1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Large-Scale Geothermal Collector Systems

    View times: 20
    Contributors: Robin Zeh , Björn Ohlsen , Nikola Jocic
    Submitted by: Robin Zeh


    A Geothermal collector system is a ground heat exchanger connected to a heat pump which provides heating energy from the ground for buildings. A Large-scale geothermal collector systems differ from small systems, which are usually built for individual buildings, in their size and complexity. Typical large-scale geothermal collector systems supply entire settlements with heating and cooling energy via 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling (5GDHC) by using the very Shallow Geothermal Potential (vSGP). They can also be constructed in multiple horizontal layers.

    1. Very Shallow Geothermal Potential (vSGP)

    The 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling (5GDHC) networks aspire to connect to renewable energy sources[1], including geothermal sources[2]. Shallow geothermal sources are suitable for application regarding 5GDHC networks. They are generally defined by depth and encompass those energy achieved from the sources up to 400 m[3]. Sources from shallower depths are more practical to exploit as shown in figure 1.

    Very shallow, shallow and deep geothermal potential classification

    Figure 1:Very shallow, shallow and deep geothermal potential classification[4]

    Very Shallow Geothermal Potentials (vSGPs) are those acquired by depth less than 10 m[5]. This depth range relevant for very shallow geothermal systems can be divided further into three layers: 0–3 m, 3–6 m, and 6–10 m[6], which differ by physical soil properties. The thermal properties of soil are the crucial parameters that affect heat extraction of the very shallow geothermal systems. These properties such as thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity and heat capacity are strongly affected by the physical soil parameters - bulk density, water content, and soil texture defined by grain size distribution[7][8]. Climate factors, such as solar irradiation and precipitation, also have a certain influence on vSGP. Heat input from the earth’s interior (terrestrial heat flow) is negligible in the shallower soil layers. However, the influence of terrestrial heat flow becomes more important in the regeneration behavior of the soil with increasing depth, while the influence of solar irradiation is the opposite.

    The vSGP systems are principally horizontally installed geothermal systems that utilize the heat potential on the earth’s surface rather than at depth. These are horizontal ground heat exchangers, such as geothermal collectors in the classic single pipe installation or tube mats, but also special designs such as trench collectors, heat baskets, and comparable modular collector systems up to a maximum depth of 10 m. Horizontal ground heat exchangers have advantages in lower installation costs and lower drilling technology requirement, therefore are widely used in engineering. When sufficient ground area is available, horizontal ground heat exchangers provide a very effective solution for heating and cooling.

    2. Definition Large-Scale Geothermal Collector Systems (LSC)

    A very shallow large-scale geothermal collector system (LSC) is distinguished from smaller systems in particular by its size and performance[4]. Typical large-scale geothermal collector systems supply entire settlements with heating and cooling energy via 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling (5GDHC)[2] by using the very Shallow Geothermal Potential (vSGP). There are also large-scale geothermal collector systems that are built below the buildings[9]. The following parameters describe the large-scale geothermal collector classification. At least one of the criteria shown in Figure 2 needs to be fulfilled:

    • ≥1.000 m2 area
    • ≥25 kW maximum source power
    • ≥50 MWh/y source heat extraction

    Representation and definition of large-scale collector systems (LSC)

    Figure 2: Representation and definition of large-scale collector systems (LSC)[4]

    Large-scale geothermal collector systems differ from small systems, which are usually built for individual buildings, in their size and complexity. They can also be constructed in multiple horizontal layers. Due to the large number of pipelines and distribution shafts, the pressure loss must always be taken into account in detail and optimized for the system, so that all pipelines are evenly flown through with heat transfer medium and thus, an even heat extraction can be guaranteed. Within the large-scale geothermal collector system, the mutual influence of the individual collectors, which affects the heat extraction behavior, also comes into play. This requires more detailed planning, usually with the help of simulation programs.

    Previous LSC’s usually consist of modular trench collectors, distribution shafts and an energy center. The advantage of modular trench collectors is that the pressure loss is known and stays the same for all modules within the system. In multilayer geothermal collector systems, the collector layers are usually connected separately. This means that every layer can be controlled separately during operation in order to guarantee targeted use of the advantages of the multi-layer system (seasonal heat and cold storage).

    3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Large-Scale Geothermal Collector Systems

    The advantage of the area development down to a depth of a few meters lies in the high regeneration potential through the climate, primarily the solar irradiation. Thus, over short periods of time, heat can be extracted from the soil to below the freezing point of the moisture present in the soil. In this way the heat energy, which is released in the phase transformation from water to ice, is tapped by the large-scale geothermal collector (LSC). The cooled soil is naturally regenerated again by solar irradiation and precipitation. Subsequently, the supplied regeneration heat can be extracted from the soil again in the next heating season. For natural regeneration through the climate, it is important that solar irradiation and precipitation can enter the soil as unhindered as possible.

    It is almost impossible to cool the surrounding soil of a large geothermal single-layer collector at a depth of 1.5–2 m with the heat extraction for the heat supply of classical heat applications to such an extent that it cannot be regenerated again over the summer months at a location in temperate latitudes (four seasons, sufficient precipitation)[10]. The situation is different with heat baskets where a massive block of ice can form in the center that cannot be regenerated naturally, without the supply of thermal energy (usually in the form of waste heat). The same applies to multilayer collector systems (e.g., frozen soil storage), since the natural regeneration is “shut off” by solar irradiation and precipitation from the uppermost collector layer. However, this effect can also be exploited by deliberately generating excessive cooling of individual areas in order to provide cooling energy for residential buildings, office complexes or industrial applications and to use the heat released in the process of regeneration of the frozen areas[11].

    Another advantage of large-scale geothermal collector systems is the low efficiency loss due to mutual influences. Efficiency losses may occur in the center of an LSC system, but regeneration is always ensured due to regeneration by the surface conditions (solar irradiation and precipitation) and only to a lesser extent by the terrestrial heat flow. Finally, it should be mentioned that the yield of geothermal collectors can be estimated accurately in advance since analyses of the upper soil layers can be carried out easily and at a low cost[7].

    The main disadvantage of the very Shallow Geothermal Potential (vSGP) to the shallow systems is that their heat potential is subject to seasonal fluctuations, which means that the lowest natural geothermal potential is available in winter. Geothermal systems using the vSGP tap the soil all around the plant, which is why the area demand is often higher than the demand for other geothermal systems.

    4. Application Scenarios of Large-Scale Collector Systems

    A large-scale geothermal collector (LSC) system is in constant competition or even in combination with other sustainable forms of heat supply such as ground heat exchangers, solar thermal energy, biomass or waste heat sources (industrial waste heat, wastewater heat, etc.). A large-scale geothermal collector is a good choice, especially if the overall system can be operated at a low temperature level via 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling (5GDHC) and not every building can have its own heat source, e.g., due to space constraints. If larger open areas are available during the development of the building area, an LSC can be considered. It can be placed, for example, below a rainwater retention basin, below sports fields, in compensation areas or in agricultural areas, in order to enable dual use of the areas. If the large-scale geothermal collector is operated via 5GDHC, it can provide both heating and cooling energy for the settlement.

    The drilling of borehole heat exchanger systems is usually subject to special legal approval requirements, which are checked in advance. In some countries it may be prohibited to develop a vertical heat exchanger via a borehole for reasons of groundwater protection or due to mining law requirements. In the case of large-scale geothermal collector systems, requirements under licensing law must also be checked. However, the requirements are usually much less stringent and can be met. Thus, the development of settlements with regenerative low-temperature heat can usually be carried out in areas with a special legal situation.

    A large-scale geothermal collector can act as an intermediate storage unit in a 5GDHC. Low-temperature waste heat from industrial processes or from a wastewater heat exchanger can also be integrated. Seasonal load peaks, both in generation and consumption, can be temporarily stored within an LSC and then provided as needed.

    The entry is from 10.3390/su13116035


    1. Henrik Lund; Sven Werner; Robin Wiltshire; Svend Svendsen; Jan Eric Thorsen; Frede Hvelplund; Brian Vad Mathiesen; 4th Generation District Heating (4GDH). Energy 2014, 68, 1-11, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089.
    2. Marcus Brennenstuhl; Robin Zeh; Robert Otto; Ruben Pesch; Volker Stockinger; Dirk Pietruschka; Report on a Plus-Energy District with Low-Temperature DHC Network, Novel Agrothermal Heat Source, and Applied Demand Response. Applied Sciences 2019, 9, 5059, 10.3390/app9235059.
    3. Stefanie Hähnlein; Peter Bayer; Grant Ferguson; Philipp Blum; Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy. Energy Policy 2013, 59, 914-925, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.040.
    4. Robin Zeh; Björn Ohlsen; David Philipp; David Bertermann; Tim Kotz; Nikola Jocić; Volker Stockinger; Large-Scale Geothermal Collector Systems for 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling Networks. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6035, 10.3390/su13116035.
    5. D. Bertermann; H. Klug; L. Morper-Busch; C. Bialas; Modelling vSGPs (very shallow geothermal potentials) in selected CSAs (case study areas). Energy 2014, 71, 226-244, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.054.
    6. Nikola Jocić; Johannes Müller; Tea Požar; David Bertermann; Renewable Energy Sources in a Post-Socialist Transitional Environment: The Influence of Social Geographic Factors on Potential Utilization of Very Shallow Geothermal Energy within Heating Systems in Small Serbian Town of Ub. Applied Sciences 2020, 10, 2739, 10.3390/app10082739.
    7. David Bertermann; Hans Schwarz; Laboratory device to analyse the impact of soil properties on electrical and thermal conductivity. International Agrophysics 2017, 31, 157-166, 10.1515/intag-2016-0048.
    8. Hans Schwarz; David Bertermann; Mediate relation between electrical and thermal conductivity of soil. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources 2020, 6, 1-16, 10.1007/s40948-020-00173-x.
    9. Hahn, J.; Lauterbach, S.; Jensch, W. Netzdienliche Quartiere—Von der Konzeption bis zum Betrieb. In INUAS Konferenz Urbane Transformationen; HM Hochschule München: München, Germany, 2021; pp. 50–53.
    10. Stäudinger, V.; Jensch, W.; Stockinger, V. ErdEis-Erdeisspeicher und Oberflächennahe Geothermie. Hochschule München, 2019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334988393 (accessed on 5 May 2021).
    11. Hauke Hirsch; Hans Petzold; John Grunewald; Efficiency and area demand of multi-layer ground heat exchanger using phase change of water. MATEC Web of Conferences 2019, 282, 02027, 10.1051/matecconf/201928202027.