Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Oncology
Contributor:
Kamila Pawlicka

Nonsense-mediated messenger RNA (mRNA) decay (NMD) is a surveillance pathway used by cells to control the quality mRNAs and to fine-tune transcript abundance. NMD plays an important role in cell cycle regulation, cell viability, DNA damage response, while also serving as a barrier to virus infection. Disturbance of this control mechanism caused by genetic mutations or dys-regulation of the NMD pathway can lead to pathologies, including neurological disorders, immune diseases and cancers. The role of NMD in cancer development is complex, acting as both a promoter and a barrier to tumour progression. Cancer cells can exploit NMD for the downregulation of key tumour suppressor genes, or tumours adjust NMD activity to adapt to an aggressive immune microenvironment.

  • Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay
  • Premature termination codon
  • Cancer
  • Neoantigens
  • NMD inhibition

1. The Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay (NMD) Pathway and Machinery

The precise regulation of genetic information, as it is passed from gene to transcript to protein, is crucial for the survival of cells and organisms. From a single gene, multiple mature messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts arise through alternative pre-mRNA, resulting in mature species with differences in both the coding and non-coding regions [1]. Even beyond the end-points of mRNA transcription, the quality and quantity of mRNAs in cells is tightly controlled through various pathways [2]. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a critical cellular surveillance mechanism that recognizes and eliminates aberrant RNAs containing premature termination codons (PTC) or abnormally long 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). NMD was first found to affect one-third of the mutated mRNAs [2]. Transcripts with destabilizing PTC in their coding region are products of endogenous genes with nonsense or frameshift mutations, pseudogenes [3], or from alternative splicing events leading to intron retention or inclusion of PTC-containing exons [4]. To avoid producing C-terminally truncated proteins that can have deleterious effects for the organism, those transcripts harbouring PTC are recognized and subsequently degraded [5][6].
In mammalian cells, the discrimination of PTC-containing transcripts depends on the position of PTC in mRNA. Transcripts containing PTC at least 50–55 nucleotides upstream of the last exon-exon junction are recognized as “premature” and degraded through NMD. As a caveat, this definition changes across the species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PTC is defined independently of exon boundaries [5]. In another variation, the presence of introns is not necessary to define PTCs in Drosophila or in Caenorhabditis elegans, which shows a mechanistic diversity in the initiation of the NMD pathway [5].
NMD is a cytoplasmic and translation-dependent process. During pre-mRNA splicing, a multi-subunit protein complex, spanning ∼20–24 nucleotides, is deposited upstream of the exon-exon junction; the exon junction complex (EJC). Associated to mRNA, EJCs are transported into the cytoplasm, where the force of the ribosome, as it translates the transcript, is sufficient to remove the EJCs. Transcriptome-wide analysis and biological studies showed that EJCs are not loaded equally across all exon junctions of a transcript [7]. During translation of a normal transcript, the stop codon in the last exon ensures that no EJCs remain on the mRNA upon translation termination. The position of the ribosome at the end of the transcript is also important for translation termination, where interactions to proteins bound to the mRNA poly(A) tail and release factors are required. A stalled ribosome at a PTC leaves remaining downstream EJCs [2] and a distance to the 3′-end and poly(A) tail may be too large to facilitate termination. The resulting delayed release of the ribosome from the transcript affords the time needed to assemble NMD-related proteins and recruit other cofactors [8].

1.1. The NMD Machinery

The NMD pathway was first elucidated using unbiased genetic screens from Caenorhabditis elegans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [9][10]. Seven genes were identified in nematodes, termed SMG1–7 (suppressor with morphological effect on genitalia proteins 1–7). Mutations to SMG were non-lethal, indicating that NMD is not essential in nematodes [9]. Three orthologous genes to SMG2, SMG3 and SMG4, UPF1–3 (up-frameshift 1–3), were identified in S. cerevisiae [10]. Homology searches continued to identify orthologous genes in other species, including Arabidopsis, Drosophila and mammals [11].
In humans, NMD members include the hUPFs—human up-frameshift (UPF) proteins (UPF1, UPF2, UPF3a and UPF3b), the suppressors with morphological effects on genitalia proteins (SMG1, SMG5, SMG6, SMG7, SMG8 and SMG9), and the exon junction complex (EIF4A3, MAGOH, RBM8A and Barentsz (BTZ)) (Figure 1a) [2][12][13][14]. The EJC complex recruits the evolutionarily conserved UPF proteins and plays an essential role in NMD [15]. During the pioneer round of translation, some EJC components are displaced by the ribosome, and this positional information by EJC is preserved until the mRNA is translated [15][16]. In the presence of a PTC, translation pauses upstream of an EJC and the eukaryotic release factors (eRF) physically bind and recruit UPF1 (the RNA helicase) [17][18][19]. The eRFs recognize the stop codon, and when the mRNA stop codon enters the ribosomal A site, the termination of the protein synthesis occurs. The single eukaryotic class-I RF eRF1 recognizes all three (UAG, UGA, UAA) stop codons [20].
Cancers 12 00765 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of domains and motifs of the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) factors. (a) The NMD complex UPF: up-frameshift; SMG: suppressor of morphogenetic effect on genitalia; DHX34: DEAH box polypeptide 34; DCPC: the decapping complex; EJC: exon junction complex; CCR4-NOT: carbon catabolite repressor protein 4 (CCR4)–NOT deadenylase complex [21]. (b) For the UPF and SMG proteins: CH: cysteine-histidine rich domain; Stalk: RecA1 domain by two long ‘stalk’ helices; RecA1 and RecA2: RecA-like domains; 1B and 1C: subdomains within the helicase core; SQ: serine-glutamine rich domain; RRM: RNA recognition motif; EBM: exon junction binding motif; MIF4G: middle of 4G-like domains; UBD: UPF1-binding domain; PIN: PilT N-terminus domain; PC: C-terminal proline-rich region; HEAT: Huntingtin, elongation factor 3 (EF3), protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), yeast kinase TOR1 domain; FAT: focal adhesion kinase domain; FRB: FKBP12-rapamycin-binding; PIKK: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase domain; FATC: C-terminal FAT domain; G-fold-like: domains involved in dimerization between SMG8-SMG9 [21][22][23].
Initiation of the NMD pathway leads to remodelling of the surveillance complex (SURF), which includes the UPF1, SMG1, eRF1 and eRF3 proteins. UPF3b attaches to the EJC and anchors UPF2. The SURF complex binds with the UPF2, UPF3b and an EJC downstream of the PTC, forming the decay-inducing complex (DECID) [24]. Along with the UPF proteins the SURF complex promotes the phosphorylation of UPF1 by SMG1. In contrast, for the dephosphorylation of UPF1 a multiprotein complex composed of SMG5, SMG6, SMG7 and protein phosphatase 2A is required [25]. Allowing for the fine-tuning of the NMD activity, the UPF3a protein inhibits NMD, and this activity is regulated by the UPF3b protein [26].
The main component of the NMD machinery is the UPF1/SMG2 protein, an ATP-dependent RNA helicase, which undergoes cycles of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation that are essential for NMD progression. The UPF1 protein is involved in the translation termination complex, when an EJC lies downstream of a termination event. UPF1 undergoes a large conformational change upon binding with UPF2 protein, which activates its RNA-helicase activity [27][28][29]. Once the RNA-helicase is active, the RNA is exposed for degradation. The DEAH box polypeptide 34 (DHX34; Figure 1a), an RNA helicase of the DEAH box family, associates with several components of the NMD complex in cell lysates, and preferentially binds with the hypophosphorylated UPF1 [30][31][32]. It is proposed that DHX34 is involved in the activation of UPF1 phosphorylation, and mediates a change in interaction patterns within the NMD, which propagates NMD activation [31][32][33].
There are many pathways that lead to degradation of NMD-targeted RNAs. Studies show that in yeast, PTC-containing transcripts are degraded predominantly through deadenylation-independent process involving decapping by the Dcp1p/Dcp2p enzyme and 5′–3′ exonucleotic digestion by Xrn1p [6][29]. In human cells, those transcripts are degraded through multiple mechanisms, such as endonucleolytic cleavage [30], exosome mediated 3′–5′ decay [33] or deadenylation-dependent decapping [29]. Lykke-Andersen et al. performed a transcriptome-wide identification of NMD substrates and their 5′–3′ decay intermediates to establish that SMG6-catalyzed endonucleolysis widely initiates the degradation of human nonsense RNAs, whereas decapping is used to a lesser extent [21].

1.2. Structural Insights of NMD Components at a Glance

The UPF1 protein has a conserved cysteine-histidine-rich domain (CH-domain), followed by two RecA-like domains (RecA1 and RecA2; helicase region), and a SQ (serine-glutamine) domain (Figure 1b) [23][34]. From the structural analysis it is known that binding of UPF2/UPF3 protein to the CH-domain of UPF1 activates UPF1 ATPase and the helicase activities [35] (Figure 2). The UPF2 structure consists of four core regions, three domains are the middle portion of eukaryotic initiation factor 4-gamma (MIF4G-1, 2 and 3) domains and a C-terminal domain. This C-terminal domain of the UPF2 protein plays an important functional role, as it binds to the UPF1 CH-domain, enhancing its helicase activity [34]. Particularly, the MIF4G-3 domain interacts with the RRM (RNA recognition motif) domain of the UPF3b protein (Figure 1b) [36], as well as the SMG1 protein interacts with the MIF4G-3 domain at the same time as UPF3b, but in a non-competitive way [37]. Both UPF3a and UPF3b proteins do not show direct binding to the RNA, despite having a RNP domain (ribonucleoprotein or RRM) at the N-terminus (Figure 1b) [38].
Cancers 12 00765 g002 550
Figure 2. The protein-protein and protein-RNA binding interface for the NMD components, from the Protein Data Bank database (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb) [21][22][23][34][36][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. (a) NMD pathway schematic representations, and protein-protein interactions form the complex: UPF1-UPF2 (PDB: 2wjv) [34], UPF2-UPF3b (PDB: 1uw4) [36], SMG5-SMG7 (PDB: 3zhe) [41][48], SMG8-SMG9 (PDB: 5nkk) [42], SMG1–SMG8–SMG9 (PDB: 6syt) [43]. (b) The exon junction complex; Mago-Y14-eIF4AIII-Barentsz-UPF3b (PDB: 2xb2) [44] (Table 1). The H-bond analysis was performed using BIOVIA Discovery Studio Visualizer program [Dassault Systemes, BIOVIA Corp., San Diego, CA, USA].
Table 1. The crystal structures available for the protein-protein binding interface available for different NMD components, from the Protein Data Bank database (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb) [47]. UPF: up-frameshift; SMG: suppressor of morphogenetic effect on genitalia.
Protein Interacting Partners PDB ID. Resolution Method References
UPF1-UPF2 2wjv 2.85 Å X-Ray diffraction [34]
UPF2-UPF3b 1uw4 1.95 Å X-Ray diffraction [36]
SMG5-SMG7 3zhe 3 Å X-Ray diffraction [48]
SMG8-SMG9 5nkk 2.64 Å X-Ray diffraction [42]
SMG1–SMG8–SMG9 6syt 3.45 Å Electron microscopy [43]
Mago-Y14-eIF4AIII-Barentsz-UPF3b 2xb2 3.4 Å X-Ray diffraction [44]
The UPF1 protein is phosphorylated by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase related kinase (SMG1) [49]. SMG1 further associates with two cofactors, SMG8 and 9, and eukaryotic release factors eRF1 and 3a [24]. As a result the phosphorylation of UPF1 recruits SMG5/6/7 proteins, and these recruited components share a phosphoserine-binding domain [50]. The functional dependency between phosphorylation or dephosphorylation cycle and the ATPase or the helicase activities of the UPF1 protein, is an interesting area that needs investigation. The interactions between SMG5-SMG7 results in a stable heterodimer complex [51]. Composing of two EJC-binding motifs (EBMs) the SMG6 protein harbours an endonuclease activity that cleaves the PTC-mRNA (Figure 1b) [52]. Identifying the structural and the functional relationship between UPF1, SMG5, SMG6, SMG7 and their interacting proteins would be an interesting area to investigate [53].

1.3. NMD Target Selection, more than just Coding Transcripts

Despite an increased understanding of the NMD process, questions remain around the rules governing the NMD target selection. Varying between the organism or cell type, ~5–20% of the transcripts can be subjected to NMD and these targets extend beyond the classical understanding of this machinery. Beyond mRNA with PTC in coding regions, a number of features can target different RNA-species for degradation by NMD. Additional targets can be classified into three main categories: (1) transcripts with destabilizing PTC arising in pseudogenes [5], or from alternative splicing events leading to the intron retention or inclusion of PTC-containing exons [4]. (2) Transcripts with limited or no clear coding potential, such as small RNAs derived from intragenic regions [54], long non-coding RNAs [21] and mRNAs of inactivated transposons [5]. (3) Transcripts with upstream open reading frames, or with abnormally long 3′UTRs, or wild-type mRNAs with no atypical features [5]. It has been demonstrated that the NMD process can occur even without the presence of EJC bound to the mRNA. In this pathway, UPF1 binds to the 3′ UTRs of the transcript and interacts with exon–exon junction components found in the cytoplasm or EJC stably associated with 3′ UTRs. The mechanism of this process is still not fully understood.
Lykke-Andersen et al. performed a transcriptome-wide identification of NMD substrates in HEK293 cell line and found that genes hosting small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) were significantly enriched among NMD substrates. The researchers hypothesized that snoRNA host genes need to be highly transcribed to regulate the high demand for snoRNA production and that the expression of individual snoRNAs and their cognate spliced RNA can be uncoupled through alternative splicing and NMD [55].
Studies of long non-coding RNAs indicate that many contain long regions located downstream of the stop codon that are unprotected by ribosomes. Considering that a long 3′ UTR triggers NMD, translation termination upstream of these ribosome-free regions gives a mechanistic explanation for the recognition and elimination of non-coding RNAs by the NMD pathway [56].

2. NMD as a Crucial Regulator of the Transcriptome

NMD plays a role in the natural maintenance and regulation of the abundance of a large number of cellular RNAs. The pathway targets ~10% of unmutated mammalian mRNAs acting as a regulator of cellular adaptation to environmental changes, differentiation and cell survival [57]. For example, NMD plays known roles in the homeostasis of the cell, in embryonic development, in cellular response to stress and in regulating the immune response. As a consequence, the NMD response must be under a strict control in order to avoid undesirable alterations to the gene expression program of cells and tissues.

2.1. NMD in the Maintenance and Homeostasis of the Cell

Through evolution, some organisms have become dependent on the NMD pathway for the maintenance and homeostasis of normal cellular transcripts. This was not the case for nematodes or yeast where mutations in the main NMD components lead to discrete phenotypes [8][9]. However in humans, RNAi-based knockdowns on NMD genes showed that this pathway plays a crucial role in cell cycle regulation [58], cell viability [59] and the response to amino acid starvation [60]. Furthermore, NMD components have NMD-independent functions, such as the DNA damage response [61], maintenance of the telomere integrity [58], regulation of calcium metabolism [1], viral infection, replication [62] and tumourigenesis.
NMD also affects transcripts encoding splicing regulators, such as serine-arginine (SR) proteins. SR proteins interact with exonic enhancers stimulating exon inclusion. These factors were shown to autoregulate their own expression by creating a negative-feedback loop. For example, abnormally high expression of SC35 induces alternative splicing of its mRNA to an isoform harbouring a premature termination codon, which then gets degraded by NMD. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay acts as a biological switch that removes alternatively spliced mRNAs when the protein product is not needed. Considering that one-third of all splice variants produced by human genes harbour PTC, the NMD process also has function in regulation of “alternative splicing transcriptome” [63].

2.2. NMD Factors are Essential in Embryonic Development

The role of the NMD pathway during embryogenesis and during neuronal development has recently been reviewed [64]. Lou et al. studied a human embryonic stem cell line (ESC) and found that NMD factors are highly expressed in pluripotent stem cells, showing that NMD aids pluripotency in human ESCs [65]. In mammalian cells, disruption in UPF1 [66], UPF2 [67] and SMG6 [68] results in embryonic lethality in mice. Additionally, it has been proven that SMG1 is crucial for embryogenesis and that it influences the regulation of target genes via alternative splicing coupled to NMD. The study demonstrated a vital SMG1 function in early mouse development and linked the loss of this NMD component to the widespread changes in the mammalian transcriptome [69].
It has been discovered that disruptions in NMD components during development can result in male infertility. Downregulation of UPF2 gene at the early stages of spermatogenesis leads to loss of NMD and disappearance of the vast majority of spermatogenic cells. Interestingly, when UPF2 gets disrupted during postmeiotic stages, there is a decrease in NMD activated by long 3΄ UTR, but EJC-associated NMD is not disrupted [70].

2.3. Cellular Responses to Stress through NMD Regulation

The NMD pathway takes part in many crucial physiological processes, such as the response to stress, regulation of the immune system and viral replication. In the context of stress, NMD is incorporated among several strategies that are designed to counter the stress and restore homeostasis, or alternatively to divert cell-fate towards apoptosis. Stress mitigation can involve the repression of NMD as seen for stresses including nutrient deprivation, hypoxia or infection [15][63]. Inhibition of NMD is partially mediated by phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2, which stops the translation process and is a common step in several stress response schemes [71]. Downregulation of NMD pathway activity allows for the accumulation of NMD-targeted transcripts, including stress-response-factors and this increases cell survival [71].
NMD also acts as a regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is activated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. ER-stress is an imbalance between protein folding demand and the folding capacity of ER that results in the increased amount of unfolded proteins. While a physiologically beneficial pathway, the UPR requires tight regulation to avoid deleterious consequences. A persistent activation of the UPR is a cause of a wide variety of human diseases, therefore the unfolded protein response pathway must undergo a strict regulation. In a physiological state, NMD protects cells from the overactivation of UPR. Under stress conditions, NMD inhibition triggers UPR response through the upregulation of UPR sensors such as IRE1. However, as a consequence of inhibition, an accumulation of truncated misfolded proteins in the ER, leads to a cellular stress signal. NMD re-activation then helps end the stress response and leads to homeostasis [63].

2.4. NMD as a Regulator of the Immune Response and Viral Replication

The NMD pathway also plays an important role in the regulation of the immune system [72]. Signalling molecules (cytokines) that modulate the inflammation in response to infection are upregulated. The binding of cytokines to their receptors at the cell surface initiates an immune response cascade. It has been observed that UPF1, along with the RNA-binding protein, Regnase-1, degrades cytokine mRNAs at the first stages of the inflammation response. Regnase-1 binds to mRNAs and acts with UPF1 to downregulate these transcripts. On the other hand, RNA-binding protein Roquin functions in UPF1-independent manner to regulate the late phase of inflammation [72].
It has been shown that the NMD pathway controls the stability of transcripts encoding cytokine receptors; thus, influencing the inflammation response. mRNA of human CCR5 cytokine receptor harbors a programmed −1 ribosomal frameshift (−1PRF) signal, which directs the translating ribosome to a PTC, leading to mRNA downregulation [73].
Along with its role in immune response regulation, NMD also serves as a natural barrier to virus replication. Research conducted by Balistreri et al. show that downregulation of UPF1, SMG5 and SMG7 increases the level of viral protein and leads to higher viral infection. This concludes that NMD function is important for the antiviral response, providing a first line of cell defence before virus sensing and induction of other effectors [62][74].
Viruses have also evolved mechanisms to escape NMD-mediated degradation. One way to escape the decay pathway is through integrating a stability element in 3′ UTR that may prevent UPF1 function [75]. On the other hand, the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) virus uses Tax and Rex proteins to inhibit NMD by interaction with UPF1. Tax induces the accumulation of phosphorylated UPF1 in P-bodies which leads to enhanced stability of HTLV-1 mRNAs [76]. Waga et al. demonstrated that mRNA of coronaviruses (CoV) show multiple features that subject them to the NMD pathway, such as multiple open-reading frames (ORFs) with internal STOP codons that make up a long 3′ UTR. This led to the conclusion that CoVs evolved a strategy to inhibit the NMD pathway. The study identified that nucleocapsid protein inhibits NMD protecting viral RNAs from decay and leading to the efficient replication of the coronavirus. The process of NMD inhibition has been shown to promote accumulation of viral transcripts at the early stage of infection. Considering the role that NMD plays in regulation of stress and immune responses, inhibition of host NMD activity by nucleocapsid protein contributes to the pathogenicity of CoVs [77].
The mechanism of NMD restriction of viral replication by destabilizing viral transcripts containing internal stop codons or long 3′ UTRs has also been observed in plants. Similarly, plant viruses have also evolved ways to escape NMD, or modify host endogenous NMD activity [76]. This proves that the host NMD response reducing viral infection is an evolutionary conserved process, as well as the modulation of the NMD pathway counteracted by viruses.
A broad bioinformatic analysis on the RNASeq data from human cell lines with knockdowns of key NMD components UPF1, SMG6 or SMG7 demonstrated that the endoneucleolytic (SMG6-mediated) and exonucleolytic (SMG 5/7 mediated) decay routes are redundant, degrading mRNAs with introns in 3′ UTR regions [53]. It has been observed that NMD targets with 5′ upstream open reading frames (uORFs) and long 3′ UTRs tend to be categorized as transcription factors, stress response genes and oncogenes [21][78].
A better understanding of NMD regulation of the immune response might lead to new therapeutic strategies to fight immune-related diseases including autoimmunity and immune-evasion by cancer. For example, upregulating the NMD pathway can help to bring back the immune homeostasis during chronic inflammation [72].

3. Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and Genetic Disease

Of the 30 megabases that constitute human exonic sequences, 12% of single nucleotide mutations could generate transcripts with PTCs [79]. It is no surprise then that several such germline-variants in the population are implicated in diseases, including cystic fibrosis, ß-thalassemia and Duchenne muscular dystrophy [80]. In human genetic diseases, NMD can play two roles through the degradation of the PTC containing transcript. Beneficially, and in the context of feedback loops that increase dependence on the healthy transcript, NMD can limit the effects of a dominant negative mutation. However, if the PTC would have resulted in a partially functional but truncated protein, the destruction of this transcript by NMD could increase the severity of the disease [81].
ß-thalassemia is a disease caused by a defective ß-globin gene, often due to nonsense mutations in the gene. Heterozygotes with PTCs in the first or second exon are often asymptomatic owing to NMD downregulation of the mutated gene in red blood cells. NMD buffers the mutation with sufficient amounts of ß-globin by favouring the normal allele. On the other hand, PTCs in the final exon of ß-globin seem to escape the NMD pathway leading to high levels of the truncated transcript. The protein surveillance system in red blood cells fails to remove these truncated ß-chains, causing a clinical phenotype in the heterozygote called thalassemia intermedia [82][83]
In mammalian cells, UPF3b expression changes during brain development, and mutations in UPF3b and impaired NMD function inhibit proper neurite outgrowth [84][85]. It has been observed that patients carrying UPF3b mutations display facial dysmorphism, neurological abnormalities including schizophrenia or autism. Interestingly, the degree of mental retardation among those patients, depends on the amount of UPF3a protein produced in response to UPF3b deficiency [84].
In another example, overexpression of the double homeobox transcription factor DUX4, observed muscular dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), leads to activation of UPF1 proteolytic degradation and, therefore, NMD inhibition. DUX4 mRNA is also an NMD target, which means that through a double-negative feedback loop inhibition of NMD by DUX4 protein results in stable DUX4 transcript in FSHD muscle cells [86].
Stop-codon readthrough has been the main therapeutic approach pursued to treat NMD-implicated diseases. This strategy depends on small-molecule read-through agents [87] that induce the translation machinery to ignore the PTC and instead recode it as an amino acid. The resulting full-length protein is potentially functional, ameliorating the disease. Aminoglycosides were used to cause read-through of termination codons by the misincorporation of amino acids corresponding to near-cognate transfer RNA (tRNA) [88]. Gentamicin, another readthrough agent, has been utilized in clinical trials for cystic fibrosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. These trials showed the efficacy of this readthrough agent in restoring protein function. Unfortunately, the high doses of gentamicin required to achieve clinical utility in treatment may have adverse effects [89][90]. Ataluren has been pitched as an alternative with reported selectively in promoting PTC read-through over normal stop codons. However, the molecular mechanism of action has been challenged and its future use in clinics will largely depend on the patient outcomes of currently ongoing clinical trials [91].

4. A Dual Role for NMD in Cancer

There is growing evidence that the magnitude of NMD components are often inhibited in cancer cells. The role of NMD pathway in tumours is complex. NMD can both protect against disease and aggravate the disease phenotype, depending on the nature of the mutation triggering NMD and the type of the disease itself. This dual function of NMD has been documented by many studies focusing on NMD’s effects in human inherited genetic diseases [63]. Tumours exploit NMD to downregulate tumour-suppressors expression by selecting for mutations causing destruction of their transcripts and on the other hand, cancer cells adjust NMD activity to adapt to the tumour microenvironment. Understanding how certain tumours use the NMD pathway for their benefit may help in the development of new therapeutic interventions.

4.1. NMD as a Protective Agent in Cancer

In cancer, NMD can again act to buffer and hide aberrant mutations that are carried forward as the disease progresses. This can be beneficial, for example if the transcript encodes for tumour promoting dominant negative truncated forms of tumour-suppressor proteins. Through degradation of those PTC-carrying transcripts, the NMD pathway protects heterozygous germline carriers of these cancer mutants from developing cancer [92]. This phenomenon has been well documented for dominant negative heterozygous mutants of the tumour suppressor gene BRCA1, where germline mutations in this gene lead to familial cases of ovarian and breast cancer [93]. If expressed, the truncated BRCA1 has been shown to cause chemoresistance, decreased susceptibility to apoptosis, decrease in vivo tumour growth suppression, as well as inhibition of “protective” estrogen receptor transcriptional activity, suggesting that truncated BRCA1 proteins function by inhibiting the activity of wild-type BRCA1 [94].

4.2. NMD Implied in Cancer Aggressiveness and Progression

In contrast, targeted degradation of a fully- or partially- functional tumour suppressor proteins by the NMD pathway has a potential to increase the severity of cancer. As an example, the adhesion protein E-cadherin retains partial functionality when truncated at the C-terminus [95]. In the case of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), germline mutations in E-cadherin (CDH1) gene can often lead to PTC generation. Activation of NMD can reduce the level of the “protective” protein [96]. A bias is observed for patients harbouring CDH1 mutations at the extreme 3′ end of the gene that are able to escape from NMD. These patients have a reduced risk of developing HDGC compared to people harbouring NMD-activating CDH1 mutations [96][97].
Aberrations directly affecting the NMD machinery or the abundances of NMD components also occur in cancer, indicating that disruption of normal NMD functionality can sometimes be tolerated or promotes the disease. For example, somatic mutations in the UPF1 gene in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) tumours have been described [98]. These somatic point mutations were clustered in two regions of the UPF1 gene. Many seem to trigger alternative splicing of the UPF1 pre-mRNA, leading to the expression of truncated UPF1 proteins [91]. Similarly, UPF1 expression is shown to be lower in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) when compared to normal tissue. This characteristic leads to the decrease of NMD activity, which can lead to the upregulation of genes typically under NMD control. For example, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signalling components, which are vital to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). During EMT, epithelial cells lose their cell polarity and cell-cell adhesion [99].
It has been discovered that SMG1 expression negatively correlates with HPV (Human Papillomavirus) status in cancer cell lines and tumours. HPV is linked with a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), where patients with HPV-positive tumours show a better prognosis than HPV-negative HNSCCs, which may be explained by increased sensitivity of the HPV-positive HNSCCs to ionizing radiation (IR). Gubanova et al. showed that low SMG1 level results in elevated sensitivity to ionizing radiation due to increased induction of apoptosis in HPV-positive HNSCCs [100]. Depletion of SMG-1 in HPV-negative HNSCC cells resulted in increased radiation sensitivity, while SMG-1 overexpression protected HPV-positive tumour cells from irradiation.
Tumour evolution is also impacted by NMD, which can buffer lethal passenger mutations arising as the tumour explores sequence space. So, as tumours progress, they may become addicted to the NMD pathway through its capacity to conceal deleterious events. As sequence space is explored, tumour-suppressor genes can exhibit a high number of nonsense mutations triggering NMD and, therefore, lower the level of beneficial tumour suppressor proteins [101]. In contrast, oncogenes can harbour missense mutations that do not elicit NMD. In these cases, NMD-escape allows for elevated oncoprotein expression [101].

4.3. Role of NMD in the Tumour Microenvironment

NMD modulation has been observed in the tumour microenvironment to influence the fate of the tumour. Wang et al. identified ~750 mRNAs that were significantly upregulated in osteosarcoma cells in response to NMD inhibition. The scientists tested RNA-mediated depletion of UPF1 or UPF2, and exposed cells to hypoxia, or incubated with the ER stress inducer tunicamycin [70]. The data showed that among the upregulated transcripts, proteins involved in tumour-promoting pathways were overrepresented. Many of these NMD substrates have been shown to be upregulated in in vivo tumour models, as well as in Burkitt lymphoma, melanoma, breast and prostate cancers.
In prostate cancer cells, overexpression of UPF1 is shown to make cells no longer sensitive to NMD inhibition by cellular stress, do not grow as three-dimensional spheres or as xenografts in nude mice; however, their growth in standard tissue culture conditions is unaffected. The study suggests that NMD inhibition by the tumour microenvironment is an important mechanism of gene regulation crucial for tumourigenesis and for dictating the outcome of malignancy [70].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cancers12030765

References

  1. Nickless, A.; Bailis, J.M.; You, Z. Control of gene expression through the nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway. Cell Biosci. 2017, 7, 26.
  2. Popp, M.W.; Maquat, L.E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay and Cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2018, 48, 44–50.
  3. He, F.; Li, X.; Spatrick, P.; Casillo, R.; Dong, S.; Jacobson, A. Genome-Wide Analysis of mRNAs Regulated by the Nonsense-Mediated and 5′ to 3′ mRNA Decay Pathways in Yeast. Mol. Cell 2003, 12, 1439–1452.
  4. Celik, A.; Kervestin, S.; Jacobson, A. NMD: At the crossroads between translation termination and ribosome recycling. Biochimie 2015, 114, 2–9.
  5. Amrani, N.; Ganesan, R.; Kervestin, S.; Mangus, D.A.; Ghosh, S.; Jacobson, A. A faux 3′-UTR promotes aberrant termination and triggers nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Nature 2004, 7013, 112–118.
  6. Gatfield, D.; Unterholzner, L.; Ciccarelli, F.D.; Bork, P.; Izaurralde, E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in Drosophila: At the intersection of the yeast and mammalian pathways. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 3960–3970.
  7. Wang, Z.; Ballut, L.; Barbosa, I.; Le Hir, H. Exon Junction Complexes can have distinct functional flavours to regulate specific splicing events. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9509.
  8. Buhler, M.; Steiner, S.; Mohn, F.; Paillusson, A.; Muhlemann, O. EJC-independent degradation of nonsense immunoglobulin-μ mRNA depends on 3′ UTR length. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 462–464.
  9. Pulak, R.; Anderson, P. mRNA surveillance by the Caenorhabditis elegans smg genes. Genes Dev. 1993, 7, 1885–1897.
  10. Leeds, P.; Wood, J.M.; Lee, B.S.; Culbertson, M.R. Gene products that promote mRNA turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 2165–2177.
  11. Muhlemann, O.; Eberle, A.B.; Stalder, L.; Zamudio Orozco, R. Recognition and elimination of nonsense mRNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1779, 538–549.
  12. Boehm, V.; Gehring, N.H. Exon Junction Complexes: Supervising the Gene Expression Assembly Line. Trends Genet. 2016, 11, 724–735.
  13. Bono, F.; Ebert, J.; Lorentzen, E.; Conti, E. The Crystal Structure of the Exon Junction Complex Reveals How It Maintains a Stable Grip on mRNA. Cell 2006, 126, 713–725.
  14. Le Hir, H.; Izaurralde, E.; Maquat, L.E.; Moore, M.J. The spliceosome deposits multiple proteins 20–24 nucleotides upstream of mRNA exon-exon junctions. EMBO J. 2000, 24, 6860–6869.
  15. Gardner, L.B. Nonsense mediated RNA decay regulation by cellular stress; implications for tumorigenesis NIH Public Access. Mol. Cancer Res. 2010, 8, 295–308.
  16. Ishigaki, Y.; Li, X.; Serin, G.; Maquat, L.E. Evidence for a pioneer round of mRNA translation: mRNAs subject to nonsense-mediated decay in mammalian cells are bound by CBP80 and CBP20. Cell 2001, 106, 607–617.
  17. Dostie, J.; Dreyfuss, G. Translation is required to remove Y14 from mRNAs in the cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 2002, 13, 1060–1067.
  18. Lykke-Andersen, J.; Shu, M.D.; Steitz, J.A. Human Upf proteins target an mRNA for nonsense-mediated decay when bound downstream of a termination codon. Cell 2000, 103, 1121–1131.
  19. Gehring, N.H.; Neu-Yilik, G.; Schell, T.; Hentze, M.W.; Kulozik, A.E. Y14 and hUpf3b form an NMD-activating complex. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 939–949.
  20. Cheng, Z.; Saito, K.; Pisarev, A.V.; Wada, M.; Pisareva, V.P.; Pestova, T.V.; Gajda, M.; Round, A.; Kong, C.; Lim, M. Structural insights into eRF3 and stop codon recognition by eRF1. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 1106–1118.
  21. Lykke-Andersen, S.; Jensen, T.H. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: An intricate machinery that shapes transcriptomes. Nat. Publ. Group 2015, 16, 665–677.
  22. Karousis, E.D.; Nasif, S.; Mühlemann, O. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: Novel mechanistic insights and biological impact. RNA 2016, 7, 661–682.
  23. Kalathiya, U.; Padariya, M.; Pawlicka, K.; Verma, C.S.; Houston, D.; Hupp, T.R.; Alfaro, J.A. Insights into the Effects of Cancer Associated Mutations at the UPF2 and ATP-Binding Sites of NMD Master Regulator: UPF1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5644.
  24. Kashima, I.; Yamashita, A.; Izumi, N.; Kataoka, N.; Morishita, R.; Hoshino, S.; Ohno, M.; Dreyfuss, G.; Ohno, S. Binding of a novel SMG-1-Upf1-eRF1-eRF3 complex (SURF) to the exon junction complex triggers Upf1 phosphorylation and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 355–367.
  25. Schoenberg, D.R.; Maquat, L.E. Regulation of cytoplasmic mRNA decay. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 246–259.
  26. Chan, W.K.; Bhalla, A.D.; Le Hir, H.; Nguyen, L.S.; Huang, L.; Gécz, J.; Wilkinson, M.F. A UPF3-mediated regulatory switch that maintains RNA surveillance. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 747–753.
  27. Isken, O.; Kim, Y.K.; Hosoda, N.; Mayeur, G.L.; Hershey, J.W.B.; Maquat, L.E. Upf1 Phosphorylation Triggers Translational Repression during Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay. Cell 2008, 133, 314–327.
  28. Kurosaki, T.; Maquat, L.E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 461–467.
  29. Muhlrad, D.; Parker, R. Premature translational termination triggers mRNA decapping. Nature 1994, 370, 578–581.
  30. Huntzinger, E.; Kashima, I.; Fauser, M.; Saulière, J.; Izaurralde, E. SMG6 is the catalytic endonuclease that cleaves mRNAs containing nonsense codons in metazoan. RNA 2008, 14, 2609–2617.
  31. Melero, R.; Hug, N.; López-Perrote, A.; Yamashita, A.; Cáceres, J.F.; Llorca, O. The RNA helicase DHX34 functions as a scaffold for SMG1-mediated UPF1 phosphorylation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10585.
  32. Hug, N.; Caceres, J.F. The RNA helicase DHX34 activates NMD by promoting a transition from the surveillance to the decay-inducing complex. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 1845–1856.
  33. Lejeune, F.; Li, X.; Maquat, L.E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in mammalian cells involves decapping, deadenylating, and exonucleolytic activities. Mol. Cell 2003, 12, 675–687.
  34. Clerici, M.; Mourão, A.; Gutsche, I. Unusual bipartite mode of interaction between the nonsense-mediated decay factors, UPF1 and UPF2. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 2293–2306.
  35. Chakrabarti, S.; Jayachandran, U.; Bonneau, F.; Fiorini, F.; Basquin, C.; Domcke, S.; Le Hir, H.; Conti, E. Molecular mechanisms for the RNA-dependent ATPase activity of Upf1 and its regulation by Upf2. Mol. Cell 2011, 41, 693–703.
  36. Kadlec, J.; Izaurralde, E.; Cusack, S. The structural basis for the interaction between nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factors UPF2 and UPF3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 330–337.
  37. Clerici, M.; Deniaud, A.; Boehm, V.; Gehring, N.H.; Schaffitzel, C.; Cusack, S. Structural and functional analysis of the three MIF4G domains of nonsense-mediated decay factor UPF2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 42, 2673–2686.
  38. Gupta, P.; Li, Y. Upf proteins: Highly conserved factors involved in nonsense mRNA mediated decay. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 45, 39–55.
  39. Bhuvanagiri, M.; Lewis, J.; Putzker, K.; Becker, J.P.; Leicht, S.; Krijgsveld, J.; Batra, R.; Turnwald, B.; Jovanovic, B.; Hauer, C. 5-azacytidine inhibits nonsense-mediated decay in a MYC-dependent fashion. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014, 6, 1593–1609.
  40. Wang, D.; Wengrod, J.; Gardner, L.B. Overexpression of the c-myc oncogene inhibits nonsense-mediated RNA decay in B lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 40038–40043.
  41. Loh, B.; Jonas, S.; Izaurralde, E. The SMG5-SMG7 heterodimer directly recruits the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex to mRNAs containing nonsense codons via interaction with POP2. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 2125–2138.
  42. Li, L.; Lingaraju, M.; Basquin, C.; Basquin, J.; Conti, E. Structure of a SMG8–SMG9 complex identifies a G-domain heterodimer in the NMD effector proteins. RNA 2017, 23, 1028–1034.
  43. Gat, Y.; Schuller, J.M.; Lingaraju, M.; Weyher, E.; Bonneau, F.; Strauss, M.; Murray, P.J.; Conti, E. InsP6 binding to PIKK kinases revealed by the cryo-EM structure of an SMG1-SMG8-SMG9 complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019, 26, 1089–1093.
  44. Buchwald, G.; Ebert, J.; Basquin, C.; Sauliere, J.; Jayachandran, U.; Bono, F.; Conti, E. Insights into the Recruitment of the NMD Machinery from the Crystal Structure of a Core EJC-UPF3b Complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10050–10055.
  45. Frischmeyer, P.A.; Dietz, H.C. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in health and disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999, 8, 1893–1900.
  46. Jin, L.; Wang, W.; Fang, G. Targeting protein-protein interaction by small molecules. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2014, 54, 435–456.
  47. Rose, P.W.; Beran, B.; Bi, C.; Bluhm, W.F.; Dimitropoulos, D.; Goodsell, D.S.; Prlić, A.; Quesada, M.; Quinn, G.B.; Westbrook, J.D.; et al. The RCSB Protein Data Bank: Redesigned website and web services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 392–401.
  48. Jonas, S.; Weichenrieder, O.; Izaurralde, E. An unusual arrangement of two 14-3-3-like domains in the SMG5-SMG7 heterodimer is required for efficient nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 211–225.
  49. Page, M.F.; Carr, B.; Anders, K.R.; Grimson, A.; Anderson, P. SMG-2 Is a Phosphorylated Protein Required for mRNA Surveillance in Caenorhabditis elegans and Related to Upf1p of Yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 5943–5951.
  50. Fukuhara, N.; Ebert, J.; Unterholzner, L.; Lindner, D.; Izaurralde, E.; Conti, E. SMG7 is a 14-3-3-like adaptor in the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway. Mol. Cell 2015, 17, 537–547.
  51. Okada-Katsuhata, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Kutsuzawa, K.; Izumi, N.; Hirahara, F.; Ohno, S. N- and C-terminal Upf1 phosphorylations create binding platforms for SMG-6 and SMG-5:SMG-7 during NMD. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 1251–1266.
  52. Eberle, A.; Lykke-Andersen, S.; Mühlemann, O. SMG6 promotes endonucleolytic cleavage of nonsense mRNA in human cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 49–55.
  53. Colombo, M.; Karousis, E.D.; Bourquin, J.; Bruggmann, R.; Muhlemann, O. Transcriptome-wide identification of NMD-targeted human mRNAs reveals extensive redundancy between SMG6- and SMG7-mediated degradation pathways. RNA 2017, 23, 189–201.
  54. Smith, J.E.; Alvarez-Dominguez, J.R.; Kline, N.; Huynh, N.J.; Geisler, S.; Hu, W.; Baker, K.E. Translation of small open reading frames within unannotated RNA transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 1858–1866.
  55. Lykke-Andersen, S.; Chen, Y.; Ardal, B.R.; Lilje, B.; Waage, J.; Sandelin, A.; Jensen, T.H. Human nonsense-mediated RNA decay initiates widely by endonucleolysis and targets snoRNA host genes. Genes Dev. 2014, 28, 2498–2517.
  56. Smith, J.E.; Baker, K.E. Nonsense-mediated RNA decay--a switch and dial for regulating gene expression. Bioessays 2015, 37, 612–623.
  57. Hug, N.; Longman, D.; Caceres, J.F. Mechanism and regulation of the nonsense-mediated decay pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 1483–1495.
  58. Azzalin, C.M.; Lingner, J. The human RNA surveillance factor UPF1 is required for S phase progression and genome stability. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 433–439.
  59. Nelson, J.O.; Moore, K.A.; Chapin, A.; Hollien, J.; Metzstein, M.M. Degradation of Gadd45 mRNA by nonsense-mediated decay is essential for viability. Elife 2016, 5, e12876.
  60. Martin, L.; Gardner, L.B. Stress-induced inhibition of nonsense-mediated RNA decay regulates intracellular cystine transport and intracellular glutathione through regulation of the cystine/glutamate exchanger SLC7A11. Oncogene 2015, 34, 4211–4218.
  61. Gewandter, J.S.; Bambara, R.A.; O’Reilly, M.A. The RNA surveillance protein SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double-strand breaks but not exogenously oxidized mRNA. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2561–2567.
  62. Balistreri, G.; Horvath, P.; Schweingruber, C.; Zünd, D.; McInerney, G.; Merits, A.; Helenius, A. The host nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway restricts mammalian RNA virus replication. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 16, 403–411.
  63. Karam, R.; Wengrod, J.; Gardner, L.B.; Wilkinson, M.F. Regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: Implications for physiology and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2013, 1829, 624–633.
  64. Fatscher, T.; Boehm, V.; Gehring, N.H. Mechanism, factors, and physiological role of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 4523–4544.
  65. Lou, C.H.; Dumdie, J.; Goetz, A.; Shum, E.Y.; Brafman, D.; Liao, X.; Wilkinson, M.F. Nonsense-mediated RNA decay influences human embryonic stem cell fate. Stem Cell Rep. 2016, 6, 844–857.
  66. Medghalchi, S.M.; Frischmeyer, P.A.; Mendell, J.T.; Kelly, A.G.; Lawler, A.M.; Dietz, H.C. Rent1, a trans-effector of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, is essential for mammalian embryonic viability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 99–105.
  67. Weischenfeldt, J.; Waage, J.; Tian, G.; Zhao, J.; Damgaard, I.; Jakobsen, J.S. Mammalian tissues defective in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay display highly aberrant splicing patterns. Genome Biol. 2012, 13, R35.
  68. Li, T.; Shi, Y.; Wang, P.; Guachalla, L.M.; Sun, B.; Joerss, T.; Wang, Z. Smg6/Est1 licenses embryonic stem cell differentiation via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. EMBO J. 2015, 34, 1630–1647.
  69. Mcilwain, D.R.; Pan, Q.; Reilly, P.T.; Elia, A.J.; Mccracken, S.; Wakeham, A.C.; Mak, T.W. Smg1 is required for embryogenesis and regulates diverse genes via alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12186–12191.
  70. Wang, D.; Zavadil, J.; Martin, L.; Parisi, F.; Friedman, E.; Levy, D.; Gardner, L.B. Inhibition of Nonsense-Mediated RNA Decay by the Tumor Microenvironment Promotes Tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 3670–3680.
  71. Gardner, L.B. Hypoxic Inhibition of Nonsense-Mediated RNA Decay Regulates Gene Expression and the Integrated Stress Response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 3729–3741.
  72. Mino, T.; Murakawa, Y.; Fukao, A.; Vandenbon, A.; Wessels, H.H.; Ori, D.; Uehata, T.; Tartey, S.; Akira, S.; Suzuki, Y. Regnase-1 and Roquin regulate a common element in inflammatory mRNAs by spatiotemporally distinct mechanisms. Cell 2015, 161, 1058–1073.
  73. Belew, A.T.; Meskauskas, A.; Musalgaonkar, S.; Advani, V.M.; Sulima, S.O.; Kasprzak, W.K.; Shapiro, B.A.; Dinman, J.D. Ribosomal frameshifting in the CCR5 mRNA is regulated by miRNAs and the NMD pathway. Nature 2014, 512, 265–269.
  74. Quek, B.L.; Beemon, K. Retroviral strategy to stabilize viral RNA. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 18, 78–82.
  75. Mocquet, V.; Neusiedler, J.; Rende, F.; Cluet, D.; Robin, J.P.; Terme, J.M.; Duc Dodon, M.; Wittmann, J.; Morris, C.; Le Hir, H. The human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 tax protein inhibits nonsense-mediated mRNA decay by interacting with INT6/EIF3E and UPF1. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 7530–7543.
  76. Garcia, D.; Garcia, S.; Voinnet, O. Nonsense-mediated decay serves as a general viral restriction mechanism in plants. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 16, 391–402.
  77. Wada, M.; Lokugamage, K.G.; Nakagawa, K.; Narayanan, K.; Makino, S. Interplay between coronavirus, a cytoplasmic RNA virus, and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10157–10166.
  78. Goetz, A.E.; Wilkinson, M. Stress and the nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 3509–3531.
  79. Krawczak, M.; Ball, E.V.; Fenton, I.; Stenson, P.D.; Abeysinghe, S.; Thomas, N.; Cooper, D.N. Human Gene Mutation Database-A biomedical information and research resource. Hum. Mutat. 2000, 15, 45–51.
  80. Khajavi, M.; Inoue, K.; Lupski, J.R. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay modulates clinical outcome of genetic disease. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 14, 1074–1081.
  81. Miller, J.N.; Pearce, D.A. Nonsense-mediated decay in genetic disease: Friend or foe? Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2014, 762, 52–64.
  82. Hall, G.W.; Thein, S. Nonsense codon mutations in the terminal exon of the β-globin gene are not associated with a reduction in β-mRNA accumulation: A mechanism for the phenotype of dominant β-thalassemia. Blood 1994, 83, 2031–2037.
  83. Romão, L.; Inácio, A.; Santos, S.; Avila, M.; Faustino, P.; Pacheco, P.; Lavinha, J. Nonsense mutations in the human beta-globin gene lead to unexpected levels of cytoplasmic mRNA accumulation. Blood 2000, 96, 2895–2901.
  84. Alrahbeni, T.; Sartor, F.; Anderson, J.; Miedzybrodzka, Z.; McCaig, C.; Müller, B. Full UPF3B function is critical for neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells. Mol. Brain 2015, 8, 33.
  85. Jolly, L.A.; Homan, C.C.; Jacob, R.; Barry, S.; Gecz, J. The UPF3B gene, implicated in intellectual disability, autism, ADHD and childhood onset schizophrenia regulates neural progenitor cell behaviour and neuronal outgrowth. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 4673–4687.
  86. Feng, Q.; Snider, L.; Jagannathan, S.; Tawil, R.; van der Maarel, S.M.; Tapscott, S.J.; Bradley, R.K. A feedback loop between nonsense-mediated decay and the retrogene DUX4 in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. ELife 2015, 4, e04996.
  87. Baradaran-Heravi, A.; Balgi, A.D.; Zimmerman, C.; Choi, K.; Shidmoossavee, F.S.; Tan, J.S.; Bergeaud, C.; Krause, A.; Flibotte, S.; Shimizu, Y. Novel small molecules potentiate premature termination codon readthrough by aminoglycosides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6583–6598.
  88. Roy, B.; Leszyk, J.D.; Mangus, D.A.; Jacobson, A. Nonsense suppression by near-cognate tRNAs employs alternative base pairing at codon positions 1 and 3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3038–3043.
  89. Wilschanski, M.; Yahav, Y.; Yaacov, Y.; Blau, H.; Bentur, L.; Rivlin, J.; Kerem, E. Gentamicin-Induced Correction of CFTR Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and CFTR Stop Mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1433–1441.
  90. Malik, V.; Rodino-Klapac, L.R.; Viollet, L.; Wall, C.; King, W.; Al-Dahhak, R.; Mendell, J.R. Gentamicin-induced readthrough of stop codons in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 67, 771–780.
  91. Peltz, S.W.; Morsy, M.; Welch, E.M.; Jacobson, A. Ataluren as an Agent for Therapeutic Nonsense Suppression. Annu. Rev. Med. 2013, 64, 407–425.
  92. Holbrook, J.A.; Neu-Yilik, G.; Hentze, M.W.; Kulozik, A.E. Nonsense-mediated decay approaches the clinic. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 801–808.
  93. Perrin-Vidoz, L.; Sinilnikova, O.M.; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D.; Lenoir, G.M.; Mazoyer, S. The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway triggers degradation of most BRCA1 mRNAs bearing premature termination codons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 2805–2814.
  94. Fan, S.; Yuan, R.-Q.; Ma, Y.X.; Meng, Q.; Goldberg, I.D.; Rosen, E.M. Mutant BRCA1 genes antagonize phenotype of wild-type BRCA1. Oncogene 2001, 20, 8215–8235.
  95. Sasaki, C.Y.; Lin, H.; Morin, P.J.; Longo, D.L. Truncation of the Extracellular Region Abrogrates Cell Contact but Retains the Growth-suppressive Activity of E-cadherin. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 7057–7065.
  96. Karam, R.; Carvalho, J.; Bruno, I.; Graziadio, C.; Senz, J.; Huntsman, D.; Oliveira, C. The NMD mRNA surveillance pathway downregulates aberrant E-cadherin transcripts in gastric cancer cells and in CDH1 mutation carriers. Oncogene 2008, 27, 4255–4260.
  97. Kaurah, P.; MacMillan, A.; Boyd, N.; Senz, J.; De Luca, A.; Chun, N. Founder and recurrent CDH1 mutations in families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. JAMA 2007, 297, 2360–2372.
  98. Liu, C.; Karam, R.; Zhou, Y.; Su, F.; Ji, Y.; Li, G.; Lu, Y. The UPF1 RNA surveillance gene is commonly mutated in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 596–598.
  99. Cao, L.; Qi, L.; Zhang, L.; Song, W.; Yu, Y.; Xu, C.; Li, L.; Guo, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, C.; et al. Human nonsense-mediated RNA decay regulates EMT by targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2017, 403, 246–259.
  100. Gubanova, E.; Brown, B.; Ivanov, S.V.; Helleday, T.; Mills, G.B.; Yarbrough, W.G.; Issaeva, N. Downregulation of SMG-1 in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma due to promoter hypermethylation correlates with improved survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 1257–1267.
  101. Mort, M.; Ivanov, D.; Cooper, D.N.; Chuzhanova, N.A. A meta-analysis of nonsense mutations causing human genetic disease. Hum. Mutat. 2008, 29, 1037–1047.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback