Precooling and Cold Storage for Fruits and Vegetables: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Edna Makule
,
Noel Dimoso
,
Savvas A. Tassou

Cold chain systems, such as cold storages, are crucial to minimizing postharvest losses of fresh fruits and vegetables. Cold storage alone cannot prevent crop losses, but should be considered as one component that needs to be integrated into a cold chain network from the point of harvest to the point of purchase by the consumer. Cold chains are still in their infancy in developing countries due to the lack of basic infrastructure and management skills needed to support the development of integrated cold chain systems.

  • cold chain
  • fruits and vegetables
  • postharvest loss
  • food and nutrition security

1. Cooling and Cold Storage of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables

A cold chain for perishable foods can be defined as the uninterrupted handling of the product within a low-temperature surrounding during the postharvest steps of the value chain [1]. After harvest, a food cold chain pathway includes precooling, bulk storage, distribution, retail cooling and household refrigeration before consumption. Although a cold chain does not necessarily have to include all of the aforementioned steps, it must involve at least one of these steps [1]. This section provides an overview of precooling and bulk storage methods for fresh fruits and vegetables.
Bulk cold storage refers to the storage of (large) quantities of produce after production and initial post-production handling. Bulk cooling may take place on farms, at production facilities, at collection/grading centers or at processing facilities. Precooling of products prior to bulk cooling is necessary in order to achieve desired temperature reductions faster than direct integration into bulk storage [2]. Cooling and cold storage require enough starting capital and running costs and reliable electricity supply. These preconditions are often not available to farmers in developing countries. Hence, small-scale farmers have no access to unbroken cold chains and the use of sustainable cold storage facilities [3].
In general, improving cold storage in food value chains provides significant development benefits, such as expanding access to suitable infrastructures and strengthening local management capacities. It also offers environmental protection by reducing waste and carbon emissions, providing efficient use of natural resources and accelerating economic growth through energy and cost savings and increased incomes to rural farmers [2][3][4].

1.1. Precooling Methods for Fruits and Vegetables

Elansari [5] defined precooling as “the removal of field heat from freshly harvested perishable produce in order to slow down metabolism and lower deterioration prior to transport or storage”. Field heat means the difference in temperature between the temperature of harvested produce and the optimal storage temperature of that produce. In addition, field heat should be removed as fast as possible since, for most fresh produce, an hour’s delay at field temperature conditions of 35 °C will lower shelf life to about a day even at optimal storage conditions [6]. Soon after harvest, fresh produce looses more water (through transpiration and respiration), probably due to stress at harvest. Additionally, water loss results in decreased product weight and freshness, while in extreme cases all of the produce becomes unsaleable. Therefore, rapid cooling of fresh produce soon after harvest reduces the rates of respiration and transpiration, ethylene production and microbial growth thereby enhancing its freshness and nutritional value and preventing or delaying chilling injury [5][7]. Furthermore, precooling increases the daily intake of produce into a cold storage facility, which should be less than 10% of its cooling capacity if produce is not precooled, reducing the thermal load of cold storage, since optimum storage temperature is reached more quickly [6]. Studies have shown that the postharvest losses of commercial fruits and vegetables are about 25–30% without precooling and only 5–10% with precooling [8].
The choice of a particular precooling method for fruits and vegetables depends on multiple factors, such as the characteristics of the produce (including chilling sensitivity, geometry and thermal properties), the amount of produce to be cooled, air temperature, airflow rate, relative humidity, packing configuration and stacking arrangement of the produce, energy efficiency of the method, the availability of skilled labor and the economic viability (capital and running costs) of the precooling method [5][6][9][10].
Several studies in the literature on precooling methods for fresh fruits and vegetables are available [5][7][9][11][12]. Precooling methods, such as refrigerated room cooling, passive evaporative cooling, forced-air cooling, water cooling and ice cooling, along with their impacts, are compared in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of precooling methods and their effects on horticultural produce [5][9].
Methods Passive Evaporative Room Cooling (Use of Water-Soaked Media) Refrigerated Room Cooling (Cold Air Is Circulated around Containers) Forced-Air Cooling (Cold Air Is Forced through Containers) Water Cooling (Cold Water Is Used for Fast Cooling) Ice Cooling
Example of available systems Clay-in-clay passively cooled rooms; zero-energy cooling chambers (sand and bricks); charcoal-filled walls of non-refrigerated rooms Traditional cold rooms (pre-fabricated/self-built); retrofitted refrigerated container trailers; USDA Porta-cooler (small trailer-mounted pre-cooler) Portable forced-air pre-cooler; Cool & Ship (insulated precooling box with A/C unit); TORNADO mobile forced pre-cooler Mobile coolers; immersion-type conveyor coolers; shower-type batch coolers Package ice—crushed or slurry ice
Typical cooling time (h) 40–100 20–100 1–10 0.1–1.0 0.1–0.3
Produce moisture loss (%) No data 0.1–2.0 0.1–2.0 0–0.5 No data
Water contact with produce No No No Yes Yes
Potential for decay contamination Low Low Low High Low
Capital cost Low Low to medium Low Low High
Energy efficiency High Low Low High Low
Limitations and concerns Applicability and effectiveness limited by climatic factors; severely restricted temperature range Produce should not be harvested while hot to reduce water loss and/or microbial infections Effectiveness is limited by air flow configuration used, which may increase cost Recirculated water must be clean to avoid buildup of decay organisms Ice melting causes physical hazards during operations; need for moisture-proof packages

1.2. Bulk Cooling Systems for Storage of Fruits and Vegetables

Common cooling methods for bulk storage are vapor-compression systems, sorption systems and evaporative cooling systems. These systems are compared in Table 2. The technologies differ significantly with regard to a range of characteristics, such as temperature and relative humidity range, as well as energy and refrigerant use. The choice of cold storage system to be installed and site selection depends on many factors that include [2][13]: the level of temperature and relative humidity required; the location chosen should be easily accessible and close to produce collection points; uninterrupted supplies of electricity and water the availability of capital and skilled labor; and the economic value generated through cold storage to justify investment and running costs. Moreover, the selected technology needs to be sustainable and environmentally friendly, with zero or low greenhouse gas emissions [4]. Where feasible, the use of off-grid electricity, zero or renewable energy, and natural refrigerants should be highly encouraged. Accordingly, solar photovoltaic systems, wind power and biomass energy are gaining traction in the fast-growing renewable energy sector in Africa [14]. For instance, with 69% of the total final energy consumption in 2017 being from renewable energy sources, Sub-Saharan Africa showed the highest share of this sector. Hence, sustainable energy can be effectively harnessed to power off-grid cold storage facilities.
Table 2. Comparison of cold storage methods and designs with key operational characteristics [2].
Methods Common Systems (Design) Energy Requirement Temperature Provided Refrigerant
Evaporative coolers Zero-Energy Cooling Chamber (Walk-in cold room/chest-type cooler) No energy input required; optional use of low-voltage electric pumps and fans Vary widely depending on outside temperature and humidity; no less than approx. 15 °C Water (frequent refills required)
USDA-Portacooler Evaporative Forced-Air (Refrigerated trailer) 12/24V DC deep cycle battery
Charcoal cooler (Walk-in cold room/chest-type cooler) No energy input required; use of electric pumps/fans is optional
Sorption coolers Cooler (Solar adsorption cooling) Thermal energy 520 kWh/a/~60 W (80 °C) 4 °C to 8 °C Distilled water
Solar Polar (Adsorption cooling modules) Solar thermal energy (evacuated tube); thermal energy storage Not specified Ammonia–water
Vapor compression coolers DanSolar Cold Storage Chamber (Walk-in cold room) Off-grid standalone solar PV refrigeration −10 °C to 10 °C Not specified
Steca PF 166/PF 240 (Chest-type cooler) 12/24 V DC designed for off-grid solar PV operation 2 to 12 °C (refrigerator) or −20 to −10 °C (freezer) Halogenated
(R134a)
CoolBot (Walk-in cold room/refrigerated trailer) 110 V AC 2 °C and above Halogenated or natural refrigerant

1.2.1. Vapor-Compression Cooling System

Vapor-compression cooling is an electric-driven system which relies on phase changes of refrigerant fluid [2][15]. During operation, a circulating liquid refrigerant (halogenated or natural refrigerants) is exposed to different pressures successively. When subjected to low pressure surroundings, the liquid refrigerant evaporates while it absorbs and removes heat from its surroundings to provide a cooling effect. Subsequently, the gaseous refrigerant is first compressed and then condensed returning to its liquid state, while rejecting the heat previously absorbed to the environment.
This cooling method provides a full temperature range and a relative humidity of 80% to 90% which makes it suitable for chilling even high-value produce. Economically, this kind of cooling system has lower initial investment costs but may have high running costs depending on whether the cold room is pre-fabricated or owner built, new or used, and high maintenance costs [9]. This system has a comparatively high Coefficient of Performance (COP), which is the ratio between refrigerating capacity and power consumed. A shortcoming of this method has been the use of halogenated refrigerants, which, though widely available and relatively cheap, are not environmentally friendly. Natural alternatives, such as hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide and anhydrous ammonia, are now commercially available as alternatives but they are still relatively expensive in developing countries [2].

1.2.2. Sorption Cooling System

A sorption cooling system runs on thermal energy and relies on physicochemical attraction between a natural refrigerant and an adsorbent or absorbent [2]. Ammonia–water or lithium bromide–water combinations are mostly used in absorption systems, while silica gel–water or zeolite–water working pairs are mostly used in adsorption systems. To create a cooling effect, the refrigerant is subjected to a low-pressure surrounding in order to evaporate at ambient temperature while absorbing heat from its surrounding. Subsequently, the gaseous refrigerant is absorbed or adsorbed by the absorbent or adsorbent material. As a result, the pressure in the evaporator is reduced allowing more refrigerant to evaporate. Thermal energy is then used to evaporate the refrigerant from the adsorbent or absorbent and restore the original conditions.
Similar to vapor-compression systems, sorption cooling can provide a full temperature range and low/medium relative humidity. This makes it suitable for chilling sensitive and even high-value produce. Sorption cooling systems require higher capital costs and very low operating costs due to their flexible use of low-grade thermal energy sources (such as solar and industrial waste heat) and low maintenance requirements. In addition, sorption systems have lower COP compared to vapor-compression systems [2].

1.2.3. Evaporative Cooling System

An evaporative cooling system utilizes the cooling effect resulting from the evaporation of water [2][16]. Water is applied to a porous surface (e.g., sand or charcoal). As temperatures increase, it begins to evaporate. As water undergoes a phase change from liquid to gas, it absorbs energy in the form of heat from the surrounding air, thus cooling it. This simple cooling method only requires water as a coolant, running freely over a porous surface, and, since the process is driven by heat from the surrounding environment, requires no additional energy [13]. However, the cooling process if it relies on natural flow of air is slow and can be speeded up by using fan-assisted air flow systems.
Evaporative cooling systems are comparatively cheap due to the fact that they require very little or no energy input, can be constructed using locally available materials (e.g., bricks, charcoal and sand) and water as a coolant, and thus can be suitable for low-value produce [9][13][16][17]. However, this method provides limited temperature control due to its inherent dependence on local climatic conditions [18]. In most cases, temperatures above 15 °C and very high relative humidity are achieved. Hence, evaporative systems are mostly suitable for non-chilling fruit and vegetables, especially tropical/sub-tropical crops, such as tomatoes, mangoes, bananas, sapotas, plums, grapes, capsicums, cluster beans, peas, radishes, peaches, carrots, cucumbers, beats, ladies fingers, green peppers, cauliflowers and leafy vegetables [13]. As the availability of water is a critical factor in the operation of evaporative cooling systems, a continuous supply of reasonably sanitized and soft (i.e., no or low levels of calcium or magnesium) water in sufficient quantity, along with suitable water pumping technology and water storage reservoirs, are required [2].

2. Cold Storage Management

Prior to precooling and bulk storage of fruit and vegetables, appropriate harvesting and handling of fresh produce, taking into account maturity and ripeness levels and proper harvesting time (during periods of low temperatures or sunlight intensities), along with sorting and grading and adequate packaging, should be considered to avoid loss of quality through mechanical, chilling and freezing injuries and microbial growth, to extend shelf life during cold storage [7][11][12][13][19][20].
To improve the shelf life and quality of fresh fruits and vegetables, cold storage should be managed properly with regard to temperature, relative humidity levels, air flow, space between storage containers, mixing of compatible produce (e.g., according to temperature demand, odor production and ethylene sensitivity), as well as the management of product in- and outflow, which should follow the ‘First In, First Out’ principle [6][11][20][21]. In fact, the principle is to store each crop separately and the climacteric products at similar maturity stages. Since this is not always feasible, compatible crops can be stored together. For instance, with respect to odor transfers, apples and pears should be separated from celery, cabbage, carrots and onions. Additionally, storing celery with onions or carrots and citrus fruits with strongly scented vegetables should be avoided. Ethylene-producing crops, such as bananas, apples, avocadoes, peaches, plums and tomatoes, should be stored separately from ethylene-sensitive crops, such as carrots, lettuce, cucumbers and potatoes. Further to this, cold storage facilities should be cooled to the storage temperature required for the specific products before produce is stored.
Cold storages could be accompanied by modified-atmosphere technologies, such as Controlled Atmosphere (CA) storage and Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP), to further improve the effect of cooling on fresh fruits and vegetables. While CA storage replaces the traditional refrigerated storage rooms, MAP focuses on the environments of products within packaging. Nevertheless, both technologies consider the manipulation of the level of gases, such as oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen (N2), as a means to control fresh produce quality and storability through suppression of respiration (via high CO2 and low O2 conditions), inhibition of ethylene action (via high CO2, low O2), inhibition of decay (via high CO2) and inhibition of browning for fresh-cut produce (via low O2) [22][23]. In addition, the amount of water loss of fresh produce is reduced considerably, particularly in MAP. The application of CA storage is more intensive and active, as it relies on costly techniques, including the use of CO2 scrubbing methods to control CO2 levels, improved technologies for generating low O2 atmospheres and improved sense-and-respond systems for atmosphere control. On the other hand, MAP is more passive and hence cost-effective in low-income SSA countries. MAP can be further improved through the use of biodegradable plastics, sensors and the incorporation of bioactive compounds, such as absorbers of CO2, O2 and water vapor.
Edible coatings, such as some lipids, proteins, polysaccharides or mixed biopolymers, could be applied on fresh fruits and vegetables during cold storage to maintain quality (including texture, color and nutritional value) and extend shelf life [24][25]. Edible films form a thin semi-permeable layer when applied over the surface of fresh produce to provide a modified atmosphere during storage. As a result, gas transfer, water loss, color change and aroma loss are reduced. In addition, some edible films are carriers of antimicrobial and antioxidant agents and hence help to control microbial growth and biochemical activities, such as respiration and transpiration. Therefore, where applicable, the combination of optimal storage temperatures, relative humidity levels, atmospheric gases and edible coatings could improve the effectiveness of cooling techniques for fresh produce.
The operation and maintenance of a cold storage facilities is necessary to ensure that the purpose of cooling is achieved. Due to the costly and energy-intensive nature of cold storage facilities [2], the door to the cold storage room should be opened as few times as possible, particularly in the early morning or evening hours. In addition, the usage of lighting and fans should be kept to a minimum [7]. A logbook should be used to keep all information on incoming produce up-to-date, such as harvest date, precooling method used, arrival and storage time, quality, quantity, storage conditions, energy consumption, and location within the cold storage facility [6]. Moreover, good hygienic practices inside the cold storage facility, such as personnel hygiene, facility cleanliness, maintained with hypochlorite solution and ozone generators, and regular ventilation to reduce concentrations of carbon dioxide, ethylene and odors, should be taken into consideration [26].
Cold storage control systems can also be integrated with modern intelligent control methods, such as frequency-controlled compression technology, Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) technology, fuzzy control, in combination with Internet of Things, to optimize the control of cold storage for low-energy consumption, cost saving and low environmental impact [27].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/horticulturae8090776

References

  1. Kitinoja, L. Use of cold chains for reducing food losses in developing countries. The Postharvest Education Foundation (PEF). 2013. Available online: http://www.postharvest.org/Use%20of%20cold%20chains%20PEF%20white%20paper%2013-03%20final.pdf (accessed on 30 December 2021).
  2. Lange, B.; Priesemann, C.; Geiss, M.; Lambrecht, A. GIZ GmbH. Promoting Food Security and Safety via Cold Chains: Technology options, Cooling Needs and Energy Requirements. 2016. Available online: https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz_2016_Food_Security_Cold_Chains.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  3. Utz, V. GIZ-HERA. Modern Energy Services for Modern Agriculture: A Review of Smallholder Farming in Developing Countries. 2011. Available online: https://energypedia.info/images/f/fd/Energy_Services_for_Modern_Agriculture.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  4. Ravishankar, M.; Bordat, S.; Aitken, D.; Net Zero Cold Chains for Food. Carbon Trust. 2020. Available online: https://prod-drupal-files.storage.googleapis.com/documents/resource/public/Net_zero_cold_chains_for_food.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2022).
  5. Elansari, A.M.; Fenton, D.L.; Callahan, C.W. Precooling. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 161–207.
  6. National Horticulture Board. Cold Storage for Fresh Horticulture Produce Requiring Pre-Cooling before Storage (Technical Standards Number NHB-CS-Type 02-2010). National Horticulture Board. 2010. Available online: http://nhb.gov.in/documents/cs2.pdf (accessed on 22 January 2022).
  7. USAID. Empowering Agriculture: Energy Options for Horticulture. United States Agency for International Development. 2009. Available online: http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/datastore/234-1386.pdf (accessed on 14 February 2022).
  8. Zhou, Y.; Zheng, M.; Chune, Z.; Yubai, C. Study on Forced-air Pre-cooling of Longan. In Proceedings of the ASABE Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 17–20 June 2007; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA Paper No. 076267.
  9. Kitinoja, L.; Thompson, J.F. Pre-cooling systems for small-scale producers. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 2010, 2, 2.
  10. Dehghannya, J.; Ngadi, M.; Vigneault, C. Mathematical modeling procedures for airflow, heat and mass transfer during forced convection cooling of produce: A review. Food Eng. Rev. 2010, 2, 227–243.
  11. Kitinoja, L.; Kader, A.A. Small-Scale Postharvest Handling Practices: A Manual for Horticultural Crops, 4th ed.; University of California at Davis: Davis, CA, USA, 2004; Post-Harvest Horticulture Series No. 8E July 2002, slightly revised in November 2003; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ae075e/ae075e14.htm (accessed on 3 January 2022).
  12. Dumont, M.; Orsat, V.; Raghavan, V. Reducing postharvest losses. In Emerging Technologies for Promoting Food Security: Overcoming the World Food Crisis; Madramootoo, C., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; pp. 135–156.
  13. Elansari, A.M.; Yahia, E.M.; Siddiqui, W. Storage systems. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 401–437.
  14. Bishoge, O.K.; Zhang, L.; Mushi, W.G. The potential renewable energy for sustainable development in Tanzania: A review. Clean Technol. 2018, 1, 70–88.
  15. Fenton, D.L.; Callahan, C.W. Refrigeration. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 209–270.
  16. Basediya, A.L.; Samuel, D.V.K.; Beera, V. Evaporative cooling system for storage of fruits and vegetables—A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 429–442.
  17. Kitinoja, L. World Food Logistics Organization. Identification of Appropriate Postharvest Technologies for Improving Market Access and Incomes for Small Horticultural Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. 2010. Available online: http://ucanr.edu/datastoreFiles/234-1847.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  18. Verploegen, E.; Ekka, R.; Gill, G. Feed the Future. Evaporative Cooling for Improved Fruit and Vegetable Storage in Rwanda and Burkina Faso. 2019. Available online: https://horticulture.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk1816/files/extension_material_files/Evaporative-Cooling-Improved-Fruit-Vegetable-Storage-in-Rwanda-Burkina-Faso-190531.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  19. Erkan, M.; Dogan, A. Harvesting of horticultural commodities. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 129–159.
  20. Kader, A.A.; Rolle, R.S. The Role of Post-harvest Management in Assuring the Quality and Safety of Horticultural Produce. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2003. Available online: https://fao.org/3/y5431e/y5431e00.htm#contents (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  21. You, Y.; Li, M.; Kang, T.; Ko, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.H.; Jun, S. Application of supercooling for the enhanced shelf life of Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Foods 2021, 10, 2361.
  22. Beaudry, R. Atmosphere control in packages and CA rooms: Biology, technology, and future opportunities. Acta Hortic. 2019, 1256, 541–548.
  23. Ben-Yehoshua, S.; Beaudry, R.M.; Fishman, S.; Jayanty, S.; Mir, N. Modified atmosphere packaging and controlled atmosphere storage. In Environmentally Friendly Technologies for Produce Quality; Ben-Yehoshua, S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 61–112.
  24. Singh, D.P.; Packirisamy, G. Biopolymer based edible coating for enhancing the shelf life of horticulture products. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2022, 4, 100085.
  25. Olivas, G.I.; Davila-Avina, J.E.; Salas-Salazar, N.A.; Molina, F.J. Use of edible coatings to preserve the quality of fruits and vegetables during storage. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 2008, 3, 6.
  26. FAO. Manual for the Preparation and Sale of Fruits and Vegetables: From Field to Markets. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2004. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/y4893e/y4893e00.htm#Contents (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  27. Guo, C. Application of intelligent technology in cold storage control system. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 571, 012026.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback