1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Bitumen Aging and Rejuvenation Chemistry

    Subjects: Engineering, Civil
    View times: 45
    Submitted by: Edoardo Bocci


    Bitumen aging and rejuvenation include a series of chemical transformations that the material undergoes and that results in the variation of its physical characteristics.

    1. Introduction

    Nowadays, the world is living through the most severe environmental crisis ever, due to biodiversity loss; air, soil, and water pollution; resource exhaustion; and disproportionate land use. To face these issues, the concepts of circular economy and sustainability are getting more and more attention by administrations, technicians, and researchers. Indeed, these topics have become important themes of research with a steep increase in the number of papers and journals [1]. One of the sectors that greatly contributes to the environmental impact is road construction, which entails the exploitation of raw materials, the emission of pollutants, and the generation of wastes [2].
    In the sector of road pavement engineering, the easiest way to promote the circular economy is to encourage the use of Reclaimed Asphalt (RAP). RAP is defined as removed and/or reprocessed pavement material composed of bitumen and aggregates. Four methods—hot in-plant recycling, hot in-place recycling, cold in-plant recycling, and cold in-place recycling—allow RAP recycling in new bituminous mixtures, determining the saving of virgin resources and the progressive cyclic reuse of this waste material, in a sustainable and circularly economic way [3].
    The most widespread method to recycle RAP is the hot in-plant technique, which allows both the aggregates and binder contained in the RAP to be exploited. Unfortunately, the aged, stiff, and brittle binder from the RAP increases the mixture stiffness and can therefore cause fatigue and low-temperature damages [4][5]. For this reason, road agencies usually limit the maximum amount of RAP that can be recycled in new hot mixes [6]. With the aim of solving this issue, many products worldwide have been used with the function of rejuvenating agents, which allow restoring (fully or partly) the mechanical properties that the RAP binder loses with aging [7].
    In the scientific literature, there are several studies concerning the aging and rejuvenation of bitumen. In particular, most of the studies are focused on how “improved” (in terms of performance or even environmental friendliness) bituminous binders behave with aging and when blended with aged bitumen from RAP. For instance, the use of polymer-modified bitumen is one of the hottest topics in this field [8]. Bitumen including elastomeric or plastomeric polymers experiences different changes with aging with respect to neat bitumen, as a function of the polymer type and content [9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover, it is a theme of research whether RAP including polymer-modified bitumen is as recyclable as the RAP containing neat bitumen, in terms of final mix performance and emission during mix production [14][15]. Another technique to increase the bitumen performance, which is actually investigated in terms of aging behavior, deals with the use of nanomaterials as modifiers, such as fumed silica, clay, diatomite, titanium dioxide, graphene, and carbon nanotubes [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, there are still some gaps of knowledge on the understanding of neat-bitumen-aging phenomena, particularly from a chemical point of view. Many researchers have been trying to fill these gaps in the last five years. As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, the search for the keywords “bitumen” (or “asphalt”, in the American dictionary) and “aging” or “rejuvenation” in the Scopus database has provided several occurrences when associated with chemical analyses. More than half of these publications come from Chinese authors (first author), but many studies have been carried out also in North America (the United States and Canada) and Europe.
    Figure 1. Origin of the papers indexed by Scopus in the period 2016–2021 on the theme of bitumen aging/rejuvenation chemistry.
    Table 1. Number of papers indexed by Scopus in the period 2016–2021 on the theme of bitumen aging/rejuvenation chemistry (date of the research 27 May 2021).
    Keywords Papers Published Since 2016
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Aging”, “AFM” 114
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Aging”, “Chemistry” 71
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Aging”, “Chromatography” 115
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Aging”, “FTIR” 395
    Total number of papers of bitumen aging chemistry 589
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Rejuvenation”, “AFM” 24
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Rejuvenation”, “Chemistry” 15
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Rejuvenation”, “Chromatography” 29
    “Bitumen/Asphalt”, “Rejuvenation”, “FTIR” 73
    Total number of papers on bitumen rejuvenation chemistry 121

    2. Bitumen Chemistry

    Bitumen is the visco-elasto-plastic material obtained through crude oil distillation. Basically, during this process, the various phases of the crude oil are separated due to the differences in their boiling and condensing temperatures [23]. A typical distillation process involves a first step in which the lighter components are separated, subjecting the crude oil to a temperature of about 350 °C at atmospheric pressure. The residue of the first step is subjected to a higher temperature, around 350–425 °C, under a controlled pressure ranging from 1 kPa to 10 kPa [24]. The residue of the second process is called straight-run bitumen [25]. Moreover, if the residue of this second process is subjected to another process of thermal distillation at temperatures between 455 °C and 510 °C, visbreaker bitumen is produced [26]. Vis-breaking allows refineries to reduce the amount of the residue produced, as it allows the further recovery of lighter products such as diesel and gas. This penalizes the quality of the bitumen that is obtained, which is more rigid, brittle, and susceptible to aging [27][28].

    2.1. Basic Characterization

    The bitumen composition is strictly related to the characteristics of the starting crude oil, particularly on its age and the depth from which it is extracted. The study of bitumen chemical composition is very tricky because it contains many chemical elements. Although bitumen is mainly composed of hydrogen (8–12% by weight) and carbon (80–88% by weight), which together give a hydrocarbon content of about 90%, heteroatoms as nitrogen (0–2% by weight), oxygen (0–2% by weight), and sulfur (0–9% by weight) are also present. Moreover, there can also be traces of heavy metals such as nickel and vanadium, in the order of hundreds of parts per million [29].
    The hydrocarbons (C+H) can be classified, according to the type of bond between the carbon atoms, into:
    • saturated: only simple bonds are present between the carbon atoms;
    • unsaturated: double or triple bonds are present.
    The heteroatoms (N, S, O) can be found in the correspondence of the unsaturated bonds. When combined with carbon, these can cause an imbalance of the electrochemical forces that gives polarity to the molecule. Therefore, the heteroatoms, despite being present in small percentages, have the ability to make the unsaturated molecules more active, influencing the bitumen rheological properties [30].

    2.2. Chemical-Structural Analysis—SARA Analysis

    To interpret bitumen properties from its chemistry, it is necessary to consider it on different scales and not only at a global level. In fact, bitumen can be described as several central structures consisting of polyaromatic assemblies containing a various number of molten rings, saturated polycyclic structures, and combinations. Saturated hydrocarbon side chains, which are characterized by different dimensions and patterns, are linked to these central assemblies. Therefore, the number of possible isomers is almost unlimited. This is the reason why bitumen is characterized by millions of different molecules and none of these are present in such a high quantity to isolate and characterize them. Therefore, a chemical-structural analysis is more useful and appropriate to understand bitumen composition and mechanical behavior [31].
    The chemical-structural analysis has progressed with fractionation techniques, through which it is possible to separate the bitumen molecules into chemical groups according to the dimensions or the soluble properties in various kinds of solvents (polar, apolar, or aromatic). Over the years, the fractionation techniques applied to bitumen have undergone a series of advances that have led to increasingly interesting results, clarifying more and more the structure of the material and therefore allowing a deeper understanding of the bitumen chemical composition.
    In 1836, Boussingault separated two components of bitumen by distillation. He obtained two fractions named “petrolenes” (85% by weight) and “asphaltene” (15% by weight). Given the similar H/C ratio of the two fractions, he thought that asphaltene could derive from the oxidation of petrolene [32]. A few decades later, Richardson made his contribution, defining “asphaltenes” as the part of the bitumen insoluble in naphtha but soluble in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). Moreover, he introduced the “carbeni” and the “carboids”, which are, respectively, soluble and insoluble in CS2 [33].
    Kayser, in 1897, used three solvents, chloroform, ether, and alcohol, to obtain three bitumen fractions [34]. Hoiberg achieved greater success in 1939 when he achieved the separation of the maltenes in resins (precipitate) and oils (soluble part) [35]. Corbett proposed a method to further split the maltenes and obtain three categories: saturated, aromatics, and resins [36]. Therefore, he managed to separate the bitumen into the four fractions that are still considered today in the chromatographic analysis: Saturated, Aromatic, Resins, and Asphaltenes (SARA); hence the SARA terminology is obtained by joining the initials of each fraction. Figure 2 summarizes the processes for SARA fraction separation.
    Figure 2. Bitumen composition (reprinted from Reference [37] with the permission of Elsevier).
    Nowadays, the process defined by ASTM D-4124 [38] is divided into several steps. The first consists of the separation of asphaltenes with precipitation of n-heptane. Afterward, the maltenes in a solution of n-heptane are poured into a chromatographic column to separate the saturates; then, the aromatics are separated using 100% toluene and a 50/50 blend of toluene and methanol; finally, the resins are obtained using trichloroethylene.
    Several methods are available to obtain the SARA fractions [39][40], but despite the proportions depending on the origins of the raw material, the use of different techniques gives slightly different results. Therefore, to compare different varieties of bitumen according to the SARA fractions, the use of the same fractionation method is always a good practice. A deeper description of the four distinct fractions is provided below.
    Saturates represent about 5–15% by weight of bitumen and consist of an almost transparent liquid. They are mainly composed of aliphatic (branched, linear, and cyclic hydrocarbons) and have no polarity (rare aromatic rings or polar atoms). They function as a jellying agent for bitumen components, as they favor asphaltene flocculation and therefore the bitumen solid-elastic phase.
    Aromatics represent about 30–45% by weight of bitumen and consist of a yellow-red oily liquid. They contain one or more aromatic rings and act as solvents for the peptized asphaltenes.
    Asphaltenes represent about 5–20% by weight of bitumen and consist of a dark powder [41]. They have many aromatic rings and polar compounds. They are the main component associated with bitumen stiffness and viscosity [42].
    Resins represent about 30–45% by weight of bitumen and consist of a black solid. They are similar to asphaltenes in terms of composition but they have a higher polarity [43]. They are the component that is associated with bitumen stability, as they behave as flocculent agents for the asphaltenes.
    The bitumen behavior is determined by the relative amount of the components, but especially by the compatibility and the interactions among these homogeneous fractions.

    3. Bitumen Aging

    Bitumen aging is defined as the series of chemical transformations that the material undergoes and that results in the variation of its physical characteristics [44]. In general, two different aging processes, namely short-term aging and long-term aging, are identified.
    Short-term aging is the phenomenon that bitumen suffers during HMA manufacturing (mixing, hauling, paving, and compacting) because of the high processing temperatures (>150 °C). Long-term aging is the phenomenon that affects bitumen during the entire service life of the mix, which is subjected to traffic and environmental stresses. The severity of this process is mainly related to the bitumen’s exposure to air, which depends on the mix air voids and the position of the HMA layer within the pavement structure [37].
    Despite some studies [45][46] that have identified several variables that affect bitumen aging, the most widely recognized mechanisms include:
    • Physical and steric hardening (reversible mechanisms);
    • Loss of low-weight components (volatiles) by evaporation;
    • Oxidation, with the consequent changes at the molecular level that cause a change in the SARA fractions.
    The oxidation and evaporation of volatiles, which are irreversible processes, are accelerated during the HMA production and paving when the bitumen is hot [47]. When the mix reaches the air temperature, the evaporation of volatiles becomes much less influential, while oxidation continues in the long-term aging. Furthermore, the greater importance of oxidation compared to that of physical hardening is given by the different nature of these processes: oxidation is irreversible, while physical hardening can be recovered. For these reasons, oxidation is considered the main process in the aging of bitumen.
    These mechanisms are described in detail in the following sections.

    3.1. Physical and Steric Hardening

    Physical hardening deals with the changes in the bitumen viscoelastic properties due to the material cooling below the glass transition region. However, the process does not entail any change in the chemical structure and is reversed when the bitumen is re-heated to air temperatures [48]. Assuming that the material volume consists of the volume of the oscillating molecules and the free volume between the molecules [49][50], when the bitumen temperature decreases, both molecular mobility and free volume reduces, maintaining the same proportion between occupied and free volume. When the glass transition temperature is reached, the free volume decrease becomes slower than the decrease of molecule oscillation, entailing a kind of “over-hardening” for the bitumen [51].
    Physical hardening should not be confused with steric hardening. Steric hardening is a chemical process in which the bitumen molecules rearrange and form wax compounds in the maltenes, due to the presence of linear alkanes in the asphaltenes [52]. The process happens at intermediate temperatures but takes three times longer than physical hardening [53]. Even steric hardening is reversible. While the former type of hardening occurs within 1–2 days at temperatures below the glass transition temperature of bitumens (−35/−15 °C), the latter is manifested at room temperature, and requires days or even weeks. The steric hardening is related to the inner reorganization of the binder molecules; it is associated with the formation of ordered structures by waxes in the maltenes phase that is influenced by the linear alkanes present in the asphaltenes fraction. It is a reversible process because it can be removed by heating or mechanical work [54].

    3.2. Evaporation of the Volatile Components

    The evaporation of saturated and aromatic components has been also reported as an aging mechanism of bitumen. In particular, this phenomenon is mainly related to short-term aging, as it depends on the temperature to which the bitumen is subjected during the mixing and installation phases [55]. It has been quantified that the loss of volatiles can be double for a temperature increase of 10 °C during HMA manufacturing at the plant [56]. The volatile evaporation causes the unbalancing of the SARA fractions, determining the predominance of resins and asphaltenes over saturates and aromatics. Consequently, the bitumen that results is harder, stiffer, more viscous, and more fragile. The evaporation of volatile compounds is an irreversible mechanism that significantly affects bitumen aging, even if to a lower extent than the oxidation process [57].

    3.3. Oxidation

    Thurston and Knowles, in 1941, demonstrated how bitumen components, in particular asphaltenes and resins, absorb oxygen [46]. It is widely accepted today to consider the oxidative process of bitumen as the most important mechanism that happens during aging.
    Bitumen oxidation is an irreversible process that deals with the “capture” of oxygen atoms by the bitumen components (particularly the asphaltenes), which undergo an alteration of their chemical characteristics. Moreover, this aging process could be photo-catalyzed in the case of the bitumen in pavement surface layers, in particular for polymer-modified binders [58]. As oxidation is due and depends on the access to oxygen in the mixture, the voids content, the HMA layer depth, the bitumen content, and the presence of cracking are factors that can influence the quantity of bitumen exposed, and therefore the quantity of potentially aged bitumen.
    Within bitumen morphology, oxidation includes dehydrogenation, the reaction of the alkyl sulfides into sulphoxides, and the reaction of the benzyl carbons into ketones, which in turn form carboxylic acids with dicarboxylic anhydride. These reactions can be quantitatively determined by functional group analysis through FTIR spectroscopy. A typical infrared spectrogram is shown in Figure 3. The absorbance bands around 1690 cm⁻¹ are due to the increase in C=O bonds (carbonyl groups)—for example, ketones, carboxylic acids, and anhydrides—while those around 1030 cm⁻¹ are due to the increase in S=O bonds (sulphoxide groups). Consequently, the peak areas of the two wavenumbers can be considered as concentration measurements of carbonyl compounds and sulphoxides, respectively [59].
    Figure 3. Effect of aging on bitumen FTIR spectrogram (reprinted from Reference [59] with the permission of Elsevier).
    It is important to highlight that the carbonyls, ketones, and sulfoxides generated through oxidation are characterized by a marked polarity. Therefore, they associate with the polar groups in the bitumen forming agglomerates with a high molecular weight [60]. These large and “heavy” clusters, which typically involve the asphaltene fraction, determine the reduction of the molecular mobility within the bitumen colloidal system, resulting in increased viscosity, stiffness, and brittleness [61].
    Temperature is a key factor in the oxidation phenomenon. In particular, the degree of oxidation is doubled every time the temperature increases by 10 °C (after 100 °C) [56]. The influence of temperature was also observed in the laboratory by Lu et al. [62]. They noted that it takes 4–8 longer times to obtain the same aging when the pressure aging vessel (PAV) temperature is decreased from 100 to 75 °C.
    As previously said, the oxidation reaction can be promoted and accelerated when the bitumen functional groups are excited by UV radiations. This issue has been neglected for many years as it only involves the upper pavement layer, because of the low ability of the radiations to penetrate in depth. However, the amplifying effect on the aging of the bituminous binder due to ultraviolet radiation should be considered, particularly in the most exposed surfaces of geographic regions characterized by high levels of solar radiation and humidity [63]. Many authors associated the increase in bitumen viscosity, as a consequence of oxidation, with the number of radiations that invested the material [64][65][66]. In particular, Zeng et al. [65] observed the detrimental effects of ultraviolet radiation in association with high temperatures in promoting oxidation. Afanasieva et al. [66] specified that bitumen is highly oxidized when subjected to radiations with a wavelength coinciding with the UVB range (280–315 nm).

    4. Bitumen Rejuvenation

    Including RAP in HMA requires a careful study of the mixture, because its mechanical properties are strongly conditioned by the presence of the aged bitumen contained in RAP. In particular, improper use of RAP can lead to premature cracking linked to the excessive stiffness of the bitumen (thermal and fatigue cracking) [67][68][69][70]. In order to achieve the proper mechanical properties for the HMA, additives are included in the mixture. In the following paragraph, the concept of rejuvenator is provided, clarifying which are the main distinctions within this category and explaining the benefits associated with their use.
    A rejuvenator is an agent that allows renovating the properties that the bitumen loses with aging [71]. Thus, rejuvenators should reduce aged bitumen viscosity and stiffness and improve ductility [72]. However, the many products that can be used for this aim may act at a different level, for example, in the colloidal system or the chemical morphology. The literature does not seem very clear about this; the term “rejuvenator” is often used for any additive, without specifying what the effective mechanisms of action in bitumen are. According to different authors [72][73][74], rejuvenators can be classified, based on the effect, as:
    • Softening agents (also called fluidifying agents or rheological rejuvenators), which include:
      ○ Incompatible softeners, which mainly have a viscosity lowering effect;
      ○ Soluble softeners, which restore the balance in the SARA composition by re-enriching the maltene fraction;
    • Real rejuvenators or compatibilizers, which help to renovate the physical and chemical characteristics of the bitumen through the disruption of the intermolecular associations between the asphaltenes.
    The softening agents are usually based on extracts of lubricating oils. Slurry oil, flux oil, and lube stock belong to this category. They include a proper content of maltenic, naphthenic, or aromatic components aiming to rebalance the SARA fractions of the aged binder, characterized by a lower concentration of maltenes. The softening agent allows an increase in bitumen ductility and a decrease in viscosity and brittleness by merely supplying oily components to maltene fraction, but does not achieve any change in the complex structure. The real rejuvenators are additives that allow restoring both the physical and chemical properties of bitumen. In particular, they are able to restore the agglomeration condition of asphaltenes to their original state by promoting their re-dispersion. Regarding their composition, real rejuvenators should have a high content of aromatics, which allows keeping the asphaltenes dispersed and maintains a low content of saturates, which have poor compatibility with the asphaltenes.
    The efficacy of the rejuvenation process is strictly related to the adequate dispersion within the aged bitumen. Lee et al. first faced this aspect, claiming that a mechanical mixing could allow a uniform distribution [75]. A few years before, Carpenter and Wolosick divided the diffusion of a rejuvenator into an aged binder into four different steps. In the first phase, the rejuvenator forms a low-viscosity layer around the particles of aggregates covered with aged bitumen. Then, the additive starts to penetrate the binder by softening it. In the third phase, the rejuvenator penetrates the aged bitumen, and the viscosity of the internal and external surfaces gradually decreases. Finally, in the last phase, over time, the rejuvenator manages to reach all the aged bitumen [76]. Noureldin and Wood [77] and Huang et al. [78] confirmed this theory some years later. Karlsson and Isacsson [79], found out that the diffusion of the rejuvenator into the aged bitumen is mainly influenced by the viscosity of the maltene phase. Therefore, it can be facilitated by raising the temperature or adding oil [80].

    4.1. Rejuvenators for Hot Recycled Mix Asphalt (HRMA)

    During the last decades, many studies have tried to estimate the efficacy of different rejuvenators. According to the literature, there are many different sources from which we can obtain rejuvenators. In general, according to their nature, rejuvenators can be classified as additives derived from oil and biological additives. For instance, Zaumanis et al. [81] and Dony et al. [82] stated that although the two categories may show differences, both additives can be used successfully to soften the aged bitumen and allow the fulfillment of the requirements in terms of penetration, softening point, and rheological characteristic.
    Besides fuels and bitumens, rejuvenators able to improve the properties of an aged binder are often produced from the processing of crude oil. These products include aromatic extracts, paraffinic oils, naphthenic oils, and spent motor oils [83]. These petroleum products have been the main agents used for many years to improve the characteristics of aged bitumen. In recent decades, research has moved towards finding materials with rejuvenating effects for aged bitumen that have lower costs and are environmentally sustainable. These are called bio-rejuvenators, and they are products such as tall oil, rapeseed oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, corn oil, used cooking oil, castor oil residues, and organic oils. Several studies promote these rejuvenators, highlighting that they are able to restore the original properties of bitumen, while being eco-sustainable at the same time.
    Among the numerous studies carried out during the last decades, the most relevant and suitable are reported hereafter, together with a brief description of the used rejuvenators and the main results.
    Bocci et al. [84][85] and Grilli et al. [86] focused on the evaluation of the mechanical and performance characteristics of HMA made with a high amount of RAP and a bio-rejuvenator. They found out that, using appropriate dosages of this additive, acceptable performance, similar to that reached with virgin materials, can be achieved. Thus, the evaluation of the correct dosage of rejuvenators plays a fundamental role in obtaining a mixture that can easily meet the specifications.
    Krol et al. [87] and Somé et al. [88] evaluated the effects of several vegetable oils (rapeseed oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, flaxseed oil) on the mechanical characteristics of bitumen and mixes. Furthermore, they also developed chemical processes to make new additives. These studies aimed to improve the performance of bituminous binders using only very cheap raw materials.
    Zargar et al. [89] studied the possibility of using waste cooking oil (WCO) as a rejuvenator in aged bitumen. They highlighted that by adding a specific dosage of this additive, the same values of penetration index, softening point, and viscosity of a virgin bitumen can be obtained. Moreover, increasing the amount of WCO, these properties can be further improved. Gökalp and Emre Uz [90] confirmed that using WCO leads to improvements in penetration index, viscosity, and fatigue resistance.
    During the last years, many studies have compared the effect of WCO with respect to waste engine oils (WEO) in restoring the original properties of an aged bitumen. In particular, Joni et al. [91] stated that the effect of WCO is greater than that of WEO on the properties of an aged binder; therefore, to obtain the same results, the required amount of WEO to be added is greater than that of WCO. Li et al. [92] confirmed that both WCO and WEO have rejuvenating properties, but WCO has higher efficacy than WEO, which implies the use of higher dosages. Moreover, Al Mamun et al. [93] investigated different contents of RAP and WCO/WEO rejuvenators. Differently from the previous studies, they noted that WEO allows a higher reduction of indirect tensile strength and stiffness with respect to WCO under the same dosage, but WCO allows a higher content of RAP to be recycled.
    The differences between bio-additives and aromatic additives were also studied from a molecular point of view by FTIR. Noor et al. [94] showed that using biological additives involves an increase of particular functional groups (C=O) in bitumen. Moreover, Cavalli et al. [95] stated that using rejuvenators such as seed oil or tall oil can increase the carbonyl and sulphoxide indices since they contain functional groups C=O and S=O. Investigating the performance of these indices is a good way to qualitatively understand the effects of a rejuvenating agent on an aged binder. Zhang et al. [96], through the analysis of the carbonyl, sulphoxide, and aromatic indices, assessed the degree of aging and rejuvenation of some mixtures including bio-additives.
    Zeng et al. [97] tested castor oil as a rejuvenating agent, and they found out that using this additive, it is possible to obtain an improvement of the rheological properties of the aged binder.
    The studies carried out by Elkashef et al. [98] and Nayak and Sahoo [99] focused on the use of soybean oil and Pongamia oil. They concluded that both products are good rejuvenators, capable of restoring the rheological properties that the binder lost with aging.
    Kehzen et al. [100] tried to evaluate tung oil (also called “China wood oil”) as an additive, showing how its addition improves the elasticity of an aged binder. In addition, with suitable amounts of tung oil, good performances of the mixture at high temperatures are also ensured.
    Several studies regard the effects of rejuvenators engineered and “built” in the laboratory. In particular, Zhang et al. [101] tested a rejuvenating agent made of rubber oil, plasticizers, and surfactants, and demonstrated that the blend of these ingredients allows the binder to recover the malleability and ductility lost during the aging processes. Rzek et al. [102] obtained a rejuvenator by modifying pyrolytic condensate of scrap tires with tire crumb. The results confirmed that the addition of this product improved the properties of the binder. Moreover, mechanical and rheological tests showed that the amount of RAP can reach up to 60% when this engineered rejuvenator is added to the mixture.
    Zaumanis et al. [81][103][104] tested the rejuvenating effect of many products of both biological and hydrocarbon nature, such as cotton seed oil, vegetable oil, used cooking oil, used motor oil, aromatic extract, distilled tall oil, distilled tall oil, exhausted motor oil, naphthenic oil, and aromatic extract.
    Radenberg et al. [105] carried out a study testing 21 different types of rejuvenators commonly used in the road sector; the products were distinguished between “rheologically effective” and “chemically effective”. While the former led to an increase in the maltenic phase, the latter reversed the effects of the oxidation process in the agglomerated compounds.
    Table 2 presents recent publications concerning the use of additives to rejuvenate the aged bitumen in RAP. For a correct understanding, a brief description of the nature of the additives tested is also included.
    Table 2. Most used additives, biological (green) and derived from oil (gold), used to rejuvenate aged bitumen.
    Additive Dosage * Description References
    Tall oil 4–20% Tall oil is an organic product deriving from the kraft process, a procedure for converting wood into wood pulp, the main component of the paper. It contains fatty acids, acid resins, and surfactants. [81][84][103][104][106][107]
    Exhausted vegetable cooking oil (mix of the main oils used for frying) 1–20% The chemical composition of these additives mainly contains fatty acids and methyl esters, with both oleophilic and hydrophilic properties. [94][89][90][92][93][103][104][108][109][110][111][112][113]
    Sunflower oil 5–9% It is the oil extracted from sunflower seeds. Contains triglycerides, with a high content of linoleic acid. It has a high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids. [87][88][95]
    Linseed oil 6–9% It is the oil obtained by squeezing previously dried or toasted flax seeds. It is mainly composed of triglycerides. It is one of the vegetable oils with the highest concentrations of acidolinolenic acid. [87][88]
    Soybean oil 6–9% It is obtained by extraction from soybeans through a special process called “crushing” with the use of chemical solvents. It too is mainly composed of triglycerides. [87][88][98]
    Rapeseed oil 1.5–9% It is a vegetable oil produced from rapeseed seeds. It occurs naturally in many varieties. The resulting oil, therefore, depends on the characteristics of the rapeseed from which it is extracted. The chemical composition includes fatty acids and methyl esters. [87][88][114]
    Castor oil 5–50% It is a very valuable vegetable oil, which is extracted from the seeds of the castor plant. It is mainly composed of acylglycerides, and the main fatty acid present is ricinoleic acid. [97][99]
    Pongamia oil 5–15% It is a fixed oil derived from the seeds of the Millettia pinnata tree. Typically, Pongamia oil is made up of glycerides, especially triglycerides. It is considered a fluxing agent rather than a rejuvenator. [99]
    Tung oil 2–8% Also called China wood oil, it is the oil extracted from Aleurites fordii seeds. It is mainly composed of triglycerides and is considered a drying oil, with extremely short polymerization times. [100]
    Cashew oil 5% It is an oil that derives from natural resins that fill the interstitial spaces of the honeycomb structure of the cashew shell. The resin is made up of 80–85% of anacardial acids (o-pentadeca dienylsalicylic acid) and the remaining fraction is cardol and methylcardol. [95]
    Corn oil 1.5–9% It is an oil extracted from the germs of the seeds of Zea mays, a graminaceous plant native to North America. It has a composition similar to sunflower oil, very rich in linoleic acid. It is mainly composed of triglycerides [115]
    Cotton seed oil 12% It is the vegetable oil extracted from the seeds of cotton plants. It is mainly composed of triglycerides. [81]
    Oleic acid 2.5–4.5% It is an 18-carbon monounsaturated carboxylic acid of the omega-9 series. In the form of triglyceride, it is an important component of animal fats, and is the most abundant constituent of the majority of vegetable oils. [116]
    Organic oil from wood waste 2–12.4% A very wide range of types of timber can be used, such as Red Maple, Magnolia, Balsam, Poplar, Linden, Beech and Pine. [117][118]
    Vegetable waste fat 12% Material composed of waste grease produced by catering processes. [103]
    Pig manure 2–10% It is the product of the fermentation of pig manure mixed with solid material used as bedding. [117][118][119]
    Algae additive 10% This is a bio-oil extracted from algae leaves or blooms through pyrolysis, and it is rich in phenolic compounds. [119]
    Waste engine oil 1–20% It is the waste lubricating oil used by engines. It is mainly produced from paraffinic oil. [81][82][91][92][93][104][120][121][122]
    Rubber powder from pyrolysis of used tires 5–12% Pyrolysis is a thermochemical decomposition process of organic materials, obtained by applying heat in the complete absence of an oxidizing agent. The pyrolytic product from tires pyrolysis contains high concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. [102][123]
    Aromatic extract 5–9% Aromatic extracts are refined products from crude oil and constitute one of the most traditional classes of rejuvenators. Their chemical structure includes aromatic polar rings. [81][104][124][125]
    Naphthenic oil 50–400% Naphthenic oils are high-quality pure naphthenic mineral bases, obtained by hydrogen refining of selected crude oil. [104]
    “Soft” bitumen 5% Bitumen with a high penetration value and low stiffness. It is typically classified as a fluxing agent since it does not restore the physical and chemical properties of the aged binder. However, this binder can lead to a decrease in bitumen blend viscosity. [126][127]
    * The dosages refer to the weight of the aged bitumen.

    4.2. Rejuvenating Mechanisms

    As previously explained, aging determines morphological changes in the bitumen: in particular, it causes more intense molecular interactions by introducing polar groups, which lead to an increase of the colloidal agglomerates into the bitumen volume. As the molecular structure strongly influences the rheological properties, any alteration of the balances and interactions of the polar and non-polar components in the bitumen can determine a modification of the thermal and mechanical properties in a mixture.
    From a chemo-morphological point of view, rejuvenation is the inverse process of aging. True rejuvenation breaks the molecular aggregations and rebalances the SARA fractions, leading to an improvement in the rheological properties of the bitumen [128]. Remembering the classification made in the previous section, real rejuvenators are additives capable of both replenishing the lost volatile components and flaking the large agglomerates of asphaltenes into much smaller compounds. The studies by Pahlavan et al. [119][128][129], which explain in detail the effect of rejuvenation in the aged bitumen morphology, are summarized hereafter.
    The approach adopted by Pahlavan et al. to investigate the rejuvenating process is based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and quantum mechanical studies through density functional theory (DFT). It starts from the analysis of the asphaltene monomer and the related oxidized dimer, which consists of a structure resulting from the interaction of two monomers of asphaltenes.
    The electrons of the C=O groups located around the oxidized asphaltenes (red dots in Figure 4) change the distribution of π electrons on these flat-shaped molecules. This determines an insufficiency of electrons at the π bonds in the central part of the asphaltenes with a consequent decrease of the repulsive forces between the asphaltenes. This decrease leads to the formation of the dimer (two asphaltene monomers).
    Figure 4. Asphaltene monomer (left) and dimer (right) molecular structures in the oxidized state (reprinted with permission from [119], Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society).
    The forces that control the degree of asphaltenes stacking are concentrated in the aromatic motifs present in the asphaltenes. Figure 5 shows the most probable sites of interaction between a rejuvenator and an asphaltene dimer. The zones A, B, and C represent the areas where the rejuvenator likely finds a lower opposition by the hydrocarbon chains when it approaches the dimer. In these regions, the rejuvenation process happens in two steps that the author named the “lock and key” step and “intercalating” step. The first step (“lock and key”) relates to zones A and B, where the adhesion between the asphaltenes in the dimer is stronger due to the polar groups. When the rejuvenator reaches the zones, it detaches the aromatic ring planes allowing access to more additive. In particular, the rejuvenator can intercalate in zone C, previously less accessible, and further deagglomerate the dimer by physically imposing a hindrance between the asphaltenes. The effectiveness of this second step depends on the chemistry of the rejuvenator. If the additive has polar properties, it creates interference on the Van der Waals forces that keep the polyaromatic cores stuck. However, the efficacy is higher if the additive has hydrocarbons with donor CH sites, which can interact with the π electrons in the asphaltenes and thus disrupt the bound of the dimer.
    Figure 5. More likely interaction sites for biological rejuvenator with an asphaltene dimer (reprinted with permission from [119], Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society).
    Of course, the rejuvenating effect of an additive is higher if it achieves both the steps, in particular, because the “intercalating” is noticeably facilitated when preceded by the “lock and key”.
    Figure 6 shows the side views of the dimer before and after rejuvenation. The simulation allowed observing an increase in the distance between the asphaltene sheets when the rejuvenator is used. In particular, in zones A and B (on the right in the side views), the increase of the gap between the polyaromatic cores was higher than in zone C (on the left in the side views).
    Figure 6. Intermolecular gaps between the aromatic rings in zones A/B and C for an oxidized dimer before (left) and after (right) rejuvenation. Blue and red numbers indicate the distances (in Å) achieved with two different rejuvenators (Reprinted with permission from [119], Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society).

    4.3. Laboratory Rejuvenating Assessment Methods: General Results

    As mentioned in the previous chapters, one way to evaluate the aging and rejuvenation of bitumen is to monitor the progress of the four SARA fractions. With oxidative aging, aromatics and resins are converted into asphaltenes leading to an increase in the contacts between the micelles in the colloidal system, increasing bitumen stiffness. The application of rejuvenators should increase the maltene content of the aged binder and consequently restore the proportions of the system.
    In this regard, Zadshir et al. [130] tested an aged bitumen (RTFOT and 2 PAV) rejuvenated using three additives of different natures: the first additive was based on organic oil from pig manure (BB), the second derived from vegetable oils (VB), and the third was hydrocarbon-based (PB). The chemical composition of the biological additive (BB) shows that it is characterized by a high content of asphaltenes and resins and a low content of saturates and aromatics (Figure 7). The high content of resins stabilizes the asphaltenes and the relative micelles of the colloidal system, but the addition of further asphaltenes is typically discouraged in favor of a higher content of aromatics. Despite the structure of bio-based asphaltenes being different from that of hydrocarbon-based asphaltenes [131], the lack of aromatics and abundance of asphaltenes do not tend to rebalance the SARA composition. Conversely, the vegetable oil (VB) additive shows a great content of resins and aromatics, with low percentages of saturated and asphaltenes. The high amount of aromatic components can balance the maltenic fraction lost during the aging process, causing an increase in the colloidal stability of the aged binder. Lastly, the hydrocarbon-based additive (PB) is characterized by a large percentage of aromatics and a lower percentage of asphaltenes in comparison to the biological binder (BB).
    Figure 7. SARA fractions of virgin binder, aged binder, additives, and rejuvenated binder: (a) biological additive, (b) vegetable oil, (c) hydrocarbon-based additive (reprinted from Reference [130] with the permission of Elsevier).
    The evolution of the percentages of the SARA fractions using these rejuvenators can also be analyzed by monitoring the Colloidal Index (CI). In particular:
    • Adding the biological rejuvenator (BB) (10% by weight) causes a decrease in the CI from 0.61 of the aged binder to 0.51 (bringing it back to values similar to that of virgin bitumen). However, by increasing the percentage of the same additive up to 30%, the index increases to the unit value (exceeding even that of the aged binder without additives);
    • Adding the vegetable-oil-based additive (VB), a progressive decrease in the index by increasing the percentage of rejuvenator occurs. This means that the stability of the binder is increased as the additive dosage increases. With an additive content of 30%, a CI lower than that of virgin bitumen is reached.
    • Adding the hydrocarbon-based rejuvenator (PB), the percentage of asphaltenes decreases and this leads to a slight decrease in the CI. Increasing the percentage of additive from 10% to 30%, there is not a further decrease.
    From the comparison between the three rejuvenators, it is clear that the content of resins and aromatics brought by the additives plays a fundamental role in the process. Resins are more effective than aromatics because of their high polarity and ability to disperse the asphaltenes micelles in the maltenic phase and consequently stabilize the colloidal system.
    A very important aspect to consider in the rejuvenating process is the amount of additive that has to be introduced into the aged bitumen to ensure the greatest benefit to the process. The results of CI help to find an optimal rejuvenator content for each type of additive. However, it has to be considered that for some products, as in the case of the biological additive, due to the different nature of the asphaltene molecules that compose it, the CI may increase with increasing rejuvenator dosage, but an improvement in physical and rheological behavior of the bitumen is still achieved.
    The same study [130] also investigated the molecular size distribution of the rejuvenated bitumens through GPC. The results show that:
    • the large molecules (LMS) increase from 83% for the non-aged binder to 87% for the aged binder, at the expense of the percentage of medium-sized molecules (MMS), which is reduced by 14% to 10%. The increase in LMS is a consequence of the increase in the number of asphaltenes in the system and their agglomeration.
    • the addition of a rejuvenator tends to decrease the percentage of larger LMS molecules by increasing the presence of medium-sized molecules (MMS).
    Further conclusions, related to the GPC test, were also obtained by Cao et al. [132], who tested the effects of waste cooking oil as a rejuvenator for aged bitumen. The main conclusions obtained in this study are the following:
    • The aged binder gets higher Mw and Mn values than the virgin one, denoting the formation of larger molecules in the binder during the aging process. Compared to the virgin bitumen, the higher poly-dispersion of the aged binder indicates that there is a greater distribution of molecular weights.
    • Adding waste cooking oil with different dosages, there is no chemical reaction between the additive and the aged binder. The decrease in Mw and the poly-dispersion is due to a physical dilution.
    Figure 8 shows the curves obtained by the GPC of the virgin, aged, and subsequently rejuvenated bitumen with different dosages of additive.
    Figure 8. GPC curves of the regenerated binder with different dosages of waste cooking oil (reprinted from Reference [132] with the permission of Elsevier).
    Compared to the virgin binder (red line), the aged one (black line) has a higher percentage of LMS compared to a lower small and medium-size molecules. Adding the waste cooking oil, the LMS tends to decrease; the typical LMS concentration of the virgin binder can be recovered by adding 20% additive. Increasing the percentage of waste cooking oil, MMS greatly increase and SMS decrease. However, the percentage of MMS and SMS cannot be brought back to the original values of the virgin binder. Therefore, it can be concluded that by adding waste cooking oil, the distribution of the molecular size cannot be totally restored.
    FTIR analysis can be used to investigate the evolution of the functional groups present in an aged binder when it is rejuvenated with additives. Referring to the study made by Cao et al. [132], hereafter, a picture showing the FTIR spectra of the waste cooking oil, the virgin binder, and the rejuvenated one is reported (Figure 9). Figure 10 shows the FTIR spectra of the functional groups S=O, C=O, and C-C in more detail. Additive and bitumen do not reach together during the rejuvenating process. In fact, the rejuvenated binder spectra are a union of those of the aged binder and the rejuvenator, without any new groups [113][133]. In terms of carbonyl index (IC=O) and sulphoxide index (IS=O), both increased with aging and were decreased by adding rejuvenators. This effect is related to the physical dilution of the binder.
    Figure 9. FTIR spectra of WCO (W-oil), virgin, and rejuvenated bitumen (reprinted from Reference [132] with the permission of Elsevier).
    Figure 10. FTIR spectra of S=O, C=O, and C-C (reprinted from Reference [132] with the permission of Elsevier).
    A study conducted by Noor et al. [94] focused on the analysis of the functional groups via FTIR when a biological or aromatic rejuvenator is added to a bituminous binder. Qualitative analyses were conducted by studying the spectra of the virgin bituminous binder, the biological additive, and the aromatic additive, in order to identify the representative functional groups. The functional groups identified in the bitumen are the same as those identified in the aromatic rejuvenator (both derived from petroleum). When the aromatic additive is added into the bitumen, there are no differences in the absorbance spectrum, as the functional groups are the same. On the other hand, when the biological rejuvenator is added, the resulting spectrum shows two distinct peaks in correspondence of the functional groups C=O (1744 cm−1) and C-O (1162 cm−1). Therefore, from the quantitative point of view, these bands can be a good reference for the identification of a specific biological rejuvenator in the bituminous binder.
    Recently, Menapace et al. [134] investigated the AFM images when adding tall oil to two different types of aged bitumen:
    • TOAS: blend of virgin and aged bitumen extracted from Recycled Asphalt Shingles (RAS) from re-roofing or roof removal projects;
    • MWAS: blend of virgin and aged bitumen extracted from RAS from the excess material obtained during the shingles’ production.
    Regarding the TOAS-type bitumen, after long-term aging, there is a significant increase in roughness and a decrease in the phase contrast of the colloidal structure (Figure 11). Bee structures appear in greater numbers but less defined than they were in virgin bitumen. The reduced size of the bee-shaped structures that have formed with aging indicates a relatively lower molecular mobility than for the virgin binder. Adding tall oil, there is a reduction of the dispersed domains and an increase of the matrix area. At the same time, a slight decrease in roughness and phase contrast are noted, and the bee structures are no longer visible. After re-aging (second PAV) of the rejuvenated binder, the surface of the matrix decreases, the roughness increases, the phase-contrast decreases, and some bee-shaped structures reappear. It is interesting to understand how the bee-shaped structures come out again after the PAV re-aging, while they are not present in the rejuvenated blend. It is possible to hypothesize that the species used for the construction of the bee domains require a certain molecule agglomeration to create bee-shaped structures. The rejuvenator lowers the degree of association, thus breaks the bee-shaped structures originally present. Aging, on the other hand, helps the molecules to cluster again and reform the bee-shaped structures.
    Figure 11. Height (above) and phase (below) images of aged TOAS binder (a), regenerated with tall oil (b) and re-aged (c) (reprinted from Reference [134] with the permission of Elsevier).
    In the MWAS bitumen, the long-term aging seems to form rippled structures that are slightly different from the typical bees (Figure 12). When the rejuvenator is used, the dispersed domains degenerate on the binder surface as if they were liquid, to form a single interconnected phase. The rippled structures are still present, and the overall surface roughness slightly increases, while the phase-contrast shows a small decrease. After a second long-term aging process, numerous bee-shaped structures appear on the surface (c). The edges of these structures are not as smooth as in the original ones, but show a more irregular conformation. This indicates that the molecules can hardly move and reach colloidal stability.
    Figure 12. Height (above) and phase (below) images of the MWAS aged binder (a), regenerated with tall oil (b) and re-aged (c) (reprinted from Reference [134] with the permission of Elsevier).
    In conclusion, the rejuvenator (tall oil), through the separation of the agglomerates formed by aging, allows the attenuation or even elimination of the bee-shaped structures, which, however, reappear when the binder ages again.
    More recently, Ganter et al. [135] tried to evaluate the evolution of the bee structures during the aging and rejuvenating steps. For this purpose, three different rejuvenators, coming from bio (R1, R2) and oil (R3) sources were used. A PmB 25/55-55 bitumen was first short- and long-term aged (RTFOT + PAV) and then rejuvenated with the three additives listed before. They highlighted that the virgin binder displays clear bee-like structures and with increasing aging, the number of bees rises. The interesting aspect is that the addition of the three different rejuvenators causes a very different change in the surface morphology of the bitumen: size and quantities of the bee-like structure differ completely as a function of additive type and origin.

    The entry is from 10.3390/su13126523


    1. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768.
    2. Ingrassia, L.P.; Lu, X.; Ferrotti, G.; Conti, C.; Canestrari, F. Investigating the “circular propensity” of road bio-binders: Effectiveness in hot recycling of reclaimed asphalt and recyclability potential. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120193.
    3. Zaumanis, M.; Mallick, R.B. Review of very high-content reclaimed asphalt use in plant-produced pavements: State of the art. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2015, 16, 39–55.
    4. Willis, J.R.; Turner, P.; Julian, G.; Taylor, A.J.; Tran, N.; De Padula, G.F. Effects of Changing Virgin Binder Grade and Content on Rap Mixture Properties; Report No. 12-03; National Center for Asphalt Technology(NCAT): Auburn, AL, USA, 2012.
    5. Bocci, E.; Prosperi, E. Analysis of different reclaimed asphalt pavements to assess the potentiality of RILEM cohesion test. Mater. Struct. 2020, 53, 1–14.
    6. Zaumanis, M.; Mallick, R.B.; Frank, R. 100% Hot Mix Asphalt Recycling: Challenges and Benefits. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 3493–3502.
    7. Tarsi, G.; Tataranni, P.; Sangiorgi, C. The challenges of using reclaimed asphalt pavement for new asphalt mixtures: A review. Materials 2020, 13, 4052.
    8. Polacco, G.; Filippi, S.; Merusi, F.; Stastna, G. A review of the fundamentals of polymer-modified asphalts: Asphalt/polymer interactions and principles of compatibility. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 224, 72–112.
    9. Wang, H.; Lu, G.; Feng, S.; Wen, X.; Yang, J. Characterization of Bitumen Modified with Pyrolytic Carbon Black from Scrap Tires. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1631.
    10. Celauro, C.; Saroufim, E.; Mistretta, M.C.; La Mantia, F.P. Influence of short-term aging on mechanical properties and morphology of polymer-modified bitumen with recycled plastics from waste materials. Polymers 2020, 12, 1985.
    11. Feng, Z.; Cai, F.; Yao, D.; Li, X. Aging properties of ultraviolet absorber/SBS modified bitumen based on FTIR analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 273, 121713.
    12. Sun, G.; Li, B.; Sun, D.; Yu, F.; Hu, M. Chemo-rheological and morphology evolution of polymer modified bitumens under thermal oxidative and all-weather aging. Fuel 2021, 285, 118989.
    13. Cuciniello, G.; Leandri, P.; Filippi, S.; Lo Presti, D.; Polacco, G.; Losa, M.; Airey, G. Microstructure and rheological response of laboratory-aged SBS-modified bitumens. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2021, 22, 372–396.
    14. Rodriguez-Fernandez, I.; Cavalli, M.C.; Poulikakos, L.M.B. Recyclability of asphalt mixtures with crumb rubber incorporated by dry process: A laboratory investigation. Materials 2020, 13, 2870.
    15. Lin, P.; Liu, X.; Apostolidis, P.; Erkens, S.; Ren, S.; Xu, S.; Scarpas, T.; Huang, W. On the rejuvenator dosage optimization for aged SBS modified bitumen. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 271, 121913.
    16. Liu, H.; Fu, L.; Jiao, Y.; Tao, J.; Wang, X. Short-Term Aging Effect on Properties of Sustainable Pavement Asphalts Modified by Waste Rubber and Diatomite. Sustainability 2017, 9, 996.
    17. Cheraghian, G.; Wistuba, M.P. Ultraviolet aging study on bitumen modified by a composite of clay and fumed silica na-noparticles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1121.
    18. Cheraghian, G.; Wistuba, M. Effect of Fumed Silica Nanoparticles on Ultraviolet Aging Resistance of Bitumen. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 454.
    19. Dell’Antonio Cadorin, N. Victor Staub de Melo, J.; Borba Broering, W.; Luiz Manfro, A.; Salgado Barra, B. Asphalt nanocomposite with titanium dioxide: Mechanical, rheological and photoactivity performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 289, 123178.
    20. Moretti, L.; Fabrizi, N.; Fiore, N.; D’andrea, A. Mechanical characteristics of graphene nanoplatelets-modified asphalt mixes: A comparison with polymer-and not-modified asphalt mixes. Materials 2021, 14, 2434.
    21. Han, M.; Muhammad, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, J.; Li, J. A review on the development and application of graphene based materials for the fabrication of modified asphalt and cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 285, 122885.
    22. Anwar, W.; Ahmad, N.; Khitab, A.; Faizan, M.; Tayyab, S.; Saeed, M.; Imran, M. Performance augmentation of asphalt binder with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 2021, 174, 130–141.
    23. Paliukaitė, M.; Vaitkus, A.; Zofka, A. Evaluation of bitumen fractional composition depending on the crude oil type and production technology. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Environmental Engineering, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22–23 May 2014.
    24. de Klerk, A. Unconventional Oil: Oilsands; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; ISBN 9780081028865.
    25. Giavarini, C. Stability of bitumens produced by thermal processes. Fuel 1981, 60, 401–404.
    26. Speight, J.G. Visbreaking: A technology of the past and the future. Sci. Iran. 2012, 19, 569–573.
    27. Giavarini, C. Visbreaker and straight-run bitumens. Fuel 1984, 63, 1515–1517.
    28. Giavarini, C.; Saporito, S. Oxidation of visbreaker bitumens. Fuel 1989, 68, 943–946.
    29. Mortazavi, M.; Moulthrop, J.S. The SHRP Materials Reference Library; SHRP Report A-646; Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; p. 228.
    30. Petersen, J.C. Chemical Composition of Asphalt As Related to Asphalt Durability: State of the Art. Transp. Res. Rec. 1984, 999, 13–30.
    31. Redelius, P.; Soenen, H. Relation between bitumen chemistry and performance. Fuel 2015, 140, 34–43.
    32. Boussingault, J.B. Mémoire sur la composition des bitumes. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1837, 64, 141–151.
    33. Richardson, C. The Modern Asphalt Pavement, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1910.
    34. Krishnan, J.M.; Rajagopal, K.R. Review of the uses and modeling of bitumen from ancient to modern times. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2003, 56, 149–214.
    35. Rostler, F.S. Fractional Composition: Analytical and Functional Significance. In Bituminous Materials: Asphalts, Tars, and Pitches; Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1965; Volume 2.
    36. Corbett, L.W. Composition of Asphalt Based on Generic Fractionation, Using Solvent Deasphaltening, Elution-Adsorption Chromatography, and Densimetric Characterization. Anal. Chem. 1969, 41, 576–579.
    37. Lesueur, D. The colloidal structure of bitumen: Consequences on the rheology and on the mechanisms of bitumen modification. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 145, 42–82.
    38. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D4124-09: Standard Test Method for Separation af Asphalt into Four Fractions; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
    39. Leroy, G. Bitumen analysis by thin layer chromatography (IATROSCAN). In Proceedings of the 4th Eurobitume Congress, Madrid, Spain, 4–6 October 1989.
    40. Ecker, A. The application of Iatroscan-technique for analysis of bitumen. Pet. Coal 2001, 43, 51–53.
    41. Speight, J.G. Petroleum asphaltenes. Part 1. Asphaltenes, resins and the structure of petroleum. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2004, 59, 467–477.
    42. Branthaver, J.F.; Petersen, J.C.; Robertson, R.E.; Duvall, J.J.; Kim, S.S.; Harnsberger, P.M.; Mill, T.; Ensley, E.K.; Barbour, F.A.; Scharbron, J.F. Binder Characterization and Evaluation—Volume 2: Chemistry; SHRP Report A-368; National Research Council: Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
    43. Koots, J.A.; Speight, J.G. Relation of petroleum resins to asphaltenes. Fuel 1975, 54, 179–184.
    44. Peralta, J.; Hilliou, L.; Silva, H.; Machado, A.; Pais, J.; Oliveira, J.R.M. Rheological quantification of bitumen aging: Definition of a new sensitive parameter. Appl. Rheol. 2010, 20, 63293.
    45. Traxler, R.R. Durability of asphalts cements. In Proceedings of the Asphalt Paving Technology, San Francisco, CA, USA, 18–20 February 1963; Volume 32, pp. 44–58.
    46. Thurston, R.R.; Knowles, E.C. Asphalt and Its Constituents. Oxidation at Service Temperatures. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1941, 33, 320–324.
    47. Miró, R.; Martínez, A.H.; Moreno-Navarro, F.; Rubio-Gámez, C. Effect of ageing and temperature on the fatigue behaviour of bitumens. Mater. Des. 2015, 86, 129–137.
    48. Hesp, S.A.M.; Iliuta, S.; Shirokoff, J.W. Reversible aging in asphalt binders. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 1112–1121.
    49. Struik, L. Physical Hardening in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978.
    50. Ferry, J.D. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
    51. Santagata, E.; Baglieri, O.; Dalmazzo, D.; Tsantilis, L. Experimental investigation on the combined effects of physical hardening and chemical ageing on low temperature properties of bituminous binders. In 8th RILEM International Symposium on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials; RILEM Bookseries; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 11, pp. 631–641.
    52. Tauste, R.; Moreno-Navarro, F.; Sol-Sánchez, M.; Rubio-Gámez, M.C. Understanding the bitumen ageing phenomenon: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 192, 593–609.
    53. Frolov, I.N.; Bashkirceva, N.Y.; Ziganshin, M.A.; Okhotnikova, E.S.; Firsin, A.A. The steric hardening and structuring of paraffinic hydrocarbons in bitumen. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 1675–1680.
    54. Fernández-Gómez, W.D.; Rondón Quintana, H.; Reyes, F. A review of asphalt and asphalt mixture aging. Ing. Investig. 2013, 33, 5–12.
    55. Bocci, E.; Prosperi, E.; Mair, V.; Bocci, M. Ageing and cooling of hot-mix-asphalt during hauling and paving—A laboratory and site study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8612.
    56. Hunter, R.; Self, A.; Read, J. The Shell Bitumen Handbook, 6th ed.; ICE Publishing: London, UK, 2015.
    57. Zupanick, M.; Baselice, V. Characterizing asphalt volatility. Transp. Res. Rec. 1997, 1586, 1–9.
    58. Petersen, J.C. Review of the Fundamentals of Asphalt Oxidation: Chemical, Physicochemical, Physical Property, and Durability Relationships; Transportation Research Circular Number E-C140; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
    59. Lu, X.; Isacsson, U. Effect of ageing on bitumen chemistry and rheology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2002, 16, 15–22.
    60. Cortés, C.; Pérez-Lepe, A.; Fermoso, J.; Costa, A.; Guisado, F.; Esquena, J.; Potti, J.J. Envejecimiento Foto-Oxidativo de Betunes Asfálticos. Comunicación 21; In Proceedings of the V Jornada Nacional ASEFMA. 2010, pp. 227–238. Available online: (accessed on 3 May 2021).
    61. Tarsi, G.; Varveri, A.; Lantieri, C.; Scarpas, A.; Sangiorgi, C. Effects of Different Aging Methods on Chemical and Rheological Properties of Bitumen. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018009.
    62. Lu, H.; Talon, Y.; Redelius, P. Aging of bituminous binders—Laboratory tests and field data. In Proceedings of the 4th Euroasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 22–23 May 2008; European Asphalt Pavement Association: Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
    63. Wu, S.; Pang, L.; Liu, G.; Zhu, J. Laboratory Study on Ultraviolet Radiation Aging of Bitumen. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2010, 22, 767–772.
    64. Martinez, G.; Caicedo, B. Asfalticas, Efecto de la radiacion ultravioleta en el envejecimiento de ligantes y mezclas. In Proceedings of the Congresso Ibero-Latinoamericano del Asfalto CILA XIII, San Josè de, Costa Rica, Costa Rica, 20–25 November 2005.
    65. Zeng, W.; Wu, S.; Wen, J.; Chen, Z. The temperature effects in aging index of asphalt during UV aging process. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 1125–1131.
    66. Afanasieva, N.; Alvarez, M.; Ortiz, M. Rheological characterization of aged asphalt. Ciencia Tecnol. Futur. 2002, 2, 121–134.
    67. Coleri, E.; Sreedhar, S. Strategies to Improve Performance of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement- Recycled Asphalt Shingle Mixtures. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2019, 22, 201–212.
    68. Mannan, U.A.; Islam, R.; Tarefder, R.A. Fatigue Behavior of Asphalt Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements Effects of recycled asphalt pavements on the fatigue life of asphalt under different strain levels and loading frequencies. Int. J. Fatigue 2015, 78, 72–80.
    69. Wu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, P.; Li, B.; Kang, A. Performance Characterization of Hot Mix Asphalt with High RAP Content and Basalt Fiber. Materials 2020, 13, 3145.
    70. Solanki, P.; Zaman, M.; Adje, D.; Hossain, Z. Effect of Recycled Asphalt Pavement on Thermal Cracking Resistance of Hot-Mix Asphalt. Int. J. Geomech 2015, 15, A4014001.
    71. Roberts, F.L.; Kandhal, P.S.; Brown, E.R.; Lee, D.Y.; Kennedy, T.W. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction, 2nd ed.; NAPA Research and Education Foundation: Lanham, MD, USA, 1996.
    72. Loise, V.; Caputo, P.; Porto, M.; Calandra, P.; Angelico, R.; Rossi, C.O. A review on Bitumen Rejuvenation: Mechanisms, materials, methods and perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4316.
    73. Tabatabaee, H.A.; Kurth, T.L. Analytical investigation of the impact of a novel bio-based recycling agent on the colloidal stability of aged bitumen. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2017, 18, 131–140.
    74. De Bock, L.; Vansteenkiste, S.; Vanelstraete, A. Categorisation and Analysis of Rejuvenators for Asphalt Recycling; Report No. 21; Belgian Road Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
    75. Lee, C.; Terrel, R.; Mahoney, J. Test for Efficiency of Mixing of Recycled Asphalt Paving Mixtures. In Transportation Research Record 911; TRB: Washington, DC, USA, 1983.
    76. Carpenter, S.; Wolosick, J. Modifier Influence in the Characterization of Hot-Mix Recycled Material. In Transportation Research Record 777; TRB: Washington, DC, USA, 1980.
    77. Noureldin, S.; Wood, L. Rejuvenator Diffusion in Binder Film for Hot-Mix Recycled Asphalt Pavement. In Transportation Research Record 1115; TRB: Washington, DC, USA, 1987.
    78. Huang, B.; Li, G.; Vukosavljevic, D.; Shu, X.; Egan, B. Laboratory Investigation of Mixing Hot-Mix Asphalt with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement. In Transportation Research Record 1929; TRB: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
    79. Karlsson, R.; Isacsson, U. Investigations on Bitumen Rejuvenator Diffusion and Structural Stability. Asph. Paving Technol. Assoc. Asph. Paving Technol. Tech. Sess. 2003, 72, 463–501.
    80. Oliver, J. Diffusion of Oils in Asphalts; Report No. 9; Proceedings of Australian Road Research Board: Vermont South, Victoria, Australia, 1975.
    81. Zaumanis, M.; Mallick, R.; Frank, R. Evaluation of different recycling agents for restoring aged asphalt binder and performance of 100% recycled asphalt. Mater. Struct. 2014, 48, 2478–2488.
    82. Dony, A.; Colin, J.; Bruneau, D.; Drouadaine, I.; Navarro, J. Reclaimed asphalt concretes with high recycling rates: Changes in reclaimed binder properties according to rejuvenating agent. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 41, 175–181.
    83. Behnood, A. Application of rejuvenators to improve the rheological and mechanical properties of asphalt binders and mixtures: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 171–182.
    84. Bocci, E.; Grilli, A.; Bocci, M.; Gomes, V. Recycling of high percentages of reclaimed asphalt using a bio-rejuvenator—A case study. In Proceedings of the 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 1–3 June 2016.
    85. Bocci, E.; Cardone, F.; Grilli, A. Mix design and volumetric analysis of hot recycled bituminous mixtures using a bio-additive. In Proceedings of the AIIT International Congress on Transport Infrastructure and Systems, Rome, Italy, 10–12 April 2017; pp. 267–274.
    86. Grilli, A.; Bocci, E.; Bocci, M. Hot recycling of reclaimed asphalt using a bio-based additive. In Proceedings of the 8th International RILEM-SIB Symposium, Ancona, Italy, 7–9 October 2015.
    87. Król, J.B.; Kowalski, K.J.; Niczke, L.; Radziszewski, P. Effect of bitumen fluxing using a bio-origin additive. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 194–203.
    88. Somé, C.; Pavoine, A.; Chailleux, E.; Andrieux, L.; DeMArco, L.; Philippe Da, S.; Stephan, B. Rheological behaviour of vegetable oil-modified asphaltite binders and mixes. In Proceedings of the 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress; Prague, Czech Republic, 1–3 June 2016.
    89. Zargar, M.; Ahmadinia, E.; Asli, H.; Karim, M. Investigation of the possibility of using waste cooking oil as a rejuvenating agent for aged bitumen. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 223, 254–258.
    90. Gökalp, I.; Emre Uz, V. Utilizing of Waste Vegetable Cooking Oil in bitumen: Zero tolerance aging approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116465.
    91. Joni, H.H.; Al-Rubaee, R.H.A.; Al-zerkani, M.A. Rejuvenation of aged asphalt binder extracted from reclaimed asphalt pavement using waste vegetable and engine oils. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2019, 11, e00279.
    92. Li, H.; Dong, B.; Wang, W.; Zhao, G.; Guo, P.; Ma, Q. Effect of Waste Engine Oil and Waste Cooking Oil on Performance Improvement of Aged Asphalt. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1767.
    93. Al Mamun, A.; Wahhab, A.H.I.; Dalhat, M.A. Comparative Evaluation of Waste Cooking Oil and Waste Engine Oil Rejuvenated Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45, 7987–7997.
    94. Noor, L.; Wasiuddin, N.M.; Mohammad, L.N.; Salomon, D. Use of Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy to Determine the Type and Quantity of Rejuvenator Used in Asphalt Binder. In Recent Developments in Pavement Engineering: Proceedings of the 3rd GeoMEast International Congress and Exhibition, Egypt 2019 on Sustainable Civil Infrastructures—The Official International Congress of the Soil-Structure Interaction Group in Egypt (SSIGE); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 70–84.
    95. Cavalli, M.C.; Zaumanis, M.; Mazza, E.; Partl, M.M.; Poulikakos, L.D. Effect of ageing on the mechanical and chemical properties of binder from RAP treated with bio-based rejuvenators. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 141, 174–181.
    96. Zhang, R.; You, Z.; Wang, H.; Ye, M.; Yap, Y.K.; Si, C. The impact of bio-oil as rejuvenator for aged asphalt binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 196, 134–143.
    97. Zeng, M.; Li, J.; Zhu, W.; Xia, Y. Laboratory evaluation on residue in castor oil production as rejuvenator for aged paving asphalt binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 189, 568–575.
    98. Elkashef, M.; Williams, R.C.; Cochran, E.W. Thermal and cold flow properties of bio-derived rejuvenators and their impact on the properties of rejuvenated asphalt binders. Thermochim. Acta 2019, 671, 48–53.
    99. Nayak, P.; Sahoo, U.C. A rheological study on aged binder rejuvenated with Pongamia oil and Composite castor oil. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2017, 18, 595–607.
    100. Kezhen, Y.; Yang, P.; Lingyun, Y. Use of tung oil as a rejuvenating agent in aged asphalt: Laboratory evaluations. Construct. Build. Mater. 2020, 239, 117783.
    101. Zhang, J.; Sun, H.; Jiang, H.; Xu, X.; Liang, M.; Hou, Y.; Zhanyong, Y. Experimental assessment of reclaimed bitumen and RAP asphalt mixtures incorporating a developed rejuvenator. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 215, 660–669.
    102. Rzek, L.; Ravnikar Turk, M.; Marjan, T. Increasing the rate of reclaimed asphalt in asphalt mixture by using alternative rejuvenator produced by tire pyrolysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 232, 117177.
    103. Zaumanis, M.; Mallick, R.B.; Poulikakos, L.; Frank, R. Influence of six rejuvenators on the performance properties of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) binder and 100% recycled asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 71, 538–550.
    104. Zaumanis, M.; Mallick, R.B.; Frank, R. Evaluation of rejuvenator’s effectiveness with conventional mix testing for 100% reclaimed asphalt pavement mixtures. Transp. Res. Rec. 2013, 2370, 17–25.
    105. Radenberg, M.; Boetcher, S.; Sedaghat, N. Effect and efficiency of rejuvenators on aged asphalt binder German experiences. In Proceedings of the 6th Eurasphalts and Eurobitume Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 1–3 June 2016.
    106. Bearsley, S.R.; Haverkamp, R.G. Age hardening potential of tall oil pitch modified bitumen. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2007, 8, 467–481.
    107. Mokhtari, A.; David Lee, H.; Williams, R.C.; Guymon, C.A.; Sholte, J.P.; Schram, S. A novel approach to evaluate fracture surfaces of aged and rejuvenator-restored asphalt using cryo-SEM and image analysis techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 133, 301–313.
    108. Hugener, M.; Partl, M.N.; Morant, M. Cold asphalt recycling with 100% reclaimed asphalt pavement and vegetable oil-based rejuvenators. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2014, 15, 239–258.
    109. Maharaj, R.; Harry, V.; Mohamed, N. The rheological properties of Trinidad asphaltic materials blended with waste cooking oil. Prog. Rubber Plast. Recycl. Technol. 2015, 31, 265–279.
    110. Asli, H.; Ahmadinia, E.; Zargar, M.; Karim, M.R. Investigation on physical properties of waste cooking oil—Rejuvenated bitumen binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 37, 398–405.
    111. Osmari, P.H.; Aragao, F.T.S.; Leite, L.F.M.; Simao, R.A.; da Motta, L.M.G.; Kim, Y.-R. Chemical, microstructural, and rheological characterization of binders to evaluate aging and rejuvenation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2017, 2632, 14–24.
    112. Azahar, W.N.A.W.; Jaya, R.P.; Hainin, M.R.; Bujang, M.; Ngadi, N. Chemical modification of waste cooking oil to improve the physical and rheological properties of asphalt binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 126, 218–226.
    113. Gong, M.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, H.; Tong, T. Physical-chemical properties of aged asphalt rejuvenated by bio-oil derived from biodiesel residue. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 105, 35–45.
    114. Kowalski, J.K.; Krol, B.J.; Bankowski, W.; Radziszewski, P.; Sarnowski, M. Thermal and fatigue evaluation of asphalt mixtures containing RAP treated with a bio-agent. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 216.
    115. Zhao, K.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, F. Diluting or dissolving? The use of relaxation spectrum to assess rejuvenation effects in asphalt recycling. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 188, 143–152.
    116. Ali, A.W.; Mehta, Y.A.; Nolan, A.; Purdy, C.; Bennert, T. Investigation of the impacts of aging and RAP percentages on effectiveness of asphalt binder rejuvenators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 110, 211–217.
    117. Borghi, A.; Jimenez del Barco Carrion, A.; Lo Presti, D.; Giustozzi, F. Effects of laboratory aging on properties of biorejuvenated asphalt binders. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2017, 29, 1–3.
    118. Yang, X.; Mills-Beale, J.; You, Z. Chemical characterization and oxidative aging of bio-asphalt and its compatibility with petroleum asphalt. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1837–1847.
    119. Pahlavan, F.; Samieadel, A.; Deng, S.; Fini, E. Exploiting Synergistic Effects of Intermolecular Interactions to Synthesize Hybrid Rejuvenators to Revitalize Aged Asphalt. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15514–15525.
    120. Farooq, M.A.; Mir, M.S.; Sharma, A. Laboratory study on use of RAP in WMA pavements using rejuvenator. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 168, 61–72.
    121. Fernandes, S.R.M.; Silva, H.M.R.D.; Oliveira, J.R.M. Recycled stone mastic asphalt mixtures incorporating high rates of waste materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 187, 1–13.
    122. Romera, R.; Santamaria, A.; Pena, J.; Munoz, M.; Barral, M.; Garcia, E.; Janez, V. Rheological aspects of the rejuvenation of aged bitumen. Rheol. Acta 2006, 45, 474–478.
    123. Avsenik, L.; Klinar, D.; Tušar, M.; Perše, L.S. Use of modified slow tire pyrolysis product as a rejuvenator for aged bitumen. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 605–616.
    124. Mogawer, W.S.; Austerman, A.; Roque, R.; Underwood, S.; Mohammad, L.; Zou, J. Ageing and rejuvenators: Evaluating their impact on high RAP mixtures fatigue cracking characteristics using advanced mechanistic models and testing methods. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2015, 16 (Suppl. 2), 1–28.
    125. Garcia, A.; Schlangen, E.; van de Ven, M.; Sierra-Beltran, G. Preparation of capsules containing rejuvenators for their use in asphalt concrete. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184, 603–611.
    126. Ameri, M.; Mansourkhaki, A.; Daryaee, D. Evaluation of fatigue behavior of high reclaimed asphalt binder mixes modified with rejuvenator and softer bitumen. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 191, 702–712.
    127. Chen, J.-S.; Chen, S.-F.; Liao, M.-C.; Huang, S.W. Laboratory evaluation of asphalt blends of recycling agents mixed with aged binders. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2015, 27, 04014143.
    128. Pahlavan, F.; Hung, A.M.; Zadshir, M.; Hosseinnezhad, S.; Fini, E.H. Alteration of π-Electron Distribution to Induce Deagglomeration in Oxidized Polar Aromatics and Asphaltenes in an Aged Asphalt Binder. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 6554–6569.
    129. Pahlavan, F.; Mousavi, M.; Hung, A.M.; Fini, E.H. Characterization of oxidized asphaltenes and the restorative effect of a bio-modifier. Fuel 2018, 212, 593–604.
    130. Zadshir, M.; Oldham, D.J.; Hosseinnezhad, S.; Fini, E.H. Investigating bio-rejuvenation mechanisms in asphalt binder via laboratory experiments and molecular dynamics simulation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 190, 392–402.
    131. Xu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, F.; Yan, Y. Molecular structure models of asphaltene in crude and upgraded bio-oil. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2014, 37, 5.
    132. Cao, X.; Wang, H.; Cao, X.; Sun, W.; Zhu, H.; Tang, B. Investigation of rheological and chemical properties asphalt binder rejuvenated with waste vegetable oil. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 180, 455–463.
    133. Chen, A.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, J. Research on the aging and rejuvenation mechanisms of asphalt using atomic force microscopy. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 177–184.
    134. Menapace, I.; Garcia Cucalon, L.; Kaseer, F.; Arámbula-Mercado, E.; Epps Martin, A.; Masad, E.; King, G. Effect of recycling agents in recycled asphalt binders observed with microstructural and rheological tests. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 61–74.
    135. Ganter, D.; Mielke, T.; Maier, M.; Lupascu, D.C. Bitumen rheology and the impact of rejuvenators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 222, 414–423.