Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Oncolytic Virotherapy

    Subjects: Oncology
    View times: 51
    Submitted by: Olga Matveeva

    Definition

    Some non-pathogenic viruses that do not cause serious illness in humans can efficiently target and kill cancer cells and may be considered candidates for cancer treatment with virotherapy. However, many cancer cells are protected from viruses. An important goal of personalized cancer treatment is to identify viruses that can kill a certain type of cancer cells. To this end, researchers investigate expression patterns of cell entry receptors, which viruses use to bind to and enter host cells.

    1. Introduction

    Oncolytic viruses are promising new agents for cancer treatment. They can kill cancer cells directly through infection or indirectly through activation of the immune system [1][2]. For the most effective virotherapy, elimination of malignant cells with a combination of both direct and indirect destruction is desirable. Like all viruses, oncolytic viruses use specific receptors to bind to and enter host cells. This review describes the tendency of tumor cells to overexpress certain viral receptors, but it also shows that, to varying degrees, these receptors are also expressed in many normal cells. However, regardless of whether cells are normal or malignant, absence of receptors for a particular virus makes the cells resistant to this virus infection. So, for better identification of individual patients who are most likely to benefit from virotherapy, their tumor cells should be screened for the presence of virus receptors. For many oncolytic viruses, such receptors are well characterized. Thus, simple tests that evaluate protein or RNA levels in tumor tissue could provide information about expression levels of a virus receptor.

    Receptor mediated virus entry into a cell is only the first step in viral infection. Next, the virus must break through the cellular antiviral defense system, which usually effectively protects normal cells from any virus infection. Key players in such protection are interferons (IFNs); they help cells detect the presence of a virus and, in response, restrict proliferation, slow down metabolic processes, and trigger apoptosis [3][4]. However, malignant cells frequently have dysfunctional IFN pathways. Such dysfunction helps them to evade the immune system and survive, thus promoting tumor growth. The same IFN defects that help cancer cells escape immune surveillance make them vulnerable to virus infection [5]. Nevertheless, not all malignant cells have dysfunctional IFN pathways. Some of them can produce and/or respond to IFN signals and protect themselves from a virus infection. So, theoretically, even if a cancer cell had receptors for a particular oncolytic virus it still could be resistant to infection by the virus.

    Some viruses require cells to express processing enzymes that modify or cleave the viral proteins necessary for the formation of mature infectious virions. Thus, fusion protein in paramyxoviruses is synthesized as an inactive precursor and is activated through proteolytic cleavage by the cellular protease. Without such cleavage the virus is unable to sustain infection. For MV, this activating protease is furin [6] and for SeV it can be a number of serine proteases (TPSB2 [7][8][9], PRSS1 [10], PLG [11], F10 [12], and TMPRSS2 [13]). Some of these proteases are overexpressed in cancer cells [14][15][16]. In addition to those listed, the expression levels of other host genes influence vulnerability of cancer cells to a virus infection. Figure 1 illustrates factors necessary for a cell to become vulnerable to paramyxovirus infection.

    Figure 1. Factors influencing cells’ vulnerability to paramyxovirus infection. The host cell needs to (1) express virus receptors (2) have a malfunctioning IFN pathway, (3) express proteases responsible for proteolytic activation of virus fusion rotein, and (4) have other genes that require further identification.

    To predict if a patient is likely to respond to oncolytic virotherapy, testing for the presence of virus receptors in tumor tissue is not sufficient. Additional tests are also needed to reveal the presence of impaired IFN signaling in the patient’s cancer cells, and the expression of virus processing enzymes and yet to be identified other proteins that accommodate virus infection. Currently, such tests are commercially unavailable and need to be developed to optimize patient selection protocols for future clinical trials.

    Oncolytic paramyxoviruses might become powerful anticancer agents [17][18][19]. Figure 2 shows the life cycle of the viruses, which can trigger syncytium (a polykarion) formation that protects virions from host neutralizing antibodies during intratumor virus replication and spreading.

    Figure 2. A visual representation of the cell cycle of measles virus (MV) and Sendai virus (SeV). Both viruses belong to the Paramyxoviridae family, but MV belongs to the Morbillivirus genus and SeV to the Respirovirus genus. The life cycles of MV and SeV are very similar, but there are several important differences. Their attachment to host cells occurs through different cell entry receptors and different viral cell attachment proteins. The MV virus uses an H protein with hemagglutinin activity, while SeV uses the HN protein with hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) activities. In addition to these proteins, the genomes of these viruses encode 5 structural proteins and accessary proteins. The main structural proteins for both viruses are: Nucleoprotein (N), Phosphoprotein (P), Matrix protein (M), Fusion protein (F), and Large Protein (L). The MV genome encodes two non-structural proteins, C and V, [20], while the SeV genome encodes a set of non-structural proteins, collectively referred as C-proteins (C’, C, Y1, Y2, V, W) [21]. Viral replication for MV and SeV follows a negative-stranded RNA virus replication model in which genomic RNA (minus strand) is used as a template to create a copy of positive sense RNA, employing the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase embedded in the virion. The plus RNA is further used as a template for making multiple copies of the minus RNA. The plus RNA is also translated by the host’s ribosomes, producing all viral proteins. Viruses are then assembled from these proteins along with genomic RNA and budded from the host cell. Both MV and SeV can form syncytia by fusing neighboring infected and non-infected cells into a polykayion.

    So, two related processes can occur: Efficient intratumor virus spread and the resulting mass death of malignant cells. In general, oncolytic paramyxoviruses stimulate strong innate and adaptive anticancer immune responses by generating multiple danger signals. They are potent inducers of IFN and other immuno-stimulating cytokines, and they efficiently induce anticancer activity of natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes [18]. Finally, the viruses require proteolytic cleavage of their fusion proteins by cellular serine proteases, which are sometimes overexpressed in cancer cells [14][15][16], and could add an additional level of specificity to viral oncolytic activity. Moreover, the gene that encodes a fusion protein in the paramyxovirus genome can be replaced with a constructed fusion protein that could be processed by tumor-associated matrix metalloproteases.

    2. Measles Virus as an Oncolytic Agent

    MV (Box 1, Figure 3) causes a highly contagious disease transmitted by respiratory aerosols that can trigger severe immunosuppression and even immune amnesia.

    Figure 3. Schematic representation of the MV genome (A), virion (B) and host cell entry receptors (C). The RNA genome (gRNA) contains six transcription units that codes 6 main structural proteins: nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), fusion protein (F), hemagglutinin (H), and large protein (L) RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). The viral genome also codes the nonstructural V and C proteins, which are antagonists of host innate immunity. The transcription units for each structural gene are separated by non-transcribed trinucleotide intergenic sequences and together are flanked by short leader and trailer sequences containing the genomic promoter (on the minus strand) and the antigenomic promoter (on the plus strand). Inside the virion, genomic RNA forms a complex with N, L, and P proteins. The virus is enveloped by a lipid membrane that has glycoproteins H and F associated with it as virion surface proteins. These proteins coordinate how the virus finds cells and enters them. For H protein, three receptors have been identified: Complement regulatory molecule CD46, the cell adhesion molecule nectin-4 and the signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM). MV wild-type strains use SLAM and nectin-4 as cell entry receptors. Vaccine strains and a small fraction of wild type strains, in addition, use CD46 as a cell entry receptor.

    Box 1. Measles Virus (MV).

    • Taxonomy: The virus belongs to the genus Morbillivirus within the family Paramyxoviridae [22][23].
    • Host: Human
    • Origin: Most likely MV originated from a virus of non-human species.
    • Genome: MV has a single-stranded, negative-sense, non-segmented RNA genome that is ~16K nucleotides long.
    • Virion: MV is an enveloped virus with a lipid membrane.
    • Proteins: Nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), fusion protein (F), hemagglutinin (H), large protein (L), and two nonstructural proteins C and V. Protein C is translated from the same mRNA as the P protein but using an alternative start codon in an overlapping ORF. Protein V is translated from an edited P mRNA.

    Significant efforts by virologists in the second half of the 20th century were focused on finding a safe and effective vaccine against MV. In 1954, one MV isolated strain, when passaged in cell culture, gradually lost its pathogenicity, and became attenuated. From this attenuated variant of the virus, one of the first vaccine strain (Edmonston, denoted in the following text as MV-Edm) was obtained. Further passages of MV-Edm generated the more attenuated Schwarz and Moraten strains, which are still in use for vaccination against measles [23][24].

    During the 20th century clinicians reported on isolated cases where measles disease relieved or caused remission of certain malignancies. Reports include descriptions of the regression of a number of hematological malignancies that took place after MV infection (reviewed in [25]). At the end of the century, virologists and oncologists started to investigate oncolytic properties of attenuated MV strains that are incapable of causing serious infection.

    MV-Edm and its derivatives were the primary strains tested as oncolytic agents [26][27]. These strains can infect and kill a wide variety of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. They are currently being investigated preclinically and in clinical trials for treatment of a large spectrum of malignancies, including ovarian, breast, head and neck cancers, as well as glioblastoma, multiple myeloma, mesothelioma, and T-cell lymphoma [26][27]. A virus with oncolytic properties can be delivered not only locally intratumorally, but also systemically, including by intraperitoneal and intravenous injection routes. In some trials patients survival compared favorably with that of historical controls and the side effects of the virotherapy were mainly mild [26][27].

    3. Sendai virus as an oncolytic agent

    Sendai virus (SeV) causes respiratory infections in mice and other rodents (Box 2). However, it is not associated with any human disease and can be a safe oncolytic agent. Safety of SeV for humans, including small children, has been confirmed experimentally. The virus in the form of nasal drops has been tested as a vaccine against human parainfluenza virus type 1, which causes respiratory symptoms in humans. Testing in adults and children demonstrated that experimental administration of wild type SeV triggered production of neutralizing antibodies towards human parainfluenza virus type 1 and was well tolerated [28][29]. SeV showed an excellent safety profile in a clinical trial [30].

    Box 2. Sendai Virus (SeV)

    • Taxonomy: The virus belongs to the genus Respirovirus within the family Paramyxoviridae [31].
    • Host: The virus causes respiratory infections in mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, rats, and other rodents [32].
    • Genome: SeV has single-stranded, negative-sense, non-segmented RNA genome that is 15,384 nucleotides long [33].
    • Virion: SeV is an enveloped virus with a lipid membrane.
    • Proteins: Nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), fusion protein (F), hemagglutinin-neuraminidase‎ (HN), large protein (L), and two nonstructural proteins C and V that are translated from an alternative RNA transcript of the P gene [33].

    Wild-type SeV can infect a large spectrum of malignant cells ex vivo [34]. A pilot study demonstrated that some canine (dog) cancers such as mastocytomas can be eradicated with the help of SeV injections [35]. However, the virus is infectious for laboratory rodents. Therefore, for studying SeV oncolytic properties in a rodent model, a set of viral constructs that are nonpathogenic for experimental mice was created. They were tested in animals bearing a variety of human xenograft tumors including sarcoma, melanoma, pancreas, colon, hepatocellular and prostate carcinomas. The SeV constructs promoted growth suppression or even complete tumor eradication of these malignancies [36][37][38][39], and elimination of established brain tumors [40].

    In addition, UV- inactivated SeV virions have immune-stimulating properties: in animal model and they promote tumor regression of colon [41][42], bladder [43] and kidney [44] cancers. Other animal models these virions contribute to the eradication of human prostate cancer [45]

    Oncolytic mechanism of Sendai virus action is discussed in detail in a number of publications [46][47][48].

    So far, SeV has not been widely tested in clinical settings. An attempt to treat one case of human leukemia with a set of viruses, including SeV, was undertaken in 1964 at the Clinical Research Center of University Hospitals of Cleveland. Short-term remission in one patient affected by acute leukemia was observed after intravenous virus injection [49]. A few patients affected by various malignancies were treated with intradermally or intratumorally injected SeV in Moscow (Russia) in the 1990s. In a small fraction of patients treated with the virus, primary tumors and metastases disappeared, even when virotherapy was a monotherapy. These patients experienced a pronounced long-term remission that sometimes lasted more than 5-10 years [50].

    4. Conclusions

    The cell entry receptors of oncolytic paramyxoviruses are represented by different types of molecules. They are proteins for measles virus and sialylated proteins or glycans for Sendai virus.The molecules that serve as viral receptors for these viruses have extremely variable expression patterns in malignancies. A reliable predictive model for categorization of tumor cells according to their susceptibility to oncolytic virus infection requires many input parameters, which include but are not limited to expression patterns of viral receptors. Most likely, gene signatures of several immune-related genes such as IRGs and certain type II transmembrane serine proteases may serve as useful input parameters for predictive models. The creation and verification of a multi-parameter predictive model should have measurable therapeutic benefits for oncolytic virotherapy.

    The entry is from 10.3390/cancers12123659

    References

    1. Kaufman, H.L.; Kohlhapp, F.J.; Zloza, A. Oncolytic viruses: A new class of immunotherapy drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 642–662.
    2. Marelli, G.; Howells, A.; Lemoine, N.R.; Wang, Y. Oncolytic Viral Therapy and the Immune System: A Double-Edged Sword Against Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 866.
    3. Stetson, D.B.; Medzhitov, R. Antiviral defense: Interferons and beyond. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1837–1841.
    4. Negishi, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Yanai, H. The Interferon (IFN) Class of Cytokines and the IFN Regulatory Factor (IRF) Transcription Factor Family. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017.
    5. Katsoulidis, E.; Kaur, S.; Platanias, L.C. Deregulation of interferon signaling in malignant cells. Pharmaceuticals 2010, 3, 406–418.
    6. Watanabe, M.; Hirano, A.; Stenglein, S.; Nelson, J.; Thomas, G.; Wong, T.C. Engineered serine protease inhibitor prevents furin-catalyzed activation of the fusion glycoprotein and production of infectious measles virus. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 3206–3210.
    7. Tashiro, M.; Yokogoshi, Y.; Tobita, K.; Seto, J.T.; Rott, R.; Kido, H. Tryptase Clara, an activating protease for Sendai virus in rat lungs, is involved in pneumopathogenicity. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 7211–7216.
    8. Kido, H.; Niwa, Y.; Beppu, Y.; Towatari, T. Cellular proteases involved in the pathogenicity of enveloped animal viruses, human immunodeficiency virus, influenza virus A and Sendai virus. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 1996, 36, 325–347.
    9. Chen, Y.; Shiota, M.; Ohuchi, M.; Towatari, T.; Tashiro, J.; Murakami, M.; Yano, M.; Yang, B.; Kido, H. Mast cell tryptase from pig lungs triggers infection by pneumotropic Sendai and influenza A viruses. Purification and characterization. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 3189–3197.
    10. Le, T.Q.; Kawachi, M.; Yamada, H.; Shiota, M.; Okumura, Y.; Kido, H. Identification of trypsin I as a candidate for influenza A virus and Sendai virus envelope glycoprotein processing protease in rat brain. Biol. Chem. 2006, 387, 467–475.
    11. Murakami, M.; Towatari, T.; Ohuchi, M.; Shiota, M.; Akao, M.; Okumura, Y.; Parry, M.A.; Kido, H. Mini-plasmin found in the epithelial cells of bronchioles triggers infection by broad-spectrum influenza A viruses and Sendai virus. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 2847–2855.
    12. Ogasawara, T.; Gotoh, B.; Suzuki, H.; Asaka, J.; Shimokata, K.; Rott, R.; Nagai, Y. Expression of factor X and its significance for the determination of paramyxovirus tropism in the chick embryo. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 467–472.
    13. Abe, M.; Tahara, M.; Sakai, K.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kanou, K.; Shirato, K.; Kawase, M.; Noda, M.; Kimura, H.; Matsuyama, S.; et al. TMPRSS2 is an activating protease for respiratory parainfluenza viruses. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 11930–11935.
    14. Uhlen, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallstrom, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, A.; Kampf, C.; Sjostedt, E.; Asplund, A.; et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419.
    15. Uhlen, M.; Zhang, C.; Lee, S.; Sjostedt, E.; Fagerberg, L.; Bidkhori, G.; Benfeitas, R.; Arif, M.; Liu, Z.; Edfors, F.; et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 2017, 357.
    16. The Human Protein Atlas. Available online: https://www.proteinatlas.org/ (accessed on 20 June 2018).
    17. Matveeva, O.V.; Kochneva, G.V.; Netesov, S.V.; Onikienko, S.B.; Chumakov, P.M. Mechanisms of Oncolysis by Paramyxovirus Sendai. Acta Naturae 2015, 7, 6–16.
    18. Matveeva, O.V.; Guo, Z.S.; Shabalina, S.A.; Chumakov, P.M. Oncolysis by paramyxoviruses: Multiple mechanisms contribute to therapeutic efficiency. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2015, 2, 15011.
    19. Matveeva, O.V.; Guo, Z.S.; Senin, V.M.; Senina, A.V.; Shabalina, S.A.; Chumakov, P.M. Oncolysis by paramyxoviruses: Preclinical and clinical studies. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2015, 2, 15017.
    20. Jiang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Chen, M. Host-Pathogen Interactions in Measles Virus Replication and Anti-Viral Immunity. Viruses 2016, 8, 308.
    21. Faisca, P.; Desmecht, D. Sendai virus, the mouse parainfluenza type 1: A longstanding pathogen that remains up-to-date. Res. Vet. Sci. 2007, 82, 115–125.
    22. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Available online: https://talk.ictvonline.org/ (accessed on 25 June 2019).
    23. Griffin, D.E. Measles Virus. In Fields Virology, 6th ed.; Knipe, D.M., Howley, P.M., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 1042–1069.
    24. Baldo, A.; Galanis, E.; Tangy, F.; Herman, P. Biosafety considerations for attenuated measles virus vectors used in virotherapy and vaccination. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2016, 12, 1102–1116.
    25. Msaouel, P.; Opyrchal, M.; Domingo Musibay, E.; Galanis, E. Oncolytic measles virus strains as novel anticancer agents. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2013, 6, 6.
    26. Aref, S.; Bailey, K.; Fielding, A. Measles to the Rescue: A Review of Oncolytic Measles Virus. Viruses 2016, 8, 294.
    27. Msaouel, P.; Opyrchal, M.; Dispenzieri, A.; Peng, K.W.; Federspiel, M.J.; Russell, S.J.; Galanis, E. Clinical Trials with Oncolytic Measles Virus: Current Status and Future Prospects. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2018, 18, 177–187.
    28. Slobod, K.S.; Shenep, J.L.; Lujan-Zilbermann, J.; Allison, K.; Brown, B.; Scroggs, R.A.; Portner, A.; Coleclough, C.; Hurwitz, J.L. Safety and immunogenicity of intranasal murine parainfluenza virus type 1 (Sendai virus) in healthy human adults. Vaccine 2004, 22, 3182–3186.
    29. Adderson, E.; Branum, K.; Sealy, R.E.; Jones, B.G.; Surman, S.L.; Penkert, R.; Freiden, P.; Slobod, K.S.; Gaur, A.H.; Hayden, R.T.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal Sendai virus-based human parainfluenza virus type 1 vaccine in 3- to 6-year-old children. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2015, 22, 298–303.
    30. Muhlebach, M.D.; Mateo, M.; Sinn, P.L.; Prufer, S.; Uhlig, K.M.; Leonard, V.H.; Navaratnarajah, C.K.; Frenzke, M.; Wong, X.X.; Sawatsky, B.; et al. Adherens junction protein nectin-4 is the epithelial receptor for measles virus. Nature 2011, 2, 530–533.
    31. Noyce, R.S.; Bondre, D.G.; Ha, M.N.; Lin, L.T.; Sisson, G.; Tsao, M.S.; Richardson, C.D. Tumor cell marker PVRL4 (nectin 4) is an epithelial cell receptor for measles virus. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002240.
    32. Noyce, R.S.; Richardson, C.D. Nectin 4 is the epithelial cell receptor for measles virus. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 429–439.
    33. Dorig, R.E.; Marcil, A.; Chopra, A.; Richardson, C.D. The human CD46 molecule is a receptor for measles virus (Edmonston strain). Cell 1993, 75, 295–305.
    34. Naniche, D.; Varior-Krishnan, G.; Cervoni, F.; Wild, T.F.; Rossi, B.; Rabourdin-Combe, C.; Gerlier, D. Human membrane cofactor protein (CD46) acts as a cellular receptor for measles virus. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 6025–6032.
    35. Wang, N.; Morra, M.; Wu, C.; Gullo, C.; Howie, D.; Coyle, T.; Engel, P.; Terhorst, C. CD150 is a member of a family of genes that encode glycoproteins on the surface of hematopoietic cells. Immunogenetics 2001, 53, 382–394.
    36. Sintes, J.; Romero, X.; Marin, P.; Terhorst, C.; Engel, P. Differential expression of CD150 (SLAM) family receptors by human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 2008, 36, 1199–1204.
    37. De Salort, J.; Sintes, J.; Llinas, L.; Matesanz-Isabel, J.; Engel, P. Expression of SLAM (CD150) cell-surface receptors on human B-cell subsets: From pro-B to plasma cells. Immunol. Lett. 2011, 134, 129–136.
    38. Maciejczyk, A.; Szelachowska, J.; Szynglarewicz, B.; Szulc, R.; Szulc, A.; Wysocka, T.; Jagoda, E.; Lage, H.; Surowiak, P. CD46 Expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor in breast cancer cases. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2011, 19, 540–546.
    39. Fabre-Lafay, S.; Monville, F.; Garrido-Urbani, S.; Berruyer-Pouyet, C.; Ginestier, C.; Reymond, N.; Finetti, P.; Sauvan, R.; Adelaide, J.; Geneix, J.; et al. Nectin-4 is a new histological and serological tumor associated marker for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2007, 7, 73.
    40. Athanassiadou, A.M.; Patsouris, E.; Tsipis, A.; Gonidi, M.; Athanassiadou, P. The significance of Survivin and Nectin-4 expression in the prognosis of breast carcinoma. Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica 2011, 49, 26–33.
    41. Lattanzio, R.; Ghasemi, R.; Brancati, F.; Sorda, R.L.; Tinari, N.; Perracchio, L.; Iacobelli, S.; Mottolese, M.; Natali, P.G.; Piantelli, M. Membranous Nectin-4 expression is a risk factor for distant relapse of T1-T2, N0 luminal-A early breast cancer. Oncogenesis 2014, 3, e118.
    42. Rajc, J.; Gugic, D.; Frohlich, I.; Marjanovic, K.; Dumencic, B. Prognostic role of Nectin-4 expression in luminal B (HER2 negative) breast cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2017, 213, 1102–1108.
    43. Erlenhofer, C.; Duprex, W.P.; Rima, B.K.; ter Meulen, V.; Schneider-Schaulies, J. Analysis of receptor (CD46, CD150) usage by measles virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2002, 83, 1431–1436.
    44. Delpeut, S.; Sisson, G.; Black, K.M.; Richardson, C.D. Measles Virus Enters Breast and Colon Cancer Cell Lines through a PVRL4-Mediated Macropinocytosis Pathway. J. Virol. 2017, 91.
    45. Papatheodorou, I.; Fonseca, N.A.; Keays, M.; Tang, Y.A.; Barrera, E.; Bazant, W.; Burke, M.; Fullgrabe, A.; Fuentes, A.M.; George, N.; et al. Expression Atlas: Gene and protein expression across multiple studies and organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D246–D251.
    46. Allen, C.; Opyrchal, M.; Aderca, I.; Schroeder, M.A.; Sarkaria, J.N.; Domingo, E.; Federspiel, M.J.; Galanis, E. Oncolytic measles virus strains have significant antitumor activity against glioma stem cells. Gene Ther. 2012, 20, 444–449.
    47. Ma, J.; Sheng, Z.; Lv, Y.; Liu, W.; Yao, Q.; Pan, T.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Xu, G. Expression and clinical significance of Nectin-4 in hepatocellular carcinoma. OncoTargets Ther. 2016, 9, 183–190.
    48. Takano, A.; Ishikawa, N.; Nishino, R.; Masuda, K.; Yasui, W.; Inai, K.; Nishimura, H.; Ito, H.; Nakayama, H.; Miyagi, Y.; et al. Identification of nectin-4 oncoprotein as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6694–6703.
    49. Sakuma, T.; Kodama, K.; Hara, T.; Eshita, Y.; Shibata, N.; Matsumoto, M.; Seya, T.; Mori, Y. Levels of complement regulatory molecules in lung cancer: Disappearance of the D17 epitope of CD55 in small-cell carcinoma. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1993, 84, 753–759.
    50. Senina, A.; Matveeva, O.; Senin, V. Method for Cancer Immunotherapy and Pharmaceutical Compositions Based on Oncolytic Non-Pathogenic Sendai Virus. US Patent 9526779, 27 December 2016.
    More