1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Hypercrosslinking of Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) PolyHIPEs

    Subjects: Polymer Science
    View times: 7
    Submitted by: Karel Jeřábek


    The concept of polymer chain hypercrosslinking was introduced by Davankov, Rogoshin and Tsyurupa, using linear polystyrene or swollen gel-type poly (styrene-co-divinylbenzene) in the presence of an external crosslinker, solvent and a Lewis base as a catalyst.

    1. Introduction

    The concept of polymer chain hypercrosslinking was introduced by Davankov, Rogoshin and Tsyurupa, using linear polystyrene or swollen gel-type poly (styrene-co-divinylbenzene) in the presence of an external crosslinker, solvent and a Lewis base as a catalyst [1]. The result of the reaction was a three-dimensional rigid network with short and rigid connections. Generally, hypercrosslinked polymers are prepared by post-polymerisation crosslinking of long polymer chains in a swollen polymer matrix creating numerous new links. In the case of chloromethylated polystyrene, polymer chains are reacted with a Friedel–Crafts catalyst in a swelling solvent. This creates new connections by converting chloromethyl groups into methylene bridges that interconnect polymer chains resulting in the formation of micropores. Through further stages of the hypercrosslinking process, the crosslinking increases and, therefore, after solvent removal, a stable microporous network is formed [2][3]. The hypercrosslinked polymers may collapse during drying however reinforcement of their skeleton with additional crosslinks enables their re-expansion both with polar and non-polar solvents [4][5]. Hypercrosslinked polymers contain a very high density of crosslinks together with micropores and exhibit high surface area (up to 2000 m2/g) [4][6].
    The main difference between a post-polymerisation hypercrosslinking and copolymerisation crosslinking is in the pore formation method. In copolymerisation crosslinking, pores are formed due to phase separation during polymerisation between the monomer and the crosslinker, in the presence of an inert diluent. The result is the formation of a two-phase heterogeneous system where one phase represents a crosslinked polymer and the other excess diluent and possibly unpolymerised monomers. Usually, phase separation occurs near the gel point and can appear as macrosyneresis [7] when the fluid and a swollen gel make two continuous phases. Resulting macroreticular polymers have a cauliflower-like morphology [8][9][10], with pores as spaces in clusters of crosslinked polymer nodules. Such polymers usually exhibit relatively modest specific surface area and somehow poorer mechanical stability [11] than their gel-type counterparts do. Post-polymerisation crosslinking—hypercrosslinking performed on swollen polymers induces the formation of additional porosity and increases rigidity of the polymer matrix which improves its compatibility with both thermodynamically good and bad solvents [5][12] and thus improve the accessibility of reactive sites. Therefore, hypercrosslinked polymers are used as separation columns [13][14][15][16], adsorbents [17][18][19][20][21], solid state supports for catalysts [22][23][24], to name the most frequent applications.
    On the other hand, macroporous polymers in monolithic form can be obtained by the polymerisation of a continuous phase of high internal phase emulsion (polyHIPE) [25][26][27][28]. The internal (or droplet) phase is dispersed in the continuous phase of the emulsion and represents at least 74.05% of the total volume of the emulsion in the uniform packing of monodispersed droplets, or 64% in the case of random packing [29]. Most common are water-in-oil HIPEs, where the continuous phase consists of monomers, surfactants and initiator, while the internal phase is aqueous. After the polymerisation of the continuous phase, the droplet phase is removed, and macro pores are thus formed. The internal topology of polymeric material prepared in this way has two levels of pores, the primary pores, and secondary, interconnecting pores. PolyHIPEs have so far found numerous applications such as tissue engineering [30][31][32][33], as columns in separation systems [34][35][36][37][38], as supports for catalysts [6][39][40] etc.

    2. Preparation of Poly(VBC-co-DVB-co-STY)HIPEs

    Poly(VBC-co-DVB-co-STY)HIPEs were prepared with varied ratios of VBC, DVB, and STY monomers (Figure 1). Using free radical polymerisation initiated by AIBN, polyHIPE monoliths with three different crosslinking degrees were synthesized. Firstly, the influence of initial DVB-caused crosslinking, on the degree of hypercrosslinking, was evaluated. For this purpose, 2, 5 and 10 mol.% of DVB were used as initial crosslinking degree. Rather low degrees of initial crosslinking was used as it was expected that the rigidity of the polymer network would have a substantial diminishing effect on the post polymerisation hypercrosslinking process. Most examples from the literature describe a Friedel–Crafts type of hypercrosslinking performed on poly(4-vinylbenzyl chloride) with a low degree of crosslinking, up to 5 mol.% [4][6][41][42], while much less is known on this type of hypercrosslinking of networks with higher degree of crosslinking. Furthermore, we were interested in how the concentration of the hypercrosslinking monomer, in our case 4-vinylbenzyl chloride, influences the hypercrosslinking process. As the process involves a reaction between the neighboring functional groups, it is expected that the distribution of functional groups within the polymer network would have a significant effect on the formation of crosslinks during the hypercrosslinking process. Therefore, the experimental design included variation of both initial crosslinking degree (DVB content) and “dilution” of functional groups i.e., the ratio of functional to “diluting” monomer (styrene was used for this purpose). It was assumed that all added DVB to the monomer mixture was crosslinking as the highest addition of DVB was 10 mol.%. Three series of experiments were performed, one for each initial crosslinking degree (Table 1). In addition to DVB, STY was added to each batch (from 5 to 65 mol.% of monomers, Table 1), and the rest was VBC. Chloromethyl functional groups in the monomeric system was diluted with the addition of STY to obtain different VBC contents at the same initial crosslinking degrees, which proved to be an important factor in further hypercrosslinking studies of synthesized polyHIPEs.
    Figure 1. PolyHIPE preparation.
    Table 1. Composition of poly (4-vinylbenzyl chloride (VBC)/divinylbenzene (DVB)/ styrene (STY)) poly(high internal phase emulsions) (polyHIPE) samples.
    Sample Continuous Phase VAP *
    m (Span 80) [g]
    m (STY) [g] m (DVB) [g] m (VBC) [g]
    A93 0.181 0.095 4.747 18.6 1.264
    A73 0.899 0.086 3.724 17.9 1.185
    A53 1.563 0.107 2.696 17.2 1.162
    A43 1.909 0.106 2.225 16.9 1.035
    A41 1.98 0.091 2.104 16.8 0.83
    A38 2.091 0.111 1.936 16.8 0.834
    A36 2.111 0.450 1.539 16.7 0.887
    A33 2.253 0.087 1.679 16.5 1.005
    B90 0.173 0.257 4.579 18.6 1.339
    B70 0.877 0.218 3.567 17.9 1.199
    B50 1.583 0.234 2.573 17.2 1.089
    B40 1.926 0.258 2.035 16.9 1.076
    B38 1.98 0.217 1.933 16.8 0.916
    B35 2.096 0.246 1.794 16.7 0.817
    B33 2.187 0.226 1.630 16.6 0.815
    B30 2.279 0.221 1.532 16.5 1.035
    C85 0.188 0.440 4.372 18.6 1.227
    C65 0.566 0.498 3.858 18.3 1.194
    C45 1.223 0.457 2.814 17.6 1.122
    C35 1.922 0.443 1.788 16.9 1.087
    C33 1.978 0.438 1.678 16.8 0.835
    C28 2.196 0.458 1.386 16.6 0.814
    C25 2.256 0.460 1.290 16.4 0.993
    * Volume of the aqueous phase. Samples A:2 mol.% DVB, B: 5 mol.% DVB, C:10 mol.% DVB.
    The kinetic stability of the emulsion is extremely important for the formation of polyHIPE monoliths and was achieved with the addition of 20 wt.% of the surfactant Span 80 (HLB = 4.3) from the oleate family of surfactants, which is suitable for reducing the interfacial tension in w/o emulsions. With the addition of surfactant, stable HIPEs and polyHIPEs were obtained with typical interconnecting open cell polyHIPE morphology and average diameter of primary pores between 5 and 10 µm.

    3. Hypercrosslinking of PolyHIPEs

    Hypercrosslinking of polyHIPEs was performed by an established procedure, applying a Friedel–Crafts type electrophilic aromatic substitution process [6]. Generally, a chloromethyl group tethered to the polymer chain can react either with a benzene ring or another VBC moiety creating methylene bridges or cyclical type connections. DCE has been used as a solvent in which styrene-type polymers are swollen, while being effective in dissolving FeCl3, which serves as a catalyst for Friedel–Crafts alkylation reactions. The effect of this procedure was apparent both in the drop of chlorine content due to conversion of a part of chloromethyl groups into crosslinking methylene bridges and in a substantial increase of the BET surface area (Table 2).
    Table 2. Hypercrosslinking effects.
    Sample Before Hypercrosslinking After Hypercrosslinking
    Cl Content, wt.% BET Surf. Area,
    Cl Content, wt.% Residual Cl, % of Orig. BET Surf. Area,
    A93 21.90 ± 0.20 2.40 3.70 ± 0.03 16.9 709
    A73 18.00 ± 0.40 3.20 1.70 ± 0.03 9.4 636
    A53 13.90 ± 0.20 4.60 1.80 ± 0.10 12.9 410
    A43 11.70 ± 0.10 1.80 1.00 ± 0.02 8.5 279
    A41 11.20 ± 0.30 2.30 2.00 ± 0.10 17.9 304
    A38 10.30 ± 0.30 3.00 1.40 ± 0.20 13.6 122
    A36 8.20 ± 0.10 3.10 1.30 ± 0.10 15.9 5.0
    A33 9.20 ± 0.20 3.90 0.60 ± 0.03 6.5 3.9
    B90 21.30 ± 0.60 4.40 7.50 ± 0.40 35.2 585
    B70 17.80 ± 0.40 6.00 2.70 ± 0.10 15.2 491
    B50 13.70 ± 0.20 4.80 1.70 ± 0.04 12.4 412
    B40 11.00 ± 0.30 2.30 1.10 ± 0.10 10.0 196
    B38 10.40 ± 0.10 3.10 1.20 ± 0.10 11.5 217
    B35 9.60 ± 0.10 2.30 1.40 ± 0.10 14.6 70
    B33 8.90 ± 0.50 3.40 1.10 ± 0.10 12.4 8.0
    B30 8.30 ± 0.20 3.00 0.80 ± 0.10 9.6 4.2
    C85 20.40 ± 0.50 2.20 4.10 ± 0.03 20.1 536
    C65 18.20 ± 0.30 3.80 2.30 ± 0.10 12.6 547
    C45 14.30 ± 0.20 3.60 1.50 ± 0.07 10.5 350
    C35 9.60 ± 2.10 1.20 ± 0.03 12.5 62
    C33 9.20 ± 0.10 2.60 1.40 ± 0.10 15.2 14
    C28 7.60 ± 0.50 3.10 0.80 ± 0.10 10.5 14
    C25 7.10 ± 0.40 1.80 1.00 ± 0.10 14.1 13
    Samples A: 2 mol.% DVB, B: 5 mol.% DVB, C:10 mol.% DVB.
    In most cases, the residual chlorine content after hypercrosslinking was 10–15 wt.%. Somewhat surprisingly, higher values of residual chlorine (suggesting lower efficiency of the hypercrosslinking) were found in samples with the highest VBC or DVB content. In these samples, there is greater probability that within the polymer network some chloromethyl groups could be located in less accessible places. A very profound effect of the hypercrosslinking is evident in the surface area values. Before hypercrosslinking all the polymers exhibited low surface area only, corresponding with the area of the macro pores created by emulsification of the monomer mixture. The hypercrosslinking porosity modification does not modify the macroporous polyHIPE features (Figure 2).
    Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of polyHIPE samples A93 and A93H.
    Substantially higher BET surface of the hypercrosslinked polymers indicates the formation of new porosity. However, hypercrosslinking is known to produce microporosity with pores smaller than 2 nm [43]. Such narrow pores are filled with the sorbate sooner than the BET equation-described multilayer adsorption begins. Standard evaluation of the BET surface of such materials interprets the sorbate amount filling the micropores as a part of the BET multilayer, which produces incorrect BET surface area data. It is possible to distinguish between micropore volume and external surface area using the t-plot method, which is plotting the adsorbed amount against thickness of the adsorbed layer computed from adsorption on a flat surface. The software used in this study is based on the Harkins and Jura thickness equation [44]. The linear part of such a plot (usually corresponding to relative pressures 0.05–0.35) can be considered as the region of the adsorption on flat surface. The Y-intercept of such a line corresponds to the micropore volume and the slope is proportional to the external (outside micropores) surface area [45].
    T-plot analyses of the polymers before hypercrosslinking show zero or slightly negative values of the micropore volumes (−0.008–0 cm3/g) and external surface areas in the range of 0.8–8.8 m2/g, slightly higher than the BET surfaces. However, considering the completely different theoretical background of these two methods, the agreement is very good. In the hypercrosslinked polymers, both the amount of micropores and the external surface area varied in dependence of the VBC content of the polymer (Figure 3).
    Figure 3. Dependencies of micropore volume and external surface area in the hypercrosslinked polymers on the content of VBC.
    Both dependencies show that for the formation of new porosity, the presence of chloromethyl groups in about one third of the monomer units is needed. With increasing VBC concentration, both the micropore volume and the external (mesopore) surface area increase. The character of the newly created porosity and the effect of the DVB content in the starting polymers is most apparent in the samples A93, B90 and C85 having the highest VBC content in the series (Table 3). It is evident that with an increase of the DVB content (crosslinking) of the starting polymer the total volume of the hypercrosslinking-generated pore volume decreases. An increase of the crosslinking of the starting polymer also influences the pore size distribution. While with 2 mol.% DVB in the starting polymer the micropores formed in the hypercrosslinked material represent only about one quarter of the newly formed porosity, in the hypercrosslinked polymer C85 containing 10 mol.% DVB they represent half of the total porosity.
    Table 3. Comparison of micro- and meso-porosity created by hypercrosslinking.
    Sample Vp [cm3/g] Vmicro [cm3/g] Vmeso [cm3/g] Vmicro/Vp
    A93 (2 mol.% DVB) 0.43 0.12 0.31 0.28
    B90 (5 mol.% DVB) 0.40 0.18 0.22 0.45
    C85 (10 mol.% DVB) 0.30 0.15 0.15 0.50

    The entry is from 10.3390/polym13162721


    1. Davankov, V.A.; Rogozhin, V.; Tsyurupa, M.P. Macronet Polystyrene Structures for Ionites and Method of Producing Same. U.S. Patent 3,729,457, 24 April 1973.
    2. Tsyurupa, M.P.; Davankov, V.A. Hypercrosslinked polymers: Basic principle of preparing the new class of polymeric materials. React. Funct. Polym. 2002, 53, 193–203.
    3. Veverka, P.; Jeřábek, K. Influence of hypercrosslinking on adsorption and absorption on or in styrenic polymers. React. Funct. Polym. 2004, 59, 71–79.
    4. Ahn, J.H.; Jang, J.E.; Oh, C.G.; Ihm, S.K.; Cortez, J.; Sherrington, D.C. Rapid generation and control of microporosity, bimodal pore size distribution, and surface area in Davankov-type hyper-cross-linked resins. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 627–632.
    5. Veverka, P.; Jeřábek, K. Mechanism of hypercrosslinking of chloromethylated styrene– divinylbenzene copolymers. React. Funct. Polym. 1999, 41, 21–25.
    6. Pulko, I.; Wall, J.; Krajnc, P.; Cameron, N.R. Ultra-high surface area functional porous polymers by emulsion templating and hypercrosslinking: Efficient nucleophilic catalyst supports. Chem. A Eur. J. 2010, 16, 2350–2354.
    7. Dušek, K. Phase separation during the formation of three-dimensional polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Lett. 1965, 3, 209–212.
    8. Okay, O. Macroporous copolymer networks. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 711–779.
    9. Tsyurupa, M.P.; Davankov, V.A. Porous structure of hypercrosslinked polystyrene: State-of-the-art mini-review. React. Funct. Polym. 2006, 66, 768–779.
    10. Sherrington, D.C. Preparation, structure and morphology of polymer supports. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2275–2286.
    11. Sherrington, D.C.; Hodge, P. Synthesis Separations Using Functional Polymers; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA: Chichester, UK, 1988.
    12. Pastukhov, A.V.; Tsyurupa, M.P.; Davankov, V.A. Hypercrosslinked polystyrene: A polymer in a non-classical physical state. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1999, 37, 2324–2333.
    13. Davankov, V.A.; Tsyurupa, M.P.; Ilyin, M.; Pavlova, L. Hypercross-linked polystyrene and its potentials for liquid chromatography: A mini-review. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 965, 65–73.
    14. Davankov, V.A.; Sychov, C.S.; Ilyin, M.M.; Sochilina, K.O. Hypercrosslinked polystyrene as a novel type of high-performance liquid chromatography column packing material: Mechanisms of retention. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 987, 67–75.
    15. Penner, N.A.; Nesterenko, P.N.; Hyin, M.M.; Tsyurupa, M.P.; Davankov, V.A. Investigation of the properties of hypercrosslinked polystyrene as a stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 1999, 50, 611–620.
    16. Urban, J.; Svec, F.; Fréchet, J.M.J. Hypercrosslinking: New approach to porous polymer monolithic capillary columns with large surface area for the highly efficient separation of small molecules. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 8212–8221.
    17. Yang, Y.; Tan, B.; Wood, C.D. Solution-processable hypercrosslinked polymers by low cost strategies: A promising platform for gas storage and separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15072–15080.
    18. Liu, Q.; Xia, B.; Huang, J.; Liao, B.; Liu, H.; Ou, B.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Z. Hypercrosslinked polystyrene microspheres with ultrahigh surface area and their application in gas storage. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 199, 616–622.
    19. Belyakova, L.D.; Schevchenko, T.I.; Davankov, V.A.; Tsyurupa, M.P. Sorption of vapors of various substances by hypercrosslinked “styrosorb” polystyrenes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 25, 249–266.
    20. Tsyurupa, M.P.; Maslova, L.A.; Andreeva, A.I.; Mrachkovskaya, T.A.; Davankov, V.A. Sorption of organic compounds from aqueous media by hypercrosslinked polystyrene sorbents ‘Styrosorbrs’. React. Polym. 1995, 25, 69–78.
    21. Davankov, V.A.; Pavlova, L.; Tsyurupa, M.P.; Brady, J.; Balsamo, M.; Yousha, E. Polymeric adsorbent for removing toxic proteins from blood of patients with kidney failure. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 2000, 739, 73–80.
    22. Wang, K.; Jia, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Gu, Y.; Tan, B. Acid and base coexisted heterogeneous catalysts supported on hypercrosslinked polymers for one-pot cascade reactions. J. Catal. 2017, 348, 168–176.
    23. Gu, Y.; Son, S.U.; Li, T.; Tan, B. Low-Cost Hypercrosslinked Polymers by Direct Knitting Strategy for Catalytic Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 1–24.
    24. Liu, X.; Xu, W.; Xiang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, D.; Hu, Y.; Li, Y.; Ouyang, Y.; Lin, H. Palladium immobilized on functionalized hypercrosslinked polymers: A highly active and recyclable catalyst for Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions in water. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 12206–12210.
    25. Barby, D.; Haq, Z. Low Density Porous Cross-Linked Polymeric Material Sand Their Preparation. EP Patent 60138, 6 November 1985.
    26. Pulko, I.; Krajnc, P. Porous Polymer Monoliths by Emulsion Templating. Encycl. Polym. Sci. Technol. 2017, 1–28.
    27. Cameron, N.R. High internal phase emulsion templating as a route to well-defined porous polymers. Polymer 2005, 46, 1439–1449.
    28. Zhang, T.; Sanguramath, R.A.; Israel, S.; Silverstein, M.S. Emulsion Templating: Porous Polymers and Beyond. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 5445–5479.
    29. Foudazi, R.; Qavi, S.; Masalova, I.; Malkin, A.Y. Physical chemistry of highly concentrated emulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 220, 78–91.
    30. Naranda, J.; Sušec, M.; Maver, U.; Gradišnik, L.; Gorenjak, M.; Vukasović, A.; Ivković, A.; Rupnik, M.S.; Vogrin, M.; Krajnc, P. Polyester type polyHIPE scaffolds with an interconnected porous structure for cartilage regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–11.
    31. Paljevac, M.; Gradišnik, L.; Lipovšek, S.; Maver, U.; Kotek, J.; Krajnc, P. Multiple-Level Porous Polymer Monoliths with Interconnected Cellular Topology Prepared by Combining Hard Sphere and Emulsion Templating for Use in Bone Tissue Engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2018, 18, 1–8.
    32. Busby, W.; Cameron, N.R.; Jahoda, C.A.B. Emulsion-derived foams (PolyHIPEs) containing poly(Sε-caprolactone) as matrixes for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 154–164.
    33. Owen, R.; Sherborne, C.T.; Green, N.H.; Reilly, G.C.; Claeyssens, F. Emulsion templated scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties for bone tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 54, 159–172.
    34. Choudhury, S.; Fitzhenry, L.; White, B.; Connolly, D. Polystyrene-co-divinylbenzene polyHIPE monoliths in 1.0 mm column formats for liquid chromatography. Materials 2016, 9, 212.
    35. Kovačič, S.; Krajnc, P. Macroporous monolithic poly(4-vinylbenzyl chloride) columns for organic synthesis facilitation by in situ polymerization of high internal phase emulsions. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 6726–6734.
    36. Huš, S.; Kolar, M.; Krajnc, P. Separation of heavy metals from water by functionalized glycidyl methacrylate poly (high internal phase emulsions). J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1437, 168–175.
    37. Taylor-Pashow, K.M.L.; Pribyl, J.G. PolyHIPEs for Separations and Chemical Transformations: A Review. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2019, 37, 1–26.
    38. Krajnc, P.; Leber, N.; Štefanec, D.; Kontrec, S.; Podgornik, A. Preparation and characterisation of poly(high internal phase emulsion) methacrylate monoliths and their application as separation media. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1065, 69–73.
    39. Koler, A.; Paljevac, M.; Cmager, N.; Iskra, J.; Kolar, M.; Krajnc, P. Poly(4-vinylpyridine) polyHIPEs as catalysts for cycloaddition click reaction. Polymer 2017, 126, 402–407.
    40. Kawada, K.; Okano, K.; Iskra, J.; Krajnc, P.; Cahard, D. SelectfluorTMon a PolyHIPE Material as Regenerative and Reusable Polymer-Supported Electrophilic Fluorinating Agent. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 584–589.
    41. Lee, J.Y.; Wood, C.D.; Bradshaw, D.; Rosseinsky, M.J.; Cooper, A.I. Hydrogen adsorption in microporous hypercrosslinked polymers. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2670–2672.
    42. Macintyre, F.S.; Sherrington, D.C.; Tetley, L. Synthesis of ultrahigh surface area monodisperse porous polymer nanospheres. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 5381–5384.
    43. Rouquerol, J.; Avnir, D.; Fairbridge, D.H.; Everett, C.W.; Haynes, J.M.; Pernicone, N.; Ramsay, J.D.F.; Sing, K.S.W.; Unger, K.K. Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1739–1758.
    44. Harkins, W.D.; Jura, G. Surfaces of Solids. XI. Determination of Decrease (pi) of Free Surface Energy of a Solid by Adsorbed Film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1356–1362.
    45. Gregg, S.J.; Sing, K.S.W. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1982.