3. The Role of NAC in Cystic Fibrosis
Oxidative stress is now recognized as one of the predisposing factors in the development of diseases such as CF. An adequate level of GSH is essential to combat excessive ROS production. Inflammation and infection are hallmarks of CF lungs and are closely linked to CFTR dysfunction. In addition, many pathogenic bacteria have evolved not only to survive, but also to thrive in an environment characterized by the oxidative stress caused by infection
[8].
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is an important pro-inflammatory glycolipid component that characterizes the outer membrane of gram-negatives, such as
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The presence of LPS induces an increase of neutrophils, macrophages, and cytokines in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and induces an increase of ROS
[9]. NAC can act in this type of environment both as an antioxidant and as an anti-inflammatory in a concentration-dependent manner
[10]. In fact, the presence of LPS leads to the release of neurokine A (NKA)
[9], which plays an important role in triggering inflammation. In this regard, Calzetta et al. demonstrated that NAC has an anti-inflammatory effect at both high and low concentrations, and that it has the power to act against LPS by modulating both NKA and IL-6 levels
[11].
Moreover, CF airway inflammation is due to an excessive neutrophil recruitment, triggered by extrinsic and intrinsic factors, and by an imbalance between reduced concentrations of anti-inflammatory molecules (IL-10, lipoxins, chemotaxis inhibitors, and neutrophil activators) and higher levels of pro-inflammatory proteins (calprotectin). Malabsorption of dietary antioxidants in the gut and the inability of cells with the CFTR mutation to efflux glutathione (GSH) play an important role in the systemic redox imbalance already exacerbated by the excessive release of oxidants by neutrophils. This inflammation is a self-amplifying process, with neutrophil-derived effectors promoting the exit of neutrophils from the bone marrow into the circulation and subsequently into the CF airways.
Thus, it can be established that neutrophils are the cellular link between redox imbalance and inflammatory imbalance
[12].
N-acetylcysteine, as a GSH prodrug, could improve this imbalance by increasing GSH in blood neutrophils and decreasing neutrophils and elastase activity in CF airways. Since NAC has demonstrated long-term safety at high doses, its use in combination with other drugs (antibiotics/anti-inflammatories) could be a plausible solution to fight and prevent inflammation
[13].
Mutated CFTR may be associated with an alteration of certain signal transduction pathways at the cellular level, such as that of NFkB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain- enhancer of activated B cells). In the lung, NFkB is required for the transcription of several pro-inflammatory molecules, and it is overexpressed in CF. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are activators of NFkB and the same stimulation of bacteria on the cell surface induces its activation
[14]. The CFTR mutation is also associated with reduced production of PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor), a transcription factor, which has an opposite action to NFkB and therefore a contrasting activity
[12]. An influence of NAC on NFkB activation was observed, up to a concentration of 45 mM
[14], which is a high concentration. However, NAC appears to have a cell type-specific action: in human bronchial epithelial cells, NAC inhibited silica-induced NFkB at a concentration of 5 mM
[15].
These results show great promise because they demonstrate NAC activity at low concentrations.
Other research has suggested other mechanisms of action that may involve the effects of NAC on CFTR. Luciani et al. demonstrated an autophagic pathway for intracellular trafficking, dependent on CFTR function, which is restored by NAC treatment allowing normal CFTR maturation and trafficking to the cell surface
[16]. Furthermore, Chen et al. found that NAC treatment ameliorated the overproduction of oxidants and subsequent cytokine overexpression, as they observed a decrease in Nrf-2 (nuclear regulatory factor)-dependent antioxidant responses in CF epithelia, resulting in an increase in hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2), thus contributing to the overproduction of the inflammatory pro-cytokines IL- 6 and IL-8
[17]. In addition, hypochlorous acid and its derivatives (HOX: hypobromous acid, HOBr, hypo-thiocyanous acid, HOSCN) can play an important role in the pathophysiology of CF
[18]. HOX is produced by activated neutrophils and monocytes through the activation of myeloperoxidase (MPO), which catalyzes the reaction between hydrogen peroxide and halides. These oxidants are bactericidal and disinfectant, aiding the human response against pathogens, and can also react with important biological molecules, inducing cytotoxic effects. High levels of MPO protein, increased halogenated proteins, and disulfide bonds are reported in the airway mucus of CF patients, suggesting that oxidation occurring from airway inflammation contributes to the formation of viscous, pathological mucus in the affected lungs. Thus, high concentrations of NAC in this condition, which sees a depletion of the -SH pool, may neutralize HOX species
[19][20].
To date, gram-negative bacilli (GNB) play a major role in CF, and over the years these GNBs have shown increasing resistance to antibiotics, limiting the treatment of this disease.
To cope with this resistance, physicians in clinical practice use different associations of aminoglycoside (tobramycin), polymyxin (colistin), and fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin)
[21][22] to treat
P. aeruginosa, or other less common gram-negative pathogens. Antibiotic efficacy, however, can be improved when used in combination with a non-antibiotic compound, such as NAC.
Synergy between compounds is defined as “when the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the individual compound is decreased significantly after the compounds are combined”
[22].
From the literature, it is possible to notice the interaction between ciprofloxacin and NAC and their synergistic action (50%) in the biofilm detachment, as demonstrated by Zaho et al.
[23], meaning that NAC and ciprofloxacin could be used together to treat
P. aeruginosa biofilm. In this work, it is also clear that
P. aeruginosa is more susceptible to NAC than are other strains and that there is another interesting synergistic effect with carbenicillin and tobramycin. In fact, carbenicillin MIC decreases from 16 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL in the presence of NAC.
Lea et al.
[24] demonstrated that the resistance of the bacterium to ciprofloxacin fails with a combination of NAC and antibiotics. In a recent work, a significant decrease in planktonic and attached bacterial growth was observed using combinations of ciprofloxacin/colistin and NACH
2. Significant reductions in CFU/mL in mature biofilms were also observed
[25]. In addition, NAC has also been shown to antagonize colistin resistance mechanisms, especially against strains such as
S. malthopila [26].
The effect of NAC with other anti-inflammatories was then studied, evidencing that the combination of NAC/diclofenac, NAC/ibuprofen, and NAC/ketoprofen increases biofilm detachment activity compared to single active ingredients alone
[27]. These works, despite being in vitro, give great hope for using this molecule as an antibiotic or anti-inflammatory enhancer, through a local administration route such as the inhalation route, to have the greatest concentration of the active in the site of action. However, it would be appropriate to conduct in vivo studies to confirm this hypothesis, as there are only a few so far (
Table 1).
Table 1. N-acetylcysteine studies in vivo on CF patients in literature.
Administration Route
|
Posology
|
NAC Activity
|
Comments
|
Reference
|
Oral
|
0.6 to 1.0 g three times daily, for 4 weeks
|
Inflammation modulator/antioxidant
|
Safe treatment; decrease of sputum elastase activity (p = 0.006); decrease of neutrophil burden in CF airways (p = 0.003); pulmonary function measures not improved.
|
[13]
|
Oral
|
900 mg three times/day for 24 weeks
|
Inflammation modulator/antioxidant
|
Lung function (FEV1 and FEF 25–75% remained stable or increased slightly in the NAC group but decreased in the placebo group (p = 0.02 and 0.02). Log10 HNE activity remained equal between cohorts (difference 0.21, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.48, p = 0.14).
|
[28]
|
Oral
|
200 mg three times/daily or 400 mg three times daily
|
Inflammation modulator/antioxidant
|
Patients with PEFR below 70% of predicted normal values showed a satisfactory significant increase in PEFR, FVC and in one second FEV during NAC treatment. No effect of NAC on ciliary activity was observed.
|
[29]
|
Oral
|
700 mg /daily (low dose) or 2800 mg/daily (high dose)
|
Inflammation modulator/antioxidant
|
High-dose NAC was a well-tolerated and safe medication. High-dose NAC did not alter clinical or inflammatory parameters. However, extracellular glutathione in induced sputum tended to increase on high-dose NAC.
|
[30]
|
Oral
|
2400 mg/ daily for 4 weeks
|
Inflammation modulator/antioxidant
|
A better lung function was observed in the NAC treated group with a mean (SD) change compared to baseline of FEV1% predicted of 2.11 (4.6), while a decrease was observed in the control group (change—1.4 (4.6)), though not statistically significant.
|
[31]
|
FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV: forced expiratory volume; HNE: human neutrophil elastase; PEFR: peak expiratory flow rate.