Metal nanoparticles sit on a metal oxide serve as active sites for the electron transfer. Transition metals such as Cu, Ni, and Fe are particularly energetic for activating CO₂. Their surfaces possess high binding abilities to CO₂. DFT calculations evidenced that on Pt, Rh, Ni, Cu, Ag, and Pd (111) surfaces, the affinity toward oxygen is different for the metals, which selects their reaction pathways for the CO₂ activation in the RWGS) reaction. Pt, Ag, and Pd tend to favor the COOH-mediated mechanism, whereas Rh, Ni, and Cu dissociate CO₂ into CO and O [87]. This difference underlines the variation in the CO2 dissociation barrier of the different metal groups. Thus, the nature of the interaction between the adsorbed O and the surface is critical for determining the CO2 dissociation barrier. In the activation of CO₂ via the charge transfer mode, which is prevalent on metal surfaces, the partial and full charge transfer leads to the formation of CO₂^δ− and CO₂⁻, respectively. The degree of charge transfer can be analyzed on metal surfaces after adsorption. Physisorption and chemisorption of CO₂ on single crystal surfaces of various metals have been studied by means of DFT calculations [88]. Chemisorption states are highly dependent on both the metal itself and adsorption sites. Chemisorbed CO₂ molecules often have a bent structure with O–C–O angle varying between 121 and 140° compared with the nearly linear coordination of the physisorbed CO₂ molecules, and their extent depends on the kind of metal surface. In other words, the degree of CO₂ activation varies with metal surfaces. Similar behavior can be observed for the amount of charge transferred. According to Wang et al. [89], who investigated CO₂ chemisorption on nine transition metal surfaces (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Rh, Pd, Ag, Pt, and Au), the adsorption strength is affected by both the d-band center of the metal surface and the charge transfer, which control the activation of the C=O bond. It is possible to promote chemisorption by adjusting the properties of the catalysts, such as the catalyst surface area, surface defects, basic sites, and the addition of promoters [31].

The coordination of CO₂ with metals can take different modes via the electron-deficient C atom as the electron acceptor and the C=O bonds or O atoms as the electron donor. Electron-rich metal surfaces such as Ni (110) and Cu (100) generally activate CO₂ by attaching to the carbon atom [90,91]. In the process, electrons in the d_z² orbital of the metal transfer to the unpopulated antibonding π* orbital of the CO₂ molecule. Consequently, negatively charged surfaces are efficient for CO₂ activation via the charge transfer mode. Such charged surfaces can be generated through inserting strong metal-support interaction, bimetallic and ligand effects, etc. [85]. Electron-deficient metal surfaces, such as Ti, Cr, V, and Mn, favor the end-on coordination with CO₂ [92]. In this mode, the bending or distortion of the linear CO₂ molecule is difficult [85]. For metal centers with combined binding behavior, i.e., possessing both an electron acceptor site and an electron donor site, CO₂ adsorption generally prefers the bridge sites. More efficient activation can result through this mechanism and lead to bending of the linear CO₂ molecule from different sites [85].

Investigations by DFT calculations revealed the characteristic adsorption and activation of CO₂ on Rh, Pd, Pt, Ni, Fe, Cu, Re, Al, Mg, and Ag metals [87,93]. Strong evidence has been provided for the formation of CO₂⁻ according to spectroscopic results. Depending on the type of metal, CO₂ can also dissociate into CO and O or be transformed into CO₃²⁻ and CO. The activation of CO₂ on Pt, Rh, Ni, Cu, Ag, and Pd followed different elementary steps as a result of the different levels of interaction of the metals with adsorbed oxygen in the RWGS reaction. Metals with high affinities toward oxygen presented lower activation barriers, leading to facile hydrogenation reactions [87]. The presence of preadsorbed oxygen was responsible for forming carbonates of different structures [87,93]. On most metal surfaces, CO₂ activation is highly surface orientated, pressure- and particle size-dependent [89,94,95,96]. For e.g., Yu et al. [96] demonstrated through spin-polarized DFT calculations that adsorption and dissociation of CO₂ were dependent on the Co particle size. They showed that Co₅₅ nanoclusters had the highest CO₂ dissociation activity in comparison to Co₁₃ and Co₃₈. However, Co₁₃ activated CO₂ with the smallest O–C–O angle (123°) against 137° for both Co₃₈ and Co₅₅ nanoclusters.

Cu-based materials have gained much attention in the CO₂ conversion process due to their wide applicability in the different conversion processes and low cost [12,97]. Despite these and other massive studies, the activation of CO₂ on Cu catalysts is still an issue due to the poor understanding of its mechanism. Studies have shown that CO₂ interacts weakly on low-index Cu surfaces under UHV conditions [98,99]. However, a recent study found Cu (100) surface to be more active in dissociating CO₂ than Cu (111), producing atom oxygen [91]. Ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) and DFT calculations revealed the activation of CO₂ on Cu surfaces. APXPS showed that CO₂ adsorbed as CO₂^δ− on Cu (111) surface under a pressure of 0.01 mbar at 300 K. With an increase in pressure to 1 mbar, adsorbed CO₂^δ− partially transformed into carbonate as a result of the disproportionation reaction between CO₂ molecules. Subsequent annealing at 400 K or higher temperatures led to the dissociation of CO₂^δ− and carbonate and the formation of a chemisorbed oxygen-covered surface. On Cu (110) surface, the CO₂^δ− gradually dissociated into CO and chemisorbed oxygen under the same CO₂ pressure at room temperature. On both surfaces, atomic oxygen was generated that catalyzed the self-deactivation of CO₂ adsorption. The DFT results, which collaborated experimental findings, further indicated that the Cu (110) surface was more active than the Cu (111) surface in breaking C–O bonds [95]. Comparing the adsorption of CO₂ on Cu (111), (100), and (110) surfaces, it was found that CO₂ molecules aligned parallel to Cu (111) and (100), whereas a vertical configuration was more stable for the adsorbed CO₂ on Cu (110) with one of two oxygen atoms towards the surface. The degree of CO₂ activation followed the order: Cu (110) > Cu (100) > Cu (111) [89]. A decrease in the activation energies for CO₂ dissociation has been observed when Cu surfaces have step or kink defects in comparison with the flat surface. Chemisorption of CO₂ was reported on Cu stepped surfaces [98,99,100,101].

Ni-based catalysts can dissociate and convert CO₂ into value-added products, such as methane; thus, a fundamental understanding of the interaction between CO₂ and Ni surface at the atomic level is crucial to design even more efficient Ni-based catalysts. According to theoretical studies, the surface orientation of Ni influences the activation of CO₂ by altering the energetics for subsequent C–O bond cleavage [102]. Ab initio calculations using slab models have shown that CO₂ reactions on model Ni are surface sensitive, with reactivity in the following trend: Ni (110) > Ni (100) > Ni (111) [102,103]. Experimental investigations revealed the capability of Ni (110) surface to molecularly adsorb and subsequently dissociate CO₂ at room temperature [104]. By using in situ APXPS, carbonate was identified as the dominating surface intermediate at room temperature upon CO₂ adsorption on Ni (111) and Ni (110) surfaces [105,106,107]. However, where there are multiple dissociation products, their distribution depends on the surfaces. Carbonate, CO, and graphitic carbon were all observed on both Ni (111) and Ni (100) surfaces under a CO₂ pressure of 0.2 Torr. Ni (111) was predominantly covered with carbonate, whereas adsorbed CO* and graphitic carbon were prevalent on the Ni (100) surface as indicated in Figure 1a–d [107]. The CO₂ adsorption and dissociation on ideal Ni (111) and stepped Ni (211) surfaces are shown in Figure 1e. It can be seen that CO₂ adsorption is endothermic by 20 kJ·mol⁻¹ on Ni (111) surface, whereas it is exothermic by 40 kJ·mol⁻¹ on Ni (211) surface [108].

Based on the experimental results of the ultrahigh vacuum (UHV), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), and high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HREELS), it is difficult for CO₂ to adsorb on a clean Pt (111) surface between 110 and 300 K, but the dissociation capability can be improved by doping alkali metals such as potassium [109,110]. Conversely, it was reported that Pt foil treated with CO₂ in the gas phase during in situ UHVXPS experiments at 77 K formed chemisorbed CO species [111]. In collaboration with the latter assertion, on the clean Pt (111) surface, CO₂ dissociated into adsorbed CO and O at both room and elevated temperatures [112]. The production of adsorbed CO increased upon the introduction of H₂ (hydrogenation reaction). This observation was obvious for the CO₂ adsorption at all temperatures and led to the deoxygenation (consumption of oxygen) of the surface, cleaning the sites for further CO production and desorption from the surface at elevated temperatures. The Pt surface was active in the RWGS reaction. At low pressure, the RWGS was initiated at 300 °C; on the contrary, at high pressure (H₂:CO₂ of 150 mtorr: 15 mtorr), a low temperature (200 °C) favored the initiation of the RWGS reaction, and the conversion of CO₂ increased with increasing temperatures [112]. Moreover, under a pressure of 40 mtorr of pure CO₂ and at temperatures below 150 °C, graphitic carbon has been also observed as a product of the Boudouard reaction. IR spectroscopy revealed the size-dependent nature of CO₂ adsorption on Pt clusters. On small Pt clusters anions (Pt_n⁻, n = 4–7), CO₂ was highly activated but remained molecularly adsorbed on Pt₄⁻. On large clusters, dissociative adsorption was observed [13].

Bimetallic surfaces are highly unique and active for a wide range of CO₂ transformation reactions due to the electronic and geometric alterations within the structure. These alterations could be observed as a change in the morphology of metal, adsorption mode and configuration, and chemical ordering with varying composition and particle size [8,34]. This can help to control the adsorption properties to attain desired adsorption coverages. Numerous studies have discussed both activation of CO₂ and the subsequent conversion of CO₂ to fuels and chemicals on bimetallic catalysts. Ko et al. [88] studied the CO₂ activation and adsorption by performing DFT calculations on a range of bimetallic alloy surfaces. The dissociation energy barriers of CO₂ were screened by combining Bronsted–Evans–Polanyi (BEP) relation, scaling relation, and surface mixing rule. It was found that CO₂ dissociated into CO and O, which sum of their adsorption energies was linearly related to both the energy for CO₂ dissociation and that for CO₂^δ− adsorption. The activation of CO₂ proceeded through a direct dissociation (CO₂ → CO + O) mechanism in three successive elementary steps: physisorption of CO₂ from the gas phase on the metal surface, chemisorption of CO₂^δ− from the physisorbed CO₂, and direct dissociation of CO₂^δ− into CO and O.

The predicted activation energies for the CO₂ dissociation on bimetallic alloy surfaces are shown in Figure 2, with the row and column indicating the host and solute metals of the bimetallic alloys, respectively. The alloying effect would lead to a reduction in surface reactions when the solute metals are placed in the bulk region. In the figure, the activation energy (E_a^act) decreases from right to left and from bottom to top, thus alloys with relatively low activation energies (~0.75 eV) are Fe-, Ru-, Co-, Ni-, Rh-, and Ir-based alloys, whereas Pd-, Pt-, and Cu-based alloys possess high activation energies (~1.51 eV). Still, some metals, including Ru-, Co-, Ni-, Rh-, Ir-, and Cu-based alloys, have activation energies in between the extremes (0.76–1.50 eV). This picture makes sense for fabricating bimetallic catalysts for CO₂ conversion reactions by manipulating the activation energies [88].

The mechanisms of CO₂ dissociation on bimetallic clusters (Pt₃Ni₁, Pt₂Ni₂, and Pt₁Ni₃) were investigated and characterized by the activation barrier [21]. Compared with the single metallic clusters (Pt₄ and Ni₄), results showed the activation barrier to be between those of the monometallic clusters. Increasing Ni atoms in the bimetallic clusters moderately raised the activation barrier, which means that such a bimetal combination could have a significant negative impact on the activity of Pt for CO₂ reaction [21].

Results from an ab initio study of chemisorption and activation of CO₂ on Pt-based transition-metal nanoalloys on 55-atom nanoclusters (Pt_nTM_55−n), where n = 0, 13, 42, 55, and TM = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Os, Ir, Au, indicated a linear correlation between the interaction energy, charge transfer from the nanoclusters toward CO₂ and the bent CO₂ angle [8]. It was further realized that the interaction energy was enhanced for larger angles and molecular charge. With 55 atoms for Cu, Ag and Au in the Pt alloy, a change from physisorption to chemisorption was observed, whereas the strong interaction energy of CO₂ with Os₅₅, Ru₅₅, and Fe₅₅ can be decreased by alloying with Pt [8]. It means that certain metals (Fe, Co, and Ni) activate CO₂ more strongly as monometals than in an alloyed form due to weaker adsorption energy in the latter.

Various metal oxides (MO_x) or (M_xO_y) are investigated as supports or as catalysts for CO₂ conversion, including In₂O₃, CeO₂, ZnO, ZrO₂, TiO₂, and CeO₂. Metal oxide surfaces consist of both metal (Mⁿ⁺) and oxygen (O²⁻) ions, which are effective sites for CO₂ activation. The activation can occur by coordination to one or two adjacent metal sites through the terminal oxygen atoms or C atom of the CO₂ molecule, forming monodentate or bidentate carbonate species [114]. Interaction of the C atom is on the surface oxygen sites of the metal oxide. The CO₂ activation can also occur via the σ-bond and π-bonds activation on metal ions and oxygen ions, respectively, as observed upon chemisorption on metal oxides applied as catalyst supports [115]. Due to the large surface areas, switchable redox properties, and rich oxygen vacancies, metal oxides can act as adsorption and activation sites for small molecules, including O₂, H₂, and CO₂ [116]. The surface oxygen vacancies interact with the carbon and/or oxygen atoms of CO₂ through which electron transfer from the oxide defective site to adsorbed CO₂ becomes feasible. One example is In₂O₃, which is rich in oxygen vacancies and has shown a high activity for CO₂ activation and methanol synthesis by hydrogenation [116].

On oxide surfaces, generally, CO₂ interactions can vary from physisorption to chemisorption, the extent that affects the structure and reactivity of the adsorbed CO_2, and the kinetics and mechanisms of surface catalytic reactions [114]. The surface structure is important for CO₂ adsorption and activation [117]; thus, the interaction of CO₂ with metal oxides can be structure-dependent. It was found that CO₂ adsorption on Zn₂GeO₄ (001) was higher than that on Zn₂GeO₄ (010) surface [117]. The interaction with (010) surface led to bidentate carbonate species, whereas on the (001) surface, stronger interaction with CO₂ resulted in a bridged carbonate-like species. The strongest adsorption based on calculated CO₂ adsorption energies was around the surface oxygen vacancy site on both surfaces. Analysis of the LDOS and Mulliken charge for adsorbed CO₂ on perfect Zn₂GeO₄ surfaces revealed that CO₂ formed a CO₂^δ− species upon accepting electrons from the surface. CO₂ molecule was found to be activated on the CuO surfaces ((011), (111), and (−111)), with strong adsorption only on the (011) surface. The CuO (111) and CuO (−111) surfaces showed relatively weak adsorption. CO₂ activation was characterized by structural transformations and charge transfer that resulted in the formation of bent CO₂^δ− species with an elongation of the C–O bonds [94].

The ability of metal oxides to bind and activate CO₂ depends greatly on several factors, including their preparation methods, physiochemical properties, redox properties, and electronic and geometric structures [108,114,118]. The preparation methods were found to impact the properties of CeO₂ nanostructures for the photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ [119]. A high surface area was obtained for catalysts synthesized through the sunlight-assisted combustion process, in addition to possessing a small particle size, high concentration of oxygen vacancies, and a narrow bandgap. Compared to that prepared from the conventional combustion process with a spongy-like structure, a porous network consisting of small and uniformed pores was also obtained for the sunlight-assisted process. The superior catalytic properties could be attributed to the novel properties endowed by solar irradiation during the synthesis process. As demonstrated with the CeO_x/Cu catalyst, the important roles of metal oxide ions were revealed on the catalytic cycle of H₂O and CO₂ activation. The Cu phase was reduced into Cu⁰ that promoted Ce⁴⁺ reduction into Ce³⁺. H₂O and CO₂ activation occurred on the Ce³⁺ sites. Without the presence of Cu, Ce³⁺ would lead to oxidation into Ce⁴⁺. However, in contact with Ce⁴⁺, Cu⁰ reacted to form Cu⁺ and Ce³⁺, sustaining ceria in the more active state. The cycle is closed when Cu⁺ reduced to Cu⁰ [120]. This synergistic effect afforded the catalyst with high reactivity in the RWGS reactions. The chemisorption of CO₂ molecules on CeO₂ at RT as studied using in situ DRIFTS indicated adsorption at both the Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺ sites, although adsorption was also found at the oxygen sites that resulted in carbonates and bicarbonates species [121]. In the same study, the CO₂ chemisorption on TiO₂ under similar reaction conditions and instrumentation was observed at both Ti³⁺ and Ti⁴⁺ sites, exhibiting O–C–O vibrations at 1667 and 1248 cm⁻¹ and 2339–2345 cm⁻¹, respectively [121]. The CO₂ molecules adsorbed at Ti³⁺ sites formed CO₂⁻ species, which concentration increased with the amount of oxygen vacancies present. Like with CeO₂, CO₂ chemisorption at the oxygen sites formed carbonates and bicarbonates species. It was observed that the interaction between TiO₂ and CO₂ molecules is somewhat weak compared with that of CeO₂. Such weak interactions can be improved by doping TiO₂ with CeO₂. CeO₂ doping can improve the interaction of TiO₂ with CO₂ as a result of the introduction of Ce³⁺, which strengthens the bonding of CO₂ with catalyst surfaces and enhances the production of bidentate carbon species that can readily be transformed to surface CO₂⁻ in the presence of H₂O under solar irradiation. The formation of adsorbed species of CO₂ over CeO₂/TiO₂ could be attributed to the binding of CO₂ species to Ti/Ce atoms that have reductive capabilities under photo-irradiation. Furthermore, the Ce³⁺ availability from CeO₂ facilitates photogenerated charge separation; thus, the CO₂ adsorption and enhanced charge separation can be tuned for increased activity of CeO₂/TiO₂ catalyst [122]. The surface area of materials positively correlates with their adsorption capacity. It was found that the Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂ nanotubes had a higher adsorption capacity for CO₂ (~4.3 times) than bulk Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂ due to the higher BET specific surface area of the former. As a result, the effective adsorption of CO₂ on Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂ nanotubes over bulk Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂ favored the photocatalytic process [123]. In addition, the high surface area correlated with strong adsorption. Weak chemisorption of CO₂ has been reported for CeO₂ nanostructures with low exposed surface area [121]. Mesostructured photocatalyst displayed improved activity for CO₂ reduction into CH₄ due to the presence of high specific surface area and well-developed mesostructure that enhanced adsorption of CO₂ [124]. Highly mesoporous In(OH)₃ synthesized via the sol-gel hydrothermal treatment exhibited ~20-fold higher efficiency for CO₂ reduction in comparison with those lacking mesopores [125]. It is reported that the methanol activity of the In₂O₃ catalyst could also be improved by increasing the (111) surface area [126].

Ceria (CeO₂) has shown catalytic activity in the reduction of CO₂ to liquid fuels and chemicals. It has rich oxygen vacancies and high oxygen storage/release capacity. Several studies demonstrating the interaction of CO₂ with high-surface-area ceria catalysts have been reported. As noted in ref [127], CO₂ dissociates into CO and an oxygen-containing surface species on the surface Ce³⁺ ions, which are considered active sites for CO₂ activation due to the formation of carbonates or inorganic carboxylates. Graciani et al. reported a highly active CeO_x/Cu nanoparticles catalyst for methanol synthesis from CO₂ [128]. The catalyst activated CO₂ as CO₂^δ− and exhibited a faster methanol production rate than Cu/ZnO, on which CO₂ was chemisorbed as CO₃²⁻. A study on the CO₂ adsorption sites of CeO₂ (110) surface using DFT was carried out by Cheng et al. [129]. Reduced and stoichiometric ceria (110) surfaces were compared. Results revealed that CO₂ adsorption on the reduced ceria (110) surface was thermodynamically favored than on the stoichiometric ceria (110) surface. Furthermore, the most stable adsorption configuration consisted of CO₂ adsorbed parallel to the reduced ceria (110) surface at the oxygen vacancy. Upon adsorption, the CO₂ molecule distorted out of the plane and formed carbonates with the remaining oxygen anion at the surface [129]. It was suggested that the structural changes in the catalyst after CO₂ adsorption were due to charge transfer between the surface and adsorbate molecule. The formation of two different adsorbate species: a carbonate and a weakly bound and linear physisorbed species, were observed upon exposure of reduced CeO_2−x (110) substrates to CO₂ at low temperatures. There was no evidence for the formation of CO₂^δ−. Furthermore, based on angle-dependent C K-edge NEXAFS spectra, the most preferred orientation of the adsorbate could not be observed. The physisorbed CO₂ species and carbonate species were completely desorbed at 250 and 500 K, respectively. The authors remarked that it is most unlikely that the activation of CO₂ on the reduced CeO_2−x (110) surface was via breaking the C=O bond to form CO and O. However, on fully oxidized CeO₂ (110), CO₂ adsorbed as a carbonate which was completely decomposed and desorbed as CO₂ at 400 K [130]. CO₂ adsorbed on the CeO₂ (111) surface formed monodentate carbonate species found to be most stable on CeO₂ at low coverages [131]. Increasing the CO₂ coverage destabilized the formed species, indicating a mixed adsorption mechanism with both carbonate and linearly adsorbed CO₂ species. Although CeO₂ has been studied for CO₂ reduction reactions, the insights into CO₂ adsorption, activation, and reaction on ceria surfaces are not yet fully understood.

Titania (TiO₂) possesses good photocatalytic properties for many chemical reactions, including CO₂ reduction. Since its first demonstration in the photoelectrochemical CO₂ reduction to formic acid and formaldehyde by Inoue et al. [132], TiO₂-based materials have attracted great research interests in CO₂ photoreduction reactions. The adsorption properties of CO₂ on both the rutile and anatase phases of TiO₂ have been widely studied using various surface science techniques [133,134,135,136]. Sorescu et al. [137] investigated the adsorption and dissociation of CO₂ on an oxidized anatase (101) surface using dispersion-corrected DFT and found CO₂ to adsorbed at a fivefold coordinated Ti site in a tilted configuration. Based on in situ FTIR experiments, the CO₂ adsorption formed CO₃²⁻ and CO₂ bonded to Ti, with absorption bands at 1319, 1376, 1462, 1532, 1579, and 2361 cm⁻¹. The band at 2361 cm⁻¹ was assigned to adsorbed CO₂ with Ti–O–C–O adsorption configuration [138]. The 1319 and 1579 cm⁻¹ bands were assigned to bidentate carbonate, while the band at 1461 cm⁻¹ was due to monodentate or free carbonate. Under the vacuum condition, the intensities of all of the bands were reduced at 35 °C. The bidentate carbonate was the predominant species for CO₂ on TiO₂. The scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) enabled a study of the dissociation of CO₂ adsorbed at the oxygen vacancy of TiO₂ (110) at the single-molecule level [139]. It was found that the electrons injected from the STM tip into the adsorbed CO₂ caused its dissociation into CO and O, and the released O was observed to heal the oxygen vacancy. According to experimental analysis, ~1.4 eV above the conduction band minimum of TiO₂ is needed for the electron induction process to dissociate CO₂. The formation of a transient negative ion by the injected electron is an important step in the CO₂ dissociation, and this can only be possible above the threshold voltage. TiO₂ modified with metal oxide nanoclusters possess enhanced activity to adsorb and convert CO₂ [26,140]. The Bi₂O₃-TiO₂ heterostructures obtained by modifying TiO₂ with Bi had low coordinated Bi sites in the nanoclusters and a valence band edge consisting mainly of Bi–O states due to the presence of the Bi lone pair. Upon interaction of CO₂ with the reduced heterostructures, CO or CO₂⁻ were observed mainly through electron transfer to CO₂, and the Bi₂O₃–TiO₂ heterostructures became oxidized in the process with adsorbed CO₂ in carbonate form [140]. In a related study, clean or hydroxylated extended rutile and anatase TiO₂ surfaces modified with Cr nanoclusters presented an upshift valence band edge related to the existence of Cr 3d–O 2p interactions, which promoted the CO₂ activation. [26]. The activated CO₂ molecule reduced its O–C–O angle to 127–132° and increased the C–O bond length to 1.30 Å. It was concluded that the strong CO₂–Cr–O interaction induced the structural distortions.

Iron oxides (FeO_x) are an important component of catalysts for the conversion of CO₂ to hydrocarbons (liquid fuels). The adsorption and activation of CO₂ on FeO_x have been investigated by researchers [141,142,143]. It is suggested that Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ cations are crucial for CO₂ adsorption. Using TPD, Pavelec et al. [141] observed a weak interaction between CO₂ and Fe₃O₄ (001) surface. On this surface, CO₂ molecules existed in the physisorbed state as they desorbed at a low temperature (115 K). However, strong CO₂ adsorption was observed on the defects and surface Fe³⁺ sites. Weak CO₂ adsorption has also been observed on Fe₃O₄ (111) as investigated by various experimental techniques [144]. At different CO₂ dosages and temperatures (between 120 and 140 K), TPD experiments suggested CO₂ adsorb very weakly on a regular Fe₃O₄ (111) surface. However, CO₂ chemisorption was also observed but at relatively long CO₂ exposure times [144,145] via binding to under-coordinated oxygen sites [145]. The formation of chemisorbed species such as carboxylates and carbonates was facilitated by surface imperfections. Conclusively, FeO_x exhibit weak interaction with CO₂ molecules, and studies are recommended in this direction to adjust its CO₂ adsorption strength.

ZrO₂ has been demonstrated as catalyst support for the CO₂ hydrogenation reactions to a variety of products. In a study on CO₂ hydrogenation on Cu/ZrO₂ catalyst using the first-principles kinetic Monte Carlo simulations by Tang et al. [146], the authors showed that CO₂ prefers to adsorb on the bare ZrO₂ nanoparticles surface rather than at the Cu/ZrO₂ interface. This led to the bending of the CO₂ molecule with a calculated adsorption energy of 0.69 eV. The stretching of the C–O bonds and charge transfer from the ZrO₂ surface to the antibonding 2π_μ orbital of CO₂ were also observed. On the bare ZrO₂ surface, bidentate bicarbonate (HCO₃) was formed upon CO₂ adsorption based on observable IR frequencies at ~1225, ~1620, and ~3615 cm⁻¹ [147].