Influence of plasticizer´s polarity on mechanical stability: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Polymer Science
Contributor: ,

The influence of the polarity of three plasticizers on the mechanical stability of the filler network of four filled styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) compounds is investigated by the  simultaneous mechanical and dielectric analysis (DMA & DEA).

  • plasticizer
  • mechanical stability

1. Introduction

Plasticizers are a widely used additive in rubber compounds [1,2,3,4]. They are particularly important and, as the third-highest ingredient in terms of content level, come in right after rubber and fillers. As processing aids, the plasticizers are added in different concentrations in order to impart rubber products with the desired elastic properties in the operating temperature range [5,6,7,8,9,10].
As a fluid component, the plasticizer migrates in the rubber matrix and its macromolecules are integrated into the polymer chains through intermolecular interactions. Consequently, the intermolecular forces of the polymer chains and the number of free valences in the three-dimensional structure are reduced. The internal space between the polymer chains is thus larger, and the free volume that allows the polymer chains to flow above their glass transition temperature increases [11,12,13,14,15]. This new conformation of the polymer chains, in turn, increases their mobility and enhances the filler distribution in the rubber mixture [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Above a certain percolation threshold, a filler network is formed that reinforces the rubber compounds and provides the necessary mechanical stability [16,17]. This applies to both the carbon-based fillers such as carbon black and silica [18,19,20,21]. Indeed, the plasticizer type strongly affects the mechanical properties of rubber products due to a shift in the glass transition temperature. Consequently, the strain, the mechanical stress, the modulus of elasticity and the damping behavior change [22,23,24].
Furthermore, the dielectric properties of rubber samples filled with electrically conductive filler depend on the structure of its filler network [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. This applies to filler networks made of electrically conductive fillers such as carbon-based carbon black or hybrid filler networks, provided that at least one electrically conductive filler is present [25,26,27,28]. The non-conductive component is mainly used because of its excellent mechanical reinforcement, as is the case with silica used in dynamic systems such as car tires [29,30,31,32]. Aloui et al. have shown that mechanically induced changes in the structure of the electrically conductive filler network have a direct impact on dielectric mechanisms such as charge transport and polarization [33,34]. These, in turn, have consequences for the dielectric constant and the dielectric conductivity of rubber samples [35,36,37,38,39].
The direct relationship between mechanical and dielectric properties makes simultaneous mechanical and dielectric analysis of rubber samples filled with electrically conductive filler an outstanding technique for opening up new horizons in evaluating the microstructure dynamics of rubber materials under mechanical load and hence reproducing authentic situations from operation modes [40,41,42,43]. In addition to quality measurements on test samples, examinations on installed end products can also be guaranteed if sensors are installed to record the current material properties during use and to monitor them in the subsequent step. Mainly the dielectric properties are used as a response to the mechanical load [44].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/polym14102126

This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service