Digitalisation of organisations and COVID-19
Edit

The COVID-19 pandemic caused profound shifts in the functioning of organisations, with the increased mobilisation of the implementation of digitalisation processes in the activities of the members of these coordinated collective units. In this perspective, based on our academic experience and recent literature, this paper offers some dimensions that seem to us relevant to ponder with special urgency, and that will shape both organisations in the near future and an organisational culture that is, in many cases, renewed.

Digitalization of organizations Society 5.0 COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic Sustainable development

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-virus 2) at the end of 2019, affected both the representations and the social practices of the vast majority of the world population[1][2]. The protection measures implemented by most people worldwide, such as the physical distance between individuals (wrongly called “social distance”) and the promotion of digital work carried out from home, whenever possible, have had profound influences on all dimensions of human life, namely in the social, economic, personal and collective spheres. This situation affects, albeit unevenly, all social classes and also entails the attainment of digital skills[1][3][4][5] (Billy, 2020; Sá & Serpa, 2020; Santos & Serpa, 2017, 2020).

All these and other protection measures have caused profound shifts in the functioning of organisations [6][7](Anggraini, 2020; Putrivi, 2020), with the increased mobilisation of the implementation of digitalisation processes in the activities of the members of these coordinated collective units. This prospective short communication, based on our academic experience and recent literature, puts forth some dimensions that seem to us relevant to ponder with special urgency, and that will shape organisations in the near future[8](Serpa, Ferreira, & Santos, 2020).

2. COVID-19 and the promotion of digitalisation of organisations

The context described above shaped the development of digitalisation processes in the functioning of organisations[9] (Putrivi, 2020), viewed as coordinated collective units that, being open to the external environment, fulfil the most diverse purposes. Thus, in social, healthcare, educational, economic, industrial, business, financial, tourist, military and other organisations, the interaction established between its members in the structuring processes of the required procedures is, in several situations, different than it was in the pre- COVID-19 pandemic. The mobilisation of digital instruments communicated to other members of the organisation, notably the use of email, videoconferences, digital signature, the use of the most diverse software adequate to the accomplishment of a given task, has experienced exponential growth.

This unexpected situation has created, then, the opportunity to accelerate the process of digitalisation of societies, which could seem somewhat utopian. An example is the promotion of Society 5.0 as a possible future result of the mobilisation of digitalisation in the most varied dimensions of the social, creating a Smart Society through the materialisation of the potential of the individual-technology[10][11] (Gladden, 2019; Ferreira & Serpa, 2018). This process should always be aware that organisations, in addition to the inherent diversities, are disparate in their potential to shape a digital transformation in their functioning[12] (Jasmine, 2020). The author sustains that

Virtual teams are a new type of task-performing group that is emerging in the time of the dynamic organization. Virtual teams – teams composed of individuals who are located in different places, different time zones, and sometimes, different organizations for the explicit purpose of bringing together people who might not otherwise be able to collaborate[12] (Jasmine, 2020, p. 4).

Hence, organisations are unavoidable as one of the critical elements in this social and economic digitalisation, which poses profound challenges. In a specific example on the creative field, Putrivi (2020)[7] argues that “the creative industries really should keep operating and working while adapting to the dynamic organization working style and demand their employees or workers to learn how to adapt quickly and turn their mindset to be more agile. By doing that, the creative industries will likely to survive this 2020 global pandemic".

The digitalisation of organisations is vital to their success in this new context. As Billy (2020)[1] advocates, “today’s dynamic organization must be a fast and flexible problem solver, able to diagnose problems, process data, produce effective solutions, and gather the resources needed to implement these solutions quickly and efficiently” (p. 2). This will tend to increase interdisciplinarity between different scientific areas, such as organisational culture, communications, organisational behaviour, human resources, and conflict[1][8] (Billy, 2020; Serpa, & Ferreira, 2019).

Any prospective analysis has its limits, but it seems crucial to us to study the impact of the implementation of digital technology on organisations [1](Billy, 2020), to reach the heuristic apprehension of the intended sustainable development[7] (Serpa, & Ferreira, 2020). This adds to the reduction of indeterminacy and uncertainty of this process in the promotion of social, economic e environmental sustainability in a digital society[12](Serpa & Ferreira, 2019), also via the digitalisation of organisations.

References

  1. Billy, M. (2020). The influence of dynamic organizations and the application of digital innovations to educational institutions in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3588233
  2. Serpa, S., Ferreira, C. M., & Santos, A. I. (2020). Personal Argumention in the Scholarly Publication. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0021
  3. Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2020). Literacy: Promoting sustainability in a digital society. Journal of Education, Teaching and Social Studies, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22158/jetss.v2n1p1
  4. Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2017). The importance of promoting digital literacy in higher education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(6), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i6.2330
  5. Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2020). The global crisis brought about by SARS-CoV-2 and its impacts on education: An overview of the Portuguese panorama. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 5(2), 525-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565613
  6. Anggraini, F. (2020). How dynamic organizations overcame the impact of COVID-19 on industry in Indonesia (April 9, 2020). SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590861
  7. Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2020). Sustainability and Digital as Challenges of Sociology. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(2), 15.23. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0023
  8. Serpa, S., Ferreira, C. M., & Santos, A. I. (2020). Personal Argumention in the Scholarly Publication. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0021
  9. Putrivi, N. (2020). How digital innovation and dynamic organization concept can help creative industries to survive COVID-19 global pandemic. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590926
  10. Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Society 5.0 and social development: Contributions to a discussion. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(4), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v5n4p26
  11. Jasmine, C. A. (2020). Impacts of Covid-19 on company and efforts to support organization adaptable. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590726
  12. Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). Society 5.0 and sustainability digital innovations: A social process. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflicts, 23(1), 1-14. Available at https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Society-5.0-and-Sustainability-Digital-Innovations-A-Social-Process-1939-4691-23-1-129.pdf
More
Related Content
(1) Background: Since the 1990s, theses and dissertations—a key part of scientific communication—have evolved significantly with advances in information and communication technologies. (2) Methods: This study reviews 99 publications examining these changes, drawing insights from international conferences and empirical studies in the field. (3) Results: Historically, a major challenge in managing PhD theses has been the shift to electronic formats, resulting in the creation of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). This shift involves four main tasks: adopting new digital formats, updating institutional workflows between departments, graduate schools, and academic libraries, implementing updated bibliographic standards (such as metadata and identifiers), and utilizing new tools and channels for distribution. With open science becoming a widespread research policy across many countries and institutions, ensuring open access for ETDs is an added challenge—though a substantial portion of ETD content remains restricted to institutional or library networks. Today, ETD management is on the brink of a new era, with advancements in data-driven science and artificial intelligence. (4) Conclusions: The development of ETDs varies significantly across different countries, regions, and institutions due to technological, organizational, and legal differences. It is essential for academic libraries and other stakeholders to address the challenges identified while considering these variations.
Keywords: electronic theses and dissertations; digitization; open access; institutional repositories; research data; metadata; artificial intelligence; academic libraries; higher education institutions; library and information science
The evolving landscape of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has transcended its traditional boundaries, transitioning into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles and their more advanced iteration, ESG 2.0. Unlike traditional CSR, which primarily emphasizes voluntary ethical practices, ESG integrates sustainability into the core business strategy, transforming how corporations address environmental and societal challenges while enhancing shareholder value. This entry focuses specifically on the European and North American contexts, where regulatory pressures, investor demands, and societal expectations have played pivotal roles in accelerating this transition. Understanding the evolution from CSR to ESG practices is crucial, given the increasing complexity of global challenges such as climate change, inequality, and governance scandals. The emphasis on ESG 2.0 highlights a proactive, strategic approach to embedding sustainability into corporate DNA, ensuring relevance in a rapidly changing world.
Keywords: ESG; CSR; sustainability; accountability; stakeholder theory
This study aims to develop a multifaceted conceptual basis for employee collaboration with regard to promoting organizational sustainability, which encompasses environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Employing a mixed-methods framework, the study integrates a thorough literature review with a qualitative content analysis. A distinctive feature of this investigation is its emphasis on incorporating collaborative methodologies into sustainability strategies across various organizational frameworks, illustrating how collaboration can be refined through adaptive leadership, interdisciplinary teams, and digital technologies. The results indicate that organizations characterized by a robust collaborative culture demonstrate greater success in fostering sustainable innovations, minimizing environmental repercussions, and enhancing employee engagement. Furthermore, the study introduces a novel model that correlates collaboration with operational sustainability, taking into account diverse levels of resource sharing, leadership engagement, and employee empowerment. By focusing on actionable strategies, this research provides novel insights into how adaptive leadership, digital tools, and shared responsibility can transform collaboration into a driver of sustainability. This research enriches the existing body of literature by presenting an evidence-based framework for cultivating sustainable organizational cultures and provides valuable insights for prospective research on harnessing collaboration to attain long-term sustainability goals.
Keywords: employee collaboration; organizational sustainability; collaborative culture; innovative practices; digital tools; sustainable organizational development
This entry explores the emergence of ONE Paleopathology as a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to understanding health through deep time. The entry discusses key areas where paleopathological research provides crucial insights: animals as sentinels of environmental health, the evolution and transmission of infectious diseases, the impacts of urbanization and pollution on human health, and the effects of climate change on disease patterns. Special attention is given to case studies involving malaria, tuberculosis, and environmental toxicity, demonstrating how past human–environment interactions inform current health strategies. The entry also emphasizes the importance of indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems in understanding and managing health challenges, highlighting how traditional ecological knowledge complements scientific approaches. By bridging past and present, ONE Paleopathology offers valuable perspectives for addressing modern health challenges in the context of accelerating environmental change, while promoting more equitable and sustainable approaches to global health.
Keywords: global public health; environmental health; well-being of humans; animals; ecosystems
The socio-spatiality of capitalist modernity is the embodiment of pressures to eliminate common, spatially adapted institutions in the name of an allegedly more rational world demarcated by the prospect of having everything private and predisposed to be exploited. The vital element of these pressures to legitimise economic inequalities to extract more and more value from labour and nature is the phenomenon of uncommoning. This article has several interconnected goals, especially, an interpretation of the meaning and practices of uncommoningmaking use of classical, contemporary, and decolonial academic and grey literature—and a critical reflection on the frontiers of the modern world, where uncommoning is clearly the key socio-spatial driving force underpinning a deceitful democracy and providing justification for the encroachment of private properties upon the commons. This focus on the commons facilitates and radicalises the comprehension of how societies and communities deal with the allocation, use, and preservation of cherished elements of their material and immaterial reality. It can be constructively reached from the perspective of Global South societies, indigenous nations in particular, with solid experiences and knowledge of the commons. They have the outstanding intellectual and moral authority, and the main job for most is to listen, learn, and act together.
Keywords: inequalities; property; commons; politics; socio-space; social transformation; social justice
Information
Subjects: Management; Sociology
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 19.3K
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 28 Oct 2020
Video Production Service