Topic review

Wastewater Treatment by Catalytic Wet Peroxidation

Subjects: Chemical Engineering View times: 216
Created by: Carmen Rodrigues

Nowadays, there is an increasing interest in the development of promising, efficient, and environmentally friendly wastewater treatment technologies. Among them are the advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), in particular, catalytic wet peroxidation (CWPO), assisted or not by radiation. One of the challenges for the industrial application of this process is the development of stable and efficient catalysts, without leaching of the metal to the aqueous phase during the treatment. Gold catalysts, in particular, have attracted much attention from researchers because they show these characteristics. Recently, numerous studies have been reported in the literature regarding the preparation of gold catalysts supported on various supports and testing their catalytic performance in the treatment of real wastewaters or model pollutants by CWPO. This review summarizes this research; the properties of such catalysts and their expected effects on the overall efficiency of the CWPO process, together with a description of the effect of operational variables (such as pH, temperature, oxidant concentration, catalyst, and gold content). In addition, an overview is given of the main technical issues of this process aiming at its industrial application, namely the possibility of using the catalyst in continuous flow reactors. Such considerations will provide useful information for a faster and more effective analysis and optimization of the CWPO process.

The world’s population growth and increasing industrial development led to the intense usage of natural resources with the water bodies being used as a final destination for wastewater containing pollutants [1][2][3]. The discharge of untreated wastewater introduces persistent contaminants into the environment, some examples being metals, organic, and inorganic compounds [4][5][6], which have harmful effects on ecology and public health [7].

In an attempt to minimize the impacts of effluent discharges, the European Union Water Framework Directive (EU-WFD), in 2000, imposed maximum permissible values for ecotoxic or possibly ecotoxic substances [8]. Thus, it is mandatory to adopt practical, efficient, and low-cost effluent purification technologies [9][10], which will allow the complete elimination or, at least, reduction of the contaminants concentration up to the limit values imposed by legislation [10][11], before wastewaters are discharged into water bodies.

The wastewaters can be treated by physical-chemical processes, such as sedimentation, coagulation/flocculation, filtration, adsorption, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, or chemical precipitation [12][13], by biological degradation [13][14][15], and/or by conventional oxidative processes, which degrade the pollutant by the action of oxygen or other oxidants, such as hydrogen peroxide, ozone, and permanganate [16][17][18]. Physical-chemical processes are not very appealing because the pollutants are concentrated at another phase, which requires a subsequent treatment [10]. Biological degradation, although economically advantageous, is inefficient since the compounds present in effluents are very often toxic and/or non-biodegradable [19][20]. Moreover, conventional oxidative processes might not have enough capacity to completely oxidize refractory compounds with high chemical stability and, therefore, there is a high risk of intermediate products being formed during oxidation, which can be even more toxic than the initial ones [21][22][23].

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are emergent and attractive treatment technologies to degrade compounds with high chemical stability, toxicity, and non-biodegradability [10][24]. AOPs generate the hydroxyl radical (HO), responsible for oxidizing refractory organic compounds into non-toxic products, such as CO2 and H2O [10][25][26][27]. Given the high efficiency of the hydroxyl radical, the AOPs have been widely used, not only in wastewater treatment [9][19][28][29][30], but also in soil and sediment remediation [31][32], decontamination of gaseous effluents containing volatile organic compounds and elimination of odors [33][34][35][36], water and groundwater treatment [37][38][39], and conditioning of municipal sludge [40][41].

Several AOPs are available, as will be detailed in the next section, that use different oxidants, with or without catalysts, in the presence of absence of radiation. Herein, we will focus on the catalytic wet peroxidation (CWPO) process using nano gold-based catalysts for wastewater treatment. This process presents several advantages compared to other AOPs, namely: it uses environmentally friendly reagents, does not require sophisticated equipment, and is operated under mild conditions of pressure and temperature. Moreover, catalysis by gold presents additional advantages, such as non-leaching of the metal to the treated effluent and efficient and stable performance, which are important for industrial applications.

A survey of the catalyst properties, operating conditions, and their effect on the efficiency of the process will be discussed. To the best of the authors knowledge, such review has not yet been reported in the literature.


  1. Guang-Ming Zeng; Xue Li; Jinhui Huang; Chang Zhang; Chun-Fei Zhou; Jing Niu; Liang-Jing Shi; Song-Bao He; Fei Li; Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium and methylene blue in synthetic wastewater using SDS. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011, 185, 1304-1310, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.046.
  2. Andy Cundy; Laurence Hopkinson; Raymond Whitby; Use of iron-based technologies in contaminated land and groundwater remediation: A review. Science of The Total Environment 2008, 400, 42-51, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.002.
  3. Meng Nan Chong; Bo Jin; Christopher Chow; Chris Saint; Christopher Saint; Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review. Water Research 2010, 44, 2997-3027, 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039.
  4. George A. O'connor; Organic compounds in sludge-amended soils and their potential for uptake by crop plants. Science of The Total Environment 1996, 185, 71-81, 10.1016/0048-9697(95)05043-4.
  5. Xue Li; Guang-Ming Zeng; Jinhui Huang; Ng-Mei Zhang; Liang-Jing Shi; Song-Bao He; Min Ruan; Simultaneous removal of cadmium ions and phenol with MEUF using SDS and mixed surfactants. Desalination 2011, 276, 136-141, 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.041.
  6. Despo Fatta-Kassinos; I.K. Kalavrouziotis; P.H. Koukoulakis; Marlen Vasquez; The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Science of The Total Environment 2011, 409, 3555-3563, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.036.
  7. Piao Xu; Cheng-Gang Niu; Danlian Huang; Chong Ling Feng; Shuang Hu; Mei Hua Zhao; Cui Lai; Zhen Wei; Chao Huang; Geng Xin Xie; et al. Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: A review. Science of The Total Environment 2012, 424, 1-10, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.023.
  8. European Parliament & Council. Water Framework Directive 2000/60/ce; European Parliament & Counci: Brussels, Belgium, 2000; pp. 1–73.
  9. Mehmet A. Oturan; Jean-Jacques Aaron; Advanced Oxidation Processes in Water/Wastewater Treatment: Principles and Applications. A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2014, 44, 2577-2641, 10.1080/10643389.2013.829765.
  10. Alok D. Bokare; Wonyong Choi; Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2014, 275, 121-135, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.054.
  11. Parag R Gogate; A.B. Pandit; A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Advances in Environmental Research 2004, 8, 501-551, 10.1016/s1093-0191(03)00032-7.
  12. Seow, T.W.; Lim, C.K.; Norb, M.H.M.; Mubarak, M.F.M.; Lam, C.Y.L.; Yahya, A.; Ibrahim, Z; Review on wastewater treatment technologies. Int. J. Appl. Environ. Sci. 2016, 11, 111–126, .
  13. Ramalho, R.S. Introduction to Wastewater Treatment Processes; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  14. Deepak Pant; Alok Adholeya; Biological approaches for treatment of distillery wastewater: A review. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98, 2321-2334, 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.027.
  15. B. Demirel; Orhan Yenigun; Turgut T. Onay; Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review. Process Biochemistry 2005, 40, 2583-2595, 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.12.015.
  16. Saul Wolfe; Christopher F. Ingold; Oxidation of organic compounds by zinc permanganate. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1983, 105, 7755-7757, 10.1021/ja00364a054.
  17. Xiang-Rong Xu; Hua-Bin Li; Wen-Hua Wang; Ji-Dong Gu; Decolorization of dyes and textile wastewater by potassium permanganate. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 893-898, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.013.
  18. L. Calvosa; A. Monteverdi; B. Rindone; G. Riva; Ozone oxidation of compounds resistant to biological degradation. Water Research 1991, 25, 985-993, 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90148-j.
  19. Stasinakis, A.S; Use of selected advanced oxidation processes (aops) for wastewater treatment—A mini review. Glob. NEST J. 2008, 10, 376-385, .
  20. Nuri Azbar; T. Yonar; K. Kestioglu; Comparison of various advanced oxidation processes and chemical treatment methods for COD and color removal from a polyester and acetate fiber dyeing effluent. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 35-43, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.046.
  21. Philippe Lamarche; Ronald L. Droste; Air-Stripping Mass Transfer Correlations for Volatile Organics. Journal - American Water Works Association 1989, 81, 78-89, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1989.tb03326.x.
  22. Guido Busca; Silvia Berardinelli; Carlo Resini; Laura Arrighi; Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: A short review of recent developments. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 160, 265-288, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.045.
  23. Roberto Andreozzi; Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery. Catalysis Today 1999, 53, 51-59, 10.1016/s0920-5861(99)00102-9.
  24. José Manuel Poyatos; M. M. Muñio; M. C. Almecija; J. C. Torres; E. Hontoria; F. Osorio; Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment: State of the Art. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 2010, 205, 187-204, 10.1007/s11270-009-0065-1.
  25. Marcel Skoumal; Pere Lluís Cabot; Francesc Centellas; Conchita Arias; Rosa Maria Rodríguez; José Antonio Garrido; Enric Brillas; Mineralization of paracetamol by ozonation catalyzed with Fe2+, Cu2+ and UVA light. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2006, 66, 228-240, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.03.016.
  26. E Rosenfeldt; Pei-Jen Chen; S Kullman; Karl G. Linden; Destruction of estrogenic activity in water using UV advanced oxidation. Science of The Total Environment 2007, 377, 105-113, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.096.
  27. Fritz Haber; Joseph Weiss; The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by iron salts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1934, 147, 332-351, 10.1098/rspa.1934.0221.
  28. Naresh Mahamuni; Yusuf G. Adewuyi; Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: A review with emphasis on cost estimation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2010, 17, 990-1003, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005.
  29. J. Herney-Ramirez; M.A. Vicente; Luis M. Madeira; Heterogeneous photo-Fenton oxidation with pillared clay-based catalysts for wastewater treatment: A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2010, 98, 10-26, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.004.
  30. Esteves, B.M.; Rodrigues, C.S.D.; Madeira, L.M. Wastewater treatment by heterogeneous Fenton-like processes in continuous reactors. In Applications of Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Drinking Water Treatment; Gil, A., Galeano, L.A., Vicente, M.Á., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 211–255.
  31. Joanna Pawłat; Henryka Danuta Stryczewska; Kenji Ebihara; Sterilization Techniques for Soil Remediation and Agriculture Based on Ozone and AOP. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies 2010, 13, 138–145, 10.1515/jaots-2010-0201.
  32. Vanina Flotron; Corine Delteil; Yann Padellec; Valérie Camel; Removal of sorbed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil, sludge and sediment samples using the Fenton’s reagent process. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 1427-1437, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.065.
  33. Masahiro Tokumura; Rina Nakajima; Hussein Znad; Yoshinori Kawase; Chemical absorption process for degradation of VOC gas using heterogeneous gas–liquid photocatalytic oxidation: Toluene degradation by photo-Fenton reaction. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 768-775, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.021.
  34. Gaoyuan Liu; Jian Ji; Haibao Huang; Ruijie Xie; Qiuyu Feng; Yajie Shu; Yujie Zhan; Ruimei Fang; Miao He; Shuilian Liu; et al. UV/H 2 O 2 : An efficient aqueous advanced oxidation process for VOCs removal. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017, 324, 44-50, 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.105.
  35. Celia Domeño; Angel Rodriguez Lafuente; Jm Martos; Rafael Bilbao; Cristina Nerín; Cristina Nerín; VOC Removal and Deodorization of Effluent Gases from an Industrial Plant by Photo-Oxidation, Chemical Oxidation, and Ozonization. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44, 2585-2591, 10.1021/es902735g.
  36. Masahiro Tokumura; Mai Shibusawa; Yoshinori Kawase; Dynamic simulation of degradation of toluene in waste gas by the photo-Fenton reaction in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering Science 2013, 100, 212-224, 10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.010.
  37. RamN Toor; Madjid Mohseni; UV-H2O2 based AOP and its integration with biological activated carbon treatment for DBP reduction in drinking water. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 2087-2095, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.043.
  38. Mark A. Shannon; Paul W. Bohn; Menachem Elimelech; John G. Georgiadis; Benito J. Mariñas; Anne M. Mayes; Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452, 301-310, 10.1038/nature06599.
  39. Christos Comninellis; Agnieszka Kapalka; Sixto Malato; Simon A Parsons; Ioannis Poulios; Dionissios Mantzavinos; Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 2008, 83, 769-776, 10.1002/jctb.1873.
  40. Fares A. Al Momani; Potential use of solar energy for waste activated sludge treatment. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 2013, 6, 82-91, 10.1080/19397038.2012.672480.
  41. Krzemieniewski, M.; Dębowski, M.; Janczukowicz, W.; Pesta, J. Effect of sludge conditioning by chemical methods with magnetic field application. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2003, 12, 595–605.