Search | Encyclopedia MDPI

Topic Review

Acute repetitive s (ARS) refer to two or more unprovoked seizures that occur within a 24hour period without recovery of consciousness between seizures. ARS is a medical emergency that requires prompt treatment to prevent further seizures and potential complications. The seizures usually occur very close together, within minutes or hours of each other.

255
16 Apr 2025

Biography

Anthony-Claret Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret Onwutalobi is a Nigerian-Finnish author, software engineer, political activist, and diaspora leader. He is widely recognized for his advocacy on African development, communication equity, and the promotion of Igbo cultural identity in the diaspora. He has served in multiple leadership roles in African diaspora communities across Europe and the United Kingdom and is the founder of

254
26 May 2025

Topic Review

Coordinating Pricing under BOPS: Money-Back Guarantees

Buy-Online-and-Pick-up-in-Store (BOPS) is an omnichannel retailing strategy that allows consumers to place orders online and collect products at physical stores, enhancing logistical efficiency and cross-channel integration. To address the challenge of high return rates in e-commerce, many retailers implement Money-Back Guarantee (MBG) policies, which reduce perceived purchase risk and strengthen consumer trust. However, in decentralized retail settings, such as when online and offline channels are operated by different parties, MBG policies can create profit asymmetries and coordination frictions. Recent research employs Stackelberg game models to examine how MBG and platform subsidies interactively influence pricing decisions, channel profitability, consumer surplus, and social welfare. These findings suggest that MBG and subsidies should be jointly designed to align incentives across channels and optimize system performance.

190
14 Jul 2025

Topic Review Peer Reviewed

Brand Activism: Gen Z and Socio-Political Branding

Branding refers to the distinctiveness of an organization that differentiates it from its competitors and builds loyalty with customers. Brand trust is the confidence consumers have in a company to deliver consistently against their expectations of the brand. Brand equity is the commercial value that a brand has and is linked to consumer perception and loyalty. Culture refers to the expected behaviors of a defined group of people, e.g., customers. Brand activism is when an organization takes a visible ideological stance associated with a specific issue or social concern. Socio-political branding refers to the practice of using brand activism specifically to connect with certain key stakeholder groups.

50
21 Jan 2026

Topic Review

Barriers to Entry and Market Control

Barriers to entry constitute one of the most significant structural determinants of market power and play a decisive role in shaping the competitive conditions of an industry. They refer to the financial, operational, legal, technological, and strategic constraints that restrict the ability of new firms to enter a market and compete effectively against established participants. Within Five-level of The Market Power Hierarchy Framework, barriers to entry are fundamental because they explain the mechanisms through which dominant firms preserve their position and sustain long-term influence over market structure and economic outcomes. These barriers may emerge as a natural consequence of industrial characteristics or may be deliberately reinforced through strategic action. Natural barriers commonly arise in industries that require substantial capital expenditure, specialized expertise, advanced technological systems, or large-scale infrastructure before commercial operations can be established. Sectors such as telecommunications, energy production, transportation networks, and large-scale manufacturing frequently exhibit these structural conditions, thereby limiting market participation to organizations possessing significant financial and technical capacity. Strategic barriers, by contrast, are intentionally strengthened by dominant firms through mechanisms such as exclusive contractual arrangements, vertical control over distribution systems, consumer lock-in structures, aggressive brand reinforcement, and the acquisition of emerging competitors capable of future market disruption. As barriers to entry intensify, market competition becomes progressively less dynamic. New entrants encounter increasingly complex challenges in establishing operational viability, while incumbent firms face fewer external threats to their market position. This reduction in competitive pressure grants established firms greater strategic autonomy, allowing them to influence pricing structures, supply conditions, production standards, and patterns of consumer access with reduced resistance. Over time, this process generates a self-reinforcing cycle of market control in which dominance becomes structurally embedded and increasingly resistant to competitive challenge. Barriers to entry rarely function as isolated constraints. In concentrated markets, multiple barriers typically operate simultaneously, creating layered systems of institutional protection for dominant firms. A single firm may benefit from economies of scale, accumulated consumer trust, privileged access to financial resources, technological superiority, regulatory familiarity, and entrenched distribution advantages at the same time. The interaction of these reinforcing conditions substantially reduces the probability that new entrants can establish effective competition, even where innovation or cost advantages are present. The long-term consequences of strong entry barriers extend beyond market stability for dominant firms. Although such barriers may produce short-term operational efficiency and predictability, they may also contribute to stagnation within the broader market environment. In the absence of meaningful competitive pressure, firms may exhibit reduced incentives to improve productive efficiency, lower costs, or pursue innovation at the pace typically observed in more competitive industries. Consequently, barriers to entry must be understood not merely as mechanisms of market protection, but as central structural forces that shape the distribution, persistence, and exercise of economic power over time.

34
11 May 2026

Topic Review

The Hierarchy of Market Power

The Market Power Hierarchy Framework is a structured analytical model that conceptualizes market power as a progressive continuum rather than a binary distinction between competition and monopoly. It organizes firms into five distinct levels based on their degree of market dominance, typically measured through market share, control over resources, and influence on market outcomes. By transforming a continuous spectrum into defined stages, the framework provides a clearer and more practical approach to understanding how power operates within economic systems. At its core, the framework is based on the principle that increases in market share do not lead to linear increases in power. Instead, as firms move up the hierarchy, their influence expands in scope and complexity. A firm with moderate dominance may still face competitive constraints, while a highly dominant firm can shape pricing structures, influence consumer behavior, and control access to the market itself. This shift reflects a transition from reactive competition to proactive market control. The hierarchy is divided into five levels: Free Market (below 40% market share), Oligarchic Market (40–60%), Moderate Monopoly (60–80%), Dominant Monopoly (80–90%), and Absolute Monopoly (100%). Each level corresponds to distinct patterns of firm behavior, competitive pressure, and economic outcomes. Lower levels are characterized by high competition, price sensitivity, and continuous innovation, while higher levels exhibit increased pricing power, stronger barriers to entry, and greater stability of market position. A key contribution of the framework is its integration of structural and behavioral analysis. It not only identifies where a firm stands within the market, but also explains how that position influences decision-making. As dominance increases, firms experience reduced competitive pressure, allowing them to shift focus from short-term survival to long-term strategic control. This includes the use of pricing strategies, investment in barriers to entry, and expansion into complementary markets. The framework also emphasizes the role of reinforcing mechanisms that sustain market power over time. These include economies of scale, brand loyalty, control of key resources, network effects, and access to capital. In modern digital markets, platform-based business models and data accumulation further accelerate the concentration of power, enabling firms to establish self-reinforcing dominance through user networks and ecosystem control. In addition to theoretical insight, the Market Power Hierarchy Framework has practical applications in policy analysis, business strategy, and market evaluation. It can be used to assess the competitive environment of an industry, predict firm behavior, and evaluate the potential impact of regulation. By identifying the level of dominance, policymakers can better determine when intervention is necessary to preserve competition and protect consumer welfare. Overall, the framework provides a comprehensive approach to understanding market dynamics in both traditional and modern economies. It highlights that market power is not a fixed condition, but an evolving process shaped by strategic behavior, structural advantages, and external conditions. As such, it offers a valuable tool for analyzing how firms gain, maintain, and exercise control within increasingly complex economic environments.

29
07 May 2026

Topic Review

Aligning People Strategy With Long-Term Growth

Aligning your people strategy with long-term business goals transforms the way your organization grows. Stronger teams, clearer accountability, and smoother scaling become possible when talent decisions support the company’s vision.

18
26 Feb 2026

Topic Review Peer Reviewed

Social Washing and Authentic Accountability

Social washing refers to the strategic exaggeration or misrepresentation of an organisation’s commitment to social responsibility, ethical governance, or social impact without corresponding substantive action. It typically operates through selective disclosure, symbolic initiatives, or performative communication that aligns the organisation with socially desirable values—such as equity, human rights, community development, or inclusion—while underlying practices remain unchanged, weakly evidenced, or contradictory. The concept belongs to the wider family of “washing” phenomena associated with corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) frameworks, especially the difficult-to-measure social (“S”) pillar. By contrast, authentic accountability refers to governance and reporting practices that connect institutional commitments to verifiable social outcomes and discernible improvements in human well-being. The institutionalisation of ESG frameworks has raised expectations of corporate responsibility while also enlarging the scope for reputational manipulation. Within this setting, social washing has become relevant not only to social policy and sustainable development debates, but also to corporate governance, ESG evaluation, and cross-sector partnership practice. This entry examines how organisations construct narratives of social responsibility that do not necessarily correspond to substantive social outcomes. It also argues that such distortions matter both for welfare systems and civil-society actors and for ESG assessment, reputational signalling, and the interpretation of social performance in market settings.

17
22 Apr 2026

Featured Reprints

Quick Survey