Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Bladder Cancer

    Subjects: Oncology
    View times: 21
    Submitted by: Jose Ignacio López


    The overwhelming majority of bladder cancers are transitional cell carcinomas. Albeit mostly monotonous, carcinomas in the bladder may occasionally display a broad spectrum of histological features that should be recognized by pathologists because some of them represent a diagnostic problem and/or lead prognostic implications. Sometimes these features are focal in the context of conventional transitional cell carcinomas, but some others are generalized across the tumor making its recognition a challenge. For practical purposes, the review distributes the morphologic spectrum of changes in architecture and cytology. Thus, nested and large nested, micropapillary, myxoid stroma, small tubules and adenoma nephrogenic-like, microcystic, verrucous, and diffuse lymphoepithelioma-like, on one hand, and plasmacytoid, signet ring, basaloid-squamous, yolk-sac, trophoblastic, rhabdoid, lipid/lipoblastic, giant, clear, eosinophilic (oncocytoid), and sarcomatoid, on the other, are revisited. Key histological and immunohistochemical features useful in the differential diagnosis are mentioned. In selected cases, molecular data associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and/or treatment are also included.

    1. Introduction

    Bladder cancer is a frequent neoplasm [1] in which tobacco use, pollution, and other varied agents have been directly implicated in its genesis and development [2]. Most of them are composed of transitional cells of low/intermediate grade, papillary architecture, and invasion limited to the lamina propria and submucosa. However, a smaller but significant number of cases do display dismal features like high-grade, non-papillary growth patterns, and muscularis propria invasion, with these patients pursuing an aggressive clinical course.

    Aside from transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), other histological subtypes, like conventional squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine carcinoma, are quite frequently seen in clinical practice, alone or in combination, particularly in the context of high-grade cases. These cases are not the subject of this review.

    Although TCC is a histologically monotonous neoplasm composed in the vast majority of cases by easily recognizable transitional cells, a small subset of cases displays a broad spectrum of architectural and/or cytological characteristics that should be recognized since some of them carry diagnostic difficulties and/or prognostic implications [3]. This recognition is increasingly important now that very promising advances linking morphological variants with genomic signatures are being identified [4].

    Clinical practice allows the pathologist to face unusual histological subtypes of urothelial carcinomas (UC), and conventional TCC displaying focal/extensive morphologic variations of uncertain significance. This narrative collects 25 years of personal experience of the authors in the routine diagnosis of bladder cancer.

    2. Architectural Changes

    2.1. Nested and Large Nested Architecture

    Talbert and Young reported in 1989 three cases of a deceptively benign bladder carcinoma characterized by small packed cellular aggregates closely resembling von Brunn nests and nephrogenic adenoma [5]. Isolated cases of this histological subtype of bladder cancer had previously appeared in the literature, always being referred to as of von Brunn nest origin [6]. Now, nested UC is well recognized and fully characterized by histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular perspectives [7][8]. Under the microscope, nested UC appears as a non-papillary neoplastic growth of bland cells with scarce atypia arranged in small nests (Figure 1a) showing an evident infiltrating growth pattern at different levels of the bladder wall. Typically, the tumor does not induce a stromal reaction nor is accompanied by inflammatory infiltrates. Problems to recognize nested UC may arise in small superficial biopsies if crushing artifacts are present or if the infiltrative nature is not seen.

    Figure 1. Architectural changes in bladder cancer (with original magnifications included). (a) Nested pattern (×100), (b) large nested pattern (×100), (c) micropapillary pattern (×250), (d) vascular invasion in the micropapillary pattern (×100), (e) myxoid basophilic stroma (×400), (f) small tubules (×100), (g) microcystic pattern (×100), (h) verrucous pattern (×40), and (i) lymphoepithelioma-like pattern (×250).

    2.2. Micropapillary Architecture

    UC may sometimes display a micropapillary architecture. Delicate, thin, and fragile papillae without stromal axis are the hallmark of this morphological variant of UC (Figure 1c). To note, the invasive component of micropapillary UC shows nests with cells detached from the basal membrane, a typical artifact in this tumor that mimics lymphatic invasion and is associated with biological aggressiveness [9]. The vascular invasion is a very frequent histological finding (Figure 1d). Aside from rare pure examples, the majority of cases are mixed with a conventional transitional cell carcinoma, usually high grade. Like the rest of micropapillary carcinomas across the body [10], this histological subtype of UC has a dismal prognosis, even worse than conventional high-grade UC at the same stage [11], and typically presents with advanced stages at diagnosis. Although exceptional, micropapillary carcinomas from other sites may metastasize to the urinary bladder [12], making the correct diagnosis more difficult.

    The first description of this variant of UC was made in 1994 by Amin et al. [13], where they stressed the histological similarities of this bladder tumor with the classic papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. After that, many series have been published all along the urinary tract, including the renal pelvis and ureter [14][15].

    Abundant immunohistochemical and molecular analyses have been performed in micropapillary UC [16][17][18] all confirming its aggressive potential. Although initially thought to be a variant of adenocarcinoma by some authors [19], Yang et al. have very recently reported that the micropapillary UC is not a variant of adenocarcinoma [18].

    2.3. Myxoid Stromal Change

    UC may display focal myxoid changes in the stroma (Figure 1e) mimicking the colloid adenocarcinomas seen in other sites. This change has been previously reported [20][21] and when observed in transurethral resection specimens, may lead to an erroneous interpretation of colonic adenocarcinoma invading the bladder wall. Solid cell nests immersed in a basophilic edematous stroma are the hallmark of this histological change, which is usually focal but can be generalized in some isolated cases. Again, immunohistochemistry is of much help in cases in which the transitional phenotype of the tumor is not evident on hematoxylin-eosin slides. GATA3 positivity, co-expression of CK7 and CK20, and CDX-2 negativity should resolve the diagnostic dilemma in doubtful cases [20]. Attention must be paid, however, to the occasional CK7 positivity of some colorectal adenocarcinomas, a finding that is a sign of dismal prognosis [22].

    2.4. Small Tubules and Nephrogenic Adenoma-Like Architecture

    Very occasionally, UC is composed of low-grade cells arranged in small tubules resembling cystitis glandularis or nephrogenic adenoma (Figure 1f) [23]. The bland cytologic features of this histologic subtype contrast with its frank infiltrative nature, even reaching the muscularis propria in some cases. Since nephrogenic adenoma may display also a concerning pseudo-infiltrative growth [24], an immunohistochemical study with PAX-8, CK7, p63, and napsin A [25] may be useful to make the differential diagnosis in problematic cases. The clinical significance of this histologic change is not established so far.

    3. Cytological Changes

    3.1. Plasmacytoid Cells

    Plasmacytoid UC is an aggressive tumor. This cytologic variant of UC can present as pure tumors or mixed with conventional UC and/or with other non-conventional UC. For example, mixed micropapillary and plasmacytoid UC cases have been occasionally reported [26]. Histological similarities with multiple myeloma were noticed since the first report by Sahin et al. in 1991 [27]. Since this original description, several large series have been published so far all of them confirming its dismal prognosis [28].

    In its typical presentation, the tumor appears as flat, non-papillary, highly cellular masses growing diffusely in the urinary tract wall with infiltrative edges and frequent vascular invasion images. Neoplastic cells are non-cohesively arranged and show lateralized cytoplasm, nuclear atypia, and high mitotic count (Figure 2a). In doubtful cases, or patients with a previous history of plasma cell dyscrasia, immunohistochemistry is of help revealing its epithelial, non-plasmacytic, nature. Briefly, GATA-3 and CK7 are positive and CD 38 is negative. Positive immunostaining with CD 138 may be observed in this neoplasm, but this finding does not preclude the diagnosis of plasmacytoid UC [29].

    Figure 2. Cytological changes in bladder cancer. (a) Plasmacytoid cells (×250), (b) basaloid and squamous cells (×250), (c) syncytiotrophoblastic cells (×250), (d) trophoblastic cells (×250), (e) lipoblastic-like cells (×400), (f) pleomorphic giant cells (×250), (g) clear cells (×100), (h) eosinophilic (oncocytoid) cells (×400), and (i) sarcomatoid cells (×250).

    HER2 overexpression has been observed by FISH in plasmacytoid UC [30]. Contrary to what happens in most UC, plasmacytoid variants do not seem to harbor TP53 gene mutations in a sequencing analysis [29]. On the other hand, TERT gene promoter mutations have been detected [31]. A study using whole-exome sequencing has detected somatic alterations in the CDH1 gene of 84% of plasmacytoid UC, a finding of clinical aggressiveness that seems to be specific to this tumor variant [32].

    3.2. Signet-Ring Cells

    Since signet-ring cell features are very rare in UC, and their identification in transurethral resection specimens can raise the possibility of a metastatic seed from a neoplasm originating in the digestive tract. A careful search of the classical urothelial features (nests of transitional cells, papillae, in situ carcinoma in the surface epithelium, etc.) in the biopsy, if present, may be of help in the differential diagnosis. Otherwise, the clinical context of the patient and a basic immunohistochemical panel, for example, CK7/20, GATA-3, CDX-2, and p63, should resolve the dilemma. The analysis of the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of 318 such cases confirms the worse prognosis of this histologic variant compared with conventional UC [33].

    3.3. Basaloid-Squamous Cells

    Basaloid-squamous cell carcinomas are aggressive neoplasms mainly located in the head and neck [34] and anal [35] regions. The tumor is extraordinarily uncommon in the urinary tract, with only a handful of single cases published to date [36][37][38][39]. Everywhere, most basaloid squamous cell carcinomas are associated with HPV infection [39].

    Histologically, the tumor is deeply infiltrative and shows a typical biphasic pattern (Figure 2b). Basaloid atypical cells with high mitotic rate and scarce cytoplasm are arranged in lobes and nests showing peripheral palisading and stromal reaction. Basaloid nests are centered by squamous islands with evident keratinization. p16 is intensely positive in tumor cells.

    The entry is from 10.3390/cancers12123706


    1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30.
    2. Teoh, J.Y.; Huang, J.; Ko, W.Y.; Lok, V.; Choi, P.; Ng, C.F.; Sengupta, S.; Mostafid, H.; Kamat, A.M.; Black, P.C.; et al. Global trends of bladder cancer incidence and mortality, and their associations with tobacco use and gross domestic products per capita. Eur. Urol. 2020.
    3. Lobo, N.; Shariat, S.F.; Guo, C.C.; Fernandez, M.I.; Kassouf, W.; Choudhury, A.; Gao, J.; Williams, S.B.; Galsky, M.D.; Taylor III, J.A.; et al. What is the significance of variant histology in urothelial carcinoma? Eur. Urol. Focus. 2020, 6, 653–663.
    4. Al-Ahmadie, H.; Netto, G.J. Updates on the genomics of bladder cancer and novel molecular taxonomy. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2020, 27, 36–43.
    5. Talbert, M.L.; Young, R.H. Carcinomas of the urinary bladder with deceptively benign-appearing foci. A report of three cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1989, 13, 374–381.
    6. Stern, J.B. Unusual benign bladder tumor of von Brunn nest origin. Urology 1979, 14, 288–289.
    7. Lin, O.; Cardillo, M.; Dalbagni, G.; Linkov, I.; Hutchinson, B.; Reuter, V.E. Nested variant of urothelial carcinoma: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 12 cases. Mod. Pathol. 2003, 16, 1289–1298.
    8. Levy, D.R.; Cheng, L. The expanding molecular and mutational landscape of nested variant of urothelial carcinoma. Histopathology 2020, 76, 638–639.
    9. Shah, T.S.; Kaag, M.; Raman, J.D.; Chan, W.; Tran, T.; Kunchala, S.; Shuman, L.; DeGraff, D.J.; Chen, G.; Warrick, J.I. Clinical significance of prominent retraction clefts in invasive urothelial carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2017, 61, 90–96.
    10. Nassar, H. Carcinomas with micropapillary morphology. Clinical significance and current concepts. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2004, 11, 297–303.
    11. Jin, D.; Jin, K.; Qiu, S.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, Q.; Yang, L.; Wei, Q. Prognostic values of the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A SEER database analysis. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 4897–4906.
    12. Ramalingam, P.; Middleton, L.P.; Tamboli, P.; Troncoso, P.; Silva, E.G.; Ayala, A.G. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast metastatic to the urinary bladder and endometrium: Diagnostic pitfalls and review of the literature of tumors with micropapillary features. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2003, 7, 112–119.
    13. Amin, M.B.; Ro, J.Y.; El-Sharkawy, T.; Lee, K.M.; Troncoso, P.; Silva, E.G.; Ordóñez, N.G.; Ayala, A.G. Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1994, 18, 1224–1232.
    14. Holmäng, S.; Thomsen, J.; Johansson, S.L. Micropapillary carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. J. Urol. 2006, 175, 463–466.
    15. Perez-Montiel, D.; Hes, O.; Michal, M.; Suster, S. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: Clinicopathologic study of five cases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2006, 126, 86–92.
    16. Guo, C.C.; Dadhania, V.; Zhang, L.; Majewski, T.; Bondaruk, J.; Sykulski, M.; Wronowska, W.; Gambin, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; et al. Gene Expression Profile of the Clinically Aggressive Micropapillary Variant of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2016, 70, 211–220.
    17. Zinnall, U.; Weyerer, V.; Compérat, E.; Camparo, P.; Gaisa, N.T.; Knuechel-Clarke, R.; Perren, A.; Lugli, A.; Toma, M.; Baretton, G.; et al. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: Evaluation of HER2 status and immunohistochemical characterization of the molecular subtype. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 80, 55–64.
    18. Yang, Y.; Kaimakliotis, H.Z.; Williamson, S.R.; Koch, M.O.; Huang, K.; Barboza, M.P.; Zhang, S.; Wang, M.; Idrees, M.T.; Grignon, D.J.; et al. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder displays immunophenotypic features of luminal and p53-like subtypes and is not a variant of adenocarcinoma. Urol. Oncol. 2020, 38, 449–458.
    19. Johansson, S.L.; Borghede, G.; Holmäng, S. Micropapillary bladder carcinoma: A clinicopathological study of 20 cases. J. Urol. 1999, 161, 1798–1802.
    20. Tavora, F.; Epstein, J.I. Urothelial carcinoma with abundant myxoid stroma. Hum. Pathol. 2009, 40, 1391–1398.
    21. Gilg, M.M.; Wimmer, B.; Ott, A.; Langner, C. Urothelial carcinoma with abundant myxoid stroma. Evidence for mucinous production by cancer cells. Virchows Arch. 2012, 461, 99–101.
    22. Fei, F.; Li, C.; Cao, Y.; Liu, K.; Du, J.; Gu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S. CK7 expression associates with the location, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and the Dukes’ stage of primary colorectal cancers. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 2510–2519.
    23. Young, R.H.; Oliva, E. Transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder that may be underdiagnosed. A report of four invasive cases exemplifying the homology between neoplastic and non-neoplastic transitional cell lesions. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1996, 20, 1448–1454.
    24. Santi, R.; Angulo, J.C.; Nesi, G.; de Petris, G.; Kuroda, N.; Hes, O.; López, J.I. Common and uncommon features of nephrogenic adenoma revisited. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019, 215, 152561.
    25. Sharifai, N.; Abro, B.; Chen, J.F.; Zhao, M.; He, H.; Cao, D. Napsin A is a highly sensitive marker for nephrogenic adenoma: An immunohistochemical study with a specificity test in genitourinary tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2020, 102, 23–32.
    26. Park, S.; Cho, M.S.; Kim, K.H. A case report of urothelial carcinoma with combined micropapillary and plasmacytoid morphology in the urinary bladder. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016, 44, 124–127.
    27. Sahin, A.A.; Myhre, M.; Ro, J.Y.; Sneige, N.; Dekmezian, R.H.; Ayala, A.G. Plasmacytoid transitional cell carcinoma. Report of a case with initial presentation mimicking multiple myeloma. Acta Cytol. 1991, 35, 277–280.
    28. Kim, D.K.; Kim, J.W.; Ro, J.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Park, J.Y.; Ahn, H.K.; Lee, J.Y.; Cho, K.S. Plasmacytoid variant of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. J. Urol. 2020, 204, 215–223.
    29. Raspollini, M.R.; Sardi, I.; Giunti, L.; Di Lollo, S.; Baroni, G.; Stomaci, N.; Menghetti, I.; Franchi, A. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular analysis of a case series. Hum. Pathol. 2011, 42, 1149–1158.
    30. Kim, B.; Kim, G.; Song, B.; Lee, C.; Park, J.H.; Moon, K.C. HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification in plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Dis. Markers. 2016, 2016, 8463731.
    31. Palsgrove, D.N.; Taheri, D.; Springer, S.U.; Cowan, M.; Guner, G.; Mendoza Rodriguez, M.A.; Rodriguez Pena, M.D.C.; Wang, Y.; Kinde, I.; Cunha, I.; et al. Targeted sequencing of plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma reveals frequent TERT promoter mutations. Hum. Pathol. 2019, 85, 1–9.
    32. Al-Ahmadie, H.A.; Iyer, G.; Lee, B.H.; Scott, S.N.; Mehra, R.; Bagrodia, A.; Jordan, E.J.; Gao, S.P.; Ramirez, R.; Cha, E.K.; et al. Frequent somatic CDH1 loss-of-function mutations in plasmacytoid-variant bladder cancer. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 356–358.
    33. Jin, D.; Qiu, S.; Jin, K.; Zhou, X.; Cao, Q.; Yang, L.; Wei, Q. Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Urinary Bladder Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 653.
    34. Ereño, C.; Gaafar, A.; Garmendia, M.; Etxezarraga, C.; Bilbao, F.J.; Lopez, J.I. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A clinicopathological and follow-up study of 40 cases and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2008, 2, 83–91.
    35. Graham, R.P.; Arnold, C.A.; Naini, B.V.; Lam-Himlin, D.M. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the anus revisited. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 354–360.
    36. Vakar-Lopez, F.; Abrams, J. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma occurring in the urinary bladder. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2000, 124, 455–459.
    37. Hagemann, I.S.; Lu, J.; Lewis, J.S., Jr. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma arising in [corrected] the renal pelvis. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 16, 199–201.
    38. Neves, T.R.; Soares, M.J.; Monteiro, P.G.; Lima, M.S.; Monteiro, H.G. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma in the urinary bladder with small cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, e440–e442.
    39. Ginori, A.; Barone, A.; Santopietro, R.; Barbanti, G.; Cecconi, F.; Tripodi, S.A. Human papillomavirus-related basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder associated with genital tract human papillomavirus infection. Int. J. Urol. 2015, 22, 222–225.