Reviewing Arch-Dams’ Building Risk Reduction: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The are thousands of large dams over the globe. The importance of dams is rapidly increasing due to the impact of climate change on increasing hydrological process variability and on water planning and management need. This study tackles a review for the concrete arch-dams’ design process, from a dual sustainability/safety management approach. On one hand, Sustainability is evaluated through a design optimization for dams´ stability and deformation analysis. On the other hand, safety is directly related to the reduction and consequences of failure risk. For that, several scenarios about stability and deformation, identifying desirable and undesirable actions, were estimated. More than 100 specific parameters regarding dam-reservoir-foundation-sediments system and their interactions have been collected. Also, a summary of mathematical modelling was made, and more than 100 references were summarized. The following consecutive steps, required to design engineering (why act), maintenance (when to act) and operations activities (how to act), were evaluated: individuation of hazards, definition of failure potential and estimation of consequences (harm to people, assets and environment). Results show that the area to model the dam–foundation interaction is around 3.0 Hd2, the system-damping ratio and vibration period is 8.5% and 0.39 s. Also, maximum elastic and elasto-plastic displacements are ~0.10–0.20 m. The failure probability for stability is 34%, whereas for deformation it is 29%

  • concrete arch-dams
  • stability scenarios
  • deformation scenarios
  • safety management
  • sustainability assessment

0. Basic Information for Authors:

Please fill out the required information completely and carefully as your entry will be published directly after submission without peer review. Details can be found on the guideline page (

1. Encyclopedia is completely free for contributors and readers.

2. Entries can have more than one author while still in the draft phase. The creator can share editing rights with others after saving the content of their entry.

3. For some well-prepared entries, authors can apply for a DOI for the latest version and a discount voucher will be granted for paper publication in MDPI.

1. Definition

Please provide an accurate concept or description at the top and briefly highlight the importance or benefits for humans.

2. Introduction or History

This part should account the development history in detail, including the origin, key breakthroughs, current status, etc.

3. Data, Model, Applications and Influences

Details about which area the research applies to or what kind of problems it can solve. Your insights, or hypotheses if necessary, regarding the research are also welcomed.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su12010392


  1. Inventory of Dams and Reservoirs (SNCZI). . SNCZI. Retrieved 2020-1-13
  2. Spanish Association of Dams and Reservoirs (SEPREM) . SEPREM. Retrieved 2020-1-13
  3. Huang, H.; Chen, B.; Liu, C.; Safety monitoring of a super-high dam using optimal kernel partial least squares. Math. Probl. Eng 2015, 2015, 571594, .
  4. Shi, Z.; Gu, C.; Qin, D; Variable-intercept panel model for deformation zoning of a super-high arch dam. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 898–917, .
  5. Zhang, Q.L.; Wang, F.; Gan, X.Q.; Li, B; A field investigation into penetration cracks close to dam-to-pier interfaces and numerical analysis. Eng. Fail. Anal 2015, 57, 188–201, .
  6. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Saouma, V.E.; Seismic fragility analysis of concrete dams: A state-of-the-art review.. Eng. Struct 2016, 128, 374–399, .
  7. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Risk, reliability, resilience (R3) and beyond in dam engineering: A state-of-the-art review.. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct 2018, 31, 806–831, .
  8. Altarejos-García, L.; Escuder-Bueno, I.; Serrano-Lombillo, A.; De Membrillera-Ortuño, M.G; Methodology for estimating the probability of failure by sliding in concrete gravity dams in the context of risk analysis. Struct. Saf. 2012, 36–37, 1–13, .
  9. Savage, J.L.; Houk, I.E.; Checking arch dam design with models. Civ. Eng 1931, 1, 695–699, .
  10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Arch Dam Design, Manual; USACE, Eds.; USACE: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 1110-2-2201.
  11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).. Theoretical Manual for Analysis of Arch Dams; Technical Report; USACE, Eds.; USACE: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. ITL-93-1.
  12. International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD).. Selecting Seismic Parameters for Large Dams; Guidelines, Bulletin; ICOLD:, Eds.; ICOLD:: Paris, 2016; pp. 148.
  13. Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (FEMA).. Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams; FEMA, Eds.; FEMA: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. NC.
  14. International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD).. Dam Safety Management: Operational Phases of the Dam Life Cycle; ICOLD, Eds.; ICOLD: Paris, 2017; pp. NC.
  15. Pouraminian, M.; Ghaemian, M; Multi-criteria optimization of concrete arch dams. Sci. Iran 2017, 24, 1810–1820, .
  16. Kaveh, A.; Gha arian, R.; Shape optimization of arch dams with frequency constraints by enhanced charged system search algorithm and neural network.. Int. J. Civ. Eng 2015, 13, 102–111, .
  17. Seyedpoor, S.M.; Gholizadeh, S.; Optimum shape design of arch dams by a combination of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation and genetic algorithm methods. Adv. Struct. Eng 2008, 11, 500–510, .
  18. Seyedpoor, S.M.; Salajegheh, J.; Salajegheh, E.; Gholizadeh, S; Optimal design of arch dams subjected to earthquake loading by a combination of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation and particle swarm algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput 2011, 11, 39–48, .
  19. Mahani, A.S.; Shojaee, S.; Salajegheh, E.; Khatibinia, M.; Hybridizing two-stage meta-heuristic optimization model with weighted least squares support vector machine for optimal shape of double arch dams. Appl. Soft Comput 2015, 27, 205–218, .
  20. Zhang, X.F.; Li, S.Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Optimization of geometric shape if Xiamen arch dam. Adv. Eng. Softw 2009, 40, 105–109, .
  21. Akbari, J.; Ahmadi, M.T.; Moharrami, H.; Advances in concrete arch dams shape optimization. Appl. Math. Model 2011, 35, 3316–3333, .
  22. Shouyi, L.; Lujun, D.; Lijuan, Z.; Wei, Z.; Optimization design of arch dam shape with modified complex method.. Adv. Eng. Softw 2009, 40, 804–808, .
  23. Gholizadeh, S.; Seyedpoor, S.M.; Shape optimization of arch dams by metaheuristics and neural networks for frequency constraints.. Sci. Iran 2011, 18, 1020–1027, .
  24. Mirzabozorg, H.; Varmazyari, M.; Ghaemian, M; Dam-reservoir-massed foundation system and travelling wave along reservoir bottom.. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng 2010, 30, 746–756, .
  25. Lamea, M.; Mirzabozorg, H; Simulating structural responses of a generic AAR-a ected arch dam considering seismic loading. Sci. Iran 2018, 25, 2926–2937, .
  26. Wang, J.T.; Jin, A.Y.; Du, X.L.; Wu, M.X.; Scatter of dynamic response and damage of an arch dam subjected to artificial earthquake accelerograms.. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng 2016, 87, 93–100, .
  27. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Furgani, L.; Meghella, M.; Saouma,V.E.; Anew class of seismic damage and performance indices for arch dams via ETA method. Eng. Struct 2016, 110, 145–160, .
  28. García, F.; Aznárez, J.J.; Padrón, L.A.; Maeso, O.; Relevance of the incidence angle of the seismic waves on the dynamic response of arch dams.. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2016, 90, 442–453, .
  29. Furgani, L.; Imperatore, S.; Nuti, C; Analisi sismica delle dighe a gravità: Dal semplice al complesso, se necessaio.. Proceedings of the XIV Convegno ANIDIS, L’Ingeneria Sismica 2011., Bari, Italy, 18–22 September, NC, .
  30. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Kianoush, M.R; Integrative seismic safety evaluation of a high concrete arch dam. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2014, 67, 85–101, .
  31. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Mirzabozorg, H.; Kianoush, R; Comparative study of endurance time and time history methods in seismic analysis of high arch dams.. Int. J. Civ. Eng 2014, 12, 219–236, .
  32. Chen, B.F.; Yuan, Y.S; Nonlinear hydrodynamic pressures on rigid arch dams during earthquakes. Proceedings of the 12 WCEE 2000, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2000., New Zeland, 30 January–4 February, NC, .
  33. Schultz, M.; Huynh, P.; Cvijanovic, V.; Implementing nonlinear analysis of concrete dams and soil-structure interaction under extreme seismic loading. Proceedings of the 34th AnnualUSSDConference 2014., San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 April, NC, .
  34. Khosravi, S.; Heydari, M.M.; Modelling of concrete gravity dam including dam-water-foundation rock interaction. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013, 22, 538–546, .
  35. Alegre, A.; Oliveira, S.; Ramos, R.; Espada, M.; Resposta sísmica de barragens abobada. Estudo numérico sobre a influência da cota de água na albufeira.. Proceedings of the Encontro Nacional Betão Estrutural 2018, BE2018, NC, .
  36. Seyedpoor, S.M.; Salajegheh, J.; Salajegheh, E; Shape optimal design of arch dams including dam-water-foundation rock interaction using a grading strategy and approximation concepts. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 1149–1163, .
  37. Mirzabozorg, H.; Kordzadeh, A.; Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Seismic response of concrete arch dams including dam-reservoir-foundation interaction using infinite elements. Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 2012, 12, 63–73, .
  38. Proulx, J.; Paultre, P.; Experimental and numerical investigation of dam-reservoir-foundation interaction for a large gravity dam. Can. J. Civ. Eng 1997, 25, 90–105, .
  39. Akköse, M.; Adanur, S.; Bayraktar, A.; Dumano˘ glu, A.A.; Elasto-plastic earthquake response of arch dams including fluid-structure interaction by the Lagrangian approach. Appl. Math. Model 2008, 32, 2396–2412, .
  40. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Seyed-Kolbadi, S.M.; Seismic cracking and instability of concrete dams: Smeared crack approach. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2015, 52, 45–60, .
  41. Demirel, E.; Numerical simulation of earthquake excited dam-reservoirs with irregular geometries using an immersed boundary method. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015, 73, 80–90, .
  42. Li, Q.; Guan, J.; Wu, Z.; Dong,W.; Zhou, S.; Equivalent maturity for ambient temperature e ect on fracture parameters of site-casting dam concrete.. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 293–308, .
  43. Shi, N.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z; Crack risk evaluation of early age concrete based on the distributed optical fiber temperature sensing. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 4082926, .
  44. Jin, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Practical procedure for predicting non-uniform temperature on the exposed face of arch dams.. Appl. Therm. Eng 2010, 30, 2146–2156, .
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!