Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Polyethylene Composites

    Subjects: Polymer Science
    View times: 19
    Submitted by: Erfan Rezvani Ghomi

    Definition

    Polyethylene (PE) is one the most used plastics worldwide for a wide range of applications due to its good mechanical and chemical resistance, low density, cost efficiency, ease of processability, non-reactivity, low toxicity, good electric insulation, and good functionality.

    1. Introduction

    In recent times, polymers have been used in a wide range of industrial applications, such as packaging, electronics, and construction [1][2]. To better the performance of the aforementioned applications, polymers need to be more environmentally friendly, safe, and durable [3]. The utilization of polymers is encouraged due to good functionality, acceptable durability, and cost-efficiency; however, high flammability, and poor thermal properties are noticeable limitations for their applicability [4]. Most polymers are flammable and, by exposure to enough energy, they will leave a considerable amount of smoke and heat [5]. It is reported that annually about 5000 people in Europe and 4000 people in the United States are killed by fires. Furthermore, the economic loss of these fire accidents is estimated to be about 0.3% of the GDP [6]. Following the analysis conducted by the Geneva-based Aircraft Crashes Record Office (ACRO), it is possible to reduce the possibility of fire catastrophes and their subsequent fatalities by reducing the flammability of polymeric materials [6]. Therefore, related to the use of polymers, there are environmental, economic, and health issues that are considered as the driving forces to motivate the conduction of research and different studies on the flammability of polymers [7].

    Polyolefins are a group of the most popular polymers in various applications [8]. One of the main polymers of this group is PE, with more than 100 million tons production per year, that is, 34% of the total plastic market, and is extensively used due to good mechanical and chemical resistance, low density, cost efficiency, ease of processability, non-reactivity, low toxicity, good electric insulation, and good functionality [9]. However, like other polymers, the concern about PE is its flammability in applications requiring good flame retardancy. Although the emissions from PE have low toxicity, it has a low limiting oxygen index (LOI) and drips during burning, which causes rapid flame spread [10].

    Typically, physical or chemical modifications, as well as applying FRs, are recommended to reduce the flammability of PE products [11]. Flame retardancy of polymers increases by incorporation of FRs and is estimated to triplicate their survival time in case of fire [12]. FRs are necessary as they enhance the flammability of polymeric materials by delaying the fire and its spread [13]. The common commercial FRs used for PE systems are based on phosphorus, borate, inorganic hydroxides, silicon, and nitrogen and are introduced to polymer matrixes during processing [14]. Each of the FR approaches uses a different mechanism and their application is attributed to the polymer matrix and the intended usage. For example, regarding the inorganic hydroxides, they will reduce the burning rate by releasing water to decrease the temperature since decomposition occurs at higher temperatures. Although gas-phase reactions are important in controlling flames in PE systems, quenching FRs based on halogens are not recommended due to environmental concerns [15]. Moreover, intumescent flame retardants (IFRs) are of great importance and efficiency in restricting the fire by forming a swollen char and are applicable for polymeric materials [16]. Considering the high production and applicability of PE, the issue of its flammability is of great importance and hence, there is an urgent need to develop strategies that minimize the flammability of PE.

    2. PE Grades and Properties

    PEs are one of the most potential materials of value-adding in the case of accurate formulation modifications [17]. It is of great importance to know the grades of PE as their flame performance is correlated with their chemical structure (i.e., branching type) and FR formulations [17]. The structure and properties of PE main grades, including density, crystallinity, LOI, thermal conductivity, melting temperature, and molecular weight are summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1. Different properties of PE’s grades [18][19][20].

    PE Grades Structure’s Description Density (g/cm−3) Crystallinity LOI (%) Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) Melt Temperature (°C) Mw (g/mol)
    LDPE
    (Low-density PE)
    Branched structure containing long and short chains 0.915–0.932 Lower degree of crystallinity 17–18 0.32–0.35 105–115 <50,000
    LLDPE
    (Linear low-density PE)
    Branched structure containing short chains 0.910–0.930 Slightly higher than LDPE 17–18 0.35–0.45 120–130 <50,000
    HDPE
    (High-density PE)
    Linear structure 0.940–0.970 Higher degree of crystallinity 17–18 0.45–0.5 128–136 Up to 200,000

    The entry is from 10.3390/molecules25215157

    References

    1. Khanal, S.; Lu, Y.; Ahmed, S.; Ali, M.; Xu, S. Synergistic effect of zeolite 4A on thermal, mechanical and flame retardant properties of intumescent flame retardant HDPE composites. Polymer Testing 2020, 81, 106177, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106177.
    2. Das, O.; Capezza, J.A.; Mårtensson, J.; Dong, Y.; Neisiany, E.R.; Pelcastre, L.; Jiang, L.; Xu, Q.; Olsson, T.R.; Hedenqvist, S.M. The Effect of Carbon Black on the Properties of Plasticised Wheat Gluten Biopolymer. Molecules 2020, 25, 2279, doi:10.3390/molecules25102279.
    3. Neisiany, R.E.; Enayati, M.S.; Kazemi-Beydokhti, A.; Das, O.; Ramakrishna, S. Multilayered Bio-Based Electrospun Membranes: A Potential Porous Media for Filtration Applications. Frontiers in Materials 2020, 7, 67, doi:10.3389/fmats.2020.00067.
    4. Salasinska, K.; Mizera, K.; Celiński, M.; Kozikowski, P.; Borucka, M.; Gajek, A. Thermal properties and fire behavior of polyethylene with a mixture of copper phosphate and melamine phosphate as a novel flame retardant. Fire Safety Journal 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103137, 103137, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103137.
    5. Das, O.; Neisiany, R.E.; Capezza, A.J.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Försth, M.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, L.; Ji, D.; Ramakrishna, S. The need for fully bio-based facemasks to counter coronavirus outbreaks: A perspective. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 736, 139611, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139611.
    6. Majka, T.M.; Stachak, P. The studies on the production of polyethylene film with reduced flammability. In Proceedings of The 21st International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry.
    7. Babu, K.; Rendén, G.; Afriyie Mensah, R.; Kim, N.K.; Jiang, L.; Xu, Q.; Restás, Á.; Esmaeely Neisiany, R.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Försth, M. A review on the flammability properties of carbon-based polymeric composites: state-of-the-art and future trends. Polymers 2020, 12, 1518.
    8. Lai, X.; Tang, S.; Li, H.; Zeng, X. Flame-retardant mechanism of a novel polymeric intumescent flame retardant containing caged bicyclic phosphate for polypropylene. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2015, 113, 22-31, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.009.
    9. Wang, D.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Artiles, C.P.; Hull, T.R.; Price, D. Fire retardancy of a reactively extruded intumescent flame retardant polyethylene system enhanced by metal chelates. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2007, 92, 1592-1598, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.04.015.
    10. Liu, Y.; Wang, D.-Y.; Wang, J.-S.; Song, Y.-P.; Wang, Y.-Z. A novel intumescent flame-retardant LDPE system and its thermo-oxidative degradation and flame-retardant mechanisms. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 2008, 19, 1566-1575, doi:10.1002/pat.1171.
    11. Xu, W.; Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, G.; Ding, D. The flame retardancy and smoke suppression effect of a hybrid containing CuMoO4 modified reduced graphene oxide/layered double hydroxide on epoxy resin. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2018, 343, 364-375, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.057.
    12. Majlingova, A.; Kačíková, D.; Xu, Q.; Jin, C. Current trends in flame-retardant treatment of selected polymers – a review; Technical University in Zvolen, Slovak Republic, 2018.
    13. Lim, K.-S.; Bee, S.-T.; Sin, L.T.; Tee, T.-T.; Ratnam, C.T.; Hui, D.; Rahmat, A.R. A review of application of ammonium polyphosphate as intumescent flame retardant in thermoplastic composites. Composites Part B: Engineering 2016, 84, 155-174, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.066.
    14. Gao, H.; Hu, S.; Han, H.; Zhang, J. Effect of different metallic hydroxides on flame-retardant properties of low density polyethylene/melamine polyphosphate/starch composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2011, 122, 3263-3269, doi:10.1002/app.34398.
    15. Camino, G.; Grassie, N.; McNeill, I.C. Influence of the fire retardant, ammonium polyphosphate, on the thermal degradation of poly(methyl methacrylate). Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition 1978, 16, 95-106, doi:10.1002/pol.1978.170160110.
    16. Dasari, A.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Cai, G.-P.; Mai, Y.-W. Recent developments in the fire retardancy of polymeric materials. Progress in Polymer Science 2013, 38, 1357-1387, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.006.
    17. Luyt, A.S.; Malik, S.S.; Gasmi, S.A.; Porfyris, A.; Andronopoulou, A.; Korres, D.; Vouyiouka, S.; Grosshauser, M.; Pfaendner, R.; Brüll, R. Halogen-free flame-retardant compounds. Thermal decomposition and flammability behavior for alternative polyethylene grades. Polymers 2019, 11, 1479.
    18. Kurtz, S.M. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook: ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement and medical devices; Academic Press, Oxford, UK: 2009.
    19. Hench, L.; Jones, J. Biomaterials, artificial organs and tissue engineering; Elsevier, Abington, USA: 2005.
    20. Li, D.; Zhou, L.; Wang, X.; He, L.; Yang, X. Effect of Crystallinity of Polyethylene with Different Densities on Breakdown Strength and Conductance Property. Materials 2019, 12, doi:10.3390/ma12111746.
    21. Sun, D.-x.; Yang, C.-j.; Qi, X.-d.; Yang, J.-h.; Wang, Y. Largely enhanced fracture toughness of the PP/EPDM blends induced by adding carbon nanofibers. Composites Science and Technology 2018, 164, 146-152.
    22. Rezvani Ghomi, E.; Esmaeely Neisiany, R.; Nouri Khorasani, S.; Dinari, M.; Ataei, S.; Koochaki, M.S.; Ramakrishna, S. Development of an epoxy self-healing coating through the incorporation of acrylic acid-co-acrylamide copolymeric gel. Progress in Organic Coatings 2020, 149, 105948, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105948.
    23. Kashiwagi, T.; Du, F.; Douglas, J.F.; Winey, K.I.; Harris, R.H.; Shields, J.R. Nanoparticle networks reduce the flammability of polymer nanocomposites. Nature materials 2005, 4, 928-933.
    24. Peeterbroeck, S.; Laoutid, F.; Taulemesse, J.M.; Monteverde, F.; Lopez‐Cuesta, J.M.; Nagy, J.B.; Alexandre, M.; Dubois, P. Mechanical properties and flame‐retardant behavior of ethylene vinyl acetate/high‐density polyethylene coated carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Advanced Functional Materials 2007, 17, 2787-2791.
    25. Cai, G.; Dasari, A.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Du, X.; Dai, S.; Mai, Y.-W.; Wang, J. Fire response of polyamide 6 with layered and fibrillar nanofillers. Polymer degradation and stability 2010, 95, 845-851.
    26. Dasari, A.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Mai, Y.-W.; Cai, G.; Song, H. Roles of graphite oxide, clay and POSS during the combustion of polyamide 6. Polymer 2009, 50, 1577-1587.
    27. Liu, S.; Fang, Z.; Yan, H.; Chevali, V.S.; Wang, H. Synergistic flame retardancy effect of graphene nanosheets and traditional retardants on epoxy resin. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2016, 89, 26-32.
    28. Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Williams, G.R.; O’Hare, D.; Wang, Q. Layered double hydroxide-oxidized carbon nanotube hybrids as highly efficient flame retardant nanofillers for polypropylene. Scientific reports 2016, 6, 35502.
    29. Huang, G.; Chen, S.; Song, P.; Lu, P.; Wu, C.; Liang, H. Combination effects of graphene and layered double hydroxides on intumescent flame-retardant poly (methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites. Applied Clay Science 2014, 88, 78-85.
    30. Szustakiewicz, K.; Cichy, B.; Gazińska, M.; Pigłowski, J. Comparative study on flame, thermal, and mechanical properties of HDPE/clay nanocomposites with MPP or APP. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 2013, 32, 1005-1017.
    31. Chuang, T.-H.; Guo, W.; Cheng, K.-C.; Chen, S.-W.; Wang, H.-T.; Yen, Y.-Y. Thermal properties and flammability of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer/montmorillonite/polyethylene nanocomposites with flame retardants. Journal of Polymer Research 2004, 11, 169-174.
    32. Yu, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Tang, T. Combination of carbon nanotubes with Ni2O3 for simultaneously improving the flame retardancy and mechanical properties of polyethylene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2009, 113, 13092-13097.
    33. Han, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dong, W.; Wang, P. Enhanced fire retardancy of polyethylene/alumina trihydrate composites by graphene nanoplatelets. Materials Letters 2014, 128, 275-278.
    34. Visakh, P.; Yoshihiko, A. Flame retardants: Polymer blends, composites and nanocomposites; Springer Nature, Switzerland AG, Gewerbestr. 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: 2015.
    35. Ajayan, P.M.; Schadler, L.S.; Braun, P.V. Nanocomposite science and technology; John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany: 2006.
    36. Aslzadeh, M.M.; Mir Mohamad Sadeghi, G.; Abdouss, M. Synthesis and characterization of chlorine‐containing flame‐retardant polyurethane nanocomposites via in situ polymerization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2012, 123, 437-447.
    37. Chung, D.D. Composite materials: science and applications; Springer Science & Business Media, Springer-Verlag London, UK: 2010.
    38. Kuila, B.K.; Nandi, A.K. Physical, mechanical, and conductivity properties of poly (3-hexylthiophene)− montmorillonite clay nanocomposites produced by the solvent casting method. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 8577-8584.
    39. Wang, Q.; Dai, J.; Li, W.; Wei, Z.; Jiang, J. The effects of CNT alignment on electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of SWNT/epoxy nanocomposites. Composites science and technology 2008, 68, 1644-1648.
    40. Utracki, L.A.; Wilkie, C.A. Polymer blends handbook; Springer, Netherlands: 2002; Vol. 1.
    41. Tadmor, Z.; Gogos, C.G. Principles of polymer processing; John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: 2013.
    42. Markarian, J. Flame retardants for polyamides-new developments and processing concerns. Plastics, Additives and Compounding 2005, 7, 22-25.
    43. Ghomi, E.R.; Khorasani, S.N.; Kichi, M.K.; Dinari, M.; Ataei, S.; Enayati, M.H.; Koochaki, M.S.; Neisiany, R.E. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2/acrylic acid-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid nanogel composite and investigation its self-healing performance in the epoxy coatings. Colloid and Polymer Science 2020, 298, 213-223, doi:10.1007/s00396-019-04597-0.
    44. Huang, Y.Y.; Terentjev, E.M. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes: mixing, sonication, stabilization, and composite properties. Polymers 2012, 4, 275-295.
    45. Kasaliwal, G.; Villmow, T.; Pegel, S.; Pötschke, P. Influence of material and processing parameters on carbon nanotube dispersion in polymer melts. In Polymer–Carbon Nanotube Composites, Elsevier: 2011; pp. 92-132.
    More