1. Introduction
Motors and machines play a major role in the development and evolution of modern industry. Since 1959, when Richard Feynman predicted the flourishing research field of nanoscience and nanotechnology, abundant research about the miniaturization of motors and machines to micro/nanoscale have been executed. Micro/nanomotors (MNMTs) have been developed to perform delicate tasks in micro/nanoscale from drug/cargo delivery, tumor therapy, biodetoxification, precision surgery [
1] to environmental remediation [
2]. These applications are based on the autonomous motion of MNMTs that can convert chemical or physical energy into kinetic energy. In fact, the performance of MNMTs mostly relies on the intrinsic features of adopted materials. At first, most MNMTs are made of metals and metal oxides such as Au, Pt, ZnO, and Cu
2O to achieve propulsion by a chemical gradient in hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) [
3]. When applied in biomedicine, the chemical fuel is toxic to human. Furthermore, most of them are rigid and inflexible. It is easy to harm the soft tissue in the human body where intricate and soft channels are present everywhere. In addition, polymer-based and bio-hybrid MNMTs have good biocompatibility and low toxicity. However, low stability, fast degradation, and quick clearance are other hurdles for their long-time use. To address these challenges, there is still a strong desire for the incorporation of attractive materials to further expand the application fields of MNMTs.
The room temperature liquid metals (LMs) are a unique group of metals that behave like liquids near room temperature. The pure LMs include cesium (Cs, melting point = 28.5 °C), francium (Fr, 27 °C), rubidium (Rb, 39.3 °C), mercury (Hg, −38.8 °C), and gallium (Ga, 29.8 °C). Among these types of LMs, Hg is highly toxic, Cs and Rb are very reactive, and Fr is radioactive. In comparison, Ga and Ga-based alloys such as EGaIn (75.5 wt% gallium and 24.5 wt% indium) and Galinstan (68.5 wt% gallium, 21.5 wt% indium, and 10 wt% tin), have high chemical stability and negligible toxicity. The Ga-based LMs have recently shown great values in various scopes of applications owing to their unique properties (), such as basic metallic characteristics (high thermal conductivity, good electrical conductivity, radiopacity, and electromagnetic properties), amorphous properties (superb fluidity, excellent flexibility, shape transformability, self-healing capability, reconfigurability, and low viscosity), and several featured properties (facile functionalization accessibility, good biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity, catalytic properties, photothermal/photodynamic capability, and stimuli responsiveness). Because of these unique properties, LMs hold a great possibility to supplement the vacant applications of conventional materials-based MNMTs, such as microfluidics [
4,
5], repairing nanonetwork [
6], imaging [
7], cancer-targeting [
8,
9], vascular embolism, and so on [
10,
11].
Table 1. Ga-based liquid metal (LM) properties and applications.
Liquid metal motors can be powered by various energy sources, including chemical fuels (water, NaOH solution, and H
2O
2 solution), external stimuli (electrical, acoustic, magnetic, and light fields), and hybrid sources (A). A brief introduction of different propulsion methods of liquid metal motors is summarized in . Under the motivation of these driving sources, liquid metal motors can not only perform a directional movement, circular motion, and self-rotation, but also a unique large-scale deformation. It is worth mentioning that the mechanisms behind the movement and deformation of LM motors highly depend on the size of LM. B shows the relationship between the size of LM and the corresponding driving force. For macroscopic LM motors, the large-scale deformations induced by surface tension are very intriguing [
38,
39], but the corresponding propulsion is still a challenge due to the requirement of the large driving force. Additionally, the definition of motors emphasizes the significance of directional translational motion [
40]. As the size of the LM decreases to less than 1 cm, the propulsion has been successfully and extensively reported. Thus, LM motors below 1 cm, named mini/micro/nano scale liquid metal motors (MLMTs) (MCLMTs for micro/nano LM motors; MILMTs for mini LM motors) will be discussed in this paper. When the size of MLMT is between 1 cm and 1 mm, it is still in a fully liquid state, so it can realize a self-deformation and adapt to its surroundings [
41]. At this length scale, the movement of MLMTs requires less driving force, and the main driving force is bubbles recoil force and surface tension. Once the size of the LM declines to the micro-nano field, asymmetric structure designs of LM are essential to achieve effective propulsion. Although the surface oxide makes the MLMTs in a core-shell structure, it is helpful to maintain its shape, separate state, and prevent fusion [
6,
8,
25], as it can also cause deformation. So far, although great progress has been achieved in MLMTs, it is still a significant challenge to quickly mass-produce MLMTs, precisely control the motion, perform more delicate tasks, and achieve more potential applications. Based on the extensive exploration of the tremendous ubiquitous characteristics of LM over past decades, there are vast opportunities to endow motors with new vitality and impart fresh life in more possible filed by combining the prominent properties of LM with MNMTs.
Figure 1. The propulsion mechanism of LM motors. (A) LM motors propelled by different energy sources. (B) The relationship between the size of LM motors and corresponding driving force.
Table 2. Overview of different propulsion methods of mini/micro/nano scale liquid metal motors (MLMTs).
In this paper, we will first introduce the properties of micro/nanoscale LMs to guide researchers interested in the utilization of LMs to meet their specific needs. Then, the preparation, driving mechanism, and application of MLMTs are summarized. In particular, the different principles and methods behind the fabrication and propulsion of MLMTs of different sizes will be highlighted in this part. Lastly, the challenge and future outlook will be given.
Figure 2. Shapes of LM micro/nanomaterials (LMMMs) and motors. (
A) Different shapes of LM nanomaterials. (
i) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of eutectic gallium indium liquid alloy micro-and nanoparticles [
45]. (
ii) TEM of EGaIn alloy rods [
25]. (
iii) SEM image of EGaIn nanorices [
47]. The asymmetric shape of MCLMTs: (
B) Janus sphere [
6] and (
C) needle [
8].
In addition to the ultrasonic method, LM nanorods can also be prepared by the pressure-filter-template method [
8,
9]. It should be noted that this method produces nanorods by generating surface oxides of Ga
2O
3 instead of GaO(OH) mentioned above because the reaction of Ga with oxygen at mild temperatures forms Ga
2O
3. Additionally, Ga
2O
3 on the surface is necessary to stabilize the rod shape because of the inner amorphous liquid Ga.
The shape of LMMMs highly affects the effective propulsion and function of MCLMTs [
40], thus should be carefully considered to meet specific requirements in various potential applications. It is worth mentioning that the relation between the shape or structure and propulsion mechanism is universal to MNMTs of other materials, and more information can be found in these reviews [
3,
53,
54]. Fundamentally, the shape of LMMMs significantly influences the propulsion mechanism [
40]. For instance, the Janus-sphere constructed by applying other materials such as Pt on half of it (B) can be propelled in H
2O
2 by bubbles ejected from one side of it [
6]; rods with two ends that differ in size are the prerequisite for MCLMTs to achieve movement by producing enough pressure difference along the long axis under the ultrasonic field or light field (C). When increasing the size difference of two ends, this rod motor can achieve a higher speed than the normal rod one [
9]. By contrast, spheres can be hardly propelled by these two fields, because the symmetry lengths of diameters cannot produce enough pressure difference. For MCLMTs motivated by magnetic fields, special designs such as helical tails and dumbbell-like shapes are required [
49]. Besides, the function of LMNPs can also be influenced by their shape. The LM nanomotors in rod [
9] and needle [
8] shape are more likely to be developed to open the cell membrane mechanically. Compared with the spherical counterpart, they can move in a rotating way and have a smaller contact area with the cell. Furthermore, these rod and needle LM nanomotors would transform into spheres in the acid environment such as endosomes [
9], which is beneficial for further fuses and degrades in cells. Moreover, LMNPs can disrupt the endosomal membrane to achieve effective drug delivery by the transformation to the hollow rod by light irradiation [
20]. Another similar transformation is utilized to break the bacterial biofilm, which can achieve a 99% killing rate of bacterial [
22].
2.2. Electrical/Thermal Properties
LMNPs are normally non-conductive because of their semi-conductive Ga
2O
3 oxide skin. However, external stimuli could remove or break this oxide and high conductivity can be regained. Many methods are adapted to form a highly conductive path, including laser sintering [
55], mechanical sintering [
46], and peeling off [
56]. During these methods, mechanical sintering [
57] is a facile way to induce a conductive path by introducing particle interface rupture, allowing the inner LM to flow out to coalesce into a continuous liquid conductive circuit. It is operated at room temperature without requiring any complex equipment. In addition, the acid vapor [
58] and mechanical fracturing [
59] can be used to remove the LM oxide and achieve the conductive pathway as well. For example, Kim et al. proved that the hydrochloric acid (HCl) vapor can be applied to react with the oxide skin of Galinstan (Ga
2O
3 and Ga
2O) and change it into InCl
3 and GaCl
3, which poses a better conductivity than the initial LM particles [
58]; Wang et al. used this method to remove the oxide skin on LM Janus nanomotors to achieve a conducive state, thus having the function of repairing silver nanowire networks [
6].
The melting point of various LMNPs is generally influenced by their alloying elements and size. Ga and most LM have low melting points and high boiling points, keeping them in the liquid state across a wide temperature range (8–2200 °C). Generally, the melting point of Ga-based alloy is even lower than pure Ga and is influenced by the composition ratio of different elements [
44]. Moreover, the size of LMNPs is proven to change the melting point of LM significantly [
60], as the melting temperature was found to be decreased relative to values of bulk LM. According to Ghigna et al. [
55], the analysis of extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectra of Ga particles shows the melting point of LMNPs (diameter ~150 nm) was 300 K, similar to that of the bulk value (303 K), while an approximate 110 K and 20 K decrease was observed for LMNPs with diameters around 10 nm and 30 nm, respectively. Similarly, recent research [
48,
56] on the size dependence of the melting point of LMNPs supports the aforementioned trends. Based on the supercooling nature and high conductivity of LMNPs, Simge et al. reported a facile heat-free joining technique [
59]. This technology breaks the outer oxide layers of LMNPs through mechanical stressing or shearing, thus triggering the inside fluid flow accompanied by deformation, alloying, and solidification.
2.3. Optical Properties
Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) is a surface charge density oscillation at certain optical frequencies, which can occur on most kinds of metals. For Ga-based LMNPs, the oscillation frequency of an electron cloud lies in the range of the ultraviolet to the visible light [
61,
62,
63]. Strategies involving particle size and shape control [
64,
65], surface oxide thickness adjustment [
66], alloy composition changing [
67], and substoichiometric doping levels of metal oxide on the LM surface [
68] can be utilized to control UV-plasmonic of Ga-based LMPs.
In the near-infrared (NIR) light range, although a strong absorption peak has not been observed in LM, it turns out LMNPs have a high photothermal conversion efficacy with the irradiation of NIR light. The photothermal properties of LM treated with NIR light have received increasing attention since the Miyako group’s investigation on it, where they prepared EGaIn nanocapsule encapsulated by DSPE-PEG2000-Amine and DC (8,9) PC with core-shell structure [
69]. Under 1 W (80 mW/mm
2) irradiation with a 785 nm NIR laser, it shows a quick temperature rise, superior photothermal conversion efficiency, and photothermal stability. The surface temperature of the 1 mg LM droplet quickly rose from 20 °C to 43 °C after 5 min irradiation (A). In addition, the photothermal conversion efficiency of the LM nanocapsules is almost 3 times that of commercial Au-NR
1 (52% and 17%, respectively). Moreover, the optical absorbance of the LM capsule can last for 1 h without observed degradation.
Figure 3. The photothermal effect of LMMMs. (
A) Visible light and thermographic images of a LM droplet (1 mg) before and after irradiation with a 785 nm NIR laser at 1 W for 5 min. Scale bars, 2 mm [
69]. (
B) Schematic illustration of the photothermal effects of three different kinds of LM nanomaterials [
31]. (
C) (
i) The scheme of morphology changes of LM and LM@MSN after 808 nm laser irradiation. Representative TEM images of LMNPS (
ii) and LMNPs@MSN (
iii) after 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm
2) for 10 min [
34].
Then, a great number of researchers explore the photothermal application in cancer therapy and prove it has an excellent therapeutic effect. Sun et al. systematically evaluated the photothermal properties of various LMMMs, such as Ga nanorods (GaNR), Ga nanospheres (GaNS), and gallium-indium alloy nanorods (LMNR) [
31]. Additionally, results show that GaNR exhibited an outstanding photothermal conversion efficiency and distinct temperature elevation compared to GaNS and LMNR. However, the poor thermal stability of pure LMMMs after irradiation impedes their broader applications. Hu et al. proposed a surface mesoporous silica coating strategy on LMNPs (LMNPs@MSN) (B) [
34], which significantly improved the stability and sustainability of the photothermal performance of LMNPs (C). With the modification of HA and loading of doxorubicin (Dox), LMNPs showed significant inhibition of solid tumor growth by the combination of photothermal and chemotherapy both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Similarly, another group proved [
35] that LMNPs coated with silica and modified with RGD peptides are an efficient photothermal conversion nano agent. Besides, when LMNPs embedded in poly (NIPAm-co-MBA) hydrogels (PNM) the photothermal conversion efficiency was improved, causing the temperature rise to exceed the shrinkage threshold of the hydrogels, thus promoting the controlled release of drugs (Dox) [
32]. In addition, LMNPs and drugs can be loaded on other nanoparticles and show excellent photothermal and chemical synergistic therapy as well [
33].
2.4. Oxidability
LMNPs easily form a thin oxide skin on the surface even in an extremely low-oxygen environment. The thickness of this oxide skin varies from 0.7 nm to 3 nm [
45,
52] depending on but not limited to oxygen concentration [
70], vapor concentration, surfactant [
45,
47,
70], and oxide-forming time [
52]. In most cases, the composition of this oxide skin is mostly Ga
2O
3, with a little fraction of In or Sn. The co-existence of LM and this oxide exhibits unique physiochemical properties such as facilitating electron extraction [
71], improving photocatalytic activity [
72], and providing a strategy for adjusting surface plasmon resonances [
66,
73]. Besides, the size, shape, morphology, thermal, electrical, and optical properties of LMNPs are influenced by the LM oxide significantly, which is described in the respective sections. Furthermore, LM oxide provides a surface conjugation site for functionalization. Surfactants including thiols [
70,
74], PEGylating [
75], and positive-charged molecules [
51] and other strategies such as membrane coating [
8] and metal particles coating [
76] are successfully assembled on the surface of LM, which is vitally important for the application of LMNPs in biomedicine, on-demand design of MLMTs and other fields.
Among many surfactants, thiol can not only help to stabilize LMNPs, but also can serve for drug delivery and tumor targeting. Hohman et al. investigated the function of thiol-containing molecules in the process of EGaIn nanodroplets formation [
45]. The results show that the thiols further decrease the size of LMNPs and prevent rapid agglomeration, which is attributed to the formation of a metal thiolate complex. Besides, EGaIn functionalized with thiolated (2-hydroxypropyl)-b-cyclodextrin and thiolated hyaluronic acid have the function of targeting drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapeutic inhibition towards the tumor [
77]. These two thiols not only cap EGaIn, but more importantly serves as a drug (Dox)-loading and active targeting moiety, respectively. However, there are still some defects for these thiol-terminated surfactants. For example, some thiol groups tend to couple with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inactivate metalloenzymes in the human body. Many thiols are water-insoluble, which is hard to stabilize LMNPs in water. Apart from thiols, PEGylating provides effective strategies to improve the water-stability of LMNPs. For example, Chechetka prepared LM nanodroplets with PEGylating modification, showing high water dispersibility and no precipitations for at least three days at 20 °C [
69]. Sun et al. added thiol-polyethylene glycol-thiol (HS-PEG-HS) into LMNPs preparation solution to obtain well water-dispersed LMNPs, stable for months [
31]. Moreover, some surfactants can contribute to the formation of LMNPs in various shapes. For example, melanin helps the formation of rice-shaped LMNPs, which turns out to have the best photothermal conversion efficiency among the LMNPs in the sphere, rod, and rice shape [
47]. In addition, lysozyme (positively charged surfactants) play a significant role in the sphere-rod transformation of LMNPs while no rod structure was observed with negatively charged surfactants.
Other surface modification strategies have also been implemented on LMNPs. The cell membrane can be assembled onto the surface of LMNPs through an acoustically assisted nanovesicle fusion method [
8], which enables MLMTs capable of avoiding bio-fouling and actively seeking cancer cells. In addition, the other metal particles can also be added to the surface of the metal to form “liquid marbles”. Galinstan coated with insulators (including Tefl on and silica) and semiconductors (including WO
3, TiO
2, MoO
3, In
2O
3, and carbon nanotubes) have mechanical stability and new functionality [
76]. Further, Zhang et al. reported a LM marble with WO
3 coating in microscale, which has high sensitivity towards low concentrations of heavy metal ions, and enhanced solar light-driven photocatalytic activities [
73].