Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major public health concern which affects one-fourth of the general population worldwide [1]. In the United States, NAFLD affects 30% of the population [2] and is expected to reach 100 million people in the United States by the year 2030 [3]. NAFLD is characterized by lipid accumulation in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, which results from an imbalance in lipid acquisition, clearance, and export (i.e., fatty acid uptake, de novo lipogenesis and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, production of very low-density lipoproteins particles) [4]. NAFLD is predicted to become the second most common reason for liver transplantation in the United States [6,7].

Obesity, which has reached epidemic proportions worldwide, is associated with an increased risk of numerous metabolic abnormalities, such as NAFLD and T2DM [1,2,3]. Diabetes, T2DM in particular, is a major health burden because of its chronic nature, growing speed, medical cost, and its impact on adults and adolescents [4]. In the United States, diabetic prevalence is estimated to be totaled at approximately 70 million by the year 2050; furthermore, currently 422 million adults globally are living with diabetes and this number is expected to increase to 629 million according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [5] (www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report (accessed on 6 March 2022). In children and adolescents, the prevalence of both type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and T2DM has also increased [6]. Diabetes is associated with increased risk of chronic liver disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, infections, chronic kidney disease, cancer, diabetic neuropathy, and blindness [7]. The link between diabetes and liver damage, such as fatty liver, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, is well documented [8]. Low-grade inflammation plays a critical pathophysiological role in diabetes [9] and patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of developing infections as well as sepsis; this constitutes 20.1–22.7% of all sepsis patients [10].

Evolution is tightly linked to phenotypic variations of organisms by gene expression. A change in the functional product of each gene is altered primarily by transcription factors. Transcription factors can bind to the promoter or enhancer regions of specific genes through their DNA-binding domains [15]. As a result, transcription factors regulate gene transcription, protein synthesis, and cellular function. Glucose is one of the principal energy fuels for mammalian cells and takes a central position in metabolism. In some mammalian tissues and cells, such as neurons, erythrocytes, and renal medulla, glucose is the sole energy source. Low blood glucose levels (hypoglycemia) can cause serious damage to these tissues or cells [16,17]. On the other hand, high blood glucose levels (hyperglycemia) can cause serious adverse effects, which are clearly demonstrated in diabetic patients [18,19]. Therefore, maintenance of blood glucose levels within a narrow range (70~110 mg/dL) is critical for protection of organisms against hypoglycemia during fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia. The liver is one of the main organs that contributes to the regulation of blood glucose levels by releasing the glucose into circulation when blood glucose levels are low and stores along skeletal muscles excess of glucose as glycogen in postprandial states. In mammals, the liver is the central organ for fatty acid metabolism and a key player in glucose metabolism. The liver acts as a crossroad, which metabolically connects various organs, especially skeletal muscle, and adipose tissues, in the endeavor to maintain the long-term energy supply to the body. The regulation of liver glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism is tightly controlled by dietary, hormonal, and neural signals through the activation of various transcriptional factors and coactivators, which will be discussed.

CREB, a transcription factor, contains a basic leucine zipper motif and a DNA-binding basic region. CREB binds to the cAMP response element (CRE, 5′-TGACGTCA-3′) [20] in the promoter region of rate-limiting gluconeogenic gene, such as G6pc and Pck1, to upregulate gluconeogenesis in the liver. In the fast state, elevated blood glucagon activates the cAMP-PKA pathway and the phosphorylation of CREB at S133 by PKA, leading to the recruitment of CBP/P300 to CREB (Figure 1) [21,22]. Activated PKA also mediates the dephosphorylation of CRTC2 [21,22]. Phosphorylation of CRTC2 by SIK2 excludes CRTC2 from the nucleus; however, activated PKA can phosphorylate SIK2 at Ser587 and suppress SIK2 activity, therefore, negating its inhibition on CRTC2 [23], thus preventing CRTC2 degradation. Dephosphorylation of CBP leads to its association with CREB [24]. These events result in the formation of the CREB-CBP/P300-CRTC2 coactivator complex to promote gluconeogenic gene expression and hepatic glucose production (Figure 1). Interestingly, knockdown of the liver CREB by antisense oligonucleotide not only alleviated the hyperglycemia, but also reduced liver lipogenesis [25], suggesting that CREB can modulate both glucose and lipid metabolism.

FOXO1 transcription factor belongs to the large Forkhead family of proteins containing a highly conserved DNA-binding domain termed the “Forkhead box”. There are four members (FOXO1, FOXO3, FOXO4, and FOXO6) in the FOXO subgroup [26]. Among these proteins, FOXO3 is highly expressed in the brain and FOXO6 is predominantly expressed in the developing brain. FOXO1 is abundant in adipose tissues and liver, and FOXO4 is abundant in muscle tissues [27]. The Forkhead box, a 110 a.a. region located in the N-terminal part of FOXO protein, can bind to DNA containing two of the consensus recognition DNA sequences: DAF-16 family member-binding element (5′-GTAA(C/T)A-3′) [28] or insulin-responsive element (5′-(C/A)(A/C)AAA(C/T)AA-3′). All of the members in the FOXO family can recognize the core DNA sequence (5′-(A/C)AA(C/T)A-3′) [29].

FOXO1 is a major target of insulin signaling and is the direct substrate of protein kinase B (AKT) in response to the stimulation of insulin or growth factors. Phosphorylation of FOXO can alter their subcellular location, DNA binding affinity, and transcriptional activity [30]. Phosphorylation of FOXO1 at S256 by AKT generates a negative charge in the DNA-binding domain, thus hindering DNA binding [31]. The phosphorylation events in FOXO1 can increase its association with 14-3-3 proteins, leading to the translocation of FOXO1 from nucleus to cytoplasm [32]. Therefore, FOXO1 is rendered to inactive and degradation by virtue of its subcellular compartmentalization and diminished DNA binding (Figure 2). In the liver, FOXO1 binds to the promoter region of rate-limiting gluconeogenic genes Pck1 and G6pc to upregulate liver glucose production [33,34,35]. Recent studies from Dr. Guo’s group showed that phosphorylation of FOXO1 at S276 by PKA can retain FOXO1 in the nucleus and increases its stability (Figure 1) [35]. Interestingly, FOXO1 and IRS2 can reciprocally increase each other’s stability and generate a regulatory circuit [36]. FOXO1 can affect the VLDL production through regulation of the expression of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) or ApoC3 [37,38].

ChREBP is an important transcriptional activator of hepatic lipogenesis and fructose metabolism [39,40]. ChREBP binds to a highly conserved carbohydrate response element, C(A/G)(C/T)G(T/C/G)Gnnnnn(C/A)(C/G/A)(C/T/G)G(T/A/G)G, on the promoter of target genes [41]. ChREBP is activated by increased glucose influx and drives the gene expression of the rate-limiting glycolytic pyruvate kinase in liver, and acts in synergy with SREBP-1 (see below) to drive expression of genes involved in de novo fatty acid synthesis (lipogenesis) and esterification, such as ACC, FASN, SCD1, and Elovl6 (Figure 3) [41,42]. Therefore, in the feeding state, excessive blood glucose can be split into pyruvate and channeled into lipogenesis in the liver. Additionally, in the feeding state, glucose will be converted to xylulose 5-phosphate through the pentose phosphate pathway to glucose 6-phosphate (Figure 3). Activation of PP2A by xylulose 5-phosphate, and subsequently, the dephosphorylation of ChREBP by PP2A [41], together with the binding of glucose 6-phosphate to ChREBP render its translocation to the nucleus [43]. ChREBP plays a role in regulating fructose metabolism because loss of liver ChREBP reduces the expression of fructokinase and triose kinase, leading to fructose intolerance [40]. In the fasting state, activated PKA by elevated blood glucagon phosphorylate ChREBP at S196 and T666 leads to the disassociation of ChREBP from the promoters of target genes and binding to 14-3-3, which excludes ChREBP from the nucleus and retains it in the cytoplasm [41,44]. Since ChREBP can activate G6pc expression, ingested fructose can be converted to glucose in the liver and be released into circulation to exacerbate hyperglycemia [45]. Conversely, the gene expression levels of ChREBP are positively correlated with hepatosteatosis and negatively related to liver glycogen contents and insulin resistance.

SREBPs, transcription factors and the master regulators of cellular lipid metabolism and homeostasis, are involved in various physiological and pathological processes of lipid synthesis [46]. There are two SREBP genes, SREBP-1 and SREBP-2, that give rise to three SREBP proteins: SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c and SREBP-2. SREBP-1 is mainly involved in fatty acid synthesis and SREBP-2 in cholesterol synthesis. SREBP-1c and SREBP-2 are the predominant isoforms expressed in the liver. The regulation of these gene expressions is in a feed-forward manner because their promoters harbor the sterol regulatory element (SRE, 5′-ATCACNCCAC-3′) [47]. To activate the transcription of target genes, SREBPs must be transported to the Golgi complex, where they are cleaved by two functionally distinct proteases, namely, Site-1 protease (S1P, also known as MBTPS1) and Site-2 protease (S2P, also known as MBTPS2). Then, the transcriptionally active fragment of SREBP is released into the cytosol and then migrates into the nucleus. This activation by proteolytic processing is tightly regulated by the interaction with ER membrane proteins, SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), and insulin-induced gene (Insig) [48]. Under conditions of deprived sterols, SCAP escorts SREBPs from the ER to the Golgi complex through incorporation into COPII-coated vesicles. Subsequently, SREBPs are cleaved by S1P and S2P within the Golgi. With increased cholesterol content (high sterols), Insig binds to SCAP to retain SCAP/SREBPs on the ER membrane as an inactive precursor [49].

SREBP-1c preferentially upregulates gene expressions that are related to fatty acids and triglyceride synthesis, such as ACC, FASN, SCD1, and GPGT, while SREBP-2 mainly controls gene expressions required for cholesterol synthesis and uptake, such as HMGS, HMGR, and LDL receptor [46]. Insulin or feeding can drastically increase the mRNA levels of SREBP-1c [50,51], through the mTOR, and requires LXR and C/EBPβ (Figure 3) [52]. Insulin also regulates the expression of Insig-1 and Insig-2, two important inhibitors for the proteolytic activation of SREBPs [53,54]. Since overexpression of either SREBP-1c or SREBP-1a in mouse liver markedly increased the expression of lipogenic genes and causes massive hepatosteatosis [55], hyperinsulinemia in obesity or early stage of T2DM would stimulate the expression of SREBP-1, thus leading to the development of steatosis.

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has emerged as a key player in the progression of insulin resistance and the promotion of lipid accumulation in the liver since it can transduce some effects of lipid metabolites and cytokines into the activation of stress kinases [56]. ER stress leads to the cellular response termed the unfolded protein response (UPR) through the activation of three canonical pathways: IRE1-XBP1s, PERK-eIF2, and ATF6 [57,58]. Solid evidence has demonstrated the elevation of the UPR in the liver of patients with diabetes, obesity, and NAFLD, whereas administration of the chemical chaperones 4-phenyl butyric acid (PBA) or taurine-conjugated ursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) to ob/ob mice normalized blood glucose levels, improved insulin sensitivity, and reduced hepatic steatosis [59,60]. ER stress is able to induce the entire lipogenic program, and the attenuation of ER stress in ob/ob mice which decreases SREBP1c activation and triglyceride contents in the liver [61]. In particular, the IRE1-XBP1 pathway is critical for lipogenesis [62,63].

XBP is a bZIP member of the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors. This gene consists of six exons and encodes 261 amino acids in the normal condition. However, the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER leads to the activation of IRE1α, and activated IRE1α excises a 26-nucleotide intron of the XBP1 mRNA and shifts the coding reading frame, resulting in the expression of a more stable and active form known as XBP1s (for the spliced form) with 276 amino acids [64,65]. XBP1s is an important transcription factor that drives SREBP1 gene (Srebf1) expression [66]. Coactivator P300 can be induced by XBP1s, thus increasing glucose production in the liver (see below) [67,68]. Researchers recent study revealed that the activation of IRE1-XBP1 signaling by insulin-activated AKT increases XBP1s to stimulate liver lipogenesis in the fed state (Figure 3), while in the fasted state augmentation of XBP1u (the unspliced form) upregulates liver gluconeogenesis to maintain the euglycemia [69]. Thus, XBP1s can affect both glucose and lipid metabolism.

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-regulated transcriptional factors involved in a broad spectrum of biological processes [70]. No ligand-binding orphan receptors were also included in this superfamily, and currently, this superfamily comprises of 48 members. NRs play several roles in the regulation of physiological processes of metabolism, development, cell proliferation, immune response, reproduction, and pathological processes such as metabolic syndromes and cancer, as well as neurological disorders. Members in this family share similar protein homology, a transactivation domain at the N-terminal, a DNA-binding domain followed by a hinge domain, and a ligand-binding domain at the C-terminal [71]. The binding of a ligand to the ligand-binding domain transforms the NRs into transcriptionally competent factors. Based on structural and phylogenetic analysis, NRs are divided into six distinct groups. The dysregulation of NRs contributes to the development of several diseases, including diabetes, cancer, etc. Several NRs can play important roles in regulating liver glucose and lipid metabolism which are discussed below.

Discovered 30 years ago, PPARs (consisting of three isotypes: PPARα, β/δ, and γ) are important metabolic regulators of systemic energy homeostasis. They are ligand-inducible transcriptional factors that belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily. However, each of them contains different functions and expression abundance within the targeting tissues [72]. All PPARs, like other NRs, have an N-terminal activation domain, a central DNA-binding domain, a cofactor-binding flexible hinge region, and a ligand-binding domain at the C-terminal. Ligand binding, heterodimerization with RXR, and interaction with coactivators lead to the full activation of transcriptional activity of genes containing PPAR response element (PPRE, 5′-AGGTCANAGGTCA-3′) and each PPAR member is preferentially bound by distinct ligands [73]. PPARs can be activated by natural lipid-derived metabolites, dietary lipids, and synthetic compounds, including fibrates and TZD, to augment target gene expression in the liver, muscle, and adipose tissues.

PPARα is highly expressed in the metabolic tissues, such as liver and skeletal muscle, with high mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. The expression of PPARα is regulated by insulin, leptin, growth hormones, glucocorticoids, and stress. Fasting increases fatty acid oxidation by induction of PPARα to provide ATP and GTP for the energy-demanding gluconeogenesis process in the liver. Leptin can upregulate PPARα expression through changes of fatty acids flux [74]. In the presence of PGC-1α, adiponectin also upregulates PPARα-responsive gene expression [75]. However, both insulin and growth hormone downregulate PPARα expression [76,77]. PPARα target genes can regulate lipid and glucose metabolism and inflammatory responses [78]. PPARα functions primarily in the liver and controls directly or indirectly the gene expressions of FATP, CD36, FABP, CPT1α and 2, LCAD, VLCAD, ECI1, and ACOX to regulate fatty acids uptake, binding, transport, synthesis, oxidation, storage, and ketogenesis [79,80]. Liver-specific PPARα knockout mice exerted increased liver lipid accumulation and hypercholesterolemia [81]. In the fed state, PPARα can control lipogenesis and allows the use of nutrients to generate fatty acids [82] because activation of PPARα increases the levels of mature nuclear form SREBP-1c via proteolytic cleavage [83].

PPARβ/δ is expressed ubiquitously as well as in most metabolically active tissues and plays a role in fatty acid oxidation and glucose metabolism. Activation of PPARβ/δ ameliorates hyperglycemia by reducing liver glucose production and increasing lipogenesis in the liver, and HFD-fed PPARβ/δ null mice exhibited increased VLDL production [84]. PPARγ consists of γ1, γ2, and γ4 isoforms in humans and is abundant in adipose tissues, but γ2 can be induced in the liver and muscle tissues [85,86]. PPARγ has an essential role in regulating adipocyte differentiation, lipid storage, insulin sensitivity, and glucose metabolism [87]. Activation of PPARγ by TZDs improves hyperglycemia and insulin sensitivity in patients with T2DM [88]. Knockout of liver PPARγ reduced liver steatosis, but elevated blood triglycerides and free fatty acids in addition to exacerbating hyperglycemia and insulin resistance [89].

LXRs, consisting of two isoforms (LXRα/β), are the transcriptional factors of the NR superfamily and play an important role in the control of cholesterol and lipid metabolism [90]. LXRα is highly expressed in the metabolic tissues—liver, intestine, adipose tissues, and macrophages—while LXRβ is expressed ubiquitously [91]. LXRs heterodimerize with retinoid X receptor (RXR) and bind to target gene promoters on LXR-responsive-element (LXRE). The canonical LXRE is composed of the repeated sequence AGGTCA, separated by four nucleotides [92]. A number of cholesterol derivatives, such as oxysterols and desmosterol, and synthetic ligands, can function as LXR activators [90,93]. Without the ligand binding, the LXR/RXR complex binds to corepressors: nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) and the silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT) to inhibit target gene expression. When either LXRs or RXR are activated by their ligands, the corepressors will be replaced by coactivators P300 and nuclear receptor coactivator 1, leading to the expression of target genes related to lipid metabolism [94]. The LXRα knockout mice had massive accumulation of cholesterol in the liver when fed a high-cholesterol diet [95]. Activation of LXRs increase bile acid synthesis and biliary cholesterol excretion through upregulation gene expression of Cyp7a1 and Abcg5/8, respectively [95,96]. Activation of LXRs stimulates transport from peripheral tissues to the liver for bile acid synthesis and excretion, thus decreasing the cellular cholesterol levels accomplished through the upregulation of the expression of the ATP bonding cassette (ABC) A1/G1 and reducing the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) [97]. Activation of LXRs also increased liver triglyceride levels through increasing de novo lipogenesis by upregulating the expression of SREBP1c and ChREBP [98,99].

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor and a ligand-activated transcriptional factor involved in the regulation of bile acid synthesis by controlling bile acid synthesis, transport, and metabolism, the enterohepatic cycle, glucose and lipid homeostasis, oxidative stress, and inflammation [100]. Four FXR isoforms are generated through an alternative promoter and RNA splicing. FXR is mainly expressed in the liver, intestines, and kidneys. In the liver, FXR modulates bile acid synthesis via inhibition of CYP7A1 [101]. FXR stimulates bile acid secretion by increasing the bile acid export pump and multidrug related protein, meanwhile, FXR reduces bile acid reabsorption. Activation of FXR protects against liver accumulation of bile acids; consequently, FXR knockout mice exhibit significantly increased bile acid levels in the liver, suggesting that FXR primarily regulates bile acid homeostasis and is a therapeutic target of cholestatic liver diseases [102]. Furthermore, FXR activation leads to reduction of liver triglyceride levels through upregulation of carboxylesterase 1 and PPARα as well as downregulation of SREBP1c [103,104]. FXR knockout mice exhibit increased blood glucose levels and insulin intolerance; however, activation of FXR reduces liver gluconeogenesis by inhibiting the expression of Pck1 and G6pc [103].

HNF4 is a transcriptional factor belonging to the orphan nuclear receptors in the NR superfamily and its expression and activities are restricted to the liver and gastrointestinal tract while containing two isoforms (HNF4α and HNF4γ) [105,106]. HNF4 proteins have an additional repressor domain with an inhibitory function [107]. Interestingly, fatty acids could present constitutively in the ligand-binding domain, making HNF4 different from other members in the NR superfamily [108]. HNF4 has critical roles in liver development and regulation of liver functions through controlling the expression of liver-specific genes related to glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, urea production, bile acid synthesis, apolipoprotein synthesis, and drug metabolism [109]. Inactivation mutations in HNF4α result in insulin secretion defects [110]. Liver-specific HNF4α-null mice exhibited increased fat accumulation in the liver, drastic reduction of liver gluconeogenesis, along with reduced blood cholesterol and triglyceride levels [111]. Post-translational modification of HNF4 can modulate its transcriptional activity [112,113].

The genetic material of DNA is wrapped around core histones that form nucleosomes, the fundamental organizing unit, within the chromatin of all eukaryotic genomes [114]. The efficient packaging of the genetic material in the chromatin forms a physical barrier to RNA polymerase and transcription factors for preventing unnecessary gene transcription. To initiate gene transcription, histones undergo post-translational modifications (PTM) and changes to their chemical properties to unwrap chromatin. The core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) are rich in positively charged Lys residues, which bind to the negatively charged DNA backbone. However, acetylation masks the positive charges leading to the condensed chromatin being loosened and the chromatin being opened in order to be transcriptionally accessible to transcriptional factors and coactivators as well as the formation of the transcription apparatus [115,116]. Acetylation is a reversible process in which histone acetyltransferases (HATs) add an acetyl group to the lysine residue of the target protein, whereby, histone deacetylases (HDACs) remove the acetyl group. HATs and HDACs are major histone family proteins which regulate the post translational modifications process [117].

Coactivators can interact with other transcriptional factors and nuclear receptors to increase the gene transcription rate and are required for effective transcription of many eukaryotic genes through modification of constraint chromatin and activator recruitment of the transcriptional apparatus. To date, acetylation is the best understood and well-studied histone modification and the status of histone acetylation is closely related to transcriptional activation and silencing. HAT transfers an acetyl group to the ξ-amino groups of the lysine side chain within a histone or target protein, while the acetyl group can be removed by HDACs. HAT is classified by three different types based on their sequence homology, structure, and functional similarity.

In humans, there are 30 known HATs which are grouped into five families: GCN5- related N-acetyltransferase, MYST, CBP/P300, the general transcription factor HATs, and the nuclear hormone-related (SRC/NCoA) HATs [118,119]. GCN5 can regulate glucose and iron metabolism [120,121]. MYST histone acetyl transferases have been implicated in uncontrolled cell growth and malignancy in several human cancer types [122]; however, their role in regulating metabolism is not well documented. CBP/P300 contains three cysteine–histidine-rich domains, bromodomain, and an acetyl transferases domain that are involved in several signal transduction pathways to regulate metabolism and energy homeostasis [123,124]. CBP/P300 can act as histone acetyltransferases as well as transcriptional coactivators. The acetyltransferase activity of CBP/P300 transfers the acetyl group to lysine residues in histones, causing chromatin remodeling, and these proteins can bind to the transcriptional start sites and function as a coactivator with transcriptional factors to initiate target gene expression. CBP and P300 are ubiquitously expressed [125]. They are closely related proteins sharing numerous near identical regions and a similar structure including four cysteine–histidine-rich regions (CH1-3), the KIX domain (CREB-binding site), the bromodomain, the HAT domain, and the steroid receptor coactivator-1 interaction domain (SID) [126].

To protect organisms against hypoglycemia during fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia by the opposing actions of insulin signaling and glucagon signaling pathways, blood glucose levels are maintained within a narrow, defined range (70–110 mg/dL, fasting). In the fasted state, glucagon stimulates liver glucose production through the cAMP-PKA signaling pathway and phosphorylation of CREB at S133 by PKA (Figure 1) [127]. Phosphorylation of CREB at Ser133 leads to the recruitment CBP, P300, and CRTC2 to CREB and the formation of the CREB coactivator complex on the promoters of the rate-limiting gluconeogenic genes, Pck1 and G6pc, to stimulate gene expression and glucose production in the liver [21,24,128]. P300 can acetylate CRTC2 at K628 to prevent CRTC2 nuclear exclusion and degradation [129]. Furthermore, FOXO1 upregulates gluconeogenesis through activation of Pck1 and G6pc gene expression in the liver [130,131]. Researcher's study showed that P300 stimulates Foxo1 gene expression in the fasted state through binding to the tandem cAMP-response element sites in the proximal promoter region of the Foxo1 gene [132]. Since FOXO1 binds to insulin responsive sequence (IRS) on the gluconeogenic gene, the coordinated effects of P300 and FOXO1 can fully activate the gluconeogenic program (Figure 1).

In the fed and postprandial states, elevated insulin levels will reduce blood glucose levels, and the gluconeogenic engine—the CREB-CBP/P300 complex—needs to be turned off and glucose will be used to generate glycogen and stored in the liver. Interestingly, insulin can also stimulate the phosphorylation of CREB at S133 [21], suggesting that CREB is constitutively phosphorylated at S133. CBP can be phosphorylated at S436 by atypical PKCι/λ (Figure 2) [22], leading to its dissociation from the CREB coactivator complex. However, P300 lacks the corresponding S436 phosphorylation site found in CBP, therefore, P300 constitutively binds to CREB to maintain the basal gluconeogenesis in the fed and postprandial states [24]. Physiologic concentration of glucose could not effectively promote glycogen synthesis when glucose was the sole substrate and efficient glycogen synthesis occurred when gluconeogenic precursors were added [133]. It has been proven that the gluconeogenic pathway contributes for 50–70% of newly synthesized glycogen during the postprandial state [134,135,136]. To mimic the phosphorylation site found in CBP, a phosphorylation-competent P300G422S knock-in mouse model was generated. These P300 knock-in mice had significantly decreased liver glycogen content and produced significantly less glycogen in a tracer incorporation assay in the postprandial state, indicating an important and unique role of P300 in glycogen synthesis through maintaining basal gluconeogenesis [137]. Moreover, both P300 and CBP can acetylate other proteins such as FXR, SREBP-1, and FOXO1 to modulate gene expression related to glucose and lipid metabolism (see below section) [138,139,140].

CRTC proteins, also known as transducers of regulated CREB activity, regulate the metabolic flux by controlling the important enzymes within the metabolic process. CRTC proteins have CREB-binding domain (amino terminus), transactivation domain (carboxy terminus), and regulatory domain (central part) which bind to the CREB and other bZIP (basic leucine zipper) proteins, basic transcriptional machineries, and enzymes [20]. Among the CRTC isoforms, CRTC2 can regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in a tissue-specific manner, including the liver, pancreas, the small intestines, and adipose tissues [141]. During fasting conditions, CRTC2 increases the gluconeogenic flux in the liver by activating Pck1 and G6pc genes [21]. Activated AKT by insulin through the PI3K-AKT pathway can activate SIK2, leading to the phosphorylation of CRTC2 at Ser171, and subsequently, the phosphorylated CRTC2 is excluded from the nucleus and degraded in the cytoplasm (Figure 2) [21]. However, activated PKA can drive CRTC2 translocation into the nucleus through inhibition of SIK2 [23].

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1α) is a master transcriptional coactivator for mitochondrial biogenesis in brown adipose tissues [142]. This coactivator also regulates the transcription of genes related to gluconeogenesis, glucose transport, glycogenolysis, fatty acid oxidation, energy homeostasis, and mitochondrial activity in the liver [143,144,145]. In the fasted state, activation of cAMP-PKA by glucagon leads to the phosphorylation of CREB at S133 and recruitment of CBP to the promoter of PGC-1α to stimulate the PGC-1α gene expression, subsequently, PGC-1α coactivates HNF4α to upregulate the rate-limiting gluconeogenic gene expression of Pck1 and G6pc (Figure 1) [143,146]. Ιnterestingly, PGC-1a can affect insulin signaling and glucose metabolism by regulating the ratio of IRS1 and IRS2 in the liver [147].

PGC-1α has an important role in the regulation of lipid metabolism in the liver as well [148]. Mitochondrial dysfunction results in decreased fatty acid oxidation and is implicated in the development of hepatic steatosis. Overexpression of PGC-1α in hepatocytes elevates mitochondrial content and function, leading to an increase in fatty acid oxidation and reduction of triglyceride levels and VLDL synthesis and secretion [149]. On the other hand, heterozygous liver-specific PGC-1α knockout mice exhibited decreased expression of genes related to mitochondrial β oxidation and accumulation of triglycerides in the liver [144]. Furthermore, mice fed on a choline-deficient diet increased fat accumulation in the liver in part through impaired PGC-1α activity [150].

Corepressors comprise multiple proteins including DNA-binding proteins, histone methyltransferases, HDACs, Silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT), Nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR), G-protein sippressor 2 (GPS2), transducing β-like protein (TBL1), and TBL-related 1 (TBLR1). Corepressors function as transcriptional silencers through interaction with many transcriptional factors, resulting in inactivation of a variety of chromatin remodeling enzymes to alter metabolism [151,152,153,154]. NCoR/SMRT/HDAC3 have a large NR-binding surface that interacts with multiple NR targets, thereby to regulate the liver metabolism [155]. Notably, HDAC3 can interact with PPARγ to impair insulin sensitivity in obese models and NCoR/HDAC3 can alter lipogenic enzymes through MeCP2 (Metyl-CpG-binding protein 2) [156]. In line with these studies, depletion of NCoR1/SMRT leads to metabolic abnormalities, including hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and weight loss [156].