Non-Coding RNAs in Renal Fibrosis

Non-Coding RNAs in Renal Fibrosis: History

Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Subjects: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Contributor: Cynthia Van der Hauwaert ,

François Glowacki

, Nicolas Pottier , Christelle Cauffiez

Fibrosis, or tissue scarring, is defined as the excessive, persistent and destructive accumulation of extracellular matrix components in response to chronic tissue injury. Renal fibrosis represents the final stage of most chronic kidney diseases and contributes to the progressive and irreversible decline in kidney function. Recently, the role of non-coding RNAs, and in particular microRNAs (miRNAs), has been described in kidney fibrosis.

non-coding RNAs
microRNAs
long non-coding RNAs
renal fibrosis
biomarkers
therapeutics targets

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognized as a major public health concern. CKD prevalence has been estimated to be 8–16% worldwide [1]. In particular, CKD has been evaluated to affect more than 10% of the western population [2]. The common feature of CKD is renal fibrosis, which contributes to the progressive and irreversible decline in renal function and is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Renal fibrosis, defined as an aberrant wound healing process in response to chronic injury, is characterized by the progressive and persistent accumulation of extracellular matrix components (ECM) in the kidney, ultimately leading to renal failure. As tissue scarring affects all compartments of the kidney, renal fibrosis is typically associated with glomerulosclerosis, arteriosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis [2]. Disruption of the epithelium and/or endothelium integrity during injury results in the activation of a complex cascade of molecular and cellular events. First, an inflammatory response initiates the release of profibrotic cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, which in turn promotes the proliferative phase of the scarring process characterized in particular by the recruitment and activation of fibroblasts into ECM-secreting myofibroblasts [3,4]. Finally, ECM accumulation results in the formation of a permanent fibrotic scar associated with renal tissue remodeling [5]. Once deposited, ECM components are further cross-linked and acquire resistance properties to degradation, precluding fibrosis resolution [6].

Although histological analysis of renal biopsies represents the gold standard to evaluate fibrosis, indirect biological parameters such as evolution of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate are widely used in clinical practice for monitoring the progression of fibrotic lesions [7,8]. Furthermore, no specific treatment directly targeting fibrosis is currently approved [2]. Therefore, identifying new therapeutic targets and innovative diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers remains critical.

Recently, among the various mechanisms triggering fibrogenesis, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as important regulators of this deleterious process [9,10,11,12,13].

2. Non-Coding RNAs

New high-throughput technologies have revolutionized our understanding of the genome. Indeed, transcriptome of higher eukaryotic organism is far more complex than anticipated and contains large amounts of RNA molecules without coding potential (only 2% mRNAs in humans). Besides transfer and ribosomal RNAs that have been known since the 1950s, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) form a large and heterogenous class of RNA species involved in the regulation of gene expression. Non-coding RNAs are classified according to their length, localization and/or function into long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) (Figure 1) [14,15,16,17]. Given that the role of some classes of ncRNAs (including siRNAs, snoRNAs or piRNAs) in kidney fibrosis remains largely unknown, this review will be restricted to miRNAs and lncRNAs.

Figure 1. Classification and function of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs).

2.1. microRNAs (miRNAs)

miRNAs are ncRNAs of about 22 nucleotides usually conserved between species and involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Currently, about 2700 mature miRNAs have been identified in humans, regulating at least 60% of mRNAs (miRbase v.22.1, October 2018 [18]). As miRNAs are involved in a vast array of physiological processes, such as embryogenesis, cellular homeostasis and differentiation [19]. Their aberrant expression plays a causative role in most complex disorders such as cancer, cardio-vascular diseases and fibro-proliferative disorders [20,21,22,23].

About 60% of miRNAs are localized in intergenic regions and possess their own transcriptional unit [24]. Other miRNAs are localized in intron of coding genes and are either co-transcribed with their host genes or under the control of a specific promoter [25,26]. miRNAs are usually transcribed by RNA polymerase II into a primary transcript, termed pri-miRNA. This pri-miRNA is then processed into a pre-miRNA of about 70 nucleotides by a multiproteic complex, called microprocessor and composed of two subunits: The RNAse III endonuclease DROSHA and the RNA binding protein DGCR8 (DiGiorge Critical Region 8). The pre-miRNA is recognized by EXP5 (Exportin 5)-Ran-GTP and exported to the cytoplasm. The last step of maturation is catalyzed by the RNAse III DICER associated with TRBP (TAR RNA binding protein). The PAZ domain (PIWI-AGOZWILLE) of the complex allows the recognition and positioning of DICER, then the RNAse III domain cleaves the pre-miRNA loop, generating a 22-nucleotide miRNA duplex [27]. The association with an Argonaute protein into the RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) allows the dissociation of the duplex [28]. The passenger strand (termed miRNA*) is then cleaved and released into the cytoplasm for degradation [29] whereas the guide strand, or mature miRNA, persists within RISC [30]. When both strands lead to a mature miRNA, they are identified by the suffix -3p or -5p depending on whether they come from the 3′or 5′ end of their precursor.

By preferentially binding on specific sequences, called “seed” sequences, which are mainly localized in the mRNA 3’-UTR (UnTranslated Region), mature miRNAs induce the degradation of the target mRNAs if miRNA-mRNA complementarity is perfect. However, this mechanism is minor in animals. Indeed, in the majority of cases, miRNAs regulate the expression levels of their target mRNAs by the recruitment of protein partners responsible for the activation of de-adenylation and de-capping associated with the 5′-to-3′ decay of mRNAs and possibly to translational repression mechanisms [30].

2.2. Long Non-Coding RNAs (lncRNAs)

In the human genome, about 30,000 lncRNA transcripts have been identified to date (GENCODE v29, [31]). LncRNAs, which are defined by being larger than 200 nucleotides, share common features with mRNAs, including being transcribed by RNA polymerase II, capped, cleaved, spliced, and polyadenylated [32,33].

LncRNA members are a heterogeneous family that can be subdivided according to their biogenesis loci into intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs), intronic lncRNAs, antisense lncRNAs (aslncRNA or natural antisense transcripts, NATs), bidirectional lncRNAs, and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) [34,35,36,37] (Figure 2). Their functions are still poorly explored due to their subcellular localization [34] and their tissue- and temporal-specific expression [38]. Moreover, the low conservation of lncRNAs between species is a major obstacle to their identification and characterization in animal models [39]. Nevertheless, lncRNAs have been shown to display wide-ranging functions, probably due to their ability to bind to either DNA, RNA or protein. In particular, seminal functional studies have demonstrated their important role in the modulation of gene expression or DNA remodeling in physiological and pathological processes [32].

Figure 2. Classification of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) according to their genomic location. (a) Intergenic lncRNAs are located between two coding genes; (b) intronic lncRNAs are transcribed entirely from introns of protein-coding genes; (c) antisense lncRNAs are transcribed from the antisense strand of a coding gene and overlap at least one exon; (d) bidirectional lncRNAs are localized within 1 kb of the promoter of a coding gene and oriented in the other direction; (e) enhancer lncRNAs are located in enhancer regions associated with a coding gene. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription.

3. miRNAs Implicated in Renal Fibrosis

Among the various classes of ncRNAs, miRNAs have first retained the attention of the scientific community. Many studies that focused on miRNAs in renal fibrosis have been published and allowed the identification of about thirty miRNAs with either an anti-fibrotic or pro-fibrotic effect, also called “fibromiRs” [4,40]. While Table 1 outlines publications highlighting the major role of miRNAs in renal fibrosis, we will describe more precisely the role of few particularly well-characterized miRNAs.

Table 1. Summary of miRNAs involved in renal fibrosis.

Regulation	miRNA	Models	Gene Target	References
Up	miR-21	Renal tissues from kidney transplanted patients Renal tissues from patients with IgA nephropathy Renal tissues from patients with Alport Syndrome UUO mouse model DN mouse model Ichemia reperfusion mouse model RPTEC cells Mesangial cells	PTEN, SMAD7, PPARA, PDCD4, BCL2, PHD2, MKK3, RECK, TIMP3, THSP1, RAB11A	[41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]
	miR-22	DN rat model RPTEC cells	PTEN	[64]
	miR-135a	Serum and renal tissues from patients with DN DN mouse model Mesangial cells	TRPC1	[65]
	miR-150	renal tissue from patients with lupus nephritis RPTEC cells Mesangial cells	SOCS1	[66]
	miR-155	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells	PDE3A	[67,68]
	miR-184	UUO mouse models RPTEC cells	HIF1AN	[69]
	miR-214	UUO mouse model DN mouse model RPTEC cells Mesangial cells	DKK3, CDH1, PTEN	[70,71,72]
	miR-215	DN mouse model Mesangial cells	CTNNBIP1	[73]
	miR-216a	DN mouse model Mesangial cells	YBX1	[74]
	miR-324	Rat model of nephropathy (Munich Wistar Fromter rats) RPTEC cells	PREP	[75]
	miR-433	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells	AZIN1	[76]
	miR-1207	RPTEC cells Mesangial cells	G6PD, PMEPAI1, PDK1, SMAD7	[77]
Down	let-7 family	DN mouse model RPTEC cells	HMGA2, TGFBR1	[78,79]
	miR-29 family	UUO mouse model Adenine gavage in mice Chronic renal failure rat model (5/6e nephrectomy) DN mouse model RPTEC cells Endothelial cells Podcytes HEK293 treated with ochratoxin A	COL, FN1, AGT, ADAM12, ADAM19, PIK3R2	[80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]
	miR-30	Renal tissues from kidney transplanted patients UUO mouse model DN mouse model RPTEC cells	CTGF, KLF11, UCP2	[89,90,91]
	miR-34 family	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells	NOTCH1/JAG1	[92]
	miR-152	RPTEC cells	HPIP	[93]
	miR-181	UUO mouse model	EGR1	[94]
	miR-194	Ischemia reperfusion mouse model RPTEC cells	RHEB	[95]
	miR-200 family	UUO mouse model Adenine gavage in mice RPTEC cells	ZEB1/2, ETS1	[96,97,98,99,100,101,102]
	miR-455	DN rat model RPTEC cells Mesangial cells	ROCK2	[103]
Down/Up (controversial)	miR-192	UUO mouse model DN mouse model IgA nephropathy mouse model RPTEC cells	ZEB1/2	[104,105,106,107,108,109]

Abbreviations: UUO (ureteral unilateral obstruction); RPTEC (renal proximal tubular epithelial cells); DN (diabetic nephropathy).

4. Long Non-Coding RNAs Implicated in Renal Fibrosis

Even if elucidation of the role of lncRNAs is still ongoing, it is now accepted that besides their involvement in physiological processes such as organ development, immunity or homeostasis, their modulation can occur in chronic multifactorial diseases [35].

In the context of fibrosis, few examples showing their pro-fibrotic role have been documented, such as MALAT1 in cardiac fibrosis, H19 and DNM3os in lung fibrosis, and MALAT1, lnc-LFAR1 and HIF1A-AS1 in liver fibrosis [120,121,122,123,124,125^[1]^[2]]. Although studies about lncRNAs and renal fibrosis are quite recent, their number has significantly increased in recent years. In particular, emerging data show that various lncRNAs are involved in renal fibrosis by playing a pro- or anti-fibrotic role (Table 2). Although many studies have shown a deregulation of lncRNA expression, we chose to only focus on mechanistic studies.

Table 2. LncRNAs involved in kidney fibrosis.

Regulation	lncRNA	Models	Functions/Mechanisms	Consequences	References
Up	LOC105375913	Renal tissue of patients with segmental glomeruloscleoris RPTEC cells	Binding to miR-27b and leading to Snail expression	Pro-fibrotic	[126]
	LINC00667	Renal tissue of patients with chronic renal failure Chronic renal failure rat model (partial nephrectomy) RPTEC cells	Binding to Ago2, targeting miR-19b-3p	Pro-fibrotic	[127]
	NEAT1	DN rat model Mesangial cells		Pro-fibrotic and increase of proliferation	[128]
	Lnc-TSI (AP000695.6 or ENST00000429588.1)	RPTEC cells UUO mouse model Ischemia-reperfusion mouse model Renal tissue of patients with IgA nephropathy	Synergic binding to Smad3	Anti-fibrotic	[129]
	HOTAIR	UUO rat model RPTEC cells	Acting as a ceRNA with miR-124: activation of Jagged1/Nocth1 signaling	Pro-fibrotic	[130,131]
	LINC00963	Chronic renal failure rat model (5/6e nephrectomy)	Inhibition of FoxO signaling pathway by targeting FoxO3a	Pro-fibrotic	[132]
	TCONS_00088786	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells	Possibly regulation of miR-132 expression	Pro-fibrotic	[133]
	Errb4-IR (np-5318)	UUO mouse model Anti GBM mouse model RPTEC cells DN mouse model Mesangial cells	Downstream of TGFb/Smad3 pathway by binding Smad7 gene Binding to miR-29b	Pro-fibrotic	[134,135,136]
	CHCHD4P4	Stone kidney mouse model RPTEC cells		Pro-fibrotic	[137]
	TCONS_00088786	UUO rat model RPTEC cells		Pro-fibrotic	[138]
	TCONS_01496394	UUO rat model RPTEC cells		Pro-fibrotic	[138]
	ASncmtRNA-2	DN mouse model Mesangial cells		Pro-fibrotic	[139]
	LincRNA-Gm4419	DN mouse model Mesangial cells	Activation of NFkB/NLRP3 pathway by interacting with p50	Pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory	[140,141]
	H19	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells	Acting as a ceRNA with miR-17 and fibronectin mRNA	Pro-fibrotic	[142]
	RP23.45G16.5	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells		Pro-fibrotic	[143]
	AI662270	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells		No significative effect	[143]
	Arid2-IR (np-28496)	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells	Smad3 binding site in Arid2-IR promoter Promoting NF-κB signaling	Pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory effects	[144]
	np-17856	UUO mouse model Glomerulonephritis mouse model	Smad3 binding site	Pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory	[134]
	NR_033515	Serum of patients with diabetic nephropathy Mesangial cells	Targeting miR-743b-5p	Pro-fibrotic and promotes proliferation	[145]
	MALAT1	DN mouse model Podocytes	Binding to SRSF1 Targeting byβ-catenin	Pro-fibrotic	[146]
	Gm5524	DN mouse model Podocytes		Autophagy increase and apoptosis decrease	[147]
	WISP1-AS1	RPTEC cells	Modulating ochratoxin-A-induced Egr-1 and E2F activities	Cell viability increase	[148]
Down	Gm15645	DN mouse model Podocytes		Autophagy decrease and apoptosis increase	[147]
	CYP4B1-PS1-001 (ENSMUST00000118753)	DN mouse model Mesangial cells	Enhancing ubiquitination and degradation of nucleolin	Anti-fibrotic and anti-proliferative	[149,150]
	3110045C21Rik	UUO mouse model RPTEC cells		Anti-fibrotic	[143]
	ENSMUST00000147869	DN mouse model Mesangial cells	Associated with Cyp4a12a	Anti-fibrotic and anti-proliferative	[151]
	lincRNA 1700020I24Rik (ENSMUSG00000085438)	DN mouse model Mesangial cells	Binding to miR-34a-5p. Inhibition of Sirt1/ HIF-1α signal pathway by targeting miR-34a-5p.	Anti-fibrotic	[152]
	MEG3	RPTEC cells		Anti-fibrotic	[153]
	ZEB1-AS1	DN mouse model RPTEC cells	Promoting Zeb1 expression by binding H3K4 Methyltransferase MLL1	Anti-fibrotic	[154]
	ENST00000453774.1	Renal tissue of patients with renal fibrosis UUO mouse model RPTEC cells		Anti-fibrotic	[155]

Note: Studies in bold are mechanistic studies. Abbreviations: UUO (ureteral unilateral obstruction); RPTEC (renal proximal tubular epithelial cells); DN (diabetic nephropathy)

5. New Therapeutic Targets and Innovative Biomarkers

5.1. New Therapeutic Targets

To date, the lack of specific anti-fibrotic therapies remains a critical need in clinical practice. As ncRNAs are involved in many critical pathogenic processes driving renal fibrosis, they represent attractive therapeutic targets. Currently, two strategies can be applied to manipulate ncRNA expression levels: The first relies on restoring the expression of a ncRNA when its level is decreased, the second is related to inhibiting the function of a ncRNA when its expression is increased.

5.1.1. miRNAs as Therapeutic Targets

To restore miRNA function, miRNA mimics or pre-miRNA have been developed. A modified synthetic RNA is introduced into cells as a duplex consisting of one strand identical to the mature miRNA of interest (guide strand) and the second antisense strand with a lower stability [159]. In addition, chemical modifications such as 2′-Fluoro bases have been developed to increase the stability of the guide strand without interfering with the RISC complex [160]. Other modifications include the use of 5′-O-methyl bases on the second strand to limit its incorporation into RISC complex [161]. Finally, addition of cholesterol-like molecules improves the duplex cellular internalization [159]. Although the use of such tools is widely developed for in vitro models, their application in vivo is hampered by delivery [11]. Other approaches involved gene therapy techniques, using notably AAV-mediated miRNA delivery (adeno-associated virus). Indeed, AAVs allow the restoration of the physiological expression level of miRNA with low toxicity and without integration into the genome in a specific tissue or cellular type [159,162].

Such strategies have been successfully applied in preclinical mouse models of tissue fibrosis, including bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, but still need to be evaluated in the context of kidney fibrosis [163]. The renal tissue is indeed accessible to AAV gene delivery by different routes, including injection through the renal artery, injection into the parenchyma and retrograde injection via the ureter.

Concerning miRNA inhibition, several strategies have been developed, especially antisense oligonucleotides (termed antimiRs) which are widely used in preclinical models of tissue fibrosis and have also entered clinical trials [164]. These molecules are also chemically modified in order to improve their affinity, pharmacokinetics, stability and cellular entrance. The major modifications include the addition on the ribose of particular groups such as 2′O-Methyl, 2′O-Methoxyethyl or 2′-Fluoro and also inclusion of bicyclic structures which lock the ribose into its preferred 3′ endo conformation and increase base-pairing affinity such as methylene bridging group, also known as LNA (locked nucleic acid). Such ribose modifications allow a reduction in the size of antimiRs without loss of affinity and specificity. Finally, backbone modifications such as phosphorothioate linkages or the addition of morpholino structures enhance nuclease resistance [165].

Finally, target site blockers (TSB) inhibit miRNA function by specifically preventing interaction between a miRNA and its target [166,167]. One advantage of this strategy relies on its specificity, as it does not affect expression of the other target genes, and thus reduces the risk of side effects.

In the context of renal fibrosis, proof-of-concept for miRNA targeting has been demonstrated for several fibromiRs. In particular, results indicated that miR-214 antagonism was associated with less fibrotic lesions in the UUO mouse model [116]. In addition, an miR-21 antagonism injection prevented fibrotic injuries in UUO [42], diabetic nephropathy [168] or Alport [169] mouse models. Moreover, Regulus Therapeutics has developed a phase II clinical trial with a miR-21 antagonist in patients with Alport syndrome (RG-012; Regulus Therapeutics Inc.; clinical trial: NCT02855268). This drug candidate has currently received the orphan drug status from the FDA and the European Commission for the treatment of this rare disease.

5.1.2. lncRNAs as Therapeutic Targets

LncRNA deregulation is also viewed as an important driver of renal fibrosis, suggesting their potential value as therapeutic targets. Given their extensive secondary structures and their localization in nuclear and/or cytoplasmic compartments [15,34], pharmacological modulation of lncRNAs is more complex and, until recently, the options for targeting lncRNAs were limited. Moreover, the low conservation of lncRNAs between species is a major obstacle for preclinical validation [39,170]. However, recently, conceptual and technological advances in antisense oligonucleotide therapy offer new pharmacological options to modulate the expression or the function of lncRNAs. For example, the development of technologies including GapmeR-mediated lncRNA silencing, CRISPR inhibition or aptamers directed against lncRNA secondary structure represent novel opportunities to improve lncRNA knowledge and clinical translation [171].

In the context of renal fibrosis, lncRNA modulation remains an almost unexplored area. However, Kato et al. have used GapmeRs, an antisense oligonucleotide technology that induces target degradation in the nuclear compartment by recruiting RNAse H [172], in a mouse model of diabetic nephropathy. Interestingly, injection of such GapmeRs against lnc-MGG induced a decreased expression of profibrotic genes (TGF-β1, Col1a2, Col4a1, Ctgf) and prevented glomerular fibrosis, podocyte death and hypertrophy in diabetic mice [173]. Otherwise, few studies have investigated the opportunity to downregulate lncRNA expression using short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) by delivery of plasmids or through viral or bacterial vectors in vivo [174]. Indeed, targeting of Errb4-IR was shown to improve renal fibrosis in the db/db mouse model [136]. Moreover, in a UUO mouse model, Arid2-IR was also successfully inhibited by a shRNA [144].

6. Biomarkers

Histological examination of biopsied tissue is considered the reference method for the diagnosis and staging of kidney fibrosis [8]. However, as percutaneous tissue sampling of either native kidney or allograft remains associated with patient discomfort, risk for complications, histopathological interpretation variability and high cost [175], the development of alternative non-invasive diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers is an important clinical issue [176]. Interestingly, ncRNAs that have been extensively reported to be dysregulated in fibrotic tissues, have also been detected in a large panel of human biological fluids including serum, plasma and urine [177,178,179].

6.1. miRNAs

In order to discover relevant biomarkers, miRNA profiling in several biofluids has been performed. Urine is a particularly interesting matrix to explore kidney function, even if miRNAs in urine are less abundant than in plasma or serum, since RNase activity has been reported to be quite high in urine [180]. Cardenas-Gonzalez et al. have screened more than 2000 urinary miRNAs from patients with CKD. In particular, this study demonstrated that downregulation of miR-2861, miR-1915-3p and miR-4532 was associated with a poorer renal function, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in diabetic nephropathy [181]. Another study profiled more than 1800 miRNAs in urine samples from patients with acute kidney injury. Among the 378 detected miRNAs, 19 were upregulated in patients with acute kidney injury, including miR-21, miR-200c and miR-423 [182]. Sonoda et al. showed that miR-9a, miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c and miR-429 from exosomes in rat urine were upregulated following ischemia-reperfusion injury [183]. Moreover, Khurana et al. identified nine upregulated miRNAs (let-7c-5p, miR-222–3p, miR-27a-3p, miR-27b-3p, miR-296-5p, miR-31-5p, miR-3687, miR-6769b-5p and miR-877-3p) and seven downregulated miRNAs (miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-15a-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-34a-5p, miR-181c-5p and miR1-2) in urine exosomes from patients with CKD compared to healthy controls [184]. Finally, other studies showed that dysregulation of urinary miR-29c, miR-21 and miR-200b was correlated with renal fibrotic injuries in patients with CKD or in renal transplanted patients [185,186,187]. Altogether, these data indicate that detection of miRNAs in the urine could reflect the degree of the renal aggression [188].

Finally, miRNAs were also detectable in serum and, more specifically, in renal transplanted patients serum level expression of miR-21 was found to be associated with the severity of renal fibrosis injuries [58,189,190]. While promising, the clinical use of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers remains tempered by quality control and normalization issues. For example, hemolysis needs to be perfectly avoided since miRNAs can be released from blood cells, thus affecting the amount of detected circulating miRNAs [191]. Furthermore, no standard endogenous control to normalize circulating miRNA levels has been clearly established and this concern is still debated [192,193]. The development of new technologies such as digital PCR (dPCR) are particularly interesting as this approach allows an absolute quantification without internal normalization [194,195].

6.2. lncRNAs

Although the expression of many lncRNAs has been evaluated in the context of fibrosis, their validation as biomarkers is at an earlier stage than miRNAs. Nevertheless, identifying novel lncRNAs as biomarkers is of great interest, since lncRNAs are highly stable in biofluids, especially when they are included in exosomes or in apoptotic bodies [179] and could be present in extracellular vesicles [196]. In renal fibrosis, Sun et al. compared the lncRNA profile in renal tissues and urines of UUO rats. Seven lncRNAs (five upregulated and two downregulated) were similarly modulated in renal tissues and urine. In addition, several conserved Smad3 binding motifs were identified in the sequence of the five upregulated lncRNAs [138]. Altogether, these results raise the possibility of using urinary lncRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers of renal fibrosis. Otherwise, Gao et al. found that in the serum of patients with diabetic nephropathy, the upregulation of lncRNA NR_033515 was correlated with NGAL and KIM1 serum levels, and the severity of the disease [145]. While both of these studies highlighted the potential of lncRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for renal fibrosis, further studies are clearly required for the robust identification and validation of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms20081977

References

Sandy Fellah; Romain Larrue; Marin Truchi; Georges Vassaux; Bernard Mari; Christelle Cauffiez; Nicolas Pottier; Pervasive role of the long noncoding RNA DNM3OS in development and diseases. WIREs RNA 2022, e1736, e1736, 10.1002/wrna.1736.
Grégoire Savary; Edmone Dewaeles; Serena Diazzi; Matthieu Buscot; Nicolas Nottet; Julien Fassy; Elisabeth Courcot; Imène-Sarah Henaoui; Julie Lemaire; Nihal Martis; et al. The Long Noncoding RNA DNM3OS Is a Reservoir of FibromiRs with Major Functions in Lung Fibroblast Response to TGF-β and Pulmonary Fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2019, 200, 184-198, 10.1164/rccm.201807-1237oc.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.