1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    CA125 and Ovarian Cancer

    Subjects: Oncology
    View times: 23

    Definition

     The tumour biomarker CA125 has been used as a biomarker for ovarian cancer detection and progression.

    1. CA125 

    Tumour biomarkers have played an essential role in the detection and management of ovarian cancer. Numerous ovarian cancer biomarkers have been the subject of extensive and intensive studies. Among these biomarkers, Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125), also referred to as Carbohydrate Antigen 125, has played the most significant role in screening, detecting, and managing ovarian cancer for the last four decades[1]. CA125 is a high molecular weight mucinous glycoprotein found on the surface of ovarian cancer cells. This antigen is then shed and quantified in serum samples of ovarian cancer patients. Serum CA125 levels are elevated in 50% of early-stage tumours, which are mostly type I ovarian cancers and 92% of advanced-stage tumours, which are mostly type II ovarian cancers[2][3]. However, due to the low incidence of ovarian cancer, screening average-risk women with CA125 results in a considerable number of false positives[4].

    Bast and colleagues first described CA125 in 1981 by developing a monoclonal antibody (OC125) against this antigen[5]. A radioimmunoassay was developed in 1983 to detect CA125 in serum using the 35 U/mL threshold. About 80% of patients with ovarian cancer exhibited elevated CA125 levels measured using this assay, while only 1% of healthy women in the study had elevated CA125 levels beyond 35 U/mL[6]. The upper limit of 35 U/mL has not changed since the first report.

    Further analysis revealed that CA125 is a large glycoprotein with variable weights due to variation in glycosylation[7]. The amino acid analysis showed that CA125 has a high serine, threonine, and proline content seen in mucin-like molecules[8]. Partial cDNA for the CA125 protein component was cloned in 2001 by Yin and Lloyd. Consequently, CA125 was found to be an epitope on a glycoprotein encoded by the MUC16 gene, located on the short arm of chromosome 19, at 19p13.3. Furthermore, MUC16 has multiple epitopes recognized by different antibodies[7]. Specifically, CA125 has two main antigenic domains, separately binding OC125-like antibodies (group A) and M11-like antibodies (group B)[3][9]. CA125II is another heterologous assay that replaced the original CA125 assay. CA125II uses both M11 on the solid phase and OC125 as a probe and has less intraassay variation[10][11].

    CA125, an epitope on the MUC16 molecule, has multiple physiological functions. MUC16 is a large glycoprotein with 22,152 core amino acids and a molecular mass of ~2.5 MDa. MUC16 contains a significant O- and N-linked glycosylated portion with a potential mass of ~20 MDa. It has distinct domains including, the amino-terminal, 60 tandem repeats of 156 amino acids, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail of 32 amino acids rich in tyrosine, threonine, and serine residues used for possible phosphorylation. This molecule is involved in ovarian tumorigenesis and metastasis[12].

    Biomarker-based diagnosis of ovarian cancer with CA125

    Biomarkers identify circulating tumour elements, proteins overexpressed by tumours, or components of the immune response to the tumour in body fluids such as blood and urine[13]. An ideal screening serum tumour marker has sufficient specificity and sensitivity to reach a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10% analogous to 1 cancer diagnosed out of 10 positive test results. There are two strategies for improving the PPV of screening tests. One approach is changing the screening population from asymptomatic women to symptomatic women who will have a higher frequency of ovarian cancer. The other approach is increasing the cutoff point for reducing false-positive results. Due to the low prevalence of ovarian cancer, the ideal screening test must have a sensitivity above 75% and a specificity of at least 99.6%[14][15][16][17].  In general, tumour biomarkers become clinically significant upon an accurate prediction of the disease at screening, management, and follow up phases of treatment. Currently, no single ovarian cancer biomarker performs well in all three phases.

    Understanding the variation between subtypes of ovarian cancer is an important factor for the development of useful biomarkers. CA125 expression varies between different subtypes of ovarian cancer. HGSC and endometroid ovarian cancers have a higher expression of CA125 compared to other subtypes[18]. Generally, serous tumours have higher CA125 concentrations, and mucinous ovarian cancers have the lowest[11]. Likewise, type I and II tumours have different CA125 expression patterns. Patients with type I ovarian cancer are usually younger and are more frequently diagnosed in the asymptomatic early stages. Similarly, multiple studies have shown significantly higher CA125 levels in type II patients than patients with type I tumours[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . Type II tumours account for 75% of ovarian carcinomas and 90% of ovarian cancer mortality[27]. In a study by Lu et al. on 14 ovarian cancer serologic markers, CA125 showed the highest discriminatory power for type II tumours compared to healthy controls[28]. Therefore, CA125 is a great screening candidate for the aggressive subtype (Type II) of ovarian cancer. 

    References

    1. Bast, R.C.; Feeney, M.; Lazarus, H.; Nadler, L.M.; Colvin, R.B.; Knapp, R.C. Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 1981, 68, 1331–1337.
    2. Van Haaften-Day, C.; Shen, Y.; Xu, F.; Yu, Y.; Berchuck, A.; Havrilesky, L.J.; de Bruijn, H.W.A.; van der Zee, A.G.J.; Bast, R.C.; Hacker, N.F. OVXL, macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and CA-125-II as tumor markers for epithelial ovarian carcinoma a critical appraisal. Cancer 2001, 92, 2837–2844.
    3. Nustad, K.; Bast, R.C.; O’brien, T.J.; Nilsson, O.; Seguin, P.; Suresh, M.R.; Saga, T.; Nozawa, S.; Børmer, O.P.; de Bruijn, H.W.A.; et al. Specificity and affinity of 26 monoclonal antibodies against the CA 125 antigen: First report from the ISOBM TD-1 workshop. Tumor. Biol. 1996, 17, 196–219.
    4. Henderson, J.T.; Webber, E.M.; Sawaya, G.F. Screening for Ovarian Cancer updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2018, 319, 595–606.
    5. Bast, R.C.; Feeney, M.; Lazarus, H.; Nadler, L.M.; Colvin, R.B.; Knapp, R.C. Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. Clin. Investig.1981, 68, 1331–1337.
    6. Bast, R.C.; Klug, T.L.; John, E.S.; Jenison, E.; Niloff, J.M.; Lazarus, H.; Berkowitz, R.S.; Leavitt, T.; Griffiths, C.T.; Parker, L.; et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Engl. J. Med.1983, 309, 883–887.
    7. Yin, B.W.T.; Lloyd, K.O. Molecular cloning of the CA125 Ovarian Cancer antigen: Identification as a new mucin, MUC16. Biol. Chem.2001, 276, 27371–27375.
    8. Lloyd, K.O.; Yin, B.W.T.; Kudryashov, V. Isolation and characterization of Ovarian Cancer antigen CA 125 using a new monoclonal antibody (VK-8): Identification as a mucin-type molecule. J. Cancer1997, 71, 842–850.
    9. Hardardottir, H.; Parmley, T.H.; Quirk, J.G.; Sanders, M.M.; Miller, F.C.; O’Brien, T.J. Distribution of CA 125 in embryonic tissues and adult derivatives of the fetal periderm. J. Obstet. Gynecol.1990, 163, 1925–1931.
    10. Jacobs, I.J.; Menon, U. Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of Ovarian Cancer. Cell. Proteomics2004, 3, 355–366.
    11. Tamakoshi, K.; Kikkawa, F.; Hasegawa, N.; Ishikawa, H.; Mizuno, K.; Kawai, M.; Tomoda, Y. Clinical value of a new serum tumor marker, ca125ii, in gynecologic disease: Comparison with ca125. Obstet. Investig.1995, 39, 125–129.
    12. Hattrup, C.L.; Gendler, S.J. Structure and Function of the Cell Surface (Tethered) Mucins. Rev. Physiol.2008, 70, 431–457.
    13. Roy, H.K.; Khandekar, J.D. Biomarkers for the early detection of cancer: An inflammatory concept. Intern. Med.2007, 167, 1822–1824.
    14. Clarke-Pearson, D.L. Clinical practice. Screening for Ovarian Cancer. Engl. J. Med.2009, 361, 170–177.
    15. Nossov, V.; Amneus, M.; Su, F.; Lang, J.; Janco, J.M.T.; Reddy, S.T.; Farias-Eisner, R. The early detection of ovarian cancer: From traditional methods to Proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125? J. Obs. Gynecol.2008, 199, 215–223.
    16. Bast, J.; Xu, F.J.; Yu, Y.H.; Barnhill, S.; Zhang, Z.; Mills, G.B. CA 125: The past and the future. J. Biol. Markers1998, 13, 179–187.
    17. Jacobs, I.; Prys Davies, A.; Bridges, J.; Stabile, I.; Fay, T.; Lower, A.; Grudzinskas, J.G.; Oram, D. Prevalence screening for Ovarian Cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography. Med. J.1993, 306, 1030–1034.
    18. Köbel, M.; Kalloger, S.E.; Boyd, N.; McKinney, S.; Mehl, E.; Palmer, C.; Leung, S.; Bowen, N.J.; Ionescu, D.N.; Rajput, A.; et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: Implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med.2008, 5, 1749–1760.
    19. Alcázar, J.L.; Utrilla-Layna, J.; Mínguez, J.Á.; Jurado, M. Clinical and ultrasound features of type I and type II epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J. Gynecol. Cancer2013, 23, 680–684.
    20. Leandersson, P.; Kalapotharakos, G.; Henic, E.; Borgfeldt, H.; Petzold, M.; Høyer-Hansen, G.; Borgfeldt, C. A biomarker panel increases the diagnostic performance for epithelial Ovarian Cancer type I and II in young women. Anticancer Res.2016, 36, 957–965.
    21. Kristjansdottir, B.; Levan, K.; Partheen, K.; Sundfeldt, K. Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type i and type II epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Oncol.2013, 131, 52–58.
    22. Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, W.; Chang, D.Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, X.; Jia, L.; Rosen, D.G.; Zhang, W.; Yang, D.; et al. CA-125 level as a prognostic indicator in type i and type ii epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J. Gynecol. Cancer2013, 23, 815–822.
    23. Gąsiorowska, E.; Ginekologicznej, K.O. Clinical application of HE4 and CA125 in Ovarian Cancer Type I and Type II detection and differential diagnosis. Pol.2015, 86, 88–93.
    24. Yanaranop, M.; Jantarateptewan, N.; Tiyayon, J.; Nakrangsee, S. Significance of serum human epididymis protein 4 and cancer antigen 125 in distinguishing type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancers. J. Gynecol. Cancer2018, 28, 1058–1065.
    25. Liu, D.; Zhang, L.; Indima, N.; Peng, K.; Li, Q.; Hua, T.; Tang, G. CT and MRI findings of type I and type II epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J. Radiol.2017, 90, 225–233.
    26. Fujiwara, H.; Suzuki, M.; Takeshima, N.; Takizawa, K.; Kimura, E.; Nakanishi, T.; Yamada, K.; Takano, H.; Sasaki, H.; Koyama, K.; et al. Evaluation of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools of type I and type II epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Japanese women. Biol.2015, 36, 1045–1053.
    27. Kurman, R.J.; Shih, I.-M. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial Ovarian Cancer. shifting the paradigm. Pathol.2011, 42, 918–931.
    28. Lu, D.; Kuhn, E.; Bristow, R.E.; Giuntoli, R.L.; Kjær, S.K.; Shih, I.-M.; Roden, R.B.S. Comparison of candidate serologic markers for type I and type II Ovarian Cancer. Oncol.2011, 122, 560–566.
    More