1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Rotational Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

    Subjects: Energy & Fuels
    View times: 12
    Submitted by: Haider Jaafar Chilabi
    (This entry belongs to Entry Collection "Sustainable and Resource – Efficient Homes and Communities ")

    Definition

    Rotational Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting (RPZTEH) is widely used due to mechanical rotational input power availability in industrial and natural environments. This paper reviews the recent studies and research in RPZTEH based on its excitation elements and design and their influence on performance. It presents different groups for comparison according to their mechanical inputs and applications, such as fluid (air or water) movement, human motion, rotational vehicle tires, and other rotational operational principal including gears. The work emphasises the discussion of different types of excitations elements, such as mass weight, magnetic force, gravity force, centrifugal force, gears teeth, and impact force, to show their effect on enhancing output power. It revealed that a small compact design with the use of magnetic, gravity, and centrifugal forces as excitation elements and a fixed piezoelectric to avoid a slip ring had a good influence on output power optimisation. One of the interesting designs that future works should focus on is using gear for frequency up-conversion to enhance output power density and keep the design simple and compact.

    1. Introduction

    Energy harvesting is defined as the process of converting mechanical energy such as distortion energy, vibration, or other kinetic energy into electrical energy [1]. Fast development in wireless sensor networks (WSN), and storage power with better efficiency solutions will finally increase using of self-power devices in health care, monitoring of the environment, and automotive applications [2]. However, limitation of power source and batteries, such as volume, weight, and short lifetime, which is much less than the WSN life, changing the batteries frequently, and devices in hard reach area [3]. All these limitations make the powering of microdevices and WSNs using energy harvester considering a feasible approach in our environment due to its small size, low power consumption, and special working environment [4][5].

    Piezoelectric energy harvesting is one of the innovative approaches that has been evolved and implemented for harvesting power for microdevices using different types of mechanical power sources [6]. Most of the previously published review papers mentioned rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting partly and focused mainly on frequency up-conversion or bandwidth widening [2][7][8][9][10][11][12]

    The Rotational Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting (RPZTEH) operation principle is based on the plucking of piezoelectric for excitation, which results in piezoelectric vibration, bending, or pressing, and thus voltage is generated. This plucking could be done using different excitation elements.

    2. Methodology

    In the present entry, the comparisons of excitation elements, design and their influence on performance are divided into four types according to mechanical inputs: fluids (air, water) movement, human motion, rotational vehicle tires, and other rotational operational principals. For each one, mechanical inputs, excitation type, design, methodology, and wiring have been characterised and thoroughly reviewed. The type of excitation has been subdivided according to excitation elements, such as mass, gear, magnetic, spring, centrifugal, gravity and impact forces. Each group may contain one or more of the excitation elements to conclude which group has the maximum influence on rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting enhancement. The design comparison also discusses the piezoelectric rotation, which may affect the type of wiring for output power transfer. The fixed piezoelectric cantilever uses direct wiring, while a rotating one requires either a slip ring or Arduino and Bluetooth for output power transfer. For each of the following section. At the end of each section, a summary table was made by the author with full detail and calculated power density for related previous works, as in Tables 1–3. A plot has also been made by the authors for all the designs, due to rpm and output power density, to give a clear idea about the best excitation elements and which one has the highest power density, and as in Figures 5, 9, 13, and 18, respectively. Figure 1 show the methodology schematic diagram. are also included in this paper. The advantage or disadvantage of each mechanical input study was identified, and future research recommendations were discussed.

    Figure 1. Methodology schematic diagram.

    3. Fluids Movement Applications

    3.1. Comparison of Different Designs and Excitation Elements

    Firstly, the studies that use air (wind) as a mechanical input source for RPZTEH have been reported. Using air only as an excitation element, Stamatellou & Kalfas [13] utilised air swirled to create a turbulent flow field and harvest energy, as shown in Figure 2a. Similarly, Febbo et al. [14] performed a novel design alternative to a simple PZT beam that fixed the beam to a hub, by utilising a beam, spring, gravity, centrifugal forces, and two masses as excitation elements, as shown in Figure 2b. The same authors enhanced their model [15] by adding a single side spring stop, in addition to the two-flexible beam, and the spring that joined the two dense masses, as shown in Figure 2c.

    Energies 14 03098 g002 550

    Figure 2. (a) Simultaneous measurement of the pressure and piezoelectric film output voltage [13]; (b) View of rotating energy harvesting system [14]; (c) View of enhanced energy harvester [15].

    However, Y. Yang et al. [16] have used impact-induced resonant to have piezoelectric beam effective excitation vibration mode. The harvester-based knowledge designed is that; an impact could excite resonance beneath any operating conditions. A configuration has been made of twelve PZT beams and a seven ball, as shown in Figure 3a.  Alternatively, Zhao et al. [17] presented an innovative method for RPZTEH with wind and use mechanisms of force amplification and magnetic coupling as excitation only. By arranging the magnetic in a symmetrical opposite way, they maximised the effective force and significantly reduced the resistance torque, as in Figure 3b. Additionally, a built-in wind generator has been designed to supply sensor nodes with power in hard reach or remote locations from low wind speed by Karami et al. [18] using magnetic only as excitation. Two configurations have been made: a tangential and a radial one, as in Figure 3c. 

    Energies 14 03098 g003 550

    Figure 3. (a) Piezoelectric windmill diagram shows piezoelectric bimorphs arrangement [16]; (b) Schematic illustration and working mechanism of the investigated Magnetically Coupled Piezoelectric Wind Energy Harvester (MPWEH). The symmetrical opposite magnetic arrangements [17]; (c) Prototypes of nonlinear wind harvester: configuration of tangential design and configuration of radial design [18].

    Furthermore, a piezoelectric energy harvester and hydro-electromagnetic have been designed to give power to the smart type of water meter system using water flow and magnetic force for excitation by Cho et al. [19]. A stainless-steel turn-buckle water wheel of 90 mm diameter and two magnets was proposed in this work, as shown in Figure 4a. Conversely, in the An et al. study, a novel vortex-induced PZT energy converter (VIPEC) is proposed to harvest the ocean’s kinetic energy in the underwater environment [20]. The harvester consists of a storage circuit, PZT patches, cylinder, and a pivoted plate attached to its tail, as shown in Figure 4b.

    Energies 14 03098 g004 550

    Figure 4. (a) Pipe-flow energy harvester system using magnets and with no contact [19]; (b) A general view for a vortex-induced piezoelectric energy harvester [20].

    3.2. The Influence of Excitation Elements and Design on Performance (Challenges and Issues)

    As shown in Table 1, a comparison has been made between variable factors, divided into input, output, and comments. In general frequency (rpm), Piezoelectric size, dimension, and material type, resistance, and whether the Piezoelectric rotate or not, using a slip ring or not, all these elements affect piezoelectric energy harvesting output power, as shown in Table 1. Output power and power density are also included in this table. Although, excitation elements affect the design, however, as shown in Table 1, for the same excitation elements, the output power density is different depending on the design. The materials used in the RPZTEH were mainly PZT; however some researchers used PVDF and PZT composite.

    Table 1. Summary comparison for rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting studies with detailed information.
    Number Ref. Input Output Comments
    Excitation Elements Volume (mm3) Piezo Dimension (mm) Polarisation Mode Material Type Use rpm Frequency (Hz) Optimal Resistance (Ω) Power (µW) Power Density (µW/mm3) Mechanical Power Source PZT Rotate or Not Wiring
    1 [13] air swirler 96.2 37 × 13 × 0.2 / PVDF 300 6 47 3 0.03 Air Not Normal wiring
    2 [14] M + Sp + Gr 328 50.8 × 25.4 × 0.254 d31 PZT 5A 150 13.1 10 k 105 0.32 Air Yes storage rotates with the system
    3 [15] Sp + M + Gr 326.5 50.8 × 25.4 × 0.254 d31 QP16N 150 2.5 5 × 105 845 2.588 Air Yes Bluetooth
    4 [16] imp 470 (47 × 20 × 0.5) / PZT 200 3.33 20 k 613 1.3 Air Yes supercapacitor
    5 [21] M + Mg 4.26 16 × 3.5 × 0.076 / PZT-bimorph 751 12.5 200 k 0.25 0.06 Air Not fixed piezo
    6 [22] M + Mg 115 31.8 × 7.12 × 0.508 d31 Q220-A4–303YB 3696 61.6 3300 / 0.59 Air Not the application within the rotation area
    7 [17] Mg 400 40 × 10 × 1 / (PZT-5H) 546 9.1 3 × 105 1320 3.3 Air Not /
    8 [23] Mg 3360 70 × 32 × 1.5 / PZT layer 600 10 8000 k 16000 4.76 Air Not Normal wiring
    9 [18] Mg 323 (50 × 12.7 × 0.127) × 4 d31 PZT-5A 200 16 247 k 5000 15.5 Air Not Normal wiring
    10 [24] M + Gr + Mg 776 40.2 × 25.4 × 0.76 d31 (PPA-2011) 30 34 25 k 2200 2.835 Air Yes slip ring
    11 [19] Mg 315 45 × 35 × 0.2 d31 PZT-ceramic 120 / 10 k 196 0.6222 Wat Not /
    12 [20] vortex-induced / / d31 PZT / 16.49 1 × 105 / 0.035 1E + 09 Wat Not /
    13 [25] Water flow + slide-crank 166.4 52 × 16 × 0.2 / ionic polymer metal composites 372.4 1 50 1 × 109   Wat Not /
    M for mass, Mg for magnetic, Gr for gravity, Sp for spring, Wat for water, air for air, imp for impact force, and /for no information from the authors.

    In Figure 5, all the above studies have been plotted with rpm and output power density to have a clear idea about the best excitation elements with the highest power density. As shown in the figure, the studies that use magnetic force as an excitation element get an excellent output power density [18][23]. Both of them use only magnets for excitation and able to harvest excellent output power.

    Energies 14 03098 g005 550

    Figure 5. Power density comparison for different studies on rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting for fluid input mechanical power source with different excitation elements and as follows: M for Mass, Mg for magnetic, Gr for gravity, Sp for spring, and air swirler for air swirler.

    4. Human Motion Applications

    4.1. Comparison of Different Designs and Excitation Elements

    One of the challenges of human motion energy harvesting is random excitation and low frequency. Pillatsch et al. [26] used a successful frequency up-conversion strategy: introducing an inertial device containing PZT beam buckling principle using the magnetic coupling of two permanent magnets and a rotating mass in half disk shape with a gravitational force as excitation elements, as shown in Figure 6a.

    Energies 14 03098 g006 550

    Figure 6. (a) Harvester prototype isometric view and section view [26]. (b) Diagram structure of the wrist driven rotational energy harvester using magnetically plucked PZT [27]; (c) The energy harvester diagram [12].

    A novel wearable energy harvester that converts the low frequency of human limb into high frequency has been proposed in this study by Li, Keli, et al. [28]. Micromachined nickel cantilever and NdFeB magnet were glued and fixed on a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) film, as shown in Figure 7a.

    Energies 14 03098 g007 550

    Figure 7. (a) Photos show wearable applications where two flexible harvesters are fixed on a human elbow and knee with Close views [28]; (b) Piezoelectric knee-joint energy harvester with frequency up-conversion by magnetic plucking [29]. However, in this study, Mohamad Hanif et al. [30] was utilised only the mass concept for excitation. They have designed a prototype consists of PZT cantilever, a rotor with a pole on it for PZT plucking, and aluminium proof mass, as in Figure 8a. 

    Energies 14 03098 g008 550

    Figure 8. (a) Exploded view of the rotational motion energy harvester device [30]; (b) The harvester rotor design with the motion of magnetic and internal rotor [31].

    4.2. The Influence of Excitation Elements and Design on Performance (Challenges and Issues)

    Table 2 summarises different variables, divided into input, output, and comments. Excitation elements greatly affect the shape of the design and make it suitable for certain applications and help harvest sufficient output power.

    Table 2. Summary Comparison for rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting studies with detailed information.
      INPUT Output Comments
    © Ref. Excitation Elements Volume (mm3) Piezo Dimension (mm) Polarisation Mode Material Type Use rpm Frequency (Hz) Optimal Resistance (Ω) Power (µW) Power Density (µW/mm3) Mechanical Power Source PZT Rotate or Not Wiring
    1 [26] M + Mg + Gr 1850 / / PZT 120 4 150 k 43 0.0232 HM Yes /
    2 [27] M + Mg 18.06 12 × 3.5 × 0.43 / piezo-electric M1100 ceramic 75 1.25 95 k 6.25 0.3461 HM Not Normal wiring
    3 [32] M + Mg 73.1 42 × 7.1 × 0.245 / PZT-5H 60 1 80 k 140 1.92 HM Yes Normal wiring
    4 [12] M + Mg 1012 33 × 14 × 0.73 d31 PZT5A 1212 20.2 75 4230 4.18 HM Yes slip ring
    5 [33] Mg 103.8 6.4 × 31.8 × 0.51 d31 PZT-5A4E 100 1.667 / 234.5 2.259 HM Not Normal wiring
    6 [28] Mg 1.2 5 × 4 × 0.06 d31 PZT 300 5 40 k 3.5 2.92 HM Yes /
    7 [29] Mg 1471 38.1 × 12.7 × 0.38 / PZT bimorph 5H 54 0.9 15 k 5800 3.94 HM Yes /
    8 [30] M 200 40 × 10 × 0.5 / PZT5H) 1080 18 12 k 1300 6.5 HM Yes Normal wiring
    9 [31] Mg + Gr 7.22 19.5 × 1 × 0.37   PZT bimorph 1500 25 151 k 100 13.9 HM Yes Normal wiring
    M for mass, Mg for magnetic, Gr for gravity, HM for human motion, and/for no information from the authors.

    Energies 14 03098 g009 550

    Figure 9. Rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting for human motion mechanical input with excitation elements and as follow: M for Mass, Mg for magnetic, and Gr for gravity.

    5. Rotational Vehicle Tires Applications

    5.1. Comparison of Different Designs and Excitation Elements

    Xie, Kwuimy et al. [34] presented a rotational energy harvester using a PZT bistable buckled beam, with a rotating disk in low rotational speed, and magnetic force only as excitation as in Figure 10a. Furthermore, Fu & Yeatman [35] also used magnetic coupling as excitation for frequency up-conversion in low-frequency rotational energy harvesting. A prototype consists of a piezoelectric cantilever harvester with a magnetic on its tip and a rotating magnetic on the rotating host, as shown in Figure 10b.

    Energies 14 03098 g010 550

    Figure 10. (a) Energy harvester design [34]; (b) Energy harvester diagram: Outline of magnetic coupling and parameters of structure [35].

    Along with, Zhang et al. 2016 [36], presented an energy harvester using magnets, mass, and gravity force for excitation. The prototype consisted of; aluminium beam, PZT adhesive on it, two magnets, and an adjusting pole to change the distance between them, as in Figure 11a. Similarly, mass, magnetic, but with centrifugal force, has been used as the design excitation elements by Shange et al. 2018 [37]. A prototype consists of two magnetic masses with the same polarities and a cantilever beam with piezoelectric attached to it, which is applied on a rotating energy harvester tire, as in Figure 11b.

    Energies 14 03098 g011 550

    Figure 11. (a) Energy harvester fixed to the wheel centre [36]; (b) Rotating tire energy harvester model, with real one photo [37].

    Hence, Guan & Lia [38] have used mass, spring, and gravity forces for excitation. The prototype is made of; piezoelectric mounted on a beam and fixed near the edge of a rotating frame with mass at its end, as in Figure 12.

    Energies 14 03098 g012 550

    Figure 12. The prototype of the piezoelectric harvester structure fixes on the frame [38].

    5.2. The Influence of Excitation Elements and Design on Performance (Challenges and Issues)

    As shown in Table 3, a comparison has been made between variable factors, divided into input, output, and comments. In general frequency (rpm), PZT size, dimension, and material type, resistance, and whether the PZT rotate or not, using a slip ring or not, all these elements that affect on piezoelectric energy harvesting output power has been reported in Table 1, also, both output power and power density have been reported as well in this table.

    Table 3. Summary Comparison for rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting studies with detailed information.
      Input Output Comments
    Number Ref. Excitation Elements Volume (mm3) Piezo Dimension (mm) Polarisation Mode Material Type Use rpm Frequency (Hz) Optimal Resistance (Ω) Power (µW) power Density (µW/mm3) Mechanical Power Source PZT Rotate or No Wiring
    1 [34] Mg 42.2 22 × 8 × 0.24 / PZT-5H 840 14 110 k 65.4 1.55 VT No Direct wiring
    2 [35] Mg 3.98 26.5 × 1.5 × 0.1 / / 2100 300 / 20 5.03 VT No Direct wiring
    3 [39] Mg + Cn 64.5 25.4 × 12.7 × 0.2 / PZT 5A 330 5.5 / 3.5 0.05 VT Yes /
    4 [4] Mg + Cn 30 25 × 12 × 0.1 D31- PVDF 965 16 600 k 36 1.2 VT Yes Slip ring
    5 [36] M + Mg + Gr 22.9 22.9 × 10 × 0.1 / PZT-ceramic 552 9.2 252 k 12 0.52 VT / /
    6 [37] M + Mg + Cn 21.3 22.9 × 9.3 × 0.1 / / 365 6.08 150 k 240 11.3 VT Yes /
    7 [40] Cn 80 25 × 6.4 × 0.5 d31 PZT 972 16.2 / 123 1.54 VT Yes slip ring
    8 [41] M + Cn 130 41.3 × 6.3 × 0.5 / PZT 792 13.2 / 700 5.38 VT Yes slip ring
    9 [42] Cn + M 24.5 70 × 5 × 0.07 d33 PZT-5H 952 15.9 1000 k 500 20.4 VT Yes slip ring
    10 [38] M + Sp + Gr 380 28.5 × 50 × 0.267 / PSI-5A4E 810 13.5 / 825 2.17 VT Yes slip ring
    11 [43] M + Sp + Cn 66 22 × 6 × 0.5 D31 PVDF 700 11.7 3300 k 140 2.12 VT Yes slip ring
    12 [44] M + Gr + Cn 600 150 × 20 × 0.2 / PVDF 504 / 2 × 105 1003 1.6717 VT Yes slip ring
    13 [45] M + Gr + Cn 424.2 101 × 20 × 0.21 / PZT (MFC) 1008 16.79 2 × 105 6280 14.804 VT Yes Sd card
    14 [46] M + Gr + Cn 612 51 × 20 × 0.6 d31 PZT-5H 1300 21.67 40 k 16,520 26.993 VT Yes slip ring
    M for mass, Mg for magnetic, Cn for centrifugal, Gr for gravity, Sp for spring, VT for vehicle tires, and/for no information from the authors.

    Figure 13 compares all these designs according to rpm and the output power density to have a clear idea about the best excitation elements. As shown in the Figure, almost 78% of the reported studies have used centrifugal force for excitation.

    Energies 14 03098 g013 550

    Figure 13. Rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting for vehicle tires mechanical input with excitation elements and as follow: M for mass, Mg for magnetic, Cn for centrifugal, Gr for gravity, and Sp for spring.

    6. Conclusions

    In general, many essential factors influence the rotational piezoelectric harvester output power, which made a wide range of output power from nano to milliWatts. Design with a fixed piezoelectric cantilever is more favourable for future work. In this case, normal wiring can be used for the output power transfer, without a slip ring or any extra component that makes the design less compact. Generally, for most rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting applications, it can be said that the magnetic force had a good influence on optimising output power considering the pole direction and the number of magnets. The studies revealed that the design of a small compact prototype with a fixed piezoelectric to avoid slip ring and using magnetic, gravity, and centrifugal forces had a good influence on output power optimisation. Future work should also focus on using gear for frequency up-conversion to enhance output power density and keep the design simple and compact.

    The entry is from 10.3390/en14113098

    References

    1. Ando, B.; Baglio, S.; L’Episcopo, G.; Trigona, C. Investigation on Mechanically Bistable MEMS Devices for Energy Harvesting from Vibrations. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2012, 21, 779–790.
    2. Yang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zu, J.; Inman, D. High-Performance Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters and Their Applications. Joule 2018, 2, 642–697.
    3. Roundy, S.; Wright, P.K.; Rabaey, J.M. Energy scavenging for wireless sensor networks. In Norwell; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 45–47.
    4. Wu, X.; Parmar, M.; Lee, D. A Seesaw-Structured Energy Harvester with Superwide Bandwidth for TPMS Application. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2014, 19, 1514–1522.
    5. Kherbeet, A.S.; Salleh, H.; Salman, B.H.; Salim, M. Vibration-based piezoelectric micropower generator for power plant wireless monitoring application. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2015, 11, 42–52.
    6. Elahi, H.; Eugeni, M.; Gaudenzi, P. A Review on Mechanisms for Piezoelectric-Based Energy Harvesters. Energies 2018, 11, 1850.
    7. Nabavi, S.; Zhang, L. Portable Wind Energy Harvesters for Low-Power Applications: A Survey. Sensors 2016, 16, 1101.
    8. Caliò, R.; Rongala, U.; Camboni, D.; Milazzo, M.; Stefanini, C.; de Petris, G.; Oddo, C. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions. Sensors 2014, 14, 4755–4790.
    9. Shaikh, F.K.; Zeadally, S. Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1041–1054.
    10. Spanner, K.; Koc, B. Piezoelectric Motors, an Overview. Actuators 2016, 5, 6.
    11. Mei, X.; Zhou, S.; Yang, Z.; Kaizuka, T.; Nakano, K. A passively self-tuning nonlinear energy harvester in rotational motion: Theoretical and experimental investigation. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 045033.
    12. Larkin, M.; Tadesse, Y. HM-EH-RT: Hybrid multimodal energy harvesting from rotational and translational motions. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2013, 4, 257–285.
    13. Stamatellou, A.M.; Kalfas, A.I. Experimental investigation of energy harvesting from swirling flows using a piezoelectric film transducer. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 171, 1405–1415.
    14. Febbo, M.; Machado, S.P.; Gatti, C.D.; Ramirez, J.M. An out-of-plane rotational energy harvesting system for low frequency environments. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 152, 166–175.
    15. Machado, S.P.; Febbo, M.; Ramírez, J.M.; Gatti, C.D. Rotational double-beam piezoelectric energy harvester impacting against a stop. J. Sound Vib. 2020, 469, 115141.
    16. Yang, Y.; Shen, Q.; Jin, J.; Wang, Y.; Qian, W.; Yuan, D. Rotational piezoelectric wind energy harvesting using impact-induced resonance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 053901.
    17. Zhao, L.C.; Zou, H.X.; Yan, G.; Liu, F.R.; Tan, T.; Wei, K.X.; Zhang, W.M. Magnetic coupling and flextensional amplification mechanisms for high-robustness ambient wind energy harvesting. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 201, 112166.
    18. Karami, M.A.; Farmer, J.R.; Inman, D.J. Parametrically excited nonlinear piezoelectric compact wind turbine. Renew. Energy 2013, 50, 977–987.
    19. Cho, J.Y.; Choi, J.Y.; Jeong, S.W.; Ahn, J.H.; Hwang, W.S.; Yoo, H.H.; Sung, T.H. Design of hydro electromagnetic and piezoelectric energy harvesters for a smart water meter system. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2017, 261, 261–267.
    20. An, X.; Song, B.; Tian, W.; Ma, C. Design and CFD Simulations of a Vortex-Induced Piezoelectric Energy Converter (VIPEC) for Underwater Environment. Energies 2018, 11, 330.
    21. Bai, Y.; Havránek, Z.; Tofel, P.; Meggs, C.; Hughes, H.; Button, T.W. Nonlinear piezoelectric devices for broadband air-flow energy harvesting. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2015, 224, 2675–2685.
    22. Rezaei-Hosseinabadi, N.; Tabesh, A.; Dehghani, R. A Topology and Design Optimization Method for Wideband Piezoelectric Wind Energy Harvesters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 63, 2165–2173.
    23. Çelik, K.; Kurt, E.; Uzun, Y. Experimental and Theoretical Explorations on the Buckling Piezoelectric Layer under Magnetic Excitation. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 4003–4016.
    24. Nezami, S.; Jung, H.; Lee, S. Design of a disk-swing driven piezoelectric energy harvester for slow rotary system application. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 074001.
    25. Cellini, F.; Cha, Y.; Porfiri, M. Energy harvesting from fluid-induced buckling of ionic polymer metal composites. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2014, 25, 1496–1510.
    26. Pillatsch, P.; Yeatman, E.M.; Holmes, A.S. A piezoelectric frequency up-converting energy harvester with rotating proof mass for human body applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2014, 206, 178–185.
    27. Halim, M.A.; Xue, T.; Rantz, R.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, L.; Yang, K.; Roundy, S. Fabrication and characterization of a wrist-driven rotational energy harvester using multiple plucked piezoelectric unimorphs. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1407, 012068.
    28. Li, K.; He, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Li, X. Wearable energy harvesters generating electricity from low-frequency human limb movement. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2018, 4, 24.
    29. Kuang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, M. Design and characterisation of a piezoelectric knee-joint energy harvester with frequency up-conversion through magnetic plucking. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 085029.
    30. Mohamad Hanif, N.H.H.; Jazlan Mohaideen, A.; Azam, H.; Rohaimi, M.E. Rotational piezoelectric energy harvester for wearable devices. Cogent Eng. 2018, 5, 1430497.
    31. Pillatsch, P.; Yeatman, E.M.; Holmes, A.S.; Wright, P.K. Wireless power transfer system for a human motion energy harvester. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 244, 77–85.
    32. Fan, K.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yu, B. Performance of a multipurpose piezoelectric energy harvester. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2017, 31, 1741007.
    33. Sriyuttakrai, S.; Isarakorn, D.; Boonprasert, S.; Nundrakwang, S. Practical Test of Contactless Rotational Piezoelectric Generator for Low Speed Application. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE PES GTD Grand International Conference and Exposition Asia (GTD Asia), Bangkok, Thailand, 20–23 March 2019; pp. 80–85.
    34. Xie, Z.; Kitio Kwuimy, C.A.; Wang, Z.; Huang, W. A piezoelectric energy harvester for broadband rotational excitation using buckled beam. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 015125.
    35. Fu, H.; Yeatman, E.M. A methodology for low-speed broadband rotational energy harvesting using piezoelectric transduction and frequency up-conversion. Energy 2017, 125, 152–161.
    36. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, R.; Shimono, K.; Kaizuka, T.; Nakano, K. Effectiveness Testing of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvester for an Automobile Wheel Using Stochastic Resonance. Sensors 2016, 16, 1727.
    37. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, R.; Nakano, K.; Cartmell, M.P. rotating-tyre-induced energy harvesting Stabilising high energy orbit oscillations by the utilisation of centrifugal effects for rotating-tyre-induced energy harvesting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 143901, 2–7.
    38. Guan, M.; Liao, W. Design and analysis of a piezoelectric energy harvester for rotational motion system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 111, 239–244.
    39. Manla, G.; White, N.M.; Tudor, M.J. Numerical Model of a Non-Contact Piezoelectric Energy Harvester for Rotating Objects. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 1785–1793.
    40. Gu, L.; Livermore, C. Compact passively self-tuning energy harvesting for rotating applications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2012, 21, 015002.
    41. Gu, L.; Livermore, C. Passive self-tuning energy harvester for extracting energy from rotational motion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 081904.
    42. Zhu, B.; Han, J.; Zhao, J.; Deng, W. Practical Design of an Energy Harvester Considering Wheel Rotation for Powering Intelligent Tire Systems. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 2483–2493.
    43. Yu-Jen, W.; Tsung-Yi, C.; Jui-Hsin, Y. Design and kinetic analysis of piezoelectric energy harvesters with self-adjusting resonant frequency. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 095037.
    44. Rui, X.; Li, Y.; Zheng, X.; Sha, Z.; Zeng, Z. Design and experimental study of a piezoelectric energy harvester in automotive spokes. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2019, 52, 355501.
    45. Rui, X.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Huang, X.; Sha, Z. Design and Experimental Investigation of a Self-Tuning Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting System for Intelligent Vehicle Wheels. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 1440–1451.
    46. Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Cao, D.; Huang, W. Compressive-mode piezoelectric energy harvesting in translational and rotational systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Hong Kong, China, 8–12 July 2019; pp. 1598–1603.
    More