Invasive Alien Plant Species in European Paper Production: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Invasive plant species can impede the establishment and growth of native plants and affect several ecosystem properties. These properties include soil cover, nutrient cycling, fire regimes, and hydrology. Controlling invasive plants is therefore a necessary, but usually expensive, step in restoring an ecosystem. The sustainability of materials with an emphasis on the use of local resources plays an important role in the circular economy. The use of alternative fibers from invasive plants promotes local production in smaller paper mills that offer the protection of local species and the reduction of waste and invasive plants.

  • fibers from invasive plant species
  • Europe
  • paper production
  • pulp
  • applications

1. Introduction

Industry is developing rapidly; population density is increasing and people have more and more needs due to the increasingly stressful and fast pace of life. The above-mentioned factors have a strong impact on the balance and processes in nature, as they greatly deplete the natural resources and raw materials needed to satisfy our diverse needs. Deeper and deeper are penetrated into geographical areas that were untouched in the past and are extremely important for the regulation of biological and climatic balance of the planet. Thus, it was felt that the consequences of the behavior in environmental problems such as the greenhouse effect, the depletion of the ozone layer, acid rain, smog, heavy metal emissions, soil and water pollution, and the depletion of renewable resources. In addition to all these industrial impacts, transportation, agriculture, energy production, and the consumer society that produces huge amounts of solid waste, including packaging, also contribute to pollution. For all these reasons, it is very important for sustainable development that the economic, social, and environmental sectors harmonize. As a result, a circular economy has evolved that works in the spirit of sustainable development. It is a new concept that aims to maximize the use of raw materials in the production and consumption cycle. Through the process of recycling, repair, and reuse, it aims to create a new “zero waste” lifestyle. It was intelligently planned and designed products from the beginning and can select or predict the production processes and resources used in advance. In this way, waste could be effectively managed waste while creating new business opportunities.
According to most scientific evidence related to biodiversity conservation, global warming and climate change can have significant impacts on human health and the environment. In order to improve the well-being and living conditions of present and future generations, it is important that the negative impacts of human and industrial activities be seriously considered at all stages of planning new developments.
The pulp and paper industry is one of the largest industries in the world with high capital investment. As shown in the preliminary CEPI report for 2021, the production of paper and paperboard in member countries increased by 5.8% compared to 2020. Global paper and board production increased by about 3%. Production of packaging grades is estimated to have increased by 7.1% compared to 2020. Within packaging grades, cardboard materials, which are mainly used for transport packaging and corrugated cardboard boxes, are positively influenced by the current e-commerce boom and recorded an increase of 7.8% [1].
In the paper industry, biomass, such as wood and other species, is undergoing constant change due to countries’ efforts to decarbonize, the rise of bio-based materials, and so on. The recent shortage of paper for various media, due to the shift from fiber to packaging applications, opens the space for alternative solutions. Recently, interest in the use of agricultural residues has increased.
Invasive alien plant species (IAPS) are harmful to the environment on a larger scale where they occur. According to the European Union definition, IAPS are species that have been displaced from their natural ecological range by human activities and species whose introduction and spread outside their natural ecological range pose a real threat to biodiversity and the economy [2]. It is reported that there are estimated to be over 12,000 alien species in Europe, of which about 10–15% are invasive. All EU Member States have relatively major problems with IAS on their territory.
The impact of invasive plants has been the subject of many studies, and many researchers have presented solutions for their removal and reuse. These species pose a major challenge to European ecosystems, especially because they destroy agricultural land and displace local vegetation. Their spread disturbs the balance of natural ecosystems in many ways. By competing with each other, transmitting diseases, altering soil and light conditions, and reshaping the functioning of the entire ecosystem, they pose a major threat to native species richness and habitat biodiversity. They displace native vegetation, destroy agricultural land, and cause billions of dollars of damage to the European economy each year. Therefore, they are considered a nuisance species with negative impacts on native species and ecosystems [3].
Nearly two-thirds of the plant species established in Europe were intentionally introduced for ornamental, horticultural, or agricultural purposes. The remaining species were introduced unintentionally, mostly in association with transport vectors or as contaminants of seeds and other commodities [3][4]. Of the invasive plant species that escaped human cultivation, some were intentional releases (i.e., planted in the wild to “beautify” the landscape), some were contaminants or stowaways, and few arrived unassisted [3][4][5][6]. Much less is known about the introduction and spread of non-native lower plants and fungi, and about changes in the number of non-native species in Europe over time. It is known that these taxa can have enormous impacts, with perhaps the most damaging examples being diseases of crops and livestock. Therefore, Europe is solving these problems with various projects that address the spread of invasive plant species, their impact on the environment, the consequences, and the controls to measure the impact.
As the paper presents the European invasive plants in paper production, the spread, measurement and control of the spread of these plants is regulated by the European Commission Regulation 1143/2014 on invasive alien species [2]. Namely, the provisions of IAPS EU include prevention, early detection and rapid eradication, and management to prevent the spread of the species and minimize the damage it can cause.
Species that have been investigated by many researchers are Acacia melanoxylon [4], Alternanthera philoxeroides (weed) [5], Arundo donax (cane) [6], Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) [7], Eichhornia crassipes (common water hyacinth) [8][9], Fallopias spp. [10][11], Hedychium coronarium (white ginger lily) [12], Miscanthus sinensis [13][14][15][16], Pittosporum undulatum [17], Solidago canadensis (Canadian goldenrod) [18], Spartina alterniflora (cordgrass) [19], Triadica sebifera (Chinese tallow) [20], Ulex europaeus (gorse) [21]. Regarding the use of invasive alien plants, studies on the production of paper and packaging materials have been conducted with Japanese Knotweed, Goldenrod, and Black Locust [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Feedstocks from different biomasses such as crops and invasive alien plants are therefore gaining increasing interest.

2. Overview of the Various IAPS in Europe for Paper Production

Classical paper substrates are usually made of mechanical or chemical pulp, using different proportions of hardwood and/or softwood fibers with additives such as retention agents, fillers, binders and so on [31]. In addition to hardwood and softwood fibers, invasive plants can also be used as a fiber source for paper production.
Isolated cellulose fibers from invasive plant biomass have been used in films and fiberboards [29]. Much research has also been conducted on the application of cellulose fibers derived from invasive plant biomass for conventional paper products and their finishing [26][27][28][30][32].
The IAPS presented, such as Knotweed, Goldenrod, and Black Locust, are the most invasive plant species in Europe used in paper production and are therefore presented in more detail in the following subsections.

2.1. Knotweed

The Knotweed family (Polygonaceae) comprises about 40 genera [28]. As Lavoie points out in his review, invasive Knotweed has significant negative impacts on native plants, while the abundant litter produced and deep rhizome system alters soil chemistry to the invaders’ advantage. The most invasive plants from this plant family in Europe are Fallopia japonica, Fallopia sachalinensis, Fallopia x bohemica, and hybrids between Fallopia japonica and Fallopia sachalinensis. All the above species also differ in the type of leaves and flowers they possess (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Japanese Knotweed with leaves and flowers.
In East Asia, Japan, China, etc., Fallopia japonica is native and was introduced into the Dutch botanical garden in 1823 as an interesting plant [4]. Later these plants were cultivated in various places in Europe as ornamental and bee pasture plants with autumn flowers. Over the years, the plants spread throughout Europe and now pose a threat to the natural ecosystem and biodiversity. Nevertheless, Knotweed is an edible plant that contains many medicinal compounds that have been isolated and identified by many researchers [28][33][34][35][36]. It is a rich source of resveratrol, an antioxidant with antibacterial properties. The extracts have been used to dye textiles and improve antimicrobial activity [37][38][39].

2.2. Goldenrod

Goldenrods (i.e., Canadian goldenrod—Solidago canadensis—and Giant goldenrod—Solidago gigantea) originated in the North of America and can also be found in Europe and Asia. The aforementioned plants are also invasive and can spread locally via rhizomes with large wind-borne seeds [40].
The aforementioned species have a similar habit and grow from 30 to almost 300 cm tall. The stems are unbranched, except in the inflorescence. The leaves are stalkless and three-veined (Figure 2). The inflorescences form broad pyramidal panicles with recurved branches and a central axis. The ray florets are yellow, female, and fertile, while the disk florets are bisexual and fertile. Both species occur in the same habitat types, such as disturbed areas, railroad and road sides, riverbanks, urban and peri-urban areas, agricultural areas, plantations and orchards, forests, and meadows [28].
Figure 2. Goldenrod with leaves and flowers.
There are differences in plant morphology, phytochemical profiles, and bioactivity between the European native species Solidago virgaurea and the invasive alien species Solidargo canadensis and Solidargo gigantea. The main differences are in the number of chemical compounds antimicrobial, antimutagenic, and antioxidant properties [41]. While the generally accepted trends and strategies regarding invasive plant species are to limit or eliminate the invaders, some research groups following bioeconomy principles are investigating potential uses of invasive Solidago species and attempting to convert wastes into valuable products.
Following Radušiene’s research on the importance of goldenrod to the environment, a new approach has recently been developed to use invasive species as a potential source of value-added products, rather than eliminating them using labor-intensive and environmentally damaging methods. The high biomass produced by exotic goldenrod is a promising source of renewable energy that can be used in rural households as an alternative to expensive firewood and that does not compete with food or feed crops [42].
According to the research of Patel et al., canadensis contains interesting components in all parts of the plant: essential oils with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, natural dyes for dyeing textiles, extracted substances with algicidal, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, stems for cellulose blends, and plant residues for the production of heating pellets and biofuel [43][44].

2.3. Black Locust

Black Locust, or Robinia pseudoacacia L., is considered controversial in Europe because it was deliberately planted in this region (Figure 3). It was introduced to Europe from North America in the early 17th century. It was introduced to Europe from North America in the 17th century. It was planted as an ornamental tree in parks and gardens, but was also used to produce firewood, as a leaf food for animals, as a nectar source for bees, to produce waterproof wood, and to control soil erosion [45][46]. Nowadays, this plant covers more than 2.3 million ha with an area of at least 100,000 ha in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Serbia, and Ukraine [33][34][35][36][47][48][49][50].
Figure 3. Black Locust with leaves and flowers.
Research and studies have shown that the flowers contain flavonoids, condensed tannins, polysaccharides, and essential oil, which have antimicrobial activity against foodborne pathogens [51][52][53].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/fib10110094


  1. Cepi Report. Available online: (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  2. EU 2022: European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment; Sundseth, K. Invasive Alien Species: A European Union Response, Publications Office, 2017. Available online: (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  3. Conway, T.M.; Almas, A.D.; Coore, D. Ecosystem services, ecological integrity, and native species planting: How to balance these ideas in urban forest management? Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 41, 1–5.
  4. Chemetova, C.; Ribeiro, H.; Fabião, A.; Gominho, J. Towards sustainable valorisation of Acacia melanoxylon biomass: Characterization of mature and juvenile plant tissues. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110090.
  5. Fan, S.; Yu, D.; Liu, C. The invasive plant Alternanthera philoxeroides was suppressed more intensively than its native congener by a native generalist: Implications for the biotic resistance hypothesis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83619.
  6. Martínez-Sanz, M.; Erboz, E.; Fontes, C.; López-Rubio, A. Valorization of Arundo donax for the production of high performance lignocellulosic films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 199, 276–285.
  7. Ziska, L.H.; Reeves, J.B., III; Blank, B. The impact of recent increases in atmospheric CO2 on biomass production and vegetative retention of Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum): Implications for fire disturbance. Glob. Change Biol. 2005, 11, 1325–1332.
  8. Ruan, T.; Zeng, R.; Yin, X.Y.; Zhang, S.X.; Yang, Z.H. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) biomass as a biofuel feedstock by enzymatic hydrolysis. BioResources 2016, 11, 2372–2380.
  9. Pintor-Ibarra, L.F.; Rivera-Prado, J.J.; Ngangyo-Heya, M.; Rutiaga-Quiñones, J.G. Evaluation of the chemical components of Eichhornia crassipes as an alternative raw material for pulp and paper. BioResources 2018, 13, 2800–2813.
  10. Hromádková, Z.; Hirsch, J.; Ebringerová, A. Chemical evaluation of Fallopia species leaves and antioxidant properties of their non-cellulosic polysaccharides. Chem. Pap. 2010, 64, 663–672.
  11. Claeson, S.M.; LeRoy, C.J.; Barry, J.R.; Kuehn, K.A. Impacts of invasive riparian knotweed on litter decomposition, aquatic fungi, and macroinvertebrates. Biol. Invasions 2014, 16, 1531–1544.
  12. Saulino, H.H.L.; Trivinho-Strixino, S. Native macrophyte leaves influence more specialisation of neotropical shredder chironomids than invasive macrophyte leaves. Hydrobiologia 2018, 813, 189–198.
  13. Kordsachia, O.; Seemann, A.; Patt, R. Fast growing poplar and Miscanthus sinensis—Future raw materials for pulping in Central Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 1993, 5, 137–143.
  14. Serrano, L.; Egües, I.; Alriols, M.G.; Llano-Ponte, R.; Labidi, J. Miscanthus sinensis fractionation by different reagents. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 49–55.
  15. Barba, C.; de la Rosa, A.; Vidal, T.; Colom, J.F.; Farriol, X.; Montané, D. TCF bleached pulps from Miscanthus sinensis by the impregnation rapid steam pulping (IRSP) process. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2002, 22, 249–266.
  16. Iglesias, G.; Bao, M.; Lamas, J.; Vega, A. Soda pulping of Miscanthus sinensis. Effects of operational variables on pulp yield and lignin solubilization. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 58, 17–23.
  17. Silva, L.B.; Lourenço, P.; Teixeira, A.; Azevedo, E.B.; Alves, M.; Elias, R.B.; Silva, L. Biomass valorization in the management of woody plant invaders: The case of Pittosporum undulatum in the Azores. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 109, 155–165.
  18. Liu, Y.; Bekele, L.D.; Lu, X.; Zhang, W.; Yu, C.; Duns, G.J.; Joseph, G.D.; Jin, L.; Chen, J. The effect of lignocellulose filler on mechanical properties of filled-high density polyethylene composites loaded with biomass of an invasive plant solidago canadensis. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2017, 11, 34–39.
  19. Ren, G.B.; Wang, J.J.; Wang, A.D.; Wang, J.B.; Zhu, Y.L.; Wu, P.Q.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, J. Monitoring the invasion of smooth cordgrass Spartina alterniflora within the modern Yellow River Delta using remote sensing. J. Coast. Res. 2019, 90, 135–145.
  20. Picou, L.; Boldor, D. Thermophysical characterization of the seeds of invasive Chinese tallow tree: Importance for biofuel production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 11435–11442.
  21. Pesenti, H.; Torres, M.; Oliveira, P.; Gacitua, W.; Leoni, M. Exploring Ulex europaeus to produce nontoxic binderless fibreboard. BioResources 2017, 12, 2660–2672.
  22. Kavčič, U.; Karlovits, I. Invasive plant-based paper as a substrate for electroconductive printing inks. Adv. Print. Media Technol. 2019, 46, 165–170.
  23. Karlovits, I.; Kavčič, U.; Lavrič, G.; Šinkovec, A.; Zorić, V. Digital printability of papers made from invasive plants and agro-industrial residues. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2020, 54, 523–529.
  24. Selič, P.; Mavrić, Z.; Možina, K. Comparison of print quality on papers from invasive alien plants species. DAAAM Int. Sci. Book 2020, 49–60.
  25. Karlovits, I.; Kavčič, U. Flexo printability of agro and invasive papers. Cellulose 2022, 29, 4613–4627.
  26. Kavčič, U.; Karlovits, I. The influence of process parameters of screen-printed invasive plant paper electrodes on cyclic voltammetry. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2020, 35, 299–307.
  27. Karlovits, I.; Lavrič, G.; Kavčič, U.; Zorić, V. Electrophotography toner adhesion on agro-industrial residue and invasive plant papers. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2021, 35, 2636–2651.
  28. Starešinič, M.; Boh Podgornik, B.; Javoršek, D.; Leskovšek, M.; Možina, K. Fibers obtained from invasive alien plant species as a base material for paper production. Forests 2021, 12, 527.
  29. Kapun, T.; Zule, J.; Fabjan, E.; Hočevar, B.; Grilc, M.; Likozar, B. Engineered invasive plant cellulose fibers as resources for papermaking. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2022, 80, 501–514.
  30. Sežun, M.; Karlovits, I.; Kavčič, U. Chemical and Enzymatic Deinking Efficiency of Agro And Industrial Waste Fiber-Based Paper Packaging. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 1–8.
  31. Todorova, D.; Yavorov, N.; Lasheva, V. Improvement of barrier properties for packaging applications. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 27, 100685.
  32. Corcelli, F.; Ripa, M.; Ulgiati, S. Efficiency and sustainability indicators for papermaking from virgin pulp—An emergy-based case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 131, 313–328.
  33. Sitzia, T.; Cierjacks, A.; De Rigo, D.; Caudullo, G. Robinia pseudoacacia in Europe: Distribution, habitat, usage and threats. Eur. Atlas For. Tree Species 2016, 166–167. Available online: (accessed on 11 June 2022).
  34. Redei, K.; Nicolescu, V.N.; Vor, T.; Potzelsberger, E.; Bastien, J.C.; Brus, R.; Bencat, T.; Đodan, M.; Cvjetković, B.; Andrašev, S.; et al. Ecology and management of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), a non-native tree species integrated in European forests and landscapes. J. For. Res. 2020, 31, 1081–1101.
  35. Nicolescu, V.N.; Hernea, C.; Bakti, B.; Keserű, Z.; Antal, B.; Rédei, K. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) as a multi-purpose tree species in Hungary and Romania: A review. J. For. Res. 2018, 29, 1449–1463.
  36. Campoy, J.G.; Acosta, A.T.; Affre, L.; Barreiro, R.; Brundu, G.; Buisson, E.; Gonzales, L.; Lema, M.; Novoa, A.; Fagúndez, J.; et al. Monographs of invasive plants in Europe: Carpobrotus. Bot. Lett. 2018, 165, 440–475.
  37. Verbič, A.; Brenčič, K.; Primc, G.; Gorjanc, M. Importance of protocol design for suitable green in situ synthesis of ZnO on cotton using aqueous extract of japanese knotweed leaves as reducing agent. Forests 2022, 13, 143.
  38. Naumoska, K.; Jug, U.; Kõrge, K.; Oberlintner, A.; Golob, M.; Novak, U.; Vovk, I.; Likozar, B. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Biofoil Based on Chitosan and Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia japonica, Houtt.) Rhizome Bark Extract. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1200.
  39. Klančnik, M. Screen printing with natural dye extract from Japanese knotweed rhizome. Fibers Polym. 2021, 22, 2498–2506.
  40. Bielecka, A.; Królak, E. Selected features of canadian goldenrod that predispose the plant to phytoremediation. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 88–93.
  41. Gala-Czekaj, D.; Dziurka, M.; Bocianowski, J.; Synowiec, A. Autoallelopathic potential of aqueous extracts from Canadian goldenrod (Solidago canadensis L.) and giant goldenrod (S. gigantea Aiton). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2022, 44, 1–12.
  42. Radušienė, J.; Karpavičienė, B.; Marksa, M.; Ivanauskas, L.; Raudonė, L. Distribution Patterns of Essential Oil Terpenes in Native and Invasive Solidago Species and Their Comparative Assessment. Plants 2022, 11, 1159.
  43. Patel, N.; Zihare, L.; Blumberga, D. Evaluation of bioresources validation. Agron. Res. 2021, 19, 1099–1111.
  44. Baranová, B.; Troščáková-Kerpčárová, E.; Gruľová, D. Survey of the Solidago canadensis L. Morphological Traits and Essential Oil Production: Aboveground Biomass Growth and Abundance of the Invasive Goldenrod Appears to Be Reciprocally Enhanced within the Invaded Stands. Plants 2022, 11, 535.
  45. Spyroglou, G.; Fotelli, M.; Nanos, N.; Radoglou, K. Assessing Black Locust Biomass Accumulation in Restoration Plantations. Forests 2021, 12, 1477.
  46. Środek, D.; Rahmonov, O. The properties of Black Locust Robinia pseudoacacia L. to selectively accumulate chemical elements from soils of ecologically transformed areas. Forests 2021, 13, 7.
  47. Chauvel, B.; Fried, G.; Follak, S.; Chapman, D.; Kulakova, Y.; Le Bourgeois, T.; Marisavlijevic, D.; Monty, A.; Rossi, J.-P.; Regnier, E.; et al. Monographs on invasive plants in Europe N° 5: Ambrosia trifida L. Botany Lett. 2021, 168, 167–190.
  48. Bahor, B.; Klopčič, M. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in Bela krajina: Distribution, growth, regeneration and management. Acta Silvae Ligni 2019, 13–28. Available online: (accessed on 6 July 2022).
  49. Kuneš, I.; Baláš, M.; Gallo, J.; Šulitka, M.; Suraweera, C. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and its role in central Europe and Czech Republic. Zprávy Lesn. Výzkumu 2019, 64, 181–190.
  50. Alilla, R.; De Natale, F.; Epifani, C.; Parisse, B.; Cola, G. The Flowering of Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in Italy: A Phenology Modeling Approach. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1623.
  51. Lange, C.A.; Knoche, D.; Hanschke, R.; Löffler, S.; Schneck, V. Physiological Performance and Biomass Growth of Different Black Locust Origins Growing on a Post-Mining Reclamation Site in Eastern Germany. Forests 2022, 13, 315.
  52. Vítková, M.; Conedera, M.; Sádlo, J.; Pergl, J.; Pyšek, P. Dangerous and useful at the same time: Management strategies for the invasive black locust. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 2018, 169, 77–85.
  53. Żelazna, A.; Kraszkiewicz, A.; Przywara, A.; Łagód, G.; Suchorab, Z.; Werle, S.; Ballester, J.; Nosek, R. Life cycle assessment of production of black locust logs and straw pellets for energy purposes. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, 163–170.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!