Enzyme Based Biosensors: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Engineering, Industrial
Contributor:
Hafiz M. N. Iqbal

Enzyme-based biosensors were the earliest biosensors. In 1962, Clark proposed the idea of enzyme electrodes for a glucose sensor. Subsequently, enzyme-based biosensors have been experimenting a massive growth in several applications.

  • biosensors
  • enzymes
  • nanozymes
  • laccase
  • glucose oxidase
  • horseradish peroxidase

1. Introduction

The biological component used in enzyme-based biosensors is an enzyme. Enzymes are biological macromolecules with catalytic activity, high selectivity, and responsible for speeding up biochemical reactions under mild conditions [1]. These macromolecules can attach to one particular molecule or analyte, but not others to ensure the analyte selectivity. Due to their high specificity, simplicity, and scalability, enzyme-based biosensors represent a fast, precise, and continuous monitoring of analytes [2]. Additionally, the high specificity of enzymes enhances the ability to detect lower analyte concentration limits [3]. Additionally, the catalytic action can be influenced by the substrate concentration, temperature, pH, and inhibitor presence [3]. The enzyme functions could be the generation of electroactive species or an electroactive reactant’s consumption, causing the direct measurement of the analyte [4], or for oxidation or reduction of a molecule, which can be monitored electrochemically [5].
The crucial factor in enzyme-based biosensors is the assembly or immobilization of the enzyme on the electrode surface [6]. If the immobilization is not correctly done, the accessibility of the active site, the stability through time, and the enzyme’s reusability could be affected. The enzymes can be immobilized on the transducer surface to improve the stability and reproducibility of the detection. The choice of support material is essential for conferring stability, selectivity and even improve enzyme activity. Consequently, the support material must be inert, stable, and resistant [7]. The immobilization technique is highly significant; without immobilization, the enzyme cannot be stable and reusable. The immobilized enzymes can be used continuously and can maintain their catalytic activity. Adsorption, covalent bonding, crosslinking, encapsulation and entrapment are the main methods used for immobilization [8][9]. The simplest methods are adsorption, encapsulation, and entrapment. Adsorption is inexpensive and straightforward; however, the enzymes have weak associations with the support [7]. Entrapment gives the enzyme high stability; however, the matrix can interfere with substrates’ diffusion to the enzyme’s active site. Covalent bonding is the most used method because a stable complex between the enzyme and support is generated [6]. Nevertheless, the formation of the covalent bonding could affect the enzyme activity. Crosslinking immobilization improves the stability and efficiency due to the stable binding between enzymes, generally formed with a reactant as glutaraldehyde. However, with reagents, conformational changes in the structure can affect the enzyme activity [10].
Even though the advantages of using enzymes, some disadvantages, such as the rapid loss of enzyme activity due to its interactions with the electrode surface, cause a biosensor’s lifespan is only 2–4 weeks. However, if the enzyme is well stabilized, this can increase [11]. Therefore, choosing a suitable matrix and an excellent strategy to immobilize the enzyme [9]. Enzyme-based biosensors have tremendous applications in food, medicine, and environmental monitoring. Oxidoreductases and peroxidases are the most-reported enzymes in biosensors because they are very stable catalyzing oxide reduction reactions [12]. In this section, we will focus on glucose oxidase (GOx), horseradish peroxidase (HPR), and laccase (Figure 1); these enzymes have been successfully used for different applications in biosensors.
Biosensors 11 00410 g003 550
Figure 1. Enzymes commonly used in biosensors. (a) HRP, (b) laccase, and (c) glucose oxidase.

2. Horseradish Peroxidase

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP, EC 1.11.1.7) is an enzyme that belongs to the group of oxidoreductases. HRP is extensively distributed in nature, and its purification process is relatively simple. The principal source of extraction is the horseradish root. Some advantages reported are high activity and selectivity, resistance to inhibition by substances over a vast concentration, high operability, and reliability over a broad range of treatment conditions [13][14]. In addition, it can catalyze organic and inorganic substrates’ oxidation by reacting with H2O2 and similar molecules [15]. Therefore, HPR is has been widely used in biosensors for H2O2 determination [11].
The detection mechanism of the H2O2 biosensor depends on the electrode (modified or not) and whether the mediator is used or not. The mediator facilities the electron transfer between enzymes and electrodes. In the presence of a mediator, the H2O2 in the solution is reduced by the HRP. On the other hand, the mediator is oxidized in the enzymatic reaction by itself. Moreover, the oxidized mediator is finally reduced on the electrode, with a change in the current. If the mediator is not present, the enzyme is converted to its oxidized form after being reduced at the electrode surface by direct electron transfer [16].
Hydrogen peroxide is an essential intermediate in enzymatic reactions. The detection of H2O2 is essential in medicine, food, and environmental assays (Table 1). As a result, the development of biosensors for H2O2 detection has been extensive [11]. Different materials have been reported to improve the response between the electrode and the HRP enzyme, for example, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), cadmium sulfide, nanofibers, carbon nanomaterials. Carbon nanomaterials have unique properties, such as good biocompatibility, fast electron transfer, and excellent mechanical flexibility. Feizabadi et al. [11] immobilized HRP on a modified multi-walled carbon nanotube by γ- aminobutyric acid (GABA) on a glassy carbon electrode. The covalent bonding formed between the enzyme and GABA increased the stability and reproducibility of the biosensor. Due to its characteristics as low detection (0.13 µM) and extensive linear range (0.2 to 281 µM for H2O2), the biosensor could be used to quantify H2O2 in human plasma.
 
Da Silva Freires et al. [17] developed a biosensor based on copper (I) sulfide (Cu2S) and HRP immobilized on a fluorine-doped tin oxide modified glass slide (FTO) for the determination of 1,4-dihydroxybenzene (DHB). The biosensor showed good selectivity for DHB, and good accuracy when DHB was determined in skin cream samples, presenting recovery percentages for the analyte in the samples between 99.89 and 100.70%, suggesting a good accuracy of the proposed method.
For cancer detection, exosomes can be an alternative as it is a non-invasive technique. Additionally, it is desirable for a cost-effective and instance detection in clinical diagnosis. Zeng et al. [18] developed a versatile biosensor to detect cancer-derived exomes (HepG2 cell-derived). HRP encapsulated DNA nanoflowers were the recognition elements and signal generation. A change of color was proportional to the concentration of exosomes. The system showed a satisfactory colorimetric response toward target exosomes within the working range from 5.0 × 103 to 5.0 × 106 particles/μL at a low detection limit of 3.32 × 103 particles/μL. López-Marco et al. [19] used HRP in a 3D-printed graphene/polylactic electrode and compared the detection of H2O2. The AuNPs facilitate and enhance electron transfer. However, they found that biosensors without AuNPs displayed better stability over time. The response of biosensors was evaluated in human serum.
Table 1. Horseradish peroxidase biosensors.
Material Transduction System Application Linear Range with a lineal Correlation Limit of Detection (LOD) Ref.
Glass plate covered with fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)Copper (I) sulfide (Cu2S) and fluorine-doped tin oxide modified glass slide Photoelectrochemical Health 1,4-dihydroxybenzene (DHB) 10 nmol L−1 up to 1 mmol L−1
(R = 0.998)		 4.0 nmol L−1 [17]
Encapsulated DNA nanoflowers of magnesium pyrophosphate crystals Colorimetric Health Rapid screening of cancer-derived exosomes 5.0 × 103 to 5.0 × 106 particles/μL
(R2 = 0.9846)		 3.32 × 103 particles/μL [18]
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) deposited into a polystyrene tube Chemiluminescent Health Quantification of H2O2 as the oxidizing agent 0.06−10 μM
(R2 = 0.999)		 0.02 μM [20]
Modified multi walled carbon nanotube by γ-aminobutyric acid Electrochemical Food, health, environmental Detection of hydrogen peroxide 2.0 × 10−7 M to 2.81 × 10−4 M
(R2 = 0.998)		 0.13 μM [11]
3D-printed graphene/polylactic (PLA) electrode with gold nanoparticles Electrochemical Environmental and biomedical fields. Hydrogen peroxide detection 25–100 µM
(R = 0.996)		 11.1 µM [19]
HRP-encapsulated protein nanoparticles in an Au electrode surface Electrochemical Clinical applications Hydrogen peroxide detection 0.01–100 μM 0.01 µM [21]
Modified platinum electrode covered with poly(4,7-bis(5-bromothiophen-2-yl) benzothiadiazole) Electrochemical Health 17β- estradiol 0.1 to 200 mM
(R2 = 0.99)		 105 nM [22]
Tungsten microwire modified with AuNPs and 3-mercaptopropionic acid Electrochemical Health Determination of hydrogen peroxide 5 nM to 5 µM
(R = 0.999)		 800 pM [23]
Modified acrylic microspheres Electrochemical Food Chilli hotness determination 0.75–24.94 μM
(R2 = 0.992)		 0.39 µM [24]

3. Glucose Oxidase

Nowadays, measuring blood glucose has been widely studied due to its relevance for health care [25]. Glucose oxidase (GOx) is the principal enzyme used for the devices of glucose monitoring. It is a glycoprotein that possesses orthophosphates proteins. This enzyme has unique properties such as dispersibility in water, resistance to precipitation, and stability. All these advantages make GOx efficient for glucose monitoring in blood or saliva [25]. The continuous monitoring of glucose is vital in diabetes mellitus disease. Therefore, the production of a simple, cost-effective, accurate, and rapid sensor is essential. GOx has still been used for glucose detection due to its reliable stability and substrate specificity. The principle of its operation is the enzymatic oxidation of glucose and after the electrochemical oxidation of H2O2 [26].
Electrochemical biosensors have been used to detect glucose using GOx (Table 2) [27]. The GOx enzyme converts the glucose to gluconic-d-lactone by reducing the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) to FADH2. Then, H2O2 is produced due to FADH2 deoxidized by dissolved O2. Subsequently, the H2O2 is oxidized to O2 when a working potential is applied, and the electric current produced in the biosensor is proportionate to the glucose concentration [28]. The incorporation of nanomaterials as biosensor components has enhanced their performance. Bagyalakshmi et al. [27] prepared ZnO nanorods with chitosan. GOx was immobilized by the adsorption method. The ZnO nanorods were a successful platform for the immobilization of GOx due to their high surface area and displayed a good performance for displaying glucose. The use of carbon nanotubes in glucose biosensors have been improved the enzyme stability and specificity. Jayakumar et al. [29] reported an adsorbed osmium-based redox polymer crosslinked with GOx. It was possible to use less nanoconjugate due to the covalent bond between GOx and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Green approaches also have been made for the development of glucose biosensors. Yang et al. [30] developed an enzyme electrode based on AuNPs, PNE, and GOx for glucose detection by a green method. The biosensor presented high sensitivity to glucose and high response of fewer than 3 s. Redox mediator p-benzoquinone was added to enhance the linear detection range and sensitivity
Table 2. Glucose oxidase biosensors.
Material Transduction System Application Linear Range with a Lineal Correlation Limit of Detection (LOD) Ref.
ZnO nanorods with chitosan Electrochemical Health Glucose determination 10 μM to 40 μM
(R = 0.9998)		   [27]
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes and osmium redox polymer Electrochemical Health Glucose determination     [29]
Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) and polynorepinephrine (PNE) Electrochemical Health Glucose determination in human blood serum samples 0.003 mM to 3.43 mM
(R2 = 0.9987)		 1.34 μM [30]
Glassy carbon electrode with blend nanofibers of poly (vinyl alcohol) and poly(ethyleneimine) Electrochemical Health Glucose in real samples 10 to 30 mmol L−1
(R2 = 0.971)		 0.3 mmol L−1 [6]
Screen-printed carbon electrode with platinum nanoparticles electrodeposited on Poly(Azure A) Electrochemical Food Glucose quantification in real samples 20 μM–2.3mM 7.6 μM [31]

4. Laccase

Laccase (benzenediol: oxidoreductase, E.C. 1.10.3.2) is a multi-copper oxidase considered a green catalyst due to combines the four-electron reduction of dioxygen to water with the one-electron oxidation of four substrate molecules [32][33]. Laccase can be produced by insects, plants, bacteria, or fungi. It is considered a suitable enzyme due to its excellent catalytic properties [34][35]. The substrate range is vast, and they can oxidase different compounds, resulting in the application of numerous biotechnological applications such as environment, food, and biosensors (Table 3) [36].
The laccase biosensor is of the third-generation type. Due to direct electron transfer between the electrode and enzyme, there is no need for a mediator. Laccases are immobilized on the electrode’s surface, and they are oxidized by oxygen and then are reduced by the substrate acting as electron donors for the oxidized form of the enzyme. A reduction current will be observed to reduce the products, which is proportional to their concentration. Unlike peroxidases, laccase-based biosensors only need oxygen and are already present in the solutions, so it is unnecessary to H2O2 for its catalysis [37].
Laccase biosensors have been used widely for dopamine detection. However, even when some analytes’ determination as dopamine has been studied extensively, novel techniques and approaches have been developed. Wardak et al. [38] constructed a laccase-based biosensor constructed by Soft Plasma Polymerization technique for dopamine detection. This technique enhances the sensitivity, and it was proved for pharmaceutical samples with satisfactory results. Furthermore, the use of polysaccharides has been explored. An exopolysaccharide (EPS) named botryosphaeran, and MWCNT were used to immobilize laccase on a glassy carbon electrode to detect dopamine. Even in the presence of other molecules as uric acid, the biosensor could determine the presence of dopamine [39]. Additionally, the fluorescence principle has been used for dopamine detection. Sangubotla and Kim [40] developed a fiber-optic biosensor with carbon dots and laccase. This material presents excellent features such as hydrophobicity, tunable photoluminescence, and biocompatibility.
Table 3. Laccase biosensors.
Material Transduction System Application Linear Range with a Lineal Correlation Limit of Detection Ref.
Laccase hybrid microflowers synthesized with Cu3(PO4)2⋅3H2O Optical Health, clinical diagnosis application Quantification of epinephrine 1–400 μM
(R2 = 0.999)		 0.6 μM [41]
Carbon dots
bio functionalized with 3-(aminopropyl)-triethoxysilane		 Optical Health. Clinical diagnosis application. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Detection of dopamine 0–30 μM
(R2 = 0.995)		 41.2 nM [40]
Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode Electrochemical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Dopamine detection 0.1 μmol/dm3 to 10 μmol/dm3 and from 10 µmol/dm3
to 50 µmol/dm3		 3.63 μA·dm3/μmol and 1.33 μA·dm3/μmol [38]
Fe3O4@SiO2 microspheres stabilized onto glassy carbon electrode Electrochemical Health Dopamine detection 1.5–75 μmol L−1
(R = 0.9980)		 0.177 μmol L−1 [42]
Glassy carbon electrode layered with multi-walled carbon nanotubes using a film of botryosphaeran Electrochemical Health Dopamine and spironolactone detection 2.99–38.5 μmol L−1
(R2 = 0.995)		 0.127 μmol L−1 [39]
Carbon paper electrodes with layered two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) in flowers (MoS2-F) and ribbons (MoS2-R) Electrochemical Synthetic urine sample Dopamine detection 0.1 to 0.5 µM and from 1 to 5 µM (R2 = 0.993) 10 nM [43]
6,9-bis(4-hexylthiophen-2-yl)-11H- indeno[2,1-b]quinoxalin-11-one (M1)) polymerized on electrode surface. Electrochemical Environmental applications Catechol in water 005–0.175 mM
(R2 = 0.994)		 9.86 μM [44]
Screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with carboxyl functionalized multi-wallet carbon nanotubes Electrochemical Environmental application Phenolics detection     [45]

5. Other Enzymes

Another commonly used enzyme in biosensors is the tyrosinase, a polyphenol oxidase (Table 4). Tyrosinase is a natural enzyme that may be produced by bacteria, fungi, plants, and mammals. This enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of various phenolics compounds, and their reaction products could be detected by voltamperometric biosensors [46]. The versatility of this enzyme allows it used in the environmental, medical and food field. García-Guzmán et al. [47] developed a biosensor index in beers and wines using caffeic acid as the reference. The biosensor displayed good analytical performance. Additionally, tyrosinase was used in the environmental field for the construction of a biosensor for detection of bisphenol A in water [48]. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is extensively used in the diagnosis and monitoring of many diseases. This enzyme catalyzes the dephosphorilation of proteins, biomolecules and nuclei acids. A higher level of ALP is related with tumors, biliary obstruction and diabetes [49]. Moreover, it can be used to detect organophosphate pesticide through catalyzes. Stéfanne e Silva et al. [50] immobilized ALP onto a modified non-commercial, low cost and nonrefundable pencil carbon graphite with three polymers derived from hydroxybenzoic acids for pesticide detection. Urease is an enzyme used for the urea detection, its levels are directly related to the protein intake and nitrogen metabolism in humans. Kim et al. [51] developed a portable biosensor for real time monitoring of the flow of physiological fluids on a porous polytetrafluoethylene.
Table 4. Other enzymes commonly used in biosensors.
Enzyme Transduction System Application Linear Range with a Lineal Correlation Limit of Detection (LOD) Ref.
Lipase Electrochemical Environmental application Methyl parathion detection 0.1–38 μM 0.067 μM [52]
Optical Health application Triglycerides detection 100–400 mg/dL 15 mg/dL [53]
Urease Electrochemical Health application Urea detection 1.2–20 mM 1.1 mM [51]
Tyrosinase Electrochemical Environmental application Bisphenol detection 0.05–20 μM 0.011 μM [54]
Electrochemical Food applications Caffeic acid (reference polyphenol indices in beers and wines) 10–300 μM 4.33 μM [47]
Electrochemical Environmental applications Bisphenol detection 5 × 10−8–2 × 10−6 mol L−1 12 nM L−1 [48]
Electrochemical Food applications Benzoic acid detection   0.4 μmol L−1 [55]
Lactate dehydrogenase Electrochemical Health applications Pyruvate detection 5 × 103–1.4 × 105 nM 8.69 nM [56]
Alkaline phosphatase Electrochemical Environmental applications Pesticide detection   20 μM [50]

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/bios11110410

References

  1. Wang, T.; Fan, X.; Li, R.; Xu, J.; Liu, J. Multi-Enzyme-Synergetic ultrathin protein nanosheets display high efficient and switch on/off antibacterial activities. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 416, 129082.
  2. De Jesús Rostro-Alanis, M.; Mancera-Andrade, E.I.; Patiño, M.B.G.; Arrieta-Baez, D.; Cardenas, B.; Martinez-Chapa, S.O.; Saldívar, R.P. Nanobiocatalysis: Nanostructured materials—A minireview. Biocatalysis 2016, 2, 1–24.
  3. Perumal, V.; Hashim, U. Advances in biosensors: Principle, architecture and applications. J. Appl. Biomed. 2014, 12, 1–15.
  4. Ahangari, H.; Kurbanoglu, S.; Ehsani, A.; Uslu, B. Latest trends for biogenic amines detection in foods: Enzymatic biosensors and nanozymes applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 75–87.
  5. Pérez, J.A.C.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Hussain, S.M.; Bilal, M.; Parra, R.; Iqbal, H.M. Bioinspired biomaterials and enzyme-based biosensors for point-of-care applications with reference to cancer and bio-imaging. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 17, 168–176.
  6. Temoçin, Z. Designing of a stable and selective glucose biosensor by glucose oxidase immobilization on glassy carbon electrode sensitive to H2O2 via nanofiber interface. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2021, 51, 283–293.
  7. Gul, I.; Ahmad, M.S.; Naqvi, S.M.S.; Hussain, A.; Wali, R.; Farooqi, A.A.; Ahmed, I. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) based biosensors for detection of phenolic compounds: A Review. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 72–85.
  8. Gonzalez-Coronel, L.A.; Cobas, M.; Rostro-Alanis, M.D.J.; Parra-Saldívar, R.; Hernandez-Luna, C.E.; Pazos, M.; Sanromán, M. Immobilization of laccase of Pycnoporus sanguineus CS43. New Biotechnol. 2017, 39, 141–149.
  9. Alvarado-Ramírez, L.; Rostro-Alanis, M.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J.; Castillo-Zacarías, C.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Barceló, D.; Iqbal, H.M.; Parra-Saldívar, R. Exploring current tendencies in techniques and materials for immobilization of laccases—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 181, 683–696.
  10. Nguyen, H.H.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, U.J.; Fermin, C.D.; Kim, M. Immobilized Enzymes in Biosensor Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 121.
  11. Feizabadi, M.; Soleymanpour, A.; Faridnouri, H.; Ajloo, D. Improving stability of biosensor based on covalent immobilization of horseradish peroxidase by γ-aminobutyric acid and application in detection of H2O2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 597–606.
  12. Cock, L.S.; Arenas, A.M.Z.; Aponte, A.A. Use of Enzymatic Biosensors as Quality Indices: A Synopsis of Present and Future Trends in The Food Industry. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2009, 69, 270–280.
  13. Bilal, M.; Rasheed, T.; Zhao, Y.; Iqbal, H.M. Agarose-chitosan hydrogel-immobilized horseradish peroxidase with sustainable bio-catalytic and dye degradation properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 742–749.
  14. Vineh, M.B.; Saboury, A.A.; Poostchi, A.A.; Rashidi, A.; Parivar, K. Stability and activity improvement of horseradish peroxidase by covalent immobilization on functionalized reduced graphene oxide and biodegradation of high phenol concentration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 1314–1322.
  15. De Oliveira, F.K.; Santos, L.O.; Buffon, J.G. Mechanism of action, sources, and application of peroxidases. Food Res. Int. 2021, 143, 110266.
  16. Ahammad, A.J.S. Hydrogen Peroxide Biosensors Based on Horseradish Peroxidase and Hemoglobin. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, S9, 001.
  17. Da Silva Freires, A.; Botelho, C.N.; Silva, S.M.; Goulart, M.O.F.; Damos, F.S.; Luz, R.D.C.S. Photoelectrochemical biosensor for 1,4-dihydroxybenzene based on copper sulfide and horseradish peroxidase enzyme: Application in skin cream samples. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105487.
  18. Zeng, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Tang, D.; Lin, Y. Horseradish peroxidase-encapsulated DNA nanoflowers: An innovative signal-generation tag for colorimetric biosensor. Talanta 2021, 221, 121600.
  19. Marzo, A.M.L.; Mayorga-Martinez, C.C.; Pumera, M. 3D-printed graphene direct electron transfer enzyme biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 151, 111980.
  20. Bocanegra-Rodríguez, S.; Jornet-Martínez, N.; Molins-Legua, C.; Campíns-Falcó, P. New Reusable Solid Biosensor with Covalent Immobilization of the Horseradish Peroxidase Enzyme: In Situ Liberation Studies of Hydrogen Peroxide by Portable Chemiluminescent Determination. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2419–2427.
  21. Shin, J.-H.; Lee, M.-J.; Choi, J.-H.; Song, J.-A.; Kim, T.-H.; Oh, B.-K. Electrochemical H2O2 biosensor based on horseradish peroxidase encapsulated protein nanoparticles with reduced graphene oxide-modified gold electrode. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 39.
  22. Spychalska, K.; Zając, D.; Cabaj, J. Electrochemical biosensor for detection of 17β-estradiol using semi-conducting polymer and horseradish peroxidase. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 9079–9087.
  23. Narayanan, J.S.; Slaughter, G. AuNPs-HRP microneedle biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of hydrogen peroxide for organ preservation. Med. Devices Sens. 2018, 1, e10015.
  24. Mohammad, R.; Ahmad, M.; Heng, L.Y. Amperometric capsaicin biosensor based on covalent immobilization of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) on acrylic microspheres for chilli hotness determination. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 241, 174–181.
  25. Koushki, E.; Mirzaei Mohammadabadi, F.; Baedi, J.; Ghasedi, A. The effects of glucose and glucose oxidase on the Uv-vis spectrum of gold nanoparticles: A study on optical biosensor for saliva glucose monitoring. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 30, 101771.
  26. Lee, I.; Probst, D.; Klonoff, D.; Sode, K. Continuous glucose monitoring systems—Current status and future perspectives of the flagship technologies in biosensor research. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 181, 113054.
  27. Bagyalakshmi, S.; Sivakami, A.; Balamurugan, K. A Zno nanorods based enzymatic glucose biosensor by immobilization of glucose oxidase on a chitosan film. Obes. Med. 2020, 18, 100229.
  28. Newman, J.D.; Turner, A. Home blood glucose biosensors: A commercial perspective. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20, 2435–2453.
  29. Jayakumar, K.; Bennett, R.; Leech, D. Electrochemical glucose biosensor based on an osmium redox polymer and glucose oxidase grafted to carbon nanotubes: A design-of-experiments optimisation of current density and stability. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 371, 137845.
  30. Liu, Y.; Nan, X.; Shi, W.; Liu, X.; He, Z.; Sun, Y.; Ge, D. A glucose biosensor based on the immobilization of glucose oxidase and Au nanocomposites with polynorepinephrine. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 16439–16446.
  31. Jiménez-Fiérrez, F.; González-Sánchez, M.I.; Jiménez-Pérez, R.; Iniesta, J.; Valero, E. Glucose Biosensor Based on Disposable Activated Carbon Electrodes Modified with Platinum Nanoparticles Electrodeposited on Poly(Azure A). Sensors 2020, 20, 4489.
  32. Barrios-Estrada, C.; de Jesús Rostro-Alanis, M.; Muñoz-Gutiérrez, B.D.; Iqbal, H.M.; Kannan, S.; Parra-Saldívar, R. Emergent contaminants: Endocrine disruptors and their laccase-assisted degradation—A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 1516–1531.
  33. Koyappayil, A.; Kim, H.T.; Lee, M.-H. ‘Laccase-like’ properties of coral-like silver citrate micro-structures for the degradation and determination of phenolic pollutants and adrenaline. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125211.
  34. Zhou, W.; Zhang, W.; Cai, Y. Laccase immobilization for water purification: A comprehensive review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 403, 126272.
  35. Orlikowska, M.; Rostro-Alanis, M.D.J.; Bujacz, A.; Hernández-Luna, C.; Rubio, R.; Parra, R.; Bujacz, G. Structural studies of two thermostable laccases from the white-rot fungus Pycnoporus sanguineus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1629–1640.
  36. Bilal, M.; Jing, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Iqbal, H.M. Immobilization of fungal laccase on glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan beads and its bio-catalytic potential to degrade bisphenol A. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 101174.
  37. Jarosz-Wilkolazka, A.; Ruzgas, T.; Gorton, L. Amperometric detection of mono- and diphenols at Cerrena unicolor laccase-modified graphite electrode: Correlation between sensitivity and substrate structure. Talanta 2005, 66, 1219–1224.
  38. De Oliveira Wardak, C.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Malinowski, S. Application of cold plasma corona discharge in preparation of laccase-based biosensors for dopamine determination. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 116, 111199.
  39. Coelho, J.H.; Eisele, A.; Valezi, C.F.; Mattos, G.; Schirmann, J.G.; Dekker, R.F.; Barbosa-Dekker, A.M.; Sartori, E.R. Exploring the exocellular fungal biopolymer botryosphaeran for laccase-biosensor architecture and application to determine dopamine and spironolactone. Talanta 2019, 204, 475–483.
  40. Sangubotla, R.; Kim, J. Fiber-optic biosensor based on the laccase immobilization on silica-functionalized fluorescent carbon dots for the detection of dopamine and multi-color imaging applications in neuroblastoma cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 122, 111916.
  41. Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, C.; Ma, C.; Tang, J. A smartphone-assisted portable biosensor using laccase-mineral hybrid microflowers for colorimetric determination of epinephrine. Talanta 2021, 224, 121840.
  42. Li, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, T.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, G. Fabrication of biosensor based on core–shell and large void structured magnetic mesoporous microspheres immobilized with laccase for dopamine detection. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 7996–8008.
  43. Rubio-Govea, R.; Hickey, D.P.; García-Morales, R.; Rodriguez-Delgado, M.; Domínguez-Rovira, M.A.; Minteer, S.D.; Ornelas-Soto, N.; García-García, A. MoS2 nanostructured materials for electrode modification in the development of a laccase based amperometric biosensor for non-invasive dopamine detection. Microchem. J. 2020, 155, 104792.
  44. Cevher, C.; Bekmezci, S.A.; Soylemez, S.; Udum, Y.A.; Toppare, L.; Çırpan, A. Indenoquinoxalinone based conjugated polymer substrate for laccase biosensor. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 257, 123788.
  45. Othman, A.M.; Wollenberger, U. Amperometric biosensor based on coupling aminated laccase to functionalized carbon nanotubes for phenolics detection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 855–864.
  46. Bounegru, A.; Apetrei, C. Laccase and Tyrosinase Biosensors Used in the Determination of Hydroxycinnamic Acids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4811.
  47. García-Guzmán, J.J.; López-Iglesias, D.; Cubillana-Aguilera, L.; Lete, C.; Lupu, S.; Palacios-Santander, J.M.; Bellido-Milla, D. Assessment of the Polyphenol Indices and Antioxidant Capacity for Beers and Wines Using a Tyrosinase-Based Biosensor Prepared by Sinusoidal Current Method. Sensors 2019, 19, 66.
  48. Wu, L.; Lu, X.; Niu, K.; Dhanjai; Chen, J. Tyrosinase nanocapsule based nano-biosensor for ultrasensitive and rapid detection of bisphenol A with excellent stability in different application scenarios. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 165, 112407.
  49. Shaban, S.M.; Moon, B.-S.; Pyun, D.-G.; Kim, D.-H. A colorimetric alkaline phosphatase biosensor based on p-aminophenol-mediated growth of silver nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 205, 111835.
  50. e Silva, T.S.; Soares, I.P.; Lacerda, L.R.G.; Cordeiro, T.A.R.; Ferreira, L.; Franco, D.L. Electrochemical modification of electrodes with polymers derived from of hydroxybenzoic acid isomers: Optimized platforms for an alkaline phosphatase biosensor for pesticide detection. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 252, 123221.
  51. Kim, J.Y.; Sung, G.Y.; Park, M. Efficient Portable Urea Biosensor Based on Urease Immobilized Membrane for Monitoring of Physiological Fluids. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 596.
  52. Wang, Z.; Ma, B.; Shen, C.; Cheong, L.-Z. Direct, selective and ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensing of methyl parathion in vegetables using Burkholderia cepacia nanofibers-based biosensor. Talanta 2019, 197, 356–362.
  53. Hasanah, U.; Sani, N.D.M.; Heng, L.Y.; Idroes, R.; Safitri, E. Construction of a Hydrogel Pectin-Based Triglyceride Optical Biosensor with Immobilized Lipase Enzymes. Biosensors 2019, 9, 135.
  54. Mercante, L.; Iwaki, L.; Scagion, V.; Oliveira, O.; Mattoso, L.; Correa, D. Electrochemical Detection of Bisphenol A by Tyrosinase Immobilized on Electrospun Nanofibers Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles. Electrochem 2021, 2, 41–49.
  55. Nedellec, Y.; Gondran, C.; Gorgy, K.; Mc Murtry, S.; Agostini, P.; Elmazria, O.; Cosnier, S. Microcapsule-based biosensor containing catechol for the reagent-free inhibitive detection of benzoic acid by tyrosinase. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 180, 113137.
  56. Mirzaei, F.; Mirzaei, M.; Torkzadeh-Mahani, M. A hydrophobin-based-biosensor layered by an immobilized lactate dehydrogenase enzyme for electrochemical determination of pyruvate. Bioelectrochemistry 2019, 130, 107323.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback