1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Psophocarpus Tetragonolobus

    Subjects: Plant Sciences
    View times: 58
    Contributors: Akram Hijazi , Othmane Merah ,
    Submitted by: Akram Hijazi


    Natural products, particularly those extracted from plants, have been used as therapy for different diseases for thousands of years. The first written records on the plants used in natural medicine, referred to as “medicinal plants”, go back to about 2600 BC. A thorough and complete understanding of medicinal plants encompasses a multiplex of overlapping and integrated sciences such as botany, pharmacognosy, chemistry, enzymology and genetics. Psophocarpus tetragonolobus, a member of Fabaceae family also called winged bean, is a perennial herbaceous plant characterized by its tuberous roots and its winged pod twinning and a perennial legume rich in proteins, oils, vitamins and carbohydrates. Besides nutrients, winged bean also contains bioactive compounds that have therapeutic activities like anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, antibacterial, antifungal, antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity, a few of which already been reported. This plant can also be used as a medicinal plant for future benefits.

    1. Introduction

    Over time and since the dawn of societies, humans have learned to probe and categorize plant materials to meet the essentials of life. Herbs and their extracts were used for their healing powers. The medicinal plants sector has undergone a remarkable evolution, especially during the last decade. The global market is moving more and more towards products of natural origin. Plants that are used in natural medicine were referred to as “medicinal plants” [1].

    During the 19th century, several alkaloids isolated from unique plant species were used as medicinal drugs such as atropine from “Atropa belladonna” (Solanaceae), saclin from “Salix” species (Salicaceae) and morphine and codeine from “Papaver somniferum” (Papaveraceae). Subsequently, the bioactive secondary metabolites derived from plants were widely used as drugs in their original and modified forms [2]. A direct relationship between the use of herbal plants and modern drugs isolated from these plants has been established, where 88 compounds isolated from seventy-seven medicinal plants were then introduced into the current treatments [3]. Nowadays, most of the world’s population still depends on plants for their primary health care according to the World’s Health Organization (WHO). In this review, we will discuss the chemical constituents, biological properties and benefits of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus.

    2. Psophocarpus tetragonolobus: Botany, Genetic and Cultivation

    Psophocarpus tetragonolobus is also called Lotus tetragonolobus, asparagus pea, goa bean, four-angled bean and winged bean [4]. Winged bean is a tropical leguminous plant that is listed as one of the underutilized legumes and it is an underexploited food source for the tropics. P. tetragonolobus is known as “poor man’s food” since the leaves, flowers, roots, and pods are eaten raw or cooked. Apart from being an edible plant, the fruits are reported to have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-nociceptive activities [4].

    2.1. Origin and Distribution

    Winged bean, a domestic plant, is distributed in South East Asia, in the countries situated between India and Papua New Guinea, along with some African countries. The relation between Psophocarpus tetragonolobus and other Psophocarpus species is mainly identified depending on morphology [5][6]. However, comparing the genetic makeup of these plants will be a more reliable approach that can help to identify the wild ancestor of this plant. Till now, different theories are suggested concerning the origin of this plant. Southeastern Asia was suggested as an origin because the plant was cultivated in this area for a long time. However, the progenitor was not known and it was assumed to be extinct. Papua New Guinea is another possible origin due to the large repertoire of genetic varieties of plants in this country. Winged bean was also found to be similar to some African plants in terms of morphology, cytology and pathology [7].

    2.2. Morphology

    Winged bean is a climbing twinning plant (climb up to 3–5 m). It has green trifoliate leaves made up from three leaflets of ovate to deltoid shape. It produces 2.5 to 3.5 cm wide flowers with colors ranging from purple, white and blue, blue to red. The pollen grains are spheroidal with a polar axis that measures between 42.3 and 51.6 cm and an equatorial axis that measure between 43.4 and 49.9 cm. Its roots are tuberous; a tuber ranges in size between 8 and 12 cm in length and 2 to 4 cm in width. It produces elongated pods (the fruit) with four corners (Figure 1) and at each one the pod bears a wing, hence the name of winged bean. Each pod ranges from 15 to 30 cm in length, and it is about 3 cm in width [8].

    Figure 1. A Psophocarpus tetragonolobus plant.

    At the cellular level, a study of seven plants of winged bean from Okianawa (Japan) revealed that its cells have thick cell walls with plasmodesmata. Cotyledonary cells analysis was done after flowering. At day 30, starch granules in amyloplasts are observed. Also, the cells contained tubular rough endoplasmic reticulum and vacuoles containing dense flocculent material. At day 45, lipid and protein bodies appear [9].

    2.3. Diversity and Molecular Characterization

    Understanding the genetic diversity of a plant species is important for producing genetic improvement for better characteristics and benefits. Moreover, analyzing the variability in traits between plants of different origins, and comparing those traits to the genome and transcriptome may help in molecular breeding to produce plats of winged bean with desirable agronomic traits [10].

    The genetic resources for winged bean are not rich because its ancestor is not yet identified. Nevertheless, the comparison of its genome with other legumes that were fully sequenced can be interesting. Those legumes include: Glycine max, Cicer arietinum, Lotus japonicas, Cajanus cajan, Phaseolus vulgaris and Medicago truncatula [10]. More studies are now performed also for sequencing of the genome of Lupinus angustifolius, Trifolium pratense, Pisum sativum and Arachis hypogea [11]. Nowadays, in conjugation to the already published sequencing data, the available inexpensive genomic techniques open an avenue for investigating the genomic makeup of the winged bean. A study on 24 accessions of winged bean was done and identified that ISSR markers were more efficient than RADP markers. Consequently, Chen et al. studied ISSR markers in 45 accessions to understand genetic variability, and the results of genetic distance and genetic identity between the accessions of winged bean showed a closed relationship and narrow genetic background. [12]. On the other hand, Vatanparast et al. strengthened the genetic resources for Psophocarpus tetragonolobus by producing a de novo transcriptome assembly and annotation of two Sri Lankan accessions (denoted herein as CPP34 [PI 491423] and CPP37 [PI 639033]), developing simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, and identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between geographically separated genotypes [13]. Another transcriptomic study was done on seedling from winged bean (Ibadan Local-1) and identified around 1900 microsatellites and around 1800 conserved orthologous loci [14], also Wong et al. sequenced transcriptomes of plants from Malaysia and found 9682 SSR markers, among which 18 were validated for nine accessions [15], these sets of microsatellite markers could be used to contribute to genetic linkage maps in winged bean, with the integration of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers for higher density.

    Comparison of gene expression between winged bean plants contrasted for their tannin production revealed more than 1000 differentially expressed genes. This result allowed developing and cultivating cultivars with low tannin content [16]. Furthermore, twenty-two mutations were found with desirable outcomes in terms of morphology and chlorophyll content. However, these mutants were sterile. A gene that has anti-fungal effects (class III chitinase) was shown to be expressed in the roots of winged bean plants [17].

    Unfortunately, this species received less attention that other economically important Fabaceae species (soybean, peanut for example) to develop breeding programs to improve plant resistance against major diseases or pests.

    3. Therapeutic Potential of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus

    Winged bean was used since a long time as a medicinal plant in different countries: its fruits and roots were used as medicines that increase strength, and as treatment of ulcers in New Guinea [18]. Moreover, its leaves were used as treatment of small pox and its tubers were used in the treatment of vertigo in Malaya, both for external use. Nowadays, different studies were done to investigate the anti-oxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative activities of different extracts from this plant [19][20].

    3.1. Anti-Oxidant Activity of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus

    Winged bean is a source of many known antioxidants like vitamin C, and it is also rich in polyphenols and flavonoids. Phenolic compounds are very important as antioxidants. Their antioxidant effects anticarcinogenic, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumoral, antimicrobial, antimutagenic, anti-aggregate, anti-ischaemic and anti-allergic. Phenolics also alleviate cardiovascular diseases [21][22]. Phenolic compounds are responsible for the antioxidant activity of fruits as a result of their redox properties that allow them to act as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, singlet oxygen quenchers and metal chelators [23]. Flavonoids are secondary metabolites widely found in fruits, vegetables and legumes. They have been linked with several biological activities which include antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral and anticancer effects [24]. Several studies have showed that the consumption of flavonoid-rich foods protect against diseases associated with oxidative stress [25][26]. In the seeds, the phenolic content ranged between 0.8 and 0.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g and the total flavonoids ranged between 0.7 and 1.2 mg quercetin equivalent/g, and the total antioxidant capacity was between 1.3 and 1.8 mg AAE/g. Thus, they can serve as sources of health-promoting nutrients and phytochemicals for human and animals. Different studies examined various extracts and fractions of winged bean for their antioxidant activities, using different techniques [27].

    A 75% methanol extracts and its ethyl acetate and chloroform fractions, n-butanol, petroleum ether, and the methanolic plant extracts all showed an antioxidant activity. By ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP() and ferric thiocyanate (FTC) techniques, the ethyl acetate fraction of the methanolic extracts had the highest antioxidant activity and the highest phenolic content (1.7 mg GAE/g) compared to the chloroform fraction and the methanol extract itself. However, by the 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) assay, the chloroform fraction had the highest antioxidant activity. n-Butanol and petroleum ether extracts were proved to have anti-oxidant activity using ABTS and FRAP assays, and the phenolic content was shown to be correlated with the anti-oxidant activity.

    Total phenolic contents are influenced by the concentration of extract. Among all the fractions, the ethyl acetate fractions exhibited the highest total phenolic content comparing to methanol and chloroform fraction. It was suggested that the antioxidant activity of P. tetragonolobus was highest in chloroform extract as compared to methanol and ethyl acetate [19].

    3.2. Anti-Bacterial and Anti-Fungal Properties of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus

    The anti-microbial activity of the winged bean was manifested as both antibacterial and anti-fungal effects. A methanol extract from the leaves or from the roots was shown to kill and inhibit the growth of both Pseudomonas aeruginosa (a bacterium species) and Candida albicans (a species of fungus), respectively. This was proved using the disk diffusion and the broth dilution assays. In the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 2.6 mg/mL, whereas in the case of Candida albicans, the MIC was 3.1 mg/mL. In both cases, after 36 h of incubation, there was a morphological change of the microbe as examined by a scanning electron microscope. The extract was tested in vivo on rats to study toxicity, in the dose of 2 g/kg, and no rats were killed. Different fractions of extracts from tubers, leaves, stems and pods were studied by disk diffusion assay for their anti-microbial activity. The fractions used were chloroform fraction, ethyl acetate fraction and ethanol fraction. All were effective against all the tested microbes (11 bacteria, four molds and four yeasts), with the pod having the highest activity and the leaves having the lowest. All the fractions were effective with the ethanol fraction having the highest activity, whereas chloroform fraction had the lowest activity [16][28].

    3.3. Anti-Proliferative Activity of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus

    In a study on human colon cancer cell line (HT-29), a methanol extract was shown to have strong antiproliferative activity using the sulforhodamine B assay. However, the n-butanol fraction had even higher activity [29]. On the other hand, Helicobacter pylori are a bacterial species that targets the gastric epithelium and may cause gastric cancer. The infection is dependent on the binding of bacteria to gastric epithelial cells, and this binding requires MUC1 and MUC5AC, which are mucins found on the gastric cells. The high level of proteins in the P. tetragonolobus, namely, lectins, is used as a diagnostic tool because it binds certain blood cells and specialized transport cells [30]. Lectins from winged bean were able to decrease the expression of these mucins and two other antigens (Lewis b and H type 1) in gastric cells as shown by ELISA assay [31].

    3.4. Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Nociceptive Properties of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus

    Winged bean seeds have a potential anti-inflammatory activity due to the presence of a peptide that can act as an inhibitor for angiotensin-converting enzyme [32]. Moreover, the anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of six Malaysian medicinal plants were evaluated, including Psophocarpus tetragonolobus. The anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive activities of the plant extracts were evaluated by using Griess assay and by measuring the number of writhing response of mice upon acetic acid induction respectively. All plants showed significant nitric oxide (NO) inhibitory activity upon IFN-γ/LPS treated macrophages in a concentration-dependent way without causing cytotoxicity to RAW 264.7 cells; in addition to that all plants lead to the suppression of writhing response of mice at different degrees of inhibition (10.7 to 43.1%) at 0.2 g/kg [33].

    This entry is adapted from 10.3390/plants9121730


    1. Samuelsson, G. Drugs of Natural Origin: A Textbook of Pharmacognosy. Apotekarsocieteten: Stockholm, Sweden, 1999; pp. 119–123.
    2. Fabricant, D.S.; Farnsworth, N.R. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 69–75.
    3. Farnsworth, N.R.; Loub, W.D. Phytochemists aren’t perfect but almost. J. Pharm. Sci. 1979, 68, A6.
    4. Hymowitz, T.; Boyd, J. Origin, Ethnobotany and agricultural potential of the winged bean—Psophocarpus tetragonolobus. Econ. Bot. 1977, 31, 180–188.
    5. Fatihah, H.N.N.; Maxted, N.; Arce, L.R. Cladistic analysis of Psophocarpus Neck DC. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) based on morphological characters. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 83, 78–88.
    6. Verdcourt, B.; Halliday, P. A revision of Psophocarpus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseoleae). Kew Bull. 1978, 33, 191–227.
    7. Smartt, J. Some observations on the origin and evolution of the winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus). Euphytica 1980, 29, 121–123.
    8. National Research Council. Winged Bean: A High-Protein Crop for the Tropics; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1981.
    9. Said, K.; Nakano, Y.; Uemoto, S. Microstructure of Winged Beans. Food Microstruct. 1983, 2, 175–181.
    10. Schwembera, A.R.; Carrasco, B.; Gepts, P. Unraveling agronomic and genetic aspects of runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.). Field Crops Res. 2017, 206, 86–94.
    11. Galeano, C.H.; Fernandez, A.C.; Franco-Herrera, N.; Cichy, K.A.; McClean, P.E.; Vanderleyden, J.; Blair, M.W. Saturation of anintra-gene pool linkage map: Towards a unified consensus linkagemap for fine mapping and synteny analysis in common bean. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28135.
    12. Chen, D.; Yi, X.; Yang, H.; Zhou, H.; Yu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Lu, X. Genetic diversity evaluation of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2015, 62, 823–828.
    13. Vatanparast, M.; Shetty, P.; Chopra, R.; Doyle, J.J.; Sathyanarayana, N.; Egan, A.N. Transcriptome sequencing and marker development in winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus; Leguminosae). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29070.
    14. Chapman, M.A. Transcriptome sequencing and marker development for four underutilized legumes. Appl. Plant Sci. 2015, 3, 1400111.
    15. Wong, Q.N.; Tanzi, A.S.; Ho, W.K.; Malla, S.; Blythe, M.; Karunaratne, A.; Massawe, F.; Mayes, S. Development of gene based SSR markers in winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) for diversity assessment. Genes 2017, 8, 100.
    16. Singh, V.; Goel, R.; Pande, V.; Asif, M.H.; Mohanty, C.S. De novo sequencing and comparative analysis of leaf transcriptomes of diverse condensed tannin-containing lines of underutilized Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44733.
    17. Esaka, M.; Teramoto, T. cDNA cloning, gene expression and secretion of chitinase in winged bean. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998, 39, 349–356.
    18. Perry, L.M.; Metzger, J. Medicinal Plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed Properties and Uses; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980.
    19. Nazri, N.A.A.; Ahmat, N.; Adnan, A.; Mohamad, S.A.S.; Ruzaina, S.A.S. In vitro antibacterial and radical scavenging activities of Malaysian table salad. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 5728–5735.
    20. Khalili, R.M.A.; Shafekh, S.E.; Norhayati, A.H.; Fatahudin, I.M.; Rahimah, R.; Norkamaliah, H.; Azimah, A.N. Total phenolic content and in vitro antioxidant activity of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus). Pak. J. Nutr. 2013, 12, 416–422.
    21. Kim, D.O.; Jeong, S.; Lee, C. Antioxidant capacity of phenolic phytochemicals from various cultivars of plums. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 321–326.
    22. De Rigal, D.; Gauillard, F.; Richard-Forget, F. Changes in the carotenoid content of apricot (Prunus armeniaca, var Bergeron) during enzymatic browning: β-carotene inhibition of chlorogenic acid degradation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 763–768.
    23. Macheix, J.J. Fruit Phenolic; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990.
    24. Umamaheswari, M.; Chatterjee, T.K. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of the Fractions of Coccinia Grandis L. Leaf Extract. Afr. J. Tradit. Compl. Altern. Med. 2008, 5, 61–73.
    25. Ren, W.; Qiao, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, L. Flavonoids: Promising anticancer agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 519–534.
    26. Olaiya, C.O.; Soetan, K.O.; Esan, A.M. The role of nutraceuticals, functional foods and value-added food products in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2016, 10, 185–193.
    27. Olaiya, C.O.; Soetan, K.O.; Karigidi, K.O. Evaluation of in vitro antioxidant capacities of six accessions of winged beans (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus). EC Nutr. 2018, 13, 589–595.
    28. Sasidharan, S.; Zuraini, Z.; Yoga Latha, L.; Suryani, S. Fungicidal Effect and Oral Acute Toxicity of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus. Root Extract. Pharm. Biol. 2008, 46, 261–265.
    29. Manosroia, A.; Akazawab, H.; Akihisae, T.; Jantrawuta, P.; Kitdamrongthama, W.; Manosroig, W.; Manosroia, J. In vitro anti-proliferative activity on colon cancer cell line (HT-29) of Thai medicinal plants selected from Thai/Lanna medicinal plant recipe database “MANOSROI III”. J. Ethnopharm. 2015, 161, 11–17.
    30. Radziejewska, I.; Borzym-Kluczyk, M.; Leszczyńska, K.; Wosek, J.; Bielawska, A. Lotus tetragonolobus and Maackiaamurensis lectins influence phospho-I k B a, IL-8, Lewis b and H type 1 glycoforms levels in H. pylori infected CRL-1739 gastric cancer cells. J. Adv. Med. Sci. 2018, 63, 205–211.
    31. Mohtar, W.; Hamid, W.A.; Abd-Aziz, S.; Muhamad, S.K.; Saari, N. Preparation of bioactive peptide with high angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory activity from winged bean [Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.] seed. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 3658–3668.
    32. Lee, K.H.; Padzil, A.M.; Ahmad, S.; Abdullah, N.R.; Saad, W.Z.; Maziah, M.; Sulaiman, M.R.; Israf, D.A.; Shaari, K.; Lajis, N.H. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antinociceptive activities of six Malaysian medicinal plants. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 5555–5563.
    33. Egan, A.N.; Vatanparast, M.; Cagle, W. Parsing polyphyletic Pueraria: Delimiting distinct evolutionary lineages through phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2015, 104, 44–59.