Interaction-Induced Structural Transformations in Polysaccharide and Protein-Polysaccharide Gels: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor: ,

Polysaccharides are biocompatible nontoxic natural polymer compounds. They are widely used as functional soft-matter for exploration in the food industry, drug delivery, regenerative medicine, and other biomedical research and applications. The tunable macroscopic properties of gels should meet case-dependent requirements. The admixture of proteins to polysaccharides and their coupling in more sophisticated structures opens an avenue for gel property tuning via physical cross-linking of components and the modification of gel network structure.

  • protein–polysaccharide gels
  • κ-carrageenan
  • galactan
  • structure
  • crosslinking
  • FTIR-spectroscopy
  • molecular modelling

1. Introduction

Polysaccharides are biocompatible nontoxic natural polymer compounds. They are widely used as functional soft-matter for exploration in the food industry, drug delivery, regenerative medicine, and other biomedical research and applications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Polysaccharides are widely spread in bacterium, plant, and animal nature: produced by algae (alginate and carrageenan), plants (cellulose, pectin, and guar gum), bacterium (dextran and chitin) and animals (hyaluronan, chondroitin, and heparin). Polysaccharides with diversity of chemical modification represent a wide range of molecular weights. This work is devoted to carrageenans, one of the representatives of galactans. Galactans are a unique class of natural polysaccharides, distributed in plants (red algae, lupine seeds, citrus peel, etc.), also found in animals and microorganisms.
Carrageenans are linear, sulfated, hydrophilic non-toxic polysaccharides from red algae. Their molecules consist of galactose repeat units, one ring per disaccharide can be (3,6)-anhydro, connected by alternating α-(1,3)- and β-(1,4)-glycosidic links with a variable proportion of sulfate groups at different positions [9]. There are different types of carrageenans (are widely used in technologic developments), carrying from one to three sulfate groups per monomeric unit of polymer (Figure 1). Among natural galactans the carrageenans are ideal candidates for different applications in wound healing and drug delivery [10]. Together with other sulfated polysaccharides [11], they are often considered as mimetics of glycosaminoglycans (GAG), the matrix polysaccharides of mammals, and have a potential to be used for tissue engineering [12]. In addition, the application of carrageenans is omnipresent in dairy products due to their strong interaction with food proteins [13].
Figure 1. The schematic representation of disaccharide units of carrageenans.
Gels, one of the essential states of polysaccharides, represent a three-dimensional crosslinked polymer network immersed in a confined continuous fluid phase. If the fluid totals more than 90% of volume, it is referred to as hydrogel in the case of water or organogel in the case of organic fluid. Gels are classified as chemical or physical depending on the cross-linker’s nature [14]. In the first case, the polymeric chains are held together by covalent chemical bonds. Mostly technologically advanced are physical hydrogels, which are typical of many natural biopolymers, in which a three-dimensional polymer network exists owing to the mechanical weave of the polymer molecules and/or stabilized by intermolecular interactions, including ionic bridges, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic interactions.

2. Crosslinking in Polysaccharide Gels

The molecular weight of polysaccharides ranging from several hundred thousand to millions of Daltons allows them to form gels at concentrations lower than those required for protein gelation. Usually, less than 1 mass% of polysaccharide is necessary for its gelation via various intermolecular interactions [13]. Gel formation may occur via the long chain entanglement and formation of ordered structures in the junction zones. The packing of chains in junction zones is generally accompanied with the structuring of flexible polysaccharide chains and results in the increase of gel elasticity, whilst the simple entanglement contributes to the gel viscosity. Several types of chain–chain interactions in polysaccharide gels upon chain ordering have been proposed.

2.1. Chain Ordering in Carrageenans

Thermoreversible gels are formed by ι- and κ-carrageenans. The gel melts above a certain temperature and becomes firm when cooled. The firmness of the gel versus temperature may reveal hysteresis being dependent on the process direction. The melting temperature depends on the salt present, that is the type and concentration of counterions. The presence of two sulfate groups per one disaccharide in ι-carrageenan requires divalent cations to screen the repulsion of approaching chains and make a bridge between them stabilizing the gel formation. The κ-carrageenan needs monovalent cations, like K+, and to a lesser extent divalent cations. For λ-carrageenan, its gelation was reported only in the case of the presence of Fe3+ [15]. More detailed information about carrageenan gel rheology can be found in recent reviews on this topic [16][17].
The rheological properties are coupled with structural transitions of the carrageenan chains. The secondary structure changes from the coil to the helix state upon gelling. It still remains a matter of debate if carrageenans form single [18][19] or intertwined double helices [20][21].
The double helix formation with further cation mediated association in stacks is a widely accepted model for the junction zones in carrageenan gels. The double helix formation is supported by a large amount of data [13] including X-ray diffraction [20][22] and ultrasonic relaxation [23]. X-ray diffraction on crystalline ι-carrageenan revealed a parallel three-fold double helix with pitch around 26 Å [24]. Although experimental data for κ-carrageenan cannot be interpreted in terms of geometry [15], the modelling suggests a three-fold double helix with pitch of 25 Å, where both parallel and antiparallel chain orientations are possible [25]. A similar 25 Å pitch of helix was reported for λ-carrageenan [15]. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction on carrageenan solids packed in a form of membranes showed double-helical structure for ι- and κ-carrageenans and a single-helical one for λ-carrageenan [26]. Computer modelling favored a single helix [27].
Using high-resolution AFM microscopy, Schefer et al. [19][28] provided direct evidence of single helix formation in ι- and κ-carrageenans, similar to some other polysaccharides [29]. The monovalent ion-induced coil-helix transition is coupled with non-monotonic tendency of chain stiffening with persistent length variations from 10 to 20 nm [19]. In contrast, in the presence of NaCl, λ-carrageenan retains a random coil conformation [19]. Single helices may laterally associate into supercoils in the fashion of tertiary structure of proteins or/and to coil-coiled helices similar to quaternary structures and after this they can form supramolecular gels [30].
Recently, the researchers group applied Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to provide deeper insights into the coupling of ion binding with coil-helix transitions in κ-carrageenan upon the temperature-induced formation and melting of gels [31]. Because of pronounced overlapping of spectral bands, which is typical for polysaccharides, the set of spectra, recorded along the perturbation coordinate (i.e., temperature), was decomposed into orthogonal variants. Based on the splitting of the νasSO3 complex band (1300–1200 cm−1) the orthogonal variants were attributed to sulfate groups in the free state and with weakly or strongly bound ions. Two orthogonal components in the region of skeletal vibrations (1200–1000 cm−1), interchanging in a cooperative fashion along the temperature, were the hallmark of helical and coil conformation. Further analysis coupled with quantum chemical calculations revealed the following sequence of events [31]: (1) upon cooling down the strong K+ binding becomes prevalent over weak contacts, (2) the strong K+ binding requires the neocarrabiose units to be in a conformation determined by the values of the phi and psi angles as those in the helix; at this stage the “seeds” of helical conformation are stabilized by bound potassium ions, (3) the further cooling of the system results in the full chain conversion to the helix conformation (Figure 2a).
Figure 2. The schematic representation of interchain junctions and the atomistic representation of (a) key interactions in carrageenan, (b) 1,4-β-galactan in RG-I, (c) pectin gels, and (d) in Infernan gel. In the schemes, cations are shown as red balls, side chains are given in green, the location of sulfate groups in Infernan is indicated by yellow semicircles. K+ in the complex with κ-carrageenan is shown in pink and Ca2+ in complex with pectin and Infernan is shown in violet.
The FTIR-spectral patterns of helix and coil conformations of κ-carrageenan can be used for the in situ detection of the polysaccharide conformational state in protein–carrageenan gels.

2.2. 1,4-β-Galactan Crosslinking

Another type of gel formation via galactan chains was reported recently for rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), which is usually present as a hairy region of the pectin molecule. The RG-I from gelatinous fibers of flax, which does not have homogalacturonan fragments and is branched with long 1,4-β-galactan side chains, can form physical gels under microwave irradiation [32]. In this type of gel, the RG-I molecules are entangled by galactan side chains. Interestingly, the 2D-correlation FTIR spectroscopy [33] together with molecular modelling [34] showed that in such gels 1,4-galactan has a regular helical structure, the side chains interact in a side-by-side antiparallel fashion (Figure 2b).

2.3. Egg-Box Assembly in Pectins and Alginates

A famous example of polysaccharide chain fine-tuning via ion cross-linking in gel junction zones is the packing of alginates and pectins in the form of an egg-box. The gelation of alginate, composed of (1→4)- linked α-L-guluronic and β-D-mannuronic residues of varying sequence, takes place under mild conditions with the sol-gel transition independent of temperature. Divalent cations induce chain–chain association by means of physical cross-linkage of guluronic acid blocks of neighboring alginate molecules, known as the “egg-box model” [35]. Another example is the homogalacturonan, a major domain of the pectin molecule, built up by the (1→4)- linked α-D-galacturonate residues. The GalpA residues offer their carboxylate groups for the ion coordination in the form of an egg box [36][37]. A recent review sums up the differences between pectin and alginate structure of the egg-box [38]. The progression of such a structure results in the formation of firm bunches of polysaccharide chains (Figure 2c).
The chain stiffness of a polymer influences its properties and its capability to interact with other molecules [39]. Thus, the polysaccharide chain ordering that effects charge exposure is of high importance for rational design of novel materials. Probing the conformational state of such flexible matter as polysaccharides is a challenging task to which computer methods contribute significantly revealing the statistically relevant cases of both individual molecule conformation in solution and their assembly [40]. Among promising experimental methods to probe the polysaccharide state with high resolution, along with AFM microscopy, a fascinating tool should be mentioned which studies the conformational landscape of an oligosaccharide molecule, sampled by exciting a gas-phase molecular conformer to an ensemble using soft molecule–surface collision [41]. Despite the atomistic depicture of the polymer structure through these methods, the detection of the structure in molecular complexes in soft matter remains challenging. FTIR-spectroscopy is one of the non-destructive methods sensitive to the conformational state of both polysaccharides and proteins, which is able to observe the conformations of both species in gels in situ. It is shown in the next section that the method is highly informative for protein–carrageenan gels where both components have remarkable conformational changes.

3. Protein–Polysaccharide Gels

In recent decades, protein–polysaccharide gels have attracted attention due to the broad variability of the tuning gel properties [42]. Other strategies to tune the carrageenan gel structure and properties include the use of sugar and polyols as cosolvents [43] or the admixture of other polysaccharides [44].
Protein–polysaccharide gels can be formed in mixtures of gelling polysaccharides and non-gelling proteins [45], gelling proteins and non-gelling polysaccharides [46], or when both agents gel [47]. Depending on the chemical structure of the biopolymers and the environmental conditions, the gel network is formed due to interpenetration, phase-separation, or coupling of components [48][49]. In the interpenetrating network, two independent gel networks are formed where each network is made by the individual biopolymer [50][51]. The phase-separated network is formed in segregative conditions upon demixing of protein and polysaccharide, the resultant structure of such gels is determined by the rate of coarsening and crosslinking of the gelling components. Since segregation is stopped by gelling, the final morphology depends on the relative rates of these processes [52][53]. The coupled gel network forms in associative conditions when two biopolymers interact with formation of modified junction zones. Often both mixing and demixing behavior is electrostatically driven [54][55].
The ability of proteins to form binary gels with polysaccharides depends on pH, ionic strength, and type of salt, that determine the balance between attractive and repulsive forces. Eleya and Turgeon [56] reported that β-lactoglobulin, one of the whey proteins, being co-gelled with κ-carrageenan in the course of heating, demonstrates the pH-depending behavior. Above the protein pI, in the region of pH 5–7, the rheological behavior of binary gels upon their formation and melting was attributed to the presence of a phase-separated type of network. While at pH 4.0, below the protein pI, their behavior implies the association of biopolymers with the formation of one continuous network, which significantly enhances the protein gel strength.
Thus, gel formation driven by repulsive forces and phase separation is associated with changes of microstructure to which the rates of demixture and gelling contribute. The microstructure of such gels is rather characterized by spatially separated aggregates of individual components. The apparent changes of gel rheology may be explained by the level of the individual components network intactness and by the increase of the local concentration of components.
When the gel formation is driven by electrostatic attraction the complexation between protein and polysaccharide may lead to a significant alteration of the structure of junction zones. For example, Duran with co-authors [57][58] showed that in quinoa protein–ι-carrageenan gels both biopolymers are synergically responsible for the formation of the gel matrix. The mixtures between the male gonad hydrolysates of scallop Patinopecten yessoensis and κ-carrageenan [59] suggest electrostatic interactions involved in the maintenance of the gel network. In their turn, the protein–polysaccharide complexation via electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions leads to a well-distributed network structure supporting the stronger gel rigidity [59]. The increasing level of ι-carrageenan results in a more compact network of soya meat analogues [60]. Synergistic interactions of κ-carrageenan with milk proteins promote the development of a cross-linked network in whipped cream [61]. The addition of ι-carrageenan to scallop Patinopecten yessoensis male gonad hydrolysates can result in a 116-fold increase of storage modulus compared to that of protein alone [62]. The emulsion-based gels of whey protein isolate with κ- and ι-carrageenans increase the strength and elasticity together with increase of carrageenan content; the network coupled with ι-carrageenan was stronger than that with κ-carrageenan [63]. In turn, the influence of λ-carrageenan on the gel strength was higher than that of ι-carrageenan [64]. Furthermore, the gels formed by κ-carrageenan with hagfish slime show synergistic effects by exhibiting high values of elasticity and viscosity [65]. κ-Carrageenan enhances yolk properties via electrostatic interactions with proteins [66].
Molecular interactions between proteins and polysaccharides occur upon coacervate formation in solution. FTIR- [67] and NMR-spectra [68] can detect the complex formation between charged biopolymers. Le and Turgeon [69] proposed the following mechanism of associative gelation in the β-lactoglobulin and xanthan gum mixtures [42]. The gelation starts by establishing interactions between negatively charged groups of polysaccharide and positively charged moieties of protein with the formation of soluble complexes. Then, along with the change of surface charge of these soluble complexes, interpolymer association occurs where one protein molecule may interact with several polysaccharide chains forming junction zones. This cross-linking process continues further until the completion of the sol-gel transition [69].
Protein–polysaccharide complexation in the cross-linked gel network as well as in coacervates may result in conformational changes in both the protein and polysaccharide, which, in turn, can be one of the factors for the modified gel rheology.
However, despite the fact that the analysis of gel microstructure has accompanied most research dealing with the properties of binary gels, the information about their nano-scale structure and conformational adjustment of counter-parts in complexes is rather scarce.
To have a vision of protein conformation alteration upon binary protein–polysaccharide coacervate formation, some spectroscopic techniques are informative. Several studies report on significant changes in protein secondary structure content. Siddiqui and co-authors [70] reported that purified almond cystatin mixing with λ-carrageenan at 25 °C showed a significant shift in the FTIR-peak intensity, which depicts the helix-to-β-sheet change in the secondary structure of cystatin. The CD spectra confirmed the helix to β-sheet transition. Tang and co-authors [71] observed a decrease of the relative content of α-helixes and β-turns and an increase of β-sheets and random coils in salted duck egg white with the addition of κ-carrageenan. According to the Raman spectroscopy data, a small content of κ-carrageenan promoted the conformational transition of surimi protein from α-helix to β-sheet [72]. In contrast, Zheng and co-authors [73] observed none-to-minimal shift of the β-sheet and the α-helical protein structure in the gels of κ-carrageenan with krill protein isolate. A tendency of globular protein structure to shift from order to disorder was concluded on the basis of low-temperature DSC-curve shift and CD-spectra of lysozyme–κ-carrageenan gels [45].
The conformation of both protein and polysaccharide may be influenced by its counter-part. For example, the unwinding of the ι- and κ-carrageenans double helix was reported to be induced by β-casein [74]. This unwinding is due to preferable electrostatic interaction with the coil polysaccharide chain since the conformational change is fully reversible in conditions of sufficiently high ionic strength [74].
Apparently, in a gel with coupled network the conformational adjustment of polymers, together with the concentration of polymers, pH, and ionic strength, becomes a factor of tunable gel rheology. Then the rational design of the binary composition requires a deep fundamental understanding of structural adjustment upon complex formation. The lack of information about the mutual conformational influence of protein and polysaccharide determines, in particular, the lack of appropriate methodology. CD-spectroscopy, widely useful for protein and polysaccharide conformation probing in solution [75], is not appropriate for gels. Suffering from light scattering, it results in distorted spectra of colloid particles that can mislead the analysis. FTIR-spectroscopy may work with the samples of any phase states, if the characteristic bands of protein and polysaccharides do not overlap (not critical if any) and is suited perfectly to probe simultaneously the conformation of protein and polysaccharide in binary gels in situ. Below, some examples of the application of FTIR-spectroscopy in probing the protein–polysaccharide mutual conformational adjustment in protein–κ-carrageenan gels are given [76][77].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/gels8050287

References

  1. Ali, A.; Ahmed, S. Recent Advances in Edible Polymer Based Hydrogels as a Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Polymers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6940–6967.
  2. Yang, X.; Li, A.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. An overview of classifications, properties of food polysaccharides and their links to applications in improving food textures. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 102, 1–15.
  3. Shelke, N.B.; James, R.; Laurencin, C.T.; Kumbar, S.G. Polysaccharide biomaterials for drug delivery and regenerative engineering. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2014, 25, 448–460.
  4. Suntornnond, R.; An, J.; Chua, C.K. Bioprinting of Thermoresponsive Hydrogels for Next Generation Tissue Engineering: A Review. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1600266.
  5. Beaumont, M.; Tran, R.; Vera, G.; Niedrist, D.; Rousset, A.; Pierre, R.; Shastri, V.P.; Forget, A. Hydrogel-Forming Algae Polysaccharides: From Seaweed to Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 1027–1052.
  6. Kaliva, M.; Kavasi, R.-M.; Chatzinikolaidou, M.; Vamvakaki, M. 4.01—Polysaccharides and Applications in Regenerative Medicine. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Barchi, J.J., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 1–33.
  7. Nakagawa, Y.; Ebara, M. 4.02—Polysaccharides for Drug Delivery: The Development of Polysaccharide-Based Materials and Glycopolymer to Improve Drug Delivery Applications. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Barchi, J.J., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 34–50.
  8. Bogdanova, L.R.; Makarova, A.O.; Zueva, O.S.; Zakharova, L.Y.; Zuev, Y.F. Encapsulation of diagnostic dyes in the polysaccharide matrix modified by carbon nanotubes. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2020, 69, 590–595.
  9. Rees, D.A. Structure, conformation, and mechanism in the formation of polysaccharide gels and networks. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1969, 24, 267–332.
  10. Pettinelli, N.; Rodríguez-Llamazares, S.; Bouza, R.; Barral, L.; Feijoo-Bandín, S.; Lago, F. Carrageenan-based physically crosslinked injectable hydrogel for wound healing and tissue repairing applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 589, 119828.
  11. Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Sinquin, C.; Lebellenger, L.; Zykwinska, A.; Colliec-Jouault, S. Exopolysaccharides produced by marine bacteria and their applications as glycosaminoglycan-like molecules. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 85.
  12. Yegappan, R.; Selvaprithiviraj, V.; Amirthalingam, S.; Jayakumar, R. Carrageenan based hydrogels for drug delivery, tissue engineering and wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 385–400.
  13. Piculell, L. Gelling Carrageenans. In Food Polysaccharides and Their Applications; Stephen, A.M., Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2006; Volume 67, pp. 239–287.
  14. Noferini, D.; Faraone, A.; Rossi, M.; Mamontov, E.; Fratini, E.; Baglioni, P. Disentangling Polymer Network and Hydration Water Dynamics in Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate Physical and Chemical Hydrogels. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 19183–19194.
  15. Running, C.A.; Falshaw, R.; Janaswamy, S. Trivalent Iron Induced Gelation in Lambda-Carrageenan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2735–2739.
  16. Hilliou, L. Structure-Elastic Properties Relationships in Gelling Carrageenans. Polymers 2021, 13, 4120.
  17. Geonzon, L.C.; Descallar, F.B.A.; Du, L.; Bacabac, R.G.; Matsukawa, S. Gelation mechanism and network structure in gels of carrageenans and their mixtures viewed at different length scales—A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106039.
  18. Smidsrød, O.; Grasdalen, H. Some physical properties of carrageenan in solution and gel state. Carbohydr. Polym. 1982, 2, 270–272.
  19. Schefer, L.; Usov, I.; Mezzenga, R. Anomalous Stiffening and Ion-Induced Coil–Helix Transition of Carrageenans under Monovalent Salt Conditions. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 985–991.
  20. Anderson, N.S.; Campbell, J.W.; Harding, M.M.; Rees, D.A.; Samuel, J.W. X-ray diffraction studies of polysaccharide sulphates: Double helix models for k- and l-carrageenans. J. Mol. Biol. 1969, 45, 85–99.
  21. van de Velde, F.; Rollema, H.S.; Grinberg, N.V.; Burova, T.V.; Grinberg, V.Y.; Tromp, R.H. Coil-helix transition of iota-carrageenan as a function of chain regularity. BioPolymers 2002, 65, 299–312.
  22. Arnott, S.; Scott, W.E.; Rees, D.A.; McNab, C.G. Iota-carrageenan: Molecular structure and packing of polysaccharide double helices in oriented fibres of divalent cation salts. J. Mol. Biol. 1974, 90, 253–267.
  23. Gormally, J.; Pereira, M.C.; Wyn-Jones, E.; Morris, E.R. Ultrasonic relaxation of agarose and carrageenan gels. The role of solvent. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 Mol. Chem. Phys. 1982, 78, 1661–1673.
  24. Janaswamy, S.; Chandrasekaran, R. Effect of calcium ions on the organization of iota-carrageenan helices: An X-ray investigation. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 523–535.
  25. Millane, R.P.; Chandrasekaran, R.; Arnott, S.; Dea, I.C.M. The molecular structure of kappa-carrageenan and comparison with iota-carrageenan. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 182, 1–17.
  26. Hirota, N.; Nagai, K. Helical structures and water vapor sorption properties of carrageenan membranes derived from red algae. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2022, 3, 100200.
  27. Le Questel, J.Y.; Cros, S.; Mackie, W.; Pérez, S. Computer modelling of sulfated carbohydrates: Applications to carrageenans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 161–175.
  28. Schefer, L.; Adamcik, J.; Mezzenga, R. Unravelling secondary structure changes on individual anionic polysaccharide chains by atomic force microscopy. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 5376–5379.
  29. Diener, M.; Adamcik, J.; Sánchez-Ferrer, A.; Jaedig, F.; Schefer, L.; Mezzenga, R. Primary, Secondary, Tertiary and Quaternary Structure Levels in Linear Polysaccharides: From Random Coil, to Single Helix to Supramolecular Assembly. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 1731–1739.
  30. Schefer, L.; Adamcik, J.; Diener, M.; Mezzenga, R. Supramolecular chiral self-assembly and supercoiling behavior of carrageenans at varying salt conditions. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 16182–16188.
  31. Makshakova, O.N.; Faizullin, D.A.; Zuev, Y.F. Interplay between secondary structure and ion binding upon thermoreversible gelation of κ-carrageenan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 227, 115342.
  32. Mikshina, P.V.; Makshakova, O.N.; Petrova, A.A.; Gaifullina, I.Z.; Idiyatullin, B.Z.; Gorshkova, T.A.; Zuev, Y.F. Gelation of rhamnogalacturonan I is based on galactan side chain interaction and does not involve chemical modifications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 171, 143–151.
  33. Makshakova, O.N.; Faizullin, D.A.; Mikshina, P.V.; Gorshkova, T.A.; Zuev, Y.F. Spatial structures of rhamnogalacturonan I in gel and colloidal solution identified by 1D and 2D-FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 231–239.
  34. Makshakova, O.N.; Gorshkova, T.A.; Mikshina, P.V.; Zuev, Y.F.; Perez, S. Metrics of rhamnogalacturonan I with β-(1→4)-linked galactan side chains and structural basis for its self-aggregation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 158, 93–101.
  35. Morris, E.R.; Rees, D.A.; Thom, D.; Boyd, J. Chiroptical and stoichiometric evidence of a specific, primary dimerisation process in alginate gelation. Carbohydr. Res. 1978, 66, 145–154.
  36. Braccini, I.; Grasso, R.P.; Pérez, S. Conformational and configurational features of acidic polysaccharides and their interactions with calcium ions: A molecular modeling investigation. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 317, 119–130.
  37. Braccini, I.; Pérez, S. Molecular Basis of Ca2+-Induced Gelation in Alginates and Pectins: The Egg-Box Model Revisited. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 1089–1096.
  38. Cao, L.; Lu, W.; Mata, A.; Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y. Egg-box model-based gelation of alginate and pectin: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 242, 116389.
  39. Kayitmazer, A.B.; Seyrek, E.; Dubin, P.L.; Staggemeier, B.A. Influence of Chain Stiffness on the Interaction of Polyelectrolytes with Oppositely Charged Micelles and Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 8158–8165.
  40. Perez, S.; Fadda, E.; Makshakova, O. 1.15—Computational Modeling in Glycoscience. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Barchi, J.J., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 374–404.
  41. Anggara, K.; Zhu, Y.; Delbianco, M.; Rauschenbach, S.; Abb, S.; Seeberger, P.H.; Kern, K. Exploring the Molecular Conformation Space by Soft Molecule–Surface Collision. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 21420–21427.
  42. Le, X.T.; Rioux, L.E.; Turgeon, S.L. Formation and functional properties of protein-polysaccharide electrostatic hydrogels in comparison to protein or polysaccharide hydrogels. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 239, 127–135.
  43. Stenner, R.; Matubayasi, N.; Shimizu, S. Gelation of carrageenan: Effects of sugars and polyols. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 54, 284–292.
  44. Tao, H.; Guo, L.; Qin, Z.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Shao, X.; Dou, G.; Cui, B. Textural characteristics of mixed gels improved by structural recombination and the formation of hydrogen bonds between curdlan and carrageenan. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 129, 107678.
  45. Antonov, Y.A.; Zhuravleva, I.L. The Interaction of Lysozyme with Carrageenans. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2019, 55, 209–217.
  46. Olsson, C.; Frigard, T.; Andersson, R.; Hermansson, A.M. Effects of amylopectin structure and molecular weight on microstructural and rheological properties of mixed beta-lactoglobulin gels. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 1400–1409.
  47. Derkach, S.R.; Kuchina, Y.A.; Kolotova, D.S.; Voron’ko, N.G. Polyelectrolyte Polysaccharide-Gelatin Complexes: Rheology and Structure. Polymers 2020, 12, 266.
  48. Turgeon, S.L.; Beaulieu, M. Improvement and modification of whey protein gel texture using polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll. 2001, 15, 583–591.
  49. Morris, V.J. Multicomponent gels. In Gums and Stabilisers for the Food Industry; Phillips, G., Wedlock, D., Williams, P., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 1986; p. 87.
  50. Tolstoguzov, V. Some physico-chemical aspects of protein processing in foods. Multicomponent gels. Food Hydrocoll. 1995, 9, 317–332.
  51. Donato, L.; Garnier, C.; Novales, B.; Durand, S.; Doublier, J.L. Heat-induced gelation of bovine serum albumin/low-methoxyl pectin systems and the effect of calcium ions. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 374–385.
  52. Tromp, R.H.; Rennie, A.R.; Jones, R.A.L. Kinetics of the Simultaneous Phase Separation and Gelation in Solutions of Dextran and Gelatin. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 4129–4138.
  53. Çakır, E.; Foegeding, E.A. Combining protein micro-phase separation and protein–polysaccharide segregative phase separation to produce gel structures. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 1538–1546.
  54. Burla, F.; Mulla, Y.; Vos, B.E.; Aufderhorst-Roberts, A.; Koenderink, G.H. From mechanical resilience to active material properties in biopolymer networks. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019, 1, 249–263.
  55. Turgeon, S.L.; Beaulieu, M. Effect of thermal treatments on large and small deformation properties of whey protein/pectin mixed gels. In Gums and Stabilisers for the Food Industry 12; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2004; pp. 211–226.
  56. Eleya, M.M.O.; Turgeon, S.L. The effects of pH on the rheology of beta-lactoglobulin/kappa-carrageenan mixed gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2000, 14, 245–251.
  57. Duran, N.M.; Spelzini, D.; Boeris, V. Characterization of acid—Induced gels of quinoa proteins and carrageenan. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 108, 39–47.
  58. Duran, N.M.; Galante, M.; Spelzini, D.; Boeris, V. The effect of carrageenan on the acid-induced aggregation and gelation conditions of quinoa proteins. Food Res. Int. 2018, 107, 683–690.
  59. Yan, J.N.; Du, Y.N.; Jiang, X.Y.; Han, J.R.; Pan, J.F.; Wu, H.T. Intermolecular interaction in the hybrid gel of scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) male gonad hydrolysates and kappa-carrageenan. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 792–802.
  60. Palanisamy, M.; Töpfl, S.; Aganovic, K.; Berger, R.G. Influence of iota carrageenan addition on the properties of soya protein meat analogues. LWT 2018, 87, 546–552.
  61. Biglarian, N.; Rafe, A.; Shahidi, S.A. Effect of basil seed gum and kappa-carrageenan on the rheological, textural, and structural properties of whipped cream. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5851–5860.
  62. Jiang, X.-Y.; Yan, J.-N.; Du, Y.-N.; Xu, S.-Q.; Han, J.-R.; Wu, H.-T. Hybrid gelation of scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) male gonad hydrolysates combined with different concentrations of iota-carrageenan. J. Food Measur. Charact. 2022, 16, 1974–1982.
  63. Lam, R.S.; Nickerson, M.T. Effect of the biopolymer mixing ratio on the formation of electrostatically coupled whey protein-κ- and ι-carrageenan networks in the presence and absence of oil droplets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8730–8739.
  64. Míšková, Z.; Salek, R.N.; Křenková, B.; Kůrová, V.; Němečková, I.; Pachlová, V.; Buňka, F. The effect of κ- and ι-carrageenan concentrations on the viscoelastic and sensory properties of cream desserts during storage. LWT 2021, 145, 111539.
  65. Bocker, L.; Ruhs, P.A.; Boni, L.; Fischer, P.; Kuster, S. Fiber-Enforced Hydrogels: Hagfish Slime Stabilized with Biopolymers including kappa-Carrageenan. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 90–95.
  66. Huang, M.; Mao, Y.Z.; Li, H.L.; Yang, H.S. Kappa-carrageenan enhances the gelation and structural changes of egg yolk via electrostatic interactions with yolk protein. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 129972.
  67. Raei, M.; Rafe, A.; Shahidi, F. Rheological and structural characteristics of whey protein-pectin complex coacervates. J. Food Eng. 2018, 228, 25–31.
  68. Makshakova, O.N.; Safarova, E.R.; Zuev, Y.F. Structural insights in interactions between RNase from Bacillus Intermedius and rhamnogalacturonan I from potato. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117038.
  69. Le, X.T.; Turgeon, S.L. Rheological and structural study of electrostatic cross-linked xanthan gum hydrogels induced by β-lactoglobulin. Soft Matter. 2013, 9, 3063–3073.
  70. Siddiqui, A.A.; Feroz, A.; Khaki, P.S.S.; Bano, B. Binding of lambda-carrageenan (a food additive) to almond cystatin: An insight involving spectroscopic and thermodynamic approach. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 684–690.
  71. Tang, H.G.; Tan, L.L.; Chen, Y.F.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.H.; Chen, L.H. Effect of kappa-carrageenan addition on protein structure and gel properties of salted duck egg white. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 1389–1395.
  72. Chen, J.X.; Deng, T.Y.; Wang, C.; Mi, H.B.; Yi, S.M.; Li, X.P.; Li, J.R. Effect of hydrocolloids on gel properties and protein secondary structure of silver carp surimi. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2252–2260.
  73. Zheng, H.N.; Beamer, S.K.; Matak, K.E.; Jaczynski, J. Effect of kappa-carrageenan on gelation and gel characteristics of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) protein isolated with isoelectric solubilization/precipitation. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 644–652.
  74. Burova, T.V.; Grinberg, N.V.; Grinberg, V.Y.; Usov, A.I.; Tolstoguzov, V.B.; de Kruif, C.G. Conformational Changes in ι- and κ-Carrageenans Induced by Complex Formation with Bovine β-Casein. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 368–375.
  75. Micsonai, A.; Wien, F.; Kernya, L.; Lee, Y.-H.; Goto, Y.; Réfrégiers, M.; Kardos, J. Accurate secondary structure prediction and fold recognition for circular dichroism spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E3095.
  76. Derkach, S.R.; Voron’ko, N.G.; Kuchina, Y.A.; Kolotova, D.S.; Gordeeva, A.M.; Faizullin, D.A.; Gusev, Y.A.; Zuev, Y.F.; Makshakova, O.N. Molecular structure and properties of κ-carrageenan-gelatin gels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 197, 66–74.
  77. Makshakova, O.N.; Bogdanova, L.R.; Faizullin, D.A.; Ermakova, E.A.; Zuev, Y.F.; Sedov, I.A. Interaction-induced structural transformation of lysozyme and kappa-carrageenan in binary complexes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 252, 117181.
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations