The core principle behind mRNA vaccines is to encode the antigen in the mRNA and then to deliver the transcript to the host cell cytoplasm using a non-viral delivery system, allowing antigen expression and induction of an antigen-specific immune response. Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) is a type of mRNA that also encodes viral replicase, which enables the RNA to self-replicate upon delivery into the cell.
In December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) virus emerged, causing a respiratory illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in Hubei province, China [1,2]. The virus has spread globally, with the World Health Organization (WHO) declaring it a Public Health Emergency of International concern on 30 January 2020 and a pandemic officially on 7 March 2020 . There is a strong consensus globally that a COVID-19 vaccine is likely the most effective approach to sustainably controlling the COVID-19 pandemic . There has been an unprecedented research effort and global coordination which has resulted in the rapid development of vaccine candidates and initiation of human clinical trials. This has included conventional vaccine technologies such as viral vectors and adjuvanted subunits, but we have witnessed a renaissance in the field of RNA vaccines and a shift towards synthetic RNA platforms (Figure 1) [5,6]. In fact, one of the first vaccine to start clinical trials was a non-replicating mRNA vaccine from Moderna, mRNA-1273 [7,8,9]; the first patient was vaccinated on 16 March at the same time as a Chinese clinical trial was initiated with an adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) vector . Furthermore, the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine, BNT162b2, was the first COVID-19 vaccine to receive approval, first in the United Kingdom and then Canada, with an impressive 95% efficacy . Since this time there have been several mRNA vaccine trials initiated, and publication of corresponding preclinical and clinical data, see Table 1.
Figure 1. A comparison of vaccine platforms including vaccines derived from the virus itself and are formulated as a part or whole modified version of the virus (left) and nucleic acid vaccines, such as self-amplifying RNA vaccines (right). Nucleic acid vaccines are derived from knowledge of the viral genome, where glycoproteins are encoded into nucleic acids and delivered with either a synthetic carrier such as a lipid nanoparticle or an inert viral delivery system such as adenoviruses. The encoded antigen sequences are then expressed by the host cells.
Table 1. Published preclinical and clinical trial data with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
|Sponsor||Type of mRNA||Delivery System||Preclinical Data||Clinical Data|
The use of mRNA vaccines for pandemic response has been well described previously in preclinical [12,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] and clinical settings , but this is the first time we have seen the platforms deployed in a real pandemic setting . The core principle behind mRNA vaccines is to encode the antigen in the mRNA and then to deliver the transcript to the host cell cytoplasm using a non-viral delivery system, allowing antigen expression and induction of an antigen-specific immune response. This is especially advantageous as a vaccine platform as mRNA vaccines can be produced for any pathogen with a known protein target. mRNA is made using a cell-free enzymatic transcription reaction, which allows rapid and scalable manufacturing, as is evident from the swift pursuit of RNA vaccines in the current pandemic. Currently, there are three major types of RNA vaccines: conventional, non-amplifying mRNA molecules (mRNA), base-modified, non-amplifying mRNA molecules (bmRNA), which incorporate chemically modified nucleotides, and self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA or replicons) that maintain auto-replicative activity derived from an RNA virus vector. Self-amplifying RNA is beneficial compared to non-amplifying RNA as it maintains the advantages of mRNA vaccines, such as rapid development, modular design, and cell-free synthesis, but requires a lower dose of RNA due to the self-replicative properties. This reduces the burden of manufacturing for both the drug substance and product and is potentially advantageous in the context of pandemic response as it would enable a greater percentage of the population to be vaccinated in a shorter amount of time.
The four major pillars required for design and development of an saRNA vaccine are presented in Figure 2: Antigen design, vector design, non-viral delivery systems, and manufacturing (both saRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNP)). In will report on the major innovations, preclinical and clinical data reported in the last five years and will discuss future prospects (Figure 3). Pertinent reviews on plasmid DNA and non-replicating messenger RNA vaccines can be found at the following references, which provide insight into the mechanism of immune response and effects of route of delivery [35,36,37,38].
Figure 2. The Four Pillars of successful saRNA vaccine development. The antigens, vectors, delivery and manufacturing each represent modular components that need to be combined to make a successful drug product.
Figure 3. A timeline of innovations that have contributed to the development of saRNA vaccines and associated technologies. These include advances in technologies associated with each of the Four Pillars of a successful saRNA vaccine [27,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
saRNA vaccines have been primarily investigated for active vaccination strategies for prevention of infectious diseases, wherein the host’s cells produce a pathogenic antigen encoded in saRNA to induce a humoral and cellular immune response. saRNA encoding viral glycoproteins are the most predominant application, although this has recently been expanded to include bacterial infections (Chlamydia trachomatis , Group A and B Streptococci ), parasites (Toxoplasma gondii [59,60]) and cancer (colon carcinoma, [61,62] melanoma ). A more novel approach to saRNA antigen design includes encoding monoclonal antibodies for passive vaccination . While it is possible to incorporate relatively large (>4000 nt) or multiple antigens into an saRNA construct, the pDNA construct does have size limitations, so it may be advantageous to use separate saRNA constructs to encode multiple antigens if necessary .
There are three major forms of RNA vaccines based on the auto-replicative capacity of the mRNA and the inclusion of mammalian base-modifications. This section will focus on saRNA, or replicons, that maintain replicative activity derived from an RNA viral vector. Historically, positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses, such as alphaviruses, flaviviruses, and picornaviruses have been used for replicons. The best-studied self-amplifying mRNA molecules are derived from alphavirus genomes, such as those of the Sindbis virus, which have been previously reviewed in references [5,24,30,99,100].
The main challenge for saRNA vaccines is achieving sufficient delivery of saRNA to the target cells or tissue. saRNA constructs are relatively large (9000 to 15,000 nt), anionic molecules, which precludes efficient cellular uptake of unformulated saRNA. Despite the use of “naked” saRNA in some studies, three predominant delivery platforms have emerged: Polymeric nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, and nanoemulsions. These delivery strategies share a central dogma wherein the anionic saRNA is condensed by a cationic (or ionizable cationic) carrier to a nanoparticle of ~100 nm in size, that protects the saRNA from degradation and encourages uptake into target cells (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Non-viral saRNA delivery systems. Lipid-, polymer-, and emulsion-based delivery systems all use cationic groups to mediate condensation of the anionic RNA as well as delivery across the cell membrane. LNP systems, which have been found to be the most potent vaccine formulatinos, utilize a pH-sensitive ionizable cationic lipids and are taken up in cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis. In the endosome, the lower pH environment ionizes the cationic lipids, which then interacts electrostatically with anionic lipids in the endosomal membrane. These ion pairs cause a phase transition into a porous hexagonal phase (HII) that disrupts the endosome and facilitates release of the RNA into the cytoplasm.
While the manufacturing and production process for the formulated mRNA drug product can differ considerably depending on the type of formulation, a clinically relevant manufacturing process can be generalized into four steps: (1) Formulation, which involves one or more mixing steps, (2) downstream processing and purification, (3) sterile filtration through a 0.2 µm filter, (4) fill and finish. Presently, little information has been published regarding the specific manufacturing processes utilized for saRNA vaccine candidates currently in clinical trials. Hence, the preclinical processes for each formulation type will be generalized from methods published in the literature for lipid nanoparticles and nanoemulsions. To focus on potential clinical production, scalable continuous flow process steps are favored over fixed-volume processes.
While historical (pre-2015) preclinical studies of saRNA vaccines were predominantly focused on viral replicon particles and cancer applications, the field has more recently shifted to applications in viral infectious diseases, although a few studies have also explored prevention of parasitic and bacterial infections. The investigation of saRNA for passive immunization by encoding a monoclonal antibody is also a highly promising application that warrants further development. The clinical trials for rabies and SARS-CoV-2 are an exciting opportunity for the field of saRNA vaccines, and will no doubt be informative as to the characteristics of the immune response, required dose, duration of immunity, and required regimen. The field is also starting to consider methods to modulate the innate response to saRNA, which will no doubt be imperative to the clinical success of these vaccines, so that the lesson of DNA vaccine clinical trials are not forgotten . One strategy that may facilitate efficacious saRNA vaccines is utilizing evaluation models, such as skin explants that have human immune cells and innate sensing, in order to optimize molecular and delivery components. While the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic has been detrimental to economies and health, it’s provided a valuable opportunity to test saRNA vaccines in the clinical that otherwise might have taken decades. Given the short timespan required to design and test new saRNA vaccines (reportedly as little as 14 days in the case of Imperial College London) , it is clear that this platform is particularly well-suited to outbreaks, and also possibly seasonal vaccines, such as influenza. The rapid and easy manufacture of saRNA vaccines may also pave the way for a distributed manufacturing model where vaccines are produced locally in order to minimize logistical and cold-chain issues that could hinder widespread distribution of a vaccine. While immense progress was made in RNA vaccine technology in 2020 , the main limitations are now the stability, which requires storage at <80 °C for most RNA formulations , and minimizing the required dose in order to reduce associated side effects . Overall, saRNA vaccines have made monumental strides in the past five years, and the next five years will be telling as to the clinical utility and success of this promising vaccine platform.
This entry is adapted from 10.3390/vaccines9020097