Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Art-sRNAi for Enhanced Antiviral Resistance

    Subjects: Plant Sciences
    View times: 168


    Artificial small RNAs (art-sRNAs) are 21-nucleotide small RNAs designed to recognize and silence complementary target RNAs with high specificity. Art-sRNA-based RNAi (art-sRNAi) tools are extensively used in gene function studies or for improving crops. In particular, numerous studies have reported the successful application of art-sRNAi tools to induce resistance against a large number of RNA and DNA viruses in model and crop species. However, the application of art-sRNAi as an antiviral tool has limitations, such as the difficulty to predict the efficacy of a particular art-sRNA, or the emergence of virus variants with mutated target sites escaping to art-sRNA-mediated degradation. Here, we describe the different classes, features and recent uses of art-sRNAi tools to induce enhanced antiviral resistance in plants. 

     1. Introduction

    RNA interference (RNAi) is a biological process conserved in most eukaryotes and characterized by the sequence-specific degradation of target RNA by complementary small RNAs (sRNAs) [1]. RNAi pathways are triggered by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) processed into sRNA duplexes by Dicer ribonucleases [1][2]. One of the strands of the duplex is preferentially loaded into an ARGONAUTE (AGO) protein, and the resulting complex termed RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) recognizes and silences complementary target RNA through diverse mechanisms [3][4].

    In plants, RNAi tools based on the expression of dsRNAs of viral sequence have been extensively used to confer antiviral resistance, despite their lack of high specificity. Artificial sRNAs (art-sRNAs) were developed to overcome this limitation. They consist in 21-nucleotide sRNAs expressed in planta from endogenous sRNA precursors and computationally designed to silence target RNAs with high specificity [5].  

    2. Classes and features of art-sRNAs

    The two main classes of plant art-sRNAs are artificial microRNAs (amiRNAs) and artificial/synthetic trans-acting small interfering RNAs (atasiRNAs/syn-tasiRNAs, hereafter syn-tasiRNAs) [5]. Despite differing in their biogenesis pathway (see below), both classes of art-sRNAs function similarly by associating with AGO1 to specifically silence target RNAs through endonucleolytic cleavage or translation repression (Figure 1). 

    Figure 1. Antiviral art-sRNA pathways in plants. (a) The antiviral amiRNA pathway. The amiRNA transgene expresses a monocistronic MIRNA precursor sequentially processed into an amiRNA targeting a single site in a single viral RNA. (b) The antiviral syn-tasiRNA pathway. The syn-tasiRNA transgene expresses a polycistronic TAS precursor sequentially processed into four different syn-tasiRNAs targeting multiple sites in multiple viral RNAs. Both amiRNA and syn-tasiRNA guide strands associated with AGO1 to silence viral RNAs through endonucleolytic cleavage or translational inhibition.

    - amiRNAs

    AmiRNAs are produced in planta by expressing amiRNA transgenes containing a functional plant MIRNA precursor in which the endogenous miRNA guide/miRNA star sequences are substituted by the amiRNA guide/amiRNA star sequences (Figure 1a) [5][6]. Importantly, other sequences of the precursor are modified to preserve the original secondary structure required for accurate Dicer-like 1 (DCL1) processing. The amiRNA transgene is transcribed to produce the amiRNA primary transcript (pri-amiRNA). Sequential processing by DCL1 produces the pre-amiRNA followed by the amiRNA duplex, and the amiRNA guide strand is incorporated into AGO1 to target complementary viral RNA, typically in a single site (Figure 1a).

    - syn-tasiRNAs

    Syn-tasiRNAs are produced in planta by expressing syn-tasiRNA transgenes containing a functional TAS precursor in which a subset of the endogenous tasiRNA sequences is substituted by one or several syn-tasiRNA sequences in tandem (Figure 1b) [5][7]. The syn-tasiRNA transgene is transcribed to produce the syn-tasiRNA primary transcript (pri-syn-tasiRNA) which is cleaved by a miRNA/AGO complex. One of the cleaved products is used by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) as a template to synthesize dsRNA that is sequentially processed by DCL4 into phased syn-tasiRNA duplexes in 21-nucleotide registered with the miRNA cleavage site.

    3. Recent uses of art-sRNAi for enhanced antiviral resistance

    Identification of Efective Art-sRNAs with High Antiviral Activity

    The antiviral activity of a particular art-sRNA is difficult to predict a priori, therefore systems for the rapid screening of the antiviral activity of large numbers of art-sRNAs are needed in order to avoid the time-consuming generation of stably transformed plants. Recently, a systematic and high-throughput methodology for the simple and fast-forward design, generation, and functional analysis of large numbers of art-sRNA constructs has been described [8]. Briefly, highly specific antiviral amiRNAs are designed with the P-SAMS web tool [9], and selected amiRNA candidate sequences are cloned into BsaI/ccdB “B/c” vectors [10], a new generation of vectors for one-step amiRNA cloning and efficient gene silencing in plants [11]. Each amiRNA construct is transiently expressed in several N. benthamiana plants, which are subsequently inoculated with the virus of interest. The antiviral activity of each amiRNA construct is assessed by  monitoring viral symptom appearance, and through molecular analysis of virus accumulation in plant tissues. This methodology was successfully applied to identify highly effective amiRNAs against RNAs of Potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd) [12] and Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) [13] in N. benthamiana.

    Another possibility is to develop methods that allow for the identification of immunologically effective small interfering RNAs (esiRNAs). These molecules are generated by DCLs from viral dsRNAs, produced during viral replication [14]. Because the majority of virus-derived sRNAs are ineffective against the producing virus, it has been difficult to distinguish esiRNAs reliably and efficiently. However an attractive methodology has risen up, based on an in vitro system of cytoplasmic extracts from N. tabacum BY-2 protoplasts expressing Tomato bush stunt virus (TBSV) dsRNAs and selected AGO members, for the identification of TBSV-derived esiRNAs [14]. It was based on three steps: i) 21-nucleotide sRNAs derived from TBSV dsRNAs and loaded by AGO1 or AGO2, were immunoprecipitated followed by sRNA sequencing; ii) the catalytic efficiency was assayed in in vitro cleavage assays; and iii) the protective activity of several of these esiRNAs was evaluated by agroinfiltration of each sRNA as an amiRNA in N. benthamiana, and subsequently inoculating TBSV in the same leaf-sites. Results indicated that the functionality of esiRNAs mainly depended on the binding affinity to AGO proteins and the ability to target RNA [14]. Thus, this methodology could be attractive to identify naturally occurring virus-derived sRNAs that are efficient in silencing viral RNAs.

     Co-Expression of Multiple Art-sRNAs for Viral RNA Multi-Targeting.

    The success in inducing antiviral resistance by the in vivo co-expression of multiple antiviral amiRNAs, through different strategies (Figure 2), has been proven effective in several plant/virus pathosystems (see Table 1 in [15]).  

    Figure 2. Strategies for the co-expression of multiple art-sRNAs in plants. Multiple amiRNAs are generated from several monocistronic precursors expressed in trans, from a single monocistronic precursor in tandem repeats, from multiple monocistronic precursors in tandem or from a single polycistronic precursor. Multiple syn-tasiRNAs are generated from a single polycistronic TAS precursor. Other details are as in Figure 1.

    On the other hand, TAS precursors possess a “natural” multiplexing capability allowing the insertion of multiple syn-tasiRNAs in a single construct. Indeed, this type of strategy has been already applied and resulted in high levels of resistance against PSTVd and TSWV in N. benthamiana and S. lycopersicum plants, respectively [16][12].

    4. Application of art-sRNAs to control viral diseases in crops

    Transgenes producing antiviral art-sRNAs from endogenous sRNA precursors have been introduced in diverse crop species to generate antiviral resistance. Regarding amiRNAs, transgenic tomato plants expressing amiRNAs against Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) [17], Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV) [18], or Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) [16] were resistant, as were barley, maize, rice, and wheat transgenic plants expressing amiRNAs against Wheat dwarf virus (WDV) [19], Rice black-streaked dwarf virus (RBSDV) [20], Rice black-streaked dwarf virus/Rice stripe virus (RBSDV/RSV) [21], and Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) [22], respectively. Regarding syn-tasiRNAs, the recent development of highly resistant transgenic tomato plants expressing four different syn-tasiRNAs against TSWV is the only example reported [16]. However any of these transgenic crops have been evaluated under field conditions. An imperative requirement to ensure that the antiviral resistance can last for multiple generations, which appear as necessary before the approval of a transgenic crop for its commercial release.

    An alternative to the transgenic expression of antiviral RNAs is their topical delivery into plants. This approach was first used to interfere with Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), TEV, or Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) infection by mechanically co-inoculating N. tabacum leaves with naked dsRNAs of virus sequence and their corresponding target virus [23]. Later, the same strategy was also applied successfully to interfere with the infection of several viroids [24]. Since these early works, dsRNAs of viral sequence have been delivered to plants through diverse methods to induce resistance against a large number of plant viruses in multiple model and crop species (reviewed recently in  [25][26][27][28].

    To date, the exogenous application of art-sRNAs to plants, has not been reported. Most likely this is due to the difficulties that need to be faced, like the lack of efficient production and delivery methods. In this context, several bacterial systems for the efficient production of recombinant RNAs [29][30][31][32] may be used to produce large amounts of art-sRNA precursors in a time- and cost- effective manner. In addition, a possibility to increase the stability and efficient delivery of art-sRNA precursors could be their conjugation to cationic nanoparticles, clay nanosheets, surfactants, or peptide-based RNA delivery systems, as described for other RNAs [26]. For example, sprayed dsRNAs bound to layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanosheets have been successfully used to confer resistance to PMMoV and CMV in N. tabacum [33], in a non-toxic and sustainable manner, and extend the durability of the protection described in previous studies [23]. Thus, the exogenous application of art-sRNA precursors conjugated to new generation nanoparticles may represent a novel, highly efficient, and sustainable strategy to induce antiviral resistance in crops in a GMO-free manner.

    5. Conclusion

    We anticipate that art-sRNAi tools will be broadly used to confer antiviral resistance in plants because of their unique features of high simplicity, specificity, and efficacy, as well as for their multiplexing capability and for the availability of high-throughput methodologies for the design, generation, and validation of art-sRNAi constructs. The development of efficient methodologies for the production and topical delivery to plants of art-sRNA precursors, as well as a better knowledge of the basic mechanisms governing art-sRNA biogenesis, mode of action, and viral targeting, are needed to further refine art-sRNAi tools in view of their broader use for enhanced crop protection.

    The entry is from 10.3390/plants9060669


    1. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C.; Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806-811, .
    2. Bernstein, E.; Caudy, A.A.; Hammond, S.M.; Hannon, G.J.; Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature 2001, 409, 363–366 2001, 409, 363-366, .
    3. Hammond, S.M.; Boettcher, S.; Caudy, A.A.; Kobayashi, R.; Hannon, G.J.; Argonaute2, a link between genetic and biochemical analyses of RNA. Science 2001, 23, 1146–1150, .
    4. Hammond, S.M.; Bernstein, E.; Beach, D.; Hannon, G.J.; An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature 2000, 404, 293–296, .
    5. Carbonell, A.. Artificial small RNA-based strategies for e ective and specific gene silencing in plants. In Plant Gene Silencing: Mechanisms and Applications; Dalmay, T., Eds.; CABI publishing: Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK, 2017; pp. pp. 110–127.
    6. Ossowski, S.; Schwab, R.; Weigel, D.; Gene silencing in plants using artificial microRNAs and other small RNAs. . Plant J. For. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 53, 674–690, .
    7. Zhang,Z.J.; Artificial trans-acting small interferingRNA:Atool for plant biology study and crop improvements.. Planta 2014, 239 , 1139–1146, .
    8. Carbonell, A.; Daròs, J.-A.; Design, Synthesis, and Functional Analysis of Highly Specific Artificial Small RNAs with Antiviral Activity in Plants.. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 2028, 231–246. 2019, 2028, 231-246, .
    9. Fahlgren, N.; Hill, S.T.; Carrington, J.C.; Carbonell, A.; P-SAMS: A web site for plant artificial microRNA and synthetic trans-acting small interfering RNA design.. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 157-158, .
    10. Carbonell, A.; Secondary Small Interfering RNA-Based Silencing Tools in Plants: An Update.. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 687, .
    11. Carbonell, A.; Takeda, A.; Fahlgren, N.; Johnson, S.C.; Cuperus, J.T.; Carrington, J.C.; New generation of artificial MicroRNA and synthetic trans-acting small interfering RNA vectors for ecient gene silencing in Arabidopsis.. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 15–29. 2014, 165, 15–29, .
    12. Carbonell, A.; Daròs, J.-A.; Artificial microRNAs and synthetic trans-acting small interfering RNAs interfere with viroid infection. . Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 187, 746-753, .
    13. Carbonell, A.; Lopez, C.; Daròs, J.-A.; Fast-Forward Identification of Highly E ective Artificial Small RNAs Against Different Tomato spotted wilt virus Isolates.. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 142-156, .
    14. Gago-Zachert, S.; Schuck, J.; Weinholdt, C.; Knoblich, M.; Pantaleo, V.; Grosse, I.; Gursinsky, T.; Behrens, S.-E.; Highly efficacious antiviral protection of plants by small interfering RNAs identified in vitro.. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 9343–9357, .
    15. Cisneros, A. E.; Carbonell, A.; Artificial Small RNA-Based Silencing Tools for Antiviral Resistance in Plants. Plants 2020, 9, 669, .
    16. Carbonell, A.; Lisón, P.; Daròs, J.-A.; Multi-targeting of viralRNAs with synthetic trans-acting small interfering RNAs enhances plant antiviral resistance.. Plant J. 2019, 100, 720–737, .
    17. Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Gong, P.; Ziaf, K.; Xiao, F.; Ye, Z.; Expression of artificial microRNAs in tomato confers ecient and stable virus resistance in a cell-autonomous manner. . Transgenic Res. 2011, 20, 569–581 , .
    18. Vu, T.V.; Choudhury, N.R.; Mukherjee, S.K.; Transgenic tomato plants expressing artificial microRNAs for silencing the pre-coat and coat proteins of a begomovirus, Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, show tolerance to virus infection. . Virus Res. 2013, 172, 35–45, .
    19. Kis, A.; Tholt, G.; Ivanics, M.; Varallyay, E.; Jenes, B.; Havelda, Z.; Polycistronic artificial miRNA-mediated resistance to Wheat dwarf virus in barley is highly effcient at low temperature.. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 427–437, .
    20. Xuan, N.; Zhao, C.; Peng, Z.; Chen, G.; Bian, F.; Lian, M.; Liu, G.; Wang, X.; Bi, Y.; Development of transgenic maize with anti-rough dwarf virus artificial miRNA vector and their disease resistance. . Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 1375–1386, .
    21. Sun, L.; Lin, C.; Du, J.; Song, Y.; Jiang, M.; Liu, H.; Zhou, S.; Wen, F.; Zhu, C.; Dimeric artificial microRNAs mediate high resistance to RSV and RBSDV in transgenic rice plants. . Plant Cell Tiss Organ. Cult. 2016, 126, 1-13, .
    22. Fahim, M.; Millar, A.A.; Wood, C.C.; Larkin, P.J.; Resistance to Wheat streak mosaic virus generated by expression of an artificial polycistronic microRNA in wheat. . Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 150–163, .
    23. Tenllado, F.; Diaz-Ruiz, J.R.; Double-stranded RNA-mediated interference with plant virus infection. . J. Virol. 2001, 75, 12288–12297. 2001, 75, 12288–12297 , .
    24. Carbonell, A.; Martinez de Alba, A.E.; Flores, R.; Gago, S.; Double-stranded RNA interferes in a sequence-specific manner with the infection of representative members of the two viroid families. . Virology 2008, 371, 44-53, .
    25. Dalakouras, A.; Wassenegger, M.; Dadami, E.; Ganopoulos, I.; Pappas, M.L.; Genetically Modified Organism-Free RNA Interference: Exogenous Application of RNA Molecules in Plants. . Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 38–50, .
    26. Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V.; Exogenous RNAs for Gene Regulation and Plant Resistance. . Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2282, .
    27. Kim, H.; Shimura, H.; Masuta, C.; Advancing toward commercial application of RNA silencing-based strategies to protect plants from viral diseases. . J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2019, 85, 321–328, .
    28. Mitter, N.; Worrall, E.A.; Robinson, K.E.; Xu, Z.P.; Carroll, B.J.; Induction of virus resistance by exogenous application of double-stranded RNA.. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2017, 26, 49-55, .
    29. Tenllado, F.; Llave, C.; Diaz-Ruiz, J.R.; RNA interference as a new biotechnological tool for the control of virus diseases in plants. . Virus Res. 2004, 102, 85–96 , .
    30. Daros, J.A.; Aragones, V.; Cordero, T.; A viroid-derived system to produce large amounts of recombinant RNA in Escherichia coli. . Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1904, .
    31. Yin, G.; Sun, Z.; Liu, N.; Zhang, L.; Song, Y.; Zhu, C.; Wen, F.; Production of double-stranded RNA for interference with TMV infection utilizing a bacterial prokaryotic expression system.. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 323-333, .
    32. Niehl, A.; Soininen, M.; Poranen, M.M.; Heinlein, M.; Synthetic biology approach for plant protection using dsRNA. . Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1679–1687, .
    33. Mitter, N.; Worrall, E.A.; Robinson, K.E.; Li, P.; Jain, R.G.; Taochy, C.; Fletcher, S.J.; Carroll, B.J.; Lu, G.Q.; Xu, Z.P.; et al. Clay nanosheets for topical delivery of RNAi for sustained protection against plant viruses.. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 16207, .