1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Biowastes on Soil Remediation

    Subjects: Engineering, Civil
    View times: 42
    Submitted by: Aneta Kowalska
    (This entry belongs to Entry Collection "Wastewater Treatment ")

    Definition

    Biowastes refer to the biodegradable food residues from private household and food industry, garden industry, municipal wastes, and sewage sludge.

    1. Soil Amendment with Biowaste

    Socioeconomic development is closely related to ecosystem changes. To avoid activities that have harmful effects on the environment, it is necessary to apply methods consistent with the policy of Sustainable Development (SD). Application of biowaste is compatible with the policy of sustainable development, sustainable agriculture, as well as sustainable food production, and it may contribute to the mitigation of climate changes by sequestering carbon in soil [1]. The key aim of SD is to obtain a balance between the exploitation of natural resources for economic development and protecting ecosystem services [2].

    Biowastes are produced in large quantities worldwide by anthropogenic activities, but only about 25% of the total production is recycled. Figure 1 shows the recycling of biowaste per capita in European countries [3]. Due to their high content of organic matter, such biowastes may be used for energy production, soil amendments, and fertilizer, as well as for the immobilization of harmful and toxic trace elements in soils [4]. Biowastes, such as farmyard manure, improve nutrient availability either from the manure itself or through altering the soil’s geochemical properties [5], and it may lead to the improvement of good soil structure. Moreover, biowastes may effectively reduce the lability of harmful cations in soil by complexation or surface adsorption to carboxylic and phenolic acid groups. In addition, the co-precipitation to precipitants such as Fe and Al oxides used in the production provides metal-binding surfactants [6][7][8][9][10][11].

    Figure 1. Recycling of biowaste (kg per capita) in different countries in 2017 provided by Eurostat [12].

    1.1. Sewage Sludge

    Sewage sludge is the most commonly used biowaste in soil remediation practices. Sewage sludge (SS) is a by-product produced in biological wastewater treatment plants and usually makes up about 1–2% of the treated wastewater volume. Production of sewage sludge in 2015 in Poland was 568 Gg, whereas in Germany it was 1.82 Tg [13]. Such large quantities of SS create a problem for their utilization. Moreover, sewage sludge may be problematic in its recycling due to the presence of potentially hazardous trace elements [14]. The substrate of sewage sludge contains both organic and inorganic substances, including pathogens and toxic substances which pose a substantial ecological risk [13]. Sewage sludge also contains organic contaminants that create odors and hygiene concerns [15]. For this reason, sewage treatment systems are designed to stabilize and safely recycle biowaste and to reduce possible environmental risks [12][16]. Applied treatment methods are aimed to recover valuable organic matter fraction and reduction in produced wastes [17].

    The final disposal of sewage sludge consists of a major cost in all treatment processes [15]. That is why over many years the treatment and usage of sewage sludge have changed drastically. At present, sewage sludge may be incinerated, disposed of in landfills, treated in anaerobic digestion and composted, spread on agricultural lands, and used for producing biochar by pyrolysis [18][19]. A share of different disposal methods in total sewage sludge disposal in selected European counties in 2015 is shown in Figure 2. In addition to these disposal methods, sewage sludge may also be recycled as a building material [15].

    Figure 2. Share of different methods of disposal of sewage sludge in total disposal in selected European countries in 2015 [5].

    Sewage sludge has a good fertilizer value due to its high nutrient content made available to plants during the growth period [20]. The sewage sludge is produced in large quantities globally and its amount is increasing year by year. For instance, in Poland, the yearly production of sewage sludge increased by 13% between the years 2006–2015, while in Bulgaria the increase was about 50% between 2006 and 2017. Large quantities of sewage sludge produced in Europe are either deposited or used for different purposes (Figure 2). For example, Germany in 2015 produced 180,299 Mg of sewage sludge, of which 99% was disposed of for agriculture use, landfill, compost, and other application [5].

    1.2. Composts

    Composting refers to the biological process in which organic matter is degraded under controlled aerobic conditions [21]. The product of composting is biologically stabilized material without the consumption and production of phytotoxic metabolites [21]. Different methods are available for composting, including windrows, aerated static piles, bunkers as well as in-vessel systems [22]. A majority of substrates for composting consists of agricultural wastes, agro-industrial wastes, and putrescible organic residues[23] . Composts consist of a uniform structure that is a valuable substrate for agriculture due to its organic origin containing particularly high amounts of phosphorus but also some nitrogen [23][24]. One of the most important advantages of composting when it comes to handling is the reduction in biowaste volume and moisture [25]. The anaerobic digestion of stabilized compost is an interesting treatment pathway, as biogas is produced during the digestion process [26].

    In the literature, there are many interesting studies regarding compost enrichment with nutrients to improve compost quality as a soil amendment. For instance, since nitrogen is one of the most important inorganic nutrients, rice straw or coffee pulp was added to the compost feedstock in order to increase N content in the final product [27][28]. Moreover, potassium-rich feedstock (e.g., banana peels) were added to the compost feedstock to enhance K concentration in the final product [29].

    In addition to ordinary compost, vermicompost, produced by short duration, viable and cost-effective technique with stabilized and oxidized biowaste can also be used. Vermicomposting is carried out both by microorganisms and earthworms [30]. Vermicompost is a peat-like material with a high concentration of organic and inorganic ingredients, and with large surface area, and high porosity. The application of vermicompost is shown to influence soil quality positively, among others, by an increase in organic matter content as well as permeability coefficient (PC) [31].

    1.3. Other Organic Wastes

    In addition to sewage sludge and compost mentioned above, animal manures, crop residues, and food wastes are also considered as biowastes. The name “waste” is closely related to the last step of processing but in agreement with the policy of sustainable development, they may consist a valuable primality product in other branches of industry. Animal manure is often used as organic fertilizer.

    Biowaste from the wood processing industry is frequently combusted to wood ash which is used as a nutrient source in plantations and cultivated fields. The high content of micro- and macronutrients in wood ash makes it a valuable soil quality improver. Due to its alkaline properties, wood ash application results in raising soil pH [32]. It has also been reported that bioash can improve forest nutrient deficiency [33].

    2. Soil Property Changes after Biowastes Amendment

    2.1. Physical and Chemical Soil Parameters

    There are many studies regarding the change in soil properties after land application of organic waste. Land application of sewage sludge decreases the bulk density of the soil and increases its porosity [34][35]. Moreover, it also alters the aggregate associated organic carbon of soil by its significant increase [34]. In a previous study, it was observed that biowaste fertilization can increase the concentration of dissolved organic carbon and phenolic compounds [36]. Sewage sludge application can lead to an increase in the field capacity and wilting point, but they also found a decrease in the available water in the soil [37]. The effect of sewage sludge application on different soil parameters is shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. Changes in soil properties caused by the application of various biowastes.

    The application of compost to soil significantly increased the saturated hydraulic conductivity by up to 168.4% in clay soil [38]. Composts may also increase soil porosity, decrease bulk density, and improve soil chemical quality (pH, CEC, organic matter content) (Table 1) [38]. It was also observed that compost increases electron conductivity, the concentration of dissolved, and total organic carbon, and humic substances [39]. The addition of compost increased the SOC by 1.7 times, K by 5.5 times, and decreased N by 0.7 times in comparison to the control [40].

    2.2. Impact on Biological and Biochemical Parameters

    Basal respiration provides proper information about the microbial activity in the soil and it is a sensitive indicator for monitoring SOM mineralization [41]. García-Gil et al. [41] showed that sewage sludge soil amendment influenced the biological and biochemical parameters of soil positively via increase in microbial biomass, basal respiration, metabolic quotient (qCO2), and enzymatic activities (dehydrogenase, catalase, phosphatase, urease, protease, and β-Glu activity) after 9 months of semiarid soil treatment. Sewage sludge and compost application to soil improved microbial respiration [42][43]. They noticed an increase in CO2 emission at higher doses of sewage sludge (30 Mg ha−1). Moreover, biowaste is a valuable source of nutrients to stimulate microbial activity in the soil [43][44]. Therefore, compost application to the soil altered the structure of the bacterial community [38]. However, some organic wastes used as a soil amendment may contain a high concentration of toxic trace elements creating a huge threat to biocenosis. Thus, their entrance to soil should be carefully monitored to minimize environmental risk [45].

    2.3. Remediation of Degraded Soil Using Biowaste

    Organic wastes such as sewage sludge and compost may immobilize heavy metals in the soil [46][44]. Soil application of biowaste may significantly increase the microbial activity and strengthen the remediation process [47]. Hattab et al. [48] and Placek et al. [47] observed that composted sewage sludge decreased the mobility of Mo, Cr, and Co. Jaskulak et al. [49] showed that cattle manure, horse manure, and vermicompost contributed to the decrease in oxidative stress caused by heavy metal contamination. In their study, the addition of biowaste for the cultivation of white mustard (Sinapis alba), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus) contributed to the decrease in glutathione peroxidase activity and phenolic compounds resulting in a significant decrease in oxidative stress.

    Biowaste may also immobilize polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the soil and consequently reduce their bioavailability [50]. The increased microbial activity fuels the degradation of organic contaminants such as pyrene [51] and PAHs [52].

    Moreno et al. [53] showed that biowastes addition to an arid soil increased and stabilized the dehydrogenase activity indicating higher total metabolic activity of soil microorganisms. Similarly, Meena et al. [54] showed a beneficial role of biowastes soil amendment on microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (up to 1.5 times in comparison to the control) and dehydrogenase activity (up to 2 times higher in comparison to control). It has been reported that the application of poultry manure, straw, alfalfa, and municipal solid waste compost benefited the MBC and dehydrogenase activity in the soil positively [55]. Similar, a positive increase in organic matter and a decrease in bulk density in degraded soils was noticed by Foley and Cooperband [56].

    This entry is adapted from 10.3390/en13215813

    References

    1. Ghimire, R.; Lamichhane, S.; Acharya, B.S.; Bista, P.; Sainju, U.M. Tillage, crop residue, and nutrient management effects on soil organic carbon in rice-based cropping systems: A review. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 1–15, doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(16)61337-0.
    2. Van Der Bliek, J.; McCornick, P.; Clarke, J. On Target for People and Planet: Setting and Achieving Water-Related Sustainable Development Goals. Water Intell. Online 2018, 17, 9781789060010, doi:10.2166/9781789060010.
    3. Sewage Sludge Production and Disposal. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/product?code=env_ww_spd (accessed on 20.May.2019).
    4. Kacprzak, M.; Neczaj, E.; Fijałkowski, K.; Grobelak, A.; Grosser, A.; Worwag, M.; Rorat, A.; Brattebo, H.; Almås, Å.; Singh, B.R. Sewage sludge disposal strategies for sustainable development. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 39–46, doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.010.
    5. Andriamananjara, A.; Rakotoson, T.; Razanakoto, O.; Razafimanantsoa, M.-P.; Rabeharisoa, L.; Smolders, E. Farmyard manure application in weathered upland soils of Madagascar sharply increase phosphate fertilizer use efficiency for upland rice. Field Crop. Res. 2018, 222, 94–100, doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.022.
    6. Vinodhini, V.; Das, N. Biowaste materials as sorbents to remove chromium (VI) from aqueous environment- a comparative study. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2009, 4, 19–23.
    7. Garau, G.; Porceddu, A.; Sanna, M.; Silvetti, M.; Castaldi, P. Municipal solid wastes as a resource for environmental recovery: Impact of water treatment residuals and compost on the microbial and biochemical features of As and trace metal-polluted soils. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 174, 445–454, doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.007.
    8. Soares, M.A.; Quina, M.J.; Quinta-Ferreira, R.M. Immobilisation of lead and zinc in contaminated soil using compost derived from industrial eggshell. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 164, 137–145, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.042.
    9. Fang, W.; Qi, G.; Wei, Y.; Kosson, D.S.; Van Der Sloot, H.A.; Liu, J. Leaching characteristic of toxic trace elements in soils amended by sewage sludge compost: A comparison of field and laboratory investigations. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 237, 244–252, doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.032.
    10. Fang, S.; Tsang, D.C.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, R. Stabilization of cationic and anionic metal species in contaminated soils using sludge-derived biochar. Chemosphere 2016, 149, 263–271, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.060.
    11. Chen, M.; Xu, P.; Zeng, G.; Yang, C.; Huang, D.; Zhang, J. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum, pesticides, chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting: Applications, microbes and future research needs. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 745–755, doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.05.003.
    12. Eurostats. Recycling of Biowaste. 2018. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/cei_wm030. (accessed on 25.June.2020).
    13. Mandal, S.; Kunhikrishnan, A.; Bolan, N.; Wijesekara, H.; Naidu, R. Application of biochar produced from biowaste materials for environmental protection and sustainable agriculture production. In Environmental Materials and Waste: Resource Recovery and Pollution Prevention; 2016, 73-89, doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803837-6.00004-4.
    14. Zielińska, A.; Oleszczuk, P.; Charmas, B.; Skubiszewska-Zięba, J.; Pasieczna-Patkowska, S. Effect of sewage sludge properties on the biochar characteristic. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 112, 201–213, doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2015.01.025.
    15. Li, Y.-Y.; Lu, X.; Kato, H.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.-Y. Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 559–577, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187.
    16. Cieślik, B.M.; Namieśnik, J.; Konieczka, P. Review of sewage sludge management: Standards, regulations and analytical methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 90, 1–15, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.031.
    17. Bartkiewicz, B.; Pierścieniak, M. Management of biogas produce in the methane fermentation process in wastewater treatment plants. Ochr. Sr. Zasobów Nat. 2011, 47, 39.
    18. European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (Text with EEA Relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 5, 39–85.
    19. Šuňovská, A.; Horník, M.; Pipíška, M.; Lesný, J.; Augustín, J.; Hostin, S. Characterization of soil additive derived from sewage sludge. Nova Biotechnol. Chim. 2013, 12, 141–153, doi:10.2478/nbec-2013-0016.
    20. Kchaou, R.; Baccar, R.; Bouzid, J.; Rejeb, S. The impact of sewage sludge and compost on winter triticale. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 25, 18314–18319, doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0609-7.
    21. Cesaro, A.; Belgiorno, V.; Guida, M. Compost from organic solid waste: Quality assessment and European regulations for its sustainable use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 94, 72–79, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.003.
    22. Füleky, G.; Benedek, S. Composting to recycle biowaste. In Sociology, Organic Farming, Climate Change and Soil Science; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 3.
    23. Sánchez, Ó.J.; Ospina, D.A.; Montoya, S. Compost supplementation with nutrients and microorganisms in composting process. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 136–153, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.012.
    24. Iqbal, M.K.; Shafiq, T.; Hussain, A.; Ahmed, K. Effect of enrichment on chemical properties of MSW compost. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5969–5977, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.105.
    25. Bernal, M.; Alburquerque, J.; Moral, R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5444–5453, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027.
    26. Grosser, A.; Neczaj, E.; Singh, B.; Almås, Å.R.; Brattebø, H.; Kacprzak, M. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge and municipal solid waste as co-substrates. Environ. Res. 2017, 155, 249–260, doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.007.
    27. Pandey, A.K.; Gaind, S.; Ali, A.; Nain, L. Effect of bioaugmentation and nitrogen supplementation on composting of paddy straw. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 293–306, doi:10.1007/s10532-008-9221-3.
    28. Gaind, S. Effect of fungal consortium and animal manure amendments on phosphorus fractions of paddy-straw compost. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 94, 90–97, doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.06.023.
    29. Kalemelawa, F.; Nishihara, E.; Endo, T.; Ahmad, Z.; Yeasmin, R.; Tenywa, M.M.; Yamamoto, S. An evaluation of aerobic and anaerobic composting of banana peels treated with different inoculums for soil nutrient replenishment. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 126, 375–382, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.030.
    30. Domínguez, J. Relationships between composting and vermicomposting. In Vermiculture Technology: Earthworms, Organic Wastes, and Environmental Management; Edwards, C.A., Arancon, N.Q., Sherman, R.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 11–26.
    31. Aksakal, E.L.; Sari, S.; Angin, I. Effects of Vermicompost Application on Soil Aggregation and Certain Physical Properties. Land Degrad. Dev. 2016, 27, 983–995, doi:10.1002/ldr.2350.
    32. Bang-Andreasen, T.; Nielsen, J.T.; Voriskova, J.; Heise, J.; Rønn, R.; Kjøller, R.; Hansen, H.C.B.; Jacobsen, C.S. Wood Ash Induced pH Changes Strongly Affect Soil Bacterial Numbers and Community Composition. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1400, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01400.
    33. Demeyer, A.; Nkana, J.V.; Verloo, M. Characteristics of wood ash and influence on soil properties and nutrient uptake: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 77, 287–295, doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00043-2.
    34. Mondal, S.; Singh, R.; Patra, A.; Dwivedi, B. Changes in soil quality in response to short-term application of municipal sewage sludge in a typic haplustept under cowpea-wheat cropping system. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2015, 4, 37–41, doi:10.1016/j.enmm.2014.12.001.
    35. Navas, A.; Bermúdez, F.; Machı́n, J. Influence of sewage sludge application on physical and chemical properties of Gypsisols. Geoderma 1998, 87, 123–135, doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00072-x.
    36. Roig, N.; Sierra, J.; Martí, E.; Nadal, M.; Schuhmacher, M.; Domingo, J.L. Long-term amendment of Spanish soils with sewage sludge: Effects on soil functioning. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 158, 41–48, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.016.
    37. Méndez, A.; Gómez, A.; Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Gascó, G. Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 1354–1359, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.092.
    38. Aggelides, S.; Londra, P. Effects of compost produced from town wastes and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 71, 253–259, doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00074-7.
    39. Fang, W.; Wei, Y.; Kosson, D.S. Comparative characterization of sewage sludge compost and soil: Heavy metal leaching characteristics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 310, 1–10, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.025.
    40. Oo, A.N.; Iwai, C.B.; Saenjan, P. Soil Properties and Maize Growth in Saline and Nonsaline Soils using Cassava‐Industrial Waste Compost and Vermicompost with or Without Earthworms. Land Degrad. Dev. 2013, 26, 300–310, doi:10.1002/ldr.2208.
    41. Brunetti, G.; Polo, A.; Plaza, C.; Senesi, N. Effects of sewage sludge amendment on humic acids and microbiological properties of a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2004, 39, 320–328, doi:10.1007/s00374-003-0709-z.
    42. Yazdanpanah, N.; Mahmoodabadi, M.; Cerdà, A. The impact of organic amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in semiarid lands. Geoderma 2016, 266, 58–65, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.032.
    43. Pérez-Piqueres, A.; Edel-Hermann, V.; Alabouvette, C.; Steinberg, C. Response of soil microbial communities to compost amendments. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 460–470, doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.025.
    44. Bailey, K.; Lazarovits, G. Suppressing soil-borne diseases with residue management and organic amendments. Soil Tillage Res. 2003, 72, 169–180, doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(03)00086-2.
    45. Santos, E.S.; Magalhães, M.C.F.; Abreu, M.M.; Macías, F. Effects of organic/inorganic amendments on trace elements dispersion by leachates from sulfide-containing tailings of the São Domingos mine, Portugal. Time evaluation. Geoderma 2014, 226, 188–203, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.02.004.
    46. Urbaniak, M.; Wyrwicka, A.; Tołoczko, W.; Serwecińska, L.; Zieliński, M. The effect of sewage sludge application on soil properties and willow (Salix sp.) cultivation. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 66–75, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.012.
    47. Placek, A.; Grobelak, A.; Hiller, J.; Stępień, W.; Jelonek, P.; Jaskulak, M.; Kacprzak, M. The Role of Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Carbon Sequestration and Immobilization of Heavy Metals in Degraded Soils. J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst. 2017, 5, 509–517, doi:10.13044/j.sdewes.d5.0166.
    48. Hattab, N.; Motelica-Heino, M.; Faure, O.; Bouchardon, J.-L. Effect of fresh and mature organic amendments on the phytoremediation of technosols contaminated with high concentrations of trace elements. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 159, 37–47, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.012.
    49. Jaskulak, M.; Rorat, A.; Grobelak, A.; Kacprzak, M. Antioxidative enzymes and expression of rbcL gene as tools to monitor heavy metal-related stress in plants. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 218, 71–78, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.052.
    50. Lukić, B.; Panico, A.; Huguenot, D.; Fabbricino, M.; Van Hullebusch, E.D.; Esposito, G. A review on the efficiency of landfarming integrated with composting as a soil remediation treatment. Environ. Technol. Rev. 2017, 6, 94–116, doi:10.1080/21622515.2017.1310310.
    51. Adenuga, A.O.; Johnson, J.H.; Cannon, J.N.; Wan, L. Bioremediation of PAH-Contaminated Soil via In-Vessel Composting. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 2331–2334, doi:10.2166/wst.1992.0729.
    52. Lukić, B.; Huguenot, D.; Panico, A.; Fabbricino, M.; Van Hullebusch, E.D.; Esposito, G. Importance of organic amendment characteristics on bioremediation of PAH-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 15041–15052, doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6635-z.
    53. Moreno, J.L.; Hernández, T.; Garcia, C. Effects of a cadmium-contaminated sewage sludge compost on dynamics of organic matter and microbial activity in an arid soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1999, 28, 230–237, doi:10.1007/s003740050487.
    54. Meena, M.D.; Joshi, P.K.; Narjary, B.; Sheoran, P.; Jat, H.S.; Chinchmalatpure, A.R.; Yadav, R.K.; Sharma, D.K. Effects of municipal solid waste compost, rice-straw compost and mineral fertilisers on biological and chemical properties of a saline soil and yields in a mustard–pearl millet cropping system. Soil Res. 2016, 54, 958–969, doi:10.1071/sr15342.
    55. Giusquiani, P.L.; Pagliai, M.; Gigliotti, G.; Businelli, D.; Benetti, A. Urban Waste Compost: Effects on Physical, Chemical, and Biochemical Soil Properties. J. Environ. Qual. 1995, 24, 175–182, doi:10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400010024x.
    56. Foley, B.J.; Cooperband, L.R. Paper Mill Residuals and Compost Effects on Soil Carbon and Physical Properties. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 2086–2095, doi:10.2134/jeq2002.2086.
    More