Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Several industries can use only one compound from seaweed and the science is evolving to understand how the seaweeds’ metabolism works, to obtain the best amount of the compound in aquaculture. Subsequently, the seaweed aquaculture technologies have been + 9992 word(s) 9992 2020-11-23 09:26:20 |
2 update layout and reference -4695 word(s) 5297 2020-11-23 12:30:00 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Pacheco, D.; Araújo, G.S.; Cotas, J.; Gaspar, R.; Neto, J.M.; Pereira, L. Invasive Seaweeds. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3167 (accessed on 27 April 2024).
Pacheco D, Araújo GS, Cotas J, Gaspar R, Neto JM, Pereira L. Invasive Seaweeds. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3167. Accessed April 27, 2024.
Pacheco, Diana, Glacio Souza Araújo, João Cotas, Rui Gaspar, João M. Neto, Leonel Pereira. "Invasive Seaweeds" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3167 (accessed April 27, 2024).
Pacheco, D., Araújo, G.S., Cotas, J., Gaspar, R., Neto, J.M., & Pereira, L. (2020, November 23). Invasive Seaweeds. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3167
Pacheco, Diana, et al. "Invasive Seaweeds." Encyclopedia. Web. 23 November, 2020.
Invasive Seaweeds
Edit

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), an “invasive alien species” is an exotic species that establishes itself in a natural or semi-natural ecosystem or habitat, becoming an agent of change and a threat to diversity native biological.

Therefore, invasive species are those capable of successfully reproducing and forming self-sufficient populations in an ecosystem that is not theirs. When this happens, we say that they have "naturalized", which can have disastrous consequences for native (native) species.

Some invasive alien species are unable to survive and reproduce on their own, so they end up disappearing from the ecosystem and do not endanger native biodiversity. In this case, they are not considered invasive species, only introduced.

non-indigenous seaweed species marine invasions Food and pharmaceutical uses

1. Introduction

Seaweeds' ecological relevance has been acknowledged by the scientific community through the assessment of the ecosystem services they provide, which directly or indirectly support human well-being, namely regulating, provisioning, and cultural services [1][2].

Algae play a pivotal regulatory role in the aquatic environment, being sources of primary and secondary production, providing protection to coastal zones, and as nursery areas [3]. Moreover, seaweeds are a food source for many aquatic organisms, supporting provisioning services for a wide range of invertebrates [4]. Furthermore, seaweeds are part of cultural heritage and distinctiveness in each area, presenting economic value for society [5].

However, these ecosystems are currently under threat due to climatic changes, such as ocean acidification or the increasing seawater temperature [6]. Despite that, anthropogenic pollution nodes are major stressors that affect the structure and functioning of aquatic environments. For instance, eutrophication is a phenomenon provoked by the discharge of effluents with a high inorganic load (i.e., phosphorus, nitrogen, nitrate, nitrite) that can lead to eutrophication. Thus, the excess of nutrients will lead to the occurrence of algal blooms, giving an advantage to opportunistic algae that will affect the structure of the community and its primary productivity [7]. Regarding the available resources, non-indigenous species (NIS) usually are more effective when using them than native species [8]. However, NIS presence can have negative, positive, or neutral effects on the ecosystems where they are integrated [9]. Still, the introduction of exotic species in marine ecosystems can often lead to severe changes in ecosystem functioning. Among the vectors which favored the introduction of exotic seaweeds related to marine traffic rising [10] are, namely, through the discharge of ballast waters and biofouling on recreational boats or cargo ships hulls [11][12][13]. Another possible introduction vector is associated with the aquaculture, importation, and commercialization of marine organisms, namely mollusks [14]. Moreover, it is still found exotic and/or invasive species commercially available in the European aquarium trade markets, such as Caulerpa racemosa and Caulerpa taxifolia [15].

Whenever exotic seaweed species are introduced in a different geographic area and if the biotic and abiotic conditions allow it, these species can exhibit an invasive behavior. Moreover, a set of characteristics are needed to consider it an invasive seaweed species, commonly related to opportunistic traits such, such as a fast growth rate, dynamic life cycle, high recruitment rate, physiology, size, and fitness [3][16][17][18]. However, the intrinsic mechanisms associated with the biologic invasion's success are not yet fully understood due to their complexity [3]. For these reasons, macroalgal marine invaders are considered a threat to coastal and estuarine environments.

The Iberian Peninsula macroalgal community has also been a target of the introduction of several exotic seaweed species (Table 1), in which some of them are well established, exhibiting a widespread distribution in this area and invasive behavior.

Table 1. Exotic seaweed species recorded in the Iberian Peninsula. R–Rhodophyta; O–Ochrophyta; C–Chlorophyta.

Phylum

Species

Spain

Portugal

Native Habitat

References

R

Acrothamnion preissii (Sonder) E.M. Wollaston 1968

x

 

Australia

[19]

R

Agardhiella subulata (C. Agardh) Kraft and M.J. Wynne 1979

x

 

Canada

[20]

R

Agarophyton vermiculophyllum (Ohmi) Gurgel, J.N. Norris (formerly Gracilariopsis vermiculophylla Ohmi et Fredericq 2018)

x

x

Japan

[20][21]

R

Asparagopsis armata Harvey 1855

x

x

Australia

[20][22][23]

R

Asparagopsis taxiformis (Delile) Trevisan 1845

x

x

Australia

[22][23][24]

R

Bonnemaisonia hamifera Hariot 1891

x

x

Japan

[21]

R

Botryocladia wrightii (Harvey) W.E. Schmidt, D.L. Ballantine and Fredericq 2017 (formerly Chrysymenia wrightii (Harvey) Yamada 1932)

x

x

Japan

[20][21]

R

Callithamniella flexilis Baardseth 1941

x

 

Stoltenhoff Island (South Atlantic)

[20]

R

Contarinia squamariae (Meneghini) Denizot 1968 (formerly Wormskioldia squamariae Meneghini)

 

x

-

[21]

R

Dasya sessilis Yamada 1928

x

x

Japan

[21]

R

Dasysiphonia japonica (Yendo) H.–S. Kim 2012

x

 

Japan

[21]

R

Falkenbergia rufolanosa (Harvey) F. Schmitz 1897

x

x

Australia

[20][25]

R

Gracilariopsis chorda (Holmes) Ohmi 1958

x

 

Japan

[26]

R

Grateloupia filicina (J.V. Lamouroux) C. Agardh 1822

x

x

Australia

[21]

R

Grateloupia subpectinata Holmes 1912

x

x

Japan

[20][21]

R

Grateloupia turuturu Yamada 1941

x

x

Japan

[21]

R

Gulsonia nodulosa (Ercegovic) Feldmann and G. Feldmann 1967

 

x

Adriatic

[21]

R

Kapraunia schneideri (Stuercke and Freshwater) A.M. Savoie and G.W.Saunders 2019 (formerly Polysiphonia schneideri B. Stuercke and D.W. Freshwater)

x

 

North America (North Carolina)

[21]

R

Lomentaria hakodatensis Yendo 1920

x

x

Japan

[20]

R

Lophocladia lallemandii (Montagne) F. Schmitz 1893.

x

 

Egypt (Suez channel)

[21]

R

Melanothamnus harveyi (Bailey) Díaz-Tapia and Maggs 2017 (formerly Neosiphonia harveyi (Bailey) M.-S. Kim, H.-G. Choi, Guiry and G.W. Saunders 2001)

x

x

North America (Connecticut)

[20][21]

R

Pachymeniopsis lanceolata (K. Okamura) Y. Yamada ex S. Kawabata 1954

x

 

Japan

[27]

R

Polysiphonia morrowii Harvey 1857

x

 

Japan or Korea

[20]

R

Pyropia suborbiculata (Kjellman) J.E. Sutherland, H.G. Choi, M.S. Hwang and W.A. Nelson 2011

x

x

Japan

[20][21]

R

Scageliopsis patens E.M. Wollaston 1981

x

x

Australia

[20][21]

R

Symphyocladia marchantioides (Harvey) Falkenberg 1897

 

x

New Zealand

[20][21]

R

Womersleyella setacea (Hollenberg) R.E. Norris 1992

x

 

Hawaii

[21]

O

Colpomenia peregrina Sauvageau 1927

x

x

Pacific coast of North America

[23]

O

Dictyota cyanoloma Tronholm, De Clerck, A. Gómez-Garreta and Rull Lluch 2010

x

 

Australia

[19]

O

Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt 1955

x

x

Japan

[21]

O

Scytosiphon dotyi M.J. Wynne 1969

 

x

North America (California)

[21]

O

Stypopodium schimperi (Kützing) Verlaque and Boudouresque 1991

x

 

Egypt (Sinai Peninsula)

[21]

O

Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar 1873

x

x

Japan

[21]

O

Zosterocarpus oedogonium (Meneghini) Bornet 1890

 

x

Mediterranean

[19]

C

Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskål) J. Agardh 1873

x

 

Australia

[21]

C

Caulerpa taxifolia (M. Vahl) C. Agardh 1817

x

 

India

[19]

C

Caulerpa cylindracea Sonder 1845

x

 

Australia

[19]

C

Codium arabicum Kützing 1856

 

x

Egypt

[19]

C

Codium fragile subsp. fragile (Suringar) Hariot 1889

x

x

Japan

[21]

C

Ulva australis Areschoug 1854

x

 

Japan

[21]

Against this scenario, it urges the need to mitigate the impacts of seaweeds invasions in coastal and estuarine ecosystems, prioritizing the mapping of exotic seaweed species and comprehend the mechanisms which allow the success or failure of the invasion in order to take control and conservation measures [17][28][29].

Among the several adaptative advantages of invasive seaweeds, their high growth rate makes them suitable to feedstock supply for industrial exploitation.

2. Invasive Seaweeds: An Important Feedstock to Food Industry

2.1. Red Seaweeds

In marine ecosystems, seaweeds that belong to the phylum Rhodophyta constitute a wide taxonomic diversity [30]. Among the exotic seaweeds registered on the Iberian Peninsula, Pyropia suborbiculata (Kjellman) (J.E. Sutherland, H.G. Choi, M.S. Hwang and W.A. Nelson 2011 it is an Asiatic Bangiales), due to its high tolerance to the variation of physico-chemical conditions, is now widespread throughout the American, Australian, and European shoreline [31][32][33]. However, the first records of P. suborbiculata in the Atlantic Ocean were misidentified with Neopyropia yezoensis M.S. Hwang and H.G. Choi (formerly Pyropia yezoensis) [34]. Through molecular analysis, in 2005, it was possible to genetically distinguish these two seaweed species [35]. More recently, researchers found that P. suborbiculata is well established on the Iberian Peninsula and is genetically similar to the population from the Pacific Ocean, suggesting that the presence of this exotic seaweed in the Northwest Atlantic is probably through marine shipping [31][36]. In contrast, P. suborbiculata is produced through aquaculture and is authorized and considered safe for human consumption in the United States of America [37][38]. In fact, this seaweed can have a significant role in the daily diet (Figure 1) and can be used fresh or dried, milled, and then utilized as a flavor enhancer [39].

Figure 1. Seaweed (Pyropia sp.) pie with carrot and coconut.

However, it is in the Asiatic region that this seaweed currently assumes a high economic interest, being considered an important marine crop for food feedstock [40][41]. In these countries, seaweeds which belongs to Pyropia/ Porphyra/ Neopyropia genus are highly consumed by the population [42]. Therefore, P. suborbiculata is also a potential candidate for food industry feedstock due to its protein (11.2% DW), lipids (0.3% DW), and carbohydrates (31.6% DW) content [43].

The health benefits that this food resource presents, lead to increased customer demand, which allowed a sales volume increase and the global economic expansion of Pyropia/Porphyra commercialization [44].

Thus, Pyropia/Porphyra/Neopyropia spp. farming became essential to guarantee the feedstock. However, these cultivations are frequently affected by fungal diseases. For instance, the fungi Pythium porphyrae provokes the most concerning disease (red rot disease) in Asiatic Pyropia aquacultures [45][46], causing seaweed blades destruction, precluding the entire cultivation, and leading to serious economic losses [47]. Nevertheless, studies showed that P. suborbiculata is more resistant to P. porphyrae fungal attack [48], thus being a potential candidate for food supply through their cultivation.

Another introduced red seaweed native from Japan, Agarophyton vermiculophyllum (Ohmi) Gurgel, J.N. Norris et Fredericq 2018 (previously known as Gracilaria vermiculophylla) (Figure 2), has invaded estuaries throughout the whole world. Although the presence of this algae was underrated in several areas due to the morphological similarity with native species Gracilaria gracilis [49], many signs of progress have been made through genetic analysis in order to distinguish them [50][51].

Figure 2. Agarophyton vermiculophyllum collected in an aquaculture fish tank at Ria de Aveiro (Portugal).

In Europe, some authors defend that this seaweed was unintentionally introduced through Japanese oysters farming, migrating birds, or shipping [50]. Since then, this species is well established in the Iberian Peninsula because they can tolerate abiotic parameters variation such as temperature (11–25 °C) and salinity (10–30 PSU) [50]. Due to this species resilience, they are recognized by their environmental and ecological impact on fauna and flora [4][52][53].

From a nutritional perspective, A. vermiculophyllum is rich in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids (22.2 mg/kg DW and 4 mg/kg DW, respectively) [54]. They also have interesting phosphorus (0.082–0.203%) and nitrogen (2.27–4.68%) content [55].

For this reason, this seaweed already had shown to be a low-cost tool to supplement animal feed to improve aquaculture fish nutritional profile and their organoleptic quality. For instance, researchers found out that adding only 5% of A. vermiculophyllum on rainbow trout feed increase fish iodine levels and improve fillet color and texture [56].

However, this agarophyte seaweed also indirectly contributes to the food industry. Agar is a phycocolloid highly valuable for this sector. In this red seaweed, agar content can reach up to 30% of their dry weight [57] and it could be incorporated in food products as gelling, stabilizing, and encapsulating agent due to its rheological properties [58][59]. Furthermore, agar biofilm enriched with A. vermiculophyllum extract can be used in edible fruits and vegetables, maintaining properties such as color and light gloss up [58].

More recently, aiming for plastic waste reduction, A. vermiculophyllum was used to develop sustainable fish packaging [60]. In this study, the extracts from this seaweed were applied to allow the antimicrobial activity of the fish packaging [60] Furthermore, seaweeds can contribute to innovation in the food sector while contributing to food security [61].

Grateloupia turuturu Yamada 1941 (Figure 3) shows a resilient behavior, presenting a high reproduction rate and tolerating a wide range of temperatures (4–29 °C) and salinity (22–37 PSU), thus threatening several native seaweeds [62]. Therefore, this seaweed native from Japan currently exhibits a cosmopolitan distributional pattern [14]. However, until 2002, the taxonomic identification of G. turuturu was misidentified with Grateloupia doryphora (Montagne), whereas a research group was able to distinguish them through molecular techniques [63]. Hence, the first occurrence of this seaweed in Europe was in 1982 and was observed in the Iberian Peninsula in the early 1990s [64]. The authors hypothesize that this species was introduced through their biofouling capacity on hulls or oyster shells [14].

Figure 3. Underwater photography of Grateloupia turuturu in Buarcos Bay (Figueira da Foz, Portugal).

Despite the records of the direct consumption of G. turuturu in Asian countries [65], the full nutraceutical potential of this seaweed is still unrevealed in Europe. However, some researchers are focused on their chemical composition and their bioactivities. G. turuturu is an edible seaweed that already contributes to food demand due to their protein (22% DW), lipid (2% DW), dietary (60% DW), insoluble fibers (12% DW), and sterols content [65][66][67][68]. It is also important to highlight the concentration of phycoerythrin (0.30% DW) and phycocyanin (0.033% DW) [67]. Besides that, this macroalgae is also a source of essential amino acids such as histidine (1.8 g protein-N), leucine (6.3 g protein-N), tryptophan (0.7 g protein-N), lysine (4.3 g protein–N), methionine (2 g protein-N), phenylalanine (3.7 g protein-N), threonine (3 g protein-N), and valine (4.9 g protein-N) [66][69].

Researchers evaluated the nutritional profile of this red seaweed in Portugal [70] (Table 2) and demonstrated that the most abundant macronutrients are sodium (Na) and potassium (K), exhibiting 96.08 and 20 mg/g DW, respectively. While magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P) were found at a concentration ranging 2–2.81 mg/g DW. Regarding the micronutrient concentration, most representatives were zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe), while the other trace elements analyzed presented a vestigial concentration (Table 3).

In fact, the daily intake of these elements is extremely important to the human body and guarantees good metabolic functions [71]. For instance, a study conducted by Pang et al. (2006) [72] with G. turuturu collected in China showed that this edible red seaweed can be a human health promoter through their antibacterial activity against Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Table 2. Asparagopsis taxiformis nutritional characterization from biomass collected in different sampling sites. ND–Non-determined.

Harvesting Site

Lipids

Proteins

Carbohydrates

Ash

Moisture

Reference

Madeira Archipelago

(% DW)

 

6.62

23.76

32.47

N.D.

4.50

[73]

Hawaii (%)

 

4

6.1

13.2

36

90.03

[74]

Egypt

(% DW)

0.4

0.5

17.9

ND

ND

[75]

Table 3. Micronutrient and trace element composition of the red seaweeds G. turuturu, A. armata, and A. taxiformis according to Rodrigues et al. (2015), Roque et al. (2019), and Selmi et al. (2020) [70][76][77], and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element according to the European Food Safety Authority (ND–Non-determined; a) % DW; b) mg/day; c) mg/kg bw/week).

 

Element

Element Concentration (mg/g DW)

NVR (mg)

   

G. turuturu

A. armata

A. taxiformis

 

Micronutrients

K

20

ND

0.13784

2000

Mg

2

1.38 *

ND

375

Ca

2.65

4.47 a)

ND

800

Na

96.08

9.36 a)

0.200

600

P

2.81

0.27 a)

0.03593

700

Trace elements

Cu

0.01

ND

0.48

1

Zn

0.07

ND

ND

10

Fe

0.05

1.188

0.2189

14

Mn

0.02

0.0623

0.00305

2

B

0.02

0.0663

ND

10 b)

Al

0.01

0.0133

ND

1 c)

As

ND

ND

4 × 10−4

0.015 c)

Cd

ND

ND

2 × 10−5

0.007 c)

Hg

ND

ND

2 × 10−5

0.004 c)

Pb

ND

ND

5.1 × 10−4

0.005 c)

The red seaweed Asparagopsis armata Harvey 1855 (Figure 4), native from Australia, was intentionally introduced in Europe due to the high food demand in 1920 [78][79][80]. Then, this seaweed species was maintained by aquaculture in Ireland [79], which lead to their dispersion through this country.

Figure 4. Underwater photo of Asparagopsis armata in São Martinho do Porto (Portugal).

Some authors hypothesize that the introduction of exotic seaweed in the Iberian Peninsula was associated with oyster transportation and commercialization [81][82]. Since then, this seaweed species has been well established in the Northwest coast of the Iberian Peninsula [83].

There are records that this species has been used as food [84]. In fact, A. armata is rich in several micronutrients (Table 3) that are essential in lower concentrations to the good function of the human body, such as calcium (4.47% DW), sodium (9.36% DW), magnesium (1.38% DW), and phosphorus (0.27% DW). However, this seaweed is also rich in trace elements that are important in lower concentrations to human health, namely zinc (66.3 mg/kg), copper (13 mg/kg), manganese (62.3 mg/kg), and iron (1188 mg/kg) [70][77]. Moreover, A. armata contains a high protein content that can reach 18.3% DW, with the synthesis of essential amino acids, such as isoleucine, valine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, histidine, and tryptophan, which the human metabolism is not able to synthesize [85].

Besides that, the chemical composition of this seaweed presents several interesting bioactive compounds with applications in the food industry. In the Portuguese coast, researchers found that sterols represent 555 mg/kg A. armata dry weight namely, desmosterol, fucosterol, and b-sitosterol [86][87], which are anti-cholesterol compounds [87][88]. Moreover, this red alga also contains halogenated metabolites, such as bromine, chlorine, and iodine-containing methane, ethane, ethanol, acetaldehyde, acetone, 2-acetoxypropane, propene, epoxypropane, acrolein, and butenone [89][90][91][92], which are bioactive molecules with antifungal, antimicrobial and antibiotic effects [90][93][94].

Hence, the direct consumption of this seaweed, even in lower quantities, can be considered a supplement to the human daily diet. However, many studies have currently been focused on the incorporation of A. armata as an animal feed supplement in order to improve meat quality and reduce methane emissions [95].

Asparagopsis taxiformis (Delile) Trevisan 1845 (Figure 5) is a red seaweed native from Australia [96], with a high capability to cope with temperature variations [97], thus being distributed through tropic and sub-tropical regions [98]. This species is currently well established in Europe and is considered an invasive seaweed species in the Iberian Peninsula, particularly in Spain and in the Portuguese archipelagos (Azores and Madeira), due to their coverage area and noxious effects on the surrounding fauna and flora [74][98][99].

Figure 5. Underwater photo of Asparagopsis taxiformis in Terceira island (Azores archipelago -Portugal).

Among other seaweeds, there are historical records in Hawaii of A. taxiformis usage as a nutraceutical food due to their lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates (Table 2) content [100]. Further studies corroborated the ethnobotanical application of this seaweed in the Hawaiian daily diet, revealing the biochemical composition of this seaweed.

In the Portuguese islands, the biomass of this seaweed was also analyzed in order to evaluate its nutritional profile, revealing to be a good source of macronutrients [73]. For this reason, many recipes including A. taxiformis were developed, such as soups, salads, or scrambled eggs [101].

Asparagopsis taxiformis presents a rich composition in micronutrients and trace elements (Table 3). For instance, Selmi et al. (2020) [76] evaluated A. taxiformis nutritional profile of biomass harvested from Tunisia, which revealed a high content in iron (0.2189 mg/g), sodium (0.200 mg/g), and potassium (0.13784 mg/g), which are pivotal micronutrients to the good function of osmoregulatory processes in the human body. Meanwhile, the trace element with more representativity in A. taxiformis biomass was manganese, with a concentration of 3.05 × 10−3 mg/g. However, the other elements, namely, arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, and lead, demonstrated to be present in concentrations lower than 5 × 10−4mg/g.

This seaweed also presents nutraceutical potential as an iodine supplier, presenting a concentration up to 3.37 g/100g DW, benefiting people who suffer from a deficit of this micronutrient [102][103].

In summary, the invasive seaweeds from the Iberian Peninsula analyzed exhibit a rich nutritional composition in macro and micronutrients that are pivotal to complement a human health diet, even in low amounts (Table 3). However, it is necessary to consider that seaweed nutritional profiles vary according to the species, geographical place, tidal exposure, season, physico-chemical composition of the water, or even with the seaweed processing techniques [104]. Regarding the direct seaweed application in the food industry, consumers hold a concern relatively to metal concentration. Table 3 shows the nutrient value reference (NVR) according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [105]. Researchers analyzed A. taxiformis content in warning pollutants, namely As (4 × 10−4 mg/g DW), Cd (2 × 10−5 mg/g DW), Hg (2 × 10−5mg/g DW), and Pb (5.1 × 10−4 mg/g DW), revealing lower concentrations relative to the NVR for each element [106][107][108][109][110].

2.2. Brown Seaweeds

Colpomenia peregrina Sauvageau 1927 (Figure 6) is a brown seaweed native from the Northwest Pacific [111]. This species is characterized for being annual, with globular physiology and for being extremely tolerant to environmental conditions variation, such as salinity (15–30 PSU) and temperature (13–20°C) [112][113]. For this reason, C. peregrina is such a cosmopolitan species with ease in establishing in new areas. However, this exotic species can be easily misidentified with a native Portuguese seaweed, Colpomenia sinuosa. Thus, C. peregrina is characterized by the thinness of the thallus, hairs arising from the sub-cortical cells not associated with the sori, which are confluent, not punctate, and have no pellicle over the plurilocular sporangia, which are shorter than those of C. sinuosa [114].

Figure 6. Colpomenia peregrina in São Martinho do Porto (Portugal).

This exotic seaweed was firstly observed in Cadiz (Spain) in 1806 [115] and nowadays is present in the European temperate regions, including the Northwest of the Iberian Peninsula [116]. Researchers hypothesize that the introduction of this NIS could have occurred through the coastal cultivation of oysters in France. This seaweed grows attached to the oyster shells and when C. peregrina bladder fills up with air and water, is transported through the oceanic streams [116][117].

Despite the widespread distribution of C. peregrina, there are just a few studies regarding their nutritional profile and biomass valorization. Nevertheless, a group of researchers harvested this species in Southwest England in the United Kingdom (U.K) and determined that the composition of C. peregrina is mostly minerals, representing 85.3% of this seaweed dry weight, in which 12.2% DW are carbohydrates, 2.48% DW protein, and 0.8% DW lipids [118]. Further analysis was performed in order to evaluate their micronutrient profile (Table 4).

Table 4. Micronutrients and trace elements in the composition of Colpomenia peregrina in South West England (U.K) according to Beacham et al. (2019) [118] and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element according to the European Food Safety Authority (a) mg/day; b) mg/kg bw/week).

Biochemical profile

Element

Concentration (mg/ g)

NVR (mg)

Micronutrients

K

46.93

2000

P

0.67

700

Ca

55.64

800

Trace Elements

Cu

0.02

1

Zn

0.05

10

Sn

0.05

0.055

Mn

0.23

2

Si

252.29

20–50 a)

Al

19.61

1 b)

Fe

9.31

14

According to the available data, the high K and P content (46.93 and 0.67 mg/ g, respectively) indicates that this seaweed can be a potential biomass feedstock for the agriculture industry as a natural fertilizer. Regarding as a food source, C. peregrina is valuable due to its Ca content (55.64 mg/ g), which can be beneficial for people who suffer from diseases related to calcium deficit, such as osteoporosis [119].

Despite the high silicon content (252.29 mg/g) [118], it was estimated that a daily dietary intake of 20–50 mg silicon/day by an average adult with 60 kg is unlikely to cause health problems [120]. Nevertheless, it is necessary to consider that the aluminum concentration found in C. peregrina exceeds the tolerable upper intake recommended by EFSA.

Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt 1955 (Figure 7) is a native seaweed from Japan and China, being currently widespread along the European shoreline. Due to their high tolerance to hydrodynamic, temperature, and solar exposure variations, this species possess a huge ability to acclimatize and maintenance in different areas with distinct climate conditions [121][122]. Hence, their fast reproduction and growth rate makes them thrive after their introduction, assuming an invasive character [123][124].

Figure 7. Sargassum muticum in Buarcos Bay (Figueira da Foz, Portugal).

These Japanese-native seaweed species was inadvertently introduced into European Atlantic waters in the early 1970s. The first record of S. muticum in Europe was in the English Channel [125] and quickly spread to the Iberian Peninsula [126][127][128]. It is necessary to consider that the presence of this seaweed in marine ecosystems causes a serious macroalgal biodiversity loss due to the shading they produce, blocking the sunlight to other native species [129][130][131]. The authors theorize that the introduction of S. muticum in the Iberian Peninsula was probably due to oysters for aquaculture or through the spread of spores during transport of ballast water and its discharge [131].

Seaweeds chemical characterization mostly reflects the abiotic and biotic conditions where they grow, so according to the harvesting area, S. muticum biomass will present variations in the nutritional profile, namely in the macronutrients (Table 5), micronutrients, and trace elements (Table 6).

Table 5. Sargassum muticum nutritional characterization from biomass collected in different sampling sites. ND–Non-determined.

Harvesting Site

Lipids

Proteins

Carbohydrates

Ash

Moisture

Reference

U. K. (% DW)

1.6

4.64

69

26.4

ND

[118]

India (% FW)

0.12

5.31

39.25

16.90

87.91

[132]

Spain (% DW)

1.6–3.2

7–22

27.9–44.5

13.2–30.5

ND

[133]

Portugal (% DW)

1.45

16.9

49.3

22.94

9.64

[70]

In general, S. muticum nutritional profile from India, whereas the fresh biomass was analyzed, is notably lower than the macroalgal biomass collected in the other countries.

Comparatively, with the biomass collected in Spain, S. muticum harvested in the U.K. presented higher carbohydrates and ash content, which could possibly be related to the chemical composition presented in the marine ecosystem. In contrast, the lipid concentration of the biomass harvested in the U.K and Spain exhibited a similar value. For instance, S. muticum collected in Spain had a variation between 20.10% and 31.77% of total fatty acids content, whereas polyunsaturated fatty acids composition during the year presents a balanced ω-6/ω-3 ratio (1.40–3.37) [133], which is the recommended ratio for human food consumption by the World Health Organization (WHO) and as reviewed by Leandro et al., 2020 [61].

The overall biochemical analysis also shows that S. muticum contains a high concentration of carbohydrates, mostly alginic acid, which has a behavior of dietary fiber in the human gastric system.

However, it is also necessary to consider that the chemical composition of the macroalgal biomass varies within the biotic and abiotic parameters fluctuation in each sampling site [43]. Besides that, the drying process (time and temperature) can interfere with the nutritional yield and further valorization [133].

Table 6. Micronutrients and trace elements composition of Sargassum muticum harvested in the U.K. [118], India [132], and Spain [133] and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element, according to the European Food Safety Authority. ND–Non-dentermined; a) mg/kg bw/week.

 

 

Country

NVR (mg)

Biochemical profile

Element (mg/g)

U.K

India

Spain

 

Micronutrients

K

75.76

13

26.25

2000

P

1.34

0.4528

ND

700

Ca

11.2

15.256

47.15

800

Na

ND

ND

13.75

600

Trace Elements

Fe

0.08

0.537

0.9

14

Sn

0.06

ND

ND

0.055

Mn

0.01

0.025

0.03

2

Al

0.28

ND

ND

1a)

Cu

ND

0.003

0.0155

1

Zn

0.01

0.128

0.02675

10

Cr

ND

0.005

ND

0.04

Mo

ND

0.001

ND

0.05

I

ND

ND

0.0077

0.15

Ars

ND

ND

0.0216

0.015 a)

The nutrient richness of this seaweed species is highlighted in Table 6. Even though seaweed species are well-known metal bioaccumulators, the metal content analyzed in the biomass harvested in Spain exhibits metal concentrations below the threshold defined by EFSA [105][108][120].

Regarding the differences observed within the countries analyzed, is necessary to consider that seaweeds' chemical composition can be affected by several factors, such as the nutrient’s availability, pollution nodes, and other environmental parameters related to the geographical zone where the biomass is harvested [134][135]. However, this can only be corroborated with previous physico-chemical characterization of the habitat.

Although S. muticum has been already exploited for aquaculture production in China [136] and it is a traditional food in Korea [137], there is no commercial use of this biomass for food consumption in Europe nor in rest of the non-native location [138].

S. muticum contribution as an value-added product has been reviewed by Milledge, Nielsen, and Bailey (2016), highlighting the application as food, feed, and biofertilizers to agriculture crops [139].

Silva et al. (2019) [140] analyzed the effects of aqueous extracts of S. muticum as seed germination enhancer and as plant biofertilizer in two commercial sub-variants of Lactuca sativa (Lettuce) [140]. However, the germination assay proved that a high seaweed extract concentration inhibits seed germination. Nevertheless, the concentration of 25% was the best concentration for seed germination. In the biofertilizer assay, the same extract concentration (25%) demonstrated to be the most effective treatment. The S. muticum extract treatment revealed also that the plants were able to assimilate a higher minerals content, mainly P, K, Ca, Mg from the soil. These results show that S. muticum treatment can have an efficient multirole effect in the agricultural crop.

Regarding the animal feed industry, S. muticum can also contribute as a feed supplement to the holothurian and abalone aquaculture cultivation [141].

Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar 1873 (Figure 8) is annual kelp, native from the Northeast Pacific, being present in the shoreline of different countries such as Japan, China, Korea, and Oriental Russia. This species can stand a wide range of environmental conditions, such as temperatures from 0-27 °C and salinities as low as 20 PSU [142]. For this reason, this species is nowadays well established in several locations, namely, in the Atlantic, Mediterranean Sea, Pacific Oceania, and Atlantic America coastline, from Argentina to the United States of America [143].

Figure 8. Undaria pinnatifida in Buarcos Bay (Portugal).

Undaria pinnatifida was first registered in European shoreline in France in 1971 [144]. A probable introduction vector of this Asiatic species into the Iberian Peninsula can be related to the transportation of Pacific oysters, in resemblance with other exotic seaweed species [145]. The two other possible vectors responsible for the introduction of U. pinnatifida are mainly considered to be by boats (mainly trans-Atlantic boats, with cargo boats being one of the best examples for the accidental introduction of NIS); however, accidental introduction by aquaculture is also very well documented, mainly in 18 and 19 centuries [146][147]. Their ecological impact on native fauna and flora is even more concerning than other exotic seaweed species, considering that this is an annual species [148][149].

However, the harvesting and exploitation of this seaweed for direct food consumption, mainly in the Asiatic countries, already control U. pinnatifida biomass and is a sustainable way to mitigate the ecological disturbances caused by their presence in the ecosystems [150].

In Spain, U. pinnatifida is collected and afterward is usually dried in order to be sold for direct consumption [151] or as an ingredient in pre-cooked meals [152]. So, this invasive species cannot be cultivated in non-native habitats but can be harvested from coastal areas and incorporated into the daily human diet, direct or indirectly. Due to the high exploitation of this edible seaweed worldwide, the information available regarding the food nutritional values is very extensive, unlike the other exotic seaweeds analyzed. It is shown how the macronutrients (Table 7), micronutrients, and trace elements (Table 8) concentration varies according to the harvesting site.

Table 7. Undaria pinnatifida nutritional macronutrient characterization from biomass collected in different sampling sites. ND–Not determined.

Harvesting Site

Lipids

Proteins

Carbohydrates

Fibers

Ash

Reference

 

Japan

(Commercial sample % DW)

3.13

14.21

45.08

ND.

37.58

[153]

Japan

(% DW)

3.2

15

35.3

2.7

30.8

[154]

Spain

(% DW)

1

16.8

37

14.9

28.3

[155]

New Zealand (% DW)

3.30

19.66

50.4

ND

26.58

[150]

According to the literature, U. pinnatifida nutritional profile does not suffer many fluctuations between geographical zones, presenting identical results regarding lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, fibers, and mineral content. However, the lipid and protein profile could be different or exhibit different concentrations of each compound [153][154]. Moreover, U. pinnatifida synthesizes essential amino acids such as histidine, isoleucine, lysine, valine, phenylalanine, and methionine, but in different concentrations according to the geographical region [153][155]. Furthermore, U. pinnatifida from both sites also demonstrated low variations in their macronutrient concentration.

Table 8. Undaria pinnatifida micronutrients and trace elements characterization comparatively to the native and invasive site according to the literature [153][155] and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element, according to the European Food Safety Authority. ND–Non-determined; a) µg/ kg bw/d.

   

Country

 

Biochemical profile

Element (mg/ 100g DW)

Japan

Spain

NVR (mg)

Micronutrients

K

5691

5679

2000

P

450

1070

700

Ca

950

693.2

800

Mg

405

630.2

375

Na

6494

3511

600

Trace Elements

Mn

0.332

0.69

2

Ni

0.265

ND

2.8 a)

Cu

0.185

0,19

1

Zn

0.944

3,86

10

Cr

0.072

ND

0.04

I

26

9.6

0.15

From another perspective, the micronutrient and trace metals concentration are directly affected according to the geographical harvesting zone (Table 8). According to Taboada et al. (2013) and Kolb et al. (2004) [153][155], U. pinnatifida revealed similar contents of potassium in both geographical areas (Japan and Spain). Comparatively, U. pinnatifida biomass harvested in the native zone presented a higher content on calcium and sodium, while the biomass harvested from the Northwest Iberian Peninsula contained higher concentrations of phosphorus and magnesium.

The biomass collected in the invasive place showed a higher concentration in all the presented trace elements, except for nickel and chromium, for which the authors did not present information regarding the concentration of these trace metals in U. pinnatifida from Spain.

Researchers performed the analysis of the iodine (I) content in commercial samples from Europe and from Japan, whereas the European samples revealed a higher I concentration [156]. Thus, the recommended daily intake dose will be different, according to the origin of the seaweed [61].

It is proven that food consumption behavior can modify the skeletal muscle mass and performance. Extracts from the brown seaweed U. pinnatifida were tested on mice as a potential candidate to develop a product to promote muscle mass and functioning [157]. These extracts enhanced the mitochondrial biogenesis, which consequently increased the oxidative muscle fiber in mice and stimulated the angiogenesis in skeletal muscles. Thus, enhanced the mice's exercise capacity and skeletal muscle mass. The observed effects were derived from the presence of fucoxanthin, hesperetin, and caffeic acid and other bioactive molecules detected in U. pinnatifida extracts.

Undaria pinnatifida fatty acids demonstrated antioxidant and antibacterial activity, which can be used in the food industry [158]. Moreover, several studies have been focused on the application of bioactive compounds extracted from this brown seaweed, such as pigments or polysaccharides as flavor enhancers and to improve the organoleptic properties of food products [135][159].

However, this seaweed can also contribute indirectly to the food industry through crop culture. In fact, this seaweed was already tested as a soil amendment in poor quality soils in tomato production. The results obtained benefited the soil properties and promoted a multirole action as a soil fertilizing agent and enriching the plant with phytohormones and vitamins [160].

References

  1. Smale, D.A.; Burrows, M.T.; Moore, P.; O’Connor, N.; Hawkins, S.J. Threats and knowledge gaps for ecosystem services provided by kelp forests: a northeast Atlantic perspective. Evol. 2013, 3, 4016–4038, doi:10.1002/ece3.774.
  2. de Groot, R.; Fisher, B.; Christie, M.; Aronson, J.; Braat, L.; Gowdy, J.; Haines-Young, R.; Maltby, E.; Neuville, A.; Polasky, S.; Portela, R.; et al. Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations; Kumar, P. Ed. Routledge: Landon, UK; 2010;
  3. Vieira, R.; Pinto, I.S.; Arenas, F. The role of nutrient enrichment in the invasion process in intertidal rock pools. Hydrobiologia 2017, 797, 183–198, doi:10.1007/s10750-017-3171-x.
  4. Haram, L.; Sotka, E.; Byers, J. Effects of novel, non-native detritus on decomposition and invertebrate community assemblage. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2020, 643, 49–61, doi:10.3354/meps13335.
  5. Scharin, H.; Ericsdotter, S.; Elliott, M.; Turner, R.K.; Niiranen, S.; Blenckner, T.; Hyytiäinen, K.; Ahlvik, L.; Ahtiainen, H.; Artell, J.; et al. Processes for the sustainable stewardship of marine environments. Econ. 2016, 128, 55–67, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.010.
  6. Forster, J.; Radulovich, R. Seaweed and food security. In Seaweed Sustainability; Tiwari, B.K., Troy, D.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 289–313 ISBN 9780124186972.
  7. Lyons, D.A.; Arvanitidis, C.; Blight, A.J.; Chatzinikolaou, E.; Guy-Haim, T.; Kotta, J.; Orav-Kotta, H.; Queirós, A.M.; Rilov, G.; Somerfield, P.J.; et al. Macroalgal blooms alter community structure and primary productivity in marine ecosystems. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 2712–2724, doi:10.1111/gcb.12644.
  8. Abreu, M.H.; Pereira, R.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Yarish, C. Ecophysiological studies of the non-indigenous species Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Rhodophyta) and its abundance patterns in Ria de Aveiro lagoon, Portugal. J. Phycol. 2011, 46, 453–464, doi:10.1080/09670262.2011.633174.
  9. William, S.L.; Smith, J.E. A Global Review of the Distribution, Taxonomy, and Impacts of Introduced Seaweeds. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38, 327–359.
  10. Simard, N. Pelletier-Rousseau, M. Clarke Murray, C. Mckindsey, C.W. Therriault, T.W. Lacoursière-rouseel, A. Bernier, R. Sephton, D. Drolet, D. Locke, A. Martin, J.L. Drake, D.A.R. Mckensie, C.H. National risk assessment of recreational boating as a vector for aquatic invasive species; Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat: Ottawa, ON, Canada 2017;
  11. Mineur, F.; Johnson, M.P.; Maggs, C.A. Macroalgal Introductions by Hull Fouling on Recreational Vessels: Seaweeds and Sailors. Manage. 2008, 42, 667–676, doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9185-4.
  12. Mineur, F.; Johnson, M.P.; Maggs, C.A.; Stegenga, H. Hull fouling on commercial ships as a vector of macroalgal introduction. Biol. 2007, 151, 1299–1307, doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0567-y.
  13. Flagella, M.M.; Verlaque, M.; Soria, A.; Buia, M.C. Macroalgal survival in ballast water tanks. Pollut. Bull. 2007, 54, 1395–1401, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.05.015.
  14. Hewitt, C.L.; Campbell, M.L.; Schaffelke, B. Introductions of seaweeds: accidental transfer pathways and mechanisms. Mar. 2007, 50, 50, doi:10.1515/BOT.2007.038.
  15. Vranken, S.; Bosch, S.; Peña, V.; Leliaert, F.; Mineur, F.; De Clerck, O. A risk assessment of aquarium trade introductions of seaweed in European waters. Invasions 2018, 20, 1171–1187, doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1618-7.
  16. van Kleunen, M.; Weber, E.; Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Lett. 2010, 13, 235–245, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x.
  17. Hu, Z.-M.; Juan, L.-B. Adaptation mechanisms and ecological consequences of seaweed invasions: a review case of agarophyte Gracilaria vermiculophylla. Invasions 2014, 16, 967–976, doi:10.1007/s10530-013-0558-0.
  18. Murphy, J.T.; Johnson, M.P.; Viard, F. A theoretical examination of environmental effects on the life cycle schedule and range limits of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida. Invasions 2017, 19, 691–702, doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1357-1.
  19. BOE Real Decreto 630/2013, de 2 de agosto, por el que se regula el Catálogo español de especies exóticas invasoras. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Español, Madrid, Spain,. 2013, 185, 1–21, doi:BOE-A-2013-8565.
  20. Peteiro, C. Macroalgas alóctonas en la demarcación marina Noratlántica de la costa española. Informe del Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), 2014.
  21. Bercibar, E. Identificação das espécies de macroalgas não indígenas da costa portuguesa. Projeto BioMar PT. 2016, 2–3.
  22. Gorostiaga, J.; Santolaria, A.; Secilla, A.; Casares, C.; Díez, I. Check-list of the Basque coast benthic algae (North of Spain). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 2004, 61, 155–180, doi:10.3989/ajbm.2004.v61.i2.42.
  23. Chainho, P.; Fernandes, A.; Amorim, A.; Ávila, S.P.; Canning-Clode, J.; Castro, J.J.; Costa, A.C.; Costa, J.L.; Cruz, T.; Gollasch, S.; et al. Non-indigenous species in Portuguese coastal areas, coastal lagoons, estuaries and islands. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2015, 167, 199–211, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2015.06.019.
  24. Berecibar, E. Long-term Changes in the Phytogeography of the Portuguese Continental Coast (Ph.D. thesis), University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal,
  25. Peña, V.; Bárbara, I.; Grall, J.; Maggs, C.A.; Hall-Spencer, J.M. The diversity of seaweeds on maerl in the NE Atlantic. Biodivers. 2014, 44, 533–551, doi:10.1007/s12526-014-0214-7.
  26. Hu, Z.M.; Fraser, C. Seaweed phylogeography: Adaptation and evolution of seaweeds under environmental change; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 9789401775342.
  27. Montes, M.; Rico, J.M.; García-Vazquez, E.; Pichs, Y.J.B. Molecular barcoding confirms the presence of exotic Asian seaweeds (Pachymeniopsis gargiuli and Grateloupia turuturu) in the Cantabrian Sea, Bay of Biscay. PeerJ 2017, 2017, doi:10.7717/peerj.3116.
  28. Valentine, J.P.; Magierowski, R.H.; Johnson, C.R. Mechanisms of invasion: establishment, spread and persistence of introduced seaweed populations. Mar. 2007, 50, 50, doi:10.1515/BOT.2007.040.
  29. Blanco, A.; Lemos, M.F.L.; Pereira, L.; Gaspar, R. Mapping Invasive Macroalgae in the Western Iberian Peninsula: A Methodological Guide, Servizo de publicacións da Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain; 2020; ISBN 9788481588408.
  30. Cornish, M.L.; Monagail, M. M.; Critchley, A.T. The Animal Kingdom, Agriculture. and Seaweeds. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 574, doi:10.3390/jmse8080574.
  31. Vergés, A.; Sánchez, N.; Peteiro, C.; Polo, L.; Brodie, J.; Vergé, A.S.; Sar Peteiro, C.; Polo, I.; A, V.S. Pyropia suborbiculata (Bangiales, Rhodophyta): first records from the northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean of this North Pacific species. Phycologia 2013, 52, 121–129, doi:10.2216/12-003.1.
  32. Sánchez, N.; Vergés, A.; Peteiro, C.; Sutherland, J.E.; Brodie, J. Diversity of bladed Bangiales (Rhodophyta) in Western Mediterranean: Recognition of the genus Themis and descriptions of T. ballesterosii nov., T. iberica sp. nov., and Pyropia parva sp. nov. J. Phycol. 2014, 50, 908–929, doi:10.1111/jpy.12223.
  33. Monotilla, W.D.; Notoya, M. Morphological and physiological responses of Porphyra suborbiculata Kjellman (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) blades from five localities. Mar. 2004, 47, doi:10.1515/BOT.2004.038.
  34. Kornmann, P. Porphyra yezoensis bei Helgoland - eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 1986, 40, 327–342, doi:10.1007/BF01983740.
  35. Milstein, D.; Cabral De Oliveira, M. Molecular phylogeny of Bangiales (Rhodophyta) based on small subunit rDNA sequencing: Emphasis on Brazilian Porphyra Phycologia 2005, 44, 212–221, doi:10.2216/0031-8884(2005)44[212:MPOBRB]2.0.CO;2.
  36. Broom, J.E.; Nelson, W.A.; Yarish, C.; Jones, W.A.; Aguilar Rosas, R.; Aguilar Rosas, L.E. A reassessment of the taxonomic status of Porphyra suborbiculata, Porphyra carolinensis and Porphyra lilliputiana (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) based on molecular and morphological data. J. Phycol. 2002, 37, S0967026202003566, doi:10.1017/S0967026202003566.
  37. USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Agricultural Analytics Division Marine Plants & Algae Organic Production and Handling; USDA National Organic Program, 2016;
  38. Erhart, S.; Cerier, L. Sea vegetable celebration; Book Publishing Company: Summertown TN, 2001;
  39. US FDA. CFR–Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  40. Koh, Y.H.; Kim, M.S. Genetic diversity and distribution pattern of economic seaweeds Pyropia yezoensis and suborbiculata (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in the northwest Pacific. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 2495–2504, doi:10.1007/s10811-019-01984-6.
  41. Kang, J.W. Species of cultivated Porphyra in Korea. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1970, 3, 77–92.
  42. Noda, H. Health benefits and nutritional properties of nori. Appl. Phycol. 1993, 5, 255–258, doi:10.1007/BF00004027.
  43. Kaehler, S.; Kennish, R. Summer and winter comparisons in the nutritional value of marine macroalgae from Hong Kong. Mar. 1996, 39, 11–17, doi:10.1515/botm.1996.39.1-6.11.
  44. Hwang, E.K.; Park, C.S. Seaweed cultivation and utilization of Korea; Algae 2020, 35, 107–121.
  45. Schwelm, A.; Badstöber, J.; Bulman, S.; Desoignies, N.; Etemadi, M.; Falloon, R.E.; Gachon, C.M.M.; Legreve, A.; Lukeš, J.; Merz, U.; et al. Not in your usual Top 10: protists that infect plants and algae. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 1029–1044, doi:10.1111/mpp.12580.
  46. Hwang, E.K.; Park, C.S.; Kakinuma, M. Physicochemical responses of Pythium porphyrae (Oomycota), the causative organism of red rot disease in Porphyra to acidification. Res. 2009, 40, 1777–1784, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02284.x.
  47. Badis, Y.; Han, J.W.; Klochkova, T.A.; Gachon, C.M.M.; Kim, G.H. The gene repertoire of Pythium porphyrae (Oomycota) suggests an adapted plant pathogen tackling red algae. ALGAE 2020, 35, 133–144, doi:10.4490/algae.2020.35.6.4.
  48. Rodríguez, J.P.; Terrados, J.; Rosenfeld, S.; Méndez, F.; Ojeda, J.; Mansilla, A. Correction to: Effects of temperature and salinity on the reproductive phases of Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh (Phaeophyceae) in the Magellan region. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 929–929, doi:10.1007/s10811-019-01771-3.
  49. Byrne, K.; Zuccarello, G.C.; West, J.; Liao, M.-L.; Kraft, G.T. Gracilaria species (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) from southeastern Australia, including a new species, Gracilaria perplexa nov.: Morphology, molecular relationships and agar content. Phycol. Res. 2002, 50, 295–311, doi:10.1046/j.1440-1835.2002.00282.x.
  50. Rueness, J. Life history and molecular sequences of Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta), a new introduction to European waters. Phycologia 2005, 44, 120–128, doi:10.2216/0031-8884(2005)44[120:LHAMSO]2.0.CO;2.
  51. Gurgel, C.F.D.; Norris, J.N.; Schmidt, W.E.; Le, H.N.; Fredericq, S. Systematics of the gracilariales (Rhodophyta) including new subfamilies, tribes, subgenera, and two new genera, Agarophyton nov. and Crassa gen. nov. Phytotaxa 2018, 374, 1–23, doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.374.1.1.
  52. Wallentinus, I.; Nyberg, C.D. Introduced marine organisms as habitat modifiers. Pollut. Bull. 2007, 55, 323–332, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.11.010.
  53. Nyberg, C.D.; Thomsen, M.S.; Wallentinus, I. Flora and fauna associated with the introduced red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla. J. Phycol. 2009, 44, 395–403, doi:10.1080/09670260802592808.
  54. Santos, S.A.O.; Vilela, C.; Freire, C.S.R.; Abreu, M.H.; Rocha, S.M.; Silvestre, A.J.D. Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta macroalgae: A source of health promoting phytochemicals. Food Chem. 2015, 183, 122–128, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.006.
  55. Bermejo, R.; MacMonagail, M.; Heesch, S.; Mendes, A.; Edwards, M.; Fenton, O.; Knöller, K.; Daly, E.; Morrison, L. The arrival of a red invasive seaweed to a nutrient over-enriched estuary increases the spatial extent of macroalgal blooms. Environ. Res. 2020, 158, 104944, doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104944.
  56. Valente, L.M.P.; Rema, P.; Ferraro, V.; Pintado, M.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Cunha, L.M.; Oliveira, M.B.; Araújo, M. Iodine enrichment of rainbow trout flesh by dietary supplementation with the red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla. Aquaculture 2015, 446, 132–139, doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.05.004.
  57. Kumar, S.; Gupta, R.; Kumar, G.; Sahoo, D.; Kuhad, R.C. Bioethanol production from Gracilaria verrucosa, a red alga, in a biorefinery approach. Technol. 2013, 135, 150–156, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.120.
  58. Sousa, A.M.M.; Sereno, A.M.; Hilliou, L.; Gonçalves, M.P. Biodegradable agar extracted from Gracilaria vermiculophylla: Film properties and application to edible coating. In Proceedings of the Materials Science Forum; Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2010; Vol. 636–637, pp. 739–744.
  59. Phan, T.D.; Debeaufort, F.; Luu, D.; Voilley, A. Functional Properties of Edible Agar-Based and Starch-Based Films for Food Quality Preservation. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 973–981, doi:10.1021/jf040309s.
  60. Baek, S.K.; Song, K. Bin Development of Gracilaria vermiculophylla extract films containing zinc oxide nanoparticles and their application in smoked salmon packaging. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 269–275, doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.064.
  61. Leandro, A.; Pacheco, D.; Cotas, J.; Marques, J.C.; Pereira, L.; Gonçalves, A.M.M.M. Seaweed’s Bioactive Candidate Compounds to Food Industry and Global Food Security. Life 2020, 10, 140, doi:10.3390/life10080140.
  62. Simon, C.; Ar Gall, E.; Deslades, E. Expansion of the red alga Grateloupia doryphora along the coasts of Brittany (France). Hydrobiologia 2001, 443, 23–29, doi:10.1023/A:1017587918604.
  63. Gavio, B.; Fredericq, S. Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) is the correct name of the non-native species in the Atlantic known as Grateloupia doryphora. J. Phycol. 2002, 37, 349–359, doi:10.1017/S0967026202003839.
  64. Pérez-cirera, J.L.; Cremades, J.; Bárbara, I. Grateloupia lanceola (Cryptonem¡ales, Rhodophyta) en las costas de la Península Ibérica: Estudio morfológico y anatómico. Biologia (Bratisl). 1989, 134, 123–134.
  65. Levring, T.; Hoppe H. A.; Schmid O. J. Marinae Algae, A Survey of Research and Utilization. Fette, Seifen, Anstrichm. 1969, 71, 1020–1020, doi:10.1002/lipi.19690711206.
  66. Fujiwara-Arasaki, T.; Mino, N.; Kuroda, M. The protein value in human nutrition of edible marine algae in Japan. In Eleventh International Seaweed Symposium; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1984; pp. 513–516.
  67. Denis, C.; Morançais, M.; Li, M.; Deniaud, E.; Gaudin, P.; Wielgosz-Collin, G.; Barnathan, G.; Jaouen, P.; Fleurence, J. Study of the chemical composition of edible red macroalgae Grateloupia turuturu from Brittany (France). Food Chem. 2010, 119, 913–917, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.047.
  68. Kendel, M.; Couzinet-Mossion, A.; Viau, M.; Fleurence, J.; Barnathan, G.; Wielgosz-Collin, G. Seasonal composition of lipids, fatty acids, and sterols in the edible red alga Grateloupia turuturu. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 425–432, doi:10.1007/s10811-012-9876-3.
  69. Munier, M.; Dumay, J.; Morançais, M.; Jaouen, P.; Fleurence, J. Variation in the biochemical composition of the edible seaweed Grateloupia turuturu Yamada harvested from two sampling sites on the brittany coast (France): The influence of storage method on the extraction of the seaweed pigment r-phycoerythrin. Chem. 2013, 2013, 1–8, doi:10.1155/2013/568548.
  70. Rodrigues, D.; Freitas, A.C.; Pereira, L.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; Roriz, M.; Rodríguez-Alcalá, L.M.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Duarte, A.C. Chemical composition of red, brown and green macroalgae from Buarcos bay in Central West Coast of Portugal. Food Chem. 2015, 183, 197–207, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.057.
  71. Pereira, L. A review of the nutrient composition of selected edible seaweeds. In Seaweed: Ecology, Nutrient Composition and Medicinal Uses; Pomin, V.H., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 15–47 ISBN 978-1-61470-878-0.
  72. Pang, S.J.; Xiao, T.; Shan, T.F.; Wang, Z.F.; Gao, S.Q. Evidences of the intertidal red alga Grateloupia turuturu in turning Vibrio parahaemolyticus into non-culturable state in the presence of light. Aquaculture 2006, 260, 369–374, doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.07.008.
  73. McDermid, K.J.; Stuercke, B. Nutritional composition of edible Hawaiian seaweeds. Appl. Phycol. 2003, 15, 513–524, doi:10.1023/B:JAPH.0000004345.31686.7f.
  74. Nunes, N.; Ferraz, S.; Valente, S.; Barreto, M.C.; Pinheiro de Carvalho, M.A.A. Biochemical composition, nutritional value, and antioxidant properties of seven seaweed species from the Madeira Archipelago. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 2427–2437, doi:10.1007/s10811-017-1074-x.
  75. El-Baroty, G.S.; Moussa, M.Y.; Shallan, M.; Ali, M.; Sabh, Z.; Shalaby, E. Department Contribution to the Aroma, Biological Activities, Minerals, Protein, Pigments and Lipid Contents of the Red Alga: Asparagopsis taxiformis (Delile) Trevisan. Appl. Sci. Res. 2007, 3, 1825–1834.
  76. Selmi, A.; Khiari, R.; Snoussi, A.; Bouzouita, N. Analysis of Minerals and Heavy Metals Using ICP-OES and FTIR Techniques in Two Red Seaweeds (Gymnogongrus griffithsiae and Asparagopsis taxiformis) from Tunisia. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, doi:10.1007/s12011-020-02335-0.
  77. Roque, B.M.; Salwen, J.K.; Kinley, R.; Kebreab, E. Inclusion of Asparagopsis armata in lactating dairy cows’ diet reduces enteric methane emission by over 50 percent. Clean. Prod. 2019, 234, 132–138, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.193.
  78. Horridge, G.A. Occurrence of aAsparagopsis armata on the scilly Isles. Nature 1951, 167, 732–733, doi:10.1038/167732c0.
  79. Kraan, S.; Barrington, K.A. Commercial farming of Asparagopsis armata (Bonnemaisoniceae, Rhodophyta) in Ireland, maintenance of an introduced species? Appl. Phycol. 2005, 17, 103–110, doi:10.1007/s10811-005-2799-5.
  80. Monagail, M. M.; Morrison, L. The seaweed resources of Ireland: a twenty-first century perspective. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 1–14, doi:10.1007/s10811-020-02067-7.
  81. Vaz-Pinto, F.; Olabarria, C.; Arenas, F. Propagule pressure and functional diversity: Interactive effects on a macroalgal invasion process. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012, 471, 51–60, doi:10.3354/meps10024.
  82. Trowbridge, C.D. A global proliferation of non-native marine and brackish macroalgae.In: World Seaweed Resources—An Authoritative Reference System, Critchley, A.T, Ohno, M, Largo, D.B Eds. ETI Bioinformatics, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2006.
  83. Blanco, A.; Neto, J.M.; Troncoso, J.; Lemos, M.F.L.; Olabarria, C. Effectiveness of two western Iberian Peninsula marine protected areas in reducing the risk of macroalgae invasion. Indic. 2020, 108, 105705, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105705.
  84. Zahmatkesh, F.; Gaspar, R.; Pereira, L. Marine Invasive Seaweeds of the Iberian Peninsula for Value Added Products. In Encyclopedia of Marine Biotechnology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ; USA, 2020; p. 3248 ISBN 0263034612001.
  85. Pellegrini, M.; Pharo, P.; Sciences, F. Contribution ä etude chimique des Algues Mediterraneennes. Mar. 1967, 12, 9–14.
  86. Lopes, G.; Sousa, C.; Bernardo, J.; Andrade, P.B.; Valentão, P.; Ferreres, F.; Mouga, T. Sterol profiles in 18 macroalgae of the portuguese coast. Phycol. 2011, 47, 1210–1218, doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.01028.x.
  87. El Hattab, N.; Daghbouche, Y.; El Hattab, M.; Piovetti, L.; Garrigues, S.; De La Guardia, M. FTIR-determination of sterols from the red alga Asparagopsis armata: Comparative studies with HPLC. Talanta 2006, 68, 1230–1235, doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2005.07.023.
  88. Brufau, G.; Canela, M.A.; Rafecas, M. Phytosterols: physiologic and metabolic aspects related to cholesterol-lowering properties. Res. 2008, 28, 217–225, doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2008.02.003.
  89. Woolard, F.X.; Moore, R.E.; Roller, P.P. Halogenated acetic and acrylic acids from the red alga Asparagopsis taxiformis. Phytochemistry 1979, 18, 617–620, doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84271-5.
  90. McConnell, O.; Fenical, W. Halogen chemistry of the red alga Asparagopsis. Phytochemistry 1977, 16, 367–374, doi:10.1016/0031-9422(77)80067-8.
  91. Burreson, B.J.; Moore, R.E.; Roller, P.P. Volatile Halogen Compounds in the Alga Asparagopsis taxiformis (Rhodophyta). Agric. Food Chem. 1976, 24, 856–861, doi:10.1021/jf60206a040.
  92. Paul, N.A.; De Nys, R.; Steinberg, P.D. Chemical defence against bacteria in the red alga Asparagopsis armata: Linking structure with function. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 306, 87–101, doi:10.3354/meps306087.
  93. Genovese, G.; Tedone, L.; Hamann, M.T.; Morabito, M. The Mediterranean red alga Asparagopsis: A source of compounds against Leishmania. Drugs 2009, 7, 361–366, doi:10.3390/md7030361.
  94. Salvador, N.; Gómez Garreta, A.; Lavelli, L.; Ribera, M.A. Antimicrobial activity of Iberian macroalgae. Mar. 2007, 71, 101–113, doi:10.3989/scimar.2007.71n1101.
  95. Kinley, R.D.; Martinez-Fernandez, G.; Matthews, M.K.; de Nys, R.; Magnusson, M.; Tomkins, N.W. Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120836, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120836.
  96. Andreakis, N.; Costello, P.; Zanolla, M.; Saunders, G.W.; Mata, L. Endemic or introduced? Phylogeography of Asparagopsis (Florideophyceae) in Australia reveals multiple introductions and a new mitochondrial lineage. Phycol. 2016, 52, 141–147, doi:10.1111/jpy.12373.
  97. Martins, G.M.; Cacabelos, E.; Faria, J.; Álvaro, N.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Neto, A.I. Patterns of distribution of the invasive alga Asparagopsis armata Harvey: A multi-scaled approach. Invasions 2019, 14, 582–593, doi:10.3391/ai.2019.14.4.02.
  98. Ní Chualáin, F.; Maggs, C.A.; Saunders, G.W.; Guiry, M.D. The invasive genus Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniaceae, Rhodophyta): Molecular systematics, morphology, and ecophysiology of Falkenbergia J. Phycol. 2004, 40, 1112–1126, doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03135.x.
  99. Cacabelos, E.; Martins, G.M.; Faria, J.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Costa, T.; Moreu, I.; Neto, A.I. Limited effects of marine protected areas on the distribution of invasive species, despite positive effects on diversity in shallow-water marine communities. Invasions 2020, 22, 1169–1179, doi:10.1007/s10530-019-02171-x.
  100. Abbott, I.A. An Ethnobotanical Study of Some Hawaiian Seaweeds; National Tropical Botanical Garden: Kauai, HI, USA, 1996;
  101. Unidade de Bioquímica, M. Seaweed Recipes Available online: http://www.ubqmadeira.com/category/receitas/ (accessed on 3 September 2020).
  102. Nunes, N.; Valente, S.; Ferraz, S.; Barreto, M.C.; Pinheiro de Carvalho, M.A.A. Nutraceutical potential of Asparagopsis taxiformis (Delile) Trevisan extracts and assessment of a downstream purification strategy. Heliyon 2018, 4, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00957.
  103. Ferraz, S. Different Seaweeds Use for Iodine Deficiency Overcome. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2019, 15, 13–16, doi:10.26717/bjstr.2019.15.002710.
  104. Rupérez, P. Mineral content of edible marine seaweeds. Food Chem. 2002, 79, 23–26, doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00171-1.
  105. EFSA Overview on Tolerable Upper Intake Levels as derived by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) and the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Food Saf. Auth. 2018, 3, 4.
  106. EFSA Scientific Opinion on Lead in Food. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1–151, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1570.
  107. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Cockburn, A.; Cravedi, J.; Dogliotti, E.; Domenico, A. Di; Fernández-cruz, M.L.; Fink-gremmels, J.; Fürst, P.; Galli, C.; et al. Cadmium in food, scientific opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the food chain. EFSA J. 2009, 1019, 1–76.
  108. EFSA Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in Food. EFSA J. 2009, 7, 1351, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1351.
  109. Panel, E.; Chain, F. Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA J. 2012, 10, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2985.
  110. Aguilar, F.; Autrup, H.; Barlow, S.; Castle, L.; Crebelli, R.; Dekant, W.; Gontard, N.; Gott, D.; Grilli, S.; Leclercq, C.; et al. Safety of aluminium from dietary intake - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Food Contact Materials (AFC). EFSA J. 2008, 6, 1–34, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2008.754.
  111. Abbott, I.A.; Isabella, A.; Hollenberg, G.J. Marine Algae of California; Stanford University Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1992;
  112. Lee, K.M.; Boo, G.H.; Coyer, J.A.; Nelson, W.A.; Miller, K.A.; Boo, S.M. Distribution patterns and introduction pathways of the cosmopolitan brown alga Colpomenia peregrina using mt cox3 and atp6 sequences. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 491–504, doi:10.1007/s10811-013-0052-1.
  113. Pereira, L. Seaweed flora of the European North Atlantic and Mediterranean. In Handbook of Marine Biotechnology; Kim, S.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg.,Germany, 2015; pp. 65–178.
  114. Fatemeh, Z. Sampling, mapping and adding value to marine invasive seaweeds of the Iberian Peninsula, MSC Thesis, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2017.
  115. Blackler, H. The occurrence of Colpomenia peregrina (Sauv.) Hamel in the Mediterranean (Phaeophyta, Scytosiphonales). Blumea 1967, 15, 5–8.
  116. Green, L.A.; Mathieson, A.C.; Neefus, C.D.; Traggis, H.M.; Dawes, C., J. Southern expansion of the brown alga Colpomenia peregrina Sauvageau (Scytosiphonales) in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar. 2012, 55, 643–647.
  117. Minchin, A. Further distributional records of the adventive marine brown alga Colpomenia peregrina (Phaeophyta) in Ireland. Irish Nat. J. 1991, 23, 380–381.
  118. Beacham, T.A.; Cole, I.S.; DeDross, L.S.; Raikova, S.; Chuck, C.J.; Macdonald, J.; Herrera, L.; Ali, T.; Airs, R.L.; Landels, A.; et al. Analysis of seaweeds from South West England as a biorefinery feedstock. Sci. 2019, 9, doi:10.3390/app9204456.
  119. Allen, L., de Benoist, B., Dary, O., Hurrel, R. Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrientes; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006;
  120. Zhou, J.; Chen, X. Tolerable upper intake level on vitamins and minerals; J. of hygiene research 2004,33, 771-773.
  121. Tanniou, A.; Vandanjon, L.; Gonçalves, O.; Kervarec, N.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V. Rapid geographical differentiation of the European spread brown macroalga Sargassum muticum using HRMAS NMR and Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy. Talanta 2015, 132, 451–456, doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.09.002.
  122. Kraan, S. Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt in Ireland: An invasive species on the move. Appl. Phycol. 2008, 20, 825–832, doi:10.1007/s10811-007-9208-1.
  123. Álvarez-Canali, D.; Sangil, C.; Sansón, M. Fertile drifting individuals of the invasive alien Sargassum muticum (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) reach the coasts of the Canary Islands (eastern Atlantic Ocean). Bot. 2020, 103322, doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2020.103322.
  124. Harries, D.; Cook, E.; Donnan, D.; Mair, J.; Harrow, S.; Wilson, J. The establishment of the invasive alga Sargassum muticum on the west coast of Scotland: Rapid northwards spread and identification of potential new areas for colonisation. Invasions 2007, 2, 367–377, doi:10.3391/ai.2007.2.4.5.
  125. Farnham, W. F., Fletcher, R. L., Irvine, L.M. Attached Sargassum found in Britain. Nature 1973, 243, 2.
  126. Critchley, A. T., Farnham, W. F., Morrell, S.L. A chronology of new European sites of attachment for the invasive brownalga, Sargassum muticum, 1973–1981. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1983, 63, 799–811.
  127. Rueness, J. Sargassum muticum and other introduced Japanese macroalgae: biological pollution of European coasts. Pollut. Bull. 1989, 20, 173–176.
  128. Fernández, C. Ecology of Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) on the north coast of Spain: IV. Sequence of colonization on ashore. Mar. 1999, 42, 553–562.
  129. Anadón, R., Fernández, C. Comparación de tres comunidades de horizontes intermareales con abundancia de Gelidium latifolium (Grev.) Born et Thur. en la costa de Asturias (N. de España). Pesq. 1986, 50, 353–366.
  130. Sanchez, I.; Fernandez, C.; Arrontes, J. Long-term changes in the structure of intertidal assemblages after invasion by Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta). Phycol. 2005, 41, 942–949, doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00122.x.
  131. Critchley, A.T., Farnham, W.F., Yoshida, T., Norton, T.A. A bibliography of the invasive alga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt (Fucales; Sargassaceae). Mar. 1990, 33, 551–562.
  132. Fouda, W.A.; Ibrahim, W.M.; Ellamie, A.M.; Ramadan, G. Biochemical and mineral compositions of six brown seaweeds collected from red sea at hurghada coast. Indian J. Geo-Marine Sci. 2019, 48, 484–491.
  133. Balboa, E.M.; Gallego-Fábrega, C.; Moure, A.; Domínguez, H. Study of the seasonal variation on proximate composition of oven-dried Sargassum muticum biomass collected in Vigo Ria, Spain. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 1943–1953, doi:10.1007/s10811-015-0727-x.
  134. Kumar, M.S.; Sharma, S.A. Toxicological effects of marine seaweeds: a cautious insight for human consumption. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 1–22, doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1738334.
  135. Peñalver, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Ros, G.; Amarowicz, R.; Pateiro, M.; Nieto, G. Seaweeds as a Functional Ingredient for a Healthy Diet. Drugs 2020, 18, 301, doi:10.3390/md18060301.
  136. Liu, F.; Pang, S.; Gao, S.; Shan, T. Intraspecific genetic analysis, gamete release performance, and growth of Sargassum muticum (Fucales, Phaeophyta) from China. Chinese J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2013, 31, 1268–1275, doi:10.1007/s00343-013-2314-9.
  137. Yang, E.-J.; Ham, Y.M.; Lee, W.J.; Lee, N.H.; Hyun, C.-G. Anti-inflammatory effects of apo-9′-fucoxanthinone from the brown alga, Sargassum muticum. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 21, 62, doi:10.1186/2008-2231-21-62.
  138. Lodeiro, P.; Cordero, B.; Grille, Z.; Herrero, R.; Sastre de Vicente, M.E. Physicochemical studies of Cadmium(II) biosorption by the invasive alga in Europe, Sargassum muticum. Bioeng. 2004, 88, 237–247, doi:10.1002/bit.20229.
  139. Milledge, J.J.; Nielsen, B. V.; Bailey, D. High-value products from macroalgae: the potential uses of the invasive brown seaweed, Sargassum muticum. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 15, doi:10.1007/s11157-015-9381-7.
  140. Silva, L.D.; Bahcevandziev, K.; Pereira, L. Production of bio-fertilizer from Ascophyllum nodosum and Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyceae). Oceanol. Limnol. 2019, 37, 918–927, doi:10.1007/s00343-019-8109-x.
  141. Zhao, F.; Liu, F.; Liu, J.; Ang, P.O.; Duan, D. Genetic structure analysis of natural Sargassum muticum (Fucales, Phaeophyta) populations using RAPD and ISSR markers. Appl. Phycol. 2008, 20, 191–198, doi:10.1007/s10811-007-9207-2.
  142. Hay, C.H. The dispersal of sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida by coastal shipping in New Zealand, and implications for further dispersal of Undaria in France. Phycol. J. 1990, 25, 301–313, doi:10.1080/00071619000650331.
  143. Aguilar-Rosas, R.; Aguilar-Rosas, L.E.; Ávila-Serrano, G.; Marcos-Ramírez, R. First record of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (Laminariales, Phaeophyta) on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Mar. 2004, 47, doi:10.1515/BOT.2004.028.
  144. Boudouresque, C.F.; Verlaque, M. Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 44, 32–38, doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00150-3.
  145. Floc’h, J.Y.; Pajot, R.; Wallentinus, I. The Japanese brown alga Undaria pinnatifida on the coast of France and its possible establishment in European waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1991, 47, 379–390, doi:10.1093/icesjms/47.3.379.
  146. Silva, P. C., Woodfield, R. A., Cohen, A. N., Harris, L. H., Goddard, J.H.R. First Report of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida in the Northeastern Pacific Ocean. Invasions 2002, 333–338, doi:10.1023/A.
  147. Thornber, C.; Kinlan, B.; Graham, M.; Stachowicz, J. Population ecology of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida in California: environmental and biological controls on demography. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 268, 69–80, doi:10.3354/meps268069.
  148. Zabin, C.; Ashton, G.; Brown, C.; Ruiz, G. Northern range expansion of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) in western North America. Invasions 2009, 4, 429–434, doi:10.3391/ai.2009.4.3.1.
  149. Curiel, D.; Bellemo, G.; Marzocchi, M.; Scattolin, M.; Parisi, G. Distribution of introduced Japanese macroalgae Undaria pinnatifida, Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) and Antithamnion Pectinatum (Rhodophyta) in the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia 1998, 385, 17–22, doi:10.1023/A:1003437105147.
  150. Smith, J.; Summers, G.; Wong, R. Nutrient and heavy metal content of edible seaweeds in New Zealand. New Zeal. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2010, 38, 19–28, doi:10.1080/01140671003619290.
  151. Alga Desidratada Wakame - Poorto Muiños Available online: https://www.elcorteingles.pt/supermercado/0105218175200239-porto-muinos-alga-desidratada-wakame-embalagem-50-g/ (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  152. Algas, L. das Mexilhão ao natural em cama de Wakame - Porto Muiños Available online: https://www.lojadasalgas.pt/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=145&search=wakame (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  153. Kolb, N.; Vallorani, L.; Milanović, N.; Stocchi, V. Evaluation of Marine Algae Wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) and Kombu (Laminaria digitata japonica) as Food Supplements. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2004, 42, 57–61.
  154. Taira, H. Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, Fifth revised edition. Integrated Study Dietary Habits 2001, 48, 549–553.
  155. Taboada, M.C.; Millán, R.; Miguez, M.I. Nutritional value of the marine algae wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) and nori (Porphyra purpurea) as food supplements. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1271–1276, doi:10.1007/s10811-012-9951-9.
  156. González, A.; Paz, S.; Rubio, C.; Gutiérrez, Á.J.; Hardisson, A. Human Exposure to Iodine from the Consumption of Edible Seaweeds. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 197, 361–366, doi:10.1007/s12011-019-01996-w.
  157. Ahn, J., Ha, T. Y., Ahn, J., Jung, C. H., Seo, D. H., Kim, J. M., Kim, Y. S., Jang, Y. Undaria pinnatifida extract feeding increases exercise endurance and skeletal muscle mass by promoting oxidative muscle remodeling in mice. Faseb J. 2020, 34, 8068–8081.
  158. Patra, J.K.; Lee, S.; Park, J.A.E.G.Y.U.; Baek, K. Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of essential oil extracted from an edible seaweed Undaria pinnatifida. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12278, doi:10.1111/jfbc.12278.
  159. Yoshinaga, K.; Maruya, R.; Koikeda, T.; Nakano, T. Effects of Undaria pinnatifida (wakame) on the human intestinal environment. Foods Heal. Dis. 2018, 8, 488–504.
  160. Florencia, M.; Lorena, S.; Yamila, A.; Alejandra, M.; Fernando, D.; Alejandra, V.; Anahí, C. Amelioration of tomato plants cultivated in organic-matter impoverished soil by supplementation with Undaria pinnatifida. Algal Res. 2020, 46, 101785, doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101785.
More
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , ,
View Times: 2.2K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 25 Nov 2020
1000/1000