In this section, we will focus on Trichuriasis in two neo-tropical deer species, which are the brocket deer (
Mazama spp.) and the white-tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus). Knight et al. [
5] analysed the morphometry of adult (male and female)
Trichuris found in the caecum of the white-tailed deer. Based on the morphometry of this helminth, he proposed a new species called
Trichuris odocoileus. Prior to this, endoparasites in white-tailed deer was studied and several authors identified
Trichuris ovis in the caecum of deer (based on morphometry) [
6,
7,
8].
Trichuris ovis and
T skrjabini has also been reported in sheep that share similar pastures to deer [
9]. The prevalence of
Trichuris ovis in white-tailed deer is relatively low and it seems to have little clinical effect on the animal. The prevalence was reported as 3.3% [
8], 15% [
9], and 3.4% [
7]. Similar prevalence values have been reported in cattle: 3.8% [
10], 1.26% [
11], 7.3% and 13.2% [
12]. Large ruminants such as the bison were found to have a low rate of infection, as low as 1% [
13]. In contrast, small ruminants (sheep and goats) had a wide range of prevalence for
Trichuris [
14,
15]. Using faecal flotation, sheep and goats had a prevalence of 40.46% and 50.51% [
15], 4.9% and 4.1% [
14]. Using morphological techniques, the prevalence in sheep and goat was 8.9% and 6.7% [
14]. Further research on sheep reported a variable prevalence of 6.25% (using faecal flotation) and 27.42% (using morphology of adults) [
16]. Recently, Yevstafieva et al. [
17] reported 65% of sheep were infected with
Trichuris spp. using morphological techniques. Knight and Tuff [
18] identified
Trichuris skrjabini in Sika deer (
Cervus Nippon) based on morphological analysis but the animals showed no overt signs of disease. Cook et al. [
19] noted that whipworms in the white-tailed deer had a prevalence of 4.76% (4/84) but failed to identify the species of the parasite. It must also be noted that one study failed to identify
Trichuris spp. in white-tailed deer but found it in the Sambar deer living in the same population [
19]. Interestingly, there were few studies that investigated the causes of morbidity and mortality of farmed white-tailed deer. In this review, based on morphological data, only one (1/347) case of
Trichuris spp. infestation was identified as a cause of death in farmed white-tailed deer [
20].
In recent times, archaeological studies have identified
Trichuris spp. in deer that inhabited the neo-tropics [
21,
22]. These samples were found in Brazil and Argentina and shed some light on parasitism by
Trichuris in wild deer species before colonisation. It also shows that these parasites were present in these animals before the arrival of domesticated livestock. Disease surveys have been conducted on free-ranging grey brocket deer in Bolivia and Brazil [
23,
24]. The authors noted that these animals were in good body condition before samples were taken. The prevalence was very low, which was similar to other reports in neo-tropical deer species with 9.09% (1/11) in Bolivia [
23]. Lux Hoppe [
24] was unable to detect
Trichuris in deer samples that were collected. However, it must be noted that Lux Hoppe [
24] did not analyse caecal or colonic contents which are the predilection sites for this parasite. Some work was done on the causes of mortality in Key deer (
Odocoileus virginianus clavium) in Florida [
25]. The authors identified several causes of morbidity and mortality in these animals such as haemonchosis, highway mortality and chronic purulent infection [
25]. However, the effect of endoparasites on mortality was overlooked as well as the effect of individual parasites such as species of
Trichuris.
Trichuris spp. was identified in the gastrointestinal tracts of white-tailed deer and pampas deer in Mexico and Uruguay [
26,
27]. Thus, in these neo-tropical regions more work has to be done to investigate the prevalence of this parasite and its effect on wild populations. There were numerous investigations on gastrointestinal parasites found in deer in the neo-tropics. Most of these reports did not identify
Trichuris spp. in the gastrointestinal tracts of white-tailed deer and fallow deer [
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34]. Interestingly, the studies mentioned above used morphological techniques as the method of parasite identification. This shows that the use of this technique as the sole means of identification of parasites can be inaccurate. In summary, the prevalence of this parasite found in deer within the neo-tropics is generally low.