Calmodulin Role in Hemichannel Gating

Subjects: Biochemistry
Created by: Camillo Peracchia

Evidence for the existence of connexin hemichannels was first demonstrated in cultured cells expressing connexin43 by data showing that a fluorescent dye enters the cells when the extracellular calcium concentration is reduced. This was proven by evidence that the membrane resistance significantly drops when the cells are bathed in no-added-Ca2+ solution. Significantly, while external Ca2+ keeps hemichannels closed, an intracellular [Ca2+] rise opens hemichannels. Hemichannel opening is prevented by calmodulin inhibitors, suggesting that calmodulin plays a role in hemichannel gating opposite to that in gap junction channels.

The existence of connexin hemichannels was first proven in cultured cells expressing Cx43 by evidence of 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein influx with lowered [Ca2+] [1]. Hemichannel permeability proved similar to that of gap junction channels and, similarly, hemichannels were sensitive to octanol and heptanol [1]. We further confirmed the presence of hemichannels by demonstrating that the membrane resistance (Rm) of Novikoff hepatoma cells drastically drops with no-added-Ca2+ solutions [1]. In control cells, Rm was lower than in cells transfected with anti-sense Cx43 (~800 and ~4000 MΩ, respectively), proving that the number of open hemichannels in low Ca2+ saline is much lower than in controls [1].

While external Ca2+ clearly plays a major role in keeping hemichannels closed [2, 3], an increase in [Ca2+]i actually causes hemichannel opening [4-6]. In Cx32-expressing cells, a [Ca2+]i rise to ~500 nM, caused by treatment with 2 μM A23187 (a Ca2+ ionophore), triggered ATP release and dye uptake that was blocked by a Cx32 mimetic peptide [4]. Significantly, this peptide (“32gap 24”; GHGDPLHLEEVK, res. 110–121) mimics a CL sequence that just precedes the CaM binding site. Hemichannel opening was prevented by W7 [4], suggesting a CaM role in hemichannel gating that is opposite its role in cell-to-cell channels. A subsequent study confirmed these data on Cx43 hemichannels expressed in glioma cells and primary glial cells [5]. Surprisingly, however, while a [Ca2+]i rise to ~500 nM opened hemichannels, this phenomenon vanished with a greater [Ca2+]i rise. Note, however, that the hemichannel closure at high [Ca2+]i is likely to be CaM-independent [7]. CaM’s role in hemichannel gating has been also reported for Cx50 hemichannels expressed in HeLa cells [8].

The gating mechanism of hemichannels and the role of CaM in hemichannel opening and closure are still poorly understood. A recent study [6] reported that a CT-deleted Cx32 mutant (Cx32–D220) renders hemichannels less sensitive to [Ca2+]i; significantly, Ca2+-sensitivity is restored by application of the peptide “32gap 24”. These Authors suggested that the interaction of “32gap 24” with the Cx32–D220 hemichannel stabilizes CL fluctuations, and proposed that CL fluctuations may prevent the exposure of CL residues to a target domain relevant to gating [6]. In agreement with our “CaM–Cork” gating model [9-11], they believe that Cx32 hemichannels are kept closed at resting [Ca2+]i by a plugging molecule likely to be a CaM lobe [6]. Also consistent with the idea that a CaM lobe plugs the hemichannels (cork gating), is evidence that the hemichannels are opened by positive (depolarizing) voltage pulses [6, 12]. Significantly, Castro and coworkers directly measured the opening and closure of Cx32 hemichannels by patch-clamp in response to a [Ca2+]i rise, hence the kinetics of the hemichannel’s “cork” unplugging [12]. Indeed, based on the CaM–Cork, model the negatively charged CaM lobe is expected to be displaced out of the positively charged hemichannel’s mouth (vestibule) by membrane depolarization caused by positive voltage pulses [9].

A recent study on a Cx46 mutant (G143R) confirmed the direct CaM role in hemichannel gating [13]. The G143R mutation in the CaM-binding site, which increases hemichannel permeability [14], affected CaM binding to CL2 [13]. As predicted, both CaM binding to Cx46’s G143R mutant and increased hemichannel permeability were inhibited by CDZ. Significantly, G143R substitution greatly increases the CaM–Cx46 interaction in the presence and absence of Ca2+ [13], confirming that that CaM is anchored to connexins at normal [Ca2+]i [15, 16]. Perhaps, the enhanced Ca2+–CaM affinity of the G143R mutant is caused by a slight shift in the site toward the COOH-terminus end [9]. The CaM–Cx46 interaction was also confirmed by immunofluorescent CaM–Cx46 co-localization [13].

Recently, Garcia and coworkers reported that the mutation G12R in Cx26’s NT increases the kinetics speed of slow-gate closure and, although the hemichannels still close completely at a very negative Vm, they are not affected by Ca2+, even though Ca2+ still binds [17]. While it might be irrelevant to this phenomenon, it is noteworthy to realize that the G12R mutation reduces the extent of the NT’s CaM-binding site [9]. Another mutation (N14K) [18] decreased the extent of the CaM binding site even more [9]. The N14K mutation raises the energy barrier between open and closed hemichannel states and shifts calcium sensitivity, voltage sensitivity and deactivation time constants [18].

  1. Li, H.; Liu, T. F.; Lazrak, A.; Peracchia, C.; Goldberg, G. S.; Lampe, P. D.; Johnson, R. G., Properties and regulation of gap junctional hemichannels in the plasma membranes of cultured cells. J. Cell Biol 1996, 134, (4), 1019-1030.
  2. Gomez-Hernandez, J. M.; M., d. M.; Larrosa, B.; Gonzalez, D.; Barrio, L. C., Molecular basis of calcium regulation in connexin-32 hemichannels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2003, 100, (26), 16030-16035.
  3. Fasciani, I.; Temperan, A.; Perez-Atencio, L. F.; Escudero, A.; Martinez-Montero, P.; Molano, J.; Gomez-Hernandez, J. M.; Paino, C. L.; Gonzalez-Nieto, D.; Barrio, L. C., Regulation of connexin hemichannel activity by membrane potential and the extracellular calcium in health and disease. Neuropharmacology 2013, 75, 479-490.
  4. De Vuyst, E.; Decrock, E.; Cabooter, L.; Dubyak, G. R.; Naus, C. C.; Evans, W. H.; Leybaert, L., Intracellular calcium changes trigger connexin 32 hemichannel opening. EMBO J 2006, 25, (1), 34-44.
  5. De Vuyst, E.; Wang, N.; Decrock, E.; De, B. M.; Vinken, M.; Van, M. M.; Lai, C.; Culot, M.; Rogiers, V.; Cecchelli, R.; Naus, C. C.; Evans, W. H.; Leybaert, L., Ca(2+) regulation of connexin 43 hemichannels in C6 glioma and glial cells. Cell Calcium 2009, 46, (3), 176-187.
  6. Carrer, A.; Leparulo, A.; Crispino, G.; Ciubotaru, C. D.; Marin, O.; Zonta, F.; Bortolozzi, M., Cx32 hemichannel opening by cytosolic Ca2+ is inhibited by the R220X mutation that causes Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Hum. Mol Genet 2018, 27, (1), 80-94.
  7. Ponsaerts, R.; Wang, N.; Himpens, B.; Leybaert, L.; Bultynck, G., The contractile system as a negative regulator of the connexin 43 hemichannel. Biol. Cell 2012, 104, (7), 367-377.
  8. Zhang, X.; Zou, T.; Liu, Y.; Qi, Y., The gating effect of calmodulin and calcium on the connexin50 hemichannel. Biol. Chem 2006, 387, (5), 595-601.
  9. Peracchia, C., Gap junction structure and chemical regulation. Direct calmodulin role in cell-to-cell channel gating. Academic Press. An imprint of Elsevier: London, UK, 2019.
  10. Peracchia, C., Chemical gating of gap junction channels; roles of calcium, pH and calmodulin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1662, (1-2), 61-80.
  11. Peracchia, C.; Wang, X. C.; Peracchia, L. L., Behavior of chemical and slow voltage-gates of connexin channels. The cork gating hypothesis. In Gap Junctions - Molecular Basis of Cell Comunication in Health and Disease, Peracchia, C., Ed. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000; pp 271-295.
  12. Castro, C.; Gomez-Hernandez, J. M.; Silander, K.; Barrio, L. C., Altered formation of hemichannels and gap junction channels caused by C-terminal connexin-32 mutations. J. Neurosci 1999, 19, (10), 3752-3760.
  13. Hu, Z.; Riquelme, M. A.; Wang, B.; Bugay, V.; Brenner, R.; Gu, S.; Jiang, J. X., Cataract-associated Connexin 46 Mutation Alters Its Interaction with Calmodulin and Function of Hemichannels. J. Biol. Chem 2018, 293, 2573-2585.
  14. Ren, Q.; Riquelme, M. A.; Xu, J.; Yan, X.; Nicholson, B. J.; Gu, S.; Jiang, J. X., Cataract-causing mutation of human connexin 46 impairs gap junction, but increases hemichannel function and cell death. PLoS. One 2013, 8, (9), e74732.
  15. Kerruth, S.; Coates, C.; Rezavi, S. A.; Peracchia, C.; Torok, K., Calmodulin interaction with gap junction intracellular loop peptides. Biophys. J 2018, 114, (3), 468a.
  16. Kerruth, S.; Coates, C.; Rezavi, S. A.; Peracchia, C.; Torok, K., Ca2+-dependent and -independent interaction of calmodulin with gap junction cytplasmic loop peptides. Biochem. J. 2020, submitted.
  17. Garcia, I. E.; Villanelo, F.; Contreras, G. F.; Pupo, A.; Pinto, B. I.; Contreras, J. E.; Perez-Acle, T.; Alvarez, O.; Latorre, R.; Martinez, A. D.; Gonzalez, C., The syndromic deafness mutation G12R impairs fast and slow gating in Cx26 hemichannels. J. Gen. Physiol 2018, 150, 697-711.
  18. Chatterjee, P.; Garcia, I.; Harris, A. L.; Luo, Y.; Contreras, J. E., Insights of gating functions of cytosolic domains of connexin 26 hemichannels revealed by a human pathogenic mutation (N14K). Biophys. J 2018, 114[3].

The article has been published on 10.3390/ijms21020485

Cite this article

Camillo, Peracchia. Calmodulin Role in Hemichannel Gating, Encyclopedia, 2020, v1, Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/518