You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Cr(VI) in Contaminated Coastal Groundwater: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Others

Chromium concentrations in seawater are less than 0.5 μg/L, but the Cr(VI) in contaminated coastal groundwater affected by Cr-bearing rocks/ores and/or human activities, coupled with the intrusion of seawater may reach values of hundreds of μg/L. A potential explanation for the sta-bility of the harmful Cr(VI) in contaminated coastal aquifers is still unexplored.

  • groundwater
  • contamination
  • chromium(VI)
  • salinization
  • borate
  • chromium isotopes

Note: The following contents are extract from your paper. The entry will be online only after author check and submit it.

1. Introduction

The scientific interest on the sustainable management of water resources and the effect on groundwater aquifers by either nature processes and/or extensive application in industry, is an attractive and fundamental subject to global food security. Among heavy metals, chromium (Cr) has become widespread in the environment. It appears in several oxidation states, the trivalent Cr(III) and hexavalent forms [Cr(VI)] being the most thermodynamically stable Cr forms in nature [1,2]. Cr(III) is necessary for lipid and sugar metabolism, and it is an essential trace element for human and animal health, whereas Cr(VI) in the food chain (groundwater, soil and plants), has created an alarming situation for human life and ecosystems [3–5]. Potential sources for the relatively high Cr contents in soil and groundwater may be the widespread Cr-bearing peridotites, which are parts of ophiolite complexes, covering more than 1% of the earth, along orogenetic zones [6], intense ore mining/smelting, industrial and agriculture activities (fertilizers and pesticides) [7,8]. The weathering processes of ultramafic rocks, depending mainly on the climate conditions and morphology, may result in the formation of laterites, both releasing significant amounts of Cr among other heavy metals (Ni, Co, Mn, Fe). Groundwater from sites characterized by the extensive presence of ultramafic rocks contain more than 10 μg/L Cr(VI), reaching values up to hundreds of μg/L of Cr(VI) [6,9–16]. The contamination of groundwater by Cr may be derived from industrial activities, such as in the Czech Republic (a highly industrialized country in Central Europe) [17], at the area of Friuli Venezia Giulia (northern Italy) [18], the Assopos Basin (Oinofyta or Inofyta, near the Assopos river) in Greece, exhibiting as high as 8000 μg/L Cr(VI) in shallow groundwater [19]. Additionally, ferrochromium (FeCr), which is a critical alloy in the production of stainless steel, is produced in several European countries (Finland, France, Italy, Norway, Sweden, the nations formerly comprising Yugoslavia, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the U.K.) generating Cr-bearing wastes [7,20].

In coastal groundwater that is contaminated by either Cr-bearing rocks/ores or industrial wastes, Cr(VI) often exceeds the maximum acceptable level for Crtotal in drinking water (50 μg/L) [21]. Such groundwater, at the interface zone between land and sea, is continually influenced by both marine and terrestrial processes, and it often contains elevated concentrations of Na, Cl, B, Li, Se, As, S, Ca, and Mg, which is characteristic of the seawater composition [22,23]. Although about one quarter of the global population lives in the vicinity of the world’s coastlines [24], the potential role of the presence of seawater components, which may significantly facilitate the Cr(VI) stability, inhibiting the Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III), is unexplored in groundwater. Additionally, because high technology metals such as the rare earth elements (REEs) have become contaminants in the environment [25,26], this study presents new data on the composition of coastal water, including REEs, from the industrial zone of the Assopos and other Neogene Basins. They are combined with available data from previous studies, and the delineated relationships are presented. A major aim was the interpretation of the Cr(VI) stability, as a function of the salinity in groundwater resulting from the intrusion of seawater, the prevention of groundwater from further degradation, and protection of the valuable water resources.

2. Chromium Background

Structure of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) and Soluble Products

Assuming that Cr(III) forms hexa-coordinate complexes with the octahedral arrangement of ligands, [Cr(H2O)63+] is the main Cr species in solutions of inorganic Cr(III) salts under strongly acidic pH, while at pH ≥ 4, Cr(III)-bound H2O molecules undergo hydrolysis, resulting in the formation of soluble oligomeric products, whilst polymeric products are insoluble (Figure 1) [27].

Figure 1. Soluble oligomeric product, Cr(OH)2(H2O)84+ by hydrolysis and polymerization of [Cr(H2O)63+] (modified after [27].

Surface waters commonly contain a mixture of soluble monomeric and oligomeric Cr-products [28]. Additionally, in the presence of organic matter, the formation of stable Cr(III) complexes with small organic molecules can increase their mobility at the source of contamination sites and maintain the solubility of Cr(III) even at neutral pH [27].

Chromate and dichromate have tetrahedral arrangements of coordinated oxygen (Figure 2). The chromate anion (CrO42−) is the predominant form of Cr(VI) in dilute solutions at neutral pH, co-existing in equilibrium with its protonated form [HCrO4] in an approximately 3:1 ratio at these conditions [29].

Figure 2. Structures of tetrahedral chromate, and dichromate (modified from ref [27]).

3. Geological and Hydrological Outline

Detailed studies in Greece have shown that the main aquifers in the Greece are developed in alluvial formations, such as Quaternary and Neogene unconsolidated deposits (porous aquifers) covering the lowlands and semi-mountainous area of Greece and in carbonate rocks (karstic aquifers) [30–38]. Specifically, the Neogene Assopos–Thiva Basin (Figure 3c) is mainly composed of tertiary and quaternary sediments of more than 400 m thickness, and expands over an area of approximately 700 km2. Alternations of marls and marly limestone occurs in the lowest parts of the basin sequences, and continental sediments consisting of conglomerates with small intercalations of marls, marly limestones, schists, sandstones, clays and flysch are dominant in the upper parts. A sharp tectonic contact between the sediment types, due to the intense neotectonic deformation, is a characteristic feature of the entire area [30]. The morpho-tectonic structure and evolution of this basin are the result of E–W to WNW–ESE trending fault systems, with peridotites and a Ni-laterite over-thrusted on the Triassic–Jurassic carbonates [30]. Quaternary sediments cover large parts of the Assopos valley and host two types of aquifers: (i) aquifers within Neogene conglomerates, sandstones and marly limestone to a depth of approximately 150 m; and (ii) karst type aquifers within the Triassic–Jurassic limestones at deeper levels of the basin, such as the Mavrosouvala aquifer [31–33]. The Neogene Basin of the Central Evia is characterized by strong geomorphological contrast and is built up mainly of Pleistocene to Holocene sediments hosting the most productive aquifers in this area. Strongly tectonized ultramafic rocks (harzburgites and lherzolites), over-thrusted onto Upper Cretaceous limestones and flysch sediments, are widespread in C. Evia. Alluvial deposits are the host rocks to the aquifer, which is probed by many shallow wells (10–180 m) or agricultural activities [11,12].

Figure 3. Sketch map showing locations of contaminated groundwater by Cr(VI) coasts (a) examples such as in California, Pakistan, India, Northern China, the Mediterranean Sea, etc. [23]; (b) Karstic-type aquifer developed in Neogene lacustrine formations of the Mesogeia Basin in Attica [34,35,37]; (c) simplified geological map presenting the sites of the groundwater well and soil samples at the C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basins [11,36].

The most important aquifers in the Mesogeia Basin in Attica, which is part of the Attica–Cyclades zone, are constituted by Triassic–Jurassic limestones, Upper Cretaceous limestones, marly limestones, and travertine limestones (permeable rocks) [34–38]. The main part of the Mesogeia Basin, including the Koropi area (Figure 2), is occupied by Quaternary formations (gravels, sand, and clays) which characterize a low productive phreatic aquifer [35]. The alluvial deposits form a phreatic aquifer displaying limited permeability and poor hydraulic characteristics, due to fine grain compositions; they feed a large number of wells and boreholes, with depths ranging from 10 to 20 m [35–37].

4. Global Distribution of Coastal Groundwater

Climate change, due to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, may affect the saltwater intrusion through changes in precipitation and temperature [40]. Coastal aquifers within the zones of influence are threatened by rising sea levels worldwide (Figure 3).

The phenomenon of seawater intrusion has been recorded in many coastal areas, such as in Texas, Florida, Indonesia, Syria, in South Asia (Bangkok) in Africa (Nigeria, Egypt and Tunisia), China, Australia, and Europe (Cyprus, Turkey, Estonia, Italy, and Greece) [10,12,23,25,31–38]. Global review publications provide an extensive array of field, laboratory, and computer-based techniques for the investigation of the seawater intrusion, its composition, and prediction of freshwater–saltwater interfaces over regional scales [23,41–46].

5. Geochemical Characteristics and Salinization of Coastal Groundwater

A common feature of the groundwater from the Neogene lacustrine formations of the Attica Basin, which has been affected by occasionally enclosed (tectonically) serpentinized peridotites, and the C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva Basins and the Loutraki area (Figure 3b,c) is the effect of the seawater intrusion [11–14,31–38,41], although they have been classified in various water types: the water samples from Attica as a Ca–HCO3 water type [37], while those from C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basins and the Loutraki area are of Mg–HCO3 type, due to the CO2-driven dissolution of dominant minerals, such as serpentine and Mg-carbonates/hydroxides [11,14,31]. In order to better understanding the hydrochemistry of the above aquifers and the driving force of the Cr(VI) stability in contaminated coastal water, representative groundwater samples from the Attica, Assopos–Thiva, and C. Evia Neogene Basins were analyzed in the present study for major and trace elements, including rare earth elements (REEs) and platinum group elements (PGEs) (Table 1), which were combined with the relative literature data.

Major and trace elements (Table 1) are in a good agreement with those in previous studies, often exhibiting Cr(VI) concentrations over the maximum acceptable level for Crtotal in drinking water (50 μg/L), although the water contaminated by industrial activities in the area of Oinofita (or Inofyta), near the Assopos river (Assopos Basin) has shown concentrations higher than 8000 μg/L [19]. Besides the elevated B, Br, Se, Li, As, V, U, S, Na, K, Ca and Mg concentrations, the concentrations for the majority of REEs are lower than the detection limit of the method (<0.01 μg/L), except values of 0.02 μg/L La and 0.01 to 0.02 μg/L Nd measured in the Assopos and C. Evia aquifers, and 0.02 μg/L Gd and 0.02 μg/L Dy measured in the Attica aquifers. The measured range for Sc of lanthanides was 2–3 μg/L in the Attica aquifers and 4–14 μg/L Sc in the C. Evia and Assopos Basins (Table 1). With respect to platinum-group elements, Pd was lower than the detection limit of the method (0.2 μg/L). The Pt was lower than detection limit (0.01 μg/L) in the Attica aquifers, while 0.01 values were measured in the C. Evia and Assopos aquifers. The Ru concentrations ranged from 0.06 to 0.3 μg/L in Attica, and from 0.06 to 0.19 μg/L in the C. Evia and Assopos Basins (Table 1). Additionally, these water samples were analyzed for the elements Au, Ag, Al, Ti, W, Tl, Te, Ta, Sn, In, Hf, Ge, Pb, Cs, Hg, Be, Bi, Cd, Ga and Y, but their concentrations were lower than the detection limit of the method. The measured concentrations for REEs and PGEs in water leachates for altered peridotites were also too low (Table 1). The available data on groundwater from previous studies exhibiting the lowest B and Cr(VI) concentrations have been recorded in the Mavrosouvala wells of karst type (Table 2), which are used for the municipal water supply of Athens city.

Table 2. Average composition of groundwater from the Assopos, Thiva, Attica Basins and C. Evia and seawater. Data from refs [19,32–38,46–49].

 

 

 

 

μg/L

 

 

 

 

 

mg/L

 

 

 

g/L

Location

n

Cr

Cr(VI)

B

Li

As

Se

Ca

Mg

S

Na

K

pH

TDS

δ53Cr

Groundwater

                             

Karst type

                             

Mavrosouvala

3

<1

<1

18

2.5

2.4

<0.5

90.3

17

4

14

0.6

7.4

0.31

 

Attica, Athens

19

9.7

9

43

6.4

3.5

1.9

120

20

15

44

2.5

7.3

0.43

 

Attica, Koropi

31

12

10

130

8

8.4

10

135

55

37

217

8.8

7.4

0.48

 

Assopos basin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avlida

10

70

64

440

16

4

9.3

36

99.8

37

310

11

7.4

1.13

 

Oropos

3

61

57

120

23

3

3

38.5

55.3

15

109

1.6

7.5

0.59

 

Oropos

As.K.W.

900

850

130

32

4.5

8.8

40.2

140

60

408

2.5

7.7

1.42

1.16 ± 0.09

Avlona

2

72

66

36

0.8

2.3

1.6

64

72

6

28

0.8

7.4

0.41

1.01 ± 0.02

C. Evia

7

63

62

70

5.3

0.6

1.2

78

73

20

33.4

1.9

7.4

0.4

1.42 ± 0.37

C.Evia

E7

260

250

40

7.3

0.7

2.2

64

13

44

32

2.4

7.34

0.28

0.98 ± 0.08

Water leachates (altered peridotites)

                     

 

 

C. Evia

R2BA

35

36

124

3.2

1.7

<0.5

26

1.9

<1

3.4

0.7

8.1

 

0.56 ± 0.04

 

R2BB

64

63

98

0.2

<0.5

<0.5

26

6.1

<1

2.8

0.6

8.1

 

0.86 ± 0.06

 

R3

30

29

78

15

0.8

<0.5

25

2.9

<1

2.4

0.6

8.3

 

0.96 ± 0.06

Seawater

                             

Mediterranean

4

0.55

<1

4200

160

84

360

400

1200

1200

6380

485

 

 

1.13 ± 0.09

Assopos Estuary

Ass.c.

0.26

<1

4500

190

88

360

392

1250

1260

6400

500

 

 

0.79 ± 0.14

Pacific Ocean

6

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.72 ± 0.14

Atlantic Ocean

15

0.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.76 ± 0.24

Baltic sea

12

0.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.42 ± 0.20

Antarctica

3

0.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.57 ± 0.03

Geothermal water

                             

Aedipsos, Evia

9

n.d.

 

9500

1400

68

380

1080

310

480

9800

300

6.6

27

 

K. Vourla, C. Greece

5

n.d.

 

3400

380

29

145

540

350

200

45,800

110

6.1

9.0

 

Vendenheim, France

2

2.7

 

37,000

155,000

960

 

3450

62

180

27,400

3700

7.5

96

 

Present analytical data (Table 1) combining those from previous studies (Table 2) indicated that the best pronounced positive trend between B and Cr(VI) was recorded in C. Evia and Attica (Figure 4a). Limited data from the neighboring Mediterranean seawater (Assopos river estuary and Evoic Gulf) were plotted in a separate field characterized by much higher B and lower Cr(VI), comparable to those for geothermal water (Figure 4a). In addition, a good positive correlation between total dissolved solids (TDS) and B concentrations is a common feature of those water types (Figure 4b). A negative trend between the mass ratio Ca/Mg and the Cr(VI) concentrations recorded in groundwater from the studied Neogene Basins was followed by geothermal water (Figure 4c). In addition, a negative trend was clear between total organic carbon and Cr(VI) concentrations, for both lower and higher Cr(VI)concentrations of 50 μg/L in groundwater from the Assopos Basin (Figure 4d).

Figure 4. Plots of the Cr(VI) and total dissolved solids (TDS) versus B concentrations (a,b); Ca/Mg mass ratio and total organic carbon (TOC) versus Cr(VI) concentrations (c,d) for coastal groundwater from Attica, C. Evia), the Assopos–Thiva Basins, sea and geothermal water. Data from Tables 1 and 2 [19,31–38,48,49].

The plots of available stable chromium isotopes [38,46] expressed as δ53Cr values versus B and Cr(VI) concentrations for coastal groundwater from the C. Evia, Assopos Basin and water leachates for peridotites showed a negative trend (Figure 5a). Moreover, plots of δ53Cr values versus Cr(VI) concentrations for seawater from the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and Mediterranean and Baltic seas [43], showed a negative trend as well (Figure 5b).

Figure 5. Plot of the δ53Cr values versus B (a), and Cr(VI) (b) concentrations for coastal groundwater (GW) from the C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva Basins, water leachates for rocks (serpentinized peridotites) and soils, and seawater (Mediterranean Sea, Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and Baltic Sea). Data from refs [38,46,47,50].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/min11020160

This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Academic Video Service