Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 in Cancer Therapy: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Harald Wajant
,

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 2 (TNFR2) is a type I transmembrane protein and a prototypic member of the TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF). TNFR2 belongs to the TRAF (TNF-receptor-associated factor)-interacting subgroup of the TNFRSF and mediates pro-inflammatory effects, but can also stimulate strong anti-inflammatory activities. TNFR2 is  stimulated by the membrane-bound form of TNF (memTNF). TNFR2 expression is typically high in myeloid cells but is also found in certain T- and B-cell subsets and a few non-immune cells such as endothelial cells, glial cells and cardiomyocytes.

  • regulatory T-cell (Treg)
  • tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
  • TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2)

1. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Receptor-2 (TNFR2)  in Cancer

1.1. TNFR2 in Tumor Immune Escape

Tumor escape from the immune system is a central step in tumor development. Loss of antigenicity, loss of immunogenicity and an immunosuppressive microenvironment are the three main mechanisms of tumor immune escape [1]. Thus far, the relevance of TNFR2 for immune escape has mainly been attributed to the beneficial effects of TNFR2 on immunosuppressive tumor-infiltrating Tregs and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [2]. Furthermore, earlier studies demonstrating a tumor-promoting function of TNF and IL10-producing regulatory B-cells in DMBA/TPA-induced skin carcinogenesis and the recent finding that TNFR2 stimulates IL10 production of regulatory B-cells open the possibility that TNFR2 engaged Bregs also contributes to the anti-inflammatory pro-tumoral effects of TNFR2 [3][4].
Tumor-infiltrating regulatory T-cells are, with high frequency, strongly positive for TNFR2 [5]. For example, in breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and lung cancer, the highest TNFR2 expression levels were found on Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ Tregs [6][7][8][9]. Interestingly, there is evidence that chemotherapy affects the TNFR2+ Treg pool in triple-negative breast tumors more severely than the infiltrating CD8+ T-cells, so in this special treatment situation, the anti-tumoral TNFR2 activities prevail [10].
As discussed before, TNFR2+ Tregs represent the most suppressive fraction of Foxp3+ cells and activation of TNFR2 on Tregs by memTNF comes along with increased proliferation and phenotypic stability [11][12]. Soluble TNFR2 is significantly higher in samples of malignant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) than in corresponding benign neoplasias and is associated with tumor differentiation [13]. Moreover, TNFR2+ Tregs are abundant in the ascites of ovarian tumor patients and have higher suppressive activity than peripheral blood TNFR2+ Tregs [14]. Notably, antagonistic TNFR2-specific antibodies trigger cell death more potently in Tregs isolated from the ascites of ovarian cancer patients than in Tregs of healthy donors [15]. Furthermore, for tumor ascites from patients with EOC revealed that high levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 were present in the analyzed ascites. Culturing T-cells with EOC ascites leads to an increased TNFR2-expression on all analyzed T-cell subsets and an increased ratio of Tregs/Teffs. In addition, those cultured Tregs express higher levels of immunosuppressive molecules such as programmed cell death ligand-1 (PDL1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) [16], both molecules with an overwhelming importance for tumors to evade the immune system. Increased expression of CTLA4 and PDL1 was also reported for TNFR2+ Tregs derived of lung cancer patients [8][9]. Like IL6, TNF can also upregulate PDL1 expression. Lim and colleagues found out that TNF stabilizes the expression of PDL1 on cancer cells [17]. Mechanistically, TNF activates NFκB signaling, which induces COP9 signalosome 5 (CSN5) expression. CSN5 itself inhibits ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of PDL1. However, whether this mechanism is also of relevance in Tregs is unclear.
The concentrations of soluble TNFR1 and TNFR2 and TNF are significantly increased in sera of AML patients [18][19]. Furthermore, various mouse models of AML with distinct genetic abnormalities showed that autocrine TNF production and TNFR activation by AML cells, especially leukemia-initiating cells, make a crucial contribution to tumor progression through NFκB and JNK-mediated survival signaling [19][20][21], which might antagonize tonic TNF-driven necroptotic signaling [22]. In a FLT3-ITD driven model of AML, however, TNFR or RIPK3 knockout also resulted in enhanced leukemogenesis [23]. These seemingly contrasting results possibly reflect differences in the way the balances between cytotoxic and survival pathways in general has been adjusted in the various models due to genetic factors or differences in the micromilieu. It is, however, also possible that subtle, model-specific differences in the activity of distinct TNF-TNFR1-TNFR2 signaling network axes (sTNF versus memTNF, thus TNFR1 versus TNFR2 activity, induction of endogenous TNF via TNFR1 and/or TNFR2, TNFR2-mediated TRAF2 depletion, etc.) create these strikingly opposing net effects. In this respect, it is worth mentioning that the RNA N6-methyladenosine reader enzyme YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 2 (YTHDF2) promotes AML and reduces cytotoxic TNF sensitivity of preleukemic cells by suppressing TNFR2 expression [24][25]. Indeed, in accordance with the idea that this mirrors the ability of TNFR2 to sensitize for TNFR1-induced cell death signaling by restricting the availability of TRAF2-cIAP/1/2 complexes, SMAC mimetics which deplete cIAPs by triggering their proteasomal autodegradation also sensitizes AML cells for autocrine TNF-induced necroptosis [26].
Tregs have been shown to possess additional mechanisms for inhibiting the induction of inflammatory pathways beyond the secretion/expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, e.g., the release of soluble TNFR2 (sTNFR2). Shedding of the TNFR2 ectodomain, similarly to membrane TNF processing, is mediated by TACE/ADAM17 [27] and is often enhanced under inflammatory circumstances. In particular, sTNFR2 is released from CD4+ T-cells after stimulation with TNF or agonistic TNFR2-specific antibodies [28] while stimulation of TNFR1, but not TNFR2, results in enhanced TNFR2 ectodomain shedding in neutrophils [29][30]. Therefore, sTNFR2 can reflect previous or ongoing activation of TNFR2 and/or TNFR1. sTNFR2 released from activated Tregs can scavenge TNF, and thereby prevents the inflammatory effects of TNF and can maintain the immunosuppressive function of Tregs against Teffs [31]. Additionally, high serum-levels of sTNFR2 serve as prognostic marker with poor clinical outcome in various cancer types [32][33][34][35].
Similar to Tregs, MDSCs can promote tumor immune escape. It is therefore not surprising that many tumors also show an increased number of MDSCs [36]. MDSCs suppress anti-tumor immune responses through several mechanisms; for example, by producing NO and ROS, depletion of cysteine or release of IL10 and TGFβ [37]. Tumor cells themselves release many of the stimulating factors of myelopoiesis, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), stem-cell factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), all of which promote the development of MDSCs [38][39][40]. In 2012, Hu et al. demonstrated that memTNF promotes tumor growth, tumor progression and angiogenesis [41]. This came along with increasing numbers of MDSCs and Tregs in the TME, with poor lymphocyte infiltration and higher levels of NO, IL10 and TGFβ. Vice versa, a tumor model missing memTNF expression showed higher numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and reduced accumulation of MDSCs [41]. Studies with wildtype and TNFR2-deficient MDSCs showed furthermore that memTNF via TNFR2 upregulates CXCR4 expression, and thereby enables chemotactic migration of MDSCs to the tumor microenvironment [42].
Metastasis, and thus the successful colonization of tumor cells at distant sites and their subsequent adaption and growth, is pathophysiological, and typically the most life-threatening step in tumor development [43]. An early event when tumor cells have invaded the liver can be the expression of TNF [44]. For investigating the role of TNF in liver metastasis with the help of TNFR1 and TNFR2 knockout mice, it was found that TNFR2 deficiency, but not lack of TNFR1, results in a significant reduction in liver metastasis in colon and lung carcinoma tumor model [45]. Furthermore, TNFR2 deficiency and reduced metastasis were correlated with decreased amounts of CD11b+ and Gr1+ MDSCs and less Tregs in metastases site [45]. Remarkably, the pro-metastatic activity of TNFR2, which is evident from this study, turned out to be female specific, as in male mice, loss of TNFR2 did not result in a reduced amount of liver metastasis [46]. Furthermore, these findings correlated with the estrogen level and the finding that estrogen induces TNFR2 expression in isolated splenocytes [46]. Thus, reduced numbers of liver metastases were detected in ovariectomized female C57BL/6 mice, and this could be reverted by estradiol reconstitution. Moreover, Tregs and MDSCs of ovariectomized mice show reduced TNFR2 expression and reduced T-cell suppressive activity [46]. It is worth mentioning that TNFR2 might not only promote metastasis through the stimulating effect of TNFR2 on immune suppressive cells, but possibly also by affecting the activity of NK cells. It has been found that the expression of the immunosuppressive NKp30C isoform in gastrointestinal stromal tumors is tightly associated with autocrine TNF/TNFR2-induced upregulation of TRAF1 and cIAP2, along with downregulation of the activating NK cell-receptor NKp46 [47]. However, the possible causal relationship of this correlation remains to be clarified.

1.2. TNFR2 as An Oncogene

Aberrant expression of TNFR2 in certain cancers is accompanied by poor survival prognosis. As already discussed above, sTNFR2 levels are associated with poor survival prognosis in multiple myeloma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, colorectal cancer, cutaneous non-Hodgkin’s disease and ovarian cancer [32][33][34][35][48]. Similarly, increased TNFR2 expression correlating with tumor size and clinical stage was reported for breast cancer [49]. High TNFR2 expression has also been found to be associated with shorter survival of patients suffering from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [50] and recently a systemic screening of almost 800 tumor cell lines derived of different cancer types revealed widespread TNFR2 expression, not unexpected especially in hematopoietic and lymphoid cancer cell lines [2]. These clinical data suggest that TNFR2 might also show pro-tumoral behavior within the tumor cell itself.
The pro-tumoral activities of TNFR2 must not necessarily originate from its role in specifying the properties of the TME but can also be based directly on oncogenic TNFR2 activities. Early on, it was found in a mouse model of DMBA/TPA-induced skin cancerogenesis that, particularly at the beginning of skin-tumor development, TNF is a major factor driving dermal inflammation and keratinocyte hyperproliferation [51][52]. Follow-up studies with TNFR1 and TNFR2 knockout mice revealed a crucial role of TNFR1 in skin cancerogenesis in this model, but also showed a significant contribution of TNFR2. These in vivo data correlated with in vitro studies showing a dominant role of TNFR1 in TNF-induced expression of GM-CSF and MMP9 in primary keratinocytes, but also a clear reduction in the inducibility of these factors in the absence of TNFR2 [53].
In a rare type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with poor clinical outcome, the Sezary Syndrome (SS), TNFR2 point mutations and aberrant gene duplications covering the TNFR2 gene locus lead to increased proliferation and cell growth due to enhanced NFκB signaling [54]. Likewise, TNFR2 promotes cancer-cell proliferation in colorectal cancer (CRC). Analysis of CRC tissue through immunohistochemistry revealed that high TNFR2 expression in the cancer cells is associated with higher expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 [55]. Furthermore, stable expression of TNFR2 in the SW1116 cell line enhanced proliferation in this study, while silencing of TNFR2 in the HT29 cell line reduced proliferation [55]. TNFR2 upregulation lead to enhanced protein kinase B (AKT) activity, suggesting that TNFR2 drives CRC progression via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway [55]. TNFR2 upregulation in colonic epithelial cells has also been reported in TNF-dependent cancer development associated with AOM/DSS-induced colitis [56]. Furthermore, follow-up studies gave evidence that TNFR2-induced MLCK expression disrupted tight junctions and thereby promoted cancerogenesis by triggering epithelial cell proliferation through luminal bacteria-induced inflammation [57].
It is well known that hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) show abnormal compensatory proliferation in conditions of inflammation and tissue damage [58]. Indeed, TNF, presumably acting via TNFR2 and STAT3, has been identified as a crucial factor of HPC activation in a DEN-induced model of hepatocellular carcinoma [59]. Moreover, TNFR2 was recently identified as a driver of primary liver cancer (PLC) under involvement of YAP (Yes-associated protein) [60]. TNF can activate HPCs, but only TNF-TNFR2 interaction on HPCs leads to malignant transformation driving liver tumorigeneses. In this process, TNFR2 stimulation activates YAP signaling [60], an important component of the Hippo pathway, which regulates organ size and tumorigeneses [61]. Phosphorylated YAP is restrained in the cytoplasm and subsequently degraded. However, dephosphorylated YAP can enter the nucleus and, together with transcription factors of the TEAD (transcriptional-enhanced associate domain) transcription factor family, regulates the expression of several target genes [61]. The TNFR2 stimulation on HPCs promotes YAP signaling through the direct binding of heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein K (hnRNPK), thereby stabilizing YAP on target-gene promoters and promoting malignant transformation of HPCs. Furthermore, single-cell RNA sequencing showed that the expression levels of TNFR2, YAP and hnRNPK in PLCs are enhanced and associated with a poor survival prognosis. All these findings point to the TNFR2-YAP axis as an important driver of HPC progression to PLC [60].
TNF has also been identified as a promoter of tumorigenesis in mice expressing the neu/erbB2 oncogene in the mammary epithelium or under control of the murine mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat [62][63][64]. Moreover, as mentioned above, TNFR2 expression has been positively associated with reduced overall survival time and disease-free survival in breast cancer patients [49]. Again, one pro-tumoral mechanism of TNF/TNFR2 signaling in breast cancer cells seems to be activation of the Akt pathway, this time resulting in upregulation of the DNA damage-repair protein poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase [65]. An association of TNF and the Hippo signaling pathway, as discussed above for liver cancer, has also been noted in breast-cancer-cell migration [66]. However, the role of TNFR2 has not been investigated in this study. Notably, there is evidence that TNFR2 can also act as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer. It has been observed that the loss of one TNFR2 allele in breast-cancer-prone MMTV-Wnt1 mice results in ductal hyperplasia in the mammary gland, higher numbers of mammary epithelial stem cells and last but not least, in an increased incidence of tumors with an aggressive metastatic phenotype [67]. The underlying mechanisms are poorly investigated but may involve autocrine TNF production [67].

2. TNFR2 as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer

2.1. Antagonistic Anti-TNFR2 Antibodies in Preclinical Tumor Models

Antagonistic anti-TNFR2 antibodies have been frequently used in vitro in the TNF field to differentiate between TNFR1- and TNFR2-mediated effects but there is also some in vivo experience with antagonistic TNFR2 antibodies. Antagonistic anti-TNFR2 antibodies are characterized by binding to TNFR2 in a way that prevents ligand binding. Importantly, anti-TNFR2 antibodies typically elicit strong agonism when presented in FcγR-bound form, irrespective of the epitope recognized [68]. It is therefore crucial for potential in vivo applications of ligand blocking anti-TNFR2 antibodies as TNFR2 antagonists to use them in an IgG isotype lacking/minimizing FcγR binding.
In 2017, Torrey et al. described two dominant antagonistic TNFR2 antibodies, whereby dominant describes the ability of these antibodies to inhibit Treg proliferation and TNFR2 shedding in an FcγR-independent manner and to kill OVCAR3 cells after prolonged incubation [15]. Both of these antagonistic antibodies recognize a similar region within TNFR2, and Torrey et al. speculated that these antibodies “fix” ligand-free TNFR2 dimers in an inactive state with inaccessible TNF-binding sites. The strongest effects with these antibodies were found when Tregs were isolated directly from ovarian cancers in comparison to Tregs from peripheral blood of ovarian cancer patients or healthy donors, indicating some kind of tumor Treg preference. This tumor preference might be explained by the fact that in tumors, the proportion of TNFR2+ Tregs is unusually high compared with healthy tissue, indicating more available targets for TNFR2-specific antibodies or by “priming” events occurring in the tumor microenvironment, making Tregs more dependent on TNFR2 signaling. One of these TNFR2-specific antibodies was also tested for its ability to inhibit CD4 T-cells of Sézary syndrome (SS) patients and various tumor cell lines. TNFR2+ CD4 cancer T-cell frequencies were lowered in response to the treatment and the ratio of Tregs/Teffs was restored compared to healthy controls, confirming the potential of antagonistic TNFR2 antibodies in cancer therapy [69]. An IgG2 mutant (C232S and S233S) of this antibody with a stabilized hinge region and broad separation of antibody arms was found to be particularly active in inhibition of cell growth of cancer cell lines with high TNFR2 expression [2]. Unfortunately, the mechanisms and mode of growth inhibition/cell death of the anti-TNFR2 antibody treated cells were not further investigated in the above-mentioned studies. It is thus unclear how inhibition of TNFR2 signaling translates at the molecular level in these studies in growth inhibition or cell death.
The activation of dendritic cells (DCs) is a goal of many immunotherapies. The stimulation of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) on plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) can induce anti-tumor response in mouse models [70]. However, there is also evidence from ex vivo experiments with human pDCs that this kind of treatment can also trigger the induction of immunosuppressive Tregs [71][72]. The latter finding resulted in initial studies with the aim to boost the immunostimulatory effect of CpG treatment with the help of antagonistic TNFR2 antibodies (anti-mouse TNFR2 murine IgG1 M831 from Amgen; anti-mouse TNFR2 hamster IgG TR75-54.7, commercially available). In the CT26 mouse model of colon cancer, the administration of the anti-TNFR2 antibody M861 resulted in CpG-treated mice in a decreased number of TNFR2+ Tregs, increasing amounts of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ Teffs and higher survival rates [72]. In addition, after successful therapy, the mice were resistant to repopulation with the same tumor, but not to 4T1 breast cancer cells [72]. One has, however, to take care in the interpretation of these results with respect to the mode of action of the putative antagonistic anti-TNFR2 antibodies. Since these antibodies carries no mutations silencing FcγR interaction, it cannot be ruled out that FcγR-mediated activities or agonism of FcγR-bound antibody molecules contributed to the observed treatment effects. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that the antagonistic hamster anti-mouse TNFR2 antibody TR75-54.7 acts as a TNFR2 agonist after cross-linking in vitro [73] and binds to murine FcγRs II and III [74]. These considerations are also applicable for BI-1808, a fully human antagonistic ligand blocking anti-TNFR2 IgG1 antibody from BioInvent International AB [75], which is currently under investigation in a first clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04752826).

2.2. Anti-TNFR2 Antibody Agonism in Preclinical Tumor Models

In 2019, the mouse TNFR2 specific Y9 antibody has been described [76]. The antibody was generated as mouse IgG2a isotype, has TNF-blocking capabilities and binds to CRD1 of TNFR2. Y9 showed anti-tumor responses in syngeneic mouse models with several mouse cancer cell-lines indicated by CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell expansion, with increased functionality of CD8+ Teffs, downregulation of memTNF and reduced tumor size. These effects were not accompanied by Treg depletion, but FcγR interaction was necessary, suggesting that the agonism of FcγR-bound antibody molecules is important [76]. Similar results were obtained with agonistic TNFR2 antibodies in a CT26 syngeneic tumor model [74]. TNFR2 can also be efficiently and selectively engaged using recombinant oligomeric TNFR2-specific TNF mutants [77], but these reagents have not been tested yet in cancer models.
In addition to the anti-TNFR2 antibodies discussed above, several more are currently in preclinical/commercial development. Unfortunately, only a few peer-reviewed publications are available for most of these antibodies. Most often, these antibodies were only briefly presented at conferences, so a generalized consideration which strategy for TNFR2 targeting is best suited for which disease type is currently not possible.

2.3. TNFR2 Targeting and Immune Checkpoint Blockade

To further improve clinical outcome, combination therapies of agonistic TNFR2-targeting reagents with other anti-cancer drugs or biologicals are considered. An obvious possible approach is the combination of TNFR2 agonists with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Over the last few decades, immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint molecules such as CTLA-4 (e.g., Ipilimumab) or PDL1 (e.g., Avelumab) have shown great efficacy. Nevertheless, these therapies can promote undesirable autoimmune effects and only 30 % of treated patients show a good anti-tumor response. By Tam et al. [76], the combination of the anti-TNFR2 antibody Y9 with its assumed FcγR-dependent agonism and a PDL1 blocking antibody resulted in superior anti-tumor activity. Furthermore, case and colleagues combined PD1 blockade with one of the antagonistic TNFR2 antibodies described by [15] in mouse colon cancer models (CT26 and MC38). The combination therapy exceeded the efficacy of the two corresponding monotherapies. The combination therapy led to a reduction in immunosuppressive Tregs and a normalization of the Treg/Teff ratio. Moreover, the best results were obtained when both blocking antibodies were administered simultaneously and not administered at different time-points [78]. Since the anti-TNFR2 antibody used was not silent for FcγR binding, the mode of action of the anti-TNFR2 antibody (ADCC of Tregs, TNFR2 blockade, TNFR2 engagement by FcγR-bound antibody molecules) is not fully clear in this study. Indeed, ADCC-mediated depletion of Tregs, along with enhanced activity of CD8+ T-cells, has been identified as the mode of action of the anti-TNFR2 antibody TY101 in a syngeneic murine tumor model [79].
In a genome-wide crispr-Cas9 screen, Vredevoogd et al. [80] identified TRAF2, cIAP1 and cIAP2, but also several other components of the TNF-stimulated TNFR1/TNFR2 signaling network as major factors regulating the T-cell sensitivity of tumors. Follow-up analysis revealed (i) that TNF expression in untreated cancers does not correlate with survival, but also revealed a positive correlation with responders of anti-PD1 therapy; (ii) that TRAF2 deficiency sensitizes tumor cells for the cytotoxic action of CD8+ T cell-derived TNF and (iii) that TWEAK-induced Fn14 activation sensitizes cancer cells for killing by CD8+ T cell-derived TNF-induced cell death by virtue of depletion of the available pool of TRAF2-cIAP1/2 complexes, thus by similar mechanisms as already described for TNFR2 (see also 2.) [80]. Thus, for TNFR2-expressing tumor cells, TNFR2 agonists may not only improve TNF release by CD8+ T-cells, but may also sensitize the tumor cells for TNF-induced cell death. Indeed, TNFR2 has been identified as a molecular marker for ALL patients who have a good chance to respond to cIAP1/2 antagonists, such as birinapant, and this is associated with TNFR2-dependent recruitment of RIPK1 to TNFR1 and RIPK1-mediated cell death [81]. In summation, these recent findings prompt testing therapeutic strategies combining anti-PD1 checkpoint blockade with Fn14 activation to sensitize cancer cells for TNF killing and/or TNFR2 activation to enhance CD8+ T-cell activation and TNF release.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cancers14112603

References

  1. Beatty, G.L.; Gladney, W.L. Immune escape mechanisms as a guide for cancer immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 687–692.
  2. Yang, M.; Tran, L.; Torrey, H.; Song, Y.; Perkins, H.; Case, K.; Zheng, H.; Takahashi, H.; Kuhtreiber, W.M.; Faustman, D.L. Optimizing TNFR2 antagonism for immunotherapy with tumor microenvironment specificity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 107, 971–980.
  3. Ticha, O.; Moos, L.; Wajant, H.; Bekeredjian-Ding, I. Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 Characterizes TLR9-Driven Formation of Interleukin-10-Producing B Cells. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1951.
  4. Schioppa, T.; Moore, R.; Thompson, R.G.; Rosser, E.C.; Kulbe, H.; Nedospasov, S.; Mauri, C.; Coussens, L.M.; Balkwill, F.R. B regulatory cells and the tumor-promoting actions of TNF-α during squamous carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 10662–10667.
  5. Teng, M.W.; Ritchie, D.S.; Neeson, P.; Smyth, M.J. Biology and clinical observations of regulatory T cells in cancer immunology. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2011, 344, 61–95.
  6. Ghods, A.; Mehdipour, F.; Shariat, M.; Talei, A.R.; Ghaderi, A. Regulatory T cells express Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 with the highest intensity among CD4(+) T cells in the draining lymph nodes of breast cancer. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 137, 52–56.
  7. Wang, M.; Zhang, C.; Tian, T.; Zhang, T.; Wang, R.; Han, F.; Zhong, C.; Hua, M.; Ma, D. Increased Regulatory T Cells in Peripheral Blood of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Rely on Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α-TNF Receptor-2 Pathway. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1274.
  8. Ye, L.L.; Peng, W.B.; Niu, Y.R.; Xiang, X.; Wei, X.S.; Wang, Z.H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.Y.; Chen, X.; Zhou, Q. Accumulation of TNFR2-expressing regulatory T cells in malignant pleural effusion of lung cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 1647.
  9. Yan, F.; Du, R.; Wei, F.; Zhao, H.; Yu, J.; Wang, C.; Zhan, Z.; Ding, T.; Ren, X.; Chen, X.; et al. Expression of TNFR2 by regulatory T cells in peripheral blood is correlated with clinical pathology of lung cancer patients. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. CII 2015, 64, 1475–1485.
  10. Baram, T.; Erlichman, N.; Dadiani, M.; Balint-Lahat, N.; Pavlovski, A.; Meshel, T.; Morzaev-Sulzbach, D.; Gal-Yam, E.N.; Barshack, I.; Ben-Baruch, A. Chemotherapy Shifts the Balance in Favor of CD8+ TNFR2+ TILs in Triple-Negative Breast Tumors. Cells 2021, 10, 1429.
  11. Urbano, P.C.M.; Koenen, H.; Joosten, I.; He, X. An Autocrine TNFα-Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 Loop Promotes Epigenetic Effects Inducing Human Treg Stability In Vitro. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 573.
  12. Okubo, Y.; Mera, T.; Wang, L.; Faustman, D.L. Homogeneous expansion of human T-regulatory cells via tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3153.
  13. Nomelini, R.S.; Borges Júnior, L.E.; de Lima, C.A.; Chiovato, A.F.C.; Micheli, D.C.; Tavares-Murta, B.M.; Murta, E.F.C. TNF-R2 in tumor microenvironment as prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 18, 547–554.
  14. Govindaraj, C.; Scalzo-Inguanti, K.; Madondo, M.; Hallo, J.; Flanagan, K.; Quinn, M.; Plebanski, M. Impaired Th1 immunity in ovarian cancer patients is mediated by TNFR2+ Tregs within the tumor microenvironment. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 149, 97–110.
  15. Torrey, H.; Butterworth, J.; Mera, T.; Okubo, Y.; Wang, L.; Baum, D.; Defusco, A.; Plager, S.; Warden, S.; Huang, D.; et al. Targeting TNFR2 with antagonistic antibodies inhibits proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and tumor-associated Tregs. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaaf8608.
  16. Kampan, N.C.; Madondo, M.T.; McNally, O.M.; Stephens, A.N.; Quinn, M.A.; Plebanski, M. Interleukin 6 Present in Inflammatory Ascites from Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Promotes Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2-Expressing Regulatory T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1482.
  17. Lim, S.O.; Li, C.W.; Xia, W.; Cha, J.H.; Chan, L.C.; Wu, Y.; Chang, S.S.; Lin, W.C.; Hsu, J.M.; Hsu, Y.H.; et al. Deubiquitination and Stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 925–939.
  18. Vinante, F.; Rigo, A.; Tecchio, C.; Morosato, L.; Nadali, G.; Ricetti, M.M.; Krampera, M.; Zanolin, E.; Locatelli, F.; Gallati, H.; et al. Serum levels of p55 and p75 soluble TNF receptors in adult acute leukaemia at diagnosis: Correlation with clinical and biological features and outcome. Br. J. Haematol. 1998, 102, 1025–1034.
  19. Volk, A.; Li, J.; Xin, J.; You, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Xiao, Y.; Breslin, P.; Li, Z.; Wei, W.; et al. Co-inhibition of NF-κB and JNK is synergistic in TNF-expressing human AML. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 1093–1108.
  20. Li, J.; Volk, A.; Zhang, J.; Cannova, J.; Dai, S.; Hao, C.; Hu, C.; Sun, J.; Xu, Y.; Wei, W.; et al. Sensitizing leukemia stem cells to NF-κB inhibitor treatment in vivo by inactivation of both TNF and IL-1 signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 8420–8435.
  21. Kagoya, Y.; Yoshimi, A.; Kataoka, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Kumano, K.; Arai, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Saito, T.; Iwakura, Y.; Kurokawa, M. Positive feedback between NF-κB and TNF-α promotes leukemia-initiating cell capacity. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 528–542.
  22. Xin, J.; You, D.; Breslin, P.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Wei, W.; Cannova, J.; Volk, A.; Gutierrez, R.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Sensitizing acute myeloid leukemia cells to induced differentiation by inhibiting the RIP1/RIP3 pathway. Leukemia 2017, 31, 1154–1165.
  23. Höckendorf, U.; Yabal, M.; Herold, T.; Munkhbaatar, E.; Rott, S.; Jilg, S.; Kauschinger, J.; Magnani, G.; Reisinger, F.; Heuser, M.; et al. RIPK3 Restricts Myeloid Leukemogenesis by Promoting Cell Death and Differentiation of Leukemia Initiating Cells. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 75–91.
  24. Chen, Z.; Shao, Y.L.; Wang, L.L.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.B.; Ding, Y.; Gao, B.B.; Liu, D.H.; Gao, X.N. YTHDF2 is a potential target of AML1/ETO-HIF1α loop-mediated cell proliferation in t(8;21) AML. Oncogene 2021, 40, 3786–3798.
  25. Paris, J.; Morgan, M.; Campos, J.; Spencer, G.J.; Shmakova, A.; Ivanova, I.; Mapperley, C.; Lawson, H.; Wotherspoon, D.A.; Sepulveda, C.; et al. Targeting the RNA m(6)A Reader YTHDF2 Selectively Compromises Cancer Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 25, 137–148.
  26. Safferthal, C.; Rohde, K.; Fulda, S. Therapeutic targeting of necroptosis by Smac mimetic bypasses apoptosis resistance in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1487–1502.
  27. Bell, J.H.; Herrera, A.H.; Li, Y.; Walcheck, B. Role of ADAM17 in the ectodomain shedding of TNF-alpha and its receptors by neutrophils and macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 82, 173–176.
  28. Torrey, H.; Kühtreiber, W.M.; Okubo, Y.; Tran, L.; Case, K.; Zheng, H.; Vanamee, E.; Faustman, D.L. A novel TNFR2 agonist antibody expands highly potent regulatory T cells. Sci. Signal. 2020, 13, eaba9600.
  29. Black, R.A.; Rauch, C.T.; Kozlosky, C.J.; Peschon, J.J.; Slack, J.L.; Wolfson, M.F.; Castner, B.J.; Stocking, K.L.; Reddy, P.; Srinivasan, S.; et al. A metalloproteinase disintegrin that releases tumour-necrosis factor-alpha from cells. Nature 1997, 385, 729–733.
  30. Dri, P.; Gasparini, C.; Menegazzi, R.; Cramer, R.; Albéri, L.; Presani, G.; Garbisa, S.; Patriarca, P. TNF-Induced shedding of TNF receptors in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes: Role of the 55-kDa TNF receptor and involvement of a membrane-bound and non-matrix metalloproteinase. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 2165–2172.
  31. van Mierlo, G.J.; Scherer, H.U.; Hameetman, M.; Morgan, M.E.; Flierman, R.; Huizinga, T.W.; Toes, R.E. Cutting edge: TNFR-shedding by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells inhibits the induction of inflammatory mediators. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 2747–2751.
  32. Babic, A.; Shah, S.M.; Song, M.; Wu, K.; Meyerhardt, J.A.; Ogino, S.; Yuan, C.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Chan, A.T.; Stampfer, M.J.; et al. Soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor type II and survival in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2016, 114, 995–1002.
  33. Heemann, C.; Kreuz, M.; Stoller, I.; Schoof, N.; von Bonin, F.; Ziepert, M.; Löffler, M.; Jung, W.; Pfreundschuh, M.; Trümper, L.; et al. Circulating levels of TNF receptor II are prognostic for patients with peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 3637–3647.
  34. Tarhini, A.A.; Lin, Y.; Yeku, O.; LaFramboise, W.A.; Ashraf, M.; Sander, C.; Lee, S.; Kirkwood, J.M. A four-marker signature of TNF-RII, TGF-α, TIMP-1 and CRP is prognostic of worse survival in high-risk surgically resected melanoma. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 19.
  35. Warzocha, K.; Bienvenu, J.; Ribeiro, P.; Moullet, I.; Dumontet, C.; Neidhardt-Berard, E.M.; Coiffier, B.; Salles, G. Plasma levels of tumour necrosis factor and its soluble receptors correlate with clinical features and outcome of Hodgkin’s disease patients. Br. J. Cancer 1998, 77, 2357–2362.
  36. Ostrand-Rosenberg, S.; Sinha, P. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: Linking inflammation and cancer. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4499–4506.
  37. Gabrilovich, D.I.; Nagaraj, S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 162–174.
  38. Gabrilovich, D.; Ishida, T.; Oyama, T.; Ran, S.; Kravtsov, V.; Nadaf, S.; Carbone, D.P. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits the development of dendritic cells and dramatically affects the differentiation of multiple hematopoietic lineages in vivo. Blood 1998, 92, 4150–4166.
  39. Pan, P.Y.; Wang, G.X.; Yin, B.; Ozao, J.; Ku, T.; Divino, C.M.; Chen, S.H. Reversion of immune tolerance in advanced malignancy: Modulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cell development by blockade of stem-cell factor function. Blood 2008, 111, 219–228.
  40. Serafini, P.; Carbley, R.; Noonan, K.A.; Tan, G.; Bronte, V.; Borrello, I. High-dose granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-producing vaccines impair the immune response through the recruitment of myeloid suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6337–6343.
  41. Hu, X.; Li, B.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Wan, L.; Lin, G.; Yu, M.; Wang, J.; Jiang, X.; Feng, W.; et al. Transmembrane TNF-α promotes suppressive activities of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via TNFR2. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 1320–1331.
  42. Ba, H.; Li, B.; Li, X.; Li, C.; Feng, A.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Yin, B. Transmembrane tumor necrosis factor-α promotes the recruitment of MDSCs to tumor tissue by upregulating CXCR4 expression via TNFR2. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 44, 143–152.
  43. Nguyen, D.X.; Bos, P.D.; Massagué, J. Metastasis: From dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 274–284.
  44. Auguste, P.; Fallavollita, L.; Wang, N.; Burnier, J.; Bikfalvi, A.; Brodt, P. The host inflammatory response promotes liver metastasis by increasing tumor cell arrest and extravasation. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 1781–1792.
  45. Ham, B.; Wang, N.; D’Costa, Z.; Fernandez, M.C.; Bourdeau, F.; Auguste, P.; Illemann, M.; Eefsen, R.L.; Høyer-Hansen, G.; Vainer, B.; et al. TNF Receptor-2 Facilitates an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in the Liver to Promote the Colonization and Growth of Hepatic Metastases. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 5235–5247.
  46. Milette, S.; Hashimoto, M.; Perrino, S.; Qi, S.; Chen, M.; Ham, B.; Wang, N.; Istomine, R.; Lowy, A.M.; Piccirillo, C.A.; et al. Sexual dimorphism and the role of estrogen in the immune microenvironment of liver metastases. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5745.
  47. Ivagnes, A.; Messaoudene, M.; Stoll, G.; Routy, B.; Fluckiger, A.; Yamazaki, T.; Iribarren, K.; Duong, C.P.M.; Fend, L.; Caignard, A.; et al. TNFR2/BIRC3-TRAF1 signaling pathway as a novel NK cell immune checkpoint in cancer. Oncoimmunology 2018, 7, e1386826.
  48. Dobrzycka, B.; Terlikowski, S.J.; Kowalczuk, O.; Kinalski, M. Circulating levels of TNF-alpha and its soluble receptors in the plasma of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2009, 20, 131–134.
  49. Yang, F.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, N. Clinical implications of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 in breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 2393–2398.
  50. Zhang, Y.W.; Chen, Q.Q.; Cao, J.; Xu, L.Q.; Tang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Dong, L.X. Expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 in human non-small cell lung cancer and its role as a potential prognostic biomarker. Thorac. Cancer 2019, 10, 437–444.
  51. Moore, R.J.; Owens, D.M.; Stamp, G.; Arnott, C.; Burke, F.; East, N.; Holdsworth, H.; Turner, L.; Rollins, B.; Pasparakis, M.; et al. Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-alpha are resistant to skin carcinogenesis. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 828–831.
  52. Suganuma, M.; Okabe, S.; Marino, M.W.; Sakai, A.; Sueoka, E.; Fujiki, H. Essential role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in tumor promotion as revealed by TNF-alpha-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 4516–4518.
  53. Arnott, C.H.; Scott, K.A.; Moore, R.J.; Robinson, S.C.; Thompson, R.G.; Balkwill, F.R. Expression of both TNF-alpha receptor subtypes is essential for optimal skin tumour development. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1902–1910.
  54. Ungewickell, A.; Bhaduri, A.; Rios, E.; Reuter, J.; Lee, C.S.; Mah, A.; Zehnder, A.; Ohgami, R.; Kulkarni, S.; Armstrong, R.; et al. Genomic analysis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome identifies recurrent alterations in TNFR2. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1056–1060.
  55. Zhao, T.; Li, H.; Liu, Z. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 promotes growth of colorectal cancer via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 342–346.
  56. Onizawa, M.; Nagaishi, T.; Kanai, T.; Nagano, K.; Oshima, S.; Nemoto, Y.; Yoshioka, A.; Totsuka, T.; Okamoto, R.; Nakamura, T.; et al. Signaling pathway via TNF-alpha/NF-kappaB in intestinal epithelial cells may be directly involved in colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009, 296, G850–G859.
  57. Suzuki, M.; Nagaishi, T.; Yamazaki, M.; Onizawa, M.; Watabe, T.; Sakamaki, Y.; Ichinose, S.; Totsuka, M.; Oshima, S.; Okamoto, R.; et al. Myosin light chain kinase expression induced via tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 signaling in the epithelial cells regulates the development of colitis-associated carcinogenesis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88369.
  58. Tummala, K.S.; Brandt, M.; Teijeiro, A.; Graña, O.; Schwabe, R.F.; Perna, C.; Djouder, N. Hepatocellular Carcinomas Originate Predominantly from Hepatocytes and Benign Lesions from Hepatic Progenitor Cells. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 584–600.
  59. Jing, Y.; Sun, K.; Liu, W.; Sheng, D.; Zhao, S.; Gao, L.; Wei, L. Tumor necrosis factor-α promotes hepatocellular carcinogenesis through the activation of hepatic progenitor cells. Cancer Lett. 2018, 434, 22–32.
  60. Meng, Y.; Zhao, Q.; An, L.; Jiao, S.; Li, R.; Sang, Y.; Liao, J.; Nie, P.; Wen, F.; Ju, J.; et al. A TNFR2-hnRNPK axis promotes primary liver cancer development via activation of YAP signaling in hepatic progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 3036–3050.
  61. Patel, S.H.; Camargo, F.D.; Yimlamai, D. Hippo Signaling in the Liver Regulates Organ Size, Cell Fate, and Carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 533–545.
  62. Lucchini, F.; Sacco, M.G.; Hu, N.; Villa, A.; Brown, J.; Cesano, L.; Mangiarini, L.; Rindi, G.; Kindl, S.; Sessa, F.; et al. Early and multifocal tumors in breast, salivary, harderian and epididymal tissues developed in MMTY-Neu transgenic mice. Cancer Lett. 1992, 64, 203–209.
  63. Sangaletti, S.; Tripodo, C.; Ratti, C.; Piconese, S.; Porcasi, R.; Salcedo, R.; Trinchieri, G.; Colombo, M.P.; Chiodoni, C. Oncogene-driven intrinsic inflammation induces leukocyte production of tumor necrosis factor that critically contributes to mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 7764–7775.
  64. Warren, M.A.; Shoemaker, S.F.; Shealy, D.J.; Bshar, W.; Ip, M.M. Tumor necrosis factor deficiency inhibits mammary tumorigenesis and a tumor necrosis factor neutralizing antibody decreases mammary tumor growth in neu/erbB2 transgenic mice. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 2655–2663.
  65. Yang, F.; Zhao, N.; Wu, N. TNFR2 promotes Adriamycin resistance in breast cancer cells by repairing DNA damage. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 2962–2968.
  66. Gao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, F.; Huang, J.; Xu, W.; Mao, B.; Yuan, Z.; Bi, W. TNFα-YAP/p65-HK2 axis mediates breast cancer cell migration. Oncogenesis 2017, 6, e383.
  67. He, L.; Bhat, K.; Duhacheck-Muggy, S.; Ioannidis, A.; Zhang, L.; Nguyen, N.T.; Moatamed, N.A.; Pajonk, F. Tumor necrosis factor receptor signaling modulates carcinogenesis in a mouse model of breast cancer. Neoplasia 2021, 23, 197–209.
  68. Medler, J.; Nelke, J.; Weisenberger, D.; Steinfatt, T.; Rothaug, M.; Berr, S.; Hünig, T.; Beilhack, A.; Wajant, H. TNFRSF receptor-specific antibody fusion proteins with targeting controlled FcγR-independent agonistic activity. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 224.
  69. Torrey, H.; Khodadoust, M.; Tran, L.; Baum, D.; Defusco, A.; Kim, Y.H.; Faustman, D.L. Targeted killing of TNFR2-expressing tumor cells and T(regs) by TNFR2 antagonistic antibodies in advanced Sézary syndrome. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1206–1218.
  70. Guéry, L.; Dubrot, J.; Lippens, C.; Brighouse, D.; Malinge, P.; Irla, M.; Pot, C.; Reith, W.; Waldburger, J.M.; Hugues, S. Ag-presenting CpG-activated pDCs prime Th17 cells that induce tumor regression. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 6430–6440.
  71. Moseman, E.A.; Liang, X.; Dawson, A.J.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; Krieg, A.M.; Liu, Y.J.; Blazar, B.R.; Chen, W. Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells activated by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides induce the generation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 4433–4442.
  72. Nie, Y.; He, J.; Shirota, H.; Trivett, A.L.; Yang, D.; Klinman, D.M.; Oppenheim, J.J.; Chen, X. Blockade of TNFR2 signaling enhances the immunotherapeutic effect of CpG ODN in a mouse model of colon cancer. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaan0790.
  73. Sheehan, K.C.; Pinckard, J.K.; Arthur, C.D.; Dehner, L.P.; Goeddel, D.V.; Schreiber, R.D. Monoclonal antibodies specific for murine p55 and p75 tumor necrosis factor receptors: Identification of a novel in vivo role for p75. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 181, 607–617.
  74. Williams, G.S.; Mistry, B.; Guillard, S.; Ulrichsen, J.C.; Sandercock, A.M.; Wang, J.; González-Muñoz, A.; Parmentier, J.; Black, C.; Soden, J.; et al. Phenotypic screening reveals TNFR2 as a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 68278–68291.
  75. Mårtensson, L.; Kovacek, M.; Holmkvist, P.; Semmrich, M.; Svensson, C.; Blidberg, T.; Carl Roos, C.; McAllister, A.; Demiri, M.; Borggren, M.; et al. 725 Pre-Clinical Development of TNFR2 Ligand-Blocking BI-1808 for Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Immuno Ther. Cancer 2020, 8, A768.
  76. Tam, E.M.; Fulton, R.B.; Sampson, J.F.; Muda, M.; Camblin, A.; Richards, J.; Koshkaryev, A.; Tang, J.; Kurella, V.; Jiao, Y.; et al. Antibody-mediated targeting of TNFR2 activates CD8(+) T cells in mice and promotes antitumor immunity. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaax0720.
  77. Medler, J.; Wajant, H. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2): An overview of an emerging drug target. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2019, 23, 295–307.
  78. Case, K.; Tran, L.; Yang, M.; Zheng, H.; Kuhtreiber, W.M.; Faustman, D.L. TNFR2 blockade alone or in combination with PD-1 blockade shows therapeutic efficacy in murine cancer models. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 107, 981–991.
  79. Jiang, M.; Liu, J.; Yang, D.; Tross, D.; Li, P.; Chen, F.; Alam, M.M.; Faustman, D.L.; Oppenheim, J.J.; Chen, X. A TNFR2 antibody by countering immunosuppression cooperates with HMGN1 and R848 immune stimulants to inhibit murine colon cancer. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 101, 108345.
  80. Vredevoogd, D.W.; Kuilman, T.; Ligtenberg, M.A.; Boshuizen, J.; Stecker, K.E.; de Bruijn, B.; Krijgsman, O.; Huang, X.; Kenski, J.C.N.; Lacroix, R.; et al. Augmenting Immunotherapy Impact by Lowering Tumor TNF Cytotoxicity Threshold. Cell 2019, 178, 585–599.e515.
  81. Aguadé-Gorgorió, J.; McComb, S.; Eckert, C.; Guinot, A.; Marovca, B.; Mezzatesta, C.; Jenni, S.; Abduli, L.; Schrappe, M.; Dobay, M.P.; et al. TNFR2 is required for RIP1-dependent cell death in human leukemia. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 4823–4833.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback