Regarding their mechanistic of cell penetrability, although not conclusively elucidated, it has been shown that CPPs traverse hydrophobic membranes and enter into cells through distinct routes, relying on both membrane-disruptive and non-disruptive processes, this later comprising energy-dependent, receptor-mediated and receptor-independent endocytosis, as well as energy independent, direct translocation strategies. Hence, pathways for CPP entry into cells involve: (I) non-disruptive endocytic routes, such as clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated uptake, clathrin/caveolae-independent endocytosis and micropinocytosis; (II) non-disruptive membrane, direct translocation by alternative routes, like inverted micelle formation and “carpet” model penetration; (III) direct translocation by membrane-disruptive routes, such as pore-formation (toroid and barrel-stave pores) and electroporation-like permeabilization. Moreover, based on experimental evidence with numerous known CPPs, more than a single pathway of membrane permeation and cellular internalization may be involved, depending on the CPP physicochemical features, effective concentrations (i.e., the peptide-to-cell ratio) and targeted cell types [19,20,32]. Although distinct pathways are involved in membrane translocation and internalization of several distinct CPPs investigated, the mode of membrane interaction, the efficacy of CPP-mediated cargo-dependent transport, subcellular compartmentalization and eventual adverse cytotoxic effects, depend not only on their own CPP structures but also on the position and nature of the molecular cargoes and the types of cell targets, as observed with CPPs that were conjugated with fluorescent dyes and polypeptides [32–36].
To date, native venom peptides with cell-penetrating properties have been identified in a limited number of species of insects (bees and wasps), arachnids (spiders and scorpions), fish, amphibians and snakes (elapids and pit vipers). These CPPs have dual or multiple biological activities and are derived from the venoms or skin secretions, which are toxigenic, cytotoxic or antimicrobials. These venom CPPs include melittin from the honeybee, anoplin and mastoparans from wasps, latarcin and lycosin from spiders, chlorotoxin, maurocalcine and imperatoxin from scorpions, cardiotoxin, crotamine, crotalicidin and elapid cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptides (CRAMPs) from snakes, pardaxin from fish skin and bombesin from frog skin (Table 1).
Table 1. Poisonous and venomous organisms that produce toxins with cell penetrability that originate cell-penetrating peptides
Scientific name |
Common name |
Toxin or toxin template |
Obs.
|
Insects |
|
|
Table 2, below |
Apis mellifera |
European honey bee |
Melittin |
|
Anoplius samariensis |
Japanese solitary wasp |
Anoplin |
|
Vespula lewisii |
Korean leather-jacket |
Mastoparan |
|
|
|
|
|
Arachnids |
|
|
Table 3 |
Lachesana tarabevi |
Central Asian spider |
Latarcin-1 |
|
Lycosa singorensis |
Wolf spider |
Lycosin-1 |
|
Leiurus quinquestriatus |
Israeli yellow scorpion |
Chlorotoxin |
|
Scorpio maurus palmatus |
Tunisian scorpion |
Maurocalcine |
|
Pandinus imperator |
African scorpion |
Imperatoxin-A |
|
Hadrurus gertschi |
Mexican scorpion |
Hadrucalcin |
|
Urodacus manicatus |
Australian Black Rock scorpion |
Wasabi receptor toxin |
|
|
|
|
|
Fish |
|
|
|
Pardachirus sp |
Mole sole fishes |
Pardaxin |
Table 4 |
|
|
|
|
Amphibian |
|
|
Table 4 |
Bombina bombina |
European fire-bellied toad |
Bombesin |
|
|
|
|
|
Snakes |
|
|
Table 4 |
Crotalus durissus terrificus |
South American rattlesnake |
crotamine |
|
|
|
crotalicidin |
|
Naja sp |
Cobras |
Cardiotoxin |
|
The importance of this class of bioactive peptides relies on the fact that venom peptides and toxins, as well as related sequences, have evolved for millions of years of natural history and can be considered crucial improvements in peptide design that efficiently performs their functions. Importantly, native animal venom peptides and toxins with cell-penetrating activity have been characterized and CPPs derived from them conceived through a variety of structural modifications of their native sequences. These structural modifications of cell-penetrating venom peptides include peptide downsizing, amino acid residue replacement, structural stabilization and production of chimeras, which mostly reduced peptide cytotoxicity, maintained the target selectivity and enhanced the cellular penetrability and the capacity of intracellular cargo transport and delivery.
Tables 2 to 4 summarize examples of known venom peptides, toxins and derivatives with cell-penetrating properties, their overall structures, mode of cell entry, and conveyed compounds.
Table 2. Examples of peptides from insect (honey bee and wasp) venom and derivatives with cell-penetrating property.
Peptide |
Sequence a |
Size |
Major Structural Features b |
Mechanism(s) of Cell Penetration c |
Cargo Delivery d |
Ref. |
Honey bee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mellitin (MEL) |
GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQ-NH2 |
26 |
Amphipathic α-helix |
DT, PF |
FD |
[49] |
Tat/CM18 hybrid |
|
|
Chimera |
DT, MD, ND |
CI |
[52] |
MEL-d(KLAKLAK)2 |
GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQGGGGS-d[KLAKLAKKLAKLAK] |
45 |
Chimera |
DT (?) |
AP |
[53] |
p5RHH |
VLTTGLPALISWIRRRHRRHC |
21 |
C-terminal fragment |
Endocytosis (?) |
DNA polyplexes |
[54,55] |
p5RWR |
VLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQRWRRRR |
25 |
C-terminal fragment |
Endocytosis (?) |
DNA polyplexes |
[54,55] |
MT20 |
GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWI |
20 |
Hydrophobic helix |
DT, MD |
DNA polyplexes |
[56] |
FL20 |
GIGAILKVLATGLPTLISWI |
20 |
Hydrophobic helix |
DT, MD |
DNA polyplexes |
[56] |
Melittin [1–14] |
GIGAVLKVLTTGLP |
14 |
N-terminal fragment |
DT |
NC, LP |
[57] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anoplin |
GLLKRIKTLL-NH2 |
10 |
Amphipathic α-helix |
DT, PF |
FD |
[60] |
Anoplin dimer |
(GLLKRIKTLL-NH2)2 |
20 |
C-N terminal dimer |
DT, PF |
- |
[61] |
Mastoparan |
INLKALAALAKKIL-NH2 |
14 |
Amphipathic α-helix |
DT, PF |
- |
[64] |
Mastoparan-X |
INWKGIAAMAKKLL-NH2 |
14 |
Amphipathic α-helix |
DT, PF |
- |
[65] |
Transportan |
GWTLNSAGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL-NH2 |
27 |
Chimera |
multiple |
CI |
[66] |
TP10 |
AGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL-NH2 |
21 |
Shorter transportan |
multiple |
CI |
[70,77] |
TP10-5 |
AGYLLGKINLKKLAKL(Aib)KKIL-NH2 |
21 |
Helical stabilized |
DT |
FD |
[71] |
Transportan 9dR |
GWTLNSAGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL(dR)9 |
36 |
Chimera |
Endocytosis (?) |
siRNA |
[73] |
Mitoparan |
INLKKLAKL(Aib)KKIL-NH2 |
14 |
Mastoparan analog |
DT |
FD, AP |
[78–80] |
Notes: a-NH2, amidated peptide; anoplin C-N terminal dimer, as prepared by intermolecular triazole bridge; Aib, α-aminoisobutyric acid; bParticular structural characteristics of native, designed or analogous peptides; C-N terminal dimer, intermolecular dimerization involving the carboxyl-terminus of one peptide and the amino-terminus of the other; cDT, direct translocation; PF, pore-forming; MD, membrane-disruptive cell uptake; NR, non-disruptive penetration; RM, receptor-mediated endocytosis; HI, hydrophobic insertion; multiple, more than a single mechanism of cell entry, that can involve direct translocation and endocytosis; dFD, fluorescent dyes; CI, diverse types of cell impermeant cargoes; AP, apoptotic peptides; NC, nanocrystals; LP, large proteins; RD, radionuclides; EZ, enzymes; IR, infrared; “-,” not applicable.
Table 3. Examples of peptides and derivatives from arachnid venoms with cell-penetrating and cargo delivery capacity.
Peptide |
Sequence |
Size |
Major structural features |
Mechanism(s) of cell Penetration |
Cargo delivery |
Ref. |
Spider |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latarcin-1 (Ltc1) |
SMWSGMWRRKLKKLRNALKKKLKGE |
25 |
cationic α-helix |
DT, PF |
FD |
[81] |
Ltc1-decapeptide (LDP) |
KWRRKLKKLR |
10 |
Designed |
DT |
FD |
[82] |
LDP-NLS |
KWRRKLKKLRPKKKRKV |
17 |
Chimera |
ED |
FD, EZ |
[83] |
Lycosin-I |
RKGWFKAMKSIAKFIAKEKLKEHL |
24 |
Amphipathic α-helix |
DT, ND |
FD, NP |
[87,88] |
R-lycosin-I |
Ac-RGWFRAMRSIARFIARERLREHL-amide |
24 |
Lys-->Arg analog |
ED |
FD |
[89] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scorpion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorotoxin (CTX) |
MCMPCFTTDHQMARKCDDCCGGKGRGKCYGPQCLCR |
36 |
ICKfold/knottin |
ED |
FD, RD |
[91–93] |
[K15R/K23R]CTX |
MCMPCFTTDHQMARRCDDCCGGRGRGKCYGPQCLCR |
36 |
Mutant analog |
ED |
FD |
[95] |
[K15R/K23R/Y29W]CTX |
MCMPCFTTDHQMARRCDDCCGGRGRGKCWGPQCLCR |
36 |
Mutant analog |
ED |
FD |
[95] |
Maurocalcine (MCa) |
GDCLPHLKLCKENKDCCSKKCKRRGTNIEKRCR |
33 |
ICK fold/knottin |
DT, ND |
CI, NP |
[99–101] |
MCaUF1–9-C |
GDAbuLPHLKLC |
10 |
Truncated, unfold |
DT |
FD |
[105] |
Imperatoxin A (IpTxa) |
GDCLPHLKRCKADNDCCGKKCKRRGTNAEKRCR |
33 |
ICK fold/knottin |
n |
FD |
[109] |
Hadrucalcin (HdCa) |
SEKDCIKHLQRCRENKDCCSKKCSRRGTNPEKRCR |
35 |
ICK fold/knottin |
DT, ND |
- |
[110] |
HadUF1−11 (H11) |
SEKDAbuIKHLQR-C |
12 |
N-terminal fragment |
DT, ND, ED (?) |
NP |
[111] |
WaTx |
ASPQQAKYCYEQCNVNKVPFDQCYQMCSPLERS |
33 |
CS-helical hairpin |
DT, ND |
FD |
[112] |
Notes: Ac, acetylated; -NH2, amidated; Abu, Lys®Arg replacement; C-S, cysteine stabilized α-helix; DT, direct translocation; PF, pore-forming; ED, endocytosis; ND, non-disruptive penetration; RM, receptor-mediated endocytosis; HI, hydrophobic insertion; multiple, more than a single mechanism of cell entry, that can involve direct translocation and endocytosis; “n“, not informed; FD, fluorescent dyes; EZ, enzymes; NP, nanoparticles; RD, radionuclides; CI, diverse types of cell impermeant cargoes; “-“, not applicable.
Table 4. Examples of peptides and derivatives from fish and amphibian secretion and snake venom, with cell-penetrating and cargo delivery capacity.
Peptide |
Sequence a |
Size |
Major Structural Features b |
Mechanism(s) of Cell Penetration c |
Cargo Delivery d |
Ref. |
Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ac-Pardaxin P5 |
Ac-GFFALIPKIISSPLFKTLLSAVGSALSSSGDQE |
33 |
Hydrophobic helix |
DT, PF |
FD |
[117] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amphibian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bombesin |
EQKLGNQWAVGHLM-NH2 |
14 |
helical hairpin |
RM |
- |
[118–120] |
Tat-K3-bombesin1-14 |
RKKRRQRRRGGCGEQKLGNQWAVGHLM-NH2 |
27 |
Chimera |
RM |
RD |
[124] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crotamine |
YKQCHKKGGHCFPKEKICLPPSSDFGKMDCRWRWKCCKKGSG |
42 |
β-defensin fold |
multiple |
FD, CI |
[138] |
NrTP1 |
YKQCHKKGGKKGSG |
14 |
N«C splice variant |
multiple |
FD |
[146,147] |
NrTP6 |
YKQSHKKGGKKGSG |
14 |
NrTP1 CysDSer |
multiple |
FD, EZ |
[148] |
DY676-NrTP6 |
C-YKQSHKKGGKKGSG |
15 |
Extra Cys |
|
IR |
[152] |
CyLop-1 |
CRWRWKCCKK |
10 |
Encrypted sequence |
DT, ED |
FD |
[145] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crotalicidin |
KRFKKFFKKVKKSVKKRLKKIFKKPMVIGVTIPF |
34 |
Amphipathic α-helix |
DT, PF |
FD |
[176] |
Ctn[15–34] |
KKRLKKIFKKPMVIGVTIPF-NH2 |
20 |
C-terminal fragment |
DT, PF |
FD |
[170,176] |
cathelicidin- BF30 |
KFFRKLKKSVKKRAKEFFKKPRVIGVSIPF |
30 |
Shorter analog |
DT, PF |
- |
|
Cardiotoxin |
LKCNKLIPLAYKTCPAGKNLCYKMFMVSNKTVPVKRGCID ACPKNSLLVKYVCCNTDRCN |
60 |
Three-finger fold |
DT, HI |
FD |
[179] |
PLA2 C-terminal |
KKYKAYFKFKCKK-NH2 |
13 |
C-terminal fragment |
DT, MD |
- |
[185] |
PLA2 fragment K®R |
RRYRAYFRFRCRR-NH2 |
13 |
Mutant K-->R |
DT, MD |
- |
[185] |
BPP-13a |
<EGGWPRPGEIPP |
12 |
Native |
DT (?) |
- |
[187] |
desPyr-BPP13a |
GGWPRPGPEIPP |
12 |
Mutant analog |
DT (?) |
FD |
[187] |
Notes: aAc, acetylated; -NH2, amidated; <E, pyroglutamic; DT, direct translocation; bN«C, a spliced derivative of crotamine, comprising the N-terminal residues 1 to 9 and C-terminal 38 to 42 ([1–9] ~ [38–42]); NrTP6, an NrTP1 with a Cys-Ser replacement; DY676, near-infrared dye; cDT, direct translocation; PF, pore-forming; RM, receptor-mediated endocytosis; multiple, more than a single mechanism of cell entry, that can involve direct translocation and endocytosis; ED, endocytosis; HI, hydrophobic insertion; MD, membrane-disruptive cell uptake; dFD, fluorescent dyes; RD, radionuclides; EZ, enzymes; IR, infrared dye; “-“ not applicable;
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/toxins13020147