1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Pelleted Diets for Farmed Decapods

    Subjects: Zoology
    View times: 5


    The current practice of decapod aquaculture involves the provision of juveniles with food such as natural diet, live feed, and formulated feed. Knowledge of nutrient requirements enables diets to be better formulated. By manipulating the levels of proteins and lipids, a formulated feed can be expected to lead to optimal growth in decapods. The use of formulated feed for decapods at a commercial scale is still in the early stages. This is probably because of the unique feeding behavior that decapods possess: being robust, slow feeders and bottom dwellers, their feeding preferences change during the transition from pelagic larvae to benthic juveniles as their digestive systems develop and become more complex. 

    1. Historical Developments in Cultivation

    Decapods are valuable sources of aquatic food protein, and their fisheries and aquaculture support the economic growth of many coastal countries [1]. The increasing demand for seafood products has led to considerable interest in cultivating decapod species at a larger scale. The cultivation of decapods in various countries began during the 1980s with raising juveniles from the wild. In 2018, aquaculture reported a strong growth in decapod production, primarily of penaeid shrimp, crabs, and spiny lobsters (9.4 million tons), as compared with the previous year [2].

    The success of decapod farming is dependent on the variety of diets [3][4][5]. Current practices of commercially decapod farming involve the provision of juveniles with food such as natural diet, live feed, and formulated feed [6]. The developments of a formulated feed for decapods begins with the use of fish oil (FO) and fishmeal (FM) as the main sources of lipids and proteins, with other ingredients such as wheat flour being the main source of carbohydrates (CHO). The inclusion of vitamins and minerals, probiotics, and other feed additives, when combined, satisfy the growth demand. 

    Current research into the development of decapod formulated feeds is geared towards the juvenile stage, but limited information is available on decapod groups in the adult stage. This is probably because of the unique feeding behavior that decapods possess: being robust [7], slow feeders [8] and bottom dwellers [9]. In addition, most published studies on commercially farmed decapod nutrition lack data on the physical characteristics of the feeds, such as water stability, palatability, and digestibility. Due to these issues, it is difficult to establish a standard feed formulation that focuses on physical pellet properties.

    2. Decapod Feeding Biology

    Decapods typically have two pairs of appendages (antennules and antennae) in front of the mouth and paired appendages near the mouth that function as jaws, which affects their feeding selection. Many decapod crustaceans are described as bottom feeders and scavengers that feed on dead animals that reside on the seafloor [10].

    In addition, several species are restricted to certain environments that affect the feeding selection between species and between life stages [11][12][13][14].

    Moreover, feeding preferences also change at different growth stages, for example, the pelagic larvae of many decapod groups such as shrimp and crabs are generally opportunistic, preying on anything suspended in the water, such as plankton (phyto- and zooplankton) [15].

    2.1. Factors That Affect Feeding of Decapods

    2.1.1. Biotic Factors

    Biotic factors that affect feeding selection in decapods involve the sensory basis, which includes vision, chemoreception, mechanoreception, and electrosensory systems. In adult decapods such as prawns, shrimps, and crabs, vision is not as important as the other sensory systems since they are nocturnal [10][16][17]. At the same time, other decapods such as the tropical spiny lobster use chemoreception to locate food from the beginning of the juvenile stage since this species resides on the seafloor [18].

    On the other hand, mechanoreception is defined as the ability of a decapod to detect and respond to mechanical stimuli such as touch, sound, and changes in pressure or posture in their surrounding environment. In decapods, mechanoreception is used to avoid predators or detect prey. 

    2.1.2. Abiotic Factors

    Abiotic factors such as light and day length, temperature, water quality, and the physical properties of the food greatly affect decapod feeding responses. The presence of light is especially important in the decapod during larval stages because, compared with adult decapods, they are primarily nocturnal during the mature stage [19].

    Meanwhile, water quality directly affects feeding responses in decapods. Decapod species depend on their chemical senses for foraging and social interactions, so a low water quality may result in a low feeding rate.

    3. Nutritional Requirements of Juvenile Stages

    In decapod feedings, protein, lipid, and carbohydrate (CHO) are described as the most important components of the nutrient classes, acting as the main sources of nutrients for embryonic development and growth [20]. Table 1 shows the macro- and micronutrients of different decapod groups during the juvenile stages.

    Table 1. Macro and micronutrients in feed formulation of decapods during juvenile stages.
    Decapod Group Macronutrients Micronutrients Feed Additives Reference
    Protein Carbohydrates Lipid Derivatives Vitamin Mineral
    Lipid Cholesterol Fatty Acids Carotenoid
    Prawn 47.3% N/A 7.5% 0.5% 3.0% EFA Carophyll pink: 0.15% 1.6% 2.0% Ethoxyquin, squid mantle muscle, L-a-phosphatidylcholine, crystalline amino acids, sodium alginate, tetra-sodium-pyrophosphatem, α-cholestane, α- cellulose Glencross et al. (2002) [21]
    Isonitrogenous feed 39% 30.8–32.50% 10.15–10.48% N/A n-3/n-6: 0.54–0.65 N/A 1.0% 1.0% Shrimp shell meal, corn grain Kangpanich et al. (2017) [22]
    39.18% 35.47% 6.91% N/A n-3/n-6: 0.69
    EPA/DHA: 0.81
    N/A 1.0% 2.5% Soybean lecithin, choline chloride, cellulose, squid paste, calcium phosphate, beer yeast cell, spray dried blood powder Li et al. (2020) [23]
    Shrimp Isonitrogenous feed 21% dry weight N/A 77.1–85.9% 3% N/A N/A 2.5% 2.0% Soy lecithin, antifungic, antioxidant (ethoxyquin), Vitamin E Martínez-Rocha et al. (2012) [24]
    30% 42.1% 6% 0.5% N/A N/A 1.0% 4.7% Lecithin, alpha cellulose, alginate, sodium hexametaphosphate Velasco et al. (1998) [25]
    35% N/A 8% 0.2% DHA: 0.5%
    ARA: 0.13%
    N/A 2.0% 0.5% Calcium phosphate dibasic, lecithin, StayC Samocha et al. (2010) [26]
    32.1% 48.1% 5.84% N/A N/A N/A 8.53% 8.53% Soybean lecithin, alginic acid Gonzalez-Galaviz et al. (2020) [27]
    40.08–42.93% 33.09–36.4% 7.37–8.39% 0.1% N/A N/A 0.5% 0.2% Lecithin, alginate Suresh et al. (2011) [28]
    34.2% to 36.3% dry weight 40.5% to 44.3% 3.9% to 6.0% dry weight N/A N/A N/A 1.8% 0.5% Choline chloride, Stay-C 35% active Galkanda-Arachchige et al. (2019) [29]
    36% N/A 8% 0.1% N/A N/A 1.8% 0.5% Choline chloride, Stay-C250 mg/kg, CaP-diebasic, lecithin, chromium oxide Fang et al. (2016) [30]
    42.2% N/A 9.1% 0.5% N/A N/A 2.0% 2.0% Calcium phosphate, soya lecithin Palma et al. (2008) [31]
    39.7% 30.7% 9.45% 0.16% N/A N/A 0.28% 0.28% Krill meal, monocalcium phosphate, lecithin Derby et al. (2016) [32]
    34.8% protein in feed with soy meal and 29.3% protein in feeds with FM 38.76% in feed with soy meal and 22.45% in feed with FM 6.65% in feed with soy meal and 5.84% in feeds with FM N/A N/A N/A 0.93% in feed with soy meal and 0.85% in feed with FM 0.93% in feed with soy meal and 0.85% in feed with FM Soy lecithin, alginic acid, cellulose, antioxidant Gil-Núñez et al. (2020) [33]
    35.8% to 36.6% dry weight 34.7% to 38.9% 7.9% to 8.1% 0.2% N/A N/A 0.5% 0.5% Lecithin-soy, methionine, lysine, titanium dioxide Weiss et al. (2019) [34]
    Isonitrogenous feed 40% dry weight N/A Isolipidic feed 9.00% dry weight 0.02% N/A N/A 1.2% 1.0% Lecithin powder 97%, amygluten Moniruzzaman et al. (2019) [35]
    Isonitrogenous feed 35% dry weight 31.93–32.78% 8.18–8.63% lipid N/A ARA:1.68%;
    EPA: 2.87%;
    DHA: 4.66%
    N/A 15% 25% Dicalcium phosphate, antifungal, antioxidant, lysine, methionine, garlic powder Tazikeh et al. (2019) [36]
    Isonitrogenous feed 36% crude protein N/A 7.9–9.00% lipid 0.11% N/A N/A 0.25% 0.25% Antioxidant, antifungic agent, Vitamin C, choline chloride, Gamboa-Delgado et al. (2019) [37]
    37% 38.32 to 38.88% 10% 0.5% N/A 1.46%
    (5% from 29.23% carotenoid extracted)
    1.0% 1.0% Monocalcium phosphate, cellulose Simião et al. (2019) [38]
    Crayfish Isonitrogenous with 39.02% to 39.74% dry weight 41.38% to 44.00% dry weight Isolipidic 7.03% to 7.53% dry weight 12.6% to 12.9% dry weight Saturated with 2.52% to 2.72% dry weight and unsaturated with 4.51% to 4.81% dry weight N/A N/A Sodium (1.4% to 1.5%), Calcium (3.3%) & Iron (0.7% to 1.3%) N/A Volpe et al. (2012) [39]
    Isonitrogenous (40% protein as-fed basis) 28.33% 7.03% 0% ARA: 1.09%
    EPA: 3.58%
    DHA: 7.94%
    N/A 2.0% 0.5% Lecithin, dicalcium phosphate, Vitamin C, choline chloride Thompson et al. (2003) [8]
    Crab 44.85% to 46.73% dry matter N/A 7% and 12% lipid 0.50% DHA/EPA ratio between 2.2 and 1.2 at 7% and 12% lipid, respectively N/A 1.00% 1.50% Monocalcium phosphate, choline chloride, cellulose Wang et al. (2021) [40]
    Isonitrogenous with 43.64 to 46.08% dry weight 17.2 kJ g−1 Dietary lipid level of 8.52–11.63% (op
    timum 9.5%)
    0.8% ARA: 0.5%;
    EPA: 6.9%; DHA: 6.1%
    N/A 3.00% 2.00% Lecithin, sodium alga acid, squid paste, cellulose Zhao et al. (2015) [41]
    Isonitrogenous feed with 45% crude protein N/A Isolipidic diets containing 9.5% oil (FO, lard, safflower oil, perilla seed oil or mixture oil 0.8% ARA: 0.5%;
    EPA: 14.1%;
    DHA: 11.7%
    N/A 3.00% 2.00% Lecithin, sodium alga acid, squid paste, cellulose Zhao et al. (2016) [42]
    46.9% to 47.03% dry weight N/A Isolipidic feed ~8% dry weight 0.50% N/A 0.009% β-carotene 1.50% 5.00% Cellulose, dextrin, lecithin Unnikrishnan and Paulraj (2010) [43]
    Isonitrogenous with 45% dry weight N/A Isolipidic with 10.8% dry weight 0.50% 0.13% ARA; 0.64–0.66% EPA & 0.37–0.38% DHA 0.009% β-carotene 1.50% 5.00% Cellulose, dextrin, lecithin Unnikrishnan et al. (2010) [44]
    32 to 40% dry weight 17.2 MJ kg−1 6% or 12% dry weight 0.1% N/A N/A 1.50% 0.50% Seaweed, soy lecithin, dicalphos Catacutan (2002) [45]
    Isonitrogenous 48.5% N/A 5.3 to 13.8% lipid dry weight 1.0% 0.36–0.4% ARA; 6.54–7.03% EPA; 2.29–2.81% 0.01% Astaxanthin 4.00% 4.00% Taurine, choline chloride, vitamin A, Vitamin D3, Vitamin E Sheen and Wu (1999) [46]
    46.6% protein dry weight N/A 8.6% lipid dry weight 0.51% N/A 0.01% Astaxanthin 4.00% 4.00% Taurine, choline chloride, vitamin A, Vitamin D3, Vitamin E Sheen (2000) [47]
    44.0–45.7% dry weight N/A 1.1% to 1.08% lipid dry weight 0.5% dry weight 0.2% ALA, 0.2% ARA, 0.2% DHA dry weight 0.01% Astaxanthin 4.00% 4.00% Taurine, choline chloride, vitamin A, Vitamin D3, Vitamin E Sheen and Wu (2002) [48]
    Lobster Isonitrogenous 53% dry weight N/A 10.04% 2% N/A 1% Carophyll pin (8% astaxanthin) 1.1% 0.6% Lecithin, Stay-C Marchese et al. (2019) [18]
    25% and 35% protein 23.75–24.73% 6.2–7% N/A N/A N/A 5% 5% Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Calcium carbonate, dicalcium phosphate Perera et al. (2005) [49]
    N/A: Not available. EFA: Essential Fatty Acid.

    4. Development of Formulated Feed for Juvenile Decapod

    4.1. Type of Formulated Feed

    There are two main types of feed processing technology that have been introduced in aquaculture: the extruded (pressured) pellet and the steam pellet. The extrusion technique involves the use of a feed extruder, whereby pellets are forced through a die using higher pressure and steam heat before being left to cool and having a vitamin and mineral premix added. The extrusion method is different from the steam pellet in that the extruder does not use any pellet binder to add adhesion to the particles [50], where they only expand through gelatinization of starch [51]. The gelatinization of starch helps to improve feed digestibility in decapods [52]. For this reason, the use of extruder feed is better than a steam pellet as it offers high stability and functional properties [53].

    4.1.1. Dry Pellet

    Dry pellets can be used in a variety of forms: dry-sinking pellet, extruded sinking pellet, and extruded floating pellet. Suitable feed ingredient selection, together with proper manufacturing procedures such as an extrusion or steaming process, ensures high-water stability pellets, which is the main criterion for producing high-quality feeds. Overall, dry-sinking pellets are more practical for bottom feeders [54] such as shrimp [55], prawns [50], lobsters [56], crayfish [8][39], and mud crabs [57]. Necessary for the creation of water-stable dry pellets are good binding agents and finely ground ingredients to ensure the maximum adhesion of the binder molecules.

    4.1.2. Moist Pellet

    Moist, or wet, pellets are soft pellets consisting of a combination of high-moisture ingredients and dry pulverized ingredients. The use of moist pellets led to high growth performance in juvenile rock lobsters (Jasus edwardsii) [58], freshwater crayfish [59], and green mud crabs [48]. Although the use of moist pellets is widely accepted among decapods, it is highly desirable to have the advantage of storage without the need for a refrigerator in order to prevent fungal growth and mold problems. This has led to the innovation of semi-moist pellets, which have been successfully developed at a laboratory scale. Compared to moist pellets, the moisture content of semi-moist pellets is lower, and under the permissible level to avoid yeast and mold growth, with the addition of chemical agents [60].

    4.2. Pellet Characteristics Requirement

    The success of decapod farming has highlighted the importance of physical pellet characteristics, which directly emphasizes the significance of artificial or formulated diets to replace live and fresh foods. The success of formulated feed may be controlled by the moisture content in the diet, which directly affects the physical forms. The high moisture content in the pellets is often associated with nutrient leaching since it dissociates easily upon entering the water. Apparently, the low pellet stability and durability resulting from high moisture content may not be suitable for decapods, partly because some species are aggressive in handling food [61]. In addition, the proper storage and handling of feed products may be difficult to achieve, as is the case with wet pellets. Since wet pellets have a high moisture content, rapid spoilage, such as from mold problems, is unavoidable during long storage periods [62]. Other physical pellet attributes, such as the palatability, type of binder, water stability, and durability, as well as buoyancy, are important to avoid pellet disintegration from decapods’ strong mastication and from long exposure to water.

    4.3. Current Status of Nutritional Research and Developments

    Many studies have evaluated adjustments to decapod crustacean feeding formulations by reducing the dependency on FM (protein source) and FO (lipid source). Recent research has explored the use of protein and lipid sources from various sources: terrestrial animal-based materials, plant-based materials, insect meal, food waste, and fishery and aquaculture byproducts [63]. The use of these alternative sources is often evaluated through several reliable indicators such as the voluntary feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER) in determining the effectiveness of the feed. Feed that uses both FO and FM ingredients has confirmed efficiency in decapod performance in terms of FCR (1.8) and PER (2.8) [33], and, thus, they have been used as a baseline to develop a new feed formulation that uses other protein and lipid sources.

    5. Conclusions

    The importance of good pellet physical characteristics in decapod feeding cannot be overemphasized in order to ensure that decapods meet their nutrient needs. The current development of decapod formulated feeds is focused on the juvenile stage. However, the unique feeding behaviors of adult decapods (slow feeding, bottom dwelling, and aggression when handling feed) are major challenges to developing a high-quality pellet for adult decapods. A high-quality pellet not only depends on the binding agent, but also on the attractants that enhance palatability, as well as the correct proportion of nutrients to boost decapod performance. However, most studies published on decapod nutrition lack data on the physical qualities of the feed. Thus, it is difficult to establish a standard feed formulation that focuses on the physical pellet properties.

    The entry is from 10.3390/ani11061761


    1. Waiho, K.; Glenner, H.; Miroliubov, A.; Noever, C.; Hassan, M.; Ikhwanuddin, M.; Fazhan, H. Rhizocephalans and Their Potential Impact on Crustacean Aquaculture. Aquaculture 2021, 531, 735876.
    2. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA): Sustainability in Action; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2020.
    3. Azra, M.N.; Ikhwanuddin, M. A review of maturation diets for mud crab genus Scylla broodstock: Present research, problems and future perspective. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 257–267.
    4. Wouters, R.; Lavens, P.; Nieto, J.; Sorgeloos, P. Penaeid shrimp broodstock nutrition: An updated review on research and development. Aquaculture 2001, 202, 1–21.
    5. Chimsung, N. Maturation diets for black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) broodstock: A review. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2014, 36, 265–273.
    6. Djunaidah, I.S.; Wille, M.; Kontara, E.K.; Sorgeloos, P. Reproductive performance and offspring quality in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) broodstock fed different diets. Aquac. Int. 2003, 11, 3–15.
    7. Hidir, A.; Aaqillah-Amr, M.A.; Noordiyana, M.N.; Ikhwanuddin, M. Diet and internal physiological changes of female orange mud crabs, Scylla olivacea (Herbst, 1796) in different ovarian maturation stages. Anim. Rep. Sci. 2018, 195, 216–229.
    8. Thompson, K.R.; Muzinic, L.A.; Christian, T.D.; Webster, C.D. Effect on growth, survival, and fatty acid composition of Australian red claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus fed practical diets with and without supplemental lecithin and/or cholesterol. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2003, 34, 1–10.
    9. Saleela, K.N.; Somanath, B.; Palavesam, A. Effects of binders on stability and palatability of formulated dry compounded diets for spiny lobster Panulirus homarus (Linnaeus, 1758). Indian J. Fish. 2015, 62, 95–100.
    10. Alberts-Hubatsch, H.; Lee, S.Y.; Meynecke, J.O.; Diele, K.; Nordhaus, I.; Wolff, M. Life-history, movement, and habitat use of Scylla serrata (Decapoda, Portunidae): Current knowledge and future challenges. Hydrobiologia 2016, 763, 5–21.
    11. Redzuari, A.; Azra, M.N.; Abol-Munafi, A.B.; Aizam, Z.A.; Hii, Y.S.; Ikhwanuddin, M. Effects of feeding regimes on survival, development and growth of blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) larvae. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 18, 472–478.
    12. Abol-Munafi, A.B.; Mukrim, M.S.; Amin, R.M.; Azra, M.N.; Azmie, G.; Ikhwanuddin, M. Histological profile and fatty acid composition in hepatopancreas of blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) at different ovarian maturation stages. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 16, 251–258.
    13. Taufik, M.; Bachok, Z.; Azra, M.N.; Ikhwanuddin, M. Effects of various microalgae on fatty acid composition and survival rate of the blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus larvae. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 2016, 45, 1512–1521.
    14. Ikhwanuddin, M.; Azmie, G.; Nahar, S.F.; Wee, W.; Azra, M.N.; Abol-Munafi, A.B. Testis maturation stages of mud crab (Scylla olivacea) broodstock on different diets. Sains Malays. 2018, 47, 427–432.
    15. Anger, K.; Harzsch, S.; Thiel, M. Developmental Biology and Larval Ecology: The Natural History of the Crustacean; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2020; Volume 7, Available online: https://books.google.com.my/books?id=surkDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 3 February 2021).
    16. Mane, S.; Deshmukh, V.D.; Sundaram, S. Fishery and behaviour of banana prawn, Fenneropenaeus merguiensis (de Man, 1888) around Mumbai waters. Int. J. Life Sci. 2018, 6, 549–556.
    17. Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Sun, Y.; Li, S.; Gao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, Q.; Lv, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. Penaeid shrimp genome provides insights into benthic adaptation and frequent molting. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 356.
    18. Marchese, G.; Fitzgibbon, Q.P.; Trotter, A.J.; Carter, C.G.; Jones, C.M.; Smith, G.G. The influence of flesh ingredients format and krill meal on growth and feeding behaviour of juvenile tropical spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus. Aquaculture 2019, 499, 128–139.
    19. Parra-Flores, A.M.; Ponce-Palafox, J.T.; Spanopoulos-Hernández, M.; Martinez-Cardenas, L. Feeding behavior and ingestion rate of juvenile shrimp of the genus Penaeus (Crustacea: Decapoda). J. Sci. 2019, 3, 111–113.
    20. Ayisi, C.L.; Hua, X.; Apraku, A.; Afriyie, G.; Kyei, B.A. Recent studies toward the development of practical diets for shrimp and their nutritional requirements. HAYATI J. Biosci. 2017, 24, 109–117.
    21. Glencross, B.D.; Smith, D.M.; Thomas, M.R.; Williams, K.C. Optimising the essential fatty acids in the diet for weight gain of the prawn, Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 2002, 204, 85–99.
    22. Kangpanich, C.; Pratoomyot, J.; Senanan, W. Effects of alternative oil sources in feed on growth and fatty acid composition of juvenile giant river prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). Agric. Nat. Resour. 2017, 51, 103–108.
    23. Li, L.; Wang, W.; Yusuf, A.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Ji, P.; Huang, X. Effects of dietary lipid levels on the growth, fatty acid profile and fecundity in the oriental river prawn, Macrobrachium nipponense. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 1893–1902.
    24. Martínez-Rocha, L.; Gamboa-Delgado, J.; Nieto-López, M.; Ricque-Marie, D.; Cruz-Suárez, L.E. Incorporation of dietary nitrogen from fish meal and pea meal (Pisum sativum) in muscle tissue of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) fed low protein compound diets. Aquac. Res. 2012, 44, 1–13.
    25. Velasco, M.; Lawrence, A.L.; Neill, W.H. Development of a static-water ecoassay with microcosm tanks for postlarval Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 1998, 161, 79–87.
    26. Samocha, T.M.; Patnaik, S.; Davis, D.A.; Bullis, R.A.; Browdy, C.L. Use of commercial fermentation products as a highly unsaturated fatty acid source in practical diets for the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 961–967.
    27. Gonzalez-Galaviz, J.R.; Casillas-Hernández, R.; Flores-Perez, M.B.; Lares-Villa, F.; Bórquez-López, R.A.; Gil-Núñez, J.C. Effect of genotype and protein source on performance of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 19, 289–294.
    28. Suresh, A.V.; Kumaraguru-vasagam, K.P.; Nates, S. Attractability and palatability of protein ingredients of aquatic and terrestrial animal origin, and their practical value for blue shrimp, Litopenaeus stylirostris fed diets formulated with high levels of poultry byproduct meal. Aquaculture 2011, 319, 132–140.
    29. Galkanda-Arachchige, H.S.C.; Guo, J.; Stein, H.H.; Davis, D.A. Apparent energy, dry matter and amino acid digestibility of differently sourced soybean meal fed to Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2019, 51, 326–340.
    30. Fang, X.; Yu, D.; Buentello, A.; Zeng, P.; Davis, D.A. Evaluation of new non-genetically modified soybean varieties as ingredients in practical diets for Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 2016, 451, 178–185.
    31. Palma, J.; Bureau, D.P.; Andrade, J.P. Effects of binder type and binder addition on the growth of juvenile Palaemonetes varians and Palaemon elegans (Crustacea: Palaemonidae). Aquac. Int. 2008, 16, 427–436.
    32. Derby, C.D.; Elsayed, F.H.; Williams, S.A.; González, C.; Choe, M.; Bharadwaj, A.S.; Chamberlain, G.W. Krill meal enhances performance of feed pellets through concentration-dependent prolongation of consumption by Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 2016, 458, 13–20.
    33. Gil-Núñez, J.C.; Martínez-Córdova, L.R.; Servín-Villegas, R.S.; Magallon-Barajas, F.J.; Bórques-López, R.A.; Gonzalez-Galaviz, J.R.; Casillas-Hernández, R. Production of Penaeus vannamei in low salinity, using diets formulated with different protein sources and percentages. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2020, 48, 396–405.
    34. Weiss, M.; Rebelein, A.; Slater, M.J. Lupin kernel meal as fishmeal replacement in formulated feeds for the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 26, 752–762.
    35. Moniruzzaman, M.; Damusaru, J.H.; Won, S.; Cho, S.J.; Chang, K.H.; Bai, S.C. Effects of partial replacement of dietary fish meal by bioprocessed plant protein concentrates on growth performance, hematology, nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 100, 1285–1293.
    36. Tazikeh, T.; Kenari, A.A.; Esmaeili, M. Effects of fish meal replacement by meat and bone meal supplemented with garlic (Allium sativum) powder on biological indices, feeding, muscle composition, fatty acid and amino acid profiles of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquac. Res. 2019, 51, 674–686.
    37. Gamboa-Delgado, J.G.; Morales-Navarro, Y.I.; Nieto-López, M.G.; Villarreal-Cavazos, D.A.; Cruz- Suárez, L.E. Assimilation of dietary nitrogen supplied by fish meal and microalgal biomass from Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) and Nannochloropsis oculata in shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei fed compound diets. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 2379–2389.
    38. Simião, C.D.S.; Colombo, G.M.; Schmitz, M.J.; Ramos, P.B.; Tesser, M.B.; Wasielesky, W., Jr.; Monserrat, J.M. Inclusion of Amazonian Mauritia flexuosa fruit pulp as functional feed in the diet for the juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2019, 51, 1731–1742.
    39. Volpe, M.G.; Varricchio, E.; Coccia, E.; Santagata, G.; Di-Stasio, M.; Malinconico, M.; Paolucci, M. Manufacturing pellets with different binders: Effect on water stability and feeding response in juvenile Cherax albidus. Aquaculture 2012, 324–325, 104–110.
    40. Wang, X.; Jin, M.; Cheng, X.; Hu, X.; Zhao, M.; Yuan, Y.; Sun, P.; Jiao, L.; Betancor, M.B.; Tocher, D.R.; et al. Dietary DHA/EPA ratio affects growth, tissue fatty acid profiles and expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in mud crab Scylla paramamosain supplied with appropriate n-3 LC-PUFA at two lipid levels. Aquaculture 2021, 532, 736028.
    41. Zhao, J.; Wen, X.; Li, S.; Zhu, D.; Li, Y. Effects of dietary lipid levels on growth, feed utilization, body composition and antioxidants of juvenile mud crab Scylla paramamosain (Estampador). Aquaculture 2015, 435, 200–206.
    42. Zhao, J.; Wen, X.; Li, S.; Zhu, D.; Li, Y. Effects of different dietary lipid sources on tissue fatty acid composition, serum biochemical parameters and fatty acid synthase of juvenile mud crab Scylla paramamosain (Estampador 1949). Aquac. Res. 2016, 47, 887–899.
    43. Unnikrishnan, U.; Paulraj, R. Dietary protein requirement of giant mud crab Scylla serrata juveniles fed iso-energetic formulated diets having graded protein levels. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 278–294.
    44. Unnikrishnan, U.; Chakraborty, K.; Paulraj, R. Efficacy of various lipid supplements in formulated pellet diets for juvenile Scylla serrata. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 1498–1513.
    45. Catacutan, M.R. Growth and body composition of juvenile mud crab, Scylla serrata, fed different dietary protein and lipid levels and protein to energy ratios. Aquaculture 2002, 208, 113–123.
    46. Sheen, S.S.; Wu, S.W. The effects of dietary lipid levels on the growth response of juvenile mud crab Scylla serrata. Aquaculture 1999, 175, 143–153.
    47. Sheen, S.S. Dietary cholesterol requirement of juvenile mud crab Scylla serrata. Aquaculture 2000, 189, 277–285.
    48. Sheen, S.S.; Wu, S.W. Essential fatty acid requirements of juvenile mud crab, Scylla serrata (Forskål, 1775) (Decapoda, Scyllaridae). Crustaceana 2002, 75, 1387–1401.
    49. Perera, E.; Fraga, I.; Carillo, O.; Díaz-Iglesias, E.; Cruz, R.; Báez, M.; Galich, G.S. Evaluation of practical diets for the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus (Latreille, 1804): Effects of protein sources on substrate metabolism and digestive proteases. Aquaculture 2005, 244, 251–262.
    50. Misra, C.K.; Sahu, N.P.; Jain, K.K. Effect of extrusion processing and steam pelleting diets on pellet durability, water absorbtion and physical response on Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Asian Australas J. Anim. 2002, 15, 1354–1358.
    51. Bandyopadhyay, S.; Rout, R.K. Aquafeed extrudate flow rate and pellet characteristics from low-cost single-screw extruder. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2001, 10, 3–15.
    52. Simon, C.J. Advancing the Nutrition of Juvenile Spiny Lobster, Jasus ewardsii, in Aquaculture. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2009. Available online: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm (accessed on 5 March 2021).
    53. Mohamad-Yazid, N.S.; Abdullah, N.; Muhammad, N.; Matias-Peralta, H.M. Application of starch and starch-based products in food industry. J. Sci. Tech. 2018, 10, 144–174.
    54. Lim, C.; Cuzon, G. Water stability of shrimp pellet: A review. Asian Fish. Sci. 1994, 7, 115–127.
    55. Obaldo, L.G.; Divakaran, S.; Tacon, A.G. Method for determining the physical stability of shrimp feeds in water. Aquac. Res. 2002, 33, 369–377.
    56. Kurnia, A.; Yusnaini, M.W.H.; Astuti, O.; Hamzah, M. Replacement of fish meal with fish head meal in the diet on the growth and feed efficiency of spiny lobster, Panulirus Ornatus under reared in sea net cage. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2017, 6, 34–38.
    57. Ahamad-Ali, S.; Syama-Dayal, J.; Ambasankar, K. Presentation and evaluation of formulated feed for mud crab Scylla serrata. Ind. J. Fish. 2011, 58, 67–73.
    58. Crear, B.J.; Thomas, C.W.; Hart, P.R.; Carter, C.G. Growth of juvenile southern rock lobsters, Jasus edwardsii, is influenced by diet and temperature, whilst survival is influenced by diet and tank environment. Aquaculture 2000, 190, 169–182.
    59. Ruscoe, I.M.; Jones, C.M.; Jones, P.L.; Caley, P. The effects of various binders and moisture content on pellet stability of research diets for freshwater crayfish. Aquac. Nutr. 2005, 11, 87–93.
    60. Paulraj, R. Handbook on Aquafarming: Aquaculture Feed. Manual; MPEDA: Cochin, India, 1993.
    61. D’Abramo, L.R. Challenges in Developing Successful Formulated Feed for Culture of Larval Fish and Crustaceans. In Proceedings of the Memorias del VI Simposium Internacional de Nutricion Acuicila, Mississippi, MS, USA, 3–6 September 2002; pp. 143–149.
    62. Cuzon, G.; Guillaume, J.; Cahu, C. Review: Composition, preparation and utilization of feeds for Crustacea. Aquaculture 1994, 124, 253–267.
    63. Hua, K.; Cobcroft, J.M.; Cole, A.; Condon, K.; Jerry, D.R.; Mangott, A.; Praeger, C.; Vucko, M.J.; Zeng, C.; Zenger, K.; et al. The future of aquatic protein: Implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 2019, 1, 316–329.