Fruit Development in Sweet Cherry: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Andrew Simkin
,
,
Jim Dunwell
,
Mario Caccamo

Fruits are an important source of vitamins, minerals and nutrients in the human diet. They also contain several compounds of nutraceutical importance that have significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory roles. Cherries contain high concentrations of bioactive compounds and minerals, including calcium, phosphorous, potassium and magnesium, and it is, therefore, unsurprising that cherry consumption has a positive impact on health. The sweet cherry fruit is a drupe—an indehiscent fruit of 1–2 cm in diameter (in some cultivars the diameter can be larger) that has an attractive appearance due to its color (bright red to dark purple depending on the cultivar) and desirable, intense flavor.

  • tree fruit
  • fruit ripening
  • rootstock
  • Prunus avium

1. Introduction

Cherry (Prunus avium) is believed to be native to Europe and southern Asia [1] and to a small isolated region in the western Himalayas. Commonly called sweet cherry, it is a deciduous tree, 15–32 m in height and with a trunk up to 1.5 m in circumference. It belongs to the Rosaceae family, which includes many plants, such as rose, apple (Malus x domestica), peach (Prunus persica) and strawberry (Fragaria vesca and F. ananassa) that are very important for the human economy. The sweet cherry genome is diploid (2n = 16), simple, compact and about 350 Mb in size. The genome structure is predicted to be similar to that of the peach, although the sequences have diverged [2][3][4] See (http://www.rosaceae.org accessed on 1 June 2022) [5].
Young cherry trees show strong apical dominance with a straight trunk and symmetrical conical crown that becomes rounded to irregular for old trees. All parts of the plant, except for the ripe fruit, are slightly toxic, due to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides. The species has also become naturalized in North America and Australia since it is largely cultivated in these regions.

2. Cherry from Flower to Fruit

2.1. Cherry Flower Pollination

The sweet cherry flower is hermaphroditic; possessing both female and male reproductive organs. Each flower is approximately 2.5 cm in diameter, with five petals surrounded by five green sepals, a single upright pistil with an ovary, two ovules, and 30 stamens. The stamens are the male reproductive organs consisting of anthers, where the pollen develops; it sits on top of the stalk-like filaments, which allows water and nutrients to reach the anthers from the mother plant and facilitate pollen dispersal [6][7]. The pistil or gynoecium is the female reproductive organ, and it occupies the centre of the flower.
The flowers open for between three and five days and the stigma is receptive to pollination at this time. The anthers begin to open shortly after the flower and continue into the second day [8]. In sweet cherry, it takes two to three days for the pollen tube to grow from the stigma to the base of the style, whilst fertilization occurs six to eight days after pollination [9][10]. Stösser and Anvari [11] determined that effective pollination takes between 4 and 5 days; however, under some conditions, effective pollination can last up to 13 days [12]. There are a number of varieties of sweet cherry that exhibit self-fertility, the first and most notable being ‘Stella’, which was first identified in Canada [13], and is highly sought-after and considered a cultivar of great importance [14][15][16]. However, most sweet cherry cultivars exhibit self-incompatibility (SI), a characteristic that involves inhibition of pollen tube growth, and is genetically controlled by multiple allelic S-loci [17][18][19][20]. SI sweet cherry varieties still produce a small number of fruit through self-pollination; however, different varieties are considered to have different levels of self-sterility, with important commercial varieties, such as ‘Kordia’ and ‘Regina’ being highly incompatible and setting virtually no fruit in the absence of cross-pollination [21].
The nectar of sweet cherry is rich in sugars (from 28% to 55% sugar), the most abundant of which are fructose, glucose and sucrose, which are highly attractive to pollinating insects, including bees [22]. It is well known that insect-mediated pollination in sweet cherry is important for the production of a viable crop and besides the environmental conditions, pollinating insects are the most important factor governing yield [23]. Work by Holzschuch et al. [24] showed that bagged flowers produced only 3% of the number of fruits produced by unbagged flowers and that the rates of pollination and fruit set were related to wild bee visitation. Wild pollinators, including solitary bees, have been described as being instrumental in achieving adequate sweet cherry yields [25]. These authors also showed that pollination by wild bees surpassed pollination by honeybees. However, even with this knowledge, less than 17% of growers provide trap nests for solitary bees in their orchards and rely on commercial domesticated honeybees (Apis mellifera) to carry out this function at a cost up to 1000 Euro per hectare—a considerable investment for commercial cherry producers. A recent review has outlined grower knowledge of the role of insects on sweet cherry crops [23].
Air temperature is also known to influence flowering and fruit sets and has no influence on the level of SI; however, the air temperature may influence pollen tube growth [26]. The optimal temperature for flowering has been reported to be around 20 °C, with temperatures as low as 15 °C slowing the disappearance of the embryo sac, as compared to 25 °C [27]. Temperatures exceeding 30 °C are considered too high for successful flowering [26][28][29]. Furthermore, it has been reported that a sudden fall in temperature at the end of the flowering period can result in a total loss of the crop [21].

2.2. The ABCDE and the Floral Quartet Models

Flower organs are arranged in whorls, with sepals that are located in the most external whorl and carpels in the inner whorl, in the form of petals and stamens. Floral homeotic mutants, i.e., mutants with an altered floral organ identity, such as in Arabidopsis thaliana and Antirrhinum majus (snapdragon), have been studied and used to propose the ABC model of flower formation [30][31]. ABC genes encode three different classes of MADS-domain transcription factors involved in the flower organ identity determination. These factors interact to give the organ identity to sepal, petals, stamens and carpel. Further studies showed the existence of two other classes: the D class, which is responsible for the ovule identity, and the E-class, which has been proposed as another class of redundant floral organ identity genes [32]. This enhanced ABCDE model postulates that sepals are specified by A + E, petals by A + B + E, stamens by B + C + E, carpels by C + E and ovules by C + D + E (Figure 1) [32][33][34][35].
Plants 11 01531 g002 550
Figure 1. Floral quartet model (FQM) integrated into the ABCDE model proposed to explain the flower whorls’ identity determination in Arabidopsis thaliana. This enhanced ABCDE model postulates that sepals are specified by A + E, petals by A + B + E, stamens by B + C + E, carpels by C + E and ovules by C + D + E. Class-A protein: APETALA1 (AP1); Class-B proteins: PISTILLATA (PI) and APETALA3 (AP3); Class-C protein: AGAMOUS (AG); Class-D proteins: SEEDSTICK (STK) and SHATTERPROOF (SHP); Class-E protein: SEPALLATA (SEP).
In addition, the floral quartet model (FQM, Figure 1) has been suggested to integrate the ABCDE model [32]. According to the FQM, the factors form tetrameric complexes to carry out their functions, binding the DNA to activate or repress the expression of their target genes [32]. In particular, two MIKC-type MADS-box transcription factors belonging to the same class form a dimer, which can interact with another dimer of the same class or of a different class, to promote the development of a specific floral organ [35]. The MIKC-type MADS-box transcription factors are composed of specific domains:
  • MADS (M) domain: a DNA-binding domain, but it is also involved in dimerization and in nuclear localization. It is the most conserved domain among the MADS-box transcription factors [36].
  • Intervening (I) domain: takes part in the selective formation of DNA-binding dimers. It shows only limited conservation [37].
  • Keratin-like (K) domain: an essential element for dimerization and multimeric complex formation. This domain has a particular structural organization (amphipathic helices) in which the hydrophobic and charged residues are conserved and regularly spaced [38][39].
  • C-terminal (C) domain: is somewhat variable. In some cases, it takes part in the transcriptional activation of the target genes or in the formation of multimeric complexes [37].
According to the FQM, MADS-box transcription factors form dimers, which bind the DNA where the CArG-boxes are present. The two dimers that are present in the tetramer recognize and bind the two different CArG-boxes—which can be far away in the DNA sequence—by looping the DNA and making them spatially close [32][35][40].

3. Cherry Fruit Development

3.1. Cherry Fruit

The sweet cherry fruit is a drupe—an indehiscent fruit of 1–2 cm in diameter (in some cultivars the diameter can be larger) that has an attractive appearance due to its color (bright red to dark purple depending on the cultivar) and desirable, intense flavor. Three parts can be identified in a drupe: the outer exocarp or skin; the mesocarp, which is the fleshy part of the fruit; and a single central stone, which is the lignified endocarp that surrounds the seed. Drupe development in cherry fruit is consistent with the reported stages of growth in other drupes, as described below.
Cherry varieties can be divided into early, mid and late ripening types (Table 1) based on the ripening of the reference variety at the European level, Burlat, a widespread cultivated cherry across Europe.
Table 1. Some of the most commonly commercially cultivated varieties of sweet cherry. Early, mid and late ripening types based on the ripening of the reference variety, Burlat, a widespread cultivated cherry across Europe. Comparisons to the variety Bing are based on interviews with growers in Stanislaus County, California and on published data. NR—not reported.
Ripen Days Post-Burlat * Days Post Bing ** Variety Reported Qualities and Region of Origin
Burlat 0 NR Burlat The most widespread and cultivated cherry among existing varieties. It has good flavor, high resistance to cracking compared to most varieties, and exceeds in its time.
Early 0–11 NR Merchant Self-sterile, mature 7 days post-Burlat. Producing good yields of large, dark red fruit in early summer. Self-sterile, mature 9 days after Burlat.
NR Carmen Developed and cultivated in Hungary. Fruit have large size and good flavor. Spreading in Germany due to its high yields.
Mid 12–19 NR Grace Star Recent Italian variety. Self-fertile with maturation occurring 12 days post-Burlat. Large fruit, firm texture, excellent flavor qualities, and highly valued by consumers.
−5 CristalinaTm Self-sterile cherry of Canadian origin. Mature 12 days post-Burlat. High productivity, under conditions of moderate load. Fruit have good firmness and very good flavor and is moderately sensitive to cracking.
0 Stella One of the first self-fertile varieties (Canadian origin). Ripens 19 days post-Burlat. Large fruit, blood-red hue, good resistance to cracking, sensitive to cold. Highly sought-after. Considered a cultivar of great importance.
Bing Bing Most traditional and representative cherry of America. Ripening occurs 19 days post-Burlat. Fruit are dark red, large, firm, and highly valued for their excellent flavor and is the preeminent fresh-market cherry.
0 Rainer Bicolor cherry from the United States. The variety is self-sterile and ripens 19 days post-Burlat. Variety is appreciated by the industry owing to the large size and good flavor of the fruit.
Late 20–27 NR Kordia Originating in the Czech Republic with good resistance to cracking. Very popular in Germany. Ripens 24 days post-Burlat. Known for large, firm fruit and good flavor. Highly incompatible and setting virtually no fruit in the absence of cross-pollination.
3 SonataTm Self-fertile Canadian variety with good productivity. Ripens 22 days post-Burlat. Fruit have a good taste and are large and firm in size. Unfortunately, it is highly susceptible to cracking.
5–7 Lapins Highly productive self-fertile from the United States. Currently, most planted cherry in the world. Good flavor with cracking resistance. Variety is appreciated by farmers. Ripens 24 days post-Burlat (see SkeenaTm).
7–10 BentonTm Another self-fertile cherry tree that ripens mid-season and has been reputed to surpass Bing cherries.
10–14 SkeenaTm Characterized as an improved Lapins. Similar characteristics, but lower productivity, which helps to produce cherries of greater caliber and quality. In the United States, replacing Lapins. Mature 25 days post-Burlat.
11–13 SweetheartTm Late maturation with large fruit. Prolific fruiters with a dark red, medium to large cherries. Pruning is required to keep trees productive.
Extra Late More than 28 NR Regina Self-sterile variety of German origin. Low productivity with maturation occurring 31 days post-Burlat. Large sized fruit, good taste and cultivated due to its high resistance to cracking. Highly incompatible and setting virtually no fruit in the absence of cross-pollination.
    NR Ambrunes Spanish Cherry is traditionally grown in Cáceres. Firm fruit with very good flavor. High resistance to cracking. Ripens 31 days post-Burlat.
* https://en.excelentesprecios.com/cherry-tree-varieties, (3 June 2022); ** https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.naver?isHttpsRedirect=true&blogId=2jw67&logNo=90164242596 1 June 2022. Tm = trademark.
During early fruit development, there is constant communication between the developing fruit and the developing seed. These signals can be hormones, such as auxin and gibberellins, produced in the endosperm or in the seed coat and are involved in the developmental synchronization of all these different structures [41][42][43][44]. The disruption of this communication is one of the triggers of fruit drop—the loss of a significant proportion of their fruit before ripening. This loss, which is often referred to as ‘June Drop’ or ‘Cherry Run Off’, varies from year to year and, in some seasons, can result in a total loss of the crop.

3.2. Physiological Changes during Cherry Fruit Development

The developmental growth rate of the drupe can be described by a double sigmoid curve, where three well-marked stages can be identified (Figure 2). In the first phase (stage I), the ovary either aborts or starts all the subsequent morphological changes that will lead to the formation of the fruit [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. The traditional definition of phase I, beginning at anthesis, also includes the acceleration of the growth of the ovary approximately two weeks before anthesis [52].
Plants 11 01531 g003 550
Figure 2. A double sigmoid growth curve representation. Cumulative and rate of growth are defined. After an initial exponential phase (Stage I) a second plateau phase occurs (Stage II), which is followed then by a second exponential phase (Stage III) until the complete ripening of the fruit. Developmental phases are allocated with respect to peaks and troughs in growth rate.
The outer epidermis of the developing cherry fruit consists of a single row of cells that are covered externally by a cuticle, which is interrupted only where the stomata are present. During the pre-flowering period, the cells of the epidermis are already well-differentiated, with an elongated shape and no hairs, and increase their size slowly, mainly in the radial direction. The mitotic activity is low since the increase in the number of cells is very limited, while it is high during the first half of stage I (Figure 3). The second half of stage I is characterized by an increase in cell size, both radially and tangentially. Moreover, during the second half of stage I, the cuticle reaches its full thickness. No cell division is observed during stage II, which is characterized by slight tangential elongation of cells and additional cell wall thickening. Lastly, during the final phase (stage III), cells start to enlarge by as much as 100-fold, contributing to the final fruit size. After these three phases, a green immature fruit is formed, which has the dimensions of the mature fruit and starts the maturation process [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. A more than two-fold tangential enlargement of the cells occurs, with a decrease in the radial diameter and cuticle thickness, in order to generate a large increase in the fruit surface area [53].
Plants 11 01531 g004 550
Figure 3. Fruit Ripening in the cultivated cherry. After an initial exponential phase (Stage I) a plateau phase occurs (Stage II), which is followed then by a second exponential phase (Stage III) until the complete ripening of the fruit.
During the pre-bloom period, the fleshy mesocarp is composed of isodiametric parenchymatous cells, which elongate according to a gradient tangentially to slightly radial from the epidermis to the stony endocarp, respectively. The increase in tissue thickness, more than double, is due mostly to cell division. The first half of stage I is characterized by cell mitotic divisions, accomplishing an increase of about 20–30% in the number of cells from the epidermis to the stone, and no further divisions are observed after completion of this stage [53]. The cells increase in diameter more than four-fold, mostly during the second half of stage I. Moreover, differentiation of a hypodermal layer, five or six cells thick, occurs just under the epidermis, by considerable thickening of the cells. These cells become slightly greater in size than those of the epidermis and become tangentially elongated. On the other side, adjacent to the stone, a layer of small isodiametric cells, three or four cells wide, differentiates, during the second half of stage I. During stage II, some cell enlargement, less than 6%, occurs and intercellular spaces remain prominent. The cells just under the epidermis continue slowly to elongate tangentially, while limited cell division can be found in the thin layer of small cells adjacent to the stone, otherwise, there is none. Stage III is also called “the final swell” and during this period, four parts of the fleshy mesocarp can be recognized (from the epidermis to the stony endocarp):
  • The hypodermal layer of collenchyma;
  • The peripheral layer of thin-walled parenchyma, extending to a line just inside the ring of vascular bundles;
  • The layer of radially elongated cells, extending from this line nearly to the stone;
  • The thin layer of small cells adjacent to the stone.
The transition from one layer to the other is not precise, since there is a gradual transition from a tissue in which one cell type predominates to one in which another one is dominant. A gradient of cell elongation can be identified, from tangential in the hypodermal cells to radial in the ones close to the stone. The rapid cell enlargement brings a decrease in the thickness of the cell walls and the disappearance of the intercellular spaces that are now difficult to identify [53].
The ventral and the dorsal capillary bundles do not enter the stony endocarp, while the two bundles that supply the two ovules (in peach called “funicular bundles”) are at either side of the ventral suture and adjacent to the ovarian cavity. Pit bundles traversing the stony endocarp, of the type found in peach, are not present in cherry. During the pre-bloom period, the differentiation of a ring of vascular bundles, which extends through the fleshy mesocarp parallel to the central axis, occurs. However, the walls of xylem elements do not become sufficiently thickened to become conspicuous until about the full-bloom period. The number of bundles is fixed, so that as the fruit develops, the vasculature system extends progressively throughout the flesh, mostly by a transverse divergence of small bundles from the main ones. At maturity, a skeleton network of conductive tissue is present [53].
The innermost ovary wall comprises a single layer of cells, called the inner epidermis, and three or four layers of pericarp cells. These cells, which are going to become part of the stony endocarp, are smaller than the cells that are going to become the fleshy mesocarp, and this size difference persists to maturity. During the pre-bloom period, the inner epidermal cells elongate tangentially and divide transversally just before full bloom, to form with adjacent pericarp cells with a similar orientation—a “hoop” shape that surrounds the ovary cavity. The presence of this hoop is also reported in other species [54][55]. The group of cells that differentiate into the stony endocarp do not give rise to the fleshy mesocarp and vice versa. Stage I is characterized by a large increase in both the number and size of the inner layer cells (tangential elongation) and the outer layer cells (central radial elongation). No cell divisions are observed in the inner layer during the second half of stage I, while there is a greater increase in the mitotic divisions and cell size in the outer layer. Cell walls become progressively thicker but do not harden significantly until the end of this stage, which is when the pit cannot be sectioned without special treatment [53]. The thickening and hardening of the cell walls are the main events that occur during stage II, and no cell divisions are observed after the mid-point of this stage. Hardening does not occur uniformly in the stony endocarp, but it begins near the apical end at the hilum, and continues downwards toward the chalaza before finally including the whole endocarp. Although lignification occurs, cells are living and nuclei are abundant, even though the cellular lumen is frequently scarcely larger than the nucellus. At the end of stage II, the stony endocarp is made of 26–27 layers of very thick-walled lignified cells. This number of layers is the same as that present in the fleshy mesocarp, although the thickness is much less due to the very different destinies of the two tissues. During stage III, there is a slight increase in hardness and brittleness that is associated with a loss of moisture. It is possible to find occasional living cells with active nuclei [53].

3.3. Final Ripening Stages of Mature Cherry

Fruit ripening is a highly variable process with numerous differences when different plant species are compared; however ripening is often characterized by the accumulation of pigments, such as carotenoid sand anthocyanins (Figure 4) [56]. Despite these differences, fruit ripening has been classified into two distinct groups, climacteric and non-climacteric, which differ in their patterns of ethylene production and respiration at the onset of the ripening process [57][58]. Climacteric fruit, such as tomato, display a rise in respiration and a burst of ethylene modulating the differentiation of chloroplast to chromoplast and the accumulation of carotenoids [59][60]. In contrast, cherry fruit are non-climacteric and ripening is promoted by abscisic acid (ABA) [61]. No burst of ethylene and respiration has been observed in sweet cherry during fruit development and ripening. Moreover, the exogenous ethylene treatment has no significant effects on the fruit’s respiration rate or on its softening [62][63]. Ethylene concentrations remain low [64][65], although ethylene may affect the accumulation of anthocyanins [66]. However, it should be noted that the ethylene concentration in some sweet cherry cultivars has been shown to increase sharply before harvest [67], suggesting that it may play some role in fruit ripening during the maturation phase of development [68]. In sweet cherry, ABA levels increase before maturation and decrease near harvest [64][69]. Furthermore, in grapes, another non-climacteric fruit, the onset of ripening is ABA related; ABA modulates the changes in colour and the accumulation of sugars and has a role in fruit softening in the later stages of ripening [70][71][72].
Plants 11 01531 g005 550
Figure 4. Final stages of fruit ripening in the cultivated cherry.
Cherry ripening is associated with changes in colour, sugar, vitamin and organic acid content (Figure 4). In sweet cherries, ABA has been associated with the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis and the organoleptic properties (ratio of total soluble sugars to total acidity) [64][66][73]. The colour of the fruit is attributed to the accumulation of these water-soluble health-promoting anthocyanins (a class of flavonoids), which are responsible for the blue, purple and red colours [74][75]. In addition to ABA, cytokinins, jasmonic acid (JA), gibberellins (GAs), and auxins, all play roles in the ripening of non-climacteric fruit. Auxin (1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)) treatment has been shown to enhance anthocyanin production in sweet cherry by upregulating key anthocyanin regulatory, biosynthetic and transport genes [76]. This study demonstrated that treatment with NAA alters ethylene production, induces ripening, and enhances anthocyanin production, probably through ABA metabolism [76].
Size, colour, firmness, sweetness and flavour intensity are considered the most critical attributes that drive consumer acceptance and, ultimately, the value of the crop to the producers [77][78][79][80]. However, consumers from different countries and regions place different values on their requirements for a good cherry. For example, consumers in Norway prefer dark, large cherries [81][82]. Similar results were found in the UK [83] and in American markets [84]. These consumer requirements may differ from those of the growers and supermarkets. Growers want cherries that are resistant to cracking and can be left on the trees longer to ripen, are easy to harvest (long peduncles) and firm enough to resist damage during picking, processing, and transporting. Supermarkets want cherries with long shelf lives, even weeks once in store.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants11121531

References

  1. Faust, M.; Surányi, D. Origin and dissemination of cherry. Hortic. Rev. 1997, 19, 263–317.
  2. Guajardo, V.; Solís, S.; Sagredo, B.; Gainza, F.; Muñoz, C.; Gasic, K.; Hinrichsen, P. Construction of high density sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) linkage maps using microsatellite markers and SNPs detected by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127750.
  3. Koepke, T.; Schaeffer, S.; Krishnan, V.; Jiwan, D.; Harper, A.; Whiting, M.; Oraguzie, N.; Dhingra, A. Rapid gene-based SNP and haplotype marker development in non-model eukaryotes using 3′UTR sequencing. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 18.
  4. Tan, Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, M.; Wen, B.; Jiang, S.; Chen, X.; Fu, X.; Li, D.; Wu, H.; et al. Chromosome-level genome assemblies of five Prunus species and genome-wide association studies for key agronomic traits in peach. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 213.
  5. Jung, S.; Staton, M.; Lee, T.; Blenda, A.; Svancara, R.; Abbott, A.; Main, D. GDR (Genome Database for Rosaceae): Integrated web-database for Rosaceae genomics and genetics data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D1034–D1040.
  6. Scott, R.J.; Spielman, M.; Dickinson, H.G. Stamen structure and function. Plant Cell 2004, 16 (Suppl. 1), S46–S60.
  7. Abrol, D.P. Stone Fruits. In Pollination Biology, Vol. 1: Pests and Pollinators of Fruit Crops; Abrol, D.P., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 143–175.
  8. Srivastava, R.C.; Singh, I. Floral biology, fruit-set, fruit-drop and physicochemical characters of sweet-cherry (Prunus avium L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 1970, 40, 400–420.
  9. Kron, P.; Husband, B.C. The effects of pollen diversity on plant reproduction: Insights from apple. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2006, 19, 125–131.
  10. Ughini, V.; Roversi, A. Investigations on sweet cherry effective pollination period. Acta Hortic. 1996, 410, 423–426.
  11. Stösser, R.; Anvari, S.F. Pollen tube growth and fruit set as influenced by senescence of stigma, style and ovules. Acta Hortic. 1983, 139, 13–22.
  12. Roversi, A.; Ughini, V. How long should the period for a successful pollination of sweet cherry be? Acta Hortic. 1998, 468, 615–620.
  13. Thompson, M. Flowering, Pollination and Fruit Set. In Cherries: Crop Physiology, Production and Uses; Webster, A.D., Looney, N., Eds.; CAB International: Oxon, UK, 1996; pp. 223–241.
  14. Godini, A.; Palasciano, M.; Cozzi, G.; Petruzzi, G. Role of self-pollination and horticultural importance of self-compatibility in cherry. Acta Hortic. 1998, 468, 567–574.
  15. Hauck, N.R.; Yamane, H.; Tao, R.; Iezzoni, A.F. Self-compatibility and incompatibility in tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Sex. Plant Reprod. 2002, 15, 39–46.
  16. Dirlevander, E.; Claverie, J.; Wünsch, A.; Iezzoni, A.F. Cherry. In Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants; Kole, C., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; Volume 4, pp. 103–118.
  17. Crane, M.B.; Brown, A.G. Incompatibility and sterility in the sweet cherry, Prunus avium L. J. Pomol. Hortic. Sci. 1938, 15, 116.
  18. Crane, M.B.; Lawrence, W.J.C. Genetical and cytological aspects of incompatibility and sterility in cultivated fruits. J. Pomol. Hortic. Sci. 1928, 7, 276–301.
  19. Sebolt, A.M.; Iezzoni, A.F. Utilization of the S-locus as a genetic marker in cherry to differentiate among different pollen donors. HortScience 2009, 44, 1542–1546.
  20. Wiersma, P.A.; Wu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Hampson, C.; Kappel, F. Identification of new self-incompatibility alleles in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) and clarification of incompatibility groups by PCR and sequencing analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102, 700–708.
  21. Lech, W.; Małodobry, M.; Dziedzic, E.; Bieniasz, M.; Doniec, S. Biology of sweet cherry flowering. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2008, 16, 189–199.
  22. Akšić, M.F.; Čolić, S.; Meland, M.; Natić, M. Sugar and polyphenolic diversity in floral nectar of cherry. In Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites; Mérillon, J.-M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 755–773.
  23. Eeraerts, M.; Borremans, L.; Smagghe, G.; Meeus, I. A growers’ perspective on crop pollination and measures to manage the pollination service of wild pollinators in sweet cherry cultivation. Insects 2020, 11, 372.
  24. Holzschuh, A.; Dudenhöffer, J.-H.; Tscharntke, T. Landscapes with wild bee habitats enhance pollination, fruit set and yield of sweet cherry. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 153, 101–107.
  25. Eeraerts, M.; Smagghe, G.; Meeus, I. Pollinator diversity, floral resources and semi-natural habitat, instead of honey bees and intensive agriculture, enhance pollination service to sweet cherry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 284, 106586.
  26. Hedhly, A.; Hormaza, J.I.; Herrero, M. Effect of temperature on pollen tube kinetics and dynamics in sweet cherry, Prunus avium (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 558–564.
  27. Beppu, K.; Komatsu, N.; Yamane, H.; Yaegaki, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Tao, R.; Kataoka, I. Se-haplotype confers self-compatibility in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 760–764.
  28. Beppu, K.; Kataoka, I. High temperature rather than drought stress is responsible for the occurrence of double pistils in ‘Satohnishiki’ sweet cherry. Sci. Hortic. 1999, 81, 125–134.
  29. Eaton, G.W. A study of the megagametophyte in P. avium and its relation to fruit setting. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1959, 39, 466–476.
  30. Bowman, J.L.; Smyth, D.R.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 1991, 112, 1–20.
  31. Coen, E.S.; Meyerowitz, E.M. The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nat. Commun. 1991, 353, 31–37.
  32. Theißen, G. Development of floral organ identity: Stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 75–85.
  33. Goto, K.; Kyozuka, J.; Bowman, J.L. Turning floral organs into leaves, leaves into floral organs. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11, 449–456.
  34. Theißen, G.; Melzer, R.; Rümpler, F. MADS-domain transcription factors and the floral quartet model of flower development: Linking plant development and evolution. Development 2016, 143, 3259–3271.
  35. Theißen, G.; Saedler, H. Floral quartets. Nat. Commun. 2001, 409, 469–471.
  36. Gramzow, L.; Theissen, G. A hitchhikers guide to the MADS world of plants. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, 214.
  37. Kaufmann, K.; Melzer, R.; Theissen, G. MIKC-type MADS-domain proteins: Structural modularity, protein interactions and network evolution in land plants. Gene 2005, 347, 183–198.
  38. Puranik, S.; Acajjaoui, S.; Conn, S.; Costa, L.; Conn, V.; Vial, A.; Marcellin, R.; Melzer, R.; Brown, E.; Hart, D.; et al. Structural basis for the oligomerization of the MADS domain transcription factor SEPALLATA3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3603–3615.
  39. Yang, Y.; Fanning, L.; Jack, T. The K domain mediates heterodimerization of the Arabidopsis floral organ identity proteins, APETALA3 and PISTILLATA. Plant J. 2003, 33, 47–59.
  40. Theißen, G.; Gramzow, L. Chapter 8—Structure and evolution of plant MADS domain transcription factors. In Plant Transcription Factors: Evolutionary, Structural and Functional Aspects; Gonzalez, D.H., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 127–138.
  41. Varoquaux, F.; Blanvillain, R.; Delseny, M.; Gallois, P. Less is better: New approaches for seedless fruit production. Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 233–242.
  42. Dorcey, E.; Urbez, C.; Blázquez, M.A.; Carbonell, J.; Perez-Amador, M.A. Fertilization-dependent auxin response in ovules triggers fruit development through the modulation of gibberellin metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 58, 318–332.
  43. Vriezen, W.H.; Feron, R.; Maretto, F.; Keijman, J.; Mariani, C. Changes in tomato ovary transcriptome demonstrate complex hormonal regulation of fruit set. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 60–76.
  44. Wang, H.; Schauer, N.; Usadel, B.; Frasse, P.; Zouine, M.; Hernould, M.; Latché, A.; Pech, J.C.; Fernie, A.R.; Bouzayen, M. Regulatory features underlying pollination-dependent and -independent tomato fruit set revealed by transcript and primary metabolite profiling. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1428–1452.
  45. Tukey, H.B. Growth of the embryo, seed, and pericarp of the sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) in relation to season of fruit ripening. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1934, 31, 125–144.
  46. Lilleland, O. Growth study of the plum fruit-I. The growth and changes in chemical composition of the climax plum. In Proceeding of the American Society for Horticultural Science; American Society for Horticultural Science: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1933; Volume 30, pp. 203–208.
  47. Lilleland, O. Growth study of the peach fruit. In Proceeding of the American Society for Horticultural Science; American Society for Horticultural Science: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1935; Volume 33, pp. 269–279.
  48. Coombe, B.G. The development of fleshy fruits. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1976, 27, 207–228.
  49. Bollard, E.G. The physiology and nutrition of developing fruit. In The Biochemistry of Fruit and Their Products; Hulme, A.C., Rhodes, M.J., Eds.; FAO of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1970; Volume 1.
  50. Lilleland, O.; Newsome, L. A growth study of the cherry fruit. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1934, 32, 291–299.
  51. Chalmers, D.J.; Ende, B.V.D. A reappraisal of the growth and development of peach fruit. Funct. Plant Biol. 1975, 2, 623–634.
  52. Gibeaut, D.M.; Whiting, M.D.; Einhorn, T. Time indices of multiphasic development in genotypes of sweet cherry are similar from dormancy to cessation of pit growth. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 465–475.
  53. Tukey, H.B.; Young, J.O. Histological study of the developing fruit of the sour cherry. Bot. Gaz. 1939, 100, 723–749.
  54. Farmer, J.B. Contributions to the morphology and physiology of pulpy fruits. Ann. Bot. 1889, 3, 393–414.
  55. Winton, A.L. The anatomy of edible berries. Am. J. Pharm. (1835–1907) 1904, 439, 533.
  56. Kapoor, L.; Simkin, A.J.; George Priya Doss, C.; Siva, R. Fruit ripening: Dynamics and integrated analysis of carotenoids and anthocyanins. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 27.
  57. Fukano, Y.; Tachiki, Y. Evolutionary ecology of climacteric and non-climacteric fruits. Biol. Lett. 2021, 17, 20210352.
  58. Paul, V.; Pandey, R.; Srivastava, G.C. The fading distinctions between classical patterns of ripening in climacteric and non-climacteric fruit and the ubiquity of ethylene-An overview. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 1–21.
  59. Klee, H.J.; Giovannoni, J.J. Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 41–59.
  60. Giovannoni, J.J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 2004, 16 (Suppl. 1), S170–S180.
  61. Setha, S.; Kondo, S.; Hirai, N.; Ohigashi, H. Quantification of ABA and its metabolites in sweet cherries usingdeuterium-labeled internal standards. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 45, 183–188.
  62. Gong, Y.; Fan, X.; Mattheis, J.P. Responses of ‘Bing’ and ‘Rainier’ sweet cherries to ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. JASHS 2002, 127, 831–835.
  63. Li, S.; Andrews, P.K.; Patterson, M.E. Effects of ethephon on the respiration and ethylene evolution of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit at different development stages. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1994, 4, 235–243.
  64. Kondo, S.; Gemma, H. Relationship between Abscisic Acid (ABA) content and maturation of the sweet cherry. J. JPN Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1993, 62, 63–68.
  65. Hartmann, C. Biochemical changes in harvested cherries. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1992, 1, 231–240.
  66. Kondo, S.; Inoue, K. Abscisic acid (ABA) and 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid (ACC) content during growth of ‘Satohnishiki’ cherry fruit, and the effect of ABA and ethephon application on fruit quality. J. Hortic. Sci. 1997, 72, 221–227.
  67. Ishiguro, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Nishimura, K.; Satoh, I. Changes of fruit characteristics and respiration in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) during ripening. J. JPN Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1993, 62, 146–147.
  68. Hartmann, C. Ethylene and ripening of a non-climacteric fruit: The cherry. Acta Hortic. 1989, 258, 89–96.
  69. Ren, J.; Chen, P.; Dai, S.J.; Li, P.; Li, Q.; Ji, K.; Wang, Y.P.; Leng, P. Role of abscisic acid and ethylene in sweet cherry fruit maturation: Molecular aspects. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2011, 39, 161–174.
  70. Castellarin, S.D.; Gambetta, G.A.; Wada, H.; Krasnow, M.N.; Cramer, G.R.; Peterlunger, E.; Shackel, K.A.; Matthews, M.A. Characterization of major ripening events during softening in grape: Turgor, sugar accumulation, abscisic acid metabolism, colour development, and their relationship with growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 67, 709–722.
  71. Zhang, M.; Yuan, B.; Leng, P. The role of ABA in triggering ethylene biosynthesis and ripening of tomato fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1579–1588.
  72. Coombe, B.G.; Hale, C.R. The hormone content of ripening grape berries and the effects of growth substance treatments. Plant Physiol. 1973, 51, 629–634.
  73. Luo, H.; Dai, S.; Ren, J.; Zhang, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, Z.; Sun, Y.; Ji, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; et al. The role of ABA in the maturation and postharvest life of a monclimacteric sweet cherry fruit. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 373–383.
  74. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493.
  75. Smeriglio, A.; Barreca, D.; Bellocco, E.; Trombetta, D. Chemistry, pharmacology and health benefits of anthocyanins. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1265–1286.
  76. Clayton-Cuch, D.; Yu, L.; Shirley, N.; Bradley, D.; Bulone, V.; Böttcher, C. Auxin treatment enhances anthocyanin production in the non-climacteric sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10760.
  77. Kappel, F.; Fisher-Fleming, B.; Hogue, E. Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. HortScience 1996, 31, 443–446.
  78. Zheng, X.; Yue, C.; Gallardo, K.; McCracken, V.; Luby, J.; McFerson, J. What attributes are consumers looking for in sweet cherries? Evidence from choice experiments. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2016, 45, 124–142.
  79. Guyer, D.E.; Sinha, N.K.; Chang, T.S.; Cash, J.N. Physiochemical and sensory characteristics of selected Michigan sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. J. Food Qual. 1993, 16, 355–370.
  80. Cliff, M.A.; Dever, M.C.; Hall, J.W.; Giraud, B. Development and evaluation of multiple regression models for predicting sweet cherry liking. Food Res. Int. 1996, 28, 583–589.
  81. Lyngstad, L.; Sekse, L. Economic aspects of developing a high sweet cherry product in Norway. Acta Hortic. 1995, 379, 313–320.
  82. Sekse, L.; Lyngstad, L. Strategies for maintaining high quality in sweet cherries during harvesting, handling and marketing. Acta Hortic. 1996, 410, 351–355.
  83. Wermund, U.; Fearne, A. Key challenges facing the cherry supply chain in the UK. Acta Hortic. 2000, 536, 613–624.
  84. Crisosto, C.H.; Crisosto, G.M.; Metheney, P. Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 28, 159–167.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback