Crosslinking of Electrospun Gelatin Nanofibers: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Polymer Science
Contributor:
Andrea Ehrmann

Electrospinning can be used to prepare nanofiber mats from diverse polymers, polymer blends, or polymers doped with other materials. Amongst this broad range of usable materials, biopolymers play an important role in biotechnological, biomedical, and other applications. Biopolymers like gelatin, however, need to be crosslinked for most applications.

  • nanofiber blends
  • water-solubility
  • polymer complex
  • polymer blend
  • crosslinker
  • genipin
  • aldehydes
  • UV-crosslinking
  • electron beam
  • photo initiator

1. Introduction

Gelatin is derived from collagen by partial hydrolysis, either by acid processing (type A) or by alkaline or lime processing (type B) [1]. Gelatin is often processed from waste, e.g., from fish skin and bones after filleting [2]. As a natural material, gelatin shows different physical and chemical properties, depending on its origin [3][4][5]. Values typically measured in comparative studies are, e.g., the molecular weight, amino acid composition, gel strength, viscosity, melting point, as well as breaking force, water vapor permeability, or water solubility.
Gelatin’s physical and chemical properties as well as the abundant availability make it interesting for diverse applications in food, cosmetics, and the pharmaceutical industry, but also as a coating of photographic films. Other important areas of application are biotechnology and biomedicine. Especially gelatin-based porous scaffolds are of high interest in tissue engineering [6]. However, here, a challenge occurs due to the water-solubility of gelatin, which necessitates crosslinking after producing the scaffolds. There are different physical methods, such as UV irradiation or dehydrothermal treatment [7][8], chemical methods such as exposure to glutaraldehyde in the form of vapor or liquid [9][10] or to ethylcarbodiimidehydrochlorine (EDC) combined with N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) [11][12], or enzymatic treatment by genipin or transglutaminases [13][14]. Generally, the crosslinking method influences the physical and chemical properties of the resulting scaffold [15][16][17].
This is especially important for nanofibrous scaffolds, as they are often produced by electrospinning. The structure of these ultrathin fibers is usually modified by the crosslinking process, in this way also modifying the porosity, mechanical properties, and suitability for cell growth.

2. Electrospun Gelatin Nanofibers—Production and Properties

Electrospinning can be used to produce nanofiber mats by a relatively simple technique. In brief, a polymer solution or melt is introduced into an electric field that is produced by a high voltage between two electrodes, where the polymer solution or melt is accelerated to the counter electrode and in this way stretched until ultrathin fibers are deposited on the substrate, which usually shields the counter electrode [18][19][20]. Often used techniques are needle-based electrospinning (Figure 1a) [21] and wire-based electrospinning (Figure 1b) [22], while there are diverse other technologies available in the broad range of needleless electrospinning.
Polymers 13 01973 g001 550
Figure 1. Examples of electrospinning techniques: (a) Needle-based electrospinning, from [21], originally published under a CC-BY license; (b) wire-based electrospinning, from [22], originally published under a CC-BY license.
Electrospinning gelatin is in principle possible from aqueous solutions. For example, Zhang et al. investigated the influence of the spinning temperature as well as of the solid content in the solution on the morphology of the gelatin nanofiber mat [23]. They dissolved 30–40% gelatin with a molecular weight of 25 kDa in distilled water of 40 °C, varied the temperature of the solution in the syringe during spinning between 30 and 50 °C, and found that the viscosity decreased with temperature and increased with solid content, while the conductivity increased with temperature and with concentration. The average fiber diameter slightly decreased with temperature and strongly increased with gelatin concentration. Crosslinking was performed with EDC/NHS in a ratio of 2.5:1, resulting in reduced weight loss, significantly reduced swelling, and clearly modified stress–strain curves, which also depended strongly on whether they were measured in the dry or in the wet state.

3. Physical Crosslinking

One of the possibilities to crosslink gelatin nanofibers is based on the use of high-energetic light, i.e., UV irradiation. In this approach, inter- and intramolecular photodimerization techniques are used to control the crosslinking density [24]. For example, Ko et al. firstly prepared trans-cinnamic acid modified gelatin, used it for electrospinning from HFP with a needle-based technique on a rotating collector, and crosslinked these gelatin nanofibers by UV irradiation at 254 nm for different durations, before the unreacted gelatin was rinsed with water [24]. They found higher UV absorbance with increasing amount of cinnamoyl groups, with no absorbance of natural gelatin at the investigated wavelength of 270 nm. The crosslinking density also increased with increasing UV irradiation duration up to 3 h, while longer times did not show further crosslinking effects. However, comparison with genipin crosslinked gelatin nanofibers showed higher cell proliferation of the latter.

4. Chemical Crosslinking

The most often used chemical crosslinking agents belong to the aldehydes. In many studies, glutaraldehyde is used to crosslink electrospun gelatin nanofibers, either as vapor or in fluid form [25][26][27][28][29]. On the one hand, GA is a very efficient crosslinking agent, as visible in Figure 2 [26]. On the other hand, glutaraldehyde is toxic, with highly problematic effects on the human health, such as chronic bronchitis and even possible genetic activity, reported in diverse studies [30][31][32]. Thus, different crosslinking chemicals are necessary, combining low-toxicity with efficient crosslinking.
Polymers 13 01973 g005 550
Figure 2. Crosslinked electrospun gelatin fibers: (a) before water-resistant test; immersed in 37 °C deionized water for (b) 2 days, (c) 4 days, and (d) 6 days (d). Reprinted from [26]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Another crosslinking approach for gelatin nanofiber mats is based on the aforementioned EDC/NHS. The idea behind this combination is that EDC promotes isopeptide bonds between the amino acid chains in proteins in an aqueous solution, while NHS subsequently stabilizes the EDC-fixed proteins [12][33].

5. Enzymatic Crosslinking

Enzymatic crosslinking of gelatin is most often performed by genipin [34][35][36] or microbial transglutaminase [37][38][39]. Both are not non-toxic, but they are briefly mentioned here as examples for enzymatic crosslinking. Genipin is a molecule extracted from the gardenia plant fruit, which crosslinks gelatin in a two-step process, firstly by building heterocyclic linking of genipin to an amine in gelatin, followed by a nucleophilic substitution of the ester group in genipin resulting in covalent crosslinks between the primary amine residues [35]. Microbial transglutaminase (MTG) is a transferase that is assumed to build covalent bonds between different polymer chains, resulting in a hydrogel network [39]. Other enzymes that have been used to crosslink biopolymers belong to the transferases, hydrolases, and oxidoreductases [39], and they have been scarcely investigated for their possible use with electrospun nanofiber mats.

6. Blending Gelatin with Other Polymers

As a last method to improve the mechanical strength and to reduce the water solubility of electrospun gelatin nanofiber mats, they can be blended with other polymers, in this way often retaining the positive properties of gelatin for tissue engineering in combination with the mechanical stability of the water-stable polymer.
One of the typical blend partners of gelatin is chitosan. Chitosan is derived from chitin by partial deacetylation, and it is, similar to gelatin, biocompatible, biodegradable, and antimicrobial [40]. Dhandayuthapani et al. prepared chitosan/gelatin blend nanofibers by electrospinning from TFA/dichloromethane solution and found significantly better tensile strength, in the range of normal human skin, for the blended nanofibers [41]. Similarly, Yin-Guibo et al. found improved mechanical properties for silk fibroin/gelatin blended electrospun nanofiber mats, as compared to both pure materials [42]. The solubility in water was not mentioned in these studies.

7. Biomedical Applications of Crosslinked Gelatin Nanofiber Mats

In addition to the aforementioned possible applications of crosslinked gelatin nanofibers mats for tissue engineering, cell growth, wound healing, and other biomedical applications, this section gives some more examples of these applications without the previous restriction to non-toxic crosslinking methods.
Jalaja et al. used crosslinking with dextran aldehyde to improve thermal and mechanical properties as well as the structural integrity in an aqueous solution [43]. The nanofiber mat was found to be non-cytotoxic for mouse subcutaneous fibroblasts L-929 and showed significantly higher cell proliferation as compared to glutaraldehyde crosslinked nanofiber mats.
Using GT vapor crosslinking, Gui et al. compared human mesenchymal stem cell growth on randomly oriented and highly aligned gelatin nanofiber mats and found more effective proliferation on the oriented fibers [44]. Padrao et al. also used GA to crosslink electrospun gelatin nanofiber mats and found no inhibition of MC-3T3-E1 cell adhesion and proliferation in randomly oriented and aligned gelatin nanofiber mats [45]. With genipin crosslinking of gelatin nanofiber mats, Gualandi found no cytotoxicity against human primary chondrocytes, but oppositely the promotion of chondrocyte viability and differentiation [46]. Chen et al. also found cell compatibility for mouse mesangial cells grown on GA-crosslinked gelatin nanofibers [29].
Luo et al. compared gelatin nanofiber mats crosslinked with glutaraldehyde, genipin, and EDC/NHS and found that they all supported adhesion, spreading, and proliferation of MC-3T3-E1 cells, with a lower cell viability after GA crosslinking, while similar values were found for genipin and EDC/NHS [47].
Ghassemi and Slaughter used DHT and EDC/NHS crosslinking on gelatin nanofiber mats and suggested EDC/NHS crosslinked electrospun gelatin nanofiber mats as scaffolds for cell-based assays [48].
Hivechi et al. used NIH/3T3 mouse fibroblasts to investigate the influence of adding cellulose nanocrystals to electrospun gelatin nanofibers [49]. They found a slightly increased biodegradability of the fibers crosslinked by GA vapor and no effect on the cytotoxicity, cell growth, and proliferation.
Using GA vapor crosslinking, Laha et al. used gelatin nanofiber mats for oral drug delivery with piperine as a model drug [25][50]. By modulating the pH value of the release medium and the crosslinking efficiency, they could tailor the piperine release rate.
Del Gaudio et al. also used genipin-crosslinked electrospun gelatin nanofiber mats to investigate loading with human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and long-term release of VEGF [51]. Human mesenchymal stromal cells growing on these nanofiber mats showed higher cell viability and endothelial differentiation when growing on these VEGF-loaded nanofiber mats, with the bioactive and pro-angiogenic potential kept for two weeks, showing that VEGF-loaded genipin-crosslinked gelatin nanofiber mats may be suitable for the stimulation of angiogenesis in tissue engineering.
Bactericidal wound dressing was produced by adding poly([2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride) (PMETAC) to the gelatin electrospinning solution and crosslinking the obtained nanofiber mats with GA vapor [52]. Inal and Mülazimoglu showed good cell attachment and proliferation and suggested using these antimicrobial, biocompatible nanofiber mats as wound dressing.
Especially for postoperative surgical wounds, Rath et al. suggested gelatin nanofiber mats loaded with cefazolin/zinc oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial wound dressings [53].
As these few examples show, in addition to those given in the previous sections, the main applications of crosslinked gelatin nanofiber mats in biomedicine are related to tissue engineering and cell growth, but also for wound healing with tailorable drug delivery.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/polym13121973

References

  1. Keenan, T.R. Gelatin. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001.
  2. Muyonga, J.H.; Cole, C.G.B.; Duodu, K.G. Extraction and physico-chemical characterisation of Nile perch (Lates niloticus) skin and bone gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2004, 18, 581–592.
  3. Gudmundsson, M. Rheological properties of fish gelatins. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 2172–2175.
  4. Sompie, M.; Surtiono, S.E.; Pontoh, J.H.W.; Lontaan, N.N. The effect of acetic acid concentration and extraction temperature on physical and chemical properties of pigskin gelatin. Proc. Food Sci. 2015, 3, 383–388.
  5. Gómez-Estaca, J.; Montero, P.; Fernández-Martín, F.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C. Physico-chemical and film-forming properties of bovine-hide and tuna-skin gelatin: A comparative study. J. Food Eng. 2009, 90, 480–486.
  6. Hoque, M.E.; Nuge, T.; Yeow, T.K.; Nordin, N.; Prasad, R.G.S.V. Gelatin based scaffolds for tissue engineering—A review. Polym. Res. J. 2015, 9, 15–32.
  7. Torres-Giner, S.; Gimeno-Alcañiz, J.V.; Ocio, M.J.; Lagaron, J.M. Comparative performance of electrospun collagen nanofibers cross-linked by means of different methods. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 218–223.
  8. Haugh, M.G.; Jaasma, M.J.; O’Brien, F.J. The effect of dehydrothermal treatment on the mechanical and structural properties of collagen-GAG scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 89, 363–369.
  9. Bigi, A.; Cojazzi, G.; Panzavolta, S.; Rubini, K.; Roveri, N. Mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 763–768.
  10. Lu, W.P.; Ma, M.; Xu, H.T.; Zhang, B.; Cao, X.F.; Guo, Y.C. Gelatin nanofibers prepared by spiral-electrospinning and cross-linked by vapor and liquid-phase glutaraldehyde. Mater. Lett. 2015, 140, 1–4.
  11. Kuijpers, A.J.; Engbers, G.H.M.; Krijgsveld, J.; Zaat, S.A.J.; Dankert, J.; Feijen, J. Cross-linking and characterisation of gelatin matrices for biomedical applications. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2000, 11, 225–243.
  12. Chang, J.-Y.; Lin, J.-H.; Yao, C.-H.; Chen, J.-H.; Lai, T.-Y.; Chen, Y.-S. In Vivo Evaluation of a Biodegradable EDC/NHS-Cross-Linked Gelatin Peripheral Nerve Guide Conduit Material. Macromol. Biosci. 2007, 7, 500–507.
  13. Bigi, A.; Cojazzi, G.; Panzavolta, S.; Roveri, N.; Rubini, K. Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 4827–4832.
  14. Yi, J.B.; Kim, Y.T.; Bae, H.J.; Whiteside, W.S.; Park, H.J. Influence of transglutaminase-induced cross-linking on properties of fish gelatin films. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, E376–E383.
  15. Skopinska-Wisniewska, J.; Tuszynska, M.; Olewnik-Kruszkowska, E. Comparative study of gelatin hydrogels modified by various cross-linking agents. Materials 2021, 14, 396.
  16. Sisson, K.; Zhang, C.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Chase, D.B.; Rabolt, J.F. Evaluation of cross-linking methods for electrospun gelatin on cell growth and viability. BioMacromolecules 2009, 10, 1675–1680.
  17. Coimbra, P.; Gil, M.H.; Figueiredo, M. Tailoring the properties of gelatin films for drug delivery applications: Influence of the chemical cross-linking method. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 70, 10–19.
  18. Bhardwaj, N.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347.
  19. Agarwal, S.; Wendorff, J.H.; Greiner, A. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer 2008, 49, 5603–5621.
  20. Cengiz, F.; Krucinska, I.; Gliscinska, E.; Chrzanowski, M.; Göktepe, F. Comparative analysis of various electrospinning methods of nanofibre formation. Fibres Text. East. Eur. 2009, 72, 13–19.
  21. Arkoun, M.; Daigle, F.; Heuzey, M.-C.; Ajji, A. Antibacterial electrospun chitosan-based nanofibers: A bacterial membrane perforator. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 865–874.
  22. Yalcinkaya, F. A review on advanced nanofiber technology for membrane distillation. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2019, 14.
  23. Zhang, S.; Huang, Y.Q.; Yang, X.P.; Mei, F.; Ma, Q.; Chen, G.Q.; Ryu, S.K.; Deng, X.L. Gelatin nanofibrous membrane fabricated by electrospinning of aqueous gelatin solution for guided tissue regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2009, 90, 671–679.
  24. Ko, J.H.; Yin, H.Y.; An, J.H.; Chung, D.J. Characterization of cross-linked gelatin nanofibers through electrospinning. Macromol. Res. 2010, 18, 137–143.
  25. Laha, A.; Yadav, S.; Majmdar, S.; Sharma, C.S. In-vitro release study of hydrophobic drug using electrospun cross-linked gelatin nanofibers. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 105, 481–488.
  26. Zhang, Y.Z.; Veugopal, J.; Huang, Z.-M.; Lim, C.T.; Ramakrishna, S. Crosslinking of the electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Polymer 2006, 47, 2911–2917.
  27. Hohammadzadehmoghadam, S.; Dong, Y. Fabrication and characterization of electrospun silk fibroin/gelatin scaffolds crosslinked with glutaraldehyde vapor. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 91.
  28. Angarano, M.; Schulz, S.; Fabritius, M.; Vogt, R.; Steinberg, T.; Tomakidi, P.; Friedrich, C.; Mülhaupt, R. Layered gradient nonwovens of in situ crosslinked electrospun collagenous nanofibers used as modular scaffold systems for soft tissue regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 3277–3285.
  29. Chen, H.-C.; Jao, W.-C.; Yang, M.-C. Characterization of gelatin nanofibers electrospun using ethanol/formid acid/water as a solvent. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2009, 20, 98–103.
  30. Takigawa, T.; Endo, Y. Effects of glutaraldehyde exposure on human health. J. Occup. Health 2006, 48, 75–87.
  31. Ballantyne, B.; Myers, R.C. The acute toxicity and primary irritancy of glutaraldehyde solutions. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 2001, 43, 193–202.
  32. Zeiger, E.; Gollapudi, B.; Spencer, P. Genetic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies of glutaraldehyde—A review. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2005, 589, 136–151.
  33. Damink, L.H.H.O.; Dijkstra, P.J.; van Luyn, M.J.A.; van Wachem, P.B.; Nieuwenhuis, P.; Feijen, J. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 765–773.
  34. Chang, W.-H.; Chang, Y.; Lai, P.-H.; Sung, H.-W. A genipin-crosslinked gelatin membrane as wound-dressing material: In vitro and in vivo studies. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2003, 14, 481–495.
  35. Solorio, L.; Zwolinski, C.; Lund, A.W.; Farrell, M.J.; Stegemann, J.P. Gelatin microspheres crosslinked with genipin for local delivery of growth factors. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2010, 4, 514–523.
  36. Vlasceanu, G.M.; Crica, L.E.; Pandele, A.M.; Ionita, M. Graphene oxide reinforcing genipin crosslinked chitosan-gelatin blend films. Coatings 2020, 10, 189.
  37. Yung, C.W.; Wu, L.Q.; Tullman, J.A.; Payne, G.F.; Bentley, W.E.; Barbari, T.A. Transglutaminase crosslinked gelatin as a tissue engineering scaffold. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2007, 83, 1039–1046.
  38. McDermott, M.K.; Chen, T.H.; Williams, C.M.; Markley, K.M.; Payne, G.F. Mechanical properties of biomimetic tissue adhesive based on the microbial transglutaminase-catalyzed crosslinking of gelatin. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 1270–1279.
  39. Liu, Y.X.; Weng, R.R.; Wang, W.H.; Wie, X.H.; Li, J.L.; Chen, X.J.; Liu, Y.H.; Lu, F.P.; Li, Y. Tunable physical and mechanical properties of gelatin hydrogel after transglutaminase crosslinking on two gelatin types. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 405–413.
  40. Shin, M.; Ishii, O.; Sueda, T.; Vacanti, J.P. Contractile cardiac grafts using a novel nanofibrous mesh. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 3717–3723.
  41. Dhandayuthapani, B.; Krishna, U.M.; Sethuraman, S. Fabrication and characterization of chitosan-gelatin blend nanofibers for skin tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2010, 94, 264–272.
  42. Yin, -G.; Zhang, -Y.; Bao, -W.; Wu, -J.; Shi, D.-B.; Dong, Z.-h.; Fu, W.-G. Study on the properties of the electrospun silk fibroin/gelatin blend nanofibers for scaffolds. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 111, 1471–1477.
  43. Jalaja, K.; Anil Kumar, P.R.; Dey, T.; Kundu, S.C.; James, N.R. Modified dextran cross-linked electrospun gelatin nanofibres for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 114, 467–475.
  44. Gui, X.T.; Hu, J.L.; Han, Y.T. Random and aligned electrospun gelatin nanofiber mats for human mesenchymal stem cells. Mater. Res. Innov. 2019, 23, 208–215.
  45. Padrao, J.; Silva, J.P.; Dourado, F.; Lanceros-Méndez, S.; Sencadas, V. Modifying fish gelatin electrospun membranes for biomedical applications: Cross-linking and swelling behavior. Soft Mater. 2014, 12, 247–252.
  46. Gualandi, C.; Torricelli, P.; Panzavolta, S.; Pagani, S.; Focarete, M.L.; Bigi, A. An innovative co-axial system to electrospin in situ crosslinked gelatin nanofibers. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 11, 025007.
  47. Luo, X.S.; Guo, Z.Z.; He, P.; Chen, T.; Li, L.H.; Ding, S.; Li, H. Study on structure, mechanical property and cell cytocompatibility of electrospun collagen nanofibers crosslinked by common agents. Inter. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 476–486.
  48. Ghassemi, Z.; Slaughter, G. Cross-linked electrospun gelatin nanofibers for cell-based assays. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Honolulu, HI, USA, 18–21 July 2018.
  49. Hivechi, A.; Bahrami, S.H.; Siegel, R.A. Investigation of morphological, mechanical and biological properties of cellulose nanocrystal reinforced electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Intern. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 411–417.
  50. Laha, A.; Majumdar, S.; Sharma, C.S. Controlled drug release formulation by sequential crosslinking of multilayered electrospun gelatin nanofiber mat. MRS Adv. 2016, 1, 2107–2113.
  51. Del Gaudio, C.; Baiguera, S.; Boieri, M.; Mazzanti, B.; Ribatti, D.; Bianco, A.; Macchiarini, P. Induction of angiogenesis using VEGF releasing genipin-crosslinked electrospun gelatin mats. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 7754–7765.
  52. Inal, M.; Mülazimoglu, G. Production and characterization of bactericidal wound dressing material based on gelatin nanofiber. Intern. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 392–404.
  53. Rath, G.; Hussain, T.; Chauhan, G.; Garg, T.; Goyal, M.K. Development and characterization of cefazolin loaded zinc oxide nanoparticles composite gelatin nanofiber mats for postoperative surgical wounds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 58, 242–253.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback