Natural Antiviral Polymers: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Natural polymers or biopolymers are classified into polysaccharides, polypeptides (proteins), and nucleic acid polymers (polynucleotides). Natural polymers as components of living systems are derived from plants, animals, and microorganisms.

  • natural polymers
  • biopolymers
  • polysaccharides

1. Introduction

Natural polymers or biopolymers are classified into polysaccharides, polypeptides (proteins), and nucleic acid polymers (polynucleotides) [28]. Natural polymers as components of living systems are derived from plants, animals, and microorganisms [28]. Advantages of natural polymers over synthetic polymers include biocompatibility, non-toxicity, biodegradability, and intrinsic antiviral properties as shown in Figure 2 [29]. Among different classes of biopolymers, polysaccharides and nucleic acid polymers are capable of interfering with the virus-host cell interaction to block fusion, entry, and replication of the virus in the host cell [30].
Figure 2. Key benefits of natural polymers as antiviral materials.

2. Polysaccharides

Polysaccharides are an abundant source of renewable and biodegradable polymers. Polysaccharides are made up of more than 10 monosaccharide repeat units connected by glycosilic linkages in branched or linear chains with molecular weights ranging from tens of thousands to a few millions [31]. Like other natural polymers, polysaccharides play vital functions in living systems from cell adhesion to intracellular signaling and maintenance of biological and mechanical properties of tissues [32]. Natural plant polysaccharides are composed of long sequences of monosaccharides with different biological activities including anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and antiviral activities [33,34]. Table 1 presents the general properties of carrageenan, chitin, chitosan, and fucoidan as widely studied polysaccharides with antiviral activities.
Table 1. Polysaccharides, their origin, and molecular characteristics.
Polysaccharide Origin Occurrence/Function Molecular Characteristics Ref.
Carrageenan Algae Structural polysaccharides of marine red algae Heteropolysaccharide, linear, anionic [35]
Chitin/chitosan Animal Chitin: structural polysaccharide from exoskeleton of insects and shells of crustaceans
Chitosan: derivative of chitin prepared by deacetylation
Chitin: homopolysaccharide, linear, neutral
Chitosan: heteropolysaccharide, linear, cationic
Fucoidan Algae Structure and composition dependent on species with diverse structures Heteropolysaccharide, anionic, linear. [37]
Polysaccharides possess different types of functional groups including hydroxyl, amine, and carboxylic acid groups which can be used for polymer modification [33,34]. These functional groups are used to tailor the properties of polysaccharides to specific biological applications [38,39]. The inhibitory effect of negatively charged polysaccharides on viral infections is well documented [40,41,42]. Polysaccharides interact with Trans-Activator of Transcription (Tat) regulatory protein of viruses to inhibit their interaction with cell surface receptors like heparan sulfates [43]. As an example, carrageenan which is a naturally sulfated polysaccharide of red algae, inhibits many viral infections including human papillomavirus (HPV), herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1), and influenza A virus (IAV) by interacting with the viral Tat protein [44,45]. Numerous studies have reported the inhibitory effect of plant polysaccharides on replication of human and animal viruses including SARS associated coronaviruses (SARS-CoV) [46,47,48,49]. These include brown algae, Auricularia auricula, Pinus massoniana, and Acanthopanax polysaccharides [50]. . According to these results, highly sulfated long-chain glycomimetic polymers prevented human papillomavirus (HPV16) infection in vitro and in vivo by interaction with the virus prior to cell attachment whereas highly sulfated short-chain glycomimetic oligomers inhibited viral infection post cell attachment [23]. The polyanionic nature of sulfated polysaccharides facilitates interaction with the positively charged domains of the virus envelope glycoproteins to form a non-reversible complex, thus making the viral glycoprotein sites inaccessible to interact with surface receptors of the host cell [51]. This non-reversible polysaccharide-viral interaction blocks binding and fusion of the virus with the host cell which inhibits viral entry in the cell [51]. Seaweed polysaccharides with high anionic sulfate content are attractive as antiviral agents to inhibit infections [52,53,54]. The structural diversity and complexity of marine polysaccharides and their derivatives contribute to their antiviral activity at different stages of viral infections [55]. The antiviral activity of polysaccharides is affected by their molecular weight. As the antiviral activity arises from the interaction of polysaccharides with viral envelope proteins through reversible secondary interactions like electrostatic, nonpolar, and hydrogen bonding, long chains that can form irreversible complexes substantially increase antiviral activity.

2.1. Carrageenan

The cell wall of marine red seaweed contains the polysaccharides agaran and carrageenan that form approximately 50% of the dry mass of seaweed. As a high molecular weight sulfated polysaccharide, carrageenan has long been used as a gelling agent and stabilizer in food [59]. However, carrageenan has many biological activities including anticoagulation, antioxidation, antiviral, and immunostimulatory [60]. Based on sulfate content, there are more than 10 types of carrageenan, but only the types lambda (λ), kappa (κ), and iota (ι) are of particular interest in viral and medical applications [61]. The chemical structure of the three carrageenan types is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Chemical structure of lambda (λ), kappa (κ), and iota (ι) carrageenan.
The negatively-charged sulfate groups of carrageenan neutralize the positive charge of the cell surface, leading to inhibition of viral attachment, penetration, and viral uncoating [62]. The biological activity of carrageenan strongly depends on its degree of sulfation, which depends on carrageenan (λ, κ and ι) as well as virus type [63]. List of studies on antiviral activity of λ, κ, and ι carrageenan are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Antiviral activity of λ, κ, and ι carrageenan against different viruses.
Type Virus Genome Cell Line IC50/EC50 (µg/mL) Ref.
κ DENV-1 RNA Vero >50 (EC50) [64]
κ DENV-2 RNA Vero 1.8 (EC50) [64]
κ HSV-1 DNA Vero 1.9 (EC50) [65]
κ HSV-2 DNA Vero 1.6 (EC50) [65]
κ HIV-1 RNA MT-4 12 (IC50) [66]
ι DENV-1 RNA Vero 41 (EC50) [64]
ι DENV-2 RNA Vero 0.40 (EC50) [64]
ι H1N1 RNA MDCK 0.39 (IC50) [67]
ι SARS-CoV-2 RNA Vero 0.05 (IC50) [68]
λ HIV-1 RNA MT-4 1.9 (IC50) [66]
λ H1N1 RNA MDCK 0.04 (IC50) [44]
λ VSV RNA HeLa 4.0 (IC50) [66]
In general, a higher degree of sulfation leads to a higher antiviral activity [55]. It is reported that λ-carrageenan having 35% sulfation exhibits approximately ten times higher inhibition against HIV infection as compared to κ-carrageenan with 25% sulfation [69]. Aside from sulfation, the source of polysaccharide affects its antiviral activity [70]. Carrageenan is capable of affecting virus replication directly through the sulfate groups leading to a decrease in viral activity [71]. For example, carrageenan binding changes the structure of HSV virus, namely the structure of glycoproteins B and C, which results in virus deactivation. Vissani et al. demonstrated that the antiviral activity of ι-carrageenan against herpesvirus-3 is linked to envelope glycoprotein binding [72]. Functional characterization showed that ι-carrageenan and N-sulfonated derivatives of poly (allylamine hydrochloride) blocked the release of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) from infected cells, which reduced viral spreading [73]. A nasal spray for the delivery of carrageenan has been developed for treating patients infected with rhinovirus (HRV), coronavirus (HCoV), and influenza A (IAV) virus. The nasal spray decreased viral symptoms in infected patients and it was most effective against the human coronavirus [74]. It should be pointed out that ι-carrageenan is an approved antiviral drug for use against not only HRV, IAV-H1N1 and HCoV-OC43 but also against viral throat infection [75].
Carrageenan has also been used against human papillomavirus (HPV) which is a non-enveloped small DNA virus capable of infecting mucosal membrane or skin [76]. In one study, carrageenan showed antiviral activity against HPV pseudovirus in a luciferase mouse model without exhibiting a cytotoxic effect [77]. In another study, the antiviral activity of carrageenan was compared with heparin sulfate and highly sulfated synthetic glycomimetic polymers in vitro and in vivo [23]. Both short chain oligomeric sulfated saccharides with 2–10 sugar units and long polymeric saccharides with 40–80 sugar units were synthesized to mimic different properties of glycopolymers, as shown in Figure 4A,B. The in vitro evaluation of the antiviral agents were done with HPV16-eGFP pseudovirus incubated with HeLa cervical cancer cells whereas the in vivo evaluations were done with HPV16-luciferase inoculated in the mouse vagina [23]. The addition of carrageenan, heparin sulfate, and polymeric sulfated saccharides inhibited the attachment of HPV16 pseudovirus to the surface of HeLa cells to block viral infection (Figure 4C) [23]. The effectiveness of polymeric sulfated saccharides with 40 units in inhibiting viral attachment was slightly less than that with 80 units. The in vivo imaging results showed that both carrageenan and heparin sulfate were effective in inhibiting HPV16 infection after 2 days of inoculation [23].
Figure 4. Schematic representation of short ((A), 10 sugar units) and long ((B), n units) chain oligomeric sulfated saccharides to mimic different properties of glycopolymers; (C) the sulfated glycopolymers block viral infection by interfering with virus attachment to the cell surface. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [23]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.

2.2. Chitosan and Its Derivatives

Chitin and chitosan due to their biocompatibility, degradability, and non-immunogenicity are used in the development of antimicrobial wound dressing as well as other medical applications [80,81]. Chitin, comprised of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-glucosamine units, is isolated from the shell of arthropods like shrimp, lobster, crab, and insects or produced by fermentation [82]. Chitosan is produced from chitin by partial deacetylation or by enzymatic hydrolysis [83]. Although the antimicrobial properties of chitosan is well-documented, less is known about the antiviral activity of this biopolymer [84]. The degree of acetylation and amination, chitosan concentration, molecular weight, overall charge as well as charge distribution, and functional group modification affects antiviral activity of chitosan [85,86]. The positively charged derivatives of chitosan possess antiviral activity whereas the negatively charged derivatives are not antiviral [81]. Chitosan can inhibit viral infection directly and indirectly or it can be used as a carrier in the delivery of antiviral agents, as shown in Figure 5 [87].
Figure 5. The direct (A) and indirect (B) approaches to using chitosan to inhibit viral infection; (C) chitosan is also used as a carrier for delivery of antiviral agents. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [83]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
A sulfated derivative of chitin, namely N-carboxymethyl chitosan-N-O-sulfate (NCMCS), was shown to inhibit uptake and replication of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) in CD4+ human T-lymphoma cells, which was attributed to the interference of NCMCS with the interaction of viral GP120 envelope glycoproteins with CD4+ cell surface receptors [90]. In another study, a sulfated derivative of carboxymethyl chitin (SCM-chitin) was shown to inhibit penetration and subsequent pathogenesis of herpes simplex type-1 virus (HSV-1) in vitro in monkey kidney epithelial cells (Vero) as compared to carboxymethyl chitin which showed no activity [91]. The sulfated derivative of chitosan was also found to protect Vero cells from cytopathic infection by Coxsackie and Rift Valley fever RNA viruses [92]. Chitosan and its derivatives are used as a carrier in delivery of antiviral drugs to reduce the minimum required dose and increase bioavailability, thus improving the drugs’ therapeutic effectiveness (Figure 5C) [93]. In one study, curcumin encapsulated in chitosan nanoparticles (NPs) was shown to have higher antiviral activity against hepatitis C virus genotype 4a (HCV-4a) in human hepatoma cells as compared to unencapsulated curcumin [94]. A delivery system based on zinc-stabilized nanocomplex of chitosan and chondroitin sulfate for delivery of tenofovir was developed for inhibition of HIV-1 viral infection, as shown in Figure 6 [95]. The tenofovir-loaded nanocomplex showed strong antiviral activity against HIV-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) without a cytotoxic effect. The delivery system showed considerable antiviral activity in the absence of tenofovir [95].
Figure 6. A nanocomplex for delivery of tenofovir based on zinc-stabilized chitosan and chondroitin sulfate. Abbreviations are TF for tenofovir, CS for chitosan, Chons for chondroitin sulfate, IgA for antibody, PECs for polyelectrolyte complexes, and PBMCs for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [95]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Recently, the antiviral activity of quaternary ammonium modified chitosan such as N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-3-trimethylammonium chitosan (HTCC) and N-palmitoyl-N-monomethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N,N,N-trimethyl-6-O-glycolchitosan (GCPQ) is reported against SARS-CoV-2, as shown in Figure 7 [96,97]. Due to the quaternary ammonium functional groups in the structure of HTCC and GCPQ, these positively charged molecules bind electrostatically to coronavirus S proteins to block not only viral entry to host cells but also to prevent viral replication. List of studies on antiviral activity of chitosan and its derivatives are presented in Table 3.
Figure 7. Chemical structures of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-3-trimethylammonium chitosan (HTCC) and N-palmitoyl-N-monomethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N,N,N-trimethyl-6-O-glycolchitosan (GCPQ) with quaternary ammonium functional groups.
Table 3. Antiviral activity of chitosan and its derivatives.
Chitosan Virus Cell Line Concentration Ref.
Zinc stabilized chitosan HIV-1 Human peripheral blood mononuclear 0.1–0.2% w/v chitosan in acetic acid [95]
Curcumin-loaded chitosan nanocomposite Hepatitis C human hepatoma 20 µg/mL curcumin in 4% chitosan composite [94]
Chitosan with medium molecular weight AD169 strain of HCMV Human embryonic lung fibroblasts 9–14 mg
Fostcanet antiviral drug in 4.5 mg chitosan
Silver-loaded chitosan H1N1 Influenza A Madin-Darby canine kidney Ag NPs in 10 mg/mL chitosan [99]
Nanosilver-loaded polyquaternary phosphonium oligochitosan Hepatitis A Vero 100 µL/mL silver NPs [100]
3,6-O-sulfated chitosan HPV 293FT, Hela, HaCaT 2.4, 4.7, 4.2 µg/mL chitosan [101]
HTCC SARS-CoV2 human airway epithelium (HAE) 12.5 µg/mL HTCC [96]
GCPQ SARS-CoV2 Vero E6 and A549 10 µg/mL GCPQ [97]

2.3. Fucoidan

Fucoidan is a sulfated, acidic polysaccharide composed of L-fucose and galactose monosaccharides with smaller proportions of xylose and mannose [102]. It is isolated from the cell wall of marine brown seaweeds like Ascopbyllum nodosum, Fucus vesiculosus, Saccharina japonica, and Sargassum thunbergia. Based on molecular structure, there are two types of fucoidan, as shown in Figure 8, namely type I having (1→3)-l-fucopyranose repeats and type II having (1→3)- and (1→4)-l-fucopyranose repeat units [103]. Depending on degree and pattern of sulfation, molecular weight and composition, fucoidans possess different biological properties including antiviral [56,57,104,105,106,107], anti-inflammatory [108], immunologic [109] and antitumor [110,111] properties.
Figure 8. Molecular structure of type I and type II fucoidans from brown seaweed; the R groups represent sulfate, glucuronic acid, or fucopyranose groups.
The mechanism of action for antiviral activity of fucoidans from different sources has been recently studied [56,112]. Fucoidan inactivates the virus before or after cell internalization [113]. After internalization, fucoidan prevents viral transcription as well as other intracellular targets, thus blocking viral replication [113]. List of studies on antiviral activity of fucoidans from different sources are presented in Table 4. The LMW fucoidans showed antiviral activity in HeLa, Hep-2, and MDCK cells infected with influenza A virus at medium and high fucoidan doses in the range of 0.15–2.4 mg/mL whereas low doses were ineffective against influenza A [57]. Further, the survival time of the virus-infected mice increased and their lung index improved with intravenous administration of fucoidan [57]. In this study, fucoidan acted as an adjuvant to suppress HBV DNA, HBV surface antigen (HBsAG) and active HBV proteins implicated in viral replication, namely HBeAg and HBcAg [114].
Table 4. Antiviral activity of fucoidans from different species of seaweed.
Fucoidan Virus Cell Line IC50 (μg/mL) Ref.
Cladosiphon okamuranus Newcastle Disease (NDV) Vero 0.75 [115]
Scytosiphon lomentaria HSV-1, HSV-2 Vero 1.12–1.22 [112]
Sargassum henslowianum HSV-1, HSV-2 Vero 0.48–0.89 [113]
Sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida (Mekabu) Influenza A MDCK 15 [116]
Brown Algae: Fucus evanescens HSV-1, HSV-2, HIV-1 MT-4 25–80 [117]

3. Nucleic Acid Polymers

Nucleic acid polymers (NAPs), as phosphorothioate oligonucleotides, possess an-tiviral activity [118]. Oligonucleotides and NAPs can be stabilized against degradation by nucleases made amphipathic by phosphorothioation of non-bridging oxygen atoms through phosphodiester linkages [118]. The antiviral activity of phosphorothioated NAPs was first reported in a study on mechanism of action and the effect of NAPs’ structure on inhibition of HIV-1 infection [114]. It was found that NAPs inhibited viral entry to the host cell and the extent of inhibition was controlled by the size of NAPs, not their sequence distribution. According to this study, NAPs with >20 nucleotides showed antiviral activity [114]. The antiviral activity of NAPs against HIV-1 was at-tributed to the interaction of NAPs with the amphipathic alpha helix triplets found in the core of metastable envelope glycoprotein gp41 of HIV to inhibit viral entry to the host cell. The first step in the viral inhibition is decomplexation of the amphipathic al-pha helices of gp41 by NAPs followed by interaction with hydrophobic moieties of the alpha helices, which explains the dependence of NAP inhibition on size and phos-phorothioation [119]. The interaction of NAPs with amphipathic alpha helix triplets of gp41 was used for targeting and inactivating other viruses including cytomegalovirus, herpesvirus, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [120,121,122,123]. A similar mechanism is proposed for the role of NAPs in blocking the entry of hepatitis C virus (HCV) into host cells [122]. However, one study reported that NAPs did not prevent HCV attach-ment to the host cells but blocked the post-binding step required for viral entry [123]. The post-binding step is posited to involve the interaction of NAPs with other viral proteins including the hypervariable region of glycoprotein E2 or apolipoprotein E [124,125]. The antiviral activity of NAPs assessed against ductal hepatitis B virus (DHBV) with primary duck hepatocytes (PDH) as the host was shown to be dependent on NAP size and amphipathicity [126]. Specifically, NAPs with >40 nucleotides showed higher antiviral activity against DHBV. The therapeutic potential of two NAPs, namely REP 2055 and REP 2139-Ca, were evaluated in patients with HBeAg positive chronic HBV infection in two clinical studies [127,128]. The patients treated with NAP monotherapy showed 2–7 log reduction in serum HBsAg, 3–9 log reduction in serum HBV DNA, and the presence of serum anti-HBsAg antibodies in the patients’ blood [127,128]. These results indicated that NAPs could potentially be used as a component in combination therapies in treating patients with HBV. In another study, the safety and therapeutic efficacy of REP 2139 and REP 2165 NAPs combined with commonly used medication to treat patients with chronic hepatitis B, namely tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and pegylated interferon α-2a (PegIFN), were assessed in a randomized phase 2 clinical trial. The REP 2139 NAP and its bioequivalent REP 2165 block the assembly of subviral particles (SVPs) in hepatocytes resulting in clearance of HBsAg surface antigens. The experimental NAP groups were TDF+PegIFN+REP 2139 and TDF+PegIFN+REP 2165 [129]. According to the results, there was no difference in the levels of HBsAg, indicative of HBV infection, anti-HBs, indicative of recovery from HBV infection, and HBV DNA between the two NAP groups [129]. The undesired side effects induced by PegIFN, namely thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, were unaf-fected by the addition of NAPs to TD and PegIFN. However, the levels of HBV-induced transaminases were initially higher in the NAP groups, but the levels returned to nor-mal during therapy and follow-up [129]. Treatment with TDF+PegIFN without NAP resulted in low HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion as well as low functional cure. Conversely, treatment with TDF+PegIFN+NAP resulted in high HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion as well as high functional cure with normal liver function [129]. No differences in HBsAg loss, seroconversion, or functional cure were observed between the two NAP groups. An in vitro model based on HepG2.2.15 hepatocyte cells that constitutively express HBV demonstrated that the NAPs’ endosomal release selectively impaired the secretion of HBsAg without accumulation of HBsAg in the cells [130]. NAPs due to their biocompatibility, degradability, and their ability to penetrate cell membranes have been used as a carrier for delivery of antiviral drugs against classical swine fever virus (CSFV) in infected pigs [131,132]. The enveloped virus with a sin-gle-stranded RNA causing CSFV belongs to the genus Pestivirus in the family Fla-viviridae [133]. The small interfering RNA (siRNA) was delivered to the host cells in a porcine CSFV model using tetrahedral framework nucleic acid (tFNA), as a three-dimensional DNA nanomaterial that self-assembles by complementary base pairing [134]. Concurrent delivery of C3 and C6 siRNAs in self-assembled tFNA to host cells prevented viral replication and exocytosis, as shown in Figure 9 [134].
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of siRNA delivery by tFNA nanomaterial. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [134]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Following penetration through the cell membrane, CSFV is transported to the endoplasmic reticulum where its single-stranded RNA is released for protein translation. Following RNA translation, CSFV is replicated on the cytoplasmic membrane leading to the formation of viral particles in the Golgi apparatus. The siRNAs carried by tFNA degrade the released viral RNA to prevent its translation in the endoplasmic reticulum. List of studies on antiviral activity of NAPs are presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Antiviral activity of NAPs against different viruses with their mechanism of actions.
NAP Virus Cell Line Mechanism of Action Ref.
Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides HIV-1 H9 Inhibiting viral entry to the host [119]
amphipathic DNA polymer (40-nucleotide polycytidine) HSV Human cervical epithelial (CaSki) Reduced viral and protein expression [120]
Amphipathic DNA polymers (REP 9, REP 2015 and REP 9C) Animal NIH 3T3 Reduced viral replication [123]
REP 2006 HBV DHBV Reduced viral entry to the host [126]
REP 2055 HBV DHBV blocking release of DHBsAg from the infected hepatocytes [128]

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/polym14091634

This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service