2.2. Comparison of Hydrogen Storage
Figure 3 shows some possible hydrogen storage options, including compression, liquefaction, hydrides, and adsorption. In physical storage, hydrogen can be stored through compression and liquefaction in the form of compressed, liquid, cryo-compressed, and slush hydrogen. In addition, chemical storage converts a broad range of materials to bind or react with hydrogen. These include hydrides (metal, interstitial metal, complex, and chemical hydrides), liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC), reformed organic fuels, and hydrolysis. Among these, compression and metal hydrides are considered efficient methods for small- to medium-scale hydrogen storage [
24]. Integrating large-scale energy storage into the electrical grid has the potential to solve grid problems, including the fluctuation of renewable energy [
25] and storage of surplus energy.
Figure 3. Hydrogen storage options, including physical and chemical storages.
Table 2 lists the characteristics comparison of several representative hydrogen storage methods, including compressed hydrogen, metal hydride, LOHC, liquid hydrogen, and liquid ammonia. These four methods are selected due to their hydrogen storage density, technological maturity, and no involvement of carbon during hydrogen utilization.
Table 2. Brief comparison of representative hydrogen storage technologies [
26,
27,
28,
29].
Properties |
Compressed Hydrogen |
Metal Hydride (MgH2-10wt%Ni) |
Liquid Organic (C7H8/C7H14) |
Liquid Hydrogen |
Liquid Ammonia |
Density (kg/m3) |
39 (69 MPa, 25 °C) |
1,450 |
769 (1 atm, 20 °C) |
70.9 (1 atm, −253 °C) |
682 (1 atm, −33.33 °C) |
Boiling point (°C) |
−253 |
- |
101 |
−253 |
−33.33 |
Gravimetric hydrogen density (wt%) |
100 |
7.10 |
6.16 |
100 |
17.8 |
Volumetric hydrogen density (kg-H2/m3) |
42.2 |
|
47.1 |
70.9 |
120.3 |
Hydrogen release temp. (°C) |
- |
250 |
200–400 |
−253 |
350–900 |
Regeneration temp. (°C) |
- |
- |
100–200 |
- |
400–600 |
Enthalpy change to release hydrogen (kJ/mol-H2) |
- |
118 |
67.5 |
0.899 |
30.6 |
Compression is the conventional and easiest way to store hydrogen. The hydrogen density stored in its compressed form depends strongly on the storage pressure. Typically, at pressure of 10 MPa, the volumetric density of the storage hydrogen is 7.8 kg-H
2/m
3 (temperature of 20 °C). It increases to 39 kg-H
2/m
3 when the pressure is increased to approximately 69 MPa. Compressed hydrogen is adopted in many applications, including vehicles, hydrogen refueling stations, and other industrial purposes. To achieve a high density, advanced materials for vessels are required, such as carbon fiber and glass fiber-reinforced plastics. However, due to manufacturing limitations, the vessel size is also limited. In addition, because of its high pressure, the permeation of hydrogen gas (permeated hydrogen gas amount) to the vessel wall becomes larger [
30] leading to higher risk of accelerated embrittlement.
Hydrides for hydrogen storage include metal, complex, chemical, and interstitial metal hydrides. Metal hydrides are intermetallic compounds formed through a combination of stable hydride-forming elements and unstable-hydride-forming elements. Common metal hydrides include MgH
2, AlH
2, LaNi
5, and Mn
2Zn [
31]. Metal hydrides have the benefits of absorption and desorption at constant pressure, moderate temperature operation, and stability and safety during storage (possibility of long-term storage) [
32]. However, metal hydrides also face several challenges, including limited hydrogen storage, limited reversibility, packing limitation, thermal management, and heat demand during desorption to release hydrogen [
33]. Furthermore, complex hydrides are generally defined as compounds with the general formula M(XH
x)
y, in which M and X represent metal cations and metal or non-metal elements that have covalent or iono-covalent bonding with hydrogen. Complex hydrides include alanates (e.g., LiAlH
4 (10.4 wt%) and Mg(AlH
4)
2 (9.7 wt%)), amide–hydride composites (e.g., LiNH
2-2LiH (11.5 wt%)), metal B-based complex hydrides (e.g., LiBH
4(NH
3BH
3) (18.9 wt%), Mn(BH
4)
2·6NH
3 (14.0 wt%)), and metalorganic hydrides [
34]. Additionally, chemical hydrides are a promising option. Chemical hydrides are lighter than metal hydrides and have higher hydrogen densities. LiH (25.2 wt%), LiAlH (21.1 wt%), NaBH (21.3 wt%), and NH
3BH
3 (19.6 wt%) are promising chemical hydrides [
35]. Although these complex and chemical hydrides have high hydrogen density, they continue to face several problems, including low reversibility, thermodynamic limitations during dehydrogenation, slow kinetics during hydrogenation and dehydrogenation, and potential evolution of another product [
36].
Hydrogen can also be stored via adsorption, in which hydrogen molecules are physically bonded through van der Waals bonding with a material with a large specific surface area. However, as van der Waals bonding is relatively weak (3 kJ/mol-H
2–10 kJ/mol-H
2), gaseous hydrogen must be charged at relatively high pressures and low temperatures [
37] to achieve a relatively high hydrogen storage density. The pressure during hydrogen charging is 1–10 MPa (depending on the adsorbent materials and application), while liquid nitrogen is generally adopted as the cooling medium [
38]. Several adsorbents have been developed, including zeolites [
39], metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [
40], porous carbon materials [
41], and porous polymeric materials [
37]. Low adsorbent density, the requirement for additives to enhance heat conductivity, low volumetric hydrogen density [
42], and requirement for heat management are challenges faced by hydrogen adsorption. The adsorption is exothermic; therefore, heat removal is required to facilitate a sufficient level of adsorption [
37].
LOHC is a liquid that can store and release hydrogen reversibly through hydrogenation and dehydrogenation processes, respectively. The hydrogen density of LOHCs was in the range of 5–7 wt%. Promising LOHCs included toluene (C
7H
7)/methyl cyclohexane (C
7H
14), benzene (C
6H
6)/cyclohexane (C
6H
12), naphthalene (C
10H
8)/decalin (C
10H
18), biphenyl (C
12H
10)/bicyclohexyl (C
12H
22), and dibenzyltoluene (H0-DBT)/perhydrodibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT) with hydrogen storage densities of 6.2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.23, and 6.2%, respectively [
43,
44,
45]. LOHCs are essentially liquid under atmospheric conditions (20 °C and 1 atm); therefore, their handling, storage, and transportation are highly convenient. In addition, it is stable, safe, and compatible with the existing fuel infrastructure [
44]. However, LOHCs have disadvantages, such as low hydrogen density, the large amount of energy required during dehydrogenation, and the need for purification after dehydrogenation [
46].
Hydrogen can also be physically stored in liquid conditions at a temperature of −253 °C. This liquefaction leads to high gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen densities of 100 wt% and 70.9 kg-H
2/m
3, respectively, which are higher than those of compressed hydrogen, hydrides, and adsorption-based hydrogen storage. Furthermore, the liquefaction of hydrogen leads to several possibilities of storage, including liquid hydrogen (at normal pressure), cryo-compression (at elevated pressure), and slush (suspension with solid) hydrogen. Hydrogen becomes supercritical at temperatures and pressures higher than −240 °C and 1.3 MPa, respectively. Cryo-compressed storage refers to a combination of cryogenic liquid and compressed storage [
47]. This combination leads to a higher hydrogen storage density than liquid hydrogen, no change in phase, reduction in evaporation, increase in pressure buildup time, and reduction of boil-off losses [
48,
49]. However, the heat transferred from the surroundings results in evaporation, and the pressure inside the vessel increases accordingly. When the pressure limit was reached, the boil-off valve opened. Cryo-compressed hydrogen has several challenges, such as tank design, material, and expensive refueling infrastructure.
Slush hydrogen is defined as a cryogenic suspension of combined sub-cooled liquid and solid hydrogen at a triple point (−259.3 °C, 7.042 kPa) [
50], and it has a higher gravimetric density (approximately 15–20% higher) than liquid hydrogen [
51]. When the hydrogen slush contains 50% mass fraction of hydrogen solid, the gravimetric density and heat capacity are increased by 15.5 and 18.3%, respectively, compared to the liquid hydrogen at its boiling temperature. It has a higher density and heat capacity compared to liquid hydrogen, and is mainly adopted in aerospace rockets as a fuel [
52]. Moreover, slush hydrogen can be achieved through any repeated freeze–thaw process, in which liquid hydrogen is brought near its boiling point and the pressure is reduced. This results in vaporization of liquid hydrogen, removing the latent heat, and decreasing its temperature [
53]. When the liquid hydrogen is subsequently cooled down and its triple point is reached, solid hydrogen is formed on the surface of the vaporizing liquid. As the vacuuming is stopped, the pressure increases, leading to the melting of the formed solid hydrogen before it sinks and is agitated in liquid hydrogen. This process is repeated.
Storing hydrogen in the form of organic fuels, including methane and methanol, is considered non-carbon-free, as these materials involve carbon in their molecules. Among reformed organic fuels, ammonia is also considered promising for storing hydrogen due to its high hydrogen density (17.8 wt%), availability of infrastructure, wide possibility for utilization (with and without decomposition), and good storability (liquefaction at pressure of 0.8 MPa and temperature of 20 °C) [
26,
54]. However, ammonia faces several challenges, including high energy demand during its synthesis, narrow flammability range (15.15–27.35% and 15.95–26.55% in dry and 100% relative humidity of air, respectively), relatively higher apparent toxicity (approximately three orders of magnitude higher than methanol), and its potential to generate NO
x during its combustion at high temperatures [
52]. In addition, ammonia decomposition to release hydrogen requires a large amount of energy of 30.6 kJ/mol-H
2.
Large-scale hydrogen storage demands a high density of hydrogen storage. Liquid hydrogen and ammonia are considered promising storage methods, considering their hydrogen storage density and utilization. According to Wijayanta et al. [
26], liquid hydrogen is the most economically competitive when high-purity hydrogen is required during utilization. In addition, liquid hydrogen remains highly competitive compared to ammonia in many carbon-neutral applications. Liquid hydrogen is predicted to be applicable for advanced applications demanding high gravimetric energy density, such as maritime and aviation.