AGG AAG AGA TG-HS-3′ 25–1400 nM 5.7 nM [47]
Apt2: 5′-NH2-TGA GTG ATA AAG CTG GCC GAG CCT CTT CTC TAC-3′
Chlorpyrifos 5′-CCTGCCACGCTCCGCAAGCTTAGGGTTACGCCTGCAGCGATTCTTGATCGCGCTGCTGGTAATCCTTCTTTAAGCTTGGCACCCGCATCGT-3′ 5–600 nM 3.8 nM [48]
ATP 5′-CCCCAACTCCTTCCCGAAACCTACCTGGGGGAGTATTGCGGAGGAAGGTTTCGGG-3′ 20–220 μM 0.38 μM [49]
ATP 5′-CCCCCCCCCCCCCACCTGGGGGAGTATTGCGGAGGAAGGT-3′ 50 pM–1.0 nM 26 pM [50]
AFB1 5′-GTT GGG CAC GTG TTG TCT CTC TGT GTC TCG TGC CCT TCG CTA GGC CCA CA-3′ 2–400 ng/mL 1.82 ng/mL [51]
Acetamiprid 5′-TGT AAT TTG TCT GCA GCG GTT CTT GAT CGC TGA CAC CAT ATT ATG AAG A-3′ 5 nM–1.2 μM 3 nM [52]
Exosomes 5′-CATCCATGGGAATTCGTCGACCCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTTTCCCTATAGTGAGTCGTATTACTGCCTAGGCTCGAGCTCG-3′ 0.68–30.4 pM 0.57 pM [36]
ATP 5′-FAM-AATTCTGGGGGAGCCTTTTGT GGG TAGGGC GGG TTG GTT TTG CCC CGG AGG AGG AATT-BHQ1-3′ 1−500,000 μM ND [53]
Cd2+ 5′-AGTGACGTGCTGGACTCCGGACTATTGTGGTATGATCTGGTTGTGACTATGCAGTGCGTGCA-(CH2)3-SH-3′ 20 pM–12 nM 1.2 pM [54]
MC-LR 5′-GGC GCC AAA CAG GAC CAC CAT GAC AAT TAC CCA TAC CAC CTC ATT ATG CCC CAT CTC CGC-3′ 0.01 to 1000 μg/L 4.8 ng/L [55]
Chloramphenicol 5′-AGCAGCACAGAGGTCAGATGACTTCAGTGAGTTGTCCCACGGTCGGCGAGTCGGTGGTAGCCTATGCGTGCTACCGTGAA-3′ 10–107 pg/mL 0.987 pg/mL [56]
Electrochemical OTA 5′-triple SH-GAT CGG GTG TGG GTG GCG TAA AGG GAG CAT CGG ACA-3′ 1 × 10−5–10 nM 3.3 × 10−3 pM [57]
Amoxicillin 5′-(SH)-TTA GTT GGG GTT CAG TTG G-3′ 0.5–3 nM 0.2 nM [58]
Thrombin Apt1: 5′-COOH-(CH2)10-GGTTGGTGTGGTTGG-3′. 1 pM–10 nM 0.64 pM [59]
Apt2: 5′-NH2-(CH2)6-AGTCCGTGGTAGGGCAGGTTGGGGTGACT-3′
PSA 5′-NH2-TTT TTA ATT AAA GCT CGC CAT CAA ATA GCT TT-3′ 0.0001–100 ng/mL 0.085 pg/mL [60]
OTC 5′-SH-GGA ATT CGC TAG CAC GTT GAC GCT GGT GCC CGG TTG TGG TGC GAG TGT TGT GTG GAT CCG AGC TCC ACG TG-3′ 1 × 10−13 to 1 × 10−5 g/mL 3.1 × 10−14 g/mL [61]
PAT 5′-NH2-GGCCCGCCAACCCGCATCATCTACACTGATATTTTACCTT-3′ 5 × 10−8–5 × 10−1 μg/ 1.46 × 10−8 μg/mL [62]
Thrombin 5′-AGTCCGTGGTAGGGCAGGTTGGGGTGACT-3′ 1 fM–1 nM 0.57 fM [63]
Pb2+ 5′-GGGTGGGTGGGTGGGT-3′ and its complementary strand 5′-CCACCCACCC–(CH2)6–SH-3′ 0.5–25 ppb 0.6 ppb [64]
H5N1 5′-biotin-GTGTGCATGGATAGCACGTAACGGTGTAGTAGTAACGTGCGGGTAGGAAGAAAGGGAAATAGTTGTCGTGTTG-3′ 0.001 to 1 HAU 8 × 10–4 HAU [65]
Sulfadimethoxine 5′-GAG GGC AAC GAG TGT TTA TAG A-3′, DNA probe, 5′–SH–TCT ATA AAC ACT CGT TGC CCT C-3′ 0.1–500 nM 0.038 nM [66]
Malathion 5′-COOH-ATCCGTCACACCTGCTCTTATACACAATTGTTTTTCTCTT AACTTCTTGACTGCTGGTGTTGGCT-3′ 0.5–600 ng/L 0.5 ng/L [67]
ATZ 5′-TGT-ACC-GTC-TGA-GCG-ATT-CGT-ACG-AAC-GGC-TTT-GTA-CTG-TTT-GCA-CTG-GCG-GAT-TTA-GCC-AGT-CAG-TGT-TAA-GGA-GTG-C-3′ 50-fM–0.3 nM 12.0 fM [68]
OTA 5′-AAAGATCGGGTGTGGGTGGCGTAA AGGGAGCATCGGACA-3′ 0.01–1 ng/mL 0.004 ng/mL [69]

Biomarker detection based on aptamer functionalization still needs to overcome these limitations in order to be available for the multi-detection of metal ions, DNA, and proteins. Furthermore, the development of more specific aptamers is still needed, as is also integration into sensor platforms. Aptasensor platforms need more attention regarding (1) simultaneous multiple marker detection; (2) the long-term stability of biosensor assays; (3) direct assays in real sample matrixes; (4) understanding the nature of the binding competition between an aptamer and target on the surface of a nanomaterial, which could affect the sensor reliability; (5) more focus on the future development of in vivo aptamer sensing technology, the possible problems, and their solutions; and (6) more intensive research regarding the improvement of the POCT of biomarkers using aptasensors. The aforementioned hurdles need to be overcome quickly for the achievement of a reliable and selective detection of markers with ultrasensitivity, with affordable and portable on-site analytical devices. We are sure that the scientific community has the talent to offer solutions to these hurdles in order to design an affordable, easy-to-use nanomaterial-based electro-optical aptasensor integrated with rolling-cycle amplification technology.

References

  1. Pehlivan, Z.S.; Torabfam, M.; Kurt, H.; Ow-Yang, C.; Hildebrandt, N.; Yüce, M. Aptamer and nanomaterial based FRET biosensors: A review on recent advances (2014–2019). Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 563.
  2. Şahin, S.; Caglayan, M.O.; Üstundağ, Z. A review on nanostructure-based mercury (II) detection and monitoring focusing on aptamer and oligonucleotide biosensors. Talanta 2020, 220, 121437.
  3. Li, F.; Pei, H.; Wang, L.; Lu, J.; Gao, J.; Jiang, B.; Zhao, X.; Fan, C. Nanomaterial-Based Fluorescent DNA Analysis: A Comparative Study of the Quenching Effects of Graphene Oxide, Carbon Nanotubes, and Gold Nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 4140–4148.
  4. Chen, L.; Lee, S.; Lee, M.; Lim, C.; Choo, J.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Joo, S.-W.; Lee, K.-H.; Choi, Y.-W. DNA hybridization detection in a microfluidic channel using two fluorescently labelled nucleic acid probes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 23, 1878–1882.
  5. Shi, J.; Tian, F.; Lyu, J.; Yang, M. Nanoparticle based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) for biosensing applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 6989–7005.
  6. Wang, L.; Zhu, F.; Chen, M.; Zhu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Yang, H.; Chen, X. Rapid and visual detection of aflatoxin B1 in foodstuffs using aptamer/G-quadruplex DNAzyme probe with low background noise. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 581–587.
  7. Mansouri-Majd, S.; Ghasemi, F.; Salimi, A.; Sham, T. Transport Properties of a Molybdenum Disulfide and Carbon Dot Nanohybrid Transistor and Its Applications as a Hg2+ Aptasensor. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 635–645.
  8. Zhao, Y.; Cui, L.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, F.; Ke, W. Ag/CdO NP-Engineered Magnetic Electrochemical Aptasensor for Prostatic Specific Antigen Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 11, 3474–3481.
  9. Adegokea, O.; Pereira-Barros, M.A.; Zolotovskaya, S.; Abdolvand, A.; Nic Daeid, N. Aptamer-based cocaine assay using a nanohybrid composed of ZnS/Ag2Se quantum dots, graphene oxide and gold nanoparticles as a fluorescent probe. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 104–112.
  10. Li, J.; Liu, L.; Ai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Liang, Q. Self-Polymerized Dopamine-Decorated Au NPs and Coordinated with Fe-MOF as a Dual Binding Sites and Dual Signal-Amplifying Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Detection of CEA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 5500–5510.
  11. Cao, R.; Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Naked-eye sensitive detection of nuclease activity using positively-charged gold nanoparticles as colorimetric probes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12301–12303.
  12. Bian, X.; Song, Z.-L.; Qian, Y.; Gao, W.; Cheng, Z.-Q.; Chen, L.; Liang, H.; Ding, D.; Nie, X.-K.; Chen, Z.; et al. Fabrication of Graphene-isolated-Au-nanocrystal Nanostructures for Multimodal Cell Imaging and Photothermal-enhanced Chemotherapy. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6093.
  13. Qi, Y.; Ma, J.; Chen, X.; Xiu, F.-R.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y. Practical aptamer-based assay of heavy metal mercury ion in contaminated environmental samples: Convenience and sensitivity. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 412, 439–448.
  14. Gupta, R.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Pinnaka, A.K.; Singhal, N.K. Naked eye colorimetric detection of Escherichia coli using aptamer conjugated graphene oxide enclosed Gold nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129100.
  15. Lai, X.; Zhang, S.; Du, G.; Wang, Y.; Han, Y.; Ye, N.; Xiang, Y. Ultrasensitive Determination of Malathion in Apples by Aptamer-Based Resonance Scattering. Anal. Lett. 2020, 1–15.
  16. Xu, L.; Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ren, S.; Wu, J.; Zhou, H.; Gao, Z. Highly Selective, Aptamer-Based, Ultrasensitive Nanogold Colorimetric Smartphone Readout for Detection of Cd (II). Molecules 2019, 24, 2745.
  17. Chen, S.; Yang, X.; Fu, S.; Qin, X.; Yang, T.; Man, C.; Jiang, Y. A novel AuNPs colorimetric sensor for sensitively detecting viable Salmonella typhimurium based on dual aptamers. Food Control 2020, 115, 107281.
  18. Yi, J.; Wu, P.; Li, G.; Xiao, W.; Li, L.; He, Y.; He, Y.; Ding, P.; Chen, C. A composite prepared from carboxymethyl chitosan and aptamer-modified gold nanoparticles for the colorimetric determination of Salmonella typhimurium. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 711.
  19. Jalalian, S.H.; Lavaee, P.; Ramezani, M.; Danesh, N.M.; Alibolandi, M.; Abnous, K.; Taghdisi, S.M. An optical aptasensor for aflatoxin M1 detection based on target-induced protection of gold nanoparticles against salt-induced aggregation and silica nanoparticles. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 246, 119062.
  20. Lerdsri, J.; Chananchana, W.; Upan, J.; Sridara, T.; Jakmunee, J. Label-free colorimetric aptasensor for rapid detection of aflatoxin B1 by utilizing cationic perylene probe and localized surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128356.
  21. Chen, Q.; Gao, R.; Jia, L. Enhancement of the peroxidase-like activity of aptamers modified gold nanoclusters by bacteria for colorimetric detection of Salmonella typhimurium. Talanta 2021, 221, 121476.
  22. Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, W.; Birech, Z.; Ma, L.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Shang, J.; Hu, J. A multi-channel localized surface plasmon resonance system for absorptiometric determination of abscisic acid by using gold nanoparticles functionalized with a polyadenine-tailed aptamer. Microchim. Acta 2019, 187, 20.
  23. Jo, S.; Lee, W.; Park, J.; Kim, W.; Kim, W.; Lee, G.; Hong, J.; Park, J. Localized surface plasmon resonance aptasensor for the highly sensitive direct detection of cortisol in human saliva. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 304, 127424.
  24. Lee, W.; Shaban, S.M.; Pyun, D.G.; Kim, Y.-J. Solid-phase colorimetric apta-biosensor for thrombin detection. Thin Solid Films 2019, 686, 137428.
  25. Tao, Z.; Wei, L.; Wu, S.; Duan, N.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. A colorimetric aptamer-based method for detection of cadmium using the enhanced peroxidase-like activity of Au–MoS2 nanocomposites. Anal. Biochem. 2020, 608, 113844.
  26. Miao, X.; Zhu, Z.; Jia, H.; Lu, C.; Liu, X.; Mao, D.; Chen, G. Colorimetric detection of cancer biomarker based on enzyme enrichment and pH sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128435.
  27. Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Yu, X.; Wan, Y.; Yin, M.; Zhang, W.; Cao, B.; Wang, H. Fe3O4 Nanozymes with Aptamer-Tuned Catalysis for Selective Colorimetric Analysis of ATP in Blood. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 14737–14742.
  28. Tao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Duan, N.; Wang, Z. A Colorimetric Aptamer Sensor Based on the Enhanced Peroxidase Activity of Functionalized Graphene/Fe3O4-AuNPs for Detection of Lead (II) Ions. Catalysts 2020, 10, 600.
  29. Duan, N.; Yang, W.; Wu, S.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Z. A Visual and Sensitive Detection of Escherichia coli Based on Aptamer and Peroxidase-like Mimics of Copper-Metal Organic Framework Nanoparticles. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1433–1441.
  30. Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Gopinath, S.C.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, Y. Aptamer–17β-estradiol–antibody sandwich ELISA for determination of gynecological endocrine function. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2020.
  31. Xing, K.-Y.; Peng, J.; Shan, S.; Liu, D.-F.; Huang, Y.-N.; Lai, W. Green Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Based on the Single-Stranded Binding Protein-Assisted Aptamer for the Detection of Mycotoxin. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 8422–8426.
  32. Wei, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Sui, J.; Xu, Z.-R. Multicolor and photothermal dual-readout biosensor for visual detection of prostate specific antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 140, 111345.
  33. Li, T.; Ou, G.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Hu, R.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, M. Naked-eye based point-of-care detection of E.coli O157: H7 by a signal-amplified microfluidic aptasensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1130, 20–28.
  34. Khan, I.M.; Niazi, S.; Yu, Y.; Pasha, I.; Yue, L.; Mohsin, A.; Shoaib, M.; Iqbal, M.W.; Khaliq, A.; Wang, Z. Fabrication of PAA coated green-emitting AuNCs for construction of label-free FRET assembly for specific recognition of T-2 toxin. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 321, 128470.
  35. Shirani, M.; Kalantari, H.; Khodayar, M.J.; Kouchak, M.; Rahbar, N. A novel strategy for detection of small molecules based on aptamer/gold nanoparticles/graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as fluorescent biosensor. Talanta 2020, 219, 121235.
  36. Tan, X.; Wang, X.; Hao, A.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Chu, T.; Jiang, M.; Yang, Y.; Ming, D. Aptamer-based ratiometric fluorescent nanoprobe for specific and visual detection of zearalenone. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 104943.
  37. Khan, R.; Sherazi, T.A.; Catanante, G.; Rasheed, S.; Marty, J.L.; Hayat, A. Switchable fluorescence sensor toward PAT via CA-MWCNTs quenched aptamer-tagged carboxyfluorescein. Food Chem. 2020, 312, 126048.
  38. Jia, Y.; Zhou, G.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Yu, B.; Zhang, J. A metal-organic framework/aptamer system as a fluorescent biosensor for determination of aflatoxin B1 in food samples. Talanta 2020, 219, 121342.
  39. Esmaelpourfarkhani, M.; Abnous, K.; Taghdisi, S.M.; Chamsaz, M. A novel turn-off fluorescent aptasensor for ampicillin detection based on perylenetetracarboxylic acid diimide and gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 164, 112329.
  40. Wen, D.; Liu, Q.; Li, L.; Yang, H.; Kong, J. Ultrasensitive aptamer fluorometric detection of IFN-γ by dual atom transfer radical polymerization amplification. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 295, 40–48.
  41. Wang, D.-E.; Gao, X.; You, S.; Chen, M.; Ren, L.; Sun, W.; Yang, H.; Xu, H. Aptamer-functionalized polydiacetylene liposomes act as a fluorescent sensor for sensitive detection of MUC1 and targeted imaging of cancer cells. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309, 127778.
  42. Fan, K.; Yang, R.; Zhao, Y.; Zang, C.; Miao, X.; Qu, B.; Lu, L. A fluorescent aptasensor for sensitive detection of isocarbophos based on AT-rich three-way junctions DNA templated copper nanoparticles and Fe3O4@GO. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 321, 128515.
  43. Wang, S.-E.; Si, S. Aptamer biosensing platform based on carbon nanotube long-range energy transfer for sensitive, selective and multicolor fluorescent heavy metal ion analysis. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 2947–2953.
  44. Wang, P.; Wang, A.; Hassan, M.; Ouyang, Q.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. A highly sensitive upconversion nanoparticles-WS2 nanosheet sensing platform for Escherichia coli detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128434.
  45. Li, H.; Ahmad, W.; Rong, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zuo, M.; Ouyang, Q.; Guo, Z. Designing an aptamer based magnetic and upconversion nanoparticles conjugated fluorescence sensor for screening Escherichia coli in food. Food Control 2020, 107, 106761.
  46. Chen, Q.; Sheng, R.; Wang, P.; Ouyang, Q.; Wang, A.; Ali, S.; Zareef, M.; Hassan, M. Ultra-sensitive detection of malathion residues using FRET-based upconversion fluorescence sensor in food. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 241, 118654.
  47. Chen, M.; Hassan, M.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. Fluorometric determination of lead (II) by using aptamer-functionalized upconversion nanoparticles and magnetite-modified gold nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 85.
  48. Liu, Q.; Wang, H.; Han, P.; Feng, X. Fluorescent aptasensing of chlorpyrifos based on the assembly of cationic conjugated polymer-aggregated gold nanoparticles and luminescent metal–organic frameworks. Analyst 2019, 144, 6025–6032.
  49. Qiu, Q.; Gao, R.-R.; Xie, A.; Jiao, Y.; Dong, W. A ratiometric fluorescent sensor with different DNA-templated Ag NCs as signals for ATP detection. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 400, 112725.
  50. Xue, N.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Miao, X. Ultrasensitive and label-free detection of ATP by using gold nanorods coupled with enzyme assisted target recycling amplification. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1104, 117–124.
  51. Guo, Z.; Lv, L.; Cui, C.; Wang, Y.; Ji, S.; Fang, J.; Yuan, M.; Yu, H. Detection of aflatoxin B1 with a new label-free fluorescent aptasensor based on exonuclease I and SYBR Gold. Anal. Methods 2020, 12, 2928–2933.
  52. Lu, X.; Fan, Z. RecJf exonuclease-assisted fluorescent self-assembly aptasensor for supersensitive detection of pesticides in food. J. Lumin. 2020, 226, 117469.
  53. Kang, B.; Park, S.V.; Soh, H.T.; Oh, S.S. A Dual-Sensing DNA Nanostructure with an Ultrabroad Detection Range. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2802–2808.
  54. Li, S.; Ma, X.; Pang, C.; Tian, H.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Lv, D.; Ge, H. Fluorometric aptasensor for cadmium (II) by using an aptamer-imprinted polymer as the recognition element. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 823.
  55. Zhang, Y.; Lai, Y.; Teng, X.; Pu, S.; Yang, Z.; Pang, P.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Yang, W.; Barrow, C.J. Facile fluorescence strategy for sensitive detection of microcystin-LR based on dsDNA-templated copper nanoclusters. Anal. Methods 2020, 12, 1752–1758.
  56. Sharma, R.; Akshath, U.S.; Bhatt, P.; Raghavarao, K.S.M.S. Fluorescent aptaswitch for chloramphenicol detection—Quantification enabled by immobilization of aptamer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 290, 110–117.
  57. Yang, Y.-J.; Zhou, Y.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, G.-M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.-H.; Lei, P.; Dong, C.; Deng, X.; He, Y.; et al. A Label-free aptasensor based on Aptamer/NH2 Janus particles for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Ochratoxin A. Talanta 2019, 199, 310–316.
  58. Song, J.; Huang, M.; Jiang, N.; Zheng, S.; Mu, T.; Meng, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, G. Ultrasensitive detection of amoxicillin by TiO2-g-C3N4@AuNPs impedimetric aptasensor: Fabrication, optimization, and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122024.
  59. Wang, X.; Gao, F.; Gong, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, C. Electrochemical aptasensor based on conductive supramolecular polymer hydrogels for thrombin detection with high selectivity. Talanta 2019, 205, 120140.
  60. Shu, Y.; Ma, W.; Ji, W.; Wei, H.; Mao, L. Aptamer superstructure-based electrochemical biosensor for sensitive detection of ATP in rat brain with in vivo microdialysis. Analyst 2019, 144, 1711–1717.
  61. He, B.; Wang, L.; Dong, X.; Yan, X.; Li, M.; Yan, S.; Yan, D. Aptamer-based thin film gold electrode modified with gold nanoparticles and carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for detecting oxytetracycline in chicken samples. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125179.
  62. He, B.; Dong, X. Hierarchically porous Zr-MOFs labelled methylene blue as signal tags for electrochemical patulin aptasensor based on ZnO nano flower. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 294, 192–198.
  63. Ren, Q.; Mou, J.; Guo, Y.; Wang, H.; Cao, X.; Zhang, F.; Xia, J.; Wang, Z. Simple homogeneous electrochemical target-responsive aptasensor based on aptamer bio-gated and porous carbon nanocontainer derived from ZIF-8. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 166, 112448.
  64. Ding, J.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Y.; Yu, M.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, P. An electrochemical aptasensor for detection of lead ions using a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with Au/polypyrrole composites and toluidine blue. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 4274–4279.
  65. Fu, Y.; Callaway, Z.; Lum, J.; Wang, R.; Lin, J.; Li, Y. Exploiting Enzyme Catalysis in Ultra-Low Ion Strength Media for Impedance Biosensing of Avian Influenza Virus Using a Bare Interdigitated Electrode. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1965–1971.
  66. Bai, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, F.; Yin, H.; Yin, H.; Ai, S. Electrochemical aptasensor for sulfadimethoxine detection based on the triggered cleavage activity of nuclease P1 by aptamer-target complex. Talanta 2019, 204, 409–414.
  67. Xu, G.; Hou, J.; Zhao, Y.; Bao, J.; Yang, M.; Fa, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Huo, D.; Hou, C. Dual-signal aptamer sensor based on polydopamine-gold nanoparticles and exonuclease I for ultrasensitive malathion detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 287, 428–436.
  68. Sun, C.; Liu, M.; Sun, H.; Lu, H.; Liu, M. Immobilization-free photoelectrochemical aptasensor for environmental pollutants: Design, fabrication and mechanism. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 140, 111352.
  69. Tan, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Qiu, B.; Guo, L.; Lin, Z.; Yang, H.-H. Exonuclease-Catalyzed Target Recycling Amplification and Immobilization-free Electrochemical Aptasensor. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 11826–11831.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Biomedical
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
samy shaban
View Times: 651
Entry Collection: Chemical Bond
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 17 Jun 2021
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback