COVID-19 Vaccination and Alcohol Consumption: Justification of Risks: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Pavel A. Solopov

Since the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, pharmaceutical companies and research institutions have been actively working to develop vaccines, and the mass roll-out of vaccinations against COVID-19 began in January 2021. At the same time, during lockdowns, the consumption of alcoholic beverages increased. During the peak of vaccination, consumption remained at high levels around the world, despite the gradual relaxation of quarantine restrictions. Two of the popular queries on search engines were whether it is safe to drink alcohol after vaccination and whether this will affect the effectiveness of vaccines. Many studies have been published suggesting that excessive drinking not only worsens the course of an acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus but can also exacerbate post-COVID-19 syndrome. Despite all sorts of online speculation, there is no specific scientific data on alcohol-induced complications after vaccination in the literature. Most of the published vaccine clinical trials do not include groups of patients with a history of alcohol-use disorders.

  • COVID-19
  • vaccines
  • alcohol

1. Introduction

Alcohol consumption, especially chronic heavy drinking, has an impact on human health, particularly on the components of both innate and adaptive immunity [1][2]. A large number of early and recent studies have demonstrated that both short- and long-term alcohol consumption leads to a severe decrease in lymphocytes [3][4]. Alterations in immunoglobulins IgA and IgM have been observed in men and women who drink alcohol [5][6]. Ethanol dose- and time-dependently modulates the functions of monocytes and dendritic cells, thereby affecting phagocytosis and inflammatory cytokine production [7]. Interactions between alcohol and the immune system may also influence the development and progression of some types of cancer [8]. It is generally accepted that moderate alcohol consumption, unlike chronic alcohol intoxication, enhances the response to classical vaccines [1]. Tragic events are taking place in the modern world, and they are affecting mental health and increasing global alcohol consumption. However, the same events are stimulating the development of biotechnology and the production of vaccines. Immediately after the COVID-19 lockdown was announced, there was a significant increase in the retail sales of alcohol, with a simultaneous decrease in the retail sales of food, indicating an increase in domestic alcohol consumption during this period [9]. Some countries completely prohibited the sale of liquor, while others reported an increase in activity in the alcohol black market [10][11]. It is known that people who have problems with alcohol experience strong anxiety and drink more to cope with it [12]. Mass methanol poisoning occurred in Iran and led to the deaths of more than 700 people in March 2020 after a rumor circulated in the country that drinking alcohol can prevent being infected by the new virus [13].
Mental health researchers reported that the news about the developed vaccines and their “emergency use” status created an additional feeling of anxiety and fear and that people had great doubts about the vaccines’ efficiency and safety [14][15][16][17]. The clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines, approved in the USA, did not explicitly include individuals with alcohol-use disorders [18]. A published study indicating that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alone may cause acute lung injury in mice caused a great resonance in the press and resulted in questions about whether the new vaccines are safe [19]. A later published a study showing that alcohol exposure exacerbates spike-protein-induced lung damage [20].

2. The Impacts of Alcohol Consumption on the Immune System

Alcohol modulates both innate and adaptive immunity. Several lines of evidence suggest that epithelial cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, as the first lines of immune defense, are the most susceptible to high doses of alcohol. Ethanol weakens the ability of leucocytes to migrate to sites of infection; induces functional abnormalities in T and B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and macrophages; and alters cytokine expression [21]. Elevated serum levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin (IL-6), together with decreased IL-10, interferon γ (IFN-γ), and IL-2 levels, are the usual parameters of patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease [22][23].
Many published articles suggest that alcohol consumption has a dose-dependent effect on the response to infection. Those with alcohol disorders are 3–7 times more susceptible to bacterial pneumonia and tuberculosis, and they are prone to the progression of chronic viral infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C [7]. Alcohol metabolism varies from person to person. It depends not only on the sex and constitution of the person but also on the content of metabolizing enzymes in the liver [24]. The liver, an important component of the innate immune system, when damaged due to chronic alcohol abuse, results in the decreased production of antibacterial proteins, thereby increasing the susceptibility to bacterial or viral infection. Patients with alcohol disorders also have an increased susceptibility to respiratory pathogens and an increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [25].
Not only chronic alcohol use can lead to negative effects on the immune system [2]. In fact, studies show that heavy drinking also affects the immune system. It has been reported that patients with acute alcohol intoxication are more prone to peritonitis development following penetrating abdominal trauma [26]. In experimental models, acute alcohol intoxication has been demonstrated to impair the mucociliary defense of airways against invading pathogens [27].
However, some animal and clinical studies suggest that moderate alcohol consumption reinforces the immune response to infection and vaccination. In a clinical study that included 391 patients with a cold who were exposed to different respiratory viruses, Co-hen et al., found that consuming a large number of alcoholic drinks (3–4/day) decreased the risk of developing colds that were confirmed by clinical symptoms and specific antibody titers [28]. Some of the health benefits of moderate beer consumption may be due to its ability to interfere with pro-inflammatory cytokine cascades [29].
It should be remembered that the severity of the effects of the immune status in people with alcohol-use disorders depends not only on the time of consumption and the amount of alcohol but also on age, sex, body composition, environmental factors, and even the type of alcoholic beverage [30]. Antioxidants and polyphenols found in red wine and phytoestrogens and vitamins found in beer could be protectors against immune cell damage and cytokine overexpression [31][32][33]. Ethanol can harm immune cells due to the formation of free radicals during metabolism, but antioxidants should provide protection against this [34]. Interestingly, the degree of a hangover the day after alcohol consumption does not affect alcohol-induced immune changes [35].

3. “Spike Effect” of COVID-19 Vaccines and Alcohol

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S protein, SP) is a clove-shaped transmembrane structural glycoprotein that is localized on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus [36]. This unit is responsible for the recognition of and the binding to the host cell angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor (ACE2), thus making the S protein the main target of neutralizing antibodies [37]. The large ectodomain of coronavirus S proteins includes two subunits, subunit 1 (S1), containing a receptor-binding domain (RBD), and the membrane-fusion subunit 2 (S2). The S protein is an ideal target for vaccine development on different platforms because it has a high antigenicity and the ability to induce a robust immune response [38]. Almost all types of COVID-19 vaccines run the endogenous synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Synthetized S proteins move via blood circulation, interacting with ACE2 receptors and demonstrating the pathological features of SARS-CoV-2 [39]. A maximum concentration (14.6 μg/mL) of S proteins in blood serum was detected 24 h after vaccination and was reduced within 10 days [40]. Suggestions have been published that the spike protein may be responsible for the long-term effects of COVID-19, such as rare neurological complications, including Guillain–Barre syndrome and Bell’s palsy [41]. A growing body of research points to the potential dangers of the spike protein, even in the absence of the intact virus. The S protein has been reported to mediate pro-inflammatory and/or damaging (of various etiologies) responses in various human cell types [42][43]. Systemic inflammation, induced by the spike protein, may proceed through the TLR2-dependent activation of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway [44]. There are several in vitro studies suggesting the negative impact of the S protein on endothelial barrier function [45][46][47]. Other reports indicate that the S protein induces an inflammatory response in human corneal epithelial cells and binds to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), enhancing its pro-inflammatory activity [48][49]. Several publications have reported that the spike protein leads to hemagglutination, blood coagulation, and thrombosis [50][51]. Boschi et al. showed that the Wuhan, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron B.1.1.529 variants of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mixed with human erythrocytes led to hemagglutination [52].
There is evidence to suggest that alcohol consumption may cause the activation of the ACE2 receptor and, consequently, enhance the negative effect of the spike protein (Figure 1). Balasubramanian et al., observed an increase in ACE2 in brain expression in both chronic alcohol exposure and abrupt withdrawal from alcohol [53]. Reportedly, alcohol consumption induced the intracellular accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to the activation of NF-κB and an increase in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [54]. Moreover, alcohol could be an independent cause of syndromes, similar to COVID-19-vaccine-related side effects. A few recent clinical cases discussed the possibility that heavy alcohol consumption may play a role in the pathogenesis of Guillain–Barré syndrome [55][56]. Another study demonstrated that alcohol abuse was negatively associated with Bell’s palsy occurrence [57]. Thus, it can be assumed that alcohol consumption may provoke or enhance the “spike effect” of COVID-19 vaccines.
/media/item_content/202302/63db09adbf001pathogens-12-00163-g001.png
Figure 1. Ethanol-induced overexpression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activates pro-inflammatory nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) signaling pathway and exacerbates the “spike effect” of COVID-19 vaccines.

4. Protein Subunit Vaccines and Alcohol

Recombinant subunit vaccines contain purified and inactivated “subunits” of the pathogens. Their immunogenic properties can be amplified by immunopotentiating adjuvant systems or by means of targeting immunoreactive sites [58]. This approach of vaccine development has already been used for several other vaccines, including the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, pneumococcal polysaccharide and meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines, pneumococcal conjugate and meningococcal conjugate vaccines, and recombinant influenza vaccine RIV4 [59].
The vaccine manufactured by Novavax (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) is the only recombinant subunit COVID-19 vaccine currently authorized for use in the United States by the FDA. The WHO added it to the Emergency Use Listing for 38 countries [60][61]. NVX-CoV2373 contains a saponin-based Matrix-M1 adjuvant and a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nanoparticle vaccine from the full-length, wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S protein [59]. NVX-CoV2373 induces a relatively broad humoral and cellular immune response consisting of robust and polyfunctional CD4+ T cells and a modest CD8+ T cell response [62]. In Phase 3 clinical studies, most vaccine side effects were mild to moderate [60].
There are several ongoing clinical trials for other S-protein subunit recombinant COVID-19 vaccines based on the S1 subunit or RBD protein (Covax19, Nanocovax, SCTV01C, GBP510, etc.), showing good effectiveness and safety [59]. However, in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice model, only subunit 1 of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, instilled intratracheally, provoked acute lung injury and cytokine storm in lungs, unlike the whole S protein. A recently published a study demonstrating that K18-hACE2 transgenic mice on a Lieber–DeCarli ’82 ethanol liquid diet exhibit a more severe SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Subunit 1-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) than corresponding mice on a normal diet. Lung tissue homogenates from mice on alcohol diet showed the overexpression of ACE2 [20]. The S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein exerted hippocampal neuronal cell death in mice, affecting brain functions [63]. More additional studies are needed to evaluate the safety of S-protein subunits on all organs and systems.

5. Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines and Alcohol

Vaccines based on inactivated pathogens have been used for over a hundred years as a protective agent against bacteria and viruses. Inactivated viral vaccines are first cultivated on a substrate (primary and continuous cell lines, tissues, fertilized eggs, and even whole organisms) to produce large amounts of antigens [64]. The multiplied virus in the substrate is purified, concentrated, and inactivated by various chemical agents (ascorbic acid, hydrogen peroxide, etc.) or by using physical methods (heat, ultraviolet exposure, gamma irradiation, etc.). In recent decades, only formaldehyde and β-Propiolactone have been used as inactivated agents for human viral vaccines [65]. Adjuvants are important components of many inactivated vaccines due to their ability to induce more robust and long-lasting specific immune responses [66]. Aluminum salts, such as aluminum hydroxide, phosphate, and potassium sulfate, have been widely used in vaccines for a long time [67].
Developed in China, the inactivated whole-virus vaccine Sinopharm (Beijing, China) BBIBP-CorV, containing an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, has been approved by the WHO for emergency use, and it has been distributed in more than 40 countries [68]. Another Chinese vaccine approved by the WHO is CoronaVac (Sinovac (Beijing, China)), an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 aluminum-hydroxide-adjuvanted vaccine created from African green monkey kidney cells (Vero cells) that have been inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 [69][70]. In both BBIBP-CorV and CoronaVac clinical trials, alcohol addiction was one of the exclusion criteria [71]. No serious adverse reactions to vaccines, which could be aggravated by alcohol consumption, have been reported. A clinical study carried out by Jingwen Ai et al., demonstrated the safety of inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with alcoholic liver disease; however, those patients demonstrated a lower immunologic response to the vaccines than healthy patients [72].

6. Viral-Vector-Based COVID-19 Vaccines and Alcohol

On 29 January 2020, the European Commission granted conditional marketing authorization for the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (Covishield, Vaxzevria (Oxford, UK)), a monovalent vaccine composed of a single recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) vector encoding the S glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. However, five countries in the European Union have since placed age limitations on the vaccine, which has given rise to a certain distrust in it [73]. One of the rare but most severe side effects of this vaccine is a syndrome named vaccine-associated immune thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT) [74]. Usually, the administration of a viral-vector-based COVID-19 vaccine induces the production of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. In very rare cases, VITT antibodies are generated that can bind to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and construct immune complexes that lead to a coagulation cascade and reduce the number of platelets [75]. As of April 2021, there had been 222 registered cases of VITT in Europe [74]. The Victorian Department of Health (Australia) equated this to eight cases of thrombopenia per million doses for the AstraZeneca vaccine [76]. Based on several reported cases, young women, especially those taking hormonal contraceptives, are at the highest risk of developing this vaccine-related adverse reaction [74]. Consequently, the AstraZeneca vaccine has not been authorized for use in the U.S. There have been no reports of Oxford/AstraZeneca-vaccine-related thrombosis and thrombocytopenia complications after alcohol consumption. However, binge alcohol consumption can lead to endothelial dysfunction, which, in combination with stasis and hypercoagulability, could increase venous thromboembolism (VTE) formation [77]. Liver dysfunction, caused by chronic alcohol intoxication, decreases the synthesis of anticoagulant thrombotic factors [78]. Nonetheless, there are also studies suggesting that low or moderate alcohol consumption could decrease the risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in older people [79]. The ethanol treatment of human whole blood led to a decrease in PF4 release in response to a-thrombin [80]. According to Abolmaali’s study, AstraZeneca is the vaccine most reported to be associated with Guillain–Barré syndrome [81]. Summarizing the above facts, it can say that young people who drink alcohol, as well as those who chronically drink alcohol, have an increased risk of complications after immunization with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine (Figure 2).
/media/item_content/202302/63db09da5eb01pathogens-12-00163-g002.png
Figure 2. Alcohol consumption affects the immune response to adenovirus-vector-based vaccines and vaccine-associated immune thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT). Physiologically relevant concentrations of alcohol lead to endothelial dysfunction, which, in combination with stasis and hypercoagulability, could increase venous thromboembolism (VTE) formation. At the same time, small or moderate doses of alcohol have an inhibitory effect on secondary platelet aggregation responses.
The next vaccine, approved by both the FDA and EUA for emergency use in February 2021, was the adenovirus-vector-based vaccine JNJ-78435735 developed by Johnson and Johnson (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) [55] along with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) [82]. The clear advantage of this vaccine over other vector-based vaccines is that it is a single-shot vaccine. However, doctors faced a problem similar to that of the AstraZeneca vaccine—cases of a condition characterized by low platelets and thrombosis, including cerebral venous sinus thrombosis [83]. All cases of VITT occurred among women: 13 cases in 18–49-year-old women and 2 cases among women aged 50 years and older [84]. Following an emergency meeting that was held in December 2021, the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was recommended over the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine [85]. The vaccine label information does not warn against alcohol use, but it can consider that alcohol abuse can increase the risk of VITT in young women.
The Gamaleya National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology (Moscow, Russia) was the first to announce the creation of Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V (Moscow, Russia)), a recombinant adenovirus-based vaccine [86]. Even though Sputnik V has not yet been approved by the WHO, it has been approved in 70 countries with a combined population of more than 4 billion people [87]. Sputnik V consists of two doses containing different components of the SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein S gene, Ad26 and Ad5, administered separately 21 days apart [88]. The latter Ad’s immune complexes activate the dendritic T-cell axis [89]. A large proportion of this population, especially Africans, have high anti-Ad5 antibody titers from previous infections [90]. In an experiment on DO11.10 transgenic mice, it was shown that alcohol diminishes the capacity of dendritic cells to secrete interleukins IL-12 and IL-6 and reduces the ability to maintain the secretion of cytokines IL-17A and IFN-c but increases IL-13 expression [91]. Thompson et al., reported that ethanol promotes a reduced immune stimulatory capacity of female DC by reducing IL-12 production [92]. Thus, alcohol consumption after the second dose of the Sputnik V vaccine may significantly compromise its effectiveness, especially in some population categories. A Ministry of Health official representative warned that anyone being vaccinated against COVID-19 with Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine should give up alcohol for almost two months [93]. Interestingly, the Phase 3 trial on patients who received the Sputnik V vaccine showed only one patient with vein thrombosis unlike the above adenovirus-vector-based vaccines [87].

7. mRNA-Based Vaccines and Alcohol Consumption

The first report of protein production following reporter gene mRNA in mice was published by Wolff at al. in 1990 [94]. During that period, pharmaceutical companies did not consider mRNA a prospective technology because of doubts about its stability and its low efficacy [95]. Despite mRNA vaccines representing only 11% of all the developed COVID-19 vaccines, two mRNA vaccines, mRNA-1273 and BNT162b, were the first vaccines approved by the FDA and EUA for COVID-19 [96]. Both new mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2, manufactured by Pfizer/BioNTech, and mRNA-1273, produced by Moderna, contain molecules of RNA, modified with pseudo-uridine and encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle vehicle. The Pfizer–BioNTech and Moderna vaccine constructs do not contain an S-protein S1/S2 furin cleavage site. Ribonucleic acid is endowed to be rapidly translated into nonactive SARS-CoV-2 S proteins in a stable closed structure in order to induce the immune response without causing cell damage due to its interaction with the ACE2 receptor [97]. However, these two vaccines were the most feared among people at the initial stage of vaccination due to the lack of data on their long-term side effects.

The S protein encoded by the vaccine is stabilized in its pre-fusion form; thus, it is possible that, if it enters the bloodstream and is distributed systemically throughout the human body, it may contribute to adverse effects [98]. Ndeupen et al., reported that the mRNA platform’s lipid nanoparticle (LNP) component used in preclinical vaccine studies causes a highly inflammatory response in mice. LNPs administrated intra-dermally, intramuscularly, or intranasally at a dose of 10 μg/mouse led to severe neutrophil infiltration, the activation of inflammatory pathways, and cytokine and chemokine production [99]. Such a reaction, in combination with the spike effect, can increase the negative consequences of vaccination in the body.
Among Japanese healthcare workers who were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, alcohol consumption, along with other factors, was identified as a factor predicting lower IgG antibody titers after vaccination [100]. Wang et al., in their study of vaccinated patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), including alcohol disorders, demonstrated that patients with SUDs remain vulnerable to COVID-19 breakthrough infection, even after full vaccination. The risk was higher in patients who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine than in those who received the Moderna vaccine [18].
Several cases of myocarditis have been reported following the administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines [101]. After the self-controlled case series, studies found that myocarditis after vaccination is higher in men younger than 40 years old, particularly after the second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine [102]. Excessive alcohol consumption can cause non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and chronic heart disease, characterized by dilation and the impaired contraction of myocardial ventricles [103]. Of all alcohol-related myocardiopathy cases, 30% were myocarditis with a lymphocytic infiltrate in association with myocyte degeneration or focal necrosis [104]. Most people who heavily drink alcohol do not have any symptoms in the earlier stages of the disease, and many never develop clinical heart failure [105]. A case of vasospastic angina (VSA) caused by alcohol consumption following Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination has been reported [106]. Thus, a patient who chronically drinks alcohol, unaware of the presence of heart problems, could exacerbate them with an injection of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Mark J. Mulligan et al., reported that up to 50% of patients demonstrated a decrease in lymphocytes after the first dose of the BNT162b1 vaccine [107], which, combined with the negative effect of alcohol on these cells, can have severe consequences for the immune system.
There is no data suggesting that other alcohol-associated chronic illnesses reduce the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines. Patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis demonstrated a 100% reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalization or death following the first dose of either the BNT162b2 or the mRNA-1273 vaccines [108].

8. Conclusions

To date, 24 COVID-19 vaccines have been approved by various institutions in different countries, with more than 100 vaccines undergoing clinical trials and more than 270 currently in pre-clinical development [109]. Besides the well-known adverse effects associated with antiviral vaccines, cases of severe pathologies and syndromes have been rarely observed among people who have received COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, The Lancet reported that 1.3% of the cases processed by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the USA were deaths [110]. Considering the risk of severe COVID-19 and the widespread distribution of vaccinations within a short time span, it can safely say that all these cases are insignificant compared to the benefits of vaccines. At the same time, the currently predominant Omicron strain variants have a reduced risk of severe disease, which, in turn, reduces the advantages of vaccination relative to the disadvantages. It was reported that the repeated use of vaccine boosters induced humoral and cellular tolerance against the Delta and Omicron variants [111]. There is no direct evidence in the literature indicating that moderate alcohol consumption has any effect on the health of vaccinated patients. However, there are several health conditions associated with alcohol abuse for which vaccination poses additional risks.
At present, the “spike effect” of vaccines and its amplification by alcohol exposure is of most interest. More research is needed to understand the full mechanism of the alcohol-enhanced “spike effect” and to develop appropriate countermeasures to block it. It should also be considered that the chronic and excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages leads to a weakening of the immune system and, as a result, a lower effectiveness of vaccination.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/pathogens12020163

References

  1. Messaoudi, I.; Pasala, S.; Grant, K. Could moderate alcohol intake be recommended to improve vaccine responses? Expert. Rev. Vaccines 2014, 13, 817–819.
  2. Sarkar, D.; Jung, M.K.; Wang, H.J. Alcohol and the Immune System. Alcohol Res. Curr. Rev. 2015, 37, 153–155.
  3. Alraiyes, A.H.; Shaheen, K.; Alraies, M.C. Alcoholic leukopenic pneumococcal sepsis. Avicenna J. Med. 2013, 3, 53–55.
  4. Trannesen, H.; Andersen, J.R.; Pedersen, A.E.; Kaiser, A.H. Lymphopenia in heavy drinkers--reversibility and relation to the duration of drinking episodes. Ann. Med. 1990, 22, 229–231.
  5. Gonzalez-Quintela, A.; Alende, R.; Gude, F.; Campos-Franco, J.; Rey, J.; Meijide, L.M.; Fernandez-Merino, C.; Vidal, C. Serum levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a general adult population and their relationship with alcohol consumption, smoking and common metabolic abnormalities. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2008, 151, 42–50.
  6. Mili, F.; Flanders, W.D.; Boring, J.R.; Annest, J.L.; DeStefano, F. The associations of alcohol drinking and drinking cessation to measures of the immune system in middle-aged men. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1992, 16, 688–694.
  7. Barr, T.; Helms, C.; Grant, K.; Messaoudi, I. Opposing effects of alcohol on the immune system. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 65, 242–251.
  8. Meadows, G.G.; Zhang, H. Effects of Alcohol on Tumor Growth, Metastasis, Immune Response, and Host Survival. Alcohol Res. Curr. Rev. 2015, 37, 311–322.
  9. Castaldelli-Maia, J.M.; Segura, L.E.; Martins, S.S. The concerning increasing trend of alcohol beverage sales in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Alcohol 2021, 96, 37–42.
  10. Nadkarni, A.; Kapoor, A.; Pathare, S. COVID-19 and forced alcohol abstinence in India: The dilemmas around ethics and rights. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2020, 71, 101579.
  11. Pedrosa, A.L.; Bitencourt, L.; Fróes, A.C.F.; Cazumbá, M.L.B.; Campos, R.G.B.; de Brito, S.B.C.S.; Simões e Silva, A.C. Emotional, Behavioral, and Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 566212.
  12. Anker, J.J.; Kushner, M.G. Co-Occurring Alcohol Use Disorder and Anxiety: Bridging Psychiatric, Psychological, and Neurobiological Perspectives. Alcohol Res. 2019, 40.
  13. Aghababaeian, H.; Hamdanieh, L.; Ostadtaghizadeh, A. Alcohol intake in an attempt to fight COVID-19: A medical myth in Iran. Alcohol 2020, 88, 29–32.
  14. Awijen, H.; Ben Zaied, Y.; Nguyen, D.K. Covid-19 vaccination, fear and anxiety: Evidence from Google search trends. Soc. Sci. Med. 2022, 297, 114820.
  15. Bendau, A.; Plag, J.; Petzold, M.B.; Ströhle, A. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and related fears and anxiety. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 97, 107724.
  16. Chen, S.; Aruldass, A.R.; Cardinal, R.N. Mental health outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the United States: A national cross-sectional study. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 298, 396–399.
  17. McNeil, A.; Purdon, C. Anxiety disorders, COVID-19 fear, and vaccine hesitancy. J. Anxiety Disord. 2022, 90, 102598.
  18. Wang, L.; Wang, Q.; Davis, P.B.; Volkow, N.D.; Xu, R. Increased risk for COVID-19 breakthrough infection in fully vaccinated patients with substance use disorders in the United States between December 2020 and August 2021. World Psychiatry 2022, 21, 124–132.
  19. Solopov, P.; Colunga Biancatelli, R.; Sharlow, E.; Lazo, J.; Catravas, J. Single intratracheal exposure to SARS-CoV-2 S1 spike protein induces acute lung injury in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice. FASEB J. 2021, 35.
  20. Solopov, P.A.; Biancatelli, R.M.L.C.; Catravas, J.D. Alcohol Increases Lung Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Expression and Exacerbates Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Spike Protein Subunit 1-Induced Acute Lung Injury in K18-hACE2 Transgenic Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2022, 192, 990–1000.
  21. Bautista, A.P. Free radicals, chemokines, and cell injury in HIV-1 and SIV infections and alcoholic hepatitis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 1527–1532.
  22. Daniluk, J.; Szuster-Ciesielska, A.; Drabko, J.; Kandefer-Szerszeń, M. Serum cytokine levels in alcohol-related liver cirrhosis. Alcohol 2001, 23, 29–34.
  23. González-Quintela, A.; Dominguez-Santalla, M.; Pérez, L.; Vidal, C.; Lojo, S.; Barrio, E. Influence of acute alcohol intake and alcohol withdrawal on circulating levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-12. Cytokine 2000, 12, 1437–1440.
  24. Zakhari, S. Overview: How is alcohol metabolized by the body? Alcohol Res. Health 2006, 29, 245–254.
  25. Yeligar, S.M.; Chen, M.M.; Kovacs, E.J.; Sisson, J.H.; Burnham, E.L.; Brown, L.A.S. Alcohol and lung injury and immunity. Alcohol 2016, 55, 51–59.
  26. Gentilello, L.M.; Cobean, R.A.; Walker, A.P.; Moore, E.E.; Wertz, M.J.; Dellinger, E.P. Acute ethanol intoxication increases the risk of infection following penetrating abdominal trauma. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1993, 34, 669–675.
  27. Wyatt, T.A.; Gentry-Nielsen, M.J.; Pavlik, J.A.; Sisson, J.H. Desensitization of PKA-stimulated ciliary beat frequency in an ethanol-fed rat model of cigarette smoke exposure. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2004, 28, 998–1004.
  28. Cohen, S.; Tyrrell, D.A.; Russell, M.A.; Jarvis, M.J.; Smith, A. Smoking, alcohol consumption, and susceptibility to the common cold. Am. J. Public Health 1993, 83, 1277–1283.
  29. Quesada-Molina, M.; Muñoz-Garach, A.; Tinahones, F.J.; Moreno-Indias, I. A New Perspective on the Health Benefits of Moderate Beer Consumption: Involvement of the Gut Microbiota. Metabolites 2019, 9, 272.
  30. Diaz, L.E.; Montero, A.; Gonzalez-Gross, M.; Vallejo, A.I.; Romeo, J.; Marcos, A. Influence of alcohol consumption on immunological status: A review. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 56, S50–S53.
  31. Magrone, T.; Candore, G.; Caruso, C.; Jirillo, E.; Covelli, V. Polyphenols from Red Wine Modulate Immune Responsiveness: Biological and Clinical Significance. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 2733–2748.
  32. Romeo, J.; Wärnberg, J.; Nova, E.; Díaz, L.E.; González-Gross, M.; Marcos, A. Changes in the immune system after moderate beer consumption. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 51, 359–366.
  33. Solopov, P.; Biancatelli, R.M.L.C.; Dimitropoulou, C.; Catravas, J.D. Dietary Phytoestrogens Ameliorate Hydrochloric Acid-Induced Chronic Lung Injury and Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3599.
  34. Romeo, J.; Wärnberg, J.; Nova, E.; Díaz, L.E.; Gómez-Martinez, S.; Marcos, A. Moderate alcohol consumption and the immune system: A review. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 98, S111–S115.
  35. Van de Loo, A.; Raasveld, S.; Hogewoning, A.; Zeeuw, R.; Bosma, E.; Bouwmeester, N.; Lukkes, M.; Knipping, K.; Mackus, M.; Kraneveld, A.; et al. Immune Responses after Heavy Alcohol Consumption: Cytokine Concentrations in Hangover-Sensitive and Hangover-Resistant Drinkers. Healthcare 2021, 9, 395.
  36. Mittal, A.; Manjunath, K.; Ranjan, R.K.; Kaushik, S.; Kumar, S.; Verma, V. COVID-19 pandemic: Insights into structure, function, and hACE2 receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008762.
  37. Almehdi, A.M.; Khoder, G.; Alchakee, A.S.; Alsayyid, A.T.; Sarg, N.H.; Soliman, S.S. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Pathogenesis, vaccines, and potential therapies. Infection 2021, 49, 855–876.
  38. Martínez-Flores, D.; Zepeda-Cervantes, J.; Cruz-Reséndiz, A.; Aguirre-Sampieri, S.; Sampieri, A.; Vaca, L. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Based on the Spike Glycoprotein and Implications of New Viral Variants. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 701501.
  39. Angeli, F.; Reboldi, G.; Trapasso, M.; Zappa, M.; Spanevello, A.; Verdecchia, P. COVID-19, vaccines and deficiency of ACE(2) and other angiotensinases. Closing the loop on the “Spike effect”. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 103, 23–28.
  40. Cognetti, J.S.; Miller, B.L. Monitoring Serum Spike Protein with Disposable Photonic Biosensors Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination. Sensors 2021, 21, 5857.
  41. Theoharides, T.C. Could SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Be Responsible for Long-COVID Syndrome? Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 59, 1850–1861.
  42. Kim, E.S.; Jeon, M.T.; Kim, K.S.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.G. Spike Proteins of SARS-CoV-2 Induce Pathological Changes in Molecular Delivery and Metabolic Function in the Brain Endothelial Cells. Viruses 2021, 13, 2021.
  43. Li, J.; Wang, P.; Yang, N.; Huang, J.; Ou, J.; Xu, T.; Zhao, X.; Liu, T.; Huang, X.; Wang, Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike promotes inflammation and apoptosis through autophagy by ROS-suppressed PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166260.
  44. Khan, S.; Shafiei, M.; Longoria, C.; Schoggins, J.; Savani, R.; Zaki, H. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway. Elife 2021, 10, e68563.
  45. Biancatelli, R.M.L.C.; Solopov, P.A.; Gregory, B.; Khodour, Y.; Catravas, J.D. HSP90 Inhibitors Modulate SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Subunit 1-Induced Human Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Activation and Barrier Dysfunction. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 812199.
  46. Biancatelli, R.M.C.; Solopov, P.A.; Sharlow, E.R.; Lazo, J.S.; Marik, P.E.; Catravas, J.D. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit S1 induces COVID-19-like acute lung injury in Κ18-hACE2 transgenic mice and barrier dysfunction in human endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2021, 321, L477–L484.
  47. Lei, Y.; Zhang, J.; Schiavon, C.R.; He, M.; Chen, L.; Shen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, Q.; Cho, Y.; Andrade, L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 1323–1326.
  48. Petruk, G.; Puthia, M.; Petrlova, J.; Samsudin, F.; Strömdahl, A.; Cerps, S.; Uller, L.; Kjellström, S.; Bond, P.; Schmidtchen, A. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and boosts proinflammatory activity. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 12, 916–932.
  49. Zhu, G.; Lyu, L.; Yang, H.; Liu, G.; Yang, S.; Gu, C.; Wang, L.; Yan, H.; Hu, M.; Che, C. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-induced host inflammatory response signature in human corneal epithelial cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021, 24, 584.
  50. Ryu, J.K.; Sozmen, E.G.; Dixit, K.; Montano, M.; Matsui, Y.; Liu, Y.E.; Helmy, T.J.; Deerinck, Z.; Yan, R.; Schuck, R.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces abnormal inflammatory blood clots neutralized by fibrin immunotherapy. bioRxiv 2021.
  51. Zheng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Guo, Z.; Sheng, J.; Ye, X.; Jin, G.; Wang, C.; Chai, W.; Yan, J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein causes blood coagulation and thrombosis by competitive binding to heparan sulfate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 1124–1129.
  52. Boschi, C.; Scheim, D.E.; Bancod, A.; Militello, M.; Le Bideau, M.; Colson, P.; Fantini, J.; La Scola, B. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Hemagglutination: Implications for COVID-19 Morbidities and Therapeutics and for Vaccine Adverse Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15480.
  53. Balasubramanian, N.; James, T.D.; Pushpavathi, S.G.; Marcinkiewcz, C.A. Repeated ethanol exposure and withdrawal alters ACE2 expression in discrete brain regions: Implications for SARS-CoV-2 infection. bioRxiv 2022.
  54. Wang, F.; Yang, J.L.; Yu, K.K.; Xu, M.; Xu, Y.Z.; Chen, L.; Lu, Y.-m.; Fang, H.-s.; Wang, X.-y.; Hu, Z.-q.; et al. Wang, Activation of the NF-κB pathway as a mechanism of alcohol enhanced progression and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 10.
  55. Vandenbulcke, M.; Janssens, J. Acute axonal polyneuropathy in chronic alcoholism and malnutrition. Acta Neurol. Belg. 1999, 99, 198–201.
  56. Worner, T.M. Guillain-Barré’s syndrome in alcoholics. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1989, 23, 93.
  57. Kim, S.Y.; Oh, D.J.; Park, B.; Choi, H.G. Bell’s palsy and obesity, alcohol consumption and smoking: A nested case-control study using a national health screening cohort. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4248.
  58. Hansson, M.; Nygren, P.A.K.; Ståhl, S. Design and production of recombinant subunit vaccines. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2000, 32, 95–107.
  59. Heidary, M.; Kaviar, V.H.; Shirani, M.; Ghanavati, R.; Motahar, M.; Sholeh, M.; Ghahramanpour, H.; Khoshnood, S. A Comprehensive Review of the Protein Subunit Vaccines Against COVID-19. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 927306.
  60. Heath, P.T.; Galiza, E.P.; Baxter, D.; Boffito, M.; Browne, D.; Burns, F.; Chadwick, D.; Clark, R.; Cosgrove, C.; Galloway, J.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 Vaccine at Completion of the Placebo-Controlled Phase of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin. Infect Dis. 2022, ciac803.
  61. Tian, J.H.; Patel, N.; Haupt, R.; Zhou, H.; Weston, S.; Hammond, H.; Logue, J.; Portnoff, A.; Norton, J.; Guebre-Xabier, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein vaccine candidate NVX-CoV2373 immunogenicity in baboons and protection in mice. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 372.
  62. Rydyznski Moderbacher, C.; Kim, C.; Mateus, J.; Plested, J.; Zhu, M.; Cloney-Clark, S.; Weiskopf, D.; Sette, A.; Fries, L.; Glenn, G.; et al. NVX-CoV2373 vaccination induces functional SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e160898.
  63. Oh, J.; Cho, W.H.; Barcelon, E.; Kim, K.H.; Hong, J.; Lee, S.J. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces cognitive deficit and anx-iety-like behavior in mouse via non-cell autonomous hippocampal neuronal death. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5496.
  64. Barrett, P.N.; Mundt, W.; Kistner, O.; Howard, M.K. Vero cell platform in vaccine production: Moving towards cell cul-ture-based viral vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2009, 8, 607–618.
  65. Sanders, B.P.; Koldijk, M.; Schuitemaker, H. Inactivated viral vaccines. In Vaccine Analysis: Strategies, Principles, and Control; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 45–80.
  66. Liang, Z.; Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Jing, B.; Li, Z.; Xia, X.; Sun, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Shi, L.; et al. Adjuvants for Coronavirus Vaccines. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 589833.
  67. Facciolà, A.; Visalli, G.; Laganà, A.; Di Pietro, A. An Overview of Vaccine Adjuvants: Current Evidence and Future Per-spectives. Vaccines 2022, 10, 819.
  68. Wang, C.; Chen, L.Y.; Lu, Q.B.; Cui, F. Vaccination with the Inactivated Vaccine (Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV) Ensures Pro-tection against SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease. Vaccines 2022, 10, 920.
  69. Gao, Q.; Bao, L.; Mao, H.; Wang, L.; Xu, K.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, N.; Lv, Z.; et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 2020, 369, 77–81.
  70. Zhang, Y.; Zeng, G.; Pan, H.; Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Chu, K.; Han, W.; Chen, Z.; Tang, R.; Yin, W.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 181–192.
  71. Ahi, M.; Farahani, R.H.; Basiri, P.; Rahjerdi, A.K.; Sheidaei, A.; Gohari, K.; Rahimi, Z.; Gholami, F.; Moradi, M.; Naeeni, F.G.; et al. Com-parison of the Safety and Immunogenicity of FAKHRAVAC and BBIBP-CorV Vaccines when Administrated as Booster Dose: A Parallel Two Arms, Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1800.
  72. Ai, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Xiang, H.; Guo, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Q.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases (CHESS-NMCID 2101): A Multicenter Study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 1516–1524.e2.
  73. Dal-Ré, R.; Launay, O. Public trust on regulatory decisions: The European Medicines Agency and the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine label. Vaccine 2021, 39, 4029–4031.
  74. Franchini, M.; Liumbruno, G.M.; Pezzo, M. COVID-19 vaccine-associated immune thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT): Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for a new syndrome. Eur. J. Haematol. 2021, 107, 173–180.
  75. Kelton, J.G.; Arnold, D.M.; Nazy, I. Lessons from vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 753–755.
  76. Gordon, S.F.; Clothier, H.J.; Morgan, H.; Buttery, J.P.; Phuong, L.K.; Monagle, P.; Chunilal, S.; Wood, E.M.; Tran, H.; Szer, J.; et al. Immune thrombocytopenia following immunisation with Vaxzevria ChadOx1-S (AstraZeneca) vaccine, Victoria, Australia. Vaccine 2021, 39, 7052–7057.
  77. Shen, C.J.; Kao, C.H.; Hsu, T.Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Lin, C.L.; Shih, H.M. Effect of alcohol intoxication on the risk of venous thromboembolism: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. Medicine 2017, 96, e8041.
  78. Aggarwal, A.; Puri, K.; Liangpunsakul, S. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in cirrhotic patients: Systematic review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5737–5745.
  79. Pahor, M.; Guralnik, J.M.; Havlik, R.J.; Carbonin, P.; Salive, M.E.; Ferrucci, L.; Corti, M.-C.; Hennekens, C.H. Alcohol Con-sumption and Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Older Persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1996, 44, 1030–1037.
  80. Kasuda, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Shima, M.; Morimura, Y.; Kudo, R.; Hatake, K.; Yoshioka, A. Ethanol inhibits microaggregate for-mation of platelets in human whole blood. HAEMA 2004, 7, 200–204.
  81. Abolmaali, M.; Rezania, F.; Behnagh, A.; Hamidabad, N.; Gorji, A.; Mirzaasgari, Z. Guillain-Barré syndrome in asso-ciation with COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review. Immunol. Res. 2022, 70, 752–764.
  82. Shay, D.K.; Gee, J.; Su, J.; Myers, T.; Marquez, P.; Liu, R.; Zhang, B.; Licata, C.; Clark, T.; Shimabukuro, T. Safety Monitoring of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, March-April 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 680–684.
  83. Idiculla, P.S.; Gurala, D.; Palanisamy, M.; Vijayakumar, R.; Dhandapani, S.; Nagarajan, E. Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Review. Eur. Neurol. 2020, 83, 369–379.
  84. MacNeil, J.R.; Su, J.R.; Broder, K.R.; Guh, A.Y.; Gargano, J.W.; Wallace, M.; Hadler, S.C.; Scobie, H.M.; Blain, A.E.; Moulia, D.; et al. Updated Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Among Vaccine Recipients—United States, April 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 651–656.
  85. Oliver, S.E.; Wallace, M.; See, I.; Mbaeyi, S.; Godfrey, M.; Hadler, S.; Jatlaoui, T.; Twentyman, E.; Hughes, M.; Rao, A.; et al. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Rec-ommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, December 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 90–95.
  86. Logunov, D.Y.; Dolzhikova, I.V.; Zubkova, O.V.; Tukhvatullin, A.I.; Shcheblyakov, D.V.; Dzharullaeva, A.S.; Grousova, D.M.; Erokhova, A.S.; Kovyrshina, A.V.; Botikov, A.G.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations: Two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies from Russia. Lancet 2020, 396, 887–897.
  87. Cazzola, M.; Rogliani, P.; Mazzeo, F.; Matera, M.G. Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine. Respir. Med. 2021, 187, 106569.
  88. Moore, J.P. Approaches for Optimal Use of Different COVID-19 Vaccines: Issues of Viral Variants and Vaccine Efficacy. JAMA 2021, 325, 1251–1252.
  89. Perreau, M.; Pantaleo, G.; Kremer, E.J. Activation of a dendritic cell-T cell axis by Ad5 immune complexes creates an im-proved environment for replication of HIV in T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 2717–2725.
  90. Tumban, E. Lead SARS-CoV-2 Candidate Vaccines: Expectations from Phase III Trials and Recommendations Post-Vaccine Approval. Viruses 2020, 13, 54.
  91. Heinz, R.; Waltenbaugh, C. Ethanol Consumption Modifies Dendritic Cell Antigen Presentation in Mice. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2007, 31, 1759–1771.
  92. Thompson, M.G.; Navarro, F.; Chitsike, L.; Ramirez, L.; Kovacs, E.J.; Watkins, S.K. Alcohol exposure differentially effects anti-tumor immunity in females by altering dendritic cell function. Alcohol 2016, 57, 1–8.
  93. Polina Nikolskaya, A.O.; Reuters. Don’t Mix Sputnik Vaccine with Alcohol, Says Russian Official. Some Recoil. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-russia-vaccine-alcoho-idUSKBN28J239 (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  94. Wolff, J.A.; Malone, R.W.; Williams, P.; Chong, W.; Acsadi, G.; Jani, A.; Felgner, P.L. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science 1990, 247, 1465–1468.
  95. Chaudhary, N.; Weissman, D.; Whitehead, K.A. mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: Principles, delivery and clinical translation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 817–838.
  96. Park, J.W.; Lagniton, P.N.; Liu, Y.; Xu, R.-H. mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: What, why and how. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 1446–1460.
  97. Chirumbolo, S. Vaccination hesitancy and the “myth” on mRNA-based vaccines in Italy in the COVID-19 era: Does urgency meet major safety criteria? J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 4049–4053.
  98. Trougakos, I.P.; Terpos, E.; Alexopoulos, H.; Politou, M.; Paraskevis, D.; Scorilas, A.; Kastritis, E.; Andreakos, E.; Dimopoulos, M.A. Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: The spike hypothesis. Trends Mol. Med. 2022, 28, 542–554.
  99. Ndeupen, S.; Qin, Z.; Jacobsen, S.; Bouteau, A.; Estanbouli, H.; Igyártó, B.Z. The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory. iScience 2021, 24, 103479.
  100. Yamamoto, S.; Tanaka, A.; Ohmagari, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Ishitsuka, K.; Morisaki, N.; Kojima, M.; Nishikimi, A.; Tokuda, H.; Inoue, M.; et al. Use of heated tobacco products, moderate alcohol drinking, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers after BNT162b2 vaccination among Japanese healthcare workers. Prev. Med. 2022, 161, 107123.
  101. Bozkurt, B.; Kamat, I.; Hotez, P.J. Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Circulation 2021, 144, 471–484.
  102. Patone, M.; Mei, X.W.; Handunnetthi, L.; Dixon, S.; Zaccardi, F.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Watkinson, P.; Khunti, K.; Harnden, A.; Coupland, C.; et al. Risk of Myocarditis After Sequential Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Age and Sex. Circulation 2022, 146, 743–754.
  103. Mirijello, A.; Tarli, C.; Vassallo, G.A.; Sestito, L.; Antonelli, M.; D’Angelo, C.; Ferrulli, A.; De Cosmo, S.; Gasbarrini, A.; Addolorato, G. Alcoholic cardiomyopathy: What is known and what is not known. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2017, 43, 1–5.
  104. Wilke, A.; Kaiser, A.; Ferency, I.; Maisch, B. Alcohol and myocarditis. Herz 1996, 21, 248–257.
  105. George, A.; Figueredo, V.M. Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy: A Review. J. Card. Fail. 2011, 17, 844–849.
  106. Awaya, T.; Moroi, M.; Nakamura, F.; Toi, S.; Wakiya, M.; Enomoto, Y.; Kunimasa, T.; Nakamura, M. A Possibility of Vaso-spastic Angina after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1998.
  107. Mulligan, M.J.; Lyke, K.E.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Neuzil, K.; Raabe, V.; Bailey, R.; Swanson, K.A.; et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature 2020, 586, 589–593.
  108. John, B.V.; Deng, Y.; Scheinberg, A.; Mahmud, N.; Taddei, T.H.; Kaplan, D.; Labrada, M.; Baracco, G.; Dahman, B. Association of BNT162b2 mRNA and mRNA-1273 Vaccines With COVID-19 Infection and Hospitalization Among Patients With Cirrhosis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181, 1306–1314.
  109. COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker. 18 August 2022. Available online: https://www.covid-19vaccinetracker.org/#Top-of-Page (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  110. Rosenblum, H.G.; Gee, J.; Liu, R.; Marquez, P.L.; Zhang, B.; Strid, P.; Abara, W.E.; McNeil, M.M.; Myers, T.R.; Hause, A.M.; et al. Safety of mRNA vaccines administered during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme: An observational study of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and v-safe. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 802–812.
  111. Gao, F.X.; Wu, R.X.; Shen, M.Y.; Huang, J.J.; Li, T.T.; Hu, C.; Luo, F.; Song, S.; Mu, S.; Hao, Y.; et al. Extended SARS-CoV-2 RBD booster vaccination induces humoral and cellular immune tolerance in mice. iScience 2022, 25, 105479.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback