Dynamic-Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The dynamic-maturational model of attachment and adaptation (DMM) is a transdisciplinary model describing the effect attachment relationships can have on human development and functioning. It is especially focused on the effects of relationships between children and parents and between romantic/reproductive couples. It developed initially from attachment theory as developed by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, and incorporated many other theories into a comprehensive model of adaptation to life's many dangers. The DMM was initially created by developmental psychologist Patricia McKinsey Crittenden and her colleagues including David DiLalla, Angelika Claussen, Andrea Landini, Steve Farnfield, and Susan Spieker. A main tenant of the DMM is that exposure to danger drives neural development and adaptation to promote survival. Danger includes relationship danger. In DMM-attachment theory, when a person needs protection or comfort from danger from a person with whom they have a protective relationship, the nature of the relationship generates relation-specific self-protective strategies. These are patterns of behavior which include the underlying neural processing. The DMM protective strategies describe aspects of the parent-child relationship, romantic relationships, and to a degree, relationships between patients/clients and long-term helping professionals.

  • neural development
  • human development
  • attachment theory

1. History

Out of the development of attachment theory, British psychiatrist John Bowlby coalesced a coherent theory and is generally credited with creating the foundation for modern attachment theory.[1] Mary Ainsworth, an American psychologist started working with Bowlby in 1950.[1] Ainsworth completed her doctoral thesis in 1940 under William Blatz, who had developed security theory, a precursor to attachment theory.[1] Blatz believed the core nature of the relationship between a (to use his colloquial terms) mother and child involved the development of a trusted and secure relationship to function as a safe base for a child's need to explore. This set an initial foundation for the developing theory of attachment as involving a two-pattern model, security vs insecurity, centered on safety and play.

However, throughout the 1950s, both Ainsworth and Bowlby began developing a three-pattern model centered on danger and survival.[1] In the 1960s, Ainsworth developed the first scientific method to assess attachment, called the strange situation. The results of her assessments confirmed a three-pattern model. Staying with a secure vs insecure framework, Ainsworth identified one secure pattern and two completely different insecure patterns. She labeled these with the letters A, B, C, with B representing the secure pattern.

Ainsworth's graduate students, including Mary Main and Patricia "Pat" Crittenden, made important developments to attachment science and theory. Both Main and Crittenden realized that the criteria Ainsworth was using did not allow for the attachment classification of a significant number of children.[2] Main initially described most of this group as being disorganized, unable to organize an attachment strategy to help them meet their attachment system needs for safety.[3] Main and Solomon later redefined disorganized attachment.[3] Decades of research were dedicated to exploring the concept of disorganized attachment, but ultimately the concept proved almost completely unhelpful.[4]

Crittenden studied under Ainsworth in the 1980s, ten years after Main. Because Crittenden initially focused on danger and saw the attachment system as promoting survival, she rejected the idea that a significant portion of children could fail to organize an attachment strategy to survive.[5][6] Thus, she looked for other explanations about the apparent shortcomings in Ainsworth's initial model.[7] As she did, she expanded the A, B, C patterns of attachment, and with the help of Andrea Landini they organized the patterns into what eventually became the DMM.[8][9]

She also started her work after John Bowlby wrote the third book in his Attachment and Loss trilogy in 1980, Loss: Sadness and Depression.[10] In Chapter 4 of that book, Bowlby outlined his view that attachment was intimately connected with information processing and the defensive exclusion of information to survive psychological danger. He argued that common psychological defense mechanisms were actually efforts to keep certain types of unwanted information out of one's mind during experiences and while considering issues and making decisions. Crittenden centered her work on how humans develop self-protective strategies and patterns of information processing in the context of danger.[7]

In a sense, Crittenden began where Bowlby and Ainsworth left off. While moving away from some of the older concepts such as secure vs insecure and internal working models, she kept and refined the three-pattern model.

2. DMM-Attachment

2.1. Basic Definition of DMM-Attachment

Attachment describes a system which involves a person's need to be protected from danger, and comforted especially after exposure to danger and a relationship with an attachment figure who can provide protection from danger and comfort. As a system centered on survival, it also involves a person's need to increase reproductive opportunities and protect progeny.[11][12][13]

Particularly when the attachment system involves a caregiver and child, the relational interactions related to attachment needs shapes neural development and emotional and biological regulation processes in children, which has lifelong impacts.[14][15]

An attachment figure may be one or both parents or other close caregiver, and a romantic partner, and has the qualities of an affectively charged relationship, providing assistance in regulating emotions, and protecting the person from being forced to handle something outside their developmental ability (Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)).[14]

Teachers, helping professionals, probation officers, and other people may function as an auxiliary attachment figure, or transitional attachment figure (TAF), to help get through a difficult experience.[9][14][15][16][17]

Danger can be objective (deep water, cliff edges, snakes) or subjective and relevant to only particular attachment patterns. For people who tend to use self-protective A-strategies, danger can include aggressive or dismissive parental responses, not doing the right thing, doing the wrong thing, expressing feelings especially if negative, relying on others to meet needs, and being in conflict. For people who tend to use self-protective C-strategies, danger can include an inconsistent or lack of parental response, not expressing and satisfying feelings especially if negative, following someone else's rules which don't satisfy feelings, compromising, relying on the self to meet needs, and not being in conflict or a struggle.[13][18]

2.2. DMM Contributions to the Development of Attachment Theory

Crittenden and colleagues have advanced attachment knowledge in numerous ways. Crittenden and Landini describe many of these in their 2011 book Assessing adult attachment: A dynamic-maturational approach to discourse analysis.

Focus on danger. The DMM focus on danger, rather than safety, orients an understanding of the attachment system in a way that is practical and useful for understanding response to threat and conflict .

Development of lifespan attachment assessments. Crittenden and colleagues developed a comprehensive lifespan set of attachment assessments (described below), and enhanced existing assessments. Since theory leads scientific inquiry, and scientific findings add to theory, DMM assessments contributed to more detailed theory.

Maturational and changeable. DMM-attachment recognizes that humans are able to utilize more and more sophisticated self-protective attachment strategies as they age. Hence, attachment patterns can become increasingly complex with age. Infants begin with instinctive strategies such as smiling and reaching, and through behavioral learning develop an increasing array of ways to gain protection from danger from their caregivers. Thought and communication patterns are eventually added to a person's available strategies. People can change their primary strategy, add additional strategies, and reorganize from and A-C strategy to a B strategy.

Strategies. Strategies are the ways people get their needs met. Self-protective strategies are not diagnoses or mental health disorders. The strategies may be quite functional in certain types of relationships, and dysfunctional in other relationships if not adjusted. Selecting a specific response in a specific situation is not necessarily dictated by a strategy preference, it is situation and context driven, which Crittenden describes as a dispositional representation (DR). Crittenden expanded and more finely defined attachment strategies (or patterns), as noted below.

Detailed strategies. The DMM has identified new attachment behaviors, and described known behaviors with more specificity.

False positive affect (FPA) describes the use of inappropriate positive affect when negative affect would be more appropriate. An example is overbright smiling or laughing in the context of present danger or while experiencing pain. Victoria Climbié is considered a good case example.[14][19] At age eight she was murdered by caregiver abuse and neglect. Her physical scars and other signs of abuse were seen by multiple professionals and agencies, including doctors, nurses, social workers, and clergy, who all failed to recognize the extreme danger she was in. At the same time, she was described by a number of people as happy, friendly, "twirling up and down the ward", "had the most beautiful smile that lit up the room", and "you could beat her and she wouldn’t cry... she could take the beatings and pain like anything."[20] In the ABC+D model, this behavior is theorized as a marker of disorganized attachment.[21]

Shame is identified by Adult Attachment Interviews (below) conducted with the DMM method as a particularly sensitive emotion in A-patterns. Shame is defined as having an intrapersonal quality involving the fear of failing to meet an external standard, often too high a standard, set by others, along with self-blame and over-attribution of responsibility.[13]

Adaptive and strategic function of behavior. Attachment behaviors and communication styles are developed through adaptation to danger and function to promote survival in a given relationship.

Every DMM-attachment pattern involves both adaptive and maladaptive behaviors. A person using B3 "balanced" strategies may fail to predict danger or access a self-protective strategy and end up being harmed. A person using A-strategies may focus on cooperating and avoiding conflict to the exclusion of protecting their children or financial interests. A person using C-strategies may focus on satisfying their own feelings to the exclusion of cooperation and conflict resolution.

Individual behaviors can be seen in all attachment strategies, but serve different functions. For example, bright smiling can serve several self-protective purposes. In A-strategies it can function to hide pain and take attention away from in-the-moment negative experiences. In C-strategies it can function to disarm prior or following aggression.

Dimensional. Strategies are described as dimensional rather than categorical. As demonstrated on the DMM Circumplex, they range from exposing people to more and more risk (moving down the outside of the Circumplex), and more or more intensity (moving from the center of the Circumplex to the outer rim). The DMM eschews the terms secure and insecure, although it is used in various DMM literature.

2.3. DMM Foundations and Support

The DMM has and continues to incorporate all relevant disciplines. It incorporates all the disciplines Bowlby utilized, including psychoanalytic, ethology, general systems theory, evolutionary biology, cognitive information processing, and cognitive neurosciences. It incorporates all the disciplines Ainsworth utilized, including naturalistic observation, and empirical grounding of attachment theory. DMM additions include genetics, epigenetics, neurobiology, sociology, developmental psychology, Piaget's cognitive development, Eriksonian development, behavioral learning theory, social learning theory, theory of mind, cognitive psychology, Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development, Vygotsky and Bronfenbrenner's social ecology, transactional theory, family systems theory, polyvagal theory, mindfulness theory, and Functional Somatic Symptom theory.[13][15][22]

The DMM is supported by the International Association for the Study of Attachment (IASA). The Family Relations Institute (FRI) is the primary organization teaching DMM theory and assessments. The Attachment Studies programme at University of Roehampton, U.K., includes the DMM and some of its assessments, as does the Barnard Center for Infant Mental Health and Development at the University of Washington in Seattle.

IASA maintains a list of publications describing the DMM. There are over 500 such publications.

3. DMM Attachment Patterns

DMM attachment patterns can viewed several different ways.

In its simplest form, the DMM offers a 3-part model using the Ainsworth's basic A, B, C patterns.[23]

Some populations of clients tend to be heavily oriented to either a cognitive or affective information processing pattern, such as clinical populations.[24] In these contexts, the DMM offers a basic 2-part model.

The DMM Circumplex graphically depicts 22 adult patterns.[9][25] There are some sub-patterns, such as A3- (compulsive attending) and A4- (compulsive performance), and A and C patterns can be combined, such as A4/C5-6 or A3-4/C2.[13] In the table below, the cognitive A and affective C patterns are arranged from lowest (least at risk) to highest (most at risk).[9][13] The B1-2 patterns are somewhat cognitively organized, the B4-5 patterns are somewhat affectively organized.[13]

DMM self-protective strategies
Strategy DMM Strategy label Strategy DMM strategy label
A1 Inhibited/idealizing A2 Socially facile/distancing (distal)
A3 Compulsive caregiving A4 Compulsive compliance
A5 Compulsive promiscuity (social or sexual) A6 Compulsive self-reliance (social or isolated)
A7 Delusional idealizing A8 Externally assembled self (no self)
B1 Distanced from the past B2 Accepting
B3 Comfortably balanced (A and C strategies functionally balanced)
B4 Sentimental B5 Complaining acceptance
C1 Threateningly angry C2 Disarmingly desirous of comfort
C3 Aggressively angry C4 Feigned helpless
C5 Punitively angry and obsessed with revenge C6 Seductive and obsessed with rescue
C7 Menacing C8 Paranoid
AC or A/C Uncomfortably balanced, blended AC patterns or alternating A/C (dysfunctionally balanced)

Attachment strategy presentation can be impacted by a variety of factors, such as unresolved trauma, unresolved loss, depression, and triangulation.[13]

4. Information Processing and Transformation

The DMM is fundamentally an information processing model,[26] and self-protective attachment strategies develop around two primary sources of information available to humans: cognitive and affective.[13]

Cognitive information is described as temporally sequenced, as illustrated with "if/then" statements. Affective information is described as being emotionally intense experiences. Attachment A-strategies tend to emphasize cognitive information and de-emphasize or exclude affective information. Attachment C-strategies do the opposite, emphasizing affective information and de-emphasizing or excluding cognitive information. Attachment B-strategies tend to blend both types of information as they process experiences in the world, although they can emphasize one or the other.[13]

Crittenden describes information processing as involving four main steps:

  1. Perceive the information, or not;
  2. Interpret the information in some way, or not;
  3. Select response of some sort, or not; and
  4. Implement behavior of some sort, or not.[27]

An example to illustrate involves a child who is feeling a strong emotion. Will the parent 1) perceive their child's emotion? If so, will they 2) interpret it as the child needing help to process the emotion, or as the child being weak, overly-needy, or interrupting what they are doing? Will the parent 3) consider selecting a response, and if so which one? Will the parent 4) implement a response, or get distracted or decide to ignore their child's emotional experience?

4.1. Transformation of Information

At each stage of information processing, information is transformed as it is converted from what it is, to a representation of what it is in the mind. A test result, a smile, and divorce papers, come to mean something in the mind through a neural process. The DMM[13] currently identifies seven ways information can be transformed, each of which represents increased transformation:

True, erroneous, distorted, omitted, falsified, denied, delusional

A parent's processing of information about a child's strong negative emotion, continuing with that example, could be seen as:

  1. True, and provide information which helps the parent ease the child's distress.
  2. Erroneous, over or under-interpreted, such that a parental response might be non-productive, such as giving too much or not enough attention to the distress.
  3. Distorted, where some portion of the information is emphasized and the other de-emphasized, such as acknowledging the distress but emphasizing that it will go away on its own when it won't easily do so.
  4. Omitted, so that some portion of the information is discarded, such as the reason for the distress.
  5. Falsified, where the emotion is changed from one thing to another, such as distressed to hungry.
  6. Denied, where the emotion is actively avoided.
  7. Delusional, where new and incorrect information is created to replace the true information, such as thinking the child is laughing or is signaling a desire to play.

4.2. Memory Systems

DMM assessments look for memory system function as described by memory researchers such as Endel Tulving and Daniel Schacter. Eight memory systems assessed by the DMM method are body talk, somatic, procedural, semantic, imaged, connotative, episodic, and reflective integration.[9][13][28]

5. DMM Attachment Assessments

Attachment measures, or assessments, assess the self-protective strategy of a person. In infancy and early childhood, it is assessed with respect to specific attachment figures whereas beginning in the school years a generalized strategy is assessed. Assessments generally use a video-recorded interaction or an audio-recorded interview. In observed assessments behavior is assessed, and with interviews the discourse, or manner of speech, is primarily assessed. Crittenden and others have modified existing attachment assessments and developed others to create a range of DMM assessments intended to cover the lifespan.[29][30] Assessments generally assess individuals, caregivers (usually parents) and/or children, and can assess non-primary caregivers such as close grandparents and foster parents. DMM assessments can be used for research, clinically, forensically, and personally.[9][31][32]

Some DMM assessments are considered valid and reliable, and others are still in a development and validation phase which generally takes at least 10 years. IASA considers an assessment valid and reliable if it has a minimum of five published studies supporting it, including studies that the author of the assessment did not author, and that address several of the following:

  • Concurrent validity
  • Longitudinal validity
  • Face validity
  • Predictive validity
  • Clinical utility.

IASA's Family Court Protocol requires that assessments in a development phase should not be used forensically, particularly in court cases where children and parents could lose access to each other. IASA also argues that individual assessments are only reliable if the assessor (coder) is qualified by having passed a standardized reliability test and maintained their qualification.

5.1. Infant Care-Index (ICI)

The ICI consists of a 3-minute interaction of a caregiver and child (a 2-person, or dyadic, relationship) aged from birth to 15 months.[33] The ICI assesses interaction, not attachment (which does not develop until 9–11 months of age).  The ICI assesses a dyad's interpersonal functioning under non-threatening play conditions and clusters dyads as  sensitive to good enough, at mild risk of parenting difficulties, or at high risk of parenting difficulties, including infant neglect and maltreatment. It was developed by Crittenden with input from Ainsworth and Bowlby.[34][35] The ICI is considered a valid and reliable assessment and has more than 60 published studies.[33][36][37]

5.2. Strange Situation Procedure (SSP)

The SSP is the classic assessment of attachment developed by Ainsworth. Almost all other assessments of attachment are validated against it. The SSP consists of eight episodes over 21–23 minutes. Unlike the ICI which assesses only dyadic synchrony under the favorable condition of play, the SSP uses threat to elicit the infant's pattern of attachment. Threat, or relationship danger, comes in several forms such as the stranger coming into the observation room with parent and child (episode 3), the parent leaving the child in the room with the stranger (episode 4), the parent later leaving the child in the room alone (episode 6), and the stranger re-entering the room without the parent (episode 7). The parent returns and the stranger leaves in the eighth and final episode. The infant's behavior on the parent's return is the primary basis for classification into one of three major strategies, labeled A, B, and C.

The SSP was developed for 11-month-old infants. It has been used for older infants, but, as infants age, their tolerance for separation increases and the behavioral markers defined by Ainsworth fit less well, resulting in higher proportions of infants classified as secure, including maltreated infants.[38] In the DMM, this problem was resolved by limiting the age range to 11–15 months,[39] and developing, with Ainsworth's assistance, an alternating A/C classification and pre-compulsive and pre-coercive patterns.[40][41] These include A1-2 or C1-2 patterns, and clear evidence for A+ or C+ patterns (which involves more intense use of self-protective strategies). These expansions of the Ainsworth categories have been associated with maltreated infants and infants of depressed mothers.[42]

5.3. Preschool Assessment of Attachment (PAA)

The PAA is a version of Mary Ainsworth's Strange Situation Procedure (SSP), adapted to 2-5-year-old children. It assesses the child's self-protective strategies used with the adult involved in the assessment.[43] It also uses a video recorded 8-segment process over a structured 21-23 minute adult-child interaction. The PAA is valid and reliable, with more than 30 studies using it.[44][45]

5.4. School-Age Assessment of Attachment (SAA)

The SAA involves an audio recorded interview which is transcribed and analyzed with discourse analysis techniques, for children aged 6–13 years. In the assessment, a child is given story cards which represent increasing levels of danger, and they are asked to make up a story that describes what is depicted on the card, and then, if they had any similar experience in their life, asked a series of exploratory questions. It assesses the child's generalized attachment pattern, self-protective strategies, pattern of information processing, and possible unresolved trauma and loss. It was initially developed in 1997 by Crittenden, has been tested in eight research studies, and is considered to provide discriminate validity.[24][46] The SAA was the subject of a special section of Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry, Volume 22 Issue 3, July 2017.

5.5 Adult Attachment Interview (AAI)

The AAI is considered one of the most comprehensive attachment assessments, and is well validated. It was initially created by Nancy George and Carol Kaplan in, and later developed with Mary Main in 1985.[47] Crittenden and Landini slightly modified it with DMM theory in 2011.[13][48] It assesses self-protective attachment strategies, patterns of information processing, a possible unresolved trauma and loss which distort behavior and information processing, an over-riding condition which causes information distortion such as depression and triangulation in childhood, memory system usage, and reflective function. The assessment involves asking a person a series of structured questions, transcribing the audio recording, and applying a complex set of discourse analysis techniques. The interview takes 60–90 minutes, and it can take hours or days to analyze. Learning to code reliably generally takes several years.[32]

Assessing adult attachment: A dynamic-maturational approach to discourse analysis (2011) is the coding manual for the DMM-AAI, and is publicly available.

5.6. DMM Assessments Undergoing the Validation Process

The following assessments have not been validated and are not considered by IASA to be acceptable for use forensically.

Toddler Care-Index (TCI)

The TCI video records a 5-minute interaction of a caregiver and child aged from 15 to 72 months. It assesses the general attachment characteristics of a specific dyad, such as mother and child or father and chid. The TCI is considered a useful assessment, but has not been validated by research. It was developed by Crittenden.[49]

Transition to Adulthood Attachment Interview (TAAI)

The TAAI is a modified version of the AAI for adolescents aged about 14–25 years old. It was modified from the AAI by Crittenden in 2005 and 2020.[50][51]

Meaning of the Child interview (MotC)

The MotC is an interview of a parent which is transcribed and assessed with discourse analysis techniques similar to the AAI. The MotC assesses a parent's general pattern of caregiving, sensitivity and level of responsiveness to their child, the degree and forms of control a parent may utilize, and self-reflective function (mentalization). It examines how caregiving is shaped by a parent's pattern of attachment and need for self protection. In a validation study, the way parents talked about their children in the MotC was found to predict how they behaved with their child in a CARE-Index video.[52] The MotC has also been used to research the parent-child relationships of parent of autistic children.[53] It was developed by Ben Grey and Steve Farnfield in 2011, and uses DMM theory and methods.[54]

Child Attachment and Play Assessment (CAPA)

The CAPA assesses the attachment and exploration systems of children aged 7–11. It uses an interview process similar to the SAA. The CAPA currently has one published validation study demonstrating convergence with other attachment procedures. It was developed by Steve Farnfield, and uses DMM theory and methods.[55]

6. Applications

6.1. Law

The DMM and its methods are useful for discourse and argument analysis, client counseling, forensic purposes, criminal justice, probation, and conflict management. At its heart, attachment theory involves the conflict of contradictory information and needs, and information processing involves a conflict between the emphasis and de-emphasis of information.[10][16]

Because information processing involves the defensive exclusion and inclusion of information, it can affect how people make decisions and communicate. The DMM-AAI discourse analysis method is specifically designed to "understand the meanings behind unclear communication * * * distorted communication and dysfunctional behavior."[13] (Crittenden and Landini, p. 1, 2011.)

Attachment assessments can be used in court cases[56] and forensically if done by a trained and reliable coder.[9][57][58] The IASA Family Court Protocol is designed to promote attachment information in a way that is as comprehensive and reliable as attachment assessments can allow, and which also supplements other information about individuals, family members, and family systems. FRI's Family Functional Formula is a comprehensive and valuable, if expensive, method to assess a family system.[59]

DMM perspectives on attachment and information processing are useful for understanding neglectful and harmful parenting,[6][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] domestic violence[71][72][73][74][75] and criminal behavior.[73][76][77][78][79][80]

6.2. Medicine – Somatic Symptoms

Kozlowska[15] argues that functional somatic symptoms are impacted by disrupted or chronically challenged attachment relationships. The DMM assessment method, especially for children, specifically identifies and assesses nonverbal communications and somatic expressions. Two large studies, which Kozlowska relied on, found a strong association between low quality attachment relationships and functional somatic symptoms later in life.[81][82] Kozlowska's own research showed children with functional neurological disorders (FND) almost universally had higher attachment strategies (A3-4, A5-6, C3-4, and C5-6).[83][84]

6.3. Psychotherapy

The DMM is not a therapy model, rather it provides a framework to better understand clients, improve communication, and can assist with selecting appropriate therapy models.[32][85] It can help therapists:

  • Assess or formulate the client's self-protective attachment strategies;
  • Focus the therapeutic alliance around the concept of being a transitional attachment figure;
  • Identify dangers from the past and in the present;
  • Determine how the client functions interpersonally (including with the therapist);
  • Identify a client's patterns of information processing and information bias;
  • Help clients build a coherent narrative of their experiences.[32][86][87][88]

For therapists using a family systems approach, it can help identify self-protective strategies between the parents, between each child and parent, and between children, to provide more insight into the functioning of the family system.[89][90] It can help therapists avoid blame and reframe negative emotions to honesty and more appropriate contexts. It can help a therapist move a client's strong negative emotions such as anger and a desire for revenge to softer and more manageable emotions such as sadness and vulnerability.[91] The DMM has been used in a public service context.[92][93] The DMM provides insight into various mental health issues,[94] such as working with emotions,[95][96] adolescent challenges,[97] trauma and neurobiological impacts,[98][99][100][101][102] PTSD,[103][104][105] ADHD,[106][107][108] autism,[109][110][111][112][113] borderline personality disorder,[114][115] avoidant personality disorder,[116] eating disorders,[117][118][119][120] conversion disorders,[15][121][122][123][124] somatic/factitious/fabricated illnesses,[15][125][126][127][128] psychopathy,[129] child abuse,[130] sex abuse,[131][132] effects of institutionalization,[133][134] and depression.[135][136][137][138]

6.4. Research

The DMM theory and assessment methods are useful for conducting attachment assessments. Because there are DMM assessments to cover the lifespan,[30] they can be used to assess a family system.[90] The DMM approach appears to provide more precise results with populations of people whose childhood involved adverse childhood experiences or parents who consistently used cold, inconsistent, harsh or controlling parenting techniques or engaged in parental conflict or failed to protect or comfort their children.[24] It appears that between the DMM and Berkeley assessment methods, the DMM method can better delineate between secure and insecure attachment classifications, and also the quantity of A, C, and mixed AC patterns.[48] This is likely because the DMM is focused on a person's response to danger and fear, and describes the attachment system's primary purpose as being to organize self-protective responses.[5][48]

7. Comparison to Other Attachment Models

Ainsworth developed the ABC model in the 1960s and 1970s. It was the foundation for the ABC+D (sometimes called Berkeley) model[42] and the DMM.[139]

The newer ABC+D and DMM models both describe the attachment system, use Ainsworth's basic ABC patterns, and use the SSP and AAI attachment assessments. Ainsworth's ABC model ultimately described 9 subcategories, A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, C1, and C2. The newer models went on to identify additional basic subcategories, 24 in the adult version of the ABC+D model and 29 in the DMM, and each describe additional AC combinations.[48]

While they both describe the effect of the attachment system on information processing and memory function, and both describe the impacts of trauma and loss, the DMM provides more focus and detail on these elements. The DMM utilizes more memory systems and considers more types of trauma. In the ABC+D model meaning is assigned to behavior, whereas the DMM looks for the function of behavior to define its meaning.[5][48]

The ABC+D model has historically focused on safety, attachment security vs insecurity, is categorical, describes linear developmental trajectories, describes attachment with different concepts and terms for children and adults, and uses Bowlby's "internal working model" concept. The DMM is focused on danger, focuses on risk instead of security-insecurity, is dimensional, describes potentially branching developmental pathways, describes the maturational development of self-protective strategies, and describes neurobiological systems and processes.[5][13]

Landa and Duschinsky offer a theory about the historical development of both models to provide an explanation about why and how they differ.[5][7] The ABC+D model initially relied on normative (average) research populations. Initial DMM research utilized both normative and maltreated populations, so it had a richer data set to work from.[2][140][141] Each model also makes different foundational assumptions. The DMM (and others[142][143]) assumes, as did Bowlby and Ainsworth, that a primary purpose of the attachment system for children is to maintain the attachment figure's availability. In the ABC+D model, as defined by Mary Main and Judith Solomon, the purpose is to maintain proximity.[143] (Not all attachment theorists who use the ABC+D model use the same definitions as Mary Main. Increasingly, they use terms and definitions identical, or nearly so to Crittenden's.)[143][144][145]

The DMM rejects the concept of disorganized attachment, instead arguing that people can organize a response to almost all forms of danger, even if the response is increased aggression or ignoring physical and psychological pain.[146] Granqvist and 42 other attachment experts agreed that the concept of disorganized attachment, as understood in 2017, has little or no utility, and may not be used clinically or forensically.[4] However, Duschinsky points out that it is unclear why the disorganized concept did not live up to its promise, nor what might be the significance of the different definitions described above, and it may be that Main's definitions have utility for some purpose which has yet to be discovered.[5]

The ABC+D model was widely accepted by the research community from about 1990–2017, although Main was calling for caution in the use of disorganized attachment in clinical and forensic settings by at least 2011.[147] In 2018 van IJzendoorn et al. pointed out the replication crisis of ABC+D-based attachment assessments, and called for the ABC+D attachment community to revisit its foundations.[148]

8. Criticisms

After Granqvist, and 42 other authors (2017),[4] clearly identified the limits and misapplication of the disorganized attachment category, Van IJzendoorn, et al., and Crittenden and Spieker exchanged a series of comments and criticisms about the ABC+D and DMM attachment models in the November/December issue of Infant Mental Health (volume 39, number 6, 2018). Van IJzendoorn criticized the DMM for having too many classifications, 29 basic patterns, compared to the ABC+D model which has 24. While conceding that assessments using the ABC+D attachment model cannot be used forensically, he argued neither could DMM assessments since they did not meet the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard required in court.[149] However, "more likely than not" is the correct standard in civil (non-criminal) court cases.[23] Van IJzendoorn argued DMM assessments lack validity as much as ABC+D assessments do, which Crittenden (and others[31]) dispute. Van IJzendoorn found fault with Crittenden's position that the DMM is still developing. Crittenden responded that a complex and transdisciplinary model of human development must always continue to add new information and develop.

Other people echo Van Ijzendoorn's point about complexity in terms of becoming a reliable coder and being able to use a DMM-assessment to testify forensically about a particular person's self-protective strategies in a particular context. The PAA and SAA can take a year or more to learn, and the AAI can take several years. In fact, there are few people in the world who can use DMM-assessments forensically, particularly under the requirements of IASA's Family Court Protocol.

David Pocock found the DMM useful, and powerful, and at the same raising the risk of reductionism and reification. The DMM attempts to make it clear that people are not reduced to "a C3" or "an A4", instead they are described as using strategies from those patterns. Reification involves making something abstract concrete, turning an attachment strategy used in one situation into what completely defines the person. He echoes common concerns that attachment, and the DMM in particular, is such a powerful model it is potentially easy to fall into the use of counterproductive shortcuts.[150]

The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Philosophy:Dynamic-maturational_model_of_attachment_and_adaptation


  1. Bretherton, lnge (1994), "The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.", A century of developmental psychology. (Washington: American Psychological Association): pp. 431–471, doi:10.1037/10155-029, ISBN 1-55798-233-3  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F10155-029
  2. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Partridge, Mary F.; Claussen, Angelika H. (1991). "Family patterns of relationship in normative and dysfunctional families". Development and Psychopathology 3 (4): 491–512. doi:10.1017/s0954579400007653. ISSN 0954-5794.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fs0954579400007653
  3. Duschinsky, Robbie (2015). "The Emergence of the Disorganized/Disoriented (D) Attachment Classification". History of Psychology 18:1 (1): 32–46. doi:10.1037/a0038524. PMID 25664884.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4321742
  4. Granqvist, Pehr; Sroufe, L. Alan; Main, Mary; Hesse, Erik; Steele, Miriam; Ijzendoorn, Marinus van; Solomon, Judith; Goldwyn, Ruth et al. (2017-11-02). "Disorganized attachment in infancy: a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers". Attachment & Human Development 19 (6): 534–558. doi:10.1080/14616734.2017.1354040. ISSN 1461-6734. PMID 28745146.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=5600694
  5. Landa, Sophie; Duschinsky, Robbie (2013). "Letters from Ainsworth: Contesting the 'Organization' of Attachment". Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 22 (2): 172–177. ISSN 1719-8429. PMID 23667365.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3647635
  6. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Ainsworth, Mary D. S. (1989-06-30), "Child maltreatment and attachment theory", Child Maltreatment (Cambridge University Press): pp. 432–463, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665707.015, ISBN 978-0-521-37969-4  https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fcbo9780511665707.015
  7. Landa, Sophie; Duschinsky, Robbie (2013-09-01). "Crittenden's Dynamic–Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation" (in en). Review of General Psychology 17 (3): 326–338. doi:10.1037/a0032102. ISSN 1089-2680. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1037/a0032102. 
  8. (in en) Dr Andrea Landini: Second DMM Community Interview, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGl2DVjGmPw, retrieved 2021-06-13 
  9. Crittenden, Patricia M; Landini, Andrea; Spieker, Susan J (2021-04-22). "Staying alive: A 21st century agenda for mental health, child protection and forensic services" (in en). Human Systems 1: 29–51. doi:10.1177/26344041211007831. ISSN 2634-4041.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F26344041211007831
  10. Bowlby, John (1982). Attachment and loss. New York. ISBN 0-465-00543-8. OCLC 24186.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/24186
  11. McKinsey., Claussen, Angelika Hartl. Crittenden, Patricia (2004). The organization of attachment relationships : maturation, culture, and context. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-53346-5. OCLC 224357509.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/224357509
  12. Crittenden, Patricia M. (2006). "A dynamic-maturational model of attachment". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 27 (2): 105–115. doi:10.1002/j.1467-8438.2006.tb00704.x. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264219795. 
  13. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Landini, Andrea (2011). Assessing adult attachment: A dynamic-maturational approach to discourse analysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393706673. 
  14. Crittenden, Patricia M. (2015). Raising Parents: Attachment, parenting, and child safety (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp. 65 (Kindle edition). ISBN 978-0415508308. 
  15. Kozlowska, Kasia; Scher, Stephen; Helgeland, Helene (2020) (in en). Functional Somatic Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Stress-System Approach to Assessment and Treatment. Palgrave Texts in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-46183-6. https://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9783030461836. 
  16. Baim, Clark Michael (2020-03-01). "Applying the Dynamic-Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation in criminal justice interventions" (in en). Probation Journal 67 (1): 26–46. doi:10.1177/0264550519900236. ISSN 0264-5505.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0264550519900236
  17. Ansbro, Maria (2019-06-01). "A qualitative examination of attachment-based concepts in probation supervision" (in en). Probation Journal 66 (2): 181–200. doi:10.1177/0264550519833458. ISSN 0264-5505. https://bucks.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/17692/1/17692_Ansbro_M.pdf. 
  18. McKinsey Crittenden, Patricia (1999). "Chapter VII. Danger and Development: The Organization of Self‐Protective Strategies". Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 64 (3): 145–171. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00037. ISSN 0037-976X. PMID 10597546.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F1540-5834.00037
  19. Grey, Benedict; Gunson, Jeremy (2019). "Invisible Children? How attachment theory and evidenced-based procedures can bring to light the hidden experience of children at risk from their parents". in Wendy Bunston and Sarah Jones. Supporting vulnerable babies and young children : interventions for working with trauma, mental health, illness and other complex challenges. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. pp. 191–207. ISBN 978-1-78592-370-8. OCLC 1104916440. http://worldcat.org/oclc/1104916440. 
  20. Laming, Lord (2003). "The Victoria Climbié Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry". London Department of Health. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273183/5730.pdf. 
  21. Duschinsky, Robbie; Solomon, Judith (2017). "Infant disorganized attachment: Clarifying levels of analysis". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (4): 524–538. doi:10.1177/1359104516685602. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 28357887. PMC 5641982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359104516685602. 
  22. Crittenden, Patricia M.. "A new perspective on personality disorders". https://familyrelationsinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/personality_disorders.pdf. 
  23. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Spieker, Susan J. (2018). "Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation versus ABC+D assessments of attachment in child protection and treatment: reply to Van IJzendoorn, Bakermans, Steele, & Granqvist". Infant Mental Health Journal 39 (6): 647–651. doi:10.1002/imhj.21750. ISSN 0163-9641. PMID 30394537.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fimhj.21750
  24. Crittenden, Patricia M; Robson, Katrina; Tooby, Alison; Fleming, Charles (2017-07-01). "Are mothers' protective attachment strategies related to their children's strategies?" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (3): 358–377. doi:10.1177/1359104517704027. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 28429614.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104517704027
  25. "DMM Model" (in en-US). https://familyrelationsinstitute.org/dmm-model/. 
  26. Duschinsky, Robbie; Bakkum, Lianne; Mannes, Julia M. M.; Skinner, Guy C. M.; Turner, Melody; Mann, Alissa; Coughlan, Barry; Reijman, Sophie et al. (2021-05-12). "Six attachment discourses: convergence, divergence and relay". Attachment & Human Development 23 (4): 355–374. doi:10.1080/14616734.2021.1918448. ISSN 1461-6734. PMID 33978553.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F14616734.2021.1918448
  27. CRITTENDEN, PATRICIA M. (1993). "An Information-Processing Perspective on the Behavior of Neglectful Parents". Criminal Justice and Behavior 20 (1): 27–48. doi:10.1177/0093854893020001004. ISSN 0093-8548.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854893020001004
  28. Crittenden, Patricia; Lang, Claudia; Claussen, Angelika; Partridge, Mary (2000). "Relations among mothers' procedural, semantic, and episodic internal representational models of parenting". in Crittenden, Patricia. The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 214–233. 
  29. Farnfield, Steve; Hautamäki, Airi; Nørbech, Peder; Sahhar, Nicola (2010-07-01). "DMM assessments of attachment and adaptation: Procedures, validity and utility" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 313–328. doi:10.1177/1359104510364315. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603420.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510364315
  30. Farnfield, Steve, ed (2014). The Routledge handbook of attachment: assessment. London. ISBN 978-0-415-53824-4. OCLC 841895216.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/841895216
  31. Steele, Howard; Steele, Miriam (2008). Steele, H. and Steele M.. ed. Clinical applications of the adult attachment interview. Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-59385-696-0. OCLC 190860078. http://worldcat.org/oclc/190860078. 
  32. Purnell, Chris (2011). "The application of the Dynamic-Maturational Model of Attachment to psychotherapy and some reflections on practice". Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis 5 (3): 209–225. 
  33. Hautamäki, Airi (2014). "3". in Farnfield and Holmes. Screening for maternal relationships at risk with the CARE-index. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-53825-1. 
  34. Crittenden, Patricia M. (1981). "Abusing, neglecting, problematic, and adequate dyads: Differentiating by patterns of interaction". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 27 (3): 201–218. 
  35. Crittenden, Patricia M.; DiLalla, David L. (1988). "Compulsive compliance: The development of an inhibitory coping strategy in infancy" (in en). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 16 (5): 585–599. doi:10.1007/BF00914268. ISSN 0091-0627. PMID 3235749. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00914268. 
  36. Forcada-Guex, M.; Pierrehumbert, B.; Borghini, A.; Moessinger, A.; Muller-Nix, C. (2006-07-01). "Early Dyadic Patterns of Mother-Infant Interactions and Outcomes of Prematurity at 18 Months". Pediatrics 118 (1): e107–e114. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1145. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 16818525.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1542%2Fpeds.2005-1145
  37. Parfitt, Ylva; Pike, Alison; Ayers, Susan (2013-11-21). "Infant Developmental Outcomes: A Family Systems Perspective". Infant and Child Development 23 (4): 353–373. doi:10.1002/icd.1830. ISSN 1522-7227. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/15444/1/Parfitt%20et%20al%202014%20text%20copy.pdf. 
  38. Crittenden, Patricia M. (1985). "Maltreated Infants: Vulnerability and Resilience" (in en). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 26 (1): 85–96. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb01630.x. ISSN 1469-7610. PMID 3972934. https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb01630.x. 
  39. Farnfield, Steve; Hautamäki, Airi; Nørbech, Peder; Sahhar, Nicola (2010). "DMM assessments of attachment and adaptation: Procedures, validity and utility" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 313–328. doi:10.1177/1359104510364315. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603420. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45094456. 
  40. Crittenden, Patricia M. (1985). "Social Networks, Quality of Child Rearing, and Child Development". Child Development 56 (5): 1299–1313. doi:10.2307/1130245. ISSN 0009-3920.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F1130245
  41. Pleshkova, Natalia L.; Muhamedrahimov, Rifkat J. (2010-07-01). "Quality of attachment in St Petersburg (Russian Federation): A sample of family-reared infants" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 355–362. doi:10.1177/1359104510365453. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603423.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510365453
  42. Steele, Miriam (2003). Attachment, actual experience and mental representation. In Green, Vivian (ed), Emotional Development in Psychoanalysis, Neuroscience and Attachment Theory: Creating Connections. Brunner-Routledge, Hove, UK, chapter 3.
  43. Teti, Douglas M.; Kim, Bo-Ram (2014). "4". in Farnfield and Holmes. Observational assessments of attachment, a review and discussion of clinical applications. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-53825-1. 
  44. Teti, Douglas M.; Gelfand, Donna M. (1997). "The Preschool Assessment of Attachment: Construct validity in a sample of depressed and non-depressed families". Development and Psychopathology 9 (3): 517–536. doi:10.1017/s0954579497001284. ISSN 0954-5794. PMID 9327237.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fs0954579497001284
  45. Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey; Claussen, Angelika Hartl; Kozlowska, Kasia (2007). "Choosing a Valid Assessment of Attachment for Clinical Use: A Comparative Study". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 28 (2): 78–87. doi:10.1375/anft.28.2.78. ISSN 0814-723X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1375%2Fanft.28.2.78
  46. Crittenden, Patricia; Kozlowska, Kasia; Landini, Andrea (2010-02-22). "Assessing attachment in school-age children". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (2): 185–208. doi:10.1177/1359104509356741. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20176770.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104509356741
  47. George, Carol; Kaplan, Nancy; Main, Mary (1985). The Adult Attachment Interview [protocol], unpublished manuscript. University of California at Berkeley. 
  48. Baldoni, Franco; Minghetti, Mattia; Craparo, Giuseppe; Facondini, Elisa; Cena, Loredana; Schimmenti, Adriano (2018-01-08). "Comparing Main, Goldwyn, and Hesse (Berkeley) and Crittenden (DMM) coding systems for classifying Adult Attachment Interview transcripts: an empirical report". Attachment & Human Development 20 (4): 423–438. doi:10.1080/14616734.2017.1421979. ISSN 1461-6734. PMID 29308700.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F14616734.2017.1421979
  49. Crittenden, Patricia M. (2014). Toddler CARE-Index (TCI) Manual, unpublished training manual. Miami, FL: Family Relations Institute. 
  50. Crittenden, Patricia M. (2005). Transition to Adulthood Attachment Interview (TAAI), unpublished training manual. Miami, FL: Family Relations Institute. 
  51. Landini, A. , Kozlowska, K., Davies, F., & Chudleigh, K. (2012). Adoleszenz und das TAAI / Adolescence and the TAAI. In M. Stokowy & N. Sahhar (Eds.) Bindung und Gefahr. Das Dynamische Reifungsmodell der Bindung und Anpassung (pp. 113-140). Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
  52. Grey, Ben; Farnfield, Steve (2017-03-20). "The Meaning of the Child Interview (MotC) – the initial validation of a new procedure for assessing and understanding the parent-child relationships of "at risk" families". Journal of Children's Services 12 (1): 16–31. doi:10.1108/jcs-03-2016-0006. ISSN 1746-6660. https://pure.roehampton.ac.uk/ws/files/1287454/Meaning_of_the_Child_Interview_Validity_JCS.pdf. 
  53. McKenzie, Rebecca; Dallos, Rudi; Vassallo, Tara; Myhill, Craig; Gude, Alexandra; Bond, Nicholas (2021-02-18). "Family Experience of Safe: A New Intervention for Families of Children with a Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder". Contemporary Family Therapy. doi:10.1007/s10591-021-09568-8. ISSN 0892-2764.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10591-021-09568-8
  54. Grey, Ben; Farnfield, Steve (2017). "The Meaning of the Child Interview: A new procedure for assessing and understanding parent–child relationships of 'at-risk' families" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (2): 204–218. doi:10.1177/1359104516633495. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 26940120. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1359104516633495. 
  55. Farnfield, Steve (2016). "The Child Attachment and Play Assessment (CAPA): Validation of a new approach to coding narrative stems with children ages 3–11 years." (in en). International Journal of Play Therapy 25 (4): 217–229. doi:10.1037/a0038726. ISSN 1939-0629. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0038726. 
  56. Main, Mary; Hesse, Erik; Hesse, Siegfried (July 2011). "Attachment theory and research: overview with suggested applications to child custody". Family Court Review 49 (3): 426–463. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01383.x. ISSN 1531-2445.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1744-1617.2011.01383.x
  57. George, Carol; Isaacs, Marla B.; Marvin, Robert S. (July 2011). "Incorporating Attachment Assessment into Custody Evaluations: the Case of a 2-year-old and Her Parents". Family Court Review 49 (3): 483–500. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01386.x. ISSN 1531-2445.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1744-1617.2011.01386.x
  58. Spieker, Susan J.; Crittenden, Patricia M. (2018). "Can Attachment Inform Decision-Making in Child Protection and Forensic Settings?" (in en). Infant Mental Health Journal 39 (6): 625–641. doi:10.1002/imhj.21746. ISSN 1097-0355. PMID 30395356.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fimhj.21746
  59. Dallos, Rudi; Crittenden, Patricia M.; Landini, Andrea; Spieker, Susan; Vetere, Arlene (2020-06-01). "Family Functional Formulations as Guides to Psychological Treatment" (in en). Contemporary Family Therapy 42 (2): 190–201. doi:10.1007/s10591-019-09525-6. ISSN 1573-3335.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10591-019-09525-6
  60. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Claussen, Angelika H.; Sugarman, David B. (1994). "Physical and psychological maltreatment in middle childhood and adolescence". Development and Psychopathology 6 (1): 145–164. doi:10.1017/s0954579400005927. ISSN 0954-5794.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2Fs0954579400005927
  61. Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey (1999), "Child Neglect: Causes and Contributors", Neglected Children: Research, Practice, and Policy (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.): pp. 47–68, doi:10.4135/9781452225586.n3, ISBN 978-0-7619-1842-4  https://dx.doi.org/10.4135%2F9781452225586.n3
  62. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Landini, Andrea; Claussen, Angelika H. (2001), "A Dynamic-Maturational Approach to Treatment of Maltreated Children", Handbook of Psychological Services for Children and Adolescents (New York: Oxford University Press): pp. 373–398, doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780195125238.003.0018, ISBN 978-0-19-512523-8  https://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fmed%3Apsych%2F9780195125238.003.0018
  63. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Farnfield, Steve (2007). "Fostering families: An integrative approach involving the biological and foster family systems". in Lee, R.E.. Handbook of Relational Therapy for Foster Children and their Families. Washington, D.C.: Child Welfare League of America. pp. 227–250. 
  64. Barlow, J.; Davis, H.; McIntosh, E.; Jarrett, P.; Mockford, C.; Stewart-Brown, S. (2007-03-01). "Role of home visiting in improving parenting and health in families at risk of abuse and neglect: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation". Archives of Disease in Childhood 92 (3): 229–233. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.095117. ISSN 0003-9888. PMID 17068074.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2083433
  65. Coohey, Carol; O'Leary, Patrick (2008). "Mothers' protection of their children after discovering they have been sexually abused: An information-processing perspective". Child Abuse & Neglect 32 (2): 245–259. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.06.002. ISSN 0145-2134. PMID 18304629.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chiabu.2007.06.002
  66. Ostler, Teresa (2010). "Assessing parenting risk within the context of severe and persistent mental illness: Validating an observational measure for families with child protective service involvement". Infant Mental Health Journal 31 (5): 467–485. doi:10.1002/imhj.20267. ISSN 0163-9641. PMID 28543839.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fimhj.20267
  67. Strathearn, L. (2011-10-18). "Maternal Neglect: Oxytocin, Dopamine and the Neurobiology of Attachment". Journal of Neuroendocrinology 23 (11): 1054–1065. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02228.x. ISSN 0953-8194. PMID 21951160.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3319675
  68. Wilcox, Daniel T.; Baim, Clark (2015). "Applications of the Dynamic-Maturational Model of Attachment with Children Involved in Care and Family Proceedings". Child Abuse Review 25 (4): 287–299. doi:10.1002/car.2380. ISSN 0952-9136.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fcar.2380
  69. Landini, Andrea; Crittenden, Patricia M.; Landi, Giulia (2016). "The parents of child psychiatric patients". Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health 4: 1087. 
  70. Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey; Baim, Clark (2017-04-21), "Using Assessment of Attachment in Child Care Proceedings to Guide Intervention", The Wiley Handbook of What Works in Child Maltreatment (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd): pp. 385–402, doi:10.1002/9781118976111.ch23, ISBN 978-1-118-97611-1  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F9781118976111.ch23
  71. Crittenden, Patricia M. (1992). "Children's strategies for coping with adverse home environments: An interpretation using attachment theory". Child Abuse & Neglect 16 (3): 329–343. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(92)90043-q. ISSN 0145-2134. PMID 1617468.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2F0145-2134%2892%2990043-q
  72. Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey (1998), "Dangerous behavior and dangerous contexts: A 35-year perspective on research on the developmental effects of child physical abuse.", Violence against children in the family and the community. (Washington: American Psychological Association): pp. 11–38, doi:10.1037/10292-001, ISBN 1-55798-480-8  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F10292-001
  73. Crittenden, Patricia; Claussen, Angelika (2002). "Developmental psychopathology perspectives on substance abuse and relationship violence". in Wekerle, C.. The violence and addiction equation: Theoretical and clinical issues in substance abuse and relationship violence. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Mazel. pp. 44–63. 
  74. Worley, Kierron O.; Walsh, Susan; Lewis, Kathryn (2004). "An examination of parenting experiences in male perpetrators of domestic violence: A qualitative study". Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 77 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1348/147608304322874245. ISSN 1476-0835. PMID 15025903.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1348%2F147608304322874245
  75. Nørbech, Peder Chr. Bryhn; Crittenden, Patricia M.; Hartmann, Ellen (2013). "Self-Protective Strategies, Violence and Psychopathy: Theory and a Case Study" (in en). Journal of Personality Assessment 95 (6): 571–584. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.823441. ISSN 0022-3891. PMID 23980823. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223891.2013.823441. 
  76. CRITTENDEN, PATRICIA M. (1993). "An Information-Processing Perspective on the Behavior of Neglectful Parents". Criminal Justice and Behavior 20 (1): 27–48. doi:10.1177/0093854893020001004. ISSN 0093-8548.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854893020001004
  77. Haapasalo, Jaana; Puupponen, Mervi; Crittenden, Patricia M. (1999-03-02). "Victim to Victimizer: The Psychology of Isomorphism in a Case of a Recidivist Pedophile in Finland". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 7 (3): 97–115. doi:10.1300/j070v07n03_07. ISSN 1053-8712.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1300%2Fj070v07n03_07
  78. Kwako, Laura E.; Noll, Jennie G.; Putnam, Frank W.; Trickett, Penelope K. (2010). "Childhood sexual abuse and attachment: An intergenerational perspective". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 407–422. doi:10.1177/1359104510367590. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603427.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3161402
  79. Kozlowska, Kasia (2010). "The Bowl of Terror: A Case Study of an Adolescent Perpetrator of Sexual Abuse". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 31 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1375/anft.31.1.43. ISSN 0814-723X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1375%2Fanft.31.1.43
  80. Allam, Jayne; Baim, Clark (2017), "Understanding attachment strategies in adult men who have committed sexual offences", Working with Sex Offenders (Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge: Routledge): pp. 74–85, doi:10.4324/9781315673462-7, ISBN 978-1-315-67346-2  https://dx.doi.org/10.4324%2F9781315673462-7
  81. Rask, Charlotte Ulrikka; Ørnbøl, Eva; Olsen, Else Marie; Fink, Per; Skovgaard, Anne Mette (2013-02-01). "Infant Behaviors Are Predictive of Functional Somatic Symptoms at Ages 5-7 Years: Results from the Copenhagen Child Cohort CCC2000" (in en). The Journal of Pediatrics 162 (2): 335–342. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.08.001. ISSN 0022-3476. PMID 23026486. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347612009055. 
  82. Maunder, Robert G.; Hunter, Jonathan J.; Atkinson, Leslie; Steiner, Meir; Wazana, Ashley; Fleming, Alison S.; Moss, Ellen; Gaudreau, Helene et al. (June 2017). "An Attachment-Based Model of the Relationship Between Childhood Adversity and Somatization in Children and Adults". Psychosomatic Medicine 79 (5): 506–513. doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000437. ISSN 0033-3174. PMID 27941580.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2Fpsy.0000000000000437
  83. Kozlowska, Kasia; Scher, Stephen; Williams, Leanne M. (2011). "Patterns of Emotional-Cognitive Functioning in Pediatric Conversion Patients: Implications for the conceptualization of conversion disorders". Psychosomatic Medicine 73 (9): 775–788. doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3182361e12. ISSN 0033-3174. PMID 22048837.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2Fpsy.0b013e3182361e12
  84. Ratnamohan, Lux; Kozlowska, Kasia (2017-03-09). "When things get complicated: At-risk attachment in children and adolescents with chronic pain". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (4): 588–602. doi:10.1177/1359104517692850. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 28994326.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104517692850
  85. The Routledge handbook of attachment: implications and interventions (First ed.). New York: Routledge. 2014. ISBN 978-0-415-70611-7. OCLC 870211293.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/870211293
  86. Dallos, Rudi (2001). "ANT-Attachment Narrative Therapy". Journal of Family Psychotherapy 12 (2): 43–72. doi:10.1300/j085v12n02_04. ISSN 0897-5353.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1300%2Fj085v12n02_04
  87. Baim, Clark; Morrison, Tony (2011). Attachment-based practice with adults: Understanding strategies and promoting positive change. Hove, UK: Pavilion. ISBN 978-1-908066-17-6. 
  88. Nørbech, Peder Chr. Bryhn; Crittenden, Patricia M.; Hartmann, Ellen (2013). "Self-Protective Strategies, Violence and Psychopathy: Theory and a Case Study". Journal of Personality Assessment 95 (6): 571–584. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.823441. ISSN 0022-3891. PMID 23980823.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F00223891.2013.823441
  89. Kozlowska, Kasia; Hanney, Lesley (2002). "The Network Perspective: An Integration of Attachment and Family Systems Theories*". Family Process 41 (3): 285–312. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41303.x. ISSN 0014-7370. PMID 12395561.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1545-5300.2002.41303.x
  90. Crittenden, Patricia; Dallos, Rudi; Landini, Andrea; Kozlowska, Kasia (2014). Attachment and family therapy. London: Open University Press. ISBN 9780335235902. 
  91. Dallos, Rudi (2019). Don't blame the parents: positive intentions, scripts and change in family therapy. London: Open University Press. ISBN 978-0-335-24345-7. OCLC 1098323297.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1098323297
  92. Robson, Katrina; Wetherell, Annette (2011). "The use of the Dynamic Maturational Model of attachment and adaptation within a systemic setting in CAMHS". The Cumbria Partnership Journal of Research, Practice and Learning 1: 48–52. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= 
  93. Robson, Katrina; Tooby, Alison; Duschinsky, Robbie (2015). "Love Barrow Families: A case study of transforming public services". in Vincent, S.. Early intervention: Supporting and strengthening families. Edinburgh, UK: Dunedin Academic Press. pp. 69–84. https://www.lovebarrowfamilies.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/LBfs-published-chapter-2015.pdf. 
  94. Mullick, Mrinal; Miller, Laura J.; Jacobsen, Teresa (2001). "Insight Into Mental Illness and Child Maltreatment Risk Among Mothers With Major Psychiatric Disorders". Psychiatric Services 52 (4): 488–492. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.488. ISSN 1075-2730. PMID 11274495.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1176%2Fappi.ps.52.4.488
  95. Pocock, David (2018), "Working with emotional systems: four new maps", Systems and Psychoanalysis (Routledge): pp. 93–109, 2009, doi:10.4324/9780429480706-6, ISBN 978-0-429-48070-6  https://dx.doi.org/10.4324%2F9780429480706-6
  96. Pocock, David (2010-10-05). "Emotions as ecosystemic adaptations". Journal of Family Therapy 32 (4): 362–378. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00517.x. ISSN 0163-4445.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-6427.2010.00517.x
  97. Wilkinson, Simon R. (2010). "Another day older and deeper in therapy: Can the Dynamic-Maturational Model offer a way out?". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 423–432. doi:10.1177/1359104510368208. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603428.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510368208
  98. Strathearn, Lane; Fonagy, Peter; Amico, Janet; Montague, P Read (2009-08-26). "Adult Attachment Predicts Maternal Brain and Oxytocin Response to Infant Cues". Neuropsychopharmacology 34 (13): 2655–2666. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.103. ISSN 0893-133X. PMID 19710635.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3041266
  99. Kim, Sohye; Fonagy, Peter; Allen, Jon; Strathearn, Lane (2014-03-17). "Mothers' unresolved trauma blunts amygdala response to infant distress". Social Neuroscience 9 (4): 352–363. doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.896287. ISSN 1747-0919. PMID 24635646.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4260525
  100. Iyengar, Udita; Kim, Sohye; Martinez, Sheila; Fonagy, Peter; Strathearn, Lane (2014-09-01). "Unresolved trauma in mothers: intergenerational effects and the role of reorganization". Frontiers in Psychology 5: 966. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00966. ISSN 1664-1078. PMID 25225490.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4150444
  101. Kim, Sohye; Strathearn, Lane (2017-03-31). "Trauma, Mothering, and Intergenerational Transmission: A Synthesis of Behavioral and Oxytocin Research" (in en). The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 70 (1): 200–223. doi:10.1080/00797308.2016.1277897. ISSN 0079-7308. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00797308.2016.1277897. 
  102. Strathearn, Lane (2018-03-26), "Exploring the neurobiology of attachment", Developmental Science and Psychoanalysis (Routledge): pp. 117–140, doi:10.4324/9780429473654-8, ISBN 978-0-429-47365-4  https://dx.doi.org/10.4324%2F9780429473654-8
  103. McKinsey Crittenden, Patricia; Poggioli, Daniele (2012-06-27), "PTSD in the Context of Childhood Endangerment: Implications for Assessment and Treatment", Post-Traumatic Syndromes in Childhood and Adolescence (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd): pp. 391–415, doi:10.1002/9780470669280.ch20, ISBN 978-0-470-66928-0  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F9780470669280.ch20
  104. McKinsey Crittenden, Patricia; Poggioli, Daniele (2012-06-27), "PTSD in the Context of Childhood Endangerment: Implications for Assessment and Treatment", Post-Traumatic Syndromes in Childhood and Adolescence (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd): pp. 391–415, doi:10.1002/9780470669280.ch20, ISBN 978-0-470-66928-0  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F9780470669280.ch20
  105. Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey; Heller, Mary Brownescombe (2017). "The Roots of Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Childhood Trauma, Information Processing, and Self-protective Strategies" (in en). Chronic Stress 1: 247054701668296. doi:10.1177/2470547016682965. ISSN 2470-5470. PMID 32440576.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=7219921
  106. Dallos, Rudi; Smart, Cordet (2011-05-12). "An exploration of family dynamics and attachment strategies in a family with ADHD/conduct problems". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 16 (4): 535–550. doi:10.1177/1359104510387391. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 21565873.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510387391
  107. Syrjänen, Milla; Hautamäki, Airi; Pleshkova, Natalia; Maliniemi, Sinikka (2018). "Adults with ADHD – A retrospective account of the family systems and attachment relationships". Clinical Neuropsychiatry 15:2: 123–131. ISSN 1724-4935. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/237519. 
  108. Syrjänen, Milla; Hautamäki, Airi; Pleshkova, Natalia; Maliniemi, Sinikka (2019-04-03). "Attachment and sensitivity among parents with ADHD – a multiple-case study". Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 24 (2): 156–166. doi:10.1080/13632752.2019.1602985. ISSN 1363-2752.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F13632752.2019.1602985
  109. Crittenden, Patricia M (2017-07-01). "Formulating autism systemically: Part 1 – A review of the published literature and case assessments" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (3): 378–389. doi:10.1177/1359104517713241. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 28693401.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104517713241
  110. Brewerton, Nicky; Robson, Katrina; Crittenden, Patricia M (2017-07-01). "Formulating autism systemically: Part 2 – A 12-year prospective case study" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (3): 390–401. doi:10.1177/1359104517714381. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 28693400.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104517714381
  111. McKenzie, Rebecca; Dallos, Rudi (2017-10-01). "Autism and attachment difficulties: Overlap of symptoms, implications and innovative solutions" (in en). Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22 (4): 632–648. doi:10.1177/1359104517707323. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 28530116.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104517707323
  112. McKenzie, Rebecca; Dallos, Rudi; Stedmon, Jacqui; Hancocks, Helen; Vickery, Patricia Jane; Barton, Andy; Vassallo, Tara; Myhill, Craig et al. (2020-12-01). "SAFE, a new therapeutic intervention for families of children with autism: a randomised controlled feasibility trial" (in en). BMJ Open 10 (12): e038411. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038411. ISSN 2044-6055. PMID 33384385.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=7780715
  113. Grey, Benedict; Dallos, Rudi; Stancer, Rebecca (2021-05-07). "Feeling 'like you're on … a prison ship' – Understanding the caregiving and attachment narratives of parents of autistic children" (in en). Human Systems 1: 96–114. doi:10.1177/26344041211000202. ISSN 2634-4041.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F26344041211000202
  114. Crittenden, Patricia M.; Newman, Louise (2010). "Comparing models of borderline personality disorder: Mothers' experience, self-protective strategies, and dispositional representations". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 433–451. doi:10.1177/1359104510368209. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603429.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510368209
  115. Wilkinson, Simon R (2014-11-18). "Enriching practice of dialectic behaviour therapy with the dynamic maturational model of attachment and adaptation". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 21 (1): 95–107. doi:10.1177/1359104514558430. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 25410887.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104514558430
  116. Rindal, G. (2000). "Attachment Patterns in Patients Diagnosed with Avoidant Personality Disorder (Maskespill, Tilknytningsmøønster Hos Pasienter med Unnvikende Personlighetsforstyrrelse)". Dissertation Presented to the Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo. 
  117. Dallos, Rudi; Denford, S. (2006). "Family attachment narratives and eating disorders". Psychotherapy Section Review (BPS) 41: 4–16. 
  118. Zachrisson, Henrik Daae; Kulbotten, G. R. (2006). "Attachment in anorexia nervosa: An exploration of associations with eating disorder psychopathology and psychiatric symptoms". Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity 11 (4): 163–170. doi:10.1007/bf03327567. ISSN 1124-4909. PMID 17272945.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf03327567
  119. Ringer, Francoise; Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey (2007). "Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders". European Eating Disorders Review 15 (2): 119–130. doi:10.1002/erv.761. ISSN 1072-4133. PMID 17676680.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Ferv.761
  120. Zachrisson, H. D.; Sommerfeldt, B.; Skårderud, F. (2011). "What you use decides what you get: Comparing classificatory procedures for the Adult Attachment Interview in eating disorder research". Eating and Weight Disorders 16 (4): e285–e288. doi:10.1007/bf03327474. ISSN 1124-4909. PMID 22526135.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf03327474
  121. Kozlowska, Kasia; Williams, Leanne M. (2009). "Self-protective organization in children with conversion and somatoform disorders". Journal of Psychosomatic Research 67 (3): 223–233. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.03.016. ISSN 0022-3999. PMID 19686878.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jpsychores.2009.03.016
  122. Kozlowska, Kasia; Scher, Stephen; Williams, Leanne M. (2011). "Patterns of Emotional-Cognitive Functioning in Pediatric Conversion Patients". Psychosomatic Medicine 73 (9): 775–788. doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3182361e12. ISSN 0033-3174. PMID 22048837.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2Fpsy.0b013e3182361e12
  123. Kozlowska, Kasia; Palmer, Donna M.; Brown, Kerri J.; Scher, Stephen; Chudleigh, Catherine; Davies, Fiona; Williams, Leanne M. (2014). "Conversion disorder in children and adolescents: A disorder of cognitive control". Journal of Neuropsychology 9 (1): 87–108. doi:10.1111/jnp.12037. ISSN 1748-6645. PMID 24405496.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fjnp.12037
  124. Kozlowska, Kasia; Palmer, Donna M.; Brown, Kerri J.; McLean, Loyola; Scher, Stephen; Gevirtz, Richard; Chudleigh, Catherine; Williams, Leanne M. (2015). "Reduction of Autonomic Regulation in Children and Adolescents With Conversion Disorders". Psychosomatic Medicine 77 (4): 356–370. doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000184. ISSN 0033-3174. PMID 25954919.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2Fpsy.0000000000000184
  125. Kozlowska, Kasia; Foley, Sue; Crittenden, Patricia (2006). "Factitious Illness by Proxy: Understanding Underlying Psychological Processes and Motivations". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 27 (2): 92–104. doi:10.1002/j.1467-8438.2006.tb00703.x. ISSN 0814-723X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fj.1467-8438.2006.tb00703.x
  126. Kozlowska, Kasia; Foley, Sue; Savage, Blanche (2012-10-18). "Fabricated Illness: Working within the Family System to Find a Pathway to Health". Family Process 51 (4): 570–587. doi:10.1111/famp.12000. ISSN 0014-7370. PMID 23230986.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Ffamp.12000
  127. Kozlowska, Kasia; English, Margaret; Savage, Blanche; Chudleigh, Catherine; Davies, Fiona; Paull, Marilyn; Elliot, Alison; Jenkins, Amanda (2013). "Multimodal Rehabilitation: A Mind-Body Family-Based Intervention for Children and Adolescents Impaired by Medically Unexplained Symptoms. Part 2: Case Studies and Outcomes". The American Journal of Family Therapy 41 (3): 212–231. doi:10.1080/01926187.2012.677723. ISSN 0192-6187.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F01926187.2012.677723
  128. Letourneau, Nicole L.; Kozyrskyj, Anita L.; Cosic, Nela; Ntanda, Henry N.; Anis, Lubna; Hart, Martha J.; Campbell, Tavis S.; Giesbrecht, Gerald F. (2017-05-26). "Maternal sensitivity and social support protect against childhood atopic dermatitis". Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 13 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/s13223-017-0199-4. ISSN 1710-1492. PMID 28559916.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=5446757
  129. Nørbech, Peder Chr. Bryhn; Grønnerød, Cato; Hartmann, Ellen (2015-07-30). "Identification With a Violent and Sadistic Aggressor: A Rorschach Study of Criminal Debt Collectors". Journal of Personality Assessment 98 (2): 135–145. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1063502. ISSN 0022-3891. PMID 26226052.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F00223891.2015.1063502
  130. Kozlowska, Kasia; Foley, Sue (2006). "Attachment and Risk of Future Harm: A Case of Non-Accidental Brain Injury". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 27 (2): 75–82. doi:10.1002/j.1467-8438.2006.tb00701.x. ISSN 0814-723X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fj.1467-8438.2006.tb00701.x
  131. Haapasalo, Jaana; Puupponen, Mervi; Crittenden, Patricia M. (1999-03-02). "Victim to Victimizer: The Psychology of Isomorphism in a Case of a Recidivist Pedophile in Finland". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 7 (3): 97–115. doi:10.1300/j070v07n03_07. ISSN 1053-8712.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1300%2Fj070v07n03_07
  132. Kozlowska, Kasia (March 2010). "The Bowl of Terror: A Case Study of an Adolescent Perpetrator of Sexual Abuse". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 31 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1375/anft.31.1.43. ISSN 0814-723X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1375%2Fanft.31.1.43
  133. Chisholm, Kim (1998). "A Three Year Follow-up of Attachment and Indiscriminate Friendliness in Children Adopted from Romanian Orphanages". Child Development 69 (4): 1092–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06162.x. ISSN 0009-3920. PMID 9768488.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8624.1998.tb06162.x
  134. Pleshkova, Natalia L.; Muhamedrahimov, Rifkat J. (2010). "Quality of attachment in St Petersburg (Russian Federation): A sample of family-reared infants". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 355–362. doi:10.1177/1359104510365453. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603423.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510365453
  135. Teti, Douglas M.; Gelfand, Donna M.; Messinger, Daniel S.; Isabella, Russell (1995). "Maternal depression and the quality of early attachment: An examination of infants, preschoolers, and their mothers.". Developmental Psychology 31 (3): 364–376. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.364. ISSN 1939-0599.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0012-1649.31.3.364
  136. Ayissi, L.; Hubin-Gayte, M. (2006). "Irritabilité du nouveau-né et dépression maternelle du post-partum". Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'Adolescence 54 (2): 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.neurenf.2006.01.007. ISSN 0222-9617.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neurenf.2006.01.007
  137. Conroy, Susan; Marks, Maureen N.; Schacht, Robin; Davies, Helen A.; Moran, Paul (2009). "The impact of maternal depression and personality disorder on early infant care". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 45 (3): 285–292. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0070-0. ISSN 0933-7954. PMID 19466372.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00127-009-0070-0
  138. Conroy, Susan; Pariante, Carmine M.; Marks, Maureen N.; Davies, Helen A.; Farrelly, Simone; Schacht, Robin; Moran, Paul (2012). "Maternal Psychopathology and Infant Development at 18 Months: The Impact of Maternal Personality Disorder and Depression". Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 51 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.007. ISSN 0890-8567. PMID 22176939.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jaac.2011.10.007
  139. Holmes, Paul; Farnfield, Steve (2014). The Routledge handbook of attachment: implications and interventions (First ed.). New York. ISBN 978-0-415-70611-7. OCLC 870211293.  http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/870211293
  140. Claussen, Angelika H.; Crittenden, Patricia M. (1991). "Physical and psychological maltreatment: Relations among types of maltreatment". Child Abuse & Neglect 15 (1–2): 5–18. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(91)90085-r. ISSN 0145-2134. PMID 2029672.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2F0145-2134%2891%2990085-r
  141. Crittenden, Patricia; Claussen, Angelika (1993). "Severity of maltreatment: Assessment and policy implications". in Hobbes, C.J.. Bailliere's Clinical Paediatrics: International practice and research. London: Bailliere Tindall. pp. 87–100. 
  142. Cassidy, Judith; Marvin, Robert (1992). Attachment organisation in preschool children: procedures and coding manual. Attachment Working Group of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Network on the transition from Infancy to Early Childhood, for training only, unpublished. 
  143. Duschinsky, Robbie (2020). Cornerstones of attachment research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-884206-4. OCLC 1154774522. http://worldcat.org/oclc/1154774522. 
  144. Cicchetti, Dante; Serafica, Felicisima C. (1981). "Interplay among behavioral systems: Illustrations from the study of attachment, affiliation, and wariness in young children with Down's syndrome.". Developmental Psychology 17 (1): 36–49. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.36. ISSN 0012-1649.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0012-1649.17.1.36
  145. Bosmans, Guy; Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.; Vervliet, Bram; Verhees, Martine W.F.T.; van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. (2020). "A learning theory of attachment: Unraveling the black box of attachment development". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 113: 287–298. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.014. ISSN 0149-7634. PMID 32276142.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neubiorev.2020.03.014
  146. Spieker, Susan J.; Crittenden, Patricia M. (2010). "Comparing the validity of two approaches to attachment theory: Disorganization versus danger-informed organization in the preschool years". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (1): 97–120. doi:10.1177/1359104509345878. PMID 19914941.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3770309
  147. Main, Mary; Hesse, Erik; Hesse, Siegfried (2011). "Attachment Theory and Research: Overview with Suggested Applications to Child Custody". Family Court Review 49 (3): 426–463. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01383.x. ISSN 1531-2445.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1744-1617.2011.01383.x
  148. Van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H.; Steele, Miriam; Granqvist, Pehr (2018). "On Exactitude in Science: A Map of the Empire the Size of the Empire". Infant Mental Health Journal 39 (6): 652–655. doi:10.1002/imhj.21751. ISSN 0163-9641. PMID 30418681.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fimhj.21751
  149. Van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H.; Bakermans, Jacob J.W.; Steele, Miriam; Granqvist, Pehr (2018-10-17). "Diagnostic use of crittenden's attachment measures in family court is not beyond a reasonable doubt". Infant Mental Health Journal 39 (6): 642–646. doi:10.1002/imhj.21747. ISSN 0163-9641. PMID 30329168.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fimhj.21747
  150. Pocock, David (2010). "The DMM - wow! But how to safely handle its potential strength?". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 15 (3): 303–311. doi:10.1177/1359104510369457. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 20603419.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1359104510369457
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!