1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Pyrolysis Technology

    Subjects: Energy & Fuels
    View times: 9
    Submitted by:

    Definition

    Pyrolysis technology is a thermo-chemical route for converting biomass to many useful products (biochar, bio-oil, and combustible pyrolysis gases). The composition and relative product yield depend on the pyrolysis technology adopted. 

    1. Introduction

    Pyrolysis is an established thermochemical process for converting biomass materials into bio-oil, gaseous products, and liquid fuel. The process can be categorized into slow, fast, and flash pyrolysis [1]. Each pyrolysis type has different products and their corresponding compositions [2].
    Pyrolysis occurs in an inert atmosphere by applying thermal heat to change biomass into numerous fuels, such as char, gas, and liquid oils. The liquid fuel is a combination of dozens of oxygenated organic compounds [3]. Multiple products are formed depending on the various operation conditions, such as the rate of heating, operating temperature, residence time, and biomass particle size [4]. The amounts of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, which are leading polymers of biomass, also contribute to the composition of the final products [5]. Compared to thermochemical conversion processes, such as combustion and gasification, pyrolysis occurs at moderately lower temperatures (400–600 °C) and is generally preferable because the pyrolysis products, mainly char and liquid fuels, are easy to store and transport [6].
    Considerable research has been conducted into the pyrolysis of different materials, including biomass and, most recently, e-waste materials such as electronics scrap components. Pyrolysis has numerous advantages as compared to other thermochemical conversion processes, such as [7]:
    1. It is a simpler and relatively cheaper conversion process.
    2. Pyrolysis is suitable for a wider variety of feedstock.
    3. It reduces the landfill requirements and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
    4. It has very little water pollution potential.
    5. Pyrolysis reactor construction is relatively rapid process.
    Pyrolysis efficiency is the thermal efficiency obtained as the ratio of the difference between the overall heating values of the pyrolytic products and the total thermal energy utilized for processing the sample. Pyrolysis is a well-known process of producing high energy-density biofuels and chemicals [8]. Wang et al. [9] presented a comprehensive overview of the pyrolysis mechanisms of three biopolymers in biomass materials and highlighted the complexities in their structure. Sharma et al. [10] conducted a critical review of pyrolysis modeling to highlight the gaps in the technology and explore new opportunities for integrating biomass pyrolysis models of disparate scales. Kan et al. [11] published a comprehensive review of the pyrolysis product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. They reported that the heating rate and temperature are the main influential parameters affecting the pyrolysis yield and quality. Dai et al. [12] published a review on understanding the chemistry of non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis processes. They introduced recent progress on producing value-added hydrocarbons, phenols, anhydrosugars, and nitrogen-containing compounds from the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass over zeolites and metal oxides via different reaction pathways. The pyrolyzer reactor in the biomass pyrolysis process is the primary component used to convert biomass into valuable products. Several review papers on the biomass pyrolysis process are available, but the authors found few studies on the scope of biomass pyrolyzers. Most review papers on biomass pyrolysis presented experimental and modeling studies in general. Few articles explained the characterization of the products (bio-oil and bio-char). There are also review papers available on the pyrolysis process parameters, the catalyst used in the reactions, and the upgradation of products. Garcia-Nunez [13] presented a study of different reactors used in biomass pyrolysis, and the review paper presented the pyrolysis technologies from a historical perspective.

    2. Future Perspective and Commercialization of Pyrolysis Technology

    The pyrolysis economics and environmental constraints will be optimized further to produce more valuable products and enhanced pyrolysis process efficiencies. Pyrolysis production technology towards more demanding products and increasing process efficiencies have been linked mainly to the reactor configuration and feedstock logistics [14]. Another way to fulfill this goal is to use different catalysts to maximize the conversions and improve the yield quality [15]. Another emerging solution to add more value to the pyrolysis technology products is converting bio-oil into crude oil. Crude oil is in much more demand and can be integrated easily into the present commercial fuel market. Similarly, bio-oil to transportation fuel is another research area that can help expand the scope of pyrolysis products [16]. Some models have been presented and tested to overcome the issues related to feedstock logistics. For example, mobile pyrolysis units near the feedstock location eliminate feedstock handling and transportation charges. With this arrangement, multiple feedstocks can be processed [17]. On the other hand, the fruitful results depend mainly on the suitable selection and configuration of the pyrolysis reactor. Not all feedstock materials can be processed with the same pyrolysis technology. The desired product and yield can determine the correct choice of pyrolysis technique that needs to be adopted. The following research areas need to be considered to improve the pyrolysis reactor configuration further [18][19]:
    1. Pyrolysis reactors should be efficient and effective in heat transfer,
    2. Should speed up the reactivity of pyrolysis,
    3. Produce bio-oil with a lower molecular weight,
    4. Pyrolysis products should have zero toxicity,
    5. Thermally stable pyrolysis reactors,
    6. Less ash agglomeration in reactor beds, and
    7. Should have good control over temperature and heating rates.
    The magnitude of greenhouse gases (GHG) released from the pyrolysis processes is very small compared to conventional fuels. Nevertheless, there is a research scope to expand the environmental benefits further because pyrolysis is an emerging technology with the benefits of using multiple feedstocks [20]. Above all, the most valuable benefit is the production of a wide range of fuels. Hence, a comprehensive assessment of the pyrolysis process is required to highlight the gaps and direct the research in potential progress areas. Table 1 presents an overview of the life cycle global warming potential (GWP) for various feedstock. GWP is the best approach for analyzing the effects of pyrolysis on the environment and its contribution to global warming. The positive and negative values of GWP represent the increase and decrease in emissions, respectively. Biochar used for soil remediation has better global warming potential than using pyrolysis products for energy applications. Table 2 lists some commercially installed pyrolysis reactors.
    Table 1. Life cycle global warming potential (GWP) of some pyrolysis products.
    Feedstock Reactor Plant Capacity Ton/Year Product Yield L/DT Application GWP Ref.
    Corn stover Rotary kiln 84,000 - Soil amendment −865 [21]
    Barley straw Rotary kiln 100,000 - Soil amendment −900 [22]
    Sewage sludge - 2000 - Energy generation −750 [23]
    Poplar wood Fluidized bed - 300 Gasoline and diesel 0.74 [24]
    Forest residue Hydroprocessing - 350 Gasoline 1.21 [25]
    Forest residue Fluidized bed - 114 Chemicals −0.53 [26]
    Wood residue Fluidized bed - 320 Bio-oil 0.11 [27]
    Table 2. Some commercially installed pyrolysis reactors.
    Technology Location No. of Units Max. Size Kg/h
    a Fixed-bed and moving-bed Anhui Yineng Bioenergy Ltd., China 3 600
    a Vacuum pyrolysis Pyrovac, Canada 1 3500
    a Ablative reactor PyTec, Germany 2 250
    a Rotating cone BTG, Netherlands 4 2000
    a Circulating fluidized bed Metso/UPM, Finland 1 400
    a Fluidized-bed RTI, Canada 5 20
    b Transported fluidized-bed Ensyn, Canada 8 4000
    b Bubbling fluidized-bed Dynamotive, Canada 1 3800
    b Indirect heating rotary kiln Mitsubishi Heavy Industries 1 4000
    b Rotary cone BTG, Malaysia 1 2000
    b Heated kiln pyrolysis followed by gasification Choren, Germany 1 6800
    c Fluidized bed Phrae, Thailand 1 10–20
    a = [28], b = [11], c = [29].

    3. Conclusions

    Pyrolysis is a promising technology for altering biomass into more valuable renewable energy. The process can deliver sustainable and green energy to meet domestic, industrial, and commercial needs. This review conveys a summary of current efforts and developments as well as the environmental and economic features of this energy conversion technology. In pyrolysis, less-valued biomass material is transformed into high-value biochar, bio-oil, and combustible gases. The perspective to decrease the growth of greenhouse gases (GHG) from pyrolysis depends on several factors, such as the type of biomass feedstock used, type of pyrolysis conversion technology, the scope of the pyrolysis unit, and the way co-products are recycled. Slow pyrolysis can deliver superior ecological outcomes as it yields additional biochar that can be applied to soil to sequester carbon. Fast pyrolysis has financial benefits through the production of bio-oil, which is a higher-value product. Advanced pyrolysis processes can also provide high welfare for specific applications. The success of pyrolysis can be determined by the biomass feedstock prices, product yields, aptitude to produce advanced value products, and production balance. Table 3 summarizes the detailed advantages and disadvantages of different pyrolysis reactors. Furthermore, the current review paper also highlights important research gaps in the pyrolysis process using different types of pyrolyzers. The implementation of artificial intelligence will be a breakthrough in the field of the pyrolysis process. Hybrid energy systems using biomass pyrolysis processes with other renewable energy sources are needed to explore cost-effective and energy-efficient processes. The integration of pyrolysis reactors with other biomass conversion technologies can help enhance the product yields.
    Table 3. Advantages, disadvantages, and bio-oil yield range of various pyrolysis reactors.
    Reactor Type Advantages Disadvantages Oil Yield
    Fixed-bed Simple and reliable design Biomass size dependent Long residence time Difficult to remove char 35–50%
    Bubbling fluidized-bed Simple design and easy operation Suitable for large scale Small particle sizes are needed 70–75%
    Circulating fluidized-bed Good temp. control Large particle size could be used Suitable for small scale Complex hydrodynamics 70–75%
    Rotating cone No carrier gas required Less wear Complex process Small particle 65%
    Vacuum Produce clean oil Can process large particle (3–5 cm) No carrier gas required Slow process Solid residence time is too high 65%
    Ablative Inert gas is not required Large particle sizes can be processed Reactor is costly Low reaction rate 70%
    PyRos Compact and low cost High heat transfer Short gas residence time Complex design High impurities in the oil High temp. required 70–75%
    Microwave High heating rates Large size biomass can be processed High temperature High electrical power consumption High operating costs 60–70%

    This entry is adapted from 10.3390/su131911061

    References

    1. Jaroenkhasemmeesuk, C.; Diego, M.E.; Tippayawong, N.; Ingham, D.B.; Pourkashanian, M. Simulation analysis of the catalytic cracking process of biomass pyrolysis oil with mixed catalysts: Optimization using the simplex lattice design. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 2983–2996.
    2. Ruiz, J.A.; Juárez, M.C.; Morales, M.P.; Muñoz, P.; Mendívil, M.A. Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 18, 174–183.
    3. Hidayat, S.; Bakar, M.S.A.; Ahmed, A.; Iryani, D.A.; Hussain, M.; Jamil, F.; Park, Y.K. Comprehensive kinetic study of Imperata Cylindrica pyrolysis via Asym2sig deconvolution and combined kinetics. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 156, 105133.
    4. Goyal, H.B.; Seal, D.; Saxena, R.C. Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 504–517.
    5. Van de Velden, M.; Baeyens, J.; Brems, A.; Janssens, B.; Dewil, R. Fundamentals, kinetics and endothermicity of the biomass pyrolysis reaction. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 232–242.
    6. Adibah, W.; Azwar, E.; Fong, S.; Ahmed, A.; Peng, W.; Tabatabaei, M.; Aghbashlo, M.; Park, Y.; Lam, S.S. Valorization of municipal wastes using co-pyrolysis for green energy production, energy security, and environmental sustainability: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 129749.
    7. What Is Pyrolysis? Available online: https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=336 (accessed on 17 January 2021).
    8. Weldekidan, H.; Strezov, V.; He, J.; Kumar, R.; Asumadu-Sarkodie, S.; Doyi, I.N.; Jahan, S.; Kan, T.; Town, G. Energy conversion efficiency of pyrolysis of chicken litter and rice husk biomass. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 6509–6514.
    9. Wang, S.; Dai, G.; Yang, H.; Luo, Z. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: A state-of-the-art review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2017, 62, 33–86.
    10. Sharma, A.; Pareek, V.; Zhang, D. Biomass pyrolysis—A review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 1081–1096.
    11. Kan, T.; Strezov, V.; Evans, T.J. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 1126–1140.
    12. Dai, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; He, C.; Ruan, R.; Yu, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Wu, Q. A review on selective production of value-added chemicals via catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 749, 142386.
    13. Garcia-Nunez, J.A.; Pelaez-Samaniego, M.R.; Garcia-Perez, M.E.; Fonts, I.; Abrego, J.; Westerhof, R.J.M.; Garcia-Perez, M. Historical Developments of Pyrolysis Reactors: A Review. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 5751–5775.
    14. Brown, D.; Rowe, A.; Wild, P. A techno-economic analysis of using mobile distributed pyrolysis facilities to deliver a forest residue resource. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 150, 367–376.
    15. French, R.; Czernik, S. Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for biofuels production. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 25–32.
    16. Laird, D.A.; Brown, R.C.; Amonette, J.E.; Lehmann, J. Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2009, 3, 547–562.
    17. Crombie, K.; Mašek, O. Investigating the potential for a self-sustaining slow pyrolysis system under varying operating conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 162, 148–156.
    18. Iwasaki, T.; Suzuki, S.; Kojima, T. Influence of biomass pyrolysis temperature, heating rate and type of biomass on produced char in a fluidized bed reactor. Energy Environ. Res. 2014, 4, 64.
    19. Burton, A.; Wu, H. Mechanistic investigation into bed agglomeration during biomass fast pyrolysis in a fluidized-bed reactor. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 6979–6987.
    20. Coulson, M.; Bridgwater, A. Fast pyrolysis of annually harvested crops for bioenergy applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Biomass, Rome, Italy, 10–14 May 2004; pp. 1098–1101.
    21. Roberts, K.G.; Gloy, B.A.; Joseph, S.; Scott, N.R.; Lehmann, J. Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: Estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 827–833.
    22. Hammond, J.; Shackley, S.; Sohi, S.; Brownsort, P. Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 2646–2655.
    23. Ibarrola, R.; Shackley, S.; Hammond, J. Pyrolysis biochar systems for recovering biodegradable materials: A life cycle carbon assessment. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 859–868.
    24. Snowden-Swan, L.J.; Male, J.L. Summary of Fast Pyrolysis and Upgrading GHG Analyses; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL): Richland, WA, USA, 2012.
    25. Hsu, D.D. Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 45, 41–47.
    26. Wang, L.; Dong, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, G.; Zhang, M. Ordered mesoporous carbon supported ferric sulfate: A novel catalyst for the esterification of free fatty acids in waste cooking oil. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 128, 10–16.
    27. Fan, J.; Kalnes, T.N.; Alward, M.; Klinger, J.; Sadehvandi, A.; Shonnard, D.R. Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 632–641.
    28. Bridgwater, A.V. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 38, 68–94.
    29. Jaroenkhasemmeesuk, C.; Tippayawong, N. Technical and Economic Analysis of A Biomass Pyrolysis Plant. Energy Procedia 2015, 79, 950–955.
    More